239:
666:
582:
274:. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge (XXG)’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Knowledge (XXG) administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
495:
752:
81:
says: "If you have a personal connection to a topic or person, you are advised to refrain from editing those articles directly. Requests for updates to an article about yourself or someone with whom you have a personal connection can be made on the article's talk page by following the instructions at
550:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
463:
They were inserted by me this week. I rewrote and sourced them based on the source. Those are my words you removed. And now you are adding in character assassination stuff again. Look, I came here to reach out to you. It is clear you don't have much experience with BLPs, and that is fine, but please
350:
I am going to reach out to you here, because I don't want to go running to drama boards, but I have to say I am concerned that you do not appear to be approaching pages that have a connection with
Richard Gill from a neutral point of view. We both are aware that you have history with him, and you
509:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
448:
I removed those only because I have concerns about their non-neutral wording and the fact that they were included by a COI editor. If you think there is good justification for the content being re-added, you can seek a consensus on talk. I am not trying to make any "point".
25:
MeltingDistrict. The Lucy Letby case is not closed. She can, and likely will, appeal.So the analogy with these nutty conspiracy theorists is a bit weak. If we were now at the “long after the case is closed” stage, The
Telegraph would not have published that article.
700:
314:
216:
Here’s a suggestion for you: add a sentence to the article about me saying that “Gill is currently one of a number of scientists advocating for an appeal and a retrial of Lucy Letby.” The
Telegraph article could be cited.
378:
page just because you don't want me to. You feel I am non-neutral, I don't think you are neutral. The feeling is mutual. I suggest you approach me therefore as an equal editor or don't bother at all
45:
wrote that then isn't it, because we don't get to decide to censor information on
Knowledge (XXG) if we don't like it, we just have to report what the secondary sources say, like it or not. Sorry!
413:
You know what, I will self-revert it, to prove to you that I agree with ONUS. I hope you will take this gesture and follow ONUS likewise by not re-instating your content without a consensus.
305:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics
688:
You have been sanctioned because you clearly hold a strong bias against
Richard D. Gill and are unable to edit neutrally or constructively where Gill is in any way involved.
359:
is a core policy. I know you will wish to disagree with me, but please take this in the spirit it is meant - that you could have a lot to offer, but not on these articles.
199:
You are a
Knowledge (XXG) editor with one single topic: Lucy Letby. I suggest you stick to that page. You will have a lot of work cut out for you when the appeal starts.
96:
I have alerted
Knowledge (XXG) editors to your vandalism, because indeed I should not touch the article about myself (a living person) till I’m no longer a living person.
59:
But you didn’t write what the
Telegraph said. You twisted what the Telegraph said. Seems you have an agenda. You are breaking a number of Knowledge (XXG) rules.
708:
248:
793:
351:
might like to consider taking a step back and editing other pages about which you have less strong views. Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to
684:
and BLPs that he has been mentioned in, used as a source in, or commented on. You may appeal this topic ban no sooner than one year from now.
696:
510:
78:
74:
145:
805:
731:
336:
723:
704:
526:
789:
530:
396:
and as the above contentious topics warning has been brought to your attention, I would gently suggest you self revert this
352:
785:
760:
716:
538:
82:
WP:COIREQ". I'd be very careful about reverting other editors' edits on a page about yourself, as you have been doing.
692:
801:
727:
332:
775:
771:
767:
543:
522:
506:
321:
514:
310:
644:
594:
450:
414:
379:
222:
207:
181:
167:
149:
129:
111:
101:
83:
64:
46:
31:
22:
602:
566:
469:
439:
404:
364:
617:
518:
701:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Editing of
Biographies of Living Persons#Final decision
464:
have a read of the guidance and a think about what you are doing, and why. I'll leave it there.
431:
255:
251:, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles
200:
633:
712:
673:
393:
356:
144:
I have an agenda? You ought to remain from making such assumptive comments, as you should be
621:
590:
586:
110:
I have read that comment three times and still don't understand what its supposed to mean.
681:
558:
Your reverts can be grouped but this still constitutes your third revert within 24 hours:
218:
203:
177:
163:
125:
97:
60:
27:
770:
that was created to violate
Knowledge (XXG) policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
726:. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.
715:
to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be
598:
562:
547:
517:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about
465:
435:
400:
360:
521:. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
238:
628:
applies there because the sense of the discussion has more significant consequences.
502:
375:
788:. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
665:
629:
317:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the
259:. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and
555:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
270:
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as
809:
735:
652:
637:
606:
570:
494:
473:
458:
443:
422:
408:
387:
368:
340:
226:
211:
185:
171:
157:
133:
119:
105:
91:
68:
54:
35:
298:
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
624:
but in any case, both apply to ANI and not just talk pages. In fact, it
751:
659:
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban
430:. You know there is no problem with those. I think this falls foul of
546:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
746:
643:
Well okay fine, I won't touch the previous entries I've made.
201:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/MeltingDistrict
589:
regarding Your edits relating to Richard Gill. The thread is
493:
784:, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
559:
428:
397:
537:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
148:. You are breaking a number of Knowledge (XXG) rules.
77:, you are strongly discouraged to edit in such a way.
529:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
313:or you may learn more about this contentious topic
292:
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
374:Look mate, I am not going to stop editing on the
285:, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
265:imply that there are any issues with your editing
553:even if you do not violate the three-revert rule
513:to work toward making a version that represents
691:This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an
295:follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
277:Within contentious topics, editors should edit
678:
146:commenting on content, not on the contributor
8:
392:Also as I have just drawn your attention to
722:If you wish to appeal the ban, please read
719:for an extended period to enforce the ban.
505:shows that you are currently engaged in an
245:You have recently edited a page related to
289:adhere to the purposes of Knowledge (XXG);
707:. This sanction has been recorded in the
355:. I am sure you have a lot to offer, but
680:Your are indefinitely topic banned from
427:Oh dear. Look, these are tendentious:
434:. Again, requesting you self revert.
176:Sorry, I apologise for that comment.
7:
593:. The discussion is about the topic
79:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of Interest
75:Knowledge (XXG):conflict of interest
585:There is currently a discussion at
249:living or recently deceased people
232:Introduction to contentious topics
14:
798:{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
750:
664:
580:
237:
542:—especially if you violate the
501:Your recent editing history at
311:arbitration clerks' noticeboard
301:refrain from gaming the system.
1:
810:23:24, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
705:contentious topics procedure
736:23:24, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
695:under the authority of the
653:18:27, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
638:18:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
607:13:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
571:08:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
474:19:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
459:19:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
444:19:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
423:19:08, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
409:19:04, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
388:19:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
369:19:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
341:01:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
227:00:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
212:00:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
186:01:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
172:23:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
158:23:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
134:00:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
120:00:01, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
106:23:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
92:23:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
69:23:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
55:23:39, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
36:23:37, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
828:
786:may be reverted or deleted
41:Hi, Richard. It's a shame
794:guide to appealing blocks
703:and, if applicable, the
693:uninvolved administrator
648:
454:
418:
383:
309:you may ask them at the
253:, a topic designated as
153:
115:
87:
50:
796:, then adding the text
759:This account has been
686:
498:
162:You are just a troll.
802:ScottishFinnishRadish
792:by first reading the
774:, but using them for
728:ScottishFinnishRadish
697:Arbitration Committee
497:
333:ScottishFinnishRadish
676:now applies to you:
539:blocked from editing
124:No sense of humour?
17:Conspiracy theorists
724:the appeals process
353:WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS
527:dispute resolution
499:
284:
280:
272:contentious topics
264:
815:
814:
790:appeal this block
544:three-revert rule
282:
278:
262:
819:
799:
754:
747:
709:log of sanctions
668:
584:
583:
519:how this is done
326:
320:
241:
827:
826:
822:
821:
820:
818:
817:
816:
797:
745:
740:
739:
699:'s decision at
682:Richard D. Gill
669:
661:
645:MeltingDistrict
614:
595:MeltingDistrict
591:MeltingDistrict
581:
578:
531:page protection
492:
451:MeltingDistrict
415:MeltingDistrict
380:MeltingDistrict
348:
330:
329:
324:
318:
247:articles about
242:
234:
150:MeltingDistrict
112:MeltingDistrict
84:MeltingDistrict
47:MeltingDistrict
23:MeltingDistrict
19:
12:
11:
5:
825:
823:
813:
812:
755:
744:
741:
711:. Please read
672:The following
670:
663:
662:
660:
657:
656:
655:
613:
610:
577:
574:
556:
491:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
476:
347:
344:
303:
302:
299:
296:
293:
290:
283:constructively
266:
243:
236:
235:
233:
230:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
142:
141:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
824:
811:
807:
803:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
778:
773:
769:
765:
764:
762:
756:
753:
749:
748:
743:November 2023
742:
738:
737:
733:
729:
725:
720:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
698:
694:
689:
685:
683:
677:
675:
667:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
641:
640:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
611:
609:
608:
604:
600:
597:. Thank you.
596:
592:
588:
575:
573:
572:
568:
564:
561:
560:
554:
549:
545:
541:
540:
534:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
503:Lucia de Berk
496:
489:
475:
471:
467:
462:
461:
460:
456:
452:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:
410:
406:
402:
398:
395:
391:
390:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:Lucia de Berk
373:
372:
371:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
345:
343:
342:
338:
334:
328:
323:
322:Ctopics/aware
316:
312:
308:
300:
297:
294:
291:
288:
287:
286:
275:
273:
268:
260:
258:
257:
252:
250:
240:
231:
229:
228:
224:
220:
214:
213:
209:
205:
202:
187:
183:
179:
175:
174:
173:
169:
165:
161:
160:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
135:
131:
127:
123:
122:
121:
117:
113:
109:
108:
107:
103:
99:
95:
94:
93:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
71:
70:
66:
62:
58:
57:
56:
52:
48:
44:
43:The Telegraph
40:
39:
38:
37:
33:
29:
24:
16:
781:
777:illegitimate
776:
763:indefinitely
758:
757:
721:
690:
687:
679:
671:
625:
615:
579:
557:
552:
536:
535:
500:
490:October 2023
349:
331:
306:
304:
276:
271:
269:
254:
246:
244:
219:Richard Gill
215:
204:Richard Gill
198:
178:Richard Gill
164:Richard Gill
126:Richard Gill
98:Richard Gill
61:Richard Gill
42:
28:Richard Gill
20:
599:Sirfurboy🏄
563:Sirfurboy🏄
523:noticeboard
466:Sirfurboy🏄
436:Sirfurboy🏄
401:Sirfurboy🏄
361:Sirfurboy🏄
327:template.
256:contentious
73:You have a
768:sockpuppet
626:especially
576:ANI Notice
346:Neutrality
307:procedures
674:topic ban
618:WP:REDACT
515:consensus
511:talk page
279:carefully
780:reasons
551:warring—
525:or seek
507:edit war
432:WP:POINT
800:below.
772:allowed
761:blocked
717:blocked
713:WP:TBAN
630:DeCausa
548:reverts
394:WP:ONUS
357:WP:NPOV
782:is not
622:WP:TPO
587:WP:ANI
766:as a
616:It's
261:does
21:Hi, @
806:talk
732:talk
649:talk
634:talk
620:not
603:talk
567:talk
470:talk
455:talk
440:talk
419:talk
405:talk
384:talk
365:talk
337:talk
315:here
281:and
223:talk
208:talk
182:talk
168:talk
154:talk
130:talk
116:talk
102:talk
88:talk
65:talk
51:talk
32:talk
612:ANI
533:.
263:not
808:)
734:)
651:)
636:)
605:)
569:)
472:)
457:)
442:)
421:)
407:)
399:.
386:)
367:)
339:)
325:}}
319:{{
267:.
225:)
210:)
184:)
170:)
156:)
132:)
118:)
104:)
90:)
67:)
53:)
34:)
804:(
730:(
647:(
632:(
601:(
565:(
468:(
453:(
438:(
417:(
403:(
382:(
363:(
335:(
221:(
206:(
180:(
166:(
152:(
128:(
114:(
100:(
86:(
63:(
49:(
30:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.