510:. That is, they claim that our accounts are all being used by the same real person as the DeFacto account! If that were true the effect would be that I am actually you, and you are actually me! Clearly that is nonsensical. However, if that claim goes unchallenged, it would probably be a bad thing, leading to a certain barring from Knowledge (XXG). I think that we should try to defend ourselves against that claim (assuming that you are not he either!). I don't know how to do that yet though, so will try to investigate that further. I will let you know what I find. Have you tried digging deeper yourself?
1254:) which I forgot to mention above, tried to find a way to resolve the issues by discussion. I was seriously hampered though by being unable to get Martinvl to engage, but having to find a way to deal with his constant reversions. In the future though (if I still have one!) I will certainly concentrate more on the discussion approach and try to engage outside support, rather than futilely attempt to press any point within the articles themselves.
574:
revenge-seekers showing up who seem to be so blinded by their hatred, that they will see random strangers punished for the actions of others. They will apparently "convict" based on the mere opinions of other bigots - their "friends" in this conflict, rather than on a rational consideration of verifiable evidence. I honestly don't know how to handle or counter that - let us hope that the final judgement is made through a fair, unbiased process.
781:
863:
24:, in combination with the edit summary "→Cultural issues: That information was incorrect, the U.S. officially adopted it already" indicate an intention to remove correct and useful information from the encyclopedia. The US has not adopted SI as it's only, or dominant, system of measurement. Any similar edits in the future are likely to you receiving adverse attention from the Knowledge (XXG) community.
1318:. ANI is generally for a specific incident or at least a series of recent incidents. AN is more amorphous. In your case, you might use AN if you wanted to propose a topic ban as opposed to a block or some other kind of sanction. Bear in mind that anyone who comes to these boards may be subjected to intense scrutiny about their own behavior. They aren't boards for the thin-skinned.
1529:
1409:
1124:) who I had never come across before, and who doesn't seem to appear in the recent history of any of the articles involved, raised the "SPI" against me (and against 3 others of whom I have no prior knowledge either). Martinvl was quick to jump in there to support the action with his unique interpretation of my actions and history.
291:
attempted to engage in discussion on the talk page, and I believe my changes are justified. The last change I made was to add a flag to point out that the reference does not support the challenged claim. If the necessary support for the claim is subsequently provided, then I will happily revert the last change that I made.
1497:"clerk" was so quick to parcel it all away into the archive. Heaven forbid that anyone should check it over, or that the hapless victims would be given a chance to ask any awkward questions! And I see there is no information given here, or anywhere else as far as I can tell, to explain what it all means for the "guilty".
514:
various modifications that he didn't approve of. Interestingly too, he has added a comment on the sock puppet report page. He hadn't created the report though, unless he also uses the NebY account of course, which is a possibility worth pursuing I think. How did he coincidentally come across us both otherwise?
106:
devices. If the shopkeeper resists, the police are called and the shopkeeper is hauled off to jail. That doesn't happen in the US because the US has only partially adopted SI, and the areas where it has been retained as an option are largely the areas concerning everyday life such as sports, clothes, and food.
1288:
Sorry, I'm not going to take the time to read your account and express an opinion on the merits of your points. As for stress, that's of course up to you, but
Knowledge (XXG) can be stressful. Some of it depends on whether you're here to generally improve articles or whether, as apparently is true in
1202:
mechanisms to obtain consensus-driven changes to the articles. If you believe there are editor conduct issues (and I'm not expressing an opinion on that one way or the other), as opposed to content disputes, you can bring those to the appropriate administrative noticeboard. The one thing you can't do
573:
that someone left for me. Read it if you are going to comment, it explains what's expected. I made a "statement" based on its guidance. And it's hotting up there a bit now, there is a trigger-happy crowd gathering. I can't imagine what De Facto, or whoever, did in the past, but there are some serious
1339:
All that said, I'm going to unblock you based on your representations here. A couple of warnings, though. First, just because you've tried a particular dispute resolution mechanism and it hasn't worked doesn't entitle you to battle in an article. Second, if I notice that your conduct doesn't conform
105:
When a country has official adopted the metric system as a mandatory system for all, or nearly all uses, it's easy to tell. If a shopkeeper sells goods with no metric indication of quantity, the local weighs and measures inspectors come in and seize the offending packages, scales, or other measuring
1067:
By the time I came back, about 20 hours later, Martinvl had reacted by reverting most of what I had done to the "Metric system", "List of
British inventions", "International system of units", "Metre" and "History of the metric system" articles - and with minimal explanation. I tried to again reform
983:
In some ways, this is almost a textbook example of a good unblock request. However, your history is troubling. You've been warned of edit-warring before this latest problem, although you've never been blocked before. Your history since first creating an account at
Knowledge (XXG) has been unusually
685:
I never asked for permission to move your comments and I have no intention of moving them, and I don't expect anyone else to jumble them about either. The summary honestly, accurately and succinctly summarized the reason, as I saw it, for my edit. Do you think he was moving it all about to make his
1133:
I hope I don't sound arrogant or to be whining or bitter, but, to be frank, I can't quite comprehend how I have got into so much apparent trouble, after doing what I honestly thought was the right thing for
Knowledge (XXG) in those few articles. I had tried to engage Martinvl in discussion, but he
1014:
Thanks for the compliment - yes, I am trying to work within the spirit of the guidance and the rules, and realise now that constant do/undo cycles are non-productive. I do seem to have been unfortunate though, in that I struck a raw nerve with that one editor you mentioned, in amongst the SI units
943:
I realise now that I should have tried harder to reach agreement with the other editor through discussion rather than by continually re-editing the article. I have, in the meantime, began to find my way around the talk pages and various noticeboards (fringe theories and no original research). I do
153:
Hi
MeasureIT Your comments about the UK being totally metric are just incorrect. The USMA source was somebody's PhD thesis which dealt with metrication in the US and Mexico. I doubt that the original editor researched every single line of the appendix fully - if he did he was wrong to state that
1083:
Perhaps at that point I should have abandoned hope and left it at that, but I wasn't happy to leave the articles with such flaws and in such a misleading condition, so I chose to try to correct some of the articles again. The reaction this time, after I had made just the 2 attempts to change the
513:
I haven't crossed the path of NebY before, so I don't know where whoever it is came from, or what their motivation is. I am very interested to see that
Martinvl appears on your talkpage too though, and seems to have reacted against you, as he did against me, in my case, in retaliation for making
109:
Another way to tell is if the government never allows or requires persons to deal with the government in non-SI units. Good luck finding a booklet of fishing rules that tells how long your fish must be in SI units; all the ones I've seen use inches. And just try getting a driver's license if you
1496:
My gut feel was right then. Now I wasn't expecting a hearing that would be cited in years to come as a shining example of how to conduct such affairs. But wow - I wasn't expecting that! And so shamelessly one-sided! And just before I got the chance to post my evidence, funny that. No wonder the
290:
I have already tried twice to "engage in discusssion" there, but there were no takers, and certainly no attempt to justify the claim that I am challenging. I note too that in the last 24 hours you have equalled my number of reversions there - we are currently at 2 apiece. I have explained mine,
1143:
I also took the precaution of raising discussions on the fringe and OR noticeboards to double-check that I wasn't misleading myself, and on those boards my thoughts were supported, which gave me the confidence and motivation to continue (to no avail though) to attempt to fix things. One editor
339:
I guess you are asking me to do it because you have run out of reverts yourself. I have already started a discussion on the talk page there, if you want to participate fine - but if you don't, then you can hardly complain if your view isn't taken into account there.
735:
Then why did you bury the statement I made under that derogatory heading? Aren't I entitled to put my case with the same weight and visibility as the one making the allegation, and without such a blight being put on it? And what do you mean by "I am a checkuser"?
1233:
read my account in detail, and gave me your honest thoughts about it, and whether you think I have a point, or am being paranoid. This SPI thing has hit my confidence badly, and leaves me wondering whether it is worth the stress to continue here in
Knowledge
989:
670:. Moving comments is generally frowned upon and Martinvl should not really have moved those comments, but to accuse someone of doing it for nefarious reasons is not on. Incidentally, I do not give permission for you (or anyone else) to move my comments.
550:
It looks like you have made good progress in understanding what's going on. I see you subsequently got through to DeFacto's talk page too. I'll try and put together a "defence" of myself later, but I'm so busy with other commitments at the moment.
1024:
When I came back to
Knowledge (XXG) at the end of December, after a period away on duty, I came across what I though was a major inconsistency in the verifiability of certain claims, in a series of articles, being made about the role of
376:? There is a great big notice in red on that noticeboard requiring you to do so - refering to me as "another editor" rather than by name is not an excuse. For the record, I have added a note about this action on the 3RR noticeboard.
127:
It didn't say "as a mandatory system for all", just that were officially metric. If you have sources offering an alternate opinion add them too, but USMA are a US association concerned with metrication, so their opininion is important.
65:, which says the United States is non-metric but the government adopted the metric system as an option in 1866. And that is from the USMA, a metric advocacy group which should not be relied upon for a neutral point of view.
1029:
in the history of the present day metric system. I tried to change the wording in the articles to reflect what I saw in the sources. After I had unravelled all the relevant links to John
Wilkins, I edited these articles:
88:
page. USMA is the US Metric
Association so why would they falsely claim "For example, officially, the U.S. has been metric since 1866, 1893, 1975, or 1988, depending on which official declaration you prefer to cite"?
166:
and back. The road signs were in miles. I will agree that the wine we had with our evening meal came from a 750 ml bottle and that the coffee came from a 200 g jar. The plain truth is that matrication in the UK
79:
In that page I removed content saying the U.S. had not officially adopted the metric system which had no reference for it. You don't need a reference to support the lack of a false claim but it does conflict with
1169:
I feel obliged to follow my gut feel on this, and I suspect that the John Wilkins content isn't the only faulty content that has been added to Knowledge (XXG) articles by this particular editor.
1096:. Perhaps because I didn't defer to him, he then made a false report about me to the edit warring noticeboard (1 of his 4 diffs was of an edit of his own and another was of me adding a flag):
992:). For those reasons, even assuming good faith, please explain more specifically what you will do differently to avoid future disruptive editing. Perhaps, for example, you could edit articles
186:
Hi Martinvl. Is this another warning or did you miss a heading? I'm not going to revert what I put as it has a reference. Are you goiung to revert the unreferenced stuff you replaced it with?
1194:
Thanks for the history. A bit long, so I only skimmed. But you didn't really address my question. If I unblock you (and at this rate your block may expire first), or even if I don't, what do
700:
I have no opinion on why he was moving the comments, but why assume he had an ulterior motive? Failing to assume good faith will get you blocked as sure as edit-warring has got you blocked.
361:
622:
It's quietened down a bit now! They don't seem keen to support the claims with any evidence. I don't understand how that culture of throwing wild accusations about is tolerated.
944:
completely understand what I was blocked for and, when allowed, will concentrate on making productive contributions and will not again engage in these pointless edit battles.
1111:
So I hope you'd agree that, although it looks bad at first glance to see two 3rr warnings and an edit war action against me, in reality they do not represent the whole truth.
649:
570:
47:
information. The USMA reference contradicts your opinion. I think the Knowledge (XXG) community should prefer the correct information more than the incorrect information.
1251:
To your question; I fully appreciate that squabbling in the article is wrong, and have, through the noticeboards mentioned, and via the "third opinion" service (
1198:
intend to do at Knowledge (XXG) to avoid more problems? If you want to continue to focus on the same articles, then you'd have to stay on the talk pages and use
1148:) who had clearly spotted my actions has now made some quite significant changes and discussion contributions to three of the articles that I had flagged (
1271:
You suggest "appropriate administrative noticeboard", can you be more specific please, or point me to a link with more details about this side of things.
242:
puts it: " Red flags that should prompt extra caution include:... surprising or apparently important claims not covered by multiple mainstream sources".
1478:
1068:
some of those articles, with more explicit edit summaries and with more talk page comments, but again he reacted unfavorably. To boot, he added this
373:
984:
troubling. Putting aside the pending sock report, you seem to have ongoing disputes and an excessive amount of non-collaborative interaction with
462:
I understand it all. Why were you interested in discussing it there when you hadn't shown any interest in it in the other places I mentioned and
898:
233:, or even that his work is credited as being in any way relevant to the history of the metric system, by any notable and mainstream historians.
1543:
1456:
825:
210:
removing all references to him is unneccessary. If you feel strongly about the inclusion of his work, use a "citation needed" template (see
238:
Please explain your interest and reason for promoting Wilkins in such a way, despite the total absence of suitably accredited sources. As
1471:
831:
666:
before jumping to ridiculous conclusions like that. Furthermore, you are not permitted to move other people's comments around, per
722:
I am a checkuser. As such, I retain ultimate discretion over the form of the SPI process. I advise you do not revert me again. --
893:
839:
1535:
1444:
809:
1031:
1149:
1047:
801:
321:
1417:
843:
788:
211:
1157:
272:
207:
870:
171:
in 1965 and is not yet complete. Now please revert all the changes that you made, otherwise an edit war will erupt.
1436:
1428:
1424:
805:
797:
365:
1517:
912:
705:
675:
214:}}, but do not delete the text as you are removing the opportunity of somebody else to provide a citation.
1466:
1374:
Thanks a million Bbb23! I'll try my utmost not to disappoint you, and thanks for the other pointers too.
835:
751:
1074:
with a more comprehensive explanation of my reasons. I got no reply and no further talk page discussion.
667:
360:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
1534:
You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still
239:
627:
579:
540:
522:
1512:
It means what it meant last time – you'll just set up again with another name, and we'll spot it.
507:
1513:
1039:
701:
671:
441:
431:"If you mention specific editors, please notify them. You may use {{subst:FTN-notice}} to do so."
381:
329:
280:
219:
176:
1460:
755:
723:
532:
1539:
503:
495:
Many thanks for the information you left for me. No I wasn't made aware of that development.
1450:
815:
118:
70:
29:
1311:
663:
535:
too, but it is locked, and the form to request an edit to it is locked too, so I couldn't.
313:
264:
62:
1551:
1345:
1208:
1001:
971:
851:
395:
1315:
1199:
544:
526:
571:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims
399:
81:
1498:
1375:
1275:
1181:
1102:. That report did not receive any attention, and has since disappeared from that board.
945:
876:
737:
687:
623:
597:
575:
552:
536:
518:
467:
407:
341:
292:
243:
187:
129:
90:
48:
1340:
to your promises here, you risk being blocked without any further warning or notice.--
1443:. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
1153:
1145:
1035:
985:
437:
377:
325:
276:
230:
215:
172:
1427:
that was created to violate Knowledge (XXG) policy. Note that multiple accounts are
43:
according to the USMA reference I added. The information I replaced it with was the
1026:
758:
726:
1120:
It was after that that events took a bizarre change of course, some other editor (
394:
Why were you interested in discussing it there when you hadn't shown any interest
110:
insist on giving your height and weight in centimeters and kilograms respectively.
163:
114:
85:
66:
25:
1547:
1341:
1204:
997:
967:
847:
1134:
rarely responded, but nevertheless blanket reverted much of what I'd changed.
1121:
1084:
articles, both of which he had reverted, was that he issued these warnings:
499:
154:
the UK was toally metric. The UK is not totally metric - today I drove from
1528:
808:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
229:
I have yet to see any evidence that he is credited as having invented the
206:
You seem to have a bee in your bonnet about John Wilkins. In the case of
1055:
750:
There are no entitlements on Knowledge (XXG). Regarding checkusers, read
159:
652:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
1555:
1521:
1506:
1483:
1408:
1383:
1349:
1283:
1212:
1189:
1051:
1005:
975:
953:
855:
761:
745:
729:
709:
695:
679:
631:
605:
583:
560:
475:
445:
415:
385:
349:
333:
300:
284:
251:
223:
195:
180:
137:
122:
98:
74:
56:
33:
1310:
The two most likely noticeboards to complain about editor conduct are
596:
Ah, thanks. That could be helpful. There's a lot going on there now.
320:
Would you please revert the last change that you made in the article
271:
Would you please revert the last change that you made in the article
113:
A flat statement that the US has adopted the metric system is false.
372:
Why did you not let me know that you were discussing this matter at
1043:
428:
The Fringe Theory noticeboard has the following statement in red:
155:
39:
Please read the edit summary again. The information I removed was
1178:
Please advise what course of action you think I should take now.
466:
did you add it to your false accusation on the 3RR noticeboard?
406:
did you add it to your false accusation on the 3RR noticeboard?
1403:
364:
regarding a possible violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on
1527:
861:
779:
966:
Per request, discussion below, and my explicit conditions.
838:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
498:
My reading of that is that the user of an account called
362:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
1252:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1072:
1069:
926:
922:
916:
907:
903:
889:
885:
881:
660:
21:
842:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
650:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
869:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
436:
Which part of that statement do you not understand?
84:from USMA which I had added for the content on the
804:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
1071:rather brusque comment to my talk page. I replied
324:. We cannot discuss if you keep on reverting.
754:. Sorry, I have no time for these questions. --
356:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
8:
61:You appear to be referring to a citation to
662:is unacceptable. Familiarise yourself with
374:Knowledge (XXG):Fringe theories/Noticeboard
830:During a dispute, you should first try to
648:Hello. There is currently a discussion at
307:3RR Warning (History of the metric system)
258:3RR Warning (Lists of British inventions)
569:I should have mentioned the guidance at
1289:your case, you have a particular focus.
812:by adding below this notice the text
7:
1274:And thanks for your attention here.
14:
506:of the user of an account called
1407:
1058:". Then I stopped and went away.
1455:below, but you should read the
996:measurement-related articles?--
487:
212:Knowledge (XXG):Citation needed
686:contributions less prominent?
1:
1540:unblock ticket request system
1032:International System of Units
832:discuss controversial changes
792:from editing for a period of
350:15:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
334:14:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
301:15:44, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
285:14:24, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
252:22:46, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
224:21:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
1203:is battle in the articles.--
1150:History of the metric system
1048:History of the metric system
802:History of the metric system
502:has claimed that we all are
322:History of the metric system
162:(where I am on vacation) to
1556:22:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
1522:18:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
1507:18:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
1484:19:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
1384:21:55, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
1350:21:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
1284:21:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
1213:20:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
1190:20:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
1158:Lists of British inventions
1006:16:47, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
976:21:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
954:09:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
873:, who accepted the request.
856:00:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
762:21:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
746:20:19, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
730:20:15, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
710:01:36, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
696:19:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
680:12:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
632:18:38, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
606:17:40, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
584:11:41, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
561:07:39, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
545:12:00, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
527:11:53, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
476:21:35, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
446:21:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
416:20:03, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
386:09:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
275:and engage in discusssion.
273:Lists of British inventions
208:Lists of British inventions
196:17:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
181:22:12, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
138:06:35, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
123:22:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
99:21:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
75:23:21, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
57:17:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
34:21:46, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
1571:
1542:, but you should read our
824:, but you should read the
1544:guide to appealing blocks
1536:contest any current block
1492:The end of the beginning?
1457:guide to appealing blocks
1229:I'd appreciate it if you
826:guide to appealing blocks
806:make useful contributions
531:I tried to add a note to
1502:
1453:|Your reason here ~~~~}}
1379:
1279:
1185:
949:
741:
691:
601:
556:
488:I didn't know about that
471:
411:
345:
296:
247:
191:
133:
94:
52:
1532:
1416:This account has been
866:
784:
1531:
1090:. To which I replied
913:change block settings
865:
820:Your reason here ~~~~
783:
1099:. I responded thus:
770:Awards, blocks, etc.
1447:by adding the text
1533:
1200:dispute resolution
1040:Talk:Metric system
867:
840:dispute resolution
785:
1489:
1488:
1482:
1474:
1469:
1445:appeal this block
810:appeal this block
656:This edit summary
533:User talk:DeFacto
492:Hello MeasureIT,
1562:
1476:
1472:
1467:
1454:
1411:
1404:
1400:January 2013 (2)
1015:articles though.
932:
930:
919:
901:
899:deleted contribs
864:
823:
800:, as you did at
782:
644:ANI Notification
368:. Thank you.
312:This is a formal
263:This is a formal
1570:
1569:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1494:
1448:
1435:using them for
1402:
980:
979:
957:
920:
910:
896:
879:
862:
859:
844:page protection
813:
780:
777:
772:
720:
658:
646:
490:
358:
309:
260:
204:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1568:
1566:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1493:
1490:
1487:
1486:
1412:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1272:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1179:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1009:
1008:
964:
941:
937:Request reason
934:
860:
786:You have been
778:
776:
773:
771:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
719:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
657:
654:
645:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
589:
588:
587:
586:
564:
563:
489:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
434:
433:
432:
421:
420:
419:
418:
389:
388:
357:
354:
353:
352:
308:
305:
304:
303:
259:
256:
255:
254:
235:
234:
203:
200:
199:
198:
151:
150:
149:
148:
147:
146:
145:
144:
143:
142:
141:
140:
111:
107:
82:this reference
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1567:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1538:by using the
1537:
1530:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1514:Bretonbanquet
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1491:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1475:
1470:
1464:
1463:
1458:
1452:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1421:
1419:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1405:
1399:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1232:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1180:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1159:
1155:
1154:Metric system
1151:
1147:
1146:User:Ergative
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1101:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1073:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1036:Metric system
1033:
1028:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
987:
986:User:Martinvl
982:
981:
978:
977:
973:
969:
963:
961:
960:Accept reason
956:
955:
951:
947:
940:
938:
933:
928:
924:
918:
914:
909:
905:
900:
895:
891:
890:global blocks
887:
886:active blocks
883:
878:
874:
872:
871:administrator
858:
857:
853:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
827:
821:
817:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
790:
774:
769:
763:
760:
757:
753:
749:
748:
747:
743:
739:
734:
733:
732:
731:
728:
725:
717:
711:
707:
703:
702:Bretonbanquet
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
684:
683:
682:
681:
677:
673:
672:Bretonbanquet
669:
665:
661:
655:
653:
651:
643:
633:
629:
625:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
607:
603:
599:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
585:
581:
577:
572:
568:
567:
566:
565:
562:
558:
554:
549:
548:
547:
546:
542:
538:
534:
529:
528:
524:
520:
515:
511:
509:
505:
501:
496:
493:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
447:
443:
439:
435:
430:
429:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
390:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
370:
369:
367:
363:
355:
351:
347:
343:
338:
337:
336:
335:
331:
327:
323:
318:
317:
315:
306:
302:
298:
294:
289:
288:
287:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
268:
266:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
236:
232:
231:metric system
228:
227:
226:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
184:
183:
182:
178:
174:
170:
165:
161:
157:
139:
135:
131:
126:
125:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
103:
102:
101:
100:
96:
92:
87:
83:
78:
77:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
59:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
38:
37:
36:
35:
31:
27:
23:
16:
1495:
1477:
1462:Dennis Brown
1461:
1440:
1437:illegitimate
1432:
1420:indefinitely
1415:
1414:
1230:
1195:
1027:John Wilkins
993:
965:
959:
958:
942:
936:
935:
908:creation log
875:
868:
829:
819:
798:edit warring
793:
787:
775:January 2013
752:WP:CHECKUSER
721:
659:
647:
530:
516:
512:
504:sock puppets
497:
494:
491:
463:
403:
366:edit warring
359:
319:
311:
310:
270:
262:
261:
205:
202:John WIlkins
168:
152:
44:
40:
20:
1425:sock puppet
990:this report
668:WP:REFACTOR
164:Dyrham Park
86:Metrication
994:other than
904:filter log
240:WP:REDFLAG
1499:MeasureIT
1376:MeasureIT
1276:MeasureIT
1182:MeasureIT
1122:User:NebY
946:MeasureIT
923:checkuser
882:block log
877:MeasureIT
836:consensus
834:and seek
738:MeasureIT
688:MeasureIT
624:Curatrice
598:MeasureIT
576:Curatrice
553:MeasureIT
537:Curatrice
519:Curatrice
468:MeasureIT
408:MeasureIT
342:MeasureIT
293:MeasureIT
244:MeasureIT
188:MeasureIT
130:MeasureIT
91:MeasureIT
63:this site
49:MeasureIT
41:incorrect
22:This edit
1479:Join WER
1439:reasons
1056:Kilogram
894:contribs
818:|reason=
794:24 hours
438:Martinvl
378:Martinvl
326:Martinvl
316:warning.
277:Martinvl
267:warning.
216:Martinvl
173:Martinvl
160:Somerset
1546:first.
1459:first.
1451:unblock
1429:allowed
1418:blocked
1054:" and "
1052:England
1038:" and "
917:unblock
816:unblock
789:blocked
759:ɐuɐʞsǝp
727:ɐuɐʞsǝp
718:Warning
508:DeFacto
169:started
45:correct
17:Warning
1441:is not
1312:WP:ANI
1234:(XXG).
828:first.
756:(ʞɿɐʇ)
724:(ʞɿɐʇ)
664:WP:AGF
517:Ciao,
402:? And
314:WP:3RR
265:WP:3RR
115:Jc3s5h
67:Jc3s5h
26:Jc3s5h
1548:Bbb23
1423:as a
1342:Bbb23
1316:WP:AN
1231:could
1205:Bbb23
1044:Metre
998:Bbb23
988:(see
968:Bbb23
848:Bbb23
156:Frome
1552:talk
1518:talk
1503:talk
1380:talk
1346:talk
1314:and
1280:talk
1209:talk
1186:talk
1156:and
1093:and
1050:", "
1046:", "
1042:", "
1034:", "
1002:talk
972:talk
950:talk
852:talk
796:for
742:talk
706:talk
692:talk
676:talk
628:talk
602:talk
580:talk
557:talk
541:talk
523:talk
500:NebY
472:talk
442:talk
412:talk
400:here
396:here
382:talk
346:talk
330:talk
297:talk
281:talk
248:talk
220:talk
192:talk
177:talk
134:talk
119:talk
95:talk
71:talk
53:talk
30:talk
1433:but
1196:you
927:log
846:.
464:why
404:why
398:or
158:in
1554:)
1520:)
1505:)
1468:2¢
1465:-
1449:{{
1431:,
1382:)
1348:)
1282:)
1211:)
1188:)
1160:).
1152:,
1087:,
1004:)
974:)
962::
952:)
939::
921:•
915:•
911:•
906:•
902:•
897:•
892:•
888:•
884:•
854:)
822:}}
814:{{
744:)
708:)
694:)
678:)
630:)
604:)
582:)
559:)
543:)
525:)
474:)
444:)
414:)
384:)
348:)
332:)
299:)
283:)
250:)
222:)
194:)
179:)
136:)
121:)
97:)
73:)
55:)
32:)
1550:(
1516:(
1501:(
1473:©
1378:(
1344:(
1278:(
1207:(
1184:(
1144:(
1030:"
1000:(
970:(
948:(
931:)
929:)
925:(
880:(
850:(
740:(
704:(
690:(
674:(
626:(
600:(
578:(
555:(
539:(
521:(
470:(
440:(
410:(
380:(
344:(
328:(
295:(
279:(
246:(
218:(
190:(
175:(
132:(
117:(
93:(
69:(
51:(
28:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.