Knowledge

User talk:Mediatech492

Source 📝

773:'Augustus', a cognomen that was used after the First Settlement in 27 BC. But the article, while well written, is confusing because most of the info in the article that comes after this section in the article where I made the change is "prior" to 27 BC, and even the actual name change in the article is below this section in the article where I made the name change to 'Octavian'. What I am saying is that the article is not written completely chronologically, and that confused me. 814:"On the morrow of the clash, the settlers, broken by the loss of family and friends and by the sight of the mutilated bodies, hastened to collect their belongings and depart. Cuthbert Grant, once more a clerk rather than a war captain, took an inventory of the goods left behind, signed the lists of thousands of items for hours on end, and, then, after two days of these last details, he watched the colonists sail northward, leaving his metis once more in command of the forks." 26: 2428: 139:." Given that, do you still think it's information that should be relegated to a bullet at the bottom of the article? What if the note in the lede clarified it was specific to the musical? In any event, it's much better now than before. This edit started as a discussion with some colleagues who had forgotten the number and looked at the Knowledge page and were surprised it did not help them. 395:. The reason I reinstated the remark of FelisRead that you deleted was that I felt that it should be present and visible during the dispute resolution process. It is a good reflection of the difficulty that I and all other editors have had attempting to deal with him. By deleting his comment, you have inadvertently done him a favour that he does not deserve. -- 1462: 430:
I think it would have been easier for the volunteer to have made a more accurate assessment if FelisRead's comments had been left in place. I fear that FelisRead may be encouraged by the volunteer's comment to continue his aggressive and uncivil (he would claim humorous) attitude. I would encourage you to continue monitoring this page. --
1677: 2068:, rather than just using what is in effect a disambiguation link? Considering how much larger the Allied side of the infobox is, it isn't as if it makes it any more bloated or overly long. Can you please explain to me what the major issues are, which individual edits were in "violation" and how to work around them? Thank you. 689:
the geographic region. The Belgians officially refer to their portion of Flanders as "the Flemish Region" and the French divide their portion into two areas called "French Westhoek" and "Lilloise Flanders". These are terms atha are currently in use in addition to being historically relevant. So my edit was correct. Cheers!
661:, but was never part of the current region of Flanders (the latter name has been generalized to suit the whole northernmost part of Belgium, and not just the historical region of the County of Flanders). In WWI, there was fighting across this border between France and Belgium, of course, but to say that 2083:
Your POV is that "it is your own opinion" that they should be included there. That list as it stands has been developed as an ongoing process by the consensus of multiple editors, who have has multiple discussions about it over several years. IF you want to reopen this discussion on the the talk page
2039:
between the months of July and November 1917, so I don't understand why documenting those facts in notes, citing Nicholas II's abdication date as the end of his involvement in the war and removing the execution link, and specifying Kerensky's time in office, is in violation of anything. Likewise, the
1754:
Yes, I reverted some edits. They were of a dubious nature and had no sourcing or explanation, so their reversion was perfectly justifiable. If you want the cooperation with other editors you need to communicate what you are doing. Also, if you want to be taken seriously as a WP editor you may want to
1531:
Being an admin, I'm pretty up on policy and you are as wrong as it comes. You reverted back material that has bad sources and is original research. I REMOVED material for the most part. You need to self revert. If you have a question about any extra part I added, remove that part only and use the
1497:
I reverted you on cat. My changes were based on a request, a request I agreed with and made, and the discussion is on the talk page. The sources and claims were weak, not reliable and original research. It is a bit rude to just revert without giving an explanation or without checking the talk page
1133:
Nonsense. Frequently I come across information that would be of interest to people in the area. A list page can be a place to park it, especially when there is not enough info to warrant all but a stubby article that would be no longer than the material you destroyed. Your actions privilege form over
1062:
opinion into various articles, and, from my own personal experience with it over the years, is physically incapable of discussing or interacting with other editors beyond whining that "Pete is a wolf" and edit-warring to protect its original research nonsense. I just want to let you know to save you
429:
The dispute resolution is over - and we received some good guidance. However one of the comments made by the volunteer mediator was "All participants have behaved well under the pressure of long debate and have remained, commendably civil." I think that is true of all other editors but not FelisRead.
2267:
First of all, i would like to apologize, I thought you were the same person who added Robert Nivelle (without consensus and going against the "highest leaders only") when you reverted and asked me to find consensus! Secondly, I did now add a talk section for the inclusion of Hussein bin Ali (King of
1566:
You claim to be up on policy but you give no reason to say how I am wrong which makes me question your authority on this or any other matter. I don't need to involve myself in the discussion, because it is irrelevant. No source = Reversion, regardless of what is happening on the talk page. There was
608:
It's really interesting - I always took it as read that it was 'Son' and was surprised to find so many references to 'sun' - both online and printed. All I would suggest is looking at the (apparent!) original text linked to from this page:- "Wikisource has original text related to this article: The
688:
Sorry but you are wrong. Flanders is a geographically defined region, not a political entity with borders. The French people to this day still use the term "Flanders" in reference to that part of the region in their own territory. Belgian Flanders and French Flanders combine to form the totality of
169:
I would argue that because it is such a significant part of the character in the musical, then IF indeed the article is about both the musical and the book, it deserves to be in the lede. If the article were different (e.g. it had a different hatnote), I'd feel othewise. It sounds like you disagree
154:
As I stated, the number only appears twice in the book, both time in offhand reference and has no real significance to the storyline. Likewise it is either not mentioned or only casually referenced in any of the movies based on the book, except for the musical. It is only in the musical that it has
772:
I changed the named to 'Octavian' because, as you see, under the section in the article where I made the change, the name 'Octavian' is still used. However, if the section where I made the change states and depicts occurrences that happened in 20 BC, you are correct because by 20 BC he was already
2210:
Semantic nonsense. You presume to know what was in the minds of the Vinland settlers based on non-existent evidence. We can only surmise the purpose of the site based on the archaeological data. The fact that they build permanent structures indicted that they intended to live there on a long term
1374:
So what do you know about MacBeth ? what do you mean comments not constructive ? you have obviously no local knowledge on the subject. here MacBeth is still considered a great Scottish king tared by Shakespeare pandering to King James and the majority you, still thinking he murdered Duncan its
130:
Thanks for your edit; I'm definitely not knowledgeable about the book. When I added the 24601 note to the lede, I considered that it was likely the book didn't place the same emphasis on the number, but decided it was OK (either way) because of the hatnote, "This article is about the character in
2338:
It sounds like we both agree the article should note that this is a quote from Exodus, so I'm going to restore my edits (which will also restore the citation I'd filled in), with a minor edit for clarity and a better edit summary. Please check to make sure the resulting copy is accurate to your
1738:
even though an inspection would have shown that this was not part of the content of previous or reverted content. You actually reverted only the formatting which I had clearly spelled out in my edit summary but which you failed to appreciate. Please be so good as to reinstate my edit, which had
920:
Correction. I added easily verifiable sourced material that is valid according to the established parameters of the article. You have disputed it on the grounds of notability which you have the right to do. I have fulfilled the requirements of WP:Policy. The onus is therefore on you to prove you
1114:
The purpose of a list page is only to provide links to related articles. If you have a subpject that you think deserves further coverage then you need to create an article for it. No one is blocking you from adding an article with all relevant informations; however, list pages are not for that
2378:
was the supreme court for the Dominions until each carved out a sovereign common law by abolishing appeals - in Australia that was 1975, in New Zealand as late as 2004 etc. Accordingly, I feel strongly it should be "largely", not fully. It was a step on the journey - it wasn't the destination.
1401:
I have no opinion on the content of your edits. They were reverted because they were not properly sourced. According to Knowledge policy all edits must be supported with source references. Edits without sources can and will be removed. Use the article's Talk Page if you want to discuss content
390:
Mediatech492, normally I would welcome your intervention. However, if you look at the talk page, you will see that the person previously just known anonymously as the IP editor, and now FelisRead has been a disruptive and aggressive editor since his arrival on the page over a month ago. He has
100:
Thanks but I meant the section, Sulla's legacy section only has one reference - the rest can be removed, no? Will you back me up to delete the whole section except the sentence that is referenced? Otherwise, we are simply choosing which un-referenced sections we like? I think about 50% of the
2364:
Hi there. Appreciate you've undone my change of "fully" to "largely". Respectfully, I have stetted this back to my change. My reasoning is that it's not accurate to describe the statute as creating a series of "fully sovereign nations in their own right". For instance, the issues of Imperial
990:
Please do not pass by and revert an edit by an established user without explanation. You are held to the same standards as everyone else. All that aside, I am doubtful that that plane could be anything other than a Boeing 747. The most "dubious" part about it is the Japanese Airlines part.
410:
I cannot agree with your premise Camerojo. By restoring a maliciious edit you do him more of a favour than you claim he gains by removal. Resoultion does not require malicious edits to remain in place, they can be recovered for review without having to leave them as a disruptive element.
2022:
that apparently violated a neutral point of view? I don't seem to see why you have such a problem including them in the infobox when, quote: "Hindenburg was also appointed as Supreme War Commander of the armies of the Central Powers, with nominal control of six million men". {cite
493:
While Claudius sat to witness the games of the circus, some of the young nobility acted on horseback the battle of Troy. Among them was Britannicus, the emperor's son, and Lucius Domitius, who became soon afterwards by adoption heir to the empire with the surname of
1098:
Why did you revert my edits to the page? These are vessels that will never have an article. I cannot understand why you would patrol wikipedia looking for opportunities to throw away information in a quest for neatness. Please undo your destructive editing.
564:
Hi, I'm fairly new to this so don't even know if this is where I'm meant to be talking to you but here goes anyway! I edited 'sun of York' to 'son of York' because I think that's what Shakespeare wrote. What's your evidence to the contrary please? Regards
510:
of whom we have this tradition... This family had the honour of seven consulships, one triumph, and two censorships and being admitted into the patrician order, they continued the use of the same cognomen, with no other praenomina than those of Cneius and
316:
As per the talk page is for constructive discussion of the article, not as a platform for commedy. If you wish to use irony to reinforce a point then that is acceptable. As it was your comment was not constructive (and neither was it particularly funny).
2294:
Hi, I changed the The Rolling Stones article to flesh out a citation to a Benford essay, and to note that Heinlein didn't come up with the phrase "stranger in a strange land" on his own, since it is a quote from the Bible. I added a link to Exodus 2:22.
2195:"Birgitta Wallace from Parks Canada has persuasively argued that the site was a transit station and ship repair site at the entrance to the region of Vinland, the southern and western reaches of the Gulf of St. Lawrence." That's the current consensus. 901:. Your persistent re-insertion of the material, especially when a discussion has been initiated at the article's Talk page, is neither good faith nor in keeping with what is generally considered best practice. I might also recommend that you review 2511:" There is no such thing as a historical source that is not biased ..." - you know deep down that is rubbish. As a professional historian, I can point out many, many books that are written "by committee" to ensure both accuracy and remove biases. 1606:
DO what you think you must, I do know the policies quite well and I have done nothing wrong. Consensus is irrelevant when there are no sources. Your threats are starting to amount to harassment and if it continues any further will be reported.
1053:
If you see any user or IP that starts complaining about "Pete is a wolf" or "Why is Pete a cat? He's a wolf" don't engage it, and, instead revert literally all of the editor's/IP's recent edits, and, if it is a user, get that account blocked
1567:
an obvious discrepancy and so I reverted it. It is not my responsibility to prove anything. it is the responsibility of the original editor to show the information they provide is right; otherwise they (and you) are wrong. Enough said.
672:
is plainly wrong. That is why I tried to rewrite the sentence to explain myself better; apparently I didn't succeed. Could you please explain what you think should be done? Because now the sentence is still just wrong. Sincerely,
1011:
My main issue is that you did not leave an edit summary. Perhaps I am jumping to conclusions too easily, but you can often expect to be reverted if you just revert long-established users' good faith edits with no reason given.
1498:
for a related discussion, then explaining there. At the very least, have the courtesy to use a summary that explains why you are reverting someone with what is obviously a good faith edit based on talk page discussions.
1906:
Strictly speaking there is no source given for his other nickname in the infobox but you seem happy with that: H & the Atropos since you ask :-) Now I am going to have to read the books again to find the other one…
2331:, where I added the reference to Exodus 2:22, I included the edit comment 'Hazel was quoting "stranger in a strange land" from a somewhat earlier work'". I was trying for humorous understatement there (the Bible being a 2138: 649:. The thing is, your revert doesn't match your edit summary; since you say (rightly) that French Flanders was (!) an historical region of Flanders, but it isn't anymore nowadays (and neither was it in WWI). The article 1516:
Regardless of what you think of the old material, the material you added had no supporting sources at all. Therefore it was not an improvement, reversion in that case is mandatory and no explanation is required.
2298:
Your revert to my edits undid both the expanded citation and the reference to Exodus, and your edit comment noted that the reason for the revert was "Heinlein did not originate the phrase, it is a bible quote".
1327:
is incorrect, which is what I noted above as pedantic but meaningful points of fact; the original text is in a different language than you quoted and capitalision does not apply in the context of the original.
2471: 939:
I think you'll find that in most cases regarding disputed content, the onus is in fact on the person who wishes the material to be included to satisfy the concerns regarding whether it should be included
2369:
caused problems in certain jurisdictions - e.g. in the Dominion of Canada the Statute of Westminster was not sufficient to avoid a desire in Ottawa to advance things further - it is for this reason that
2402:
There is a big difference between between sovereignty and independence. If I had more time I might indulge in a semantic discussion, but as such I request you familiarize yourself with the distinction.
2455:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2023:
book|last1=Beach|first1=Jim|title=Haig's intelligence. GHQ and the German Army, 1916–1918|date=2013|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|page=212}} I'd also like to point out that
742:(which we don't use, as it's called "Vlaamse Gemeenschap" or "Flemish Community") you talk about, is purely a political entity (which you say correctly), and doesn't define the geography, although 230:
I have offered no POV. I am neutral. I have stated that the previous version should stay until a new consensus is reached. You're disruptive, but that's OK. It will work itself out in the end.
1437:
Article on Pete and official Disney sources say the character of Pete is a cat. The bear in the Alice shorts may have a similarity to Pete but that does not mean they are the same character.
1423: 364:
I accept your admonition. It was certainly less than constructive. I can't say it won't happen again, but I can say your removal was in good faith. Thank you for defusing the situation.
60:
I notice you removed my small sentence on his cultural barbarism as unsourced. You appear to have left the rest of the section however which is also unsourced. May I ask why? Thanks.
2441: 541:
I reverted the edit because it was unsourced. Include verifiable sourcing with the edit and it can stand. An unsourced edit is always inherently suspect and subject to deletion per
2525:
Efforts to minimize bias often introduce additional bias. I've served on enough committee to know too that they can be as bad as, if not worse than individuals for courting bias.
1589:. Revert again, and I drag you back to AN3. I'm tired of explaining to someone who won't listen or actually read the policy. Your interpretation is not consensus at Knowledge. 2563:
The edit you are advocating is literally complete nonsense, therefore must be considered test/vandalism edit and treated accordingly. Reverted without the need for discussion.
711:, which is more correct. It doesn't matter if the French call it this or that, the statement that "Flanders is a region of Europe that overlies parts of Belgium and France" is 506:
Two celebrated families, the Calvini and Aenobarbi, sprung from the race of the Domitii. The Aenobarbi derive both their extraction and their cognomen from one Lucius Domitius,
2243:
The original was based on reliable sources. You've only provided a single source with questionable wording written by someone who has no archaeological qualifications.
2374:
in 1982 is held as the definitive sovereign moment, not the Balfour Declaration etc. There are other examples (many common across the () Dominions); for instance the
2625: 1846:
It is not a little clearer, in fact it is grammatically poor, and presumes the average reader is a moron. Furthermore I'm done discussing it. Have a good day.
1790:
Hacker is the central character of the show. How could anyone know of this show and not know who he is? Regardless, the information is already in the article.
1952:
gained city status on the talk page of the article on Stirling. Also, thank you for the other interesting information you put there in response to my query.
593:
I have checked many Reliable Sources on this, including written text and online text. Every RS I have found uses "sun". I have not found any that say "son".
1818:
No presumption at all. The information is readily available in the article, the reader only needs to read it. This is an encyclopedia, not a kindergarten.
1697:
by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
1299: 819:
I need to edit an article as part of an assignment for my class, so I will be adding this information with the citation. Thank you for your revisions.
233:
You have given an assertion that has been refuted by RS, but have no offered no RS to support your assertion therefore you assertion can only be POV.
858:
Friesen, Gerald. "Maintaining the Old Order 1805-44." In The Canadian Prairies a History, 80. Student ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1987.
2229:
You should know that we go by what reliable sources say. If most of the recent ones say settlement/colony, fine. But I don't think that's the case.
1305:
Capitalisation is irrelevant in any case. Christianity is a monotheistic religion. The concept of God, and the person of God are indistinguishable.
1285:
2) Lower case letters hadn't been invented when the creed was formulated, so in the original text there couldn't be a concept of a capital letter.
392: 227:
You have so far offered no basis for you assertion other than your own POV. Just offer one RS to support you assertion and the discussion is ended.
2375: 1390: 2309:
No it was not an error. Your edit did not produce the result on the article that you claim. I reviewed it carefully and reverted the inaccuracy.
1832:
Holy crap, you think I’m trying to turn this into a kindergarten? I know you can just keep reading, but it’s a little clearer with it included.
1323:
True, and I have no disagreements with that statement. However, your reasoning in the edit summary for your revision at 15:27, 5 March 2017 of
1804:
That’s a little presumptuous, you shouldn’t assume that only people who are familiar with the show to any extent will be reading the article.
811:
There is, in fact, evidence of the Selkirk colonists leaving the settlement. From Gerald Friesen's The Canadian Prairies: A History page 80:
2392:(Apologies also if I have done this "talk" mechanism incorrectly - though I edit Knowledge frequently I rarely engage in the talk feature). 2493: 1156:
You do realize tha in the time you've spent ranting matter here, you could already have created the article and resolved the issue. Peace.
921:
assertion that the information is somehow inapropriate. As for being in violation of WP:3RR, you started the reversion war, not me. Peace.
1740: 835: 1134:
substance. If you are so concerned, why don't you create the article? I realise creation is more difficult than destruction, but still.
2512: 1033:
The edit was unsourced, and completely irrelevant to the article in any case. There is absolutely no reason for its inclusion. Peace.
625: 581: 108: 67: 529: 1427: 703:
Very well, I'm Flemish, and although I've never heard the regional names, I'll believe you. The thing is, the link still refers to
2084:
then you may do so. If the editors come to a consensus to include them then they may be added. Follow the correct process please.
101:
article - looking at - and most wikipedia articles can be deleted - because very few have proper references to everything stated.
2548:
before (that's before) making any changes to that article re: what is being discussed. That's how all of us are supposed to act.
2045: 1994:
since the article is on a subject with a "strong national tie" to the United Kingdom, then British English spelling is retained.
294:
Obviously you don't appreciate my sense of humour. I was being ironic. I understood my comment was childish. It wasn't sarcasm.
2489: 2028: 1739:
related to a previous editor's contribution. Sometimes reverting is unavoidable but Knowledge is primarily about cooperation.--
1734:. In this case, you reverted (your 2nd reversion) my edit without checking to see what the content was using the edit summary: 2036: 2048:
effectively led the Arab Revolt as part of the Allies, making him at the very least equal in importance to a leader such as
776:
Thanks for the help and the edit. It is great to 'meet' a Classics and European medieval-Renaissance history buff as I am!
1971:
Artifact is spelled with an I, not an E. Did you revert it back because it's the British spelling for a British ARTIFACT?
479:
Domitius Ahenobarbus', that is, before he was renamed in with a Julio-Claudian title. All of the sources refer to him as
2464: 2476: 2014:
Can you please explain to me exactly how I'm "violating" NPOV by citing sourced historical facts? Was it by including
1386: 1059: 264: 217: 2035:
and was no longer in power, he was not executed while he was the reigning Emperor, and Alexander Kerensky only held
2382:
Worth noting en passent that many dominions didn't even adopt the Statute of Westminster until later - it took the
2288: 1422:
Did you not read what I said? And you reported me at WAI but I am no IP hopping vandal. And Pete indeed is a bear.
2366: 1182:
I am trying to discourage you from engaging in drive-by destruction. I may not succeed, but it is a worthy task.
720: 542: 448:
If you both agree, undo the removal. I don't consider it a personal favour. I consider it an act of diplomacy.
2156:)" It's a very commn way to refer to the entire territory (and in fact is shorthand for the Yukon Territory). 1744: 2582: 2553: 1382: 831: 112: 71: 391:
already been blocked once from the page for edit warring. Now another dispute resolution is underway - see
2516: 2049: 1912: 1882: 1702: 1633: 1596: 1556: 1539: 1505: 1068: 1020: 999: 876: 621: 577: 260: 213: 43: 1877:
You reverted my edit on Horatio Hornblower's nickname. Why? It's from a line in , IRC, Lord Hornblower.
2452: 2235: 2201: 1475: 525: 155:
any real significance, and for that reason the notation belongs in the section specific to the musical.
253:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Canada&curid=5042916&diff=582620772&oldid=582614368#
39: 521: 2347: 2161: 1976: 1972: 1378: 1187: 1139: 1104: 823: 792:
I agree the article needs a great deal of work. I wish I had more time to work on it myself. Cheers!
613: 569: 517: 175: 144: 104: 63: 449: 365: 336: 295: 170:
with this argument, but I don't quite understand why. Can you help me understanding your reasoning?
2277: 2192: 2069: 2032: 2015: 1058:
for block evasion. It's a long-term vandal who, for several years, is obsessed with inserting its
460: 376: 347: 306: 2578: 2549: 2073: 1833: 1805: 1776: 1694: 1690: 827: 783: 755: 678: 658: 435: 400: 274:
No hypocrisy, you have no basis for your edit, so it is reverted as any baseless edit would be.
1078:
Perhaps a note to this effect should be left on the talk page for the articles being attacked.
2592: 2564: 2526: 2435: 2404: 2383: 2310: 2244: 2212: 2172: 2085: 1995: 1908: 1893: 1878: 1847: 1819: 1791: 1756: 1698: 1686: 1644: 1627: 1608: 1590: 1568: 1550: 1533: 1518: 1499: 1438: 1403: 1351: 1306: 1260: 1213: 1157: 1116: 1079: 1064: 1034: 1013: 992: 967: 949: 922: 910: 872: 793: 690: 646: 617: 594: 573: 545: 412: 318: 275: 234: 185: 156: 83: 2577:
As the reverter without discussing, your opinion of your own behavior isn't that valuable. --
1549:
nm, I've handled it on the talk page there, which is where the discussion should be anyway.
2483: 2448: 2269: 2230: 2196: 2113: 2019: 1991: 1957: 1837: 1809: 1780: 1582: 1468: 1333: 1295: 941: 653:
links to the current region of Flanders (i.e. the northernmost part of Belgium), and not to
2463:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2343: 2157: 2149: 2052:, who IS included. Finally, what would be the issue with including each of the individual 1987: 1934: 1274: 1183: 1135: 1100: 708: 654: 171: 140: 1929:
Thanks for fixing my gaffe, misread a source and didn't get to fix that error in editing.
1212:
I'm following Knowledge policy, if you don't like it talk to an administrator. I'm done.
184:
I've already stated my position and the reason for it, I see no reason to reiterate it.
2460: 2273: 1730:. Just be aware that this is sometimes (though not always) grounds for complaint under 1713: 1249: 724: 2456: 1731: 1622: 1586: 902: 886: 779: 751: 674: 431: 396: 256: 2386:
to jolt Australia from its British identity, and in NZ it wasn't passed until 1947.
25: 2065: 2057: 2053: 1324: 945: 944:
comes to mind), and that 3RR can be found to apply regardless of who "started" it.
906: 2427: 1288:
Nonetheless, your changes happen to conform to Knowledge's Manual Of Style (MOS).
208:
Please discuss. The edit was non-consensus and the discussion is ongoing Quite a
2061: 2041: 2024: 1953: 1727: 1643:
so you are saying I was right in the first place. Thank you and have a good day.
1329: 1291: 2371: 1930: 1241: 736: 2100: 1892:
If there is a source for your assertion, then you need to source it. Peace.
1726:
Hello, You have recently carried out 3 reversions without any discussion on
1245: 2600: 2586: 2572: 2557: 2534: 2520: 2497: 2412: 2351: 2318: 2281: 2252: 2238: 2220: 2204: 2180: 2165: 2093: 2077: 2003: 1980: 1961: 1938: 1916: 1901: 1886: 1855: 1841: 1827: 1813: 1799: 1784: 1764: 1748: 1706: 1652: 1638: 1616: 1601: 1576: 1561: 1544: 1526: 1510: 1482: 1446: 1431: 1411: 1394: 1359: 1337: 1314: 1268: 1253: 1221: 1191: 1165: 1143: 1124: 1108: 1087: 1072: 1042: 1027: 1006: 975: 953: 930: 914: 880: 839: 801: 787: 759: 698: 682: 629: 602: 585: 553: 533: 464: 439: 420: 404: 380: 351: 326: 310: 283: 268: 242: 221: 193: 179: 164: 148: 116: 91: 75: 47: 2335:
earlier work), and an edit comment is a bad place for that. My apologies.
1949: 743: 704: 650: 82:
You're right, both unsourced edits should have been removed. My mistake.
2467:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
748:
Even as a Belgian I had to think that one through; stupid politicians...
2445:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1461: 664: 2327:...I think I see the confusion here, and it's my fault. When I made 1621:
I removed material. You don't need sources to remove material. And
733:
the northern federated state of Belgium with Brussels as its capital.
668: 209: 2545: 255:
The previous edit was exactly the same. Apparently you don't honour
2211:
basis. If they were people living there, then it was a settlement.
1275:'Original text of the creed has the word "Deum" (God), capitalized' 2106:
From the first sentence of our article on the subject: "River]]]]
1736:
Inaccurate, "Yellowknifes" is the correct name of the people group
1676: 2171:
Yes, but "Yukon" is the formal and more correct in this context.
2480:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2470:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
1244:. Major changes recently that have the wording all messed up.-- 966:
I have satisfied the burden of evidence. The matter is closed.
2439:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
1491: 259:
equally or is it just me that you act hypocritically toward?
1693:
and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the
1675: 393:
Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Highland_Clearances
475:
I can't find any sources which refer to the young Nero as '
1755:
register an account instead of just using an ISP. Peace.
2305:
Thanks, NapoliRoma (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
2451:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2328: 642: 252: 871:
You beat me to it. I was just about to restore that.
38:
Good thing you caught the Canadian Flag being wrong
663:
Flanders a region of Europe that overlies parts of
2116: 1350:All of which is still irrelevant. Have a good day. 1990:for the word that Americans spell "Artifact". Per 1532:talk page, since there is an ongoing discussion. 897:it, and then in theory you should have started a 1282:1) The original text has the word "Θεόν" (God). 2591:Your edit was literally nonsense. Case closed. 1716:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 1259:I'll look in on it, time permitting. Thanks. 8: 2119: 2422: 2125: 1376: 1948:Thank you for enlightening me about when 335:OK. Hope you enjoy the rest of your day. 1925:Highlander: The Source article reversion 2624:was invoked but never defined (see the 2610: 2389:Very happy to discuss if you disagree! 2376:Judicial Committee of the Privy Council 905:, which you're in danger of violating. 851: 1986:"Artefact" is the correct spelling in 1775:Suppose you don't know who Hacker is. 2148: 2128: 2122: 657:, which was originally a part of the 500:In the Chapter on Nero in Suetonius' 7: 2436:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 2044:was a crucial aspect of the war and 2616: 2419:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 1424:2600:1:F146:8438:45F:B6B1:E96D:7AC6 1689:has smiled at you! Smiles promote 719:name for that region in France is 14: 1581:Again, you need to actually read 1063:a lot of angst and frustration.-- 2426: 2270:Talk:World_War_I#Hussein_bin_Ali 2191:A base is not a settlement. See 2112: 1460: 641:Hello, Mediatech492; I saw your 24: 2474:and submit your choices on the 609:Tragedy of Richard the Third" 1962:15:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC) 1939:01:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC) 1467:for reverting unhelpful edits 637:Remembrance poppy and Flanders 630:22:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 603:18:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC) 586:21:40, 11 September 2014 (UTC) 194:09:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC) 180:06:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC) 165:21:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 149:19:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC) 1: 2498:02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 2453:Knowledge arbitration process 2352:21:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC) 2319:19:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC) 2253:14:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 2239:07:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC) 2221:16:59, 22 December 2018 (UTC) 2205:16:52, 22 December 2018 (UTC) 2181:03:19, 12 December 2018 (UTC) 2166:02:57, 12 December 2018 (UTC) 2094:21:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC) 2078:21:42, 28 November 2018 (UTC) 1944:Thank you for enlightening me 1765:15:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC) 1749:11:04, 19 December 2017 (UTC) 1269:08:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC) 1254:07:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC) 284:03:31, 21 November 2013 (UTC) 269:03:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC) 243:05:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 222:05:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC) 117:18:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC) 92:21:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC) 76:17:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC) 2282:10:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC) 2004:20:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC) 1981:19:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC) 1712:Smile at others by adding {{ 1240:Your expertise is needed at 1222:20:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1192:20:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1166:20:42, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1144:20:37, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1125:20:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1109:20:20, 19 January 2017 (UTC) 1088:02:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC) 1073:23:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC) 840:17:48, 9 February 2015 (UTC) 802:14:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC) 788:02:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC) 760:10:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC) 699:20:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 683:09:50, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 2360:Statute of Westminster 1931 1917:14:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC) 1902:13:26, 10 August 2018 (UTC) 1887:07:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC) 1722:Reverting unsupported edits 731:designation of Flanders is 2647: 2544:Hello! Please see and use 2490:MediaWiki message delivery 2413:23:00, 21 March 2019 (UTC) 2289:The Rolling Stones (novel) 1967:The Stone of Scone article 471:Minor edit on Nero article 440:14:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC) 421:16:46, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 137:and its musical adaptation 2601:19:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC) 2587:17:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC) 2573:22:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC) 2558:20:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC) 2521:04:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 2367:Parliamentary Sovereignty 1856:00:05, 9 March 2018 (UTC) 1842:23:59, 8 March 2018 (UTC) 1828:23:45, 8 March 2018 (UTC) 1814:23:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC) 1800:23:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC) 1785:23:29, 8 March 2018 (UTC) 1707:21:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC) 1653:23:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 1639:23:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 1617:23:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 1602:23:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 1577:23:41, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 1562:23:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 1545:23:16, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 1527:22:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 1511:21:49, 26 July 2017 (UTC) 1483:17:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC) 1447:17:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC) 1432:17:38, 22 June 2017 (UTC) 1360:15:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC) 1338:13:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC) 1315:19:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 1300:19:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 1043:16:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC) 1028:16:46, 13 June 2015 (UTC) 1007:16:43, 13 June 2015 (UTC) 976:14:44, 15 June 2015 (UTC) 954:14:06, 15 June 2015 (UTC) 931:19:09, 10 June 2015 (UTC) 915:18:51, 10 June 2015 (UTC) 885:You might want to review 881:16:41, 10 June 2015 (UTC) 554:17:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 534:17:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC) 465:11:21, 9 March 2014 (UTC) 405:20:48, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 381:19:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 352:17:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 327:17:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 311:16:56, 7 March 2014 (UTC) 48:03:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC) 32:The Barnstar of Diplomacy 23: 2596: 2568: 2535:09:01, 8 July 2021 (UTC) 2530: 2488:to your user talk page. 2408: 2314: 2248: 2216: 2176: 2089: 1999: 1897: 1851: 1823: 1795: 1760: 1648: 1612: 1572: 1522: 1453:Some bubble tea for you! 1442: 1412:01:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 1407: 1395:01:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC) 1355: 1310: 1264: 1217: 1161: 1120: 1083: 1038: 971: 926: 797: 694: 598: 549: 543:Knowledge:Editing policy 416: 322: 279: 238: 189: 160: 87: 2152:; also commonly called 483:Domitius Ahenobarbus. 2050:Ferdinand I of Romania 1680: 2449:Arbitration Committee 2433:Hello! Voting in the 2031:over a year after he 1679: 1671:SMILE!! 31 JULY 2017 723:(which also includes 2620:The named reference 1060:WP:original research 1049:Just to let you know 807:Battle of Seven Oaks 491:, Tacitus states: ' 2302:Was this in error? 2016:Paul von Hindenburg 17:A barnstar for you! 2465:arbitration policy 1870:Horatio Hornblower 1683:Hello Mediatech492 1681: 893:added material, I 659:County of Flanders 502:The Twelve Caesars 2504: 2503: 2384:fall of Singapore 1718: 1488: 1487: 1397: 1383:21st century pict 1381:comment added by 1330:Vincent J. Lipsio 1292:Vincent J. Lipsio 843: 826:comment added by 749: 715:wrong, since the 647:Remembrance poppy 633: 616:comment added by 589: 572:comment added by 537: 520:comment added by 107:comment added by 66:comment added by 56:Sulla - unsourced 53: 52: 2638: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2623: 2622:canlii-yukon-act 2615: 2487: 2430: 2423: 2233: 2199: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2134: 2131: 2130: 2127: 2124: 2121: 2118: 2020:Erich Ludendorff 1710: 1481: 1478: 1471: 1464: 1457: 1456: 1402:further. Peace. 1024: 1018: 1003: 997: 859: 856: 842: 820: 747: 632: 610: 588: 566: 536: 514: 457: 456: 455: 373: 372: 371: 344: 343: 342: 303: 302: 301: 119: 78: 28: 21: 20: 2646: 2645: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2621: 2619: 2617: 2612: 2542: 2509: 2481: 2421: 2362: 2292: 2287:Your revert on 2265: 2231: 2197: 2189: 2145: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2115: 2111: 2104: 2012: 1988:British English 1969: 1946: 1927: 1872: 1773: 1724: 1719: 1673: 1495: 1476: 1473: 1469: 1455: 1420: 1372: 1277: 1238: 1096: 1051: 1022: 1014: 1001: 993: 988: 869: 864: 863: 862: 857: 853: 821: 809: 770: 709:French Flanders 655:French Flanders 639: 611: 567: 562: 515: 504:, he states: ' 473: 453: 451: 450: 369: 367: 366: 340: 338: 337: 299: 297: 296: 292: 206: 135:Les Misérables 128: 102: 61: 58: 19: 12: 11: 5: 2644: 2642: 2633: 2632: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2546:this talk page 2541: 2538: 2508: 2505: 2502: 2501: 2472:the candidates 2442:eligible users 2431: 2420: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2361: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2340: 2336: 2329:edit 883569037 2322: 2321: 2291: 2285: 2264: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2224: 2223: 2188: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2103: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2011: 2008: 2007: 2006: 1968: 1965: 1945: 1942: 1926: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1871: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1772: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1723: 1720: 1709: 1674: 1672: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1626:is that way. 1604: 1494: 1489: 1486: 1485: 1465: 1454: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1419: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1318: 1317: 1276: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1237: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1128: 1127: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1050: 1047: 1046: 1045: 987: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 959: 958: 957: 956: 934: 933: 868: 865: 861: 860: 850: 849: 845: 808: 805: 769: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 740:Flemish Region 725:French Hainaut 645:of my edit on 638: 635: 606: 605: 561: 558: 557: 556: 499: 487:In Book XI of 486: 472: 469: 468: 467: 445: 444: 443: 442: 424: 423: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 357: 356: 355: 354: 330: 329: 291: 288: 287: 286: 261:Walter Görlitz 250: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 214:Walter Görlitz 205: 202: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 131:Victor Hugo's 127: 124: 123: 122: 121: 120: 95: 94: 57: 54: 51: 50: 35: 34: 29: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2643: 2627: 2614: 2611: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2579:SergeWoodzing 2576: 2575: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2550:SergeWoodzing 2547: 2539: 2537: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2523: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2506: 2500: 2499: 2495: 2491: 2485: 2479: 2478: 2473: 2468: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2444: 2443: 2438: 2437: 2432: 2429: 2425: 2424: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2387: 2385: 2380: 2377: 2373: 2368: 2359: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2334: 2330: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2303: 2300: 2296: 2290: 2286: 2284: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2262: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2237: 2234: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2200: 2194: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2150: 2139: 2133: 2109: 2102: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2021: 2017: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1966: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1943: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1924: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1875: 1869: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1741:185.2.196.103 1737: 1733: 1729: 1721: 1717: 1715: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1678: 1670: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1637: 1636: 1631: 1630: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1605: 1603: 1600: 1599: 1594: 1593: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1560: 1559: 1554: 1553: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1542: 1537: 1536: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1509: 1508: 1503: 1502: 1493: 1490: 1484: 1479: 1472: 1470:🐦Do☭torWho42 1466: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1369: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1283: 1280: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1235: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1061: 1057: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1019: 1017: 1009: 1008: 1005: 998: 996: 985: 977: 973: 969: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 955: 951: 947: 943: 938: 937: 936: 935: 932: 928: 924: 919: 918: 917: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 883: 882: 878: 874: 866: 855: 852: 848: 844: 841: 837: 833: 829: 828:Justo Mendoza 825: 817: 815: 812: 806: 804: 803: 799: 795: 790: 789: 785: 781: 777: 774: 767: 761: 757: 753: 745: 741: 737: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 707:, and not to 706: 702: 701: 700: 696: 692: 687: 686: 685: 684: 680: 676: 671: 670: 666: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 636: 634: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 604: 600: 596: 592: 591: 590: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 559: 555: 551: 547: 544: 540: 539: 538: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 512: 507: 503: 497: 495: 490: 484: 482: 478: 470: 466: 462: 458: 447: 446: 441: 437: 433: 428: 427: 426: 425: 422: 418: 414: 409: 408: 407: 406: 402: 398: 394: 382: 378: 374: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 353: 349: 345: 334: 333: 332: 331: 328: 324: 320: 315: 314: 313: 312: 308: 304: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 272: 271: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 244: 240: 236: 232: 231: 229: 228: 226: 225: 224: 223: 219: 215: 211: 203: 195: 191: 187: 183: 182: 181: 177: 173: 168: 167: 166: 162: 158: 153: 152: 151: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 125: 118: 114: 110: 106: 99: 98: 97: 96: 93: 89: 85: 81: 80: 79: 77: 73: 69: 65: 55: 49: 45: 41: 37: 36: 33: 30: 27: 22: 16: 2618:Cite error: 2613: 2593:Mediatech492 2565:Mediatech492 2543: 2527:Mediatech492 2524: 2513:50.111.44.55 2510: 2475: 2469: 2446: 2440: 2434: 2405:Mediatech492 2397: 2394: 2391: 2388: 2381: 2363: 2332: 2311:Mediatech492 2304: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2266: 2245:Mediatech492 2213:Mediatech492 2190: 2173:Mediatech492 2153: 2107: 2105: 2086:Mediatech492 2066:Djemal Pasha 2058:Talaat Pasha 2054:Three Pashas 2013: 1996:Mediatech492 1970: 1947: 1928: 1909:Murgatroyd49 1894:Mediatech492 1879:Murgatroyd49 1876: 1873: 1848:Mediatech492 1820:Mediatech492 1792:Mediatech492 1774: 1771:Yes Minister 1757:Mediatech492 1735: 1725: 1711: 1699:Me-123567-Me 1687:Me-123567-Me 1682: 1645:Mediatech492 1634: 1629:Dennis Brown 1628: 1609:Mediatech492 1597: 1592:Dennis Brown 1591: 1569:Mediatech492 1557: 1552:Dennis Brown 1551: 1540: 1535:Dennis Brown 1534: 1519:Mediatech492 1506: 1501:Dennis Brown 1500: 1496: 1439:Mediatech492 1421: 1404:Mediatech492 1377:— Preceding 1373: 1352:Mediatech492 1325:Christianity 1307:Mediatech492 1290: 1287: 1284: 1281: 1278: 1261:Mediatech492 1239: 1214:Mediatech492 1158:Mediatech492 1117:Mediatech492 1097: 1080:Mediatech492 1055: 1052: 1035:Mediatech492 1015: 1010: 994: 989: 968:Mediatech492 923:Mediatech492 898: 894: 890: 884: 873:Andy Dingley 870: 854: 846: 822:— Preceding 818: 816: 813: 810: 794:Mediatech492 791: 778: 775: 771: 739: 732: 728: 716: 712: 691:Mediatech492 662: 640: 618:Hawthornbush 612:— Preceding 607: 595:Mediatech492 574:Hawthornbush 568:— Preceding 563: 546:Mediatech492 516:— Preceding 509: 505: 501: 498: 492: 488: 485: 480: 476: 474: 413:Mediatech492 389: 319:Mediatech492 293: 276:Mediatech492 251: 235:Mediatech492 207: 186:Mediatech492 157:Mediatech492 136: 132: 129: 126:Jean Valjean 109:2.223.184.11 103:— Preceding 84:Mediatech492 68:2.223.184.11 62:— Preceding 59: 40:WWIImaster22 31: 2477:voting page 2232:Doug Weller 2198:Doug Weller 2062:Enver Pasha 2042:Arab Revolt 2025:Nicholas II 2010:"POV Edits" 1728:Yellowknife 1714:subst:Smile 1375:nonsense. 1094:HMS Avenger 1056:immediately 727:), and the 560:Richard III 522:Saint.clare 2540:March 2024 2461:topic bans 2372:Patriation 2344:NapoliRoma 2268:Hejaz) at 2263:WW1 Leades 2158:Beeblebrox 2037:leadership 1973:Wikifan128 1242:Patriation 1236:Patriation 1184:Acad Ronin 1136:Acad Ronin 1101:Acad Ronin 899:discussion 847:References 713:officially 172:jhawkinson 141:jhawkinson 2626:help page 2457:site bans 2154:the Yukon 2101:The Yukon 2046:Hussein I 2033:abdicated 1992:WP:ENGVAR 1583:WP:BURDEN 1115:purpose. 986:Relevance 942:WP:BURDEN 210:META:DICK 2342:Thanks, 2070:Salociin 1950:Stirling 1695:WikiLove 1691:WikiLove 1391:contribs 1379:unsigned 895:reverted 836:contribs 824:unsigned 780:Leecorp1 768:Augustus 752:Kthoelen 744:Flanders 729:official 717:official 705:Flanders 675:Kthoelen 651:Flanders 626:contribs 614:unsigned 582:contribs 570:unsigned 530:contribs 518:unsigned 432:Camerojo 397:Camerojo 204:WHAT THE 105:unsigned 64:unsigned 2484:NoACEMM 2398:Lucius 2187:Vinland 2146:French: 1418:Summary 1370:MacBeth 1065:Mr Fink 946:DonIago 907:DonIago 867:Quadium 665:Belgium 511:Lucius. 2274:Havsjö 2064:, and 2029:killed 1954:Vorbee 1834:Esszet 1806:Esszet 1777:Esszet 1732:WP:3RR 1625:-: --> 1623:WP:ANI 1587:WP:BRD 1016:Dustin 995:Dustin 903:WP:3RR 891:boldly 889:. You 887:WP:BRD 746:does. 738:) The 669:France 643:revert 489:Annals 481:Lucius 477:Marcus 290:Humour 257:WP:BRD 212:move. 2395:Best 2339:mind. 2108:Yukon 1931:Wzrd1 508:' ' 494:Nero. 452:Felis 368:Felis 339:Felis 298:Felis 133:novel 2597:talk 2583:talk 2569:talk 2554:talk 2531:talk 2517:talk 2494:talk 2447:The 2409:talk 2348:talk 2333:much 2315:talk 2278:talk 2249:talk 2236:talk 2217:talk 2202:talk 2193:this 2177:talk 2162:talk 2090:talk 2074:talk 2027:was 2018:and 2000:talk 1977:talk 1958:talk 1935:talk 1913:talk 1898:talk 1883:talk 1852:talk 1838:talk 1824:talk 1810:talk 1796:talk 1781:talk 1761:talk 1745:talk 1703:talk 1649:talk 1613:talk 1585:and 1573:talk 1523:talk 1443:talk 1428:talk 1408:talk 1387:talk 1356:talk 1334:talk 1311:talk 1296:talk 1279:No: 1265:talk 1250:talk 1246:Moxy 1218:talk 1188:talk 1162:talk 1140:talk 1121:talk 1105:talk 1084:talk 1069:talk 1039:talk 1023:talk 1002:talk 972:talk 950:talk 927:talk 911:talk 877:talk 832:talk 798:talk 784:talk 756:talk 721:Nord 695:talk 679:talk 667:and 622:talk 599:talk 578:talk 550:talk 526:talk 461:talk 454:Read 436:talk 417:talk 401:talk 377:talk 370:Read 348:talk 341:Read 323:talk 307:talk 300:Read 280:talk 265:talk 239:talk 218:talk 190:talk 176:talk 161:talk 145:talk 113:talk 88:talk 72:talk 44:talk 2507:POV 2120:juː 1874:Hi 1492:Cat 513:' 2628:). 2599:) 2585:) 2571:) 2556:) 2533:) 2519:) 2496:) 2486:}} 2482:{{ 2459:, 2411:) 2350:) 2317:) 2280:) 2272:-- 2251:) 2219:) 2179:) 2164:) 2144:; 2092:) 2076:) 2060:, 2056:, 2002:) 1979:) 1960:) 1937:) 1915:) 1900:) 1885:) 1854:) 1840:) 1826:) 1812:) 1798:) 1783:) 1763:) 1747:) 1705:) 1685:, 1651:) 1635:2¢ 1632:- 1615:) 1598:2¢ 1595:- 1575:) 1558:2¢ 1555:- 1541:2¢ 1538:- 1525:) 1507:2¢ 1504:- 1445:) 1430:) 1410:) 1393:) 1389:• 1358:) 1336:) 1313:) 1298:) 1267:) 1252:) 1220:) 1190:) 1164:) 1142:) 1123:) 1107:) 1086:) 1071:) 1041:) 974:) 952:) 929:) 913:) 879:) 838:) 834:• 800:) 786:) 758:) 750:- 697:) 681:) 628:) 624:• 601:) 584:) 580:• 552:) 532:) 528:• 496:' 463:) 438:) 419:) 403:) 379:) 350:) 325:) 309:) 282:) 267:) 241:) 220:) 192:) 178:) 163:) 147:) 115:) 90:) 74:) 46:) 2595:( 2581:( 2567:( 2552:( 2529:( 2515:( 2492:( 2407:( 2346:( 2313:( 2276:( 2247:( 2215:( 2175:( 2160:( 2132:/ 2129:n 2126:ɒ 2123:k 2117:ˈ 2114:/ 2110:( 2088:( 2072:( 1998:( 1975:( 1956:( 1933:( 1911:( 1896:( 1881:( 1850:( 1836:( 1822:( 1808:( 1794:( 1779:( 1759:( 1743:( 1701:( 1647:( 1611:( 1571:( 1521:( 1480:) 1477:⭐ 1474:( 1441:( 1426:( 1406:( 1385:( 1354:( 1332:( 1309:( 1294:( 1263:( 1248:( 1216:( 1186:( 1160:( 1138:( 1119:( 1103:( 1082:( 1067:( 1037:( 1025:) 1021:( 1004:) 1000:( 970:( 948:( 940:( 925:( 909:( 875:( 830:( 796:( 782:( 754:( 735:( 693:( 677:( 620:( 597:( 576:( 548:( 524:( 459:( 434:( 415:( 399:( 375:( 346:( 321:( 305:( 278:( 263:( 237:( 216:( 188:( 174:( 159:( 143:( 111:( 86:( 70:( 42:(

Index


WWIImaster22
talk
03:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
unsigned
2.223.184.11
talk
17:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Mediatech492
talk
21:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
unsigned
2.223.184.11
talk
18:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
jhawkinson
talk
19:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Mediatech492
talk
21:35, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
jhawkinson
talk
06:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Mediatech492
talk
09:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
META:DICK
Walter Görlitz
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.