773:'Augustus', a cognomen that was used after the First Settlement in 27 BC. But the article, while well written, is confusing because most of the info in the article that comes after this section in the article where I made the change is "prior" to 27 BC, and even the actual name change in the article is below this section in the article where I made the name change to 'Octavian'. What I am saying is that the article is not written completely chronologically, and that confused me.
814:"On the morrow of the clash, the settlers, broken by the loss of family and friends and by the sight of the mutilated bodies, hastened to collect their belongings and depart. Cuthbert Grant, once more a clerk rather than a war captain, took an inventory of the goods left behind, signed the lists of thousands of items for hours on end, and, then, after two days of these last details, he watched the colonists sail northward, leaving his metis once more in command of the forks."
26:
2428:
139:." Given that, do you still think it's information that should be relegated to a bullet at the bottom of the article? What if the note in the lede clarified it was specific to the musical? In any event, it's much better now than before. This edit started as a discussion with some colleagues who had forgotten the number and looked at the Knowledge page and were surprised it did not help them.
395:. The reason I reinstated the remark of FelisRead that you deleted was that I felt that it should be present and visible during the dispute resolution process. It is a good reflection of the difficulty that I and all other editors have had attempting to deal with him. By deleting his comment, you have inadvertently done him a favour that he does not deserve. --
1462:
430:
I think it would have been easier for the volunteer to have made a more accurate assessment if FelisRead's comments had been left in place. I fear that FelisRead may be encouraged by the volunteer's comment to continue his aggressive and uncivil (he would claim humorous) attitude. I would encourage you to continue monitoring this page. --
1677:
2068:, rather than just using what is in effect a disambiguation link? Considering how much larger the Allied side of the infobox is, it isn't as if it makes it any more bloated or overly long. Can you please explain to me what the major issues are, which individual edits were in "violation" and how to work around them? Thank you.
689:
the geographic region. The
Belgians officially refer to their portion of Flanders as "the Flemish Region" and the French divide their portion into two areas called "French Westhoek" and "Lilloise Flanders". These are terms atha are currently in use in addition to being historically relevant. So my edit was correct. Cheers!
661:, but was never part of the current region of Flanders (the latter name has been generalized to suit the whole northernmost part of Belgium, and not just the historical region of the County of Flanders). In WWI, there was fighting across this border between France and Belgium, of course, but to say that
2083:
Your POV is that "it is your own opinion" that they should be included there. That list as it stands has been developed as an ongoing process by the consensus of multiple editors, who have has multiple discussions about it over several years. IF you want to reopen this discussion on the the talk page
2039:
between the months of July and
November 1917, so I don't understand why documenting those facts in notes, citing Nicholas II's abdication date as the end of his involvement in the war and removing the execution link, and specifying Kerensky's time in office, is in violation of anything. Likewise, the
1754:
Yes, I reverted some edits. They were of a dubious nature and had no sourcing or explanation, so their reversion was perfectly justifiable. If you want the cooperation with other editors you need to communicate what you are doing. Also, if you want to be taken seriously as a WP editor you may want to
1531:
Being an admin, I'm pretty up on policy and you are as wrong as it comes. You reverted back material that has bad sources and is original research. I REMOVED material for the most part. You need to self revert. If you have a question about any extra part I added, remove that part only and use the
1497:
I reverted you on cat. My changes were based on a request, a request I agreed with and made, and the discussion is on the talk page. The sources and claims were weak, not reliable and original research. It is a bit rude to just revert without giving an explanation or without checking the talk page
1133:
Nonsense. Frequently I come across information that would be of interest to people in the area. A list page can be a place to park it, especially when there is not enough info to warrant all but a stubby article that would be no longer than the material you destroyed. Your actions privilege form over
1062:
opinion into various articles, and, from my own personal experience with it over the years, is physically incapable of discussing or interacting with other editors beyond whining that "Pete is a wolf" and edit-warring to protect its original research nonsense. I just want to let you know to save you
429:
The dispute resolution is over - and we received some good guidance. However one of the comments made by the volunteer mediator was "All participants have behaved well under the pressure of long debate and have remained, commendably civil." I think that is true of all other editors but not FelisRead.
2267:
First of all, i would like to apologize, I thought you were the same person who added Robert
Nivelle (without consensus and going against the "highest leaders only") when you reverted and asked me to find consensus! Secondly, I did now add a talk section for the inclusion of Hussein bin Ali (King of
1566:
You claim to be up on policy but you give no reason to say how I am wrong which makes me question your authority on this or any other matter. I don't need to involve myself in the discussion, because it is irrelevant. No source = Reversion, regardless of what is happening on the talk page. There was
608:
It's really interesting - I always took it as read that it was 'Son' and was surprised to find so many references to 'sun' - both online and printed. All I would suggest is looking at the (apparent!) original text linked to from this page:- "Wikisource has original text related to this article: The
688:
Sorry but you are wrong. Flanders is a geographically defined region, not a political entity with borders. The French people to this day still use the term "Flanders" in reference to that part of the region in their own territory. Belgian
Flanders and French Flanders combine to form the totality of
169:
I would argue that because it is such a significant part of the character in the musical, then IF indeed the article is about both the musical and the book, it deserves to be in the lede. If the article were different (e.g. it had a different hatnote), I'd feel othewise. It sounds like you disagree
154:
As I stated, the number only appears twice in the book, both time in offhand reference and has no real significance to the storyline. Likewise it is either not mentioned or only casually referenced in any of the movies based on the book, except for the musical. It is only in the musical that it has
772:
I changed the named to 'Octavian' because, as you see, under the section in the article where I made the change, the name 'Octavian' is still used. However, if the section where I made the change states and depicts occurrences that happened in 20 BC, you are correct because by 20 BC he was already
2210:
Semantic nonsense. You presume to know what was in the minds of the
Vinland settlers based on non-existent evidence. We can only surmise the purpose of the site based on the archaeological data. The fact that they build permanent structures indicted that they intended to live there on a long term
1374:
So what do you know about MacBeth ? what do you mean comments not constructive ? you have obviously no local knowledge on the subject. here MacBeth is still considered a great
Scottish king tared by Shakespeare pandering to King James and the majority you, still thinking he murdered Duncan its
130:
Thanks for your edit; I'm definitely not knowledgeable about the book. When I added the 24601 note to the lede, I considered that it was likely the book didn't place the same emphasis on the number, but decided it was OK (either way) because of the hatnote, "This article is about the character in
2338:
It sounds like we both agree the article should note that this is a quote from Exodus, so I'm going to restore my edits (which will also restore the citation I'd filled in), with a minor edit for clarity and a better edit summary. Please check to make sure the resulting copy is accurate to your
1738:
even though an inspection would have shown that this was not part of the content of previous or reverted content. You actually reverted only the formatting which I had clearly spelled out in my edit summary but which you failed to appreciate. Please be so good as to reinstate my edit, which had
920:
Correction. I added easily verifiable sourced material that is valid according to the established parameters of the article. You have disputed it on the grounds of notability which you have the right to do. I have fulfilled the requirements of WP:Policy. The onus is therefore on you to prove you
1114:
The purpose of a list page is only to provide links to related articles. If you have a subpject that you think deserves further coverage then you need to create an article for it. No one is blocking you from adding an article with all relevant informations; however, list pages are not for that
2378:
was the supreme court for the
Dominions until each carved out a sovereign common law by abolishing appeals - in Australia that was 1975, in New Zealand as late as 2004 etc. Accordingly, I feel strongly it should be "largely", not fully. It was a step on the journey - it wasn't the destination.
1401:
I have no opinion on the content of your edits. They were reverted because they were not properly sourced. According to
Knowledge policy all edits must be supported with source references. Edits without sources can and will be removed. Use the article's Talk Page if you want to discuss content
390:
Mediatech492, normally I would welcome your intervention. However, if you look at the talk page, you will see that the person previously just known anonymously as the IP editor, and now FelisRead has been a disruptive and aggressive editor since his arrival on the page over a month ago. He has
100:
Thanks but I meant the section, Sulla's legacy section only has one reference - the rest can be removed, no? Will you back me up to delete the whole section except the sentence that is referenced? Otherwise, we are simply choosing which un-referenced sections we like? I think about 50% of the
2364:
Hi there. Appreciate you've undone my change of "fully" to "largely". Respectfully, I have stetted this back to my change. My reasoning is that it's not accurate to describe the statute as creating a series of "fully sovereign nations in their own right". For instance, the issues of
Imperial
990:
Please do not pass by and revert an edit by an established user without explanation. You are held to the same standards as everyone else. All that aside, I am doubtful that that plane could be anything other than a Boeing 747. The most "dubious" part about it is the
Japanese Airlines part.
410:
I cannot agree with your premise Camerojo. By restoring a maliciious edit you do him more of a favour than you claim he gains by removal. Resoultion does not require malicious edits to remain in place, they can be recovered for review without having to leave them as a disruptive element.
2022:
that apparently violated a neutral point of view? I don't seem to see why you have such a problem including them in the infobox when, quote: "Hindenburg was also appointed as Supreme War Commander of the armies of the Central Powers, with nominal control of six million men". {cite
493:
While Claudius sat to witness the games of the circus, some of the young nobility acted on horseback the battle of Troy. Among them was Britannicus, the emperor's son, and Lucius Domitius, who became soon afterwards by adoption heir to the empire with the surname of
1098:
Why did you revert my edits to the page? These are vessels that will never have an article. I cannot understand why you would patrol wikipedia looking for opportunities to throw away information in a quest for neatness. Please undo your destructive editing.
564:
Hi, I'm fairly new to this so don't even know if this is where I'm meant to be talking to you but here goes anyway! I edited 'sun of York' to 'son of York' because I think that's what Shakespeare wrote. What's your evidence to the contrary please? Regards
510:
of whom we have this tradition... This family had the honour of seven consulships, one triumph, and two censorships and being admitted into the patrician order, they continued the use of the same cognomen, with no other praenomina than those of Cneius and
316:
As per the talk page is for constructive discussion of the article, not as a platform for commedy. If you wish to use irony to reinforce a point then that is acceptable. As it was your comment was not constructive (and neither was it particularly funny).
2294:
Hi, I changed the The Rolling Stones article to flesh out a citation to a Benford essay, and to note that Heinlein didn't come up with the phrase "stranger in a strange land" on his own, since it is a quote from the Bible. I added a link to Exodus 2:22.
2195:"Birgitta Wallace from Parks Canada has persuasively argued that the site was a transit station and ship repair site at the entrance to the region of Vinland, the southern and western reaches of the Gulf of St. Lawrence." That's the current consensus.
901:. Your persistent re-insertion of the material, especially when a discussion has been initiated at the article's Talk page, is neither good faith nor in keeping with what is generally considered best practice. I might also recommend that you review
2511:" There is no such thing as a historical source that is not biased ..." - you know deep down that is rubbish. As a professional historian, I can point out many, many books that are written "by committee" to ensure both accuracy and remove biases.
1606:
DO what you think you must, I do know the policies quite well and I have done nothing wrong. Consensus is irrelevant when there are no sources. Your threats are starting to amount to harassment and if it continues any further will be reported.
1053:
If you see any user or IP that starts complaining about "Pete is a wolf" or "Why is Pete a cat? He's a wolf" don't engage it, and, instead revert literally all of the editor's/IP's recent edits, and, if it is a user, get that account blocked
1567:
an obvious discrepancy and so I reverted it. It is not my responsibility to prove anything. it is the responsibility of the original editor to show the information they provide is right; otherwise they (and you) are wrong. Enough said.
672:
is plainly wrong. That is why I tried to rewrite the sentence to explain myself better; apparently I didn't succeed. Could you please explain what you think should be done? Because now the sentence is still just wrong. Sincerely,
1011:
My main issue is that you did not leave an edit summary. Perhaps I am jumping to conclusions too easily, but you can often expect to be reverted if you just revert long-established users' good faith edits with no reason given.
1498:
for a related discussion, then explaining there. At the very least, have the courtesy to use a summary that explains why you are reverting someone with what is obviously a good faith edit based on talk page discussions.
1906:
Strictly speaking there is no source given for his other nickname in the infobox but you seem happy with that: H & the Atropos since you ask :-) Now I am going to have to read the books again to find the other one…
2331:, where I added the reference to Exodus 2:22, I included the edit comment 'Hazel was quoting "stranger in a strange land" from a somewhat earlier work'". I was trying for humorous understatement there (the Bible being a
2138:
649:. The thing is, your revert doesn't match your edit summary; since you say (rightly) that French Flanders was (!) an historical region of Flanders, but it isn't anymore nowadays (and neither was it in WWI). The article
1516:
Regardless of what you think of the old material, the material you added had no supporting sources at all. Therefore it was not an improvement, reversion in that case is mandatory and no explanation is required.
2298:
Your revert to my edits undid both the expanded citation and the reference to Exodus, and your edit comment noted that the reason for the revert was "Heinlein did not originate the phrase, it is a bible quote".
1327:
is incorrect, which is what I noted above as pedantic but meaningful points of fact; the original text is in a different language than you quoted and capitalision does not apply in the context of the original.
2471:
939:
I think you'll find that in most cases regarding disputed content, the onus is in fact on the person who wishes the material to be included to satisfy the concerns regarding whether it should be included
2369:
caused problems in certain jurisdictions - e.g. in the Dominion of Canada the Statute of Westminster was not sufficient to avoid a desire in Ottawa to advance things further - it is for this reason that
2402:
There is a big difference between between sovereignty and independence. If I had more time I might indulge in a semantic discussion, but as such I request you familiarize yourself with the distinction.
2455:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2023:
book|last1=Beach|first1=Jim|title=Haig's intelligence. GHQ and the German Army, 1916–1918|date=2013|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|page=212}} I'd also like to point out that
742:(which we don't use, as it's called "Vlaamse Gemeenschap" or "Flemish Community") you talk about, is purely a political entity (which you say correctly), and doesn't define the geography, although
230:
I have offered no POV. I am neutral. I have stated that the previous version should stay until a new consensus is reached. You're disruptive, but that's OK. It will work itself out in the end.
1437:
Article on Pete and official Disney sources say the character of Pete is a cat. The bear in the Alice shorts may have a similarity to Pete but that does not mean they are the same character.
1423:
364:
I accept your admonition. It was certainly less than constructive. I can't say it won't happen again, but I can say your removal was in good faith. Thank you for defusing the situation.
60:
I notice you removed my small sentence on his cultural barbarism as unsourced. You appear to have left the rest of the section however which is also unsourced. May I ask why? Thanks.
2441:
541:
I reverted the edit because it was unsourced. Include verifiable sourcing with the edit and it can stand. An unsourced edit is always inherently suspect and subject to deletion per
2525:
Efforts to minimize bias often introduce additional bias. I've served on enough committee to know too that they can be as bad as, if not worse than individuals for courting bias.
1589:. Revert again, and I drag you back to AN3. I'm tired of explaining to someone who won't listen or actually read the policy. Your interpretation is not consensus at Knowledge.
2563:
The edit you are advocating is literally complete nonsense, therefore must be considered test/vandalism edit and treated accordingly. Reverted without the need for discussion.
711:, which is more correct. It doesn't matter if the French call it this or that, the statement that "Flanders is a region of Europe that overlies parts of Belgium and France" is
506:
Two celebrated families, the Calvini and Aenobarbi, sprung from the race of the Domitii. The Aenobarbi derive both their extraction and their cognomen from one Lucius Domitius,
2243:
The original was based on reliable sources. You've only provided a single source with questionable wording written by someone who has no archaeological qualifications.
2374:
in 1982 is held as the definitive sovereign moment, not the Balfour Declaration etc. There are other examples (many common across the () Dominions); for instance the
2625:
1846:
It is not a little clearer, in fact it is grammatically poor, and presumes the average reader is a moron. Furthermore I'm done discussing it. Have a good day.
1790:
Hacker is the central character of the show. How could anyone know of this show and not know who he is? Regardless, the information is already in the article.
1952:
gained city status on the talk page of the article on Stirling. Also, thank you for the other interesting information you put there in response to my query.
593:
I have checked many Reliable Sources on this, including written text and online text. Every RS I have found uses "sun". I have not found any that say "son".
1818:
No presumption at all. The information is readily available in the article, the reader only needs to read it. This is an encyclopedia, not a kindergarten.
1697:
by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
1299:
819:
I need to edit an article as part of an assignment for my class, so I will be adding this information with the citation. Thank you for your revisions.
233:
You have given an assertion that has been refuted by RS, but have no offered no RS to support your assertion therefore you assertion can only be POV.
858:
Friesen, Gerald. "Maintaining the Old Order 1805-44." In The Canadian Prairies a History, 80. Student ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1987.
2229:
You should know that we go by what reliable sources say. If most of the recent ones say settlement/colony, fine. But I don't think that's the case.
1305:
Capitalisation is irrelevant in any case. Christianity is a monotheistic religion. The concept of God, and the person of God are indistinguishable.
1285:
2) Lower case letters hadn't been invented when the creed was formulated, so in the original text there couldn't be a concept of a capital letter.
392:
227:
You have so far offered no basis for you assertion other than your own POV. Just offer one RS to support you assertion and the discussion is ended.
2375:
1390:
2309:
No it was not an error. Your edit did not produce the result on the article that you claim. I reviewed it carefully and reverted the inaccuracy.
1832:
Holy crap, you think I’m trying to turn this into a kindergarten? I know you can just keep reading, but it’s a little clearer with it included.
1323:
True, and I have no disagreements with that statement. However, your reasoning in the edit summary for your revision at 15:27, 5 March 2017 of
1804:
That’s a little presumptuous, you shouldn’t assume that only people who are familiar with the show to any extent will be reading the article.
811:
There is, in fact, evidence of the Selkirk colonists leaving the settlement. From Gerald Friesen's The Canadian Prairies: A History page 80:
2392:(Apologies also if I have done this "talk" mechanism incorrectly - though I edit Knowledge frequently I rarely engage in the talk feature).
2493:
1156:
You do realize tha in the time you've spent ranting matter here, you could already have created the article and resolved the issue. Peace.
921:
assertion that the information is somehow inapropriate. As for being in violation of WP:3RR, you started the reversion war, not me. Peace.
1740:
835:
1134:
substance. If you are so concerned, why don't you create the article? I realise creation is more difficult than destruction, but still.
2512:
1033:
The edit was unsourced, and completely irrelevant to the article in any case. There is absolutely no reason for its inclusion. Peace.
625:
581:
108:
67:
529:
1427:
703:
Very well, I'm Flemish, and although I've never heard the regional names, I'll believe you. The thing is, the link still refers to
2084:
then you may do so. If the editors come to a consensus to include them then they may be added. Follow the correct process please.
101:
article - looking at - and most wikipedia articles can be deleted - because very few have proper references to everything stated.
2548:
before (that's before) making any changes to that article re: what is being discussed. That's how all of us are supposed to act.
2045:
1994:
since the article is on a subject with a "strong national tie" to the United Kingdom, then British English spelling is retained.
294:
Obviously you don't appreciate my sense of humour. I was being ironic. I understood my comment was childish. It wasn't sarcasm.
2489:
2028:
1739:
related to a previous editor's contribution. Sometimes reverting is unavoidable but Knowledge is primarily about cooperation.--
1734:. In this case, you reverted (your 2nd reversion) my edit without checking to see what the content was using the edit summary:
2036:
2048:
effectively led the Arab Revolt as part of the Allies, making him at the very least equal in importance to a leader such as
776:
Thanks for the help and the edit. It is great to 'meet' a Classics and European medieval-Renaissance history buff as I am!
1971:
Artifact is spelled with an I, not an E. Did you revert it back because it's the British spelling for a British ARTIFACT?
479:
Domitius Ahenobarbus', that is, before he was renamed in with a Julio-Claudian title. All of the sources refer to him as
2464:
2476:
2014:
Can you please explain to me exactly how I'm "violating" NPOV by citing sourced historical facts? Was it by including
1386:
1059:
264:
217:
2035:
and was no longer in power, he was not executed while he was the reigning Emperor, and Alexander Kerensky only held
2382:
Worth noting en passent that many dominions didn't even adopt the Statute of Westminster until later - it took the
2288:
1422:
Did you not read what I said? And you reported me at WAI but I am no IP hopping vandal. And Pete indeed is a bear.
2366:
1182:
I am trying to discourage you from engaging in drive-by destruction. I may not succeed, but it is a worthy task.
720:
542:
448:
If you both agree, undo the removal. I don't consider it a personal favour. I consider it an act of diplomacy.
2156:)" It's a very commn way to refer to the entire territory (and in fact is shorthand for the Yukon Territory).
1744:
2582:
2553:
1382:
831:
112:
71:
391:
already been blocked once from the page for edit warring. Now another dispute resolution is underway - see
2516:
2049:
1912:
1882:
1702:
1633:
1596:
1556:
1539:
1505:
1068:
1020:
999:
876:
621:
577:
260:
213:
43:
1877:
You reverted my edit on Horatio Hornblower's nickname. Why? It's from a line in , IRC, Lord Hornblower.
2452:
2235:
2201:
1475:
525:
155:
any real significance, and for that reason the notation belongs in the section specific to the musical.
253:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Canada&curid=5042916&diff=582620772&oldid=582614368#
39:
521:
2347:
2161:
1976:
1972:
1378:
1187:
1139:
1104:
823:
792:
I agree the article needs a great deal of work. I wish I had more time to work on it myself. Cheers!
613:
569:
517:
175:
144:
104:
63:
449:
365:
336:
295:
170:
with this argument, but I don't quite understand why. Can you help me understanding your reasoning?
2277:
2192:
2069:
2032:
2015:
1058:
for block evasion. It's a long-term vandal who, for several years, is obsessed with inserting its
460:
376:
347:
306:
2578:
2549:
2073:
1833:
1805:
1776:
1694:
1690:
827:
783:
755:
678:
658:
435:
400:
274:
No hypocrisy, you have no basis for your edit, so it is reverted as any baseless edit would be.
1078:
Perhaps a note to this effect should be left on the talk page for the articles being attacked.
2592:
2564:
2526:
2435:
2404:
2383:
2310:
2244:
2212:
2172:
2085:
1995:
1908:
1893:
1878:
1847:
1819:
1791:
1756:
1698:
1686:
1644:
1627:
1608:
1590:
1568:
1550:
1533:
1518:
1499:
1438:
1403:
1351:
1306:
1260:
1213:
1157:
1116:
1079:
1064:
1034:
1013:
992:
967:
949:
922:
910:
872:
793:
690:
646:
617:
594:
573:
545:
412:
318:
275:
234:
185:
156:
83:
2577:
As the reverter without discussing, your opinion of your own behavior isn't that valuable. --
1549:
nm, I've handled it on the talk page there, which is where the discussion should be anyway.
2483:
2448:
2269:
2230:
2196:
2113:
2019:
1991:
1957:
1837:
1809:
1780:
1582:
1468:
1333:
1295:
941:
653:
links to the current region of Flanders (i.e. the northernmost part of Belgium), and not to
2463:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2343:
2157:
2149:
2052:, who IS included. Finally, what would be the issue with including each of the individual
1987:
1934:
1274:
1183:
1135:
1100:
708:
654:
171:
140:
1929:
Thanks for fixing my gaffe, misread a source and didn't get to fix that error in editing.
1212:
I'm following Knowledge policy, if you don't like it talk to an administrator. I'm done.
184:
I've already stated my position and the reason for it, I see no reason to reiterate it.
2460:
2273:
1730:. Just be aware that this is sometimes (though not always) grounds for complaint under
1713:
1249:
724:
2456:
1731:
1622:
1586:
902:
886:
779:
751:
674:
431:
396:
256:
2386:
to jolt Australia from its British identity, and in NZ it wasn't passed until 1947.
25:
2065:
2057:
2053:
1324:
945:
944:
comes to mind), and that 3RR can be found to apply regardless of who "started" it.
906:
2427:
1288:
Nonetheless, your changes happen to conform to Knowledge's Manual Of Style (MOS).
208:
Please discuss. The edit was non-consensus and the discussion is ongoing Quite a
2061:
2041:
2024:
1953:
1727:
1643:
so you are saying I was right in the first place. Thank you and have a good day.
1329:
1291:
2371:
1930:
1241:
736:
2100:
1892:
If there is a source for your assertion, then you need to source it. Peace.
1726:
Hello, You have recently carried out 3 reversions without any discussion on
1245:
2600:
2586:
2572:
2557:
2534:
2520:
2497:
2412:
2351:
2318:
2281:
2252:
2238:
2220:
2204:
2180:
2165:
2093:
2077:
2003:
1980:
1961:
1938:
1916:
1901:
1886:
1855:
1841:
1827:
1813:
1799:
1784:
1764:
1748:
1706:
1652:
1638:
1616:
1601:
1576:
1561:
1544:
1526:
1510:
1482:
1446:
1431:
1411:
1394:
1359:
1337:
1314:
1268:
1253:
1221:
1191:
1165:
1143:
1124:
1108:
1087:
1072:
1042:
1027:
1006:
975:
953:
930:
914:
880:
839:
801:
787:
759:
698:
682:
629:
602:
585:
553:
533:
464:
439:
420:
404:
380:
351:
326:
310:
283:
268:
242:
221:
193:
179:
164:
148:
116:
91:
75:
47:
2335:
earlier work), and an edit comment is a bad place for that. My apologies.
1949:
743:
704:
650:
82:
You're right, both unsourced edits should have been removed. My mistake.
2467:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
748:
Even as a Belgian I had to think that one through; stupid politicians...
2445:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1461:
664:
2327:...I think I see the confusion here, and it's my fault. When I made
1621:
I removed material. You don't need sources to remove material. And
733:
the northern federated state of Belgium with Brussels as its capital.
668:
209:
2545:
255:
The previous edit was exactly the same. Apparently you don't honour
2211:
basis. If they were people living there, then it was a settlement.
1275:'Original text of the creed has the word "Deum" (God), capitalized'
2106:
From the first sentence of our article on the subject: "River]]]]
1736:
Inaccurate, "Yellowknifes" is the correct name of the people group
1676:
2171:
Yes, but "Yukon" is the formal and more correct in this context.
2480:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
2470:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
1244:. Major changes recently that have the wording all messed up.--
966:
I have satisfied the burden of evidence. The matter is closed.
2439:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
1491:
259:
equally or is it just me that you act hypocritically toward?
1693:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the
1675:
393:
Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Highland_Clearances
475:
I can't find any sources which refer to the young Nero as '
1755:
register an account instead of just using an ISP. Peace.
2305:
Thanks, NapoliRoma (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
2451:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2328:
642:
252:
871:
You beat me to it. I was just about to restore that.
38:
Good thing you caught the Canadian Flag being wrong
663:
Flanders a region of Europe that overlies parts of
2116:
1350:All of which is still irrelevant. Have a good day.
1990:for the word that Americans spell "Artifact". Per
1532:talk page, since there is an ongoing discussion.
897:it, and then in theory you should have started a
1282:1) The original text has the word "Θεόν" (God).
2591:Your edit was literally nonsense. Case closed.
1716:}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
1259:I'll look in on it, time permitting. Thanks.
8:
2119:
2422:
2125:
1376:
1948:Thank you for enlightening me about when
335:OK. Hope you enjoy the rest of your day.
1925:Highlander: The Source article reversion
2624:was invoked but never defined (see the
2610:
2389:Very happy to discuss if you disagree!
2376:Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
905:, which you're in danger of violating.
851:
1986:"Artefact" is the correct spelling in
1775:Suppose you don't know who Hacker is.
2148:
2128:
2122:
657:, which was originally a part of the
500:In the Chapter on Nero in Suetonius'
7:
2436:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
2044:was a crucial aspect of the war and
2616:
2419:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
1424:2600:1:F146:8438:45F:B6B1:E96D:7AC6
1689:has smiled at you! Smiles promote
719:name for that region in France is
14:
1581:Again, you need to actually read
1063:a lot of angst and frustration.--
2426:
2270:Talk:World_War_I#Hussein_bin_Ali
2191:A base is not a settlement. See
2112:
1460:
641:Hello, Mediatech492; I saw your
24:
2474:and submit your choices on the
609:Tragedy of Richard the Third"
1962:15:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
1939:01:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
1467:for reverting unhelpful edits
637:Remembrance poppy and Flanders
630:22:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
603:18:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
586:21:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
194:09:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
180:06:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
165:21:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
149:19:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
1:
2498:02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
2453:Knowledge arbitration process
2352:21:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
2319:19:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
2253:14:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
2239:07:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
2221:16:59, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
2205:16:52, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
2181:03:19, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
2166:02:57, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
2094:21:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
2078:21:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
1944:Thank you for enlightening me
1765:15:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
1749:11:04, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
1269:08:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
1254:07:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
284:03:31, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
269:03:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
243:05:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
222:05:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
117:18:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
92:21:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
76:17:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
2282:10:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
2004:20:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
1981:19:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
1712:Smile at others by adding {{
1240:Your expertise is needed at
1222:20:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
1192:20:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
1166:20:42, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
1144:20:37, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
1125:20:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
1109:20:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
1088:02:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
1073:23:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
840:17:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
802:14:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
788:02:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
760:10:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
699:20:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
683:09:50, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
2360:Statute of Westminster 1931
1917:14:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
1902:13:26, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
1887:07:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
1722:Reverting unsupported edits
731:designation of Flanders is
2647:
2544:Hello! Please see and use
2490:MediaWiki message delivery
2413:23:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
2289:The Rolling Stones (novel)
1967:The Stone of Scone article
471:Minor edit on Nero article
440:14:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
421:16:46, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
137:and its musical adaptation
2601:19:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
2587:17:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
2573:22:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
2558:20:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
2521:04:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
2367:Parliamentary Sovereignty
1856:00:05, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
1842:23:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
1828:23:45, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
1814:23:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
1800:23:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
1785:23:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
1707:21:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
1653:23:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
1639:23:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
1617:23:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
1602:23:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
1577:23:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
1562:23:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
1545:23:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
1527:22:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
1511:21:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
1483:17:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
1447:17:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
1432:17:38, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
1360:15:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
1338:13:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
1315:19:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
1300:19:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
1043:16:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
1028:16:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
1007:16:43, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
976:14:44, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
954:14:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
931:19:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
915:18:51, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
885:You might want to review
881:16:41, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
554:17:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
534:17:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
465:11:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
405:20:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
381:19:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
352:17:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
327:17:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
311:16:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
48:03:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
32:The Barnstar of Diplomacy
23:
2596:
2568:
2535:09:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
2530:
2488:to your user talk page.
2408:
2314:
2248:
2216:
2176:
2089:
1999:
1897:
1851:
1823:
1795:
1760:
1648:
1612:
1572:
1522:
1453:Some bubble tea for you!
1442:
1412:01:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
1407:
1395:01:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
1355:
1310:
1264:
1217:
1161:
1120:
1083:
1038:
971:
926:
797:
694:
598:
549:
543:Knowledge:Editing policy
416:
322:
279:
238:
189:
160:
87:
2152:; also commonly called
483:Domitius Ahenobarbus.
2050:Ferdinand I of Romania
1680:
2449:Arbitration Committee
2433:Hello! Voting in the
2031:over a year after he
1679:
1671:SMILE!! 31 JULY 2017
723:(which also includes
2620:The named reference
1060:WP:original research
1049:Just to let you know
807:Battle of Seven Oaks
491:, Tacitus states: '
2302:Was this in error?
2016:Paul von Hindenburg
17:A barnstar for you!
2465:arbitration policy
1870:Horatio Hornblower
1683:Hello Mediatech492
1681:
893:added material, I
659:County of Flanders
502:The Twelve Caesars
2504:
2503:
2384:fall of Singapore
1718:
1488:
1487:
1397:
1383:21st century pict
1381:comment added by
1330:Vincent J. Lipsio
1292:Vincent J. Lipsio
843:
826:comment added by
749:
715:wrong, since the
647:Remembrance poppy
633:
616:comment added by
589:
572:comment added by
537:
520:comment added by
107:comment added by
66:comment added by
56:Sulla - unsourced
53:
52:
2638:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2623:
2622:canlii-yukon-act
2615:
2487:
2430:
2423:
2233:
2199:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2134:
2131:
2130:
2127:
2124:
2121:
2118:
2020:Erich Ludendorff
1710:
1481:
1478:
1471:
1464:
1457:
1456:
1402:further. Peace.
1024:
1018:
1003:
997:
859:
856:
842:
820:
747:
632:
610:
588:
566:
536:
514:
457:
456:
455:
373:
372:
371:
344:
343:
342:
303:
302:
301:
119:
78:
28:
21:
20:
2646:
2645:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2621:
2619:
2617:
2612:
2542:
2509:
2481:
2421:
2362:
2292:
2287:Your revert on
2265:
2231:
2197:
2189:
2145:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2115:
2111:
2104:
2012:
1988:British English
1969:
1946:
1927:
1872:
1773:
1724:
1719:
1673:
1495:
1476:
1473:
1469:
1455:
1420:
1372:
1277:
1238:
1096:
1051:
1022:
1014:
1001:
993:
988:
869:
864:
863:
862:
857:
853:
821:
809:
770:
709:French Flanders
655:French Flanders
639:
611:
567:
562:
515:
504:, he states: '
473:
453:
451:
450:
369:
367:
366:
340:
338:
337:
299:
297:
296:
292:
206:
135:Les Misérables
128:
102:
61:
58:
19:
12:
11:
5:
2644:
2642:
2633:
2632:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2604:
2603:
2546:this talk page
2541:
2538:
2508:
2505:
2502:
2501:
2472:the candidates
2442:eligible users
2431:
2420:
2417:
2416:
2415:
2361:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2355:
2354:
2340:
2336:
2329:edit 883569037
2322:
2321:
2291:
2285:
2264:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2224:
2223:
2188:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2103:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2011:
2008:
2007:
2006:
1968:
1965:
1945:
1942:
1926:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1871:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1772:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1723:
1720:
1709:
1674:
1672:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1626:is that way.
1604:
1494:
1489:
1486:
1485:
1465:
1454:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1419:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1371:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1318:
1317:
1276:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1237:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1173:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1128:
1127:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1050:
1047:
1046:
1045:
987:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
959:
958:
957:
956:
934:
933:
868:
865:
861:
860:
850:
849:
845:
808:
805:
769:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
740:Flemish Region
725:French Hainaut
645:of my edit on
638:
635:
606:
605:
561:
558:
557:
556:
499:
487:In Book XI of
486:
472:
469:
468:
467:
445:
444:
443:
442:
424:
423:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
357:
356:
355:
354:
330:
329:
291:
288:
287:
286:
261:Walter Görlitz
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
214:Walter Görlitz
205:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
131:Victor Hugo's
127:
124:
123:
122:
121:
120:
95:
94:
57:
54:
51:
50:
35:
34:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2643:
2627:
2614:
2611:
2602:
2598:
2594:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2579:SergeWoodzing
2576:
2575:
2574:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2559:
2555:
2551:
2550:SergeWoodzing
2547:
2539:
2537:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2523:
2522:
2518:
2514:
2506:
2500:
2499:
2495:
2491:
2485:
2479:
2478:
2473:
2468:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2450:
2444:
2443:
2438:
2437:
2432:
2429:
2425:
2424:
2418:
2414:
2410:
2406:
2401:
2400:
2399:
2396:
2393:
2390:
2387:
2385:
2380:
2377:
2373:
2368:
2359:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2334:
2330:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2303:
2300:
2296:
2290:
2286:
2284:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2262:
2254:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2237:
2234:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2203:
2200:
2194:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2150:
2139:
2133:
2109:
2102:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2082:
2081:
2080:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2021:
2017:
2009:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1966:
1964:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1943:
1941:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1924:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1875:
1869:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1825:
1821:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1802:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1758:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1741:185.2.196.103
1737:
1733:
1729:
1721:
1717:
1715:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1678:
1670:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1637:
1636:
1631:
1630:
1624:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1599:
1594:
1593:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1554:
1553:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1543:
1542:
1537:
1536:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1509:
1508:
1503:
1502:
1493:
1490:
1484:
1479:
1472:
1470:🐦Do☭torWho42
1466:
1463:
1459:
1458:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1369:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1326:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1286:
1283:
1280:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1235:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1026:
1019:
1017:
1009:
1008:
1005:
998:
996:
985:
977:
973:
969:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
955:
951:
947:
943:
938:
937:
936:
935:
932:
928:
924:
919:
918:
917:
916:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
883:
882:
878:
874:
866:
855:
852:
848:
844:
841:
837:
833:
829:
828:Justo Mendoza
825:
817:
815:
812:
806:
804:
803:
799:
795:
790:
789:
785:
781:
777:
774:
767:
761:
757:
753:
745:
741:
737:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
707:, and not to
706:
702:
701:
700:
696:
692:
687:
686:
685:
684:
680:
676:
671:
670:
666:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
636:
634:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:
590:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
559:
555:
551:
547:
544:
540:
539:
538:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
512:
507:
503:
497:
495:
490:
484:
482:
478:
470:
466:
462:
458:
447:
446:
441:
437:
433:
428:
427:
426:
425:
422:
418:
414:
409:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
394:
382:
378:
374:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
353:
349:
345:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
324:
320:
315:
314:
313:
312:
308:
304:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
244:
240:
236:
232:
231:
229:
228:
226:
225:
224:
223:
219:
215:
211:
203:
195:
191:
187:
183:
182:
181:
177:
173:
168:
167:
166:
162:
158:
153:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
125:
118:
114:
110:
106:
99:
98:
97:
96:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
79:
77:
73:
69:
65:
55:
49:
45:
41:
37:
36:
33:
30:
27:
22:
16:
2618:Cite error:
2613:
2593:Mediatech492
2565:Mediatech492
2543:
2527:Mediatech492
2524:
2513:50.111.44.55
2510:
2475:
2469:
2446:
2440:
2434:
2405:Mediatech492
2397:
2394:
2391:
2388:
2381:
2363:
2332:
2311:Mediatech492
2304:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2266:
2245:Mediatech492
2213:Mediatech492
2190:
2173:Mediatech492
2153:
2107:
2105:
2086:Mediatech492
2066:Djemal Pasha
2058:Talaat Pasha
2054:Three Pashas
2013:
1996:Mediatech492
1970:
1947:
1928:
1909:Murgatroyd49
1894:Mediatech492
1879:Murgatroyd49
1876:
1873:
1848:Mediatech492
1820:Mediatech492
1792:Mediatech492
1774:
1771:Yes Minister
1757:Mediatech492
1735:
1725:
1711:
1699:Me-123567-Me
1687:Me-123567-Me
1682:
1645:Mediatech492
1634:
1629:Dennis Brown
1628:
1609:Mediatech492
1597:
1592:Dennis Brown
1591:
1569:Mediatech492
1557:
1552:Dennis Brown
1551:
1540:
1535:Dennis Brown
1534:
1519:Mediatech492
1506:
1501:Dennis Brown
1500:
1496:
1439:Mediatech492
1421:
1404:Mediatech492
1377:— Preceding
1373:
1352:Mediatech492
1325:Christianity
1307:Mediatech492
1290:
1287:
1284:
1281:
1278:
1261:Mediatech492
1239:
1214:Mediatech492
1158:Mediatech492
1117:Mediatech492
1097:
1080:Mediatech492
1055:
1052:
1035:Mediatech492
1015:
1010:
994:
989:
968:Mediatech492
923:Mediatech492
898:
894:
890:
884:
873:Andy Dingley
870:
854:
846:
822:— Preceding
818:
816:
813:
810:
794:Mediatech492
791:
778:
775:
771:
739:
732:
728:
716:
712:
691:Mediatech492
662:
640:
618:Hawthornbush
612:— Preceding
607:
595:Mediatech492
574:Hawthornbush
568:— Preceding
563:
546:Mediatech492
516:— Preceding
509:
505:
501:
498:
492:
488:
485:
480:
476:
474:
413:Mediatech492
389:
319:Mediatech492
293:
276:Mediatech492
251:
235:Mediatech492
207:
186:Mediatech492
157:Mediatech492
136:
132:
129:
126:Jean Valjean
109:2.223.184.11
103:— Preceding
84:Mediatech492
68:2.223.184.11
62:— Preceding
59:
40:WWIImaster22
31:
2477:voting page
2232:Doug Weller
2198:Doug Weller
2062:Enver Pasha
2042:Arab Revolt
2025:Nicholas II
2010:"POV Edits"
1728:Yellowknife
1714:subst:Smile
1375:nonsense.
1094:HMS Avenger
1056:immediately
727:), and the
560:Richard III
522:Saint.clare
2540:March 2024
2461:topic bans
2372:Patriation
2344:NapoliRoma
2268:Hejaz) at
2263:WW1 Leades
2158:Beeblebrox
2037:leadership
1973:Wikifan128
1242:Patriation
1236:Patriation
1184:Acad Ronin
1136:Acad Ronin
1101:Acad Ronin
899:discussion
847:References
713:officially
172:jhawkinson
141:jhawkinson
2626:help page
2457:site bans
2154:the Yukon
2101:The Yukon
2046:Hussein I
2033:abdicated
1992:WP:ENGVAR
1583:WP:BURDEN
1115:purpose.
986:Relevance
942:WP:BURDEN
210:META:DICK
2342:Thanks,
2070:Salociin
1950:Stirling
1695:WikiLove
1691:WikiLove
1391:contribs
1379:unsigned
895:reverted
836:contribs
824:unsigned
780:Leecorp1
768:Augustus
752:Kthoelen
744:Flanders
729:official
717:official
705:Flanders
675:Kthoelen
651:Flanders
626:contribs
614:unsigned
582:contribs
570:unsigned
530:contribs
518:unsigned
432:Camerojo
397:Camerojo
204:WHAT THE
105:unsigned
64:unsigned
2484:NoACEMM
2398:Lucius
2187:Vinland
2146:French:
1418:Summary
1370:MacBeth
1065:Mr Fink
946:DonIago
907:DonIago
867:Quadium
665:Belgium
511:Lucius.
2274:Havsjö
2064:, and
2029:killed
1954:Vorbee
1834:Esszet
1806:Esszet
1777:Esszet
1732:WP:3RR
1625:-: -->
1623:WP:ANI
1587:WP:BRD
1016:Dustin
995:Dustin
903:WP:3RR
891:boldly
889:. You
887:WP:BRD
746:does.
738:) The
669:France
643:revert
489:Annals
481:Lucius
477:Marcus
290:Humour
257:WP:BRD
212:move.
2395:Best
2339:mind.
2108:Yukon
1931:Wzrd1
508:' '
494:Nero.
452:Felis
368:Felis
339:Felis
298:Felis
133:novel
2597:talk
2583:talk
2569:talk
2554:talk
2531:talk
2517:talk
2494:talk
2447:The
2409:talk
2348:talk
2333:much
2315:talk
2278:talk
2249:talk
2236:talk
2217:talk
2202:talk
2193:this
2177:talk
2162:talk
2090:talk
2074:talk
2027:was
2018:and
2000:talk
1977:talk
1958:talk
1935:talk
1913:talk
1898:talk
1883:talk
1852:talk
1838:talk
1824:talk
1810:talk
1796:talk
1781:talk
1761:talk
1745:talk
1703:talk
1649:talk
1613:talk
1585:and
1573:talk
1523:talk
1443:talk
1428:talk
1408:talk
1387:talk
1356:talk
1334:talk
1311:talk
1296:talk
1279:No:
1265:talk
1250:talk
1246:Moxy
1218:talk
1188:talk
1162:talk
1140:talk
1121:talk
1105:talk
1084:talk
1069:talk
1039:talk
1023:talk
1002:talk
972:talk
950:talk
927:talk
911:talk
877:talk
832:talk
798:talk
784:talk
756:talk
721:Nord
695:talk
679:talk
667:and
622:talk
599:talk
578:talk
550:talk
526:talk
461:talk
454:Read
436:talk
417:talk
401:talk
377:talk
370:Read
348:talk
341:Read
323:talk
307:talk
300:Read
280:talk
265:talk
239:talk
218:talk
190:talk
176:talk
161:talk
145:talk
113:talk
88:talk
72:talk
44:talk
2507:POV
2120:juː
1874:Hi
1492:Cat
513:'
2628:).
2599:)
2585:)
2571:)
2556:)
2533:)
2519:)
2496:)
2486:}}
2482:{{
2459:,
2411:)
2350:)
2317:)
2280:)
2272:--
2251:)
2219:)
2179:)
2164:)
2144:;
2092:)
2076:)
2060:,
2056:,
2002:)
1979:)
1960:)
1937:)
1915:)
1900:)
1885:)
1854:)
1840:)
1826:)
1812:)
1798:)
1783:)
1763:)
1747:)
1705:)
1685:,
1651:)
1635:2¢
1632:-
1615:)
1598:2¢
1595:-
1575:)
1558:2¢
1555:-
1541:2¢
1538:-
1525:)
1507:2¢
1504:-
1445:)
1430:)
1410:)
1393:)
1389:•
1358:)
1336:)
1313:)
1298:)
1267:)
1252:)
1220:)
1190:)
1164:)
1142:)
1123:)
1107:)
1086:)
1071:)
1041:)
974:)
952:)
929:)
913:)
879:)
838:)
834:•
800:)
786:)
758:)
750:-
697:)
681:)
628:)
624:•
601:)
584:)
580:•
552:)
532:)
528:•
496:'
463:)
438:)
419:)
403:)
379:)
350:)
325:)
309:)
282:)
267:)
241:)
220:)
192:)
178:)
163:)
147:)
115:)
90:)
74:)
46:)
2595:(
2581:(
2567:(
2552:(
2529:(
2515:(
2492:(
2407:(
2346:(
2313:(
2276:(
2247:(
2215:(
2175:(
2160:(
2132:/
2129:n
2126:ɒ
2123:k
2117:ˈ
2114:/
2110:(
2088:(
2072:(
1998:(
1975:(
1956:(
1933:(
1911:(
1896:(
1881:(
1850:(
1836:(
1822:(
1808:(
1794:(
1779:(
1759:(
1743:(
1701:(
1647:(
1611:(
1571:(
1521:(
1480:)
1477:⭐
1474:(
1441:(
1426:(
1406:(
1385:(
1354:(
1332:(
1309:(
1294:(
1263:(
1248:(
1216:(
1186:(
1160:(
1138:(
1119:(
1103:(
1082:(
1067:(
1037:(
1025:)
1021:(
1004:)
1000:(
970:(
948:(
940:(
925:(
909:(
875:(
830:(
796:(
782:(
754:(
735:(
693:(
677:(
620:(
597:(
576:(
548:(
524:(
459:(
434:(
415:(
399:(
375:(
346:(
321:(
305:(
278:(
263:(
237:(
216:(
188:(
174:(
159:(
143:(
111:(
86:(
70:(
42:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.