126:
around in a hearse (called the
Bauhausmobile), and singing in a droning fashion with introverted lyrics ("Hollow Hills", "In The Flat Field", "Dark Entites", etc); making them the first Goth band as they invented the style and the sound. Many Goths like Peter Murphy came to laugh at themselves for how silly we look, but we still remained who we are and enjoyed that style and sound. Can you even define what a "post-punk" band style sounds like? Bauhaus wasn't exploring anything (name one song of theirs that's a "Folk Song" to you and I can easily contradict that), they were designing the music that came to be known as Goth, in where various people decided to derive Bauhaus' style and appearances into their personal lives which started the Gothic subculture. It doesn't make music and chronological sense when you completely ignore the reference I use (Rolling Stone magazine, reference #29) and use this "quite down in the article" that you don't even reference the number of which one you use to push your false opinion (I assume it's "Alltalk" which as I said to you MANY TIMES, that Alltalk was not in existence when Bauhaus was). If insulting you is the only way to get your attention, then I welcome it instead you just mindlessly reverting the page to what you pretend what a band's genre is that an entire Gothic subculture was formed from. Besides, I have met many like you, pretending you know things you don't while congregating in places like The Cake Shop (where good people like Henry Rollins took the piss out of people like you there, there's a Youtube video showing that); doing things like smelling bad while standing in the middle of a Goth club in the middle of the dance floor standing a circle with your friends, critiquing the club and the patrons to each other instead of dancing or getting out of the way of the Goths who came there to enjoy the music and not be "more alternative than thou" pretentious douchebags sucking down another Pabst Blue Ribbon beer. I may not know what you look like, but I have a good feeling if your male you're probably sitting there in plaid flannel shirt, skinny jeans, Chuck Taylor shoes, sporting a woodsman beard, and several tattoos on your arms which "mean something" but in actuality are contradictory tattoos that look like white noise when all grouped together; if female you probably have Betty Page bangs and use the word "Rockabilly" to describe yourself alot along with the white noise tattoos. I despise people like you because you redefine everything to make it more "alternative", as if it has to be. If you're going to call bands like Bauhaus "post-punk" (because you have the wrong idea that they were exploring genres, despite their first song being still considered the Goth anthem with how it was played and sung), then why not everything after punk be called "post-punk"? Why don't we call grunge, hip-hop, industrial, edm, electronica, new wave, and others all "post-punk"? If Bauhaus is "post-punk" and not Goth as you claim, why doesn't their first song sound like Joy Division or other bands created before Bauhaus that's apparently described as "post-punk"? Why does their first song have a style all of it's own and why do other songs in their discography match their first song in either style or lyrics? But I am sure your answer to all this will be "fuck this guy" because no matter polite or rude as fuck, you'll still easily click your mouse to revert whatever I change it too on Knowledge (XXG) despite not being able to change Rolling Stone magazine's assessment of Bauhaus from first hand knowledge (as well as the entire Goth subculture's knowledge of Bauhaus).
227:
claiming
Bauhaus was one of the bands that started Goth, yet also apparently wasn't really a Goth band because the scene wasn't around yet? No band (except for a Hipster band it seems) that does their own style and pretty much invents a new genre of music names it outright themselves. You didn't hear the Ramones or The Sex Pistols going on stage and saying "This is called Punk music and I hope you as the audience likes it.", they played their music people liked it and a scene formed around it that eventually got a name, but the bands that started it are still called Punk bands primarily, not "post-garage band" or "post-disco" or something silly like that despite being some of the progenitors to the scene. I again ask to see your references but I think you know your references are bunk and keep referring to the easily edited/reverted Knowledge (XXG) article as your "proof". It's only personal in that you and people like you take something long established like the Goth scene and try to redefine it for either no reason or for some of you Hipsters, try to claim something in the past as your own "original idea" or something you "discovered" and then try to make money off of upping the price from what it was in the past (like Vinyl records). I hope your kind dies out one day after people discover they don't have to be "More alternative than thou" pretentious douchebag Hipsters, but can go back to enjoying things for the sake of enjoying it and not trying to make a quick buck off of some "quirky" thing they are selling for more than it's actually worth.
441:"Lunging at Tintin, the flash bulb"! And I actually typed this before I read to the end of your above reply where you spell out this phrase also, so that shows how much I'm tracking with you. So let's fix it! "The latter"? No way, that's awful. And I looked briefly at the previous sentence in the paragraph that you directed me to, but I don't think we should tinker with it; I think we should fix this problem in a focused way, ensuring we are not accidentally breaking anything else. I think I remember that this currently bad sentence was changed late in the grueling process, after other editors approved the text. I remember it always said, "Tintin sets off the flash bulb of his camera, scaring the Yeti into fleeing." (I think we got into a late discussion about who set it off.) Let me know if you think we should revert to that, as it reads quite well. I just now came up with other two simple fixes, one of which attributes the flash bulb to the Yeti, as you wanted. "Lunging at Tintin, the yeti accidentally sets off the flash bulb of Tintin's camera, scaring it into fleeing." Or: "It lunges at Tintin as the flash bulb of Tintin's camera is accidentally set off, scaring the yeti into fleeing." (I think I like that last one.) What do you think?
180:
meant that you typed it) and if it doesn't refer to a cited source (doesn't your extensive bullshit that you spout about
Knowledge (XXG) include "no original research"?) then it's useless. Tell me what the cited source is and I'll consider it, I may reject the source as unreliable but at least you'll give me SOMETHING to look at outside of an easily modified Knowledge (XXG) article. You never look at the Talk page of Bauhaus (otherwise you would see that I do have consensus), you're just a Hipster with a very wrong opinion about something and don't want to admit that you're wrong. You know there are Hipster bands out there with incomprehensible music out there that you could troll the pages of to make sure they're known as "more alternative than thou", instead of changing the genres of very well known and established bands simply because Knowledge (XXG) allows you to.
357:
important to clarify this. Apparently you also believe it is the Yeti's camera. It is Tintin's camera, so we should definitely not say "the Yeti accidentally sets off the flash bulb of his camera". As for which one of them set it off after the Yeti lunges, we truly don't know which one of them it was. We see that they Yeti lunges and we see the flash bulb is set off. It is more likely that Tintin pushed the button actually, but rather than pin it on either of them as if we know this, I found a way to say it without getting into something as unimportant as who set it off. Ending the sentence with the word "scared" seems amateurish to me. It's an amateurish-sounding word and it seems to end the sentence with a thud. Let's not leave that word languishing in the reader's mind while they get to the next sentence.
106:
of your emo phase" trust fund child and start looking at references that existed when the band was together (unlike
Alltalk which gets second hand information and gets it wrong). You claim to "use the talk page" to get consensus, but you never contribute to it's discussion, you don't actually go by the talk page yourself and just revert willynilly, and the talk page on Bauhaus has no one there arguing to change that band's genre from Goth to 'post-punk' (but as I said, you ignore that and just revert, revert, revert). Post-punk can be a secondary genre as listed, but if you claim that Bauhaus has more than one genre (like folk rock, which I think is silly to say) than list them all and don't stick to just "post-punk".
270:... in the entry about Harry Potter (Character). Please explain. The extant entry says Cho Chang betrays the DA in the film, whereas (a) she was under the influence of a truth drug, and (b) she fought in the end battle in the Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. So, (a) she did not betray the DA, it was forced out of her, and (b) a traitor would be nowhere to be seen in the final battle, and Cho Chang was. Then add (c) It was around 100 characters added to a lengthy article, and did not alter the shape or style, so I disagree about it being too much detail, and finally (d)the statement I altered was simply incorrect, so whether it was short or long is irrelevant.
345:
reason I believe the simpler version is an improvement is because we don't need to go into unnecessary detail. A synopsis is mostly there to help readers who haven't read the story make sense out of the rest of the article, which goes on to discuss what lead to the story's creation. We're not there to tell the whole story. It feels clunky to read that clarifying statement. It just takes too long to communicate such a small payoff. Think about how much of this kind of detail we have left out of the synopsis already. I briefly considered keeping the a cut down version of this clarification before realizing it really isn't critical; we need to get on with the story.
2314:
1208:
Laughs
Festival in Montreal. It is a fact that his tickets sold out quickly with little publicity. It is a fact that the B'nai B'rith intervened to ensure he would not be able to attend the festival. Further, please explain how Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Liberation, Nouvel Obs are dubious sources for you to delete. Of course, judging from the Osgoode Hall Law School page it is clear that no one hear actually adheres to any rules and that admins just delete things based on their personal issues. Am I to assume you are the same or is there a valid reason for the revert?
791:
since they're the ones that find out everything about their favourite celebrities. I was in a discussion with some Alan
Rickman fans in a Facebook group a few days ago and asked them if they knew about his funeral since I couldn't find any information online. They replied to me and one of them sent a picture of the invite to his funeral, which took place at the West London Crematorium in Kensal Green Cemetery. I used the information from the invite to back up my evidence. At least three fans told me that
1760:
1449:
22:
415:—that the flash bulb lunges at Tintin! The construction is plain wrong. By contrast the mistake you perceived in my sentence is imaginary. "His" can, grammatically, refer to either the Yeti or Tintin and it is logically obvious which it is. If you are really worried that someone will think the Yeti carries a camera, then let's shift things around, as the previous sentence is wonky anyhow. How about "The Yeti, revealed as a large
1404:
1001:
reason
Americans always write the country after a place-name, thinking that that will disambiguate it, as for example Boston, England. This is of course useless, as there is a Boston in Lincolnshire and another in Yorkshire. Switzerland is not a state of the Union: if you wish to clarify where it is located, it helps to specify the canton, not the confederation (CH), which in any case has already been mentioned.
2685:
2597:
2509:
2365:
2226:
2032:
1623:
1309:
349:
about these tracks. While an added word comes with a cost, and I certainly applaud any editor who can trim a word and still allow the sentence to keep the same meaning, the added cost is only one word and I think the cost is worth it to help the reader with the big reveal that is coming. When I added this same word to the article lead it was to deliberately reflect its position here.
1434:
2110:
1177:
111:
primary genre in the infobox - it makes both musical and chronological sense. All this is explained in the article; you should read it as it's quite interesting. (It's in the "musical style" section quite down in the article, so you'll need to use the arrow keys on your keyboard to reach it.) All the best getting on in life hurling hilariously random insults at people.
1247:(you also removed a similar contibution by user Ronelsax). The reason you state is that it is impossible for a 1998 episode to make a reference to a 2016 event. It is of course the other way around: in a 2016 event, Elon Musk made a cultural reference during his talk to this specific South Park episode (as confirmed by the New York Times source I added).
1478:, the date of the shooting was mentioned at the start of the lead section, but not in the main text. The lead is supposed to be a summary of the main text and is not meant to contain any information not included elsewhere. So please leave my addition to the main text or rewrite that bit if you choose, leaving the date I have added in place. Thank you.
1782:
Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail. Mind! I don’t mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the
1207:
Um...excuse me but your revert was obviously NOT justified. It is a fact that his gas chamber joke about the journalist was in response to said journalist calling him a sick brain. It is a fact that several black as well as other public figures support him. It is a fact he was invited to the Just For
798:
P.S. I created the "People who were cremated" category after noticing Simple
English Knowledge (XXG) had it, but not the main Knowledge (XXG). I thought this category could be helpful since not all people are buried when they die (the "all people are buried after they die" stereotype is one I want to
795:(Alan's widow) retained the ashes after his cremation, so I regarded it as truth. I only wanted the information of his funeral because I thought it would add to the article. I am deeply sorry for any trouble or rule-breaking I may have caused and I promise to pick more reliable sources in the future.
399:
It seems to me that "mysterious Yeti tracks" is an oxymoron: if the tracks are identified, then they are not mysterious. In fact, peeping at the book I see that they have a dispute at this point over whose tracks they are. How about something like "The porters abandon the group in fear when unusual
352:
Replacing "arriving" with "They arrive" — This one is fairly straightforward. The new edit redundantly repeats the beginning of the sentence word "They" twice in two sentences. We always want to avoid redundancy like that. Breaking the sentence into two isn't particularly necessary either. Yes, it is
226:
in the talk page claiming it's a Post Punk band, nor a reference from a separate website, book, or other researched and published source claiming as such. You are the only one claiming that
Bauhaus is a Post-Punk band primarily and not a Goth Rock band primarily. Do you even know how stupid you sound
105:
Stop reverting the genres of well known Goth bands like
Bauhaus just because you don't like looking at the facts. I did a reference cite of Rolling Stone magazine to prove to you it's a Goth band and yet you keep changing it back, even when I used my cite in the page. Stop acting like a "just got out
1927:
Your change to my Wiki page is perfectly understandable, but for the following reason I wonder if you would undo your edit earlier this month. My surname is a hyphen name Gordon Banks, hence Phillip ross was right to edit "also known as Matthew Banks". Gordon is not a Christian name. It IS confusing
916:
To clarify, are you trying to say that "alternate timeline" in general is a more comprehensible way of explaining the type of stories set on a similar-but-with-different-outcomes Earth to non-fans than "parallel universe"? Because if so, would that possibly mean that references to the world in "Rise
790:
I apologise with utmost sincerity for my accidental vandalism of Alan Rickman's page. It was definitely not my intention to vandalise the page - I merely wanted to add to it. I knew that the source I picked was unreliable, but there was no information of his funeral online, so I had to ask some fans
662:
Yes you are. Obviously you are! I don't think you understand the terminology here: I am not calling the piece of music a theory - what would that even mean? However it is a fringe theory that Rouget de Lisle took the melody from this work. It is not generally accepted by historians. Perhaps one
448:
When you said, "'mysterious Yeti tracks' is an oxymoron", you convinced me. It's simply unarguable statement. I looked at your suggestion and I think I found an even simpler fix. What do you think: "The porters abandon the group in fear when mysterious tracks are found". Or possibly "animal tracks".
201:
I am not sure you understand what "consensus" means. As the article details Bauhaus were a post-punk band experimenting with a number of styles. They are one of the progenitors of goth rock but came before it really existed. As such it makes more sense to describe them in the lede as post-punk and
125:
Bullshit. Bauhaus was a Goth band. Their style was tounge-in-cheek as with their first song Bella Lugosi's Dead, not intentionally outrageous that Glam bands/singers like David Bowie, Alice Cooper, or Kiss were. They created the style of the Goth scene by dressing in black outfits and capes, driving
1029:
Hello I see you warned an user called Calcoform about his edits to this page for not being neutral. Please can you keep an eye on this page because he has inserted the same material from weak self-published sources back in, and his general comments on the talk page and summaries are problematic and
444:
For your first point, it is an explanation, but not a necessary one. I want to agree with you and include it, believe me. I just have a stronger urge to keep the synopsis as tight as possible. It's fine, no one will be utterly confused while reading it; they will get the idea. I think the most that
2139:
Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always.
647:
I'm not promoting anything. I don't care about Rimonda, or Viotti, or deLisle. I've just studied that subject and I'd like to contribute, but I find the voice blocked by few "french-centric" editors that prevent any contribution, continuously delete sources applying wild roll-backing. The Viotti's
361:
Thanks for sitting through that. While I am not absolutely adamant about keeping the text of the article the way it was, I can certainly tell you that I have been over and over this article with a fine-toothed comb, and dozens of highly-respected Knowledge (XXG) editors have also, copy editing the
348:
Deleting the word "mysterious" before the words "Yeti tracks" — I originally added this word because it succinctly sets the stage for an unusual new character's introduction. These are no ordinary animal tracks. I felt that, if it were possible to do so, we need to know that there is something odd
285:
It is completely unnecessary and off-topic in the article about the character of Harry as it is not directly relevant to him. The fact that the article is lengthy to start with is exactly the problem. You add a few irrelevant words, another user adds a few more etc... and we end up retelling the
980:
I would like to invite you to contribute to a discussion on whether or not "The Girl Who Died" and "The Woman Who Lived" and "Heaven Sent" and "Hell Bent" are two-parters. Over the course of 3 weeks and 2 discussions, few editors have contributed, so it would be a great help if you could take the
949:
in its entirety is part of the saga. He has children in the series. The epilogue is part of the series. Just because the quantity isn't up to your standards doesn't exactly mean it's fair to say he doesn't have any. I don't know how else to describe it. I appreciate you finally taking the time to
944:
How is it inappropriate? You're engaging in an edit-war without subsequently giving any real reasoning as to why. Like I said, your link says nothing about Harry/Ron being brothers-in-law so if you wanted to say what you just said right now, you could have said it earlier and saved both of us the
456:
afraid of freezing as they arrive within sight of the monastery. I don't see a problem. By the way, until quite recently it used to end with, "before collapsing from exhaustion" until someone recently changed that to "before being caught in an avalanche." Both work equally well, but of course the
440:
I'll start with the last point first: You clearly feel strongly about it. In that case, before I had read any more of your explanation, I already felt that any strong feelings means I really must agree that we should change it. Especially since I now see what you mean about the dangling modifier:
344:
Replacing "Concerned," with "After learning that the young man was indeed on the plane," — I can of course see why you thought this was an improvement, as it clarifies that Tintin didn't rush off half-cocked, but instead had proof that his friend Chang was on the flight that crashed. However, the
143:
Well if you do come to any Goth club I attend or any other club (even a disco, if they still exist somewhere), just make sure you shower and use soap and deodorant. As for the band Bauhaus, I have consensus already on the talk page and I am using proper references, don't revert it anymore without
1904:
I don't understand it. You said my edits were wrong for Knowledge (XXG). Based on what you said, I eliminated the "Proposed Projects" from Marvel Cinematic Universe, DC Extended Universe, Universal monsters, and X-Men film series. But those sections are accepted. And mine, no. As I said, I don't
179:
You should change that to "No, I don't" unless you specifically want to point out which reference you are using for your opinions. And don't say "in the article" because if you specifically mean "in the Knowledge (XXG) article about Bauhaus" that just means that someone typed it (could have even
1000:
We have a problem with addresses because of the structure of the U.S., where the same names have been used many times, as with Springfield, Massachusetts and Springfield, Illinois. Each state however makes sure that there is not more than one of a particular name within its boundaries. For this
110:
Hi there. Actually Bauhaus were a post-punk band exploring various styles and things (rock'n'roll, glam rock, dub etc...) They weren't a goth band because the genre did not exist then, though they helped bring it into existence. That is why they are described as a post-punk band and it's the
2452:
Time has its way of putting things in their place and Charlie Hebdo (and the readerbase it represents) is neither left-wing, nor honestly "satirical", let alone equally measured in its excoriation of different religions. You don't have to take my word for it, the contents of the article in its
356:
Replacing "the flash bulb of Tintin's camera is accidentally set off, scaring the Yeti into fleeing" with "the Yeti accidentally sets off the flash bulb of his camera, and runs away scared" — Evidently you believe that the Yeti is the one who pushed the button on the camera, and you feel it is
1134:
When the subject is language, there is no absolute truth separate from usage. "Canon" for instance is originally a religous term but it has been used long enough in a literary sense that there is now an article on this topic. This article is on the phenomenon and its perception rather than a
613:
I am not inventing anything: I'm just citing sources. You are rolling back and deleting sources, so you should be blocked, not me. Knowledge (XXG) is open to everybody want to contribute citing sources. Consensus is not the voice of deLisle's friends alliance. Please stop deleting sources.
759:
Hi. You reverted my edition without any reason. I have put a picture in and made a language link to the German article, why is that a problem??! There is no independent article about Morgoth in the German Knowledge (XXG), so I had to link to a paragraph below. This is a common habit on the
2332:
This hot Tom and Jerry is an old-time drink that is once used by one and all in this country to celebrate Christmas with, and in fact it is once so popular that many people think Christmas is invented only to furnish an excuse for hot Tom and Jerry, although of course this is by no means
1635:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
2044:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1730:
I don't think any of them are sequels actually. They are all adaptations of existing books, which is quite different from making a film after a book and then making up more stories for further films, isn't it? I suppose it depends how you define a sequel. To be honest, I
1928:
and your hunch was reasonable but in all records from Who's Who to my Nat Ins details I am listed under the Letter G for Gordon Banks/Matthew. I do have problems with for example airport security/ticketing but given this I hope you will undo your minor edit. Best wishes.
1878:
is the one I could find easily. There were several articles in the trade press (I remember Locus Mag showing a picture of him with a U.S. Flag tie), at the time of his naturalization ceremony. Once I dig one of those up, I'll put that in as a reference. Regards,
67:
Hi. I meant to say "subjective" view. Doesn't really matter to me if it stays, but in the current structure it reads as a commentary on McDiarmid's performance, rather than as an adjective describing the character, which is what I think the intent is. Take care.
1152:
Okay, but the thing is just, canon and continuity are not the same concept, and I think it is important to clarify that. By no means do I want to offend anybody with that, hell no. It should just be noted that canon doesn't equal continuity and vise versa.
1321:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
696:
You did repeatedly add that Viotti is the author, which means that Rouget de Lisle took it from him since he used it in this song. For all I know it is possible but this is not generally recognised by historians, so your "probably" is misleading.
877:
Was it your edit? You shouldn't put a different link on each word, e.g. first name then last name of a person, and there is no need to link to names that are already linked to earlier in the article, as with Peter Jackson. The basics are here:
419:, suddenly appears and lunges angrily at Tintin, but flees when the latter's camera flash bulb accidentally goes off" ? Otherwise please make another suggestion, but "Lunging at Tintin, the flash bulb..." simply has to go...
2337:
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well M.
677:
You are going too far! I didn't add in the article that deLisle took the melody from Viotti's musical work, but I just add that the author of the music is highly debated and is existing one musical work of Viotti that
2730:
2642:
2552:
2408:
2269:
2072:
1663:
1349:
362:
hell out of this article on its journey through GA and then FA. They must have felt that it was in good condition. If you could, please see if you agree with the points I make above. Thanks for understanding. Best,
340:(which I took to FA) to the state before your edit for the reasons below, which summarize to: I'm sorry, but I didn't think your edit was an improvement. I mean no disrespect. Can you bear with me while I explain?
1072:
I am just going by the definition provided by various dictionaries online, and I'm not the only one who does that. I just noticed that a lot of people use the term 'canon' wrongly; I was just trying to clarify.
410:
Sorry but this one is where I really cannot agree: your phrase is a grammatical mess and I am not impressed by the dozens of highly-respected editors who let it through. Your version tells us —via the medium of
841:
rules. What you wrote is probably true, but only things that can be verified go into articles. (I am also not sure it is anyone's business where the late Mr Rickman's ashes are to be honest.) All the best.
1516:
522:
2714:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2626:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2536:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2392:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2253:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2056:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1647:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1333:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1929:
629:
I have not accused you of inventing anything. I am asking you - and so are three other editors - to stop promoting a fringe theory as if it were an accepted historical truth. Knowledge (XXG)
2699:
2611:
2522:
2453:
current form validate what I'm saying. Denying the evidence by reverting edits and wrongfully labelling them as "POV-pushing" seems akin to trying to cover a hole in a dam with a band-aid.
2378:
2239:
648:"Tema e Variazioni La Marsigliese", is not a fringe theory, but an existing musical work. I've sourced it enough, I hope. So, I urge you to be more collaborative and constructive. Thanks.--
314:
BUT - the reference to Chang betraying the DA is wrong, and not in the books anyway, so I have deleted that. Now that is a reduction to the article so you should be dancing in the streets.
897:
Yeah thanks for the advice i just want to add to these sort of pages with information from director commentary and the appendices. Although it has been completly removed now, Many thanks.
633:
open to everybody that wants to contribute, but citing sources, while necessary, is not the only requirement. So are a collaborative attitude and an adherence to neutral point of view.
945:
trouble and we could work together to keeping the article in good shape. On a sidetone, what I don't get is how you can say Ron has no children throughout the saga, and then say they .
1417:
At this wonderful time of year, I would like to give season’s greetings to all the fellow Wikipedians I have interacted with in the past! May you have a wonderful holiday season!
799:
break). Unfortunately, I have no experience in HTML editing, so I had to create the category by adding it onto his page (and the pages of a few other famous cremated people e.g.
218:
Well you certainly have no idea of what "consensus" is, nor what the idea of "reference" is. The article says what the article says because someone typed it in, as I said before
2468:
You are right that I do not need to take your word for it, having read hundreds of issues of Charlie Hebdo over 30 years, while you clearly are completely unfamiliar with it.
2140:
She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?"
1783:
simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the Country’s done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that Marley was as dead as a door-nail.
1735:
avoid looking much at categories as I suspect readers pay them no attention and there are too many mad debates to be had, so if you think I screwed this up I won't insist.
1517:
https://www.google.com/search?q=Mickey%27s+Signature&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiMq9DE_KzTAhVs5oMKHaTLBWkQsAQIKw&biw=1366&bih=662
1933:
2143:
My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019.
407:
I broke the next sentence to avoid a possible confusion: your sentence can be understood as "they are scared of freezing as they arrive". I also don't insist on it.
917:
of the Cybermen" and "The Age of Steel" and where Rose is stranded for a time from "Doomsday" also be called this or at least have the phrasing further up on e.g.
476:
I just made some changes to the article per above. Thanks again for this discussion; I believe I now possess a higher awareness of the dangling modifier! Best,
1513:
Hello Mezigue can you please Help me add Mickey's Signature Under Information you know like how all the People Signature's are here is a link to some of them
2191:
1590:
1280:
such as the depiction section and I've nominated it for peer review, can you give me any thoughts on how to improve the article on the talk page? Thanks,
803:). That itself was not an intended act of vandalism, just a shining example of a lack of HTML knowledge. I apologise for unintended vandalism yet again.
1095:
It is editorialising to say that people often use the term wrongly. Bear in mind that Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia rather than a dictionary.
396:
I think you understood my point well, and I also strive to make summaries succint but felt this was a necessary explanation. I don't insist on it.
498:
Hi, Mezigue. You may want to know that a discussion takes place in the talk page of the Malaysian MH370 main article regarding the "However" that
202:
to put that genre first in the infobox. The fact that this somehow exacerbates your personal frustrations and grudges is neither here nor there.
85:
Hello. Well I have explained my reasoning on the talk page there. To be honest it hadn't occured to me the phrase could be misread that way.
2187:
2165:
1586:
1289:
1193:
2177:
2753:
2665:
2575:
2430:
2291:
2086:
1677:
1455:
1448:
1363:
1906:
1154:
1117:
1080:
1037:
1008:
771:
730:
716:
683:
649:
615:
234:
187:
151:
1462:
555:
336:
Hi Mezigue, good to be chatting with you again. I put back the synopsis (perhaps that is the only section you read?) into the article
1536:
837:
Woah woah woah, no one said anything about vandalism! I am sure you acted in good faith; it's just that Knowledge (XXG) has strict
2136:
and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that
2313:
1580:
144:
creating a discussion on the talk page and see if you can gain consensus that Bauhaus is a different genre than what they are.
2749:
2661:
2571:
2482:
Well good for you! Perhaps certainty is the province of happiness; be sure to stay there for as long as you can, little fella.
2426:
2287:
2082:
1673:
1359:
825:
388:
2723:
2635:
2545:
2401:
2262:
2065:
1656:
1583:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
1342:
2173:
1945:
2128:
1707:
All the other film articles contain the cats ] and ] - I can't see any reason why Part 2 shouldn't contain them as well?
663:
day it will be, and Knowledge (XXG) will reflect this then. For now, you are pushing a fringe theory and edit-warring.
1950:
First of all, no one "owns" any page here on Knowledge (XXG) and second if you are the subject on that page you have a
2735:
2647:
2557:
2413:
2274:
2077:
1668:
1568:
1354:
353:
a long sentence, but it is not at all unusual to have long sentences in a synopsis to keep the action flowing quickly.
35:
1567:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
974:
2009:
I added it since it's in the article you sourced it from. I also moved the section as it's not part of the plot.
1576:
838:
1272:
article, I think we should try to work this article out for a potential GA. While I've contacted other users and
1786:
So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~
44:
1999:
1991:
1986:
Hi, shouldn't we also add that Delphi is a candidate (maybe in less forceful terms) to the list? Kind regards,
507:
2711:
2623:
2533:
2389:
2250:
2053:
1644:
1330:
1041:
775:
502:
removed and you keep reverting. I would propose to stop changing/reverting until consensus is reached there.
2487:
2458:
1910:
1712:
1158:
1121:
1084:
1012:
961:
734:
720:
687:
653:
619:
238:
191:
155:
2181:
1524:
1113:
1076:
1033:
1004:
813:
767:
551:
230:
183:
147:
1475:
1382:
1375:
930:
559:
1273:
2483:
2454:
2327:
1532:
902:
867:
531:
2323:
926:
898:
863:
548:
who spread lies about Haile Selassie I on this Earth, because the Truth ALWAYS comes out in the end.
2164:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
1965:
1483:
1254:
2693:
2605:
2516:
2372:
2233:
2040:
1631:
1317:
1299:
2343:
2148:
1995:
1987:
1858:
1791:
1422:
1381:
Please take note of my remarks and suggestions with respect to full protection and edit warring at
1244:
821:
503:
481:
467:
382:
367:
2707:
2619:
2529:
2385:
2246:
2049:
1704:
a sequel to all the other films that preceded it - so should keep the cats that you also removed?
1640:
1326:
1725:
1708:
1285:
1213:
1189:
986:
50:
120:
544:
Do you realize that you are witnessing against your self and against your own life that it was
2207:
1888:
1775:
1606:
412:
2719:
2631:
2541:
2397:
2258:
2061:
1652:
1338:
437:
Thanks for your reply, Mezigue! I'm so glad we respect each other enough to talk about this.
2742:
2654:
2564:
2420:
2281:
1759:
1528:
1502:
1277:
1181:
1169:
715:
is just for the year (1871). The author is highly debated: that's the historical reality. --
526:
46:
21:
2722:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2715:
2634:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2627:
2544:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2537:
2400:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2393:
2261:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2254:
2064:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2057:
1951:
1655:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1648:
1341:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1334:
1956:
1479:
1403:
1250:
1052:
Thanks for the heads-up. I do keep an eye on that page, but things do slip by sometimes.
586:
319:
305:
275:
222:
could have typed that in and then claim "consensus" because it's "in the article" despite
682:
has been created eleven years before deLisle's Marseillaise. I hope I was clear. Thanks--
2184:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
1498:
1023:
445:
will happen is someone will think we left some of the story out, which we certainly did!
2339:
2144:
1854:
1806:
1787:
1418:
817:
477:
463:
378:
363:
2326:
is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the
2198:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1853:
I'm glad you liked it M. Excellent use of templates on your part :-) Wassail cheers.
1597:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1281:
1209:
1185:
982:
69:
2469:
2319:
2203:
2199:
2133:
2010:
1880:
1840:
1736:
1602:
1598:
1548:
1386:
1224:
1136:
1096:
1053:
883:
843:
698:
664:
634:
571:
420:
287:
203:
166:
130:
112:
86:
2684:
2596:
2508:
2364:
2225:
2031:
1622:
1308:
2109:
1540:
1269:
1217:
792:
1433:
391:). No offence taken at all but I will also explain myself and disagree partly.
918:
800:
596:
315:
301:
271:
760:
international wikipedia agenda. If you don't believe me, check it out on the
1223:
No your edit was textbook POV-pushing. The dubious source is Counterpunch.
1045:
499:
129:
I am sorry to hear that someone smelly came to your disco, but it wasn't me.
1874:
I'm trying to find a better reference (this one is a primary source), but
2169:
879:
2726:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2638:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2548:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2404:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2265:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2068:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1659:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1345:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
48:
2703:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
2615:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
2526:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
2382:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
2243:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1547:
Erm, that is not a good idea. Mickey Mouse is a fictional character.
1700:
edit in that Hallows Part 2 is not a sequel to Part 1, but surely it
1572:
952:
761:
416:
2757:
2669:
2579:
2491:
2477:
2462:
2434:
2346:
2295:
2211:
2151:
2090:
2018:
2003:
1975:
1937:
1914:
1894:
1861:
1848:
1794:
1744:
1716:
1681:
1610:
1556:
1487:
1425:
1389:
1367:
1293:
1258:
1232:
1197:
1162:
1144:
1125:
1104:
1088:
1061:
1016:
990:
968:
934:
906:
891:
871:
851:
829:
738:
724:
706:
691:
672:
657:
642:
623:
603:
579:
563:
534:
511:
485:
471:
428:
371:
323:
309:
295:
279:
242:
211:
195:
174:
159:
138:
94:
79:
523:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Til Eulenspiegel/Archive
2739:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
2651:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
2561:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
2417:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
2278:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
862:
Just curious as to what you meant by "out of control linkage".
401:
2729:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
2697:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
2641:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
2609:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
2551:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
2407:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
2268:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
2071:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1662:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1348:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
2520:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
2376:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
912:
Doctor Who alternate timeline, parallel universe, worlds, etc.
51:
15:
1465:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1447:
1499:
there have been previous non-canon "Multi-Master stories"
2237:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
1875:
2710:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2622:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2532:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2444:
Are you not suspicious that perhaps you might be a bit
2388:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2249:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2168:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
2052:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1697:
1643:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1571:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1329:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
593:
1276:
to help weigh in on discussions that I've created at
525:
who pretty much hates me as you will have gathered.
457:
avalanche one is more accurate and therefore better.
1456:
Talk:List_of_Harry_Potter_characters#Moaning_Myrtle
1954:and should not be editing that page at all. -
300:I sense it will be pointless arguing with you.
1563:Disambiguation link notification for October 6
729:You (we) can not hide this historical truth.--
2160:Disambiguation link notification for April 23
1110:So, you're equalizing consensus with truth?
8:
975:Talk:Doctor Who (series 9)#Episode Groupings
286:whole saga in an article about a character.
1135:dictionary article about the word "canon".
2503:
2359:
2220:
1522:
1454:Hello, Mezigue. You have new messages at
1398:
1180:You are invited to join the discussion at
1111:
1074:
1031:
1002:
765:
549:
228:
181:
145:
332:To avoid an edit war over Tintin in Tibet
100:
2107:
1930:2A00:23C1:6C21:CF01:B965:8914:1607:2DAF
764:article. --12:43, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
1383:Talk:Christine Lagarde#Full protection
1497:I had to double-check but apparently
7:
2694:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
2606:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
2517:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
2373:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
2234:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
2166:List of Disney's Fantasia characters
2041:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
1632:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
1318:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1182:Talk:Darth Vader#Appearances section
1170:Talk:Darth Vader#Appearances section
1068:Why is it editorialising on my part?
2712:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2678:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
2624:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2590:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
2534:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2500:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
2390:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2356:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
2251:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2054:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1645:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1331:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1243:I undid your revert in the article
951:
449:Or "footprints". What do you think?
2217:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
2025:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
1616:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
14:
2683:
2595:
2507:
2363:
2312:
2224:
2108:
2030:
1758:
1621:
1432:
1402:
1307:
1175:
20:
2733:and submit your choices on the
2645:and submit your choices on the
2555:and submit your choices on the
2411:and submit your choices on the
2272:and submit your choices on the
2075:and submit your choices on the
1839:to you, and a happy new year.
1689:Deathly Hallows - sequel status
1666:and submit your choices on the
101:You're a Hipster with an agenda
2038:Hello, Mezigue. Voting in the
1900:Disney live-action adaptations
1629:Hello, Mezigue. Voting in the
1315:Hello, Mezigue. Voting in the
1198:09:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
2758:00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
2670:00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
2580:00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
2435:01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
2347:22:24, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
2296:00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
2152:03:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
2091:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1895:22:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
1881:
1862:00:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
1849:00:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
1795:23:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
1745:22:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
1717:22:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
1426:17:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
1390:03:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
1368:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1294:03:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
324:22:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
310:22:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
2129:A Child's Christmas in Wales
1889:
1682:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
1413:Season's Greetings, Mezigue!
1408:
1259:10:25, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
1233:08:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
1218:01:59, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
486:21:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
472:22:11, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
429:19:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
372:18:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
296:22:13, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
280:21:37, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
243:19:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
212:08:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
196:04:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
175:08:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
160:05:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
139:08:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
121:00:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
95:15:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
80:15:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
2492:13:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
2478:12:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
2463:12:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
1994:) 15:45, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1811:. A tremendously merry
1611:11:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
1569:The Jungle Book (2016 film)
1488:18:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
1431:
1409:
1352:and submit your choices on
1163:17:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
1145:17:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
1126:17:05, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
1105:16:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
1089:16:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
462:Let me know your thoughts.
2776:
2750:MediaWiki message delivery
2662:MediaWiki message delivery
2572:MediaWiki message delivery
2427:MediaWiki message delivery
2288:MediaWiki message delivery
2212:09:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
2083:MediaWiki message delivery
1915:12:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
1773:From Stave one of Dickens
1674:MediaWiki message delivery
1557:20:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
1541:02:37, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
1401:
1360:MediaWiki message delivery
1350:the candidates' statements
1062:07:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
1046:01:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
969:16:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
935:15:03, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
907:18:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
892:13:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
872:11:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
852:21:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
830:21:31, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
739:14:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
725:14:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
707:14:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
692:13:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
673:13:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
658:13:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
643:13:04, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
624:12:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
604:20:37, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
2324:"Dancing Dan's Christmas"
2114:
1757:
1508:
1202:
1017:01:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
580:15:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
564:14:42, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
535:13:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
512:16:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
2747:to your user talk page.
2659:to your user talk page.
2569:to your user talk page.
2473:
2425:to your user talk page.
2286:to your user talk page.
2019:15:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
2014:
2004:15:45, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1976:00:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
1938:23:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
1844:
1740:
1552:
1411:
1228:
1140:
1100:
1057:
991:18:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
887:
847:
702:
668:
638:
575:
424:
291:
207:
170:
134:
116:
90:
1696:I generally agree with
1203:Dieudonne M'bala M'bala
2335:
2142:
1785:
1476:Charlie Hebdo shooting
1470:Charlie Hebdo shooting
1452:
1376:Talk:Christine Lagarde
2708:Arbitration Committee
2691:Hello! Voting in the
2620:Arbitration Committee
2603:Hello! Voting in the
2530:Arbitration Committee
2514:Hello! Voting in the
2386:Arbitration Committee
2370:Hello! Voting in the
2330:
2247:Arbitration Committee
2231:Hello! Voting in the
2137:
2050:Arbitration Committee
1780:
1641:Arbitration Committee
1505:07:52, 17 April 2017
1451:
1327:Arbitration Committee
1300:ArbCom Elections 2016
1022:
858:An unexpected Journey
570:Can't say that I do.
2448:about Charlie Hebdo?
2200:opt-out instructions
1952:conflict of interest
1920:Matthew Gordon Banks
1599:opt-out instructions
1493:Multi-Master stories
1030:not in good spirit
981:time to contribute.
2178:fix with Dab solver
1581:fix with Dab solver
1264:Darth Vader article
1245:Gnomes (South Park)
1239:Gnomes (South Park)
921:'s page tweaked to
2724:arbitration policy
2636:arbitration policy
2546:arbitration policy
2402:arbitration policy
2263:arbitration policy
2190:• Join us at the
2180:). Such links are
2066:arbitration policy
1657:arbitration policy
1589:• Join us at the
1509:Mickey's Signature
1463:remove this notice
1453:
1343:arbitration policy
1302:: Voting now open!
1268:Hi. Regarding the
950:talk about it. --
609:About Marseillaise
266:Unnecessary detail
2760:
2672:
2587:
2586:
2582:
2441:
2440:
2353:
2352:
2328:hot Tom and Jerry
2302:
2301:
2195:
2182:usually incorrect
2157:
2156:
1973:
1946:talk page stalker
1905:understand it. --
1803:Ha ha, very good
1800:
1799:
1776:A Christmas Carol
1594:
1543:
1527:comment added by
1521:Thanks so much.
1440:
1439:
1128:
1116:comment added by
1091:
1079:comment added by
1048:
1036:comment added by
1019:
1007:comment added by
966:
956:
833:
816:comment added by
779:
770:comment added by
566:
554:comment added by
521:Thanks. That was
494:MH370 - "However"
413:dangling modifier
245:
233:comment added by
198:
186:comment added by
162:
150:comment added by
57:
56:
2767:
2748:
2746:
2687:
2660:
2658:
2599:
2570:
2568:
2511:
2504:
2424:
2367:
2360:
2316:
2309:
2308:
2285:
2228:
2221:
2185:
2174:check to confirm
2118:Happy Christmas!
2112:
2105:
2104:
2034:
1974:
1970:
1963:
1961:
1949:
1891:
1885:
1838:
1835:
1832:
1829:
1826:
1823:
1820:
1817:
1814:
1810:
1762:
1755:
1754:
1729:
1625:
1584:
1577:check to confirm
1466:
1436:
1429:
1415:
1406:
1399:
1311:
1278:Talk:Darth Vader
1179:
1178:
967:
958:
955:
882:. All the best.
832:
810:
540:Haile Selassie I
529:
76:
73:
52:
24:
16:
2775:
2774:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2740:
2688:
2680:
2675:
2674:
2652:
2600:
2592:
2562:
2502:
2450:
2418:
2358:
2307:
2279:
2219:
2192:DPL WikiProject
2162:
2103:
2095:
2094:
2035:
2027:
1984:
1966:
1957:
1955:
1943:
1922:
1902:
1872:
1836:
1833:
1830:
1827:
1824:
1821:
1818:
1815:
1812:
1804:
1753:
1723:
1691:
1686:
1685:
1626:
1618:
1591:DPL WikiProject
1565:
1511:
1495:
1474:In the article
1472:
1467:
1460:
1445:
1397:
1379:
1372:
1371:
1355:the voting page
1312:
1304:
1266:
1241:
1205:
1176:
1173:
1070:
1027:
998:
978:
965:
947:Deathly Hallows
942:
940:RE: Ron Weasley
914:
860:
811:
785:
757:
611:
600:
591:
587:La Marseillaise
542:
527:
519:
496:
338:Tintin in Tibet
334:
268:
103:
74:
71:
65:
53:
47:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2773:
2771:
2731:the candidates
2700:eligible users
2689:
2682:
2681:
2679:
2676:
2643:the candidates
2612:eligible users
2601:
2594:
2593:
2591:
2588:
2585:
2584:
2553:the candidates
2523:eligible users
2512:
2501:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2449:
2442:
2439:
2438:
2409:the candidates
2379:eligible users
2368:
2357:
2354:
2351:
2350:
2320:Damon Runyon's
2317:
2306:
2303:
2300:
2299:
2270:the candidates
2240:eligible users
2229:
2218:
2215:
2161:
2158:
2155:
2154:
2125:
2124:Hello Mezigue,
2121:
2120:
2115:
2113:
2102:
2099:
2097:
2073:the candidates
2036:
2029:
2028:
2026:
2023:
2022:
2021:
1996:Britishfinance
1988:Britishfinance
1983:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1924:Dear Mezigue,
1921:
1918:
1901:
1898:
1871:
1870:S. M. Stirling
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1798:
1797:
1769:
1768:
1766:Happy Holidays
1763:
1752:
1751:Happy Holidays
1749:
1748:
1747:
1690:
1687:
1664:the candidates
1627:
1620:
1619:
1617:
1614:
1564:
1561:
1560:
1559:
1510:
1507:
1494:
1491:
1471:
1468:
1459:
1446:
1444:
1441:
1438:
1437:
1430:
1416:
1407:
1396:
1393:
1378:
1373:
1313:
1306:
1305:
1303:
1297:
1265:
1262:
1240:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1204:
1201:
1172:
1168:Discussion at
1166:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1108:
1107:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1026:
1021:
997:
994:
977:
972:
959:
941:
938:
913:
910:
895:
894:
859:
856:
855:
854:
787:Dear Mezigue,
784:
781:
756:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
727:
610:
607:
598:
590:
584:
583:
582:
541:
538:
518:
517:Haile Selassie
515:
504:Rentzepopoulos
495:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
474:
460:
459:
458:
450:
446:
442:
432:
431:
408:
405:
404:'s—are found"?
397:
393:
392:
359:
358:
354:
350:
346:
333:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
312:
267:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
165:No you don't.
102:
99:
98:
97:
64:
61:
59:
55:
54:
49:
45:
43:
40:
39:
31:
30:
25:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2772:
2761:
2759:
2755:
2751:
2744:
2738:
2737:
2732:
2727:
2725:
2721:
2717:
2713:
2709:
2704:
2702:
2701:
2696:
2695:
2686:
2677:
2673:
2671:
2667:
2663:
2656:
2650:
2649:
2644:
2639:
2637:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2616:
2614:
2613:
2608:
2607:
2598:
2589:
2583:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2566:
2560:
2559:
2554:
2549:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2531:
2525:
2524:
2519:
2518:
2513:
2510:
2506:
2505:
2499:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2484:AnyDosMilVint
2481:
2480:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2460:
2456:
2455:AnyDosMilVint
2447:
2443:
2437:
2436:
2432:
2428:
2422:
2416:
2415:
2410:
2405:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2381:
2380:
2375:
2374:
2369:
2366:
2362:
2361:
2355:
2349:
2348:
2345:
2341:
2334:
2329:
2325:
2321:
2318:
2315:
2311:
2310:
2304:
2298:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2283:
2277:
2276:
2271:
2266:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2242:
2241:
2236:
2235:
2230:
2227:
2223:
2222:
2216:
2214:
2213:
2209:
2205:
2201:
2196:
2193:
2189:
2183:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2167:
2159:
2153:
2150:
2146:
2141:
2135:
2131:
2130:
2123:
2122:
2119:
2116:
2111:
2106:
2100:
2098:
2093:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2079:
2074:
2069:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2046:
2043:
2042:
2033:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1981:
1977:
1971:
1969:
1962:
1960:
1953:
1947:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1925:
1919:
1917:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1907:84.78.248.145
1899:
1897:
1896:
1892:
1886:
1884:
1877:
1869:
1863:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1808:
1802:
1801:
1796:
1793:
1789:
1784:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1771:
1770:
1767:
1764:
1761:
1756:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1727:
1726:Chaheel Riens
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1709:Chaheel Riens
1705:
1703:
1699:
1694:
1688:
1684:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1670:
1665:
1660:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1637:
1634:
1633:
1624:
1615:
1613:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1595:
1592:
1588:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1519:
1518:
1514:
1506:
1504:
1500:
1492:
1490:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1469:
1464:
1457:
1450:
1443:December 2016
1442:
1435:
1428:
1427:
1424:
1420:
1414:
1405:
1400:
1394:
1392:
1391:
1388:
1385:. Thank you.
1384:
1377:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1323:
1320:
1319:
1310:
1301:
1298:
1296:
1295:
1291:
1290:contributions
1287:
1283:
1282:Lord Sjones23
1279:
1275:
1271:
1263:
1261:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1246:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1200:
1199:
1195:
1194:contributions
1191:
1187:
1186:Lord Sjones23
1183:
1171:
1167:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1155:91.248.46.114
1146:
1142:
1138:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1118:91.248.46.114
1115:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1081:91.248.46.114
1078:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1038:89.243.99.144
1035:
1025:
1024:Harry's Place
1020:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1009:92.13.217.108
1006:
995:
993:
992:
988:
984:
976:
973:
971:
970:
964:
963:
954:
948:
939:
937:
936:
932:
928:
924:
920:
911:
909:
908:
904:
900:
893:
889:
885:
881:
876:
875:
874:
873:
869:
865:
857:
853:
849:
845:
840:
839:verifiability
836:
835:
834:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
807:
806:Yours truly,
804:
802:
796:
794:
788:
782:
780:
777:
773:
772:87.104.197.78
769:
763:
754:
740:
736:
732:
731:93.35.217.105
728:
726:
722:
718:
717:93.35.217.105
714:
710:
709:
708:
704:
700:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
684:93.35.217.105
681:
676:
675:
674:
670:
666:
661:
660:
659:
655:
651:
650:93.35.217.105
646:
645:
644:
640:
636:
632:
628:
627:
626:
625:
621:
617:
616:93.35.217.105
608:
606:
605:
602:
595:
588:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
568:
567:
565:
561:
557:
553:
547:
539:
537:
536:
533:
530:
524:
516:
514:
513:
509:
505:
501:
493:
487:
483:
479:
475:
473:
469:
465:
461:
455:
452:I think they
451:
447:
443:
439:
438:
436:
435:
434:
433:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
409:
406:
403:
398:
395:
394:
390:
387:
384:
380:
376:
375:
374:
373:
369:
365:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
339:
331:
325:
321:
317:
313:
311:
307:
303:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
284:
283:
282:
281:
277:
273:
265:
244:
240:
236:
235:67.83.143.151
232:
225:
221:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
200:
199:
197:
193:
189:
188:67.83.143.151
185:
178:
177:
176:
172:
168:
164:
163:
161:
157:
153:
152:67.83.143.151
149:
142:
141:
140:
136:
132:
128:
127:
124:
123:
122:
118:
114:
109:
108:
107:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
82:
81:
78:
77:
63:Ian McDiarmid
62:
60:
42:
41:
38:
37:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
2734:
2728:
2705:
2698:
2692:
2690:
2646:
2640:
2617:
2610:
2604:
2602:
2556:
2550:
2527:
2521:
2515:
2451:
2445:
2412:
2406:
2383:
2377:
2371:
2336:
2331:
2322:short story
2273:
2267:
2244:
2238:
2232:
2197:
2163:
2138:
2127:
2117:
2096:
2076:
2070:
2047:
2039:
2037:
1985:
1982:Cursed Child
1968:open channel
1967:
1958:
1926:
1923:
1903:
1882:
1873:
1781:
1774:
1772:
1765:
1732:
1706:
1701:
1695:
1693:Hi Mezigue.
1692:
1667:
1661:
1638:
1630:
1628:
1596:
1566:
1523:— Preceding
1520:
1515:
1512:
1496:
1473:
1412:
1410:
1380:
1353:
1347:
1324:
1316:
1314:
1267:
1249:
1242:
1206:
1174:
1151:
1112:— Preceding
1109:
1075:— Preceding
1071:
1032:— Preceding
1028:
1003:— Preceding
999:
979:
960:
946:
943:
927:TardisTybort
922:
915:
896:
861:
812:— Preceding
808:
805:
797:
789:
786:
783:Alan Rickman
766:— Preceding
758:
712:
679:
630:
612:
592:
556:172.56.2.150
550:— Preceding
545:
543:
520:
497:
453:
385:
360:
337:
335:
269:
229:— Preceding
223:
219:
182:— Preceding
146:— Preceding
104:
70:
66:
58:
34:
26:
2736:voting page
2648:voting page
2558:voting page
2414:voting page
2275:voting page
2132:the young
2101:Merry Merry
2078:voting page
1669:voting page
1529:Bobby232332
1395:Merry Merry
1270:Darth Vader
899:Warnphoenix
864:Warnphoenix
809:Lembowman
793:Rima Horton
594:take a look
589:and IP user
528:Doug Weller
400:tracks—the
2720:topic bans
2632:topic bans
2542:topic bans
2398:topic bans
2259:topic bans
2202:. Thanks,
2186:(Read the
2062:topic bans
1959:FlightTime
1653:topic bans
1601:. Thanks,
1480:Cwmhiraeth
1339:topic bans
996:Benny Hill
919:Rose Tyler
801:Marc Bolan
417:anthropoid
2716:site bans
2628:site bans
2538:site bans
2394:site bans
2340:MarnetteD
2255:site bans
2145:MarnetteD
2126:Early in
2058:site bans
1855:MarnetteD
1807:MarnetteD
1788:MarnetteD
1733:generally
1649:site bans
1585:Read the
1419:MarnetteD
1335:site bans
923:something
818:Lembowman
500:User:John
478:Prhartcom
464:Prhartcom
379:Prhartcom
364:Prhartcom
2170:Toontown
1537:contribs
1525:unsigned
1461:You can
1210:MortWill
1114:unsigned
1077:unsigned
1034:unsigned
1005:unsigned
983:Fan4Life
962:contribs
880:MOS:LINK
826:contribs
814:unsigned
768:unsigned
713:probably
680:probably
614:Thanks--
552:unsigned
389:contribs
231:unsigned
184:unsigned
148:unsigned
27:Archives
2743:NoACEMM
2655:NoACEMM
2565:NoACEMM
2470:Mezigue
2421:NoACEMM
2282:NoACEMM
2204:DPL bot
2011:Mezigue
1890:discuss
1883:Tarl N.
1841:Mezigue
1737:Mezigue
1603:DPL bot
1549:Mezigue
1387:Samsara
1274:WT:FILM
1251:BioGeek
1225:Mezigue
1137:Mezigue
1097:Mezigue
1054:Mezigue
884:Mezigue
844:Mezigue
755:Morgoth
699:Mezigue
665:Mezigue
635:Mezigue
572:Mezigue
421:Mezigue
288:Mezigue
204:Mezigue
167:Mezigue
131:Mezigue
113:Mezigue
87:Mezigue
2305:Cheers
1573:Python
925:else?
762:Sauron
377:Hello
224:NO ONE
2446:wrong
2333:true.
2134:Dylan
1722:Hiya
316:WillE
302:WillE
272:WillE
2754:talk
2706:The
2666:talk
2618:The
2576:talk
2528:The
2488:talk
2474:talk
2459:talk
2431:talk
2384:The
2344:Talk
2292:talk
2245:The
2208:talk
2149:Talk
2087:talk
2048:The
2015:talk
2000:talk
1992:talk
1934:talk
1911:talk
1876:this
1859:Talk
1845:talk
1792:Talk
1741:talk
1713:talk
1698:this
1678:talk
1639:The
1607:talk
1553:talk
1533:talk
1484:talk
1423:Talk
1364:talk
1325:The
1286:talk
1255:talk
1229:talk
1214:talk
1190:talk
1159:talk
1141:talk
1122:talk
1101:talk
1085:talk
1058:talk
1042:talk
1013:talk
987:talk
931:talk
903:talk
888:talk
868:talk
848:talk
822:talk
776:talk
735:talk
721:talk
703:talk
688:talk
669:talk
654:talk
639:talk
620:talk
576:talk
560:talk
532:talk
508:talk
482:talk
468:talk
425:talk
402:Yeti
383:talk
368:talk
320:talk
306:talk
292:talk
276:talk
239:talk
208:talk
192:talk
171:talk
156:talk
135:talk
117:talk
91:talk
75:5969
72:Onel
2188:FAQ
1587:FAQ
1184:.
711:My
546:you
454:are
220:YOU
2756:)
2745:}}
2741:{{
2718:,
2668:)
2657:}}
2653:{{
2630:,
2578:)
2567:}}
2563:{{
2540:,
2490:)
2476:)
2461:)
2433:)
2423:}}
2419:{{
2396:,
2294:)
2284:}}
2280:{{
2257:,
2210:)
2194:.)
2176:|
2089:)
2081:.
2060:,
2017:)
2002:)
1936:)
1913:)
1893:)
1847:)
1743:)
1715:)
1702:is
1680:)
1672:.
1651:,
1609:)
1579:|
1555:)
1539:)
1535:•
1503:🐦
1486:)
1366:)
1358:.
1337:,
1292:)
1288:-
1257:)
1231:)
1216:)
1196:)
1192:-
1161:)
1143:)
1124:)
1103:)
1087:)
1060:)
1044:)
1015:)
989:)
933:)
905:)
890:)
870:)
850:)
828:)
824:•
778:)
737:)
723:)
705:)
690:)
671:)
656:)
641:)
631:is
622:)
578:)
562:)
510:)
484:)
470:)
427:)
370:)
322:)
308:)
294:)
278:)
241:)
210:)
194:)
173:)
158:)
137:)
119:)
93:)
2752:(
2664:(
2574:(
2486:(
2472:(
2457:(
2429:(
2342:|
2290:(
2206:(
2172:(
2147:|
2085:(
2013:(
1998:(
1990:(
1972:)
1964:(
1948:)
1944:(
1932:(
1909:(
1887:(
1857:|
1843:(
1837:s
1834:a
1831:m
1828:t
1825:s
1822:i
1819:r
1816:h
1813:C
1809::
1805:@
1790:|
1739:(
1728::
1724:@
1711:(
1676:(
1605:(
1593:.
1575:(
1551:(
1531:(
1501:-
1482:(
1458:.
1421:|
1362:(
1284:(
1253:(
1227:(
1212:(
1188:(
1157:(
1139:(
1120:(
1099:(
1083:(
1056:(
1040:(
1011:(
985:(
957:/
953:S
929:(
901:(
886:(
866:(
846:(
820:(
774:(
733:(
719:(
701:(
686:(
667:(
652:(
637:(
618:(
601:O
599:2
597:H
574:(
558:(
506:(
480:(
466:(
423:(
386:·
381:(
366:(
318:(
304:(
290:(
274:(
237:(
206:(
190:(
169:(
154:(
133:(
115:(
89:(
36:1
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.