User talk:MervinVillarreal

2774:

in behalf of your opinion, the discussion dies, as long before it should've. Very Quickly after your block is released, over a month since the conversation died and About a month and a half since the discussion was started, you go back to the thread to try to force the discussion to reopen, and keep it open, against, again, unanimous opposition " where says in wikipedia that consensus should end if it's been a time has not published anything? "After Rightly others tell you That the conversation is over, you edit-war in an Attempt to force the issue to stay open:" Read:

2778:"Disruptive editing may result in warnings and then escalating blocks, Typically starting with 24 hours." I never received any warning from anyone I present over 10 reliable sources about the nationality of the movie, in the same website of the producer company, not is based in uk says on the website. but, whatever, I will not argue more, maybe in the future someone else arrives and open another topic about nationality "oh my god, no from Venezuela, I dont want be blocked again." how long is "indefinitely" 1, 2, 3 months? 1889:

program you run yourself or anything. They're all geolocating to the same place because they're all from teh same internet provider, but the actual computer they represent changes from time to time. That's what we're saying. It's not malicious on your end or anything, it's just how your Internet works. The practical upshot for you is: do not try to edit Knowledge while you're logged out, even if you find yourself technically able to. Even if you can, you're not supposed to while this block is active. Does that help?

222: 271: 1469:

that, when my user account was blocked, I was quite stunned, but since the dear Admin fellow who had the cheek to give me a little slap on the wrist did not specify I was not only blocked from using said prior account, I was under the impression that I could continue to edit, just not logged in. After all dear sir, why would a block mean I should in fact, toff, be blocked from editing? Guffaw dear sir, I say guffaw".

2112:"who are now aware of your intent to continue your disruptive behaviour" I never i said that it would continue with that, whatever, also, i never did, and I will not argue about it, just i say that i will continue to participate in all consensus that i can, because that's the point, to discuss, to find an answer and a point . Then, wait for 1 month,I do not forget " World War z", and Rockstar Games :') 2851: 2688: 2503: 2343: 2193: 833: 171: 2627:.) Since you were the only one in favor of your opinion, the debate dies, as it should've long before. Very quickly after your block is released, over a month since the conversation died and about a month and a half since the discussion was started, you go back to the thread to try to force the discussion to reopen, and keep it open, against, again, unanimous opposition: 717:

company to determining nationality "except the director, this has no bearing on nationality", in wikipedia, we determine the nationality of the movie, for that; who company produces the movie and who distributed, you know, you need find any source that says that GK Films has offices in London even, or else I will go to change the nationality, I have my reliable sources.

2133: 277: 2043:). As you've shown several times before and admitted now, you don't know how Knowledge works. Please spend the next month learning how it works. As mentioned below, if you keep up what you have been doing you will be blocked again! This is not in any way a threat, I'm just telling you what will happen if the disruption continues. 2611:

Okay, if you want an in-depth explanation of what was disruptive, here you go. First off, one definiton of disruptive editing (out of many): "In some cases, editors have perpetuated disputes by sticking to an allegation or viewpoint long after the consensus of the community has decided that moving on

1831:

Where did they come from? I say again, not my IP, and then, if 190.198.26.57 is my ip, I can not be using dynamic IP, then my modem is dynamic, but Yunshui says " you have the technical means to evade the block " if I were using a program to have a dinamyc ip, then it cant give the same location, the

1517:

You aren't "trying to get it right", you're maliciously ignoring facts, policies and consensus. When your block expires, if you somehow manage to become a constructive editor, then hopefully no it won't. But if you're going to edit war, avoid blocks and pretend you're doing nothing wrong, then you'll

1036:

An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions, rather than trying to resolve the disagreement by discussion. Edit warring is unconstructive and creates animosity between editors, making it harder to reach a consensus. Users who

1944:

now blocked for 29 days for something they didn't do. So, if someone edits as an IP while their account is blocked, they're potentially being a dick to dozens of other, completely innocent people, who are caught up in the blocks as collateral damage. The moral of the story: editing as an IP address

1558:

As long as you don't forget Mervin that the block is on YOU as a person/editor and not your IP address. I should point out that an IP address is assigned to only one computer at any one time (not the network) and it can be quite some time before it is reassigned to someone else, should said computer

1468:

I think that's what he is actually admitting. Let me run it through the textometer...*beep beep* "Dear sir, I was not committing vandalism, I was simply editing using these various IPs to which I have access for normal, non vandalism reasons as you can imaging, toff toff. I'm sure you can understand

2773:

Ok, first, "In the face of unanimous opposition from multiple users, you persisted in dragging out the conversation right up Until You Were blocked on January 4th, 2013", "You probably used IP addresses to continue the discussion even while blocked" no evidence of that. "Since you were the only one

1261:

Mervin, in a little while this block will be over. In the meantime, you can ponder a few questions, and the better you ponder them, the longer your career here will be. a. do you know why you're blocked? b. what is it you're trying to accomplish on Knowledge? c. do you think that what you want and

1768:

I tell you again and again, it is not dynamic MY IP, I'm saying where they find this IP: 190.198.26.57, because my ip is, 190.78.0.1. that's it, besides Yunshui says: "you're on a dynamic IP, yes, You have the technical means to evade the block" (...), "you have the technical means to evade the

716:

Look, if you find any source that says that GK Films is based in UK, or even having offices in UK, I forget all about World War Z, but if not, I will proceed to change the nationality of the film, since I have the evidence to prove that world war z film is American, and no have British producer

2643:

disruptive editing, as defined by the quote from the guideline above. Since you still don't realize that this was disruptive, and you still show no sign of being willing to abide by community consensus when it doesn't go your way, I'm afraid I'm going to have to decline this request, as well.

1888:

Okay! Well, this is a really unhelpful conversation all around. Mervin, your IP address is something that your internet provider assigns to you. Sometimes, they don't always assign you the same address each time you connect to the Internet. That's called a dynamic IP address, and it's not a

690:

As has already been explained to you....GK is in fact a British Producer. You can cite as many sources as you want saying it's offices are in California, but don't forget, that it is common practice for film production companies to have offices in Los Angeles...you know...where Hollywood is?

2083:

is the OUTCOME not the process of a discussion. Secondly, you will find yourself blocked/reverted/rolled back at every opportunity from a cadre of editors who are now aware of your intent to continue your disruptive behaviour. You are best off taking the block on the chin and coming back

2588:

But the problem here is that I never did that, never delete an entire article, or delete information harmful to a user or insults, none of that, I dont have that be blocked for that reason, I Never did "disruptive editing", but of course , you would expect of an Administrator review.

1037:

engage in edit wars risk being blocked or even banned. Note that an editor who repeatedly restores his or her preferred version is edit warring, whether or not his or her edits were justifiable: it is no defence to say "but my edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring".

1501:

and a little thing, maybe a lot of you will say, "He who wants to do is just vandalism on wikipedia and doing just patriotism," Answer: No, just trying to get it right and doing this 100% true. but for do those things, how is my end? blocked for one month "Applause"

938:

You are blocked for disruptive behaviour, incivility and edit warring (note: not 3RR violations - whilst 3RR is a bright line rule, you can edit war without breaking it, which you did). Since you have not addressed any of these issues, I am declining this unblock

651:

Then I respectfully suggest that you leave it for English speaking Wikipedians or those Wikipedians with a firm enough grasp of the English Language. Perhaps you would be better suited to Spanish Knowledge. The article is not false as it currently stands.

813:

Hi. I've blocked you for one week, due to much the same behavior that got you blocked the last time. You apparently show no interest in discussing with other editors, but instead go around reverting on multiple articles again and again. Also, replies like

779:

Hello sir, I am the user from India. Most of the users are vandalizing the wiki article.I dnt know how to avoid their disruptive editing.I need ur help lot to overcome this sir..I am auto confirmed user nw and wat else shud I do to warn them?? Please help

3044:

you can demonstrate that your attitude to editing has changed and you're willing to actually read and understand what other editors say to you, then that would show you've changed. You don't need to be unblocked to demonstrate a change in your attitude.

918:

First, when I returned to do vandalism? I not revert an article 3 times in less than 24 hours to be considered vandalism? Or am I wrong? second, he insult me, please read; "I Would Have just templated your ass" Where is my vandalism? Tests will I show?

1486:

LOL, how you know it? may be can be other person, or no? I repeat you, if my account is blocked, but not my ip, and another person edits on wikipedia, and maybe it can doing what im doing, <Did you read well? Will my account need be blocked again?

987:

Just a small comment; you don't have to violate 3RR to have an edit war. You've had around 20 edits for the past few days where you either add "american" or remove other nationalities, or revert other users opposing you. 3RR is just one part of the

2010:

GRAPPLE, own disruptive editing? oh, sound good, definitely i do not understand the rules of Knowledge, are so confusing and weird, that simply do not make sense, but anyway, one month is nothing, I'll wait to keep doing what I do .. GOOD THINGS.

2450:

Disruptive editing is a broad category. Edit-warring is just one kind of disruptive editing. As previously stated in the last decline, the ANI thread on your behavior, to which you ultimately declined to respond, despite being urged to do so, has

1905:

I know that, so, was me, who misread? what he said Yunshu? I think it was that, whatever, so if I can not edit being "logged out" then why the blockade lasts a month in my account, and 2 weeks in the IP?, why not have the same blocked time?

3078:

I do not want to happen to me again in the future, I think my ignorance caused me that I've been blocked 2 times this year, sometimes I think that what I say is right, but as I said, I'll take the time to learn more from wikipedia .

1025:|The last time I was blocked, blocked me because I reversed an article three times in less than 24 hours, I have the evidence, so then why I was blocked? .... Also, add a national "American" than once every 24 hours is vandalism?}} 2459:

to Knowledge's policies and guidelines, as well as the opinions of other editors. I also suggest you think very carefully if you wish to make another unblock request as repeated meritless unblock requests is considered abusive.

1584:

what I still do not understand is that why im blocked a month by using my IP address to edit? supposed that my account is still locked, but no the IP. MistherShaney can you explain?, of course, if u know answer. Thanks dude.

1096:|exactly! the last time that I was blocked was for edit warring, and I accept it, I did ,but since that i was unblocked, I not do more a edit warring, so I say What are my edit wars that I did today? 04/01/2013? Thank u}} 1604:. Since you're on a dynamic IP, yes, you have the technical means to evade the block; each time you do so your edits will be reverted and your chances of ever being allowed to edit again will be reduced. Just because you 3039:

It's not about your editing habits per se, but also your attitude. If you refrain from abusing your talk page access like you have with unblock requests, you can still use this page to communicate with other editors—and

926:

exactly! the last time that I was blocked was for edit warring, and I accept it, I did ,but since that i was unblocked, I not do more a edit warring, so I say What are my edit wars that I did today? 04/01/2013? Thank

922:

The last time I was blocked, blocked me because I reversed an article three times in less than 24 hours, I have the evidence, so then why I was blocked? .... Also, add a national "American" than once every 24 hours is

2026:

Which is why you should read up on policy. Keep in mind that you are the one who has violated several policies, and unless you actually take the time to read up on and understand the basic principles behind Knowledge

3004:

You can discuss your block with editors responding here through regaular threading and indenting; using the unblock request template repeatedly and unnecessarily will likely reult in your talk page access being

1984:

will be blocked further. But your IP will be blocked too, meaning others will lose out. You can't blame others for your own disruptive editing, but you have caused the potential for others to be disadvantaged.

1939:

Because your IP address isn't always yours, it can be assigned to someone else. So, if we block your IP address for a month, and your IP address gets reassigned to someone else tomorrow (which does happen),

496:

If you insist on editing English Knowledge then I must insist that your use of the written English Language improves! It is the same. Right down to the shade of Orange surrounding your username at the top.

612:

A consensus has not been reached. Mainly because one of the editors cant even write in English properly to be able to, in my personal opinion, not only put across his argument but to make suitable edits.

1388:

Am I doing vandalism? So much time for that? IP these had blocked me, but the admin never said me that could not continue to use these accounts with those IP, since I'm blocked in my account, not IP.

1360: 2804:

mentality above, that might lean towards "infinite". You show ZERO understanding the what led to your block, and by wrongly quoting policy you're hoping to Wikilawyer your way out of a block (

1961:

then, every day I have a new IP? ..OK, if a person edit on wikipedia with the IP that i had "which does happen..." I go to be blocked again for another month? THAT GOOD, now i understand all.

1738:, the fact that you have clearly admitted that both of those IPs are you demonstrates that. Having a dynamic IP means blocking your IP on this site is not possible but it doesn't mean that 1711:

This for you Yunshui; SO, both say they are from Venezuela, the both IP's, how could have a dynamic IP address when is the same site, and the same country, and the same state?,

415:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 2428:

WHERE? I never did disruptive editing, edit war is very different, and no I did not..and if I had doing edit war, I cant be blocked indefinitely, I'd say that would be long.

282: 1600:

As Mr Shiney explained above, the fact that you can edit through an IP is immaterial. YOU, the real-life human being sat at a computer, are prohibited from editing, not

1429:

Where is the proof? so, if someone other than me, use my computer to edit on Knowledge, also my account go to be blocked? administrator blocked my account, not my IP.

2891: 2728: 2543: 2383: 2233: 1111:

Please do not post more than one unblock request at a time. I have untemplated the two extraneous ones above and copied their content to your original request.

873: 112: 398: 2996:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2842:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2679:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2494:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2334:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

979:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

397: 147: 1277:

I do the best I can. but I think wikipedia is not the most reliable website to find information about things, but that yes.. is the most famous.

727: 343: 2936:

I do not understand, how they will know that I've changed, if I'm blocked, in three month maybe none remember me, and I will be forever blocked

3025:

I do not understand, how they will know that I've changed, if I'm blocked, in three month maybe none remember me, and I will be forever blocked

2886: 2723: 2538: 2378: 2228: 868: 286: 75: 153: 2620:. In the face of unanimous opposition from multiple users, you persisted in dragging out the conversation right up until you were blocked 1444:

Someone else with the exact same editing practices and writing style just happened to use your computer? Just admit you were caught out.

2981: 2827: 2664: 2479: 2319: 2168: 1327: 1203: 1171: 964: 1199: 637:

My English is not perfect, but I try to improve, and I do not want that Knowledge articles are false. "World war Z Film" for example.

1629:

Dynamic IP?? of course not, I dont have programs for that, and my modem is not dynamic, my ip is one that is and will be: 190.78.0.1

2651: 1952: 1896: 1345:

hello,Why my blocked for 1 week, and now up to a month? I had blocked for 1 week, now im blocked until February 7, why that raise?

2085: 346:

using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

818:

doesn't really help your situation. I've set the block for one week for now, use that time to cool down and read up on policy.

1143:

and his contribs. Sock hadn't done anything really disruptive, but as the user is blocked, there is no need for an open sock.

676:

clear that it is false, the movie has no British producer, and leads to "UK" in the section of country. you can explain me it?

2905: 2813: 2742: 2557: 2397: 2247: 887: 98: 2630:. After others rightly tell you that the conversation is over, you edit-war in an attempt to force the issue to stay open: 2181: 1658: 1618: 1121: 949: 332: 238: 142: 1559:

change it's IP address. In other words, don't even try and kid us. We are all nerds with far too much time on our hands.

2148: 322: 598:

so what is a consensus? do not British production in the movie, then this cant to have a "UK" in the section of country

2152: 1742:

cannot be blocked—using a dynamic IP to edit through a block is not permissible and will just see the block extended.

133: 457:

Random question, why have you set out your talk page exactly like mine? Right down to the colours in the title part?

2863: