User talk:Michaelbusch - Knowledge (XXG)

741:

science be tolerated. The primary weakness of Knowledge (XXG) has been demonstrated all too well, that it assumes that an article is mainly based on a signficant number of neutral, academic sources and that neutral editors hold the balance in in RFCs and consensus, which is often only the case for more well established subjects. Accuracy comparisons with Britanica, for example, do not accurately present that there is no comparison for the multitude of fring articles no other encylopedia encourages. Fringe topics and claims simply draw dedicated fringe editing support while balanced editors simply don't put the same amount of effort into pointing out the subject is fringe and refuting the nonsense as fringers put into creating "sources", nor do academics put the same effort into refuting the nonsense as fringers and cultist put into trying to find some academics willing to accept exploitation, thus seemingly reasonable Wikipedian principles simply breakdown in such extreme situations. That NPOV is to be valued first before civility according to Wikipedian policies is simply ignored. It seems that those boards who should be policing these articles simply accept that fringe articles can contain fringe nonsense because discerning readers will be turned off and that fringe friendly admins are more likely to engage and aid in frustrating true NPOV as you can see from this example. Only when you can engage a majority of editors coming from a more balanced view willing to hang together along with more balanced admins to take on these fringe editors one article at a time and trim obscure articles can you really accomplish much. That hasn't happened yet, and it may not until Knowledge (XXG) begins to lose more credibility, as it should. I no longer have time for such uphill struggles to support NPOV, better to let Knowledge (XXG) lose credibility than give the false appearance of meaningful consensus with fringers. Good luck. --

576:

basis alone, I think the material could be reinstated. As for scientific majority, I'm really not sure, I know that inflationary cosmology isn't a new idea being extended by both Guth, Steve Hawking and a myriad of others. I think that if John Barrow is talking about advanced civilization in terms of K-IV, K-V... I must only assume that other scientist are doing the same. Through the help of the community I hope we can find others.

495:

can be cited. The last part of the book chapters 27. Extraterrestrial life: an idea whose time has come 30. If we succeed … 33. Astroengineering; 34. Twenty questions: a classification of cosmic civilisations 38. Starfolk II. A future; 39. Starfolk III. The cosmic Cheshire cats; talks about nothing else other than how we would detect, talk to, and become an advanced civilization and what we'd have to do, in order to get there.

1372:, but besides that I don't know if the article itself has issues that other editors could address. I can imagine that some people might prefer a shorter article, and I notice some direct quotes are given in full, but other than that I don't know what is amiss. The article seems to clearly make the point that Mills' theories aren't accepted by mainstream scientists. I notice that the references might be tidied up and put into 1115: 445: 2327: 1954: 2025: 1035:

advocate. I think I said it in my last comments at Super-Earth, and you'll read that when you get back, so I will leave it at that. There is a lot I could learn from you as I am heading in that direction, and I dare say a least I've learn not to overlook userpages anymore when I get into discussions. A sheepish Thanks.

487:

part of why I was reading independent material on the subject was that I found it interesting, and alot of the speculation is interesting. And it's not as if the speculation wasn't backed up, it's just that whoever added it in, didn't cite the work properly. Which is fine, cuz I now know where the timeline came from...

1396:, and that another editor removes it completely a few hours later. Stolper then puts back his version a day or so later, and claims that the editor who removed it is part of an organized campaign against Mills. Now, Stolper's COI and POV issues are obvious, and given his unwillingness to cooperate and lack of 1856:

rules. I not believe to value of uncertain 50%, because this is too much (from 300m to 900m). Thus and so i believe in public NASA sources. Your source (book in prep.) is not available now, and so its not verifiable (for now). If you work in JPL, then you may post to NASA more correct data. Knowledge

761:

Therein is the problem: people use Knowledge (XXG). Therefore we must make it better. We make it better, it gets used more. It gets used more, it becomes more of a target for fringe ideas, POV-pushing, and other forms of vandalism. More bad editing equals more time spent cleaning up and less time

506:

But I found the article to be interesting because of the speculation... the speculation is important in referenced sci-fiction works and I think the whole idea of wikipedia is not only to give factual information... which I think can still be done with the timeline, etc, but also to inspire people to

486:

Well I come back to the page and a lot of it disappeared, your revisions. I kind of looked at what changes you made and realized that you pretty much deleted speculative content and much of the timeline which of course borders on psuedo-science, so I can understand why you made the revisions. However

26:

As of March 26, 2008, I'm leaving the project - I've tried taking breaks, but whenever I come back, it takes too much time from other things. I'd like any passing Admin to put my account into stasis, just to discourage the 'wonder what's going on with ... what happened to the last hour?' incidents.

1876:

for my response to this. Here, I will simply quote from the page Камень is getting the 560 m diameter estimate from: "... the diameter estimate should be considered only approximate, but in most cases will be accurate to within a factor of two." The risk page is not designed to be the final source

840:

is pretty clear that users may put just about anything, or delete anything on their user pages. Deleting stuff on their talk pages clearly proves they read it. I know its a common mistake to think they should keep warnings on their talk page, but you can still read them on the history of the page,

343:

is revert warring. As far scientific consensus, yes I'm sure if the scientific community were polled on this movie there were would indeed be the consensus that some of the aspects of the movie are pseudoscience...but this polling hasn't been done for this movie, there are no sources for it, and so

1400:

contributions elsewhere on the encyclopedia, I would ban him completely. If you examine the article history, you can view the version of the article he would like. Stylistically, it is quite bad. Scientifically, it is bogus - it includes a flat statement that quantum mechanics is wrong. This is

706:

Hi, Michaelbusch. I feel bad to always be opposing you in Bleep. It's nothing personal. And I respect your desire to improve Knowledge (XXG). No doubt in the end truth will triumph, whatever truth that turns out to be. Knowledge (XXG) is an odd situation, and not at all comfortable for me. Wish you

561:

I feel that much of the articles construction has seemed like original research because it's hard to find laymen terms to civilizations IV and above, most of it's talked about in Sci-fi circles, which I'm not interested in advancing. So, your absolutely right, we're looking for scientific research,

494:

discusses possible timelines for astroengineering feats and talks a little about what you'd expect from an advanced civilization. This is speculation, but it's speculation done from a well-known cosmologist; who inspired millions of people to be serious about SETI projects around the world. And it

1927:

Reviewed, and since I've always been so civil, why would you suggest I review it, unless you were implying that I've not been civil at some point? Since that is not true, I'd say your implicitly and ironically making an uncivil remark. Looking at your talk page, I see you have become uncivil with

1794:

Michael your contributions to the astronomical articles will not be forgotten. Take care of yourself. An extended break from wikipedia could be a good thing. Some times we all need a fresh perspective on life. My father recently passed away and I know I am re-considering a lot of things... --

575:

As far as interests of the majority vs. the minority, and the development of information based on the majority view, I think the idea of advanced civilizations is a concept that most Sci-Fi enthusiasts are very familiar with and do represent a significant proportion of majority interests. On that

740:

IMO, Knowledge (XXG) has become a playground for dedicated fringers to push psuedoscientific and fringe nonsense such as "Bleep", among many other subjects, that would never probably not even worth an article in a conventional encyclopedia, nor would the obvious COI, POVing and misapplication of

498:

As far as the sub section Extensions of the Original Scale that is an extension of Kardashev's work in his lecture Kardashev, Nikolai (1985). "On the Inevitability and the Possible Structures of Supercivilizations" in "The search for extraterrestrial life: Recent developments; Proceedings of the

655:

talk page. I thought what I had to say was pertinent to the fictional nature of the discussions already present on the page. I want to present my thoughts in a manner that will be accepted in the Knowledge (XXG) community. Given the ideas I intended to present, how would you have handled the

1034:

Jesus! - I should have checked who I was talking with. You're one of the last people I would want to pick a fight with (at Super-Earth). But I'm also shocked that you of all people you would start on the defending side of assumptions: I guess someone had to play devil's advocate to the devil's

562:

which I think, I might be able to provide with the assistance of the community. I've made some progress in seeing scientific discussions by Dr. Michio Kaku, Dr. John Barrow, and Alan Guth to name a few, talking about advanced civilizations. So I think the article can be expanded in that area.

84:

I fear that Knowledge (XXG) is approaching the point where the rate of addition of new content is less than the rate of addition of new vandalism and junk - such that even with the current bots, most editing will end up being cleanup. I think I've done enough trash-picking here. Good luck.

1503: 502:

So I guess, what I'm saying is, I'd like the timeline, the extensions to the original scale, and the contact constraints back in. I'm cool if you add a big-whomping... this is psuedoscience, and speculation sticker on it cuz I can agree with that totally, but I think it does have value.

878:. I'm not giving you my opinion, I'm trying to politely say you accidently violated policy, granted with good intentions. User pages are pretty much off limits unless they are disruptive, and users clearly and unambiguously have the right to delete any warnings on their page. 991:

I appreciate your response and for removing the contribution to global warming. I think you were right. But the poster in national geographic is really something to see and it raises many questions and would be a great reference for the global warming page. Best Regards,

174:- because of all the pseudoscience I deal with. Only when it is unavoidable will I use the term to mean anything other than a set of ideas that have been tested by observational evidence - which doesn't really work for matters of meditation and states of consciousness. 420:

I found that I had lost all patience with the refusal of Dreadstar and TimidGuy to accept that the scientific community uniformly condemns What the Bleep, and thus I became uncivil. This is one reason I'm taking a break - the other is that I am enjoying my vacation.

1213:

No. I have explained each of my edits. You have not provided any rationale for the material I removed being included. If you can provide sufficiently compelling reasons, then the material can go back in. But in many cases, that isn't going to be possible.

507:

read, and look up information that isn't just in the wikipedia files.... And I'm telling you, that had the speculation portion of the timeline not been in this article, I would never have read Carl Sagan's book or searched for Kardashev's and others material.

324:. I have explained the sources and how they reflect consensus and the non-existence of any contrary statements three times, as have others. If you do not accept the consensus, that is your concern. Refusing to acknowledge its existence is folly, however. 2339:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

482:

Hi, I'm a new user so I apologize if this is an inappropriate way of talking about my concerns. My intent today was to add some critisisms about the timeline as well as supercivilizations Class IV and above, cuz I was doing some independent reading.

1701:

Hey, Michael, sorry to hear that you're leaving. I can relate to the time thing... hopefully, you'll be able to stick around in some capacity as it would be a real shame to lose you altogether. Best of luck, and hope to see you here again.

1190:

I see that you've removed more material from the article, don't you think it might be wise to settle the current dispute over material before you continue to remove more? I'm asking you to restore it all, until issue is settled. Please see

2113: 762:

spent adding content. Eventually, Knowledge (XXG) will reach a limit where the amount of good content flat lines. I don't think we're there yet, but even if that is the case, this is an interesting sociological experiment.

2033: 1173:

I removed material that was flagged as original research, unsupported, or was otherwise irrelevant. I've been out of circulation for the last several weeks, but I see no reason that my edits should be blanket reverted.

1391:

Ed, there aren't any problems with the current version of the article because it is not the version TStolper1W would like. The pattern for the last week has been that Stolper puts up his version, which I describe as

589:

Finally, I think talking about the reinstatement of the material by consensus is a great idea, in fact I'm a little confused why there wasn't more discussion on the removal. So I'll go ahead and start a thread on the

2367: 1301:

I disagree, and you still haven't illustrated any examples of the unclear language or how it "reads like a technical service manual". Again, can you be specific? I can't fix it if the criticism is simply "its bad".

594:

page. As for people agreeing with me in consensus, I suppose we'll just have to wait and see. And no I don't intend on starting an edit war by reinstating the material before a discussion can be made... hopefully

2222:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 154:

Hi, Michael. Just wanted to note that you reverted a change that was based on consensus, including Naturezak. See, for example, the outline that he created, which included the word "theory" in that heading.

1818: 338:

You're engaging in a revert war over that wording, the wording was added, it was then reverted and taken again to the talk page, and yet still reverted back into the article once again without consensus -

2351:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2399: 1764:

Protection is generally only employed when vandalism becomes a problem and isn't usually done unless there is a known threat. I'll add your page to my watchlist and intervene if there is a problem.

1825:, to which you have been a major contributor. I have a few concerns that should be addressed if the article is to remain listed as a GA. If you are able to help out, the reassessment can be found 2107: 1968:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 1911:

The sys-admins would agree with me on this, I'm afraid. Please do not make a scene. As I have said, there are electronic sources describing the radar observations, which I have linked on

1980: 55:- I just removed a bunch of un-necessary and POV material from these two pages. Please make sure the UFO enthusiasts don't go wild on it again. Probably the same level of monitoring as 237:

a bit, I am guessing that you refer to your views on "matters of meditation and states of consciousness" (cf. MWI) mentioned in "Theory" just above -- is that a correct interpretation?

1979:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

682:

Private messages may be sent by email (e.g. see the 'e-mail this user' link on the left-hand side of my userpage). Now, your thoughts are your own and you may say what you will, but

1468:

I like to put in the {{uw-xx#}} tags as well. They are more specific than just 'your page has been speedied'. Thanks for patrolling recent changes. 00:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

1528:

may be more appropriate depending on your situation and aspirations. We should get back to you within a day or so, once a coaching relationship has been identified. Thank you.

1154:

I've restored the article to a previous version, I've talked about the additions to the article at length and why I feel they are needed, but I haven't seen your input on the

1618:

the claim that Tunguska-like impacts in ocean areas would have gone unnoticed before satellite monitoring, justifying his changing the wording to that the Tunguska event is

1857:(XXG) base on sources, reliable verifiable sources. Sorry for this bureaucratism. Please do not delete text with links to current reliable sources. Sorry for my English.-- 252:

The above sentences do not make sense - meditation and consciousness are unrelated to interpretations of quantum mechanics. What I refer to is your statements about the

1517: 1513: 2179:, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on 798:

I see that you are correct. It did not matter in this case, but I must try to get out of that habit (I initially read 'other deletion discussion' to include speedy).

460: 1158:. I'm afraid I'm against block removal of large sections with minimal discussion about why your feel justified to do so... I hope to see you on the talk page. thx-- 2400:

http://books.google.com/books?id=0jRa1a4pD5IC&pg=PA133&dq=%22is+capable+of+manipulating+the+most+elementary+particles&sig=qilR_CGErLINTCc8dde2da76oV8

1747:

I'd like the pages semi-protected, and the account rendered inactive - I've already changed the password to something I won't remember. Michaelbusch via DHCP.

1237:

Given your user page I'll guess that you don't believe in telepathy, so may I humbly suggest that if you tag an article as unclear you mention on the talk page

1014:

I haven't seen it myself, but if you think it should be added, please describe why on the talk page and give a reference so that other editors can evaluate it.

1512:

program. We're currently engaged in a program reset to help things move more smoothly in the future. If you are still interested in the program, please go to

348:. There are no two ways about it. And please watch who you're calling dense. First, it cuts both ways, and is also an unnecessary, uncivil personal attack. 856:

I hold the opinion that warning messages, unless obviously spurious, should not be deleted. It makes it a lot easier to keep track of the warning history.

1130: 533:. The article is just fine without long paragraphs of whole-cloth discussion of one person's ideas. Please don't add back the material unless you have 2041: 1516:

and re-list yourself under Current requests, deleting your entry from Older requests. Also, double-check to make sure coaching is right for you at the

2128: 1345:

with Mills glorification again. I've taken a couple of whacks at cutting the nonsense back, but could use a more experienced Wiki hand for advice.

2095: 1676:

All right, but you're going to have to explain how the distribution of power usage is at all relevant to the sum of it. 17:33, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

2172: 1748: 1568:

I'm new to the Wiki Editing stuff, and I got your message, but I'm confused on what it is about and what I should do. Sorry for being nieve.

195: 2381: 2247: 2183:

and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my

557:

Thank you for your advice, I think I have a better understanding now of how we might improve this entry. Concerning reliable resources and

77:- do try to get the TMers from Maharishi University of Management to stop editing a page where they have such a big conflict of interest. 2089: 104: 2076: 1929: 1725:

By the way, what do you mean by "stasis" - would you like your pages semi-protected against vandalism, or what? (Just let me know.) --

1479:

Hallo - you tagged the article Jane Daniel. After all now I think there are enough published sources mentioned in the article ! yours

671: 1943: 1900: 1873: 1862: 2085: 1924:"Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). I recommend you to review the civility guidelines. Michaelbusch (talk) 20:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC)" 1915:. And please note that I am not pushing a paper that I am a co-author on. I merely know the field. 03:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 1637:

A Tunguska-like impact might have gone unnoticed in some parts of the Arctic ocean at that time, but anywhere else is problematic.

813: 2176: 976: 2292: 2262: 785:

Just a heads up, but db-repost is only articles deleted through Articles for Deletion (or other XFD's), not speedy deletions. --

2377: 2243: 686:

are not general forums. They are for discussion of the articles subject. Unrelated threads should be removed with prejudice.

2360: 2135: 1937: 213:

Yes. This happens to be the second most ridiculous ArbCom request I've ever seen, but I won't stop you from having your fun.

2058: 1393: 27:

Maybe I'll come back eventually, but in the meantime, here is a list of things that were in need of monitoring when I left:

1961: 1849: 1416: 1896: 1858: 2234:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1591: 1126: 456: 2372: 2239: 1895:

base on source. You book has in-prep. status. No book - no source! Sorry. Next your action will call sys-op justice.--

1735: 1712: 926: 170:

Yes, but I do not agree with that consensus - for the reasons I described. I'm a stickler for proper use of the word

1509: 1447:

There's maintenance text that you only need to copy-paste to their talk pages, letting them know their page has been

2101: 1420: 1040: 253: 2309: 2279: 1853: 1525: 1752: 1307: 1275: 1246: 820: 789: 68: 558: 530: 2066: 1834: 1457: 1432: 2348: 2048:

policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure

613:

Your statements above are verbose, and I'm afraid I don't understand them. Please don't post here - post to

1684: 1666: 1200: 1163: 637: 600: 515: 1969: 1003: 964: 659: 2300: 2270: 1965: 1947: 1933: 1658: 1350: 1063: 923: 667: 499:

Symposium, Boston, MA,June 18-21, 1984", as well as a paper he did later... that I'm still searching for.

2235: 1768: 1545:

I'm not editing enough at the moment for an Admin coach to be useful, I suspect. Thanks for the notice.

534: 1627: 1576: 1484: 1036: 997: 2053: 2004:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1521: 1572: 2180: 2009: 1381: 1303: 1271: 1242: 1192: 1155: 972: 955: 817: 786: 614: 591: 317: 292: 233:

A reply to your message on my talk page: Can you please be more specific? Reading between the lines

2335: 2317: 2211: 2202: 2049: 1364:. Can you say whether there are still problems with this article? I've only seen the discussion at 260:

article. I'd assumed this was obvious - that was, after all, the subject of your last few posts to

2121: 1830: 1453: 1428: 1318: 1129:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 459:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 353: 300: 2344: 2231: 2215: 42: 2192: 2184: 1780: 1680: 1662: 1196: 1159: 1138: 883: 846: 722:

You speak truth when you say that Knowledge (XXG) is strange. But it is unavoidable these days.

712: 633: 596: 511: 261: 238: 203: 160: 48: 1502: 1373: 651:

I'm pretty new to edits on Knowledge (XXG). You completely deleted all my contributions to the

2056:. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 841:

and it is their page to do with as they like, as long as it doesn't interfere with wikipedia.

2296: 2266: 2168: 2149: 1878: 1800: 1638: 1595: 1546: 1402: 1361: 1346: 1322: 1287: 1257: 1215: 1175: 1092: 1015: 935: 895: 857: 799: 763: 723: 687: 663: 656:

situation? Also, if there's a way to send private messages on Knowledge (XXG), let me know.

618: 538: 422: 371: 325: 265: 214: 175: 135: 86: 2356: 2227: 2219: 1587: 1365: 1055: 871: 683: 1990:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1623: 1622:

the largest natural explosion in recent history...True? I figured you'd be the one to know.

1480: 993: 407: 242: 2359:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2352: 2230:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2223: 2045: 2029: 2001: 1991: 1984: 1973: 1448: 875: 837: 345: 131: 39: 2005: 1928:

other editors when they have simply disagreed with you, as I have. So that is the pattern.

1826: 1733: 1710: 1401:

what Stolper keeps putting in place. Fortunately, other editors are savvy and remove it.

1377: 1148: 968: 952: 746: 652: 468: 316:

since it was unlocked. Dreadstar, you statements refusing to accept the existence of the

62: 52: 35: 526: 367: 321: 164: 1231: 349: 296: 121: 31: 1960:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

1256:

The article reads like a technical service manual, rather than an encyclopedia entry.

1114: 444: 2188: 1994:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

1776: 1369: 1134: 879: 842: 708: 452: 438: 257: 199: 156: 130:

That account is a transparent sock of an indefinitely banned user. I've noted it on

1451:. Unless I'm working too fast (dang caffeine!!!) and beating you to the punch... - 2145: 1796: 1530: 870:

That is fine as your opinion, but the POLICY here clearly states the opposite, via

812:

Also users can delete warnings from their user talk pages if they want, as seen at

2326: 1091:

Not yet, but since I won't be editing much for a while, it may not be necessary.

1473: 396: 56: 1953: 320:

on What the Bleep have approached the point where I feel justified in invoking

2062:

article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the

1727: 1704: 742: 464: 1368:, and I have noted the new article restriction imposed on editor TStolper by 1912: 2385: 2304: 2274: 2251: 2196: 2153: 2013: 1904: 1886: 1866: 1838: 1804: 1784: 1756: 1742: 1719: 1688: 1670: 1646: 1631: 1603: 1580: 1554: 1536: 1488: 1462: 1437: 1410: 1385: 1354: 1330: 1311: 1295: 1279: 1265: 1250: 1223: 1204: 1183: 1167: 1142: 1100: 1085: 1044: 1023: 1007: 980: 943: 928: 903: 887: 865: 850: 823: 807: 792: 771: 750: 731: 716: 695: 675: 641: 626: 604: 546: 519: 472: 430: 414: 379: 359: 333: 306: 273: 246: 222: 207: 183: 143: 124: 94: 2164: 1122: 1108: 288:

to have the article protected again? Stop the revert warring. There is

2363:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2024: 2218:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

1342: 1822: 1811: 171: 1819:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force

111:

Please place new messages at the bottom of the page or use the + tab

1767:

W.r.t. the requested block, I'd like to suggest that you look at

1586:

Don't worry about it too much - just write articles that respect

1919: 2366:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

194:

Please note that you are cited in an arbitration request. See

65:- this is a simple idea. Keep the article brief and on topic. 2028:

Hello Michaelbusch! Thank you for your contributions. I am a

922:. I talked to my adoptee, and I'm sorry it happened. Cheers, 816:. I personally think they shouldn't, but it's a guideline. -- 2040:

of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an

1981:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/United Nation of Islam

1952: 1508:

You have previously expressed an interest in undergoing the

1113: 443: 71:- keep the TM out, make it clear the thing is nonsense, etc. 2171:

of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see

74: 949:

I'm also EXTREMELY sorry for doing that to your userpage.

537:

for putting it back (which you will most likely not get).

45:. Unless he's blocked, need to keep cleaning up the mess. 836:

I reverted your reverts on the talk page of Wikidude57.

2347:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1615: 919: 915: 390: 386: 285: 2120: 1891:

I agree that measurement by albedo is very uncertain.

312:

I am not revert warring - I have reverted the article

1659:

Talk:Kardashev_Scale#Revisions_Feb_19,_and_a_summary.

1241:

you find unclear? After all, I can't read your mind!

1920:

I'm not new, and you need to review the civil policy

1514:

Knowledge (XXG):Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching

814:

Knowledge (XXG):Talk_page_guidelines#User_talk_pages

2134: 1761:A couple of quick responses. Hope to see you back. 1121:An article that you have been involved in editing, 461:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Randell Mills

451:An article that you have been involved in editing, 1821:, I have conducted a Good Article reassessment of 2210:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 874:, which is expressed pretty clearly in the essay 492:Cosmic Connection An Extraterrestrial Perspective 23:This user is no longer active on Knowledge (XXG). 120:For that revert. I'n not sure what's going on. 1131:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Jon Hess 2173:m:Single User Login finalisation announcement 8: 1058:. Have you been matched with a coach yet? 2042:Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person 393:are hardly civil. Please be more careful. 2392: 2000:This is an automatic notification by a 2052:, all biographies should be based on 7: 2336:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 2349:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2333:Hello, Michaelbusch. Voting in the 2293:Knowledge (XXG):Missing Wikipedians 2263:Knowledge (XXG):Missing Wikipedians 1417:College of Chinese Physical Culture 2077:Alessandro Morbidelli (astronomer) 1697:Sorry that you feel you have to go 385:Michaelbusch: Your edit summaries 14: 2236:review the candidates' statements 2034:the unreferenced biographies team 2325: 2023: 1850:Knowledge (XXG):Reliable sources 1501: 80:everything else on my watchlist. 2032:notifying you on behalf of the 1592:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style 2242:. For the Election committee, 2212:Arbitration Committee election 2203:ArbCom elections are now open! 1657:please address my comments in 256:. They are irrelevant to the 1: 2386:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 2252:13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2167:I'm involved in the upcoming 2046:biographies of living persons 1938:20:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC) 1905:16:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 1887:23:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 1867:11:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC) 1854:Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability 1494:Admin coaching request update 1463:17:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1438:17:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1421:Nationwide Network of Classes 1355:18:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 1331:17:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1312:19:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1296:18:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1280:12:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 1266:02:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC) 1251:22:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 944:07:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 929:07:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 904:01:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 888:01:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 866:00:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 851:00:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 824:00:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 808:00:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 793:00:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 772:05:58, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 751:05:43, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 732:01:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 717:21:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 696:18:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 676:14:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 642:15:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 627:20:28, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 605:17:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC) 547:18:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 520:14:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 510:So what do you want to do? -- 473:10:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 431:17:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC) 415:21:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 380:19:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 360:19:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 334:18:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 307:18:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC) 274:22:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 247:22:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 223:20:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 208:19:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 184:18:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 165:12:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC) 144:21:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 125:21:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 2197:17:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC) 1839:15:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1224:18:07, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 1205:01:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC) 1184:23:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1168:22:37, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1143:00:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 1101:18:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 1054:I noticed your name over at 559:Knowledge (XXG):Undue Weight 531:Knowledge (XXG):Undue Weight 2370:and submit your choices on 2291:You have been mentioned at 2275:02:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 2261:You have been mentioned at 2238:and submit your choices on 2154:06:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC) 1974:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1964:. The nominated article is 1775:that you can run yourself. 1679:Please see, response. THX-- 1086:00:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC) 1045:17:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC) 1024:04:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 1008:03:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 981:18:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 2418: 2378:MediaWiki message delivery 2368:the candidates' statements 2244:MediaWiki message delivery 2072:tag. Here is the article: 1970:Knowledge (XXG):Notability 1848:Michaelbusch, please read 1805:15:27, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 1785:17:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC) 1757:20:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1743:07:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1720:07:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 1689:20:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1671:12:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 1647:17:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 1632:03:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 1604:22:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 1581:21:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 1555:18:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 1411:23:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 1386:21:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 254:many worlds interpretation 190:Arbitration on cold fusion 149: 95:06:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 2305:00:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC) 2014:01:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 1987:with four tildes (~~~~). 1610:Tunguska event, uh, again 1537:07:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 1489:06:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1426:Maybe I'm too fast...? - 632:Sure thing, grasshopper-- 490:Carl Sagan's (1973) book 295:for the movie. Period. 69:What the Bleep Do We Know 1882: 1642: 1599: 1550: 1406: 1326: 1291: 1261: 1219: 1179: 1096: 1019: 987:Thanks for your comments 939: 899: 861: 803: 767: 727: 691: 622: 542: 426: 375: 329: 269: 218: 179: 139: 90: 1341:TStolper is filling up 1270:Please visit it again. 2163:Hi Michaelbusch! As a 1966:United Nation of Islam 1957: 1948:United Nation of Islam 1653:revert Kardashev scale 1125:, has been listed for 1118: 934:Don't worry about it. 707:all the best in 2008. 455:, has been listed for 448: 2345:Arbitration Committee 2318:ArbCom Elections 2016 2216:Arbitration Committee 1992:articles for deletion 1956: 1117: 647:Re: Your recent edits 447: 2287:Just to let you know 2257:Just to let you know 2181:Special:MergeAccount 1983:. Please be sure to 1337:TStolper at it again 1193:Talk:Kardashev_scale 1156:Talk:Kardashev_scale 1050:Do you have a coach? 961:P.S. IM unblocked! 615:Talk:Kardashev scale 592:Talk:Kardashev scale 293:scientific consensus 280:Bleep revert warring 38:is persistent and a 2220:arbitration process 1893:But Knowledge (XXG) 1319:Talk:Ferranti Argus 894:This I understand. 2361:arbitration policy 2320:: Voting now open! 2232:arbitration policy 1985:sign your comments 1958: 1817:Hello, as part of 1773:wikibreak enforcer 1771:for a java-script 1614:An anonymous user 1374:citation templates 1119: 1107:AfD nomination of 449: 437:AfD nomination of 262:Talk:Randell Mills 49:Disclosure Project 2195: 2175:). By looking at 2140: 2019:Unreferenced BLPs 1877:of information. 1740: 1717: 1542: 1541: 1518:Coachee checklist 1010: 983: 967:comment added by 959:Join The Brawl!!! 924:Master of Puppets 678: 662:comment added by 358: 305: 2409: 2402: 2397: 2329: 2313: 2283: 2191: 2139: 2138: 2124: 2080: 2071: 2065: 2054:reliable sources 2027: 1874:User talk:Камень 1844:1999 RQ36 answer 1732: 1709: 1533: 1526:WP:Editor review 1505: 1498: 1497: 1461: 1436: 1133:. Thank you. -- 1081: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1066: 1037:GabrielVelasquez 1001: 962: 960: 914:I apologize for 657: 527:reliable sources 463:. Thank you. -- 413: 410: 404: 356: 352: 303: 299: 20: 19: 2417: 2416: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2389: 2373:the voting page 2330: 2322: 2307: 2289: 2277: 2259: 2240:the voting page 2206: 2161: 2081: 2069: 2067:unreferencedBLP 2063: 2021: 1951: 1922: 1846: 1815: 1749:131.215.220.133 1738: 1715: 1699: 1655: 1612: 1566: 1531: 1496: 1477: 1460: 1454:CobaltBlueTony™ 1452: 1445: 1435: 1429:CobaltBlueTony™ 1427: 1424: 1339: 1235: 1152: 1149:Kardashev Scale 1112: 1079: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1067: 1064: 1052: 1032: 989: 958: 912: 834: 783: 704: 653:Kardashev scale 480: 478:Kardashev Scale 442: 408: 397: 394: 354: 301: 282: 231: 192: 152: 118: 113: 108: 63:Kardashev scale 53:Steven M. Greer 36:User:TStolper1W 24: 21: 17: 16: 12: 11: 5: 2415: 2413: 2404: 2403: 2391: 2331: 2324: 2323: 2321: 2315: 2288: 2285: 2258: 2255: 2209: 2205: 2200: 2160: 2159:Global account 2157: 2142: 2141: 2020: 2017: 1950: 1946:nomination of 1941: 1921: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1845: 1842: 1831:GaryColemanFan 1814: 1808: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1765: 1745: 1736: 1713: 1698: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1654: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1620:believed to be 1611: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1558: 1557: 1540: 1539: 1510:Admin coaching 1506: 1495: 1492: 1476: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1456: 1444: 1441: 1431: 1423: 1414: 1389: 1388: 1338: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1299: 1298: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1234: 1232:Ferranti Argus 1228: 1227: 1226: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1195:for request.-- 1151: 1146: 1111: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1051: 1048: 1031: 1028: 1027: 1026: 988: 985: 947: 946: 911: 908: 907: 906: 892: 891: 890: 833: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 782: 779: 777: 775: 774: 759: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 703: 700: 699: 698: 649: 648: 630: 629: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 550: 549: 525:Please review 479: 476: 441: 435: 434: 433: 383: 382: 368:don't be dense 364: 363: 362: 322:don't be dense 281: 278: 277: 276: 230: 227: 226: 225: 191: 188: 187: 186: 151: 148: 147: 146: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 103:Archived talk 101: 99: 82: 81: 78: 72: 66: 60: 46: 40:single-purpose 32:hydrino theory 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2414: 2401: 2396: 2393: 2388: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2374: 2369: 2364: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2341: 2338: 2337: 2328: 2319: 2316: 2314: 2311: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2286: 2284: 2281: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2256: 2254: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2204: 2201: 2199: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2158: 2156: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2137: 2133: 2130: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2112: 2109: 2106: 2103: 2100: 2097: 2094: 2091: 2087: 2084: 2083:Find sources: 2078: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2068: 2061: 2060: 2055: 2051: 2050:verifiability 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2026: 2018: 2016: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1993: 1988: 1986: 1982: 1977: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1955: 1949: 1945: 1942: 1940: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1925: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1875: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1855: 1851: 1843: 1841: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1813: 1809: 1807: 1806: 1802: 1798: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1762: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1744: 1741: 1739: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1718: 1716: 1711: 1707: 1706: 1696: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1681:Sparkygravity 1678: 1677: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1663:Sparkygravity 1660: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1569: 1563: 1561: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1544: 1543: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1493: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1475: 1472: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1459: 1455: 1450: 1442: 1440: 1439: 1434: 1430: 1422: 1418: 1415: 1413: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1399: 1395: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1212: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1197:Sparkygravity 1194: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1160:Sparkygravity 1157: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1116: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1059: 1057: 1049: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1006:was added at 1005: 999: 995: 986: 984: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 957: 954: 950: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 931: 930: 927: 925: 921: 917: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 869: 868: 867: 863: 859: 855: 854: 853: 852: 848: 844: 839: 831: 825: 822: 819: 815: 811: 810: 809: 805: 801: 797: 796: 795: 794: 791: 788: 780: 778: 773: 769: 765: 760: 752: 748: 744: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 729: 725: 721: 720: 719: 718: 714: 710: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 681: 680: 679: 677: 673: 669: 665: 661: 654: 646: 645: 644: 643: 639: 635: 634:Sparkygravity 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 606: 602: 598: 597:Sparkygravity 593: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 560: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 524: 523: 522: 521: 517: 513: 512:Sparkygravity 508: 504: 500: 496: 493: 488: 484: 477: 475: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 453:Randell Mills 446: 440: 439:Randell Mills 436: 432: 428: 424: 419: 418: 417: 416: 411: 405: 403: 401: 392: 388: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 351: 347: 342: 337: 336: 335: 331: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 310: 309: 308: 304: 298: 294: 291: 287: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 258:Randell Mills 255: 251: 250: 249: 248: 244: 240: 239:Dave Fafarman 236: 229:Randell Mills 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 211: 210: 209: 205: 201: 197: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 168: 167: 166: 162: 158: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 128: 127: 126: 123: 115: 110: 106: 102: 100: 97: 96: 92: 88: 79: 76: 73: 70: 67: 64: 61: 58: 54: 50: 47: 44: 41: 37: 33: 30: 29: 28: 2395: 2371: 2365: 2342: 2334: 2332: 2297:Ottawahitech 2290: 2267:Ottawahitech 2260: 2207: 2177:your account 2162: 2143: 2131: 2125: 2117: 2110: 2104: 2098: 2092: 2082: 2057: 2037: 2022: 1998:Please note: 1997: 1996: 1989: 1978: 1959: 1930:76.14.42.191 1926: 1923: 1892: 1879:Michaelbusch 1847: 1816: 1793: 1772: 1769:WP:SELFBLOCK 1731: 1726: 1708: 1703: 1700: 1656: 1639:Michaelbusch 1619: 1613: 1596:Michaelbusch 1570: 1567: 1559: 1547:Michaelbusch 1529: 1478: 1474:Jane Daniel 1446: 1425: 1403:Michaelbusch 1397: 1390: 1362:Michaelbusch 1347:JohnAspinall 1340: 1323:Michaelbusch 1300: 1288:Michaelbusch 1258:Michaelbusch 1238: 1236: 1216:Michaelbusch 1176:Michaelbusch 1153: 1120: 1093:Michaelbusch 1062: 1061: 1060: 1053: 1033: 1016:Michaelbusch 990: 951: 948: 936:Michaelbusch 913: 896:Michaelbusch 858:Michaelbusch 835: 800:Michaelbusch 784: 776: 764:Michaelbusch 724:Michaelbusch 705: 688:Michaelbusch 664:ExarPalantas 650: 631: 619:Michaelbusch 539:Michaelbusch 509: 505: 501: 497: 491: 489: 485: 481: 450: 423:Michaelbusch 399: 398: 384: 372:Michaelbusch 344:it violates 340: 326:Michaelbusch 313: 289: 283: 266:Michaelbusch 234: 232: 215:Michaelbusch 193: 176:Michaelbusch 153: 136:Michaelbusch 119: 98: 87:Michaelbusch 83: 59:would do it. 25: 2187:. Cheers, — 2169:unification 2108:free images 1810:GA sweeps: 1624:Someguy1221 1573:Bradboulton 1522:WP:Adoption 1481:Pinus pinea 1286:Still bad. 1002:—Preceding 994:SoilMan2007 963:—Preceding 658:—Preceding 366:Dreadstar, 105:2007 Dec 11 57:Crop circle 2357:topic bans 2228:topic bans 2006:Erwin85Bot 1829:. Thanks, 1443:Warn users 1378:EdJohnston 969:Wikidude57 832:Wikidude57 684:talk pages 2353:site bans 2224:site bans 2185:talk page 2144:Thanks!-- 1913:1999 RQ36 1030:Holy Gold 535:consensus 350:Dreadstar 318:consensus 297:Dreadstar 122:Acalamari 2189:DerHexer 1962:deletion 1777:Ronnotel 1661:Edit 3-- 1590:and the 1564:Confused 1449:speedied 1394:bollocks 1370:MastCell 1135:Cheeser1 1127:deletion 1123:Jon Hess 1109:Jon Hess 977:contribs 965:unsigned 953:Wikidude 910:Sorry... 880:Pharmboy 843:Pharmboy 781:CSD tags 709:TimidGuy 672:contribs 660:unsigned 457:deletion 284:Are you 200:Pcarbonn 157:TimidGuy 150:'Theory" 2308:please 2278:please 2165:Steward 2146:DASHBot 2114:WP refs 2102:scholar 1797:Kheider 1588:WP:NPOV 1532:MBisanz 1366:WP:COIN 1343:Hydrino 1230:Tag on 1056:WP:ADCO 1004:comment 872:WP:TALK 821:Greiner 818:Michael 790:Greiner 787:Michael 595:soon.-- 286:pushing 18:Retired 2214:. The 2193:(Talk) 2086:Google 2044:. The 1897:Камень 1859:Камень 1823:3 Juno 1812:3 Juno 1360:Hello 876:WP:DRC 838:WP:DRC 346:WP:NOR 172:theory 132:WP:AIV 116:Thanks 43:vandal 2129:JSTOR 2090:books 2036:that 1972:and " 1728:Ckatz 1705:Ckatz 1616:added 1304:Maury 1272:Maury 1243:Maury 743:Dseer 702:Bleep 465:BJBot 402:levse 235:quite 2382:talk 2343:The 2310:ping 2301:talk 2280:ping 2271:talk 2248:talk 2150:talk 2122:FENS 2096:news 2010:talk 1976:"). 1934:talk 1901:talk 1883:talk 1872:See 1863:talk 1852:and 1835:talk 1827:here 1801:talk 1781:talk 1753:talk 1685:talk 1667:talk 1643:talk 1628:talk 1600:talk 1577:talk 1551:talk 1485:talk 1458:talk 1433:talk 1419:and 1407:talk 1382:talk 1351:talk 1327:talk 1317:See 1308:talk 1292:talk 1276:talk 1262:talk 1247:talk 1239:what 1220:talk 1201:talk 1180:talk 1164:talk 1139:talk 1097:talk 1068:e Tr 1041:talk 1020:talk 998:talk 973:talk 940:talk 920:this 918:and 916:this 900:talk 884:talk 862:talk 847:talk 804:talk 768:talk 747:talk 728:talk 713:talk 692:talk 668:talk 638:talk 623:talk 601:talk 543:talk 529:and 516:talk 469:talk 427:talk 409:Talk 391:here 389:and 387:here 376:talk 341:that 330:talk 314:once 270:talk 243:talk 219:talk 204:talk 196:here 180:talk 161:talk 140:talk 91:talk 51:and 2208:Hi, 2136:TWL 2059:698 2030:bot 2002:bot 1944:AfD 1737:spy 1714:spy 1524:or 1398:any 1080:ist 1077:man 1071:ans 1000:) 2384:) 2376:. 2355:, 2312:me 2303:) 2295:. 2282:me 2273:) 2265:. 2250:) 2226:, 2152:) 2116:) 2079:- 2070:}} 2064:{{ 2012:) 1936:) 1903:) 1885:) 1865:) 1837:) 1803:) 1783:) 1755:) 1702:-- 1687:) 1669:) 1645:) 1630:) 1602:) 1594:. 1579:) 1571:-- 1553:) 1520:; 1487:) 1409:) 1384:) 1376:. 1353:) 1329:) 1321:. 1310:) 1294:) 1278:) 1264:) 1249:) 1222:) 1203:) 1182:) 1166:) 1141:) 1099:) 1074:hu 1065:Th 1043:) 1022:) 979:) 975:• 956:57 942:) 902:) 886:) 864:) 849:) 806:) 770:) 749:) 730:) 715:) 694:) 674:) 670:• 640:) 625:) 617:. 603:) 545:) 518:) 471:) 429:) 412:• 406:• 395:— 378:) 370:. 332:) 290:no 272:) 264:. 245:) 221:) 206:) 198:. 182:) 163:) 142:) 134:. 93:) 75:TM 34:- 2380:( 2299:( 2269:( 2246:( 2148:( 2132:· 2126:· 2118:· 2111:· 2105:· 2099:· 2093:· 2088:( 2038:1 2008:( 1932:( 1899:( 1881:( 1861:( 1833:( 1799:( 1779:( 1751:( 1683:( 1665:( 1641:( 1626:( 1598:( 1575:( 1549:( 1483:( 1405:( 1380:( 1349:( 1325:( 1306:( 1290:( 1274:( 1260:( 1245:( 1218:( 1199:( 1178:( 1162:( 1137:( 1095:( 1039:( 1018:( 996:( 971:( 938:( 898:( 882:( 860:( 845:( 802:( 766:( 745:( 726:( 711:( 690:( 666:( 636:( 621:( 599:( 541:( 514:( 467:( 425:( 400:R 374:( 355:† 328:( 302:† 268:( 241:( 217:( 202:( 178:( 159:( 138:( 89:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index