User talk:MidnightRequestLine

3186:

so on. I don't think a hat is censoring; it is simply removing distracting material from a conversation, and you should feel free to do the same if you're in a similar situation. If someone reverts you, well, then you normally don't fight it; I wasn't going to re-revert you, but if another editor steps in and says "that was a good idea", then you should drop the stick. I don't think I reverted many talk page comments, I only remember reverting 1. I really hope you will learn a lesson from this, however - the RM is an absolute mess, and you have people who are ON YOUR SIDE !voting oppose, because they just want their Deadmau5 back. It would have been much better to work carefully behind the scenes, try to edit the policy to allow exceptions in cases like this one, put together a good case, and then move the article back. There's no time limit, and move wars like this can drag on for years - but you're better off with a solid victory than something else. As it is, I have no idea who will close that mess, but they may find "no consensus", which would be the worst of all worlds for you. So, again, take this as a learning experience. It is just one letter, and by being too eager, you may have killed your chances. But maybe not.--

3146:. My edits are within the realm of things editors are allowed to do - admins don't have special permission to hat conversations that are distracting, anyone can do so. As you can see, your change has already been reverted by another editor. Hatting a conversation does not edit comments, it just closes them off since a vote tally in such a confusing RM is bound to lead to more confusion, as you yourself identified. Please just consider your goal - which is to rename to Deadmau5. The tally is only confusing things towards that goal, so I'd encourage you to let the hat stand. A tally can be useful, but only rarely, and the closing admin will perform their own tally; in any case, it's not a vote, so numbers don't really matter that much - it's strength of argument based on policy. If you really want to do a tally, do so on your own page for example, and point people to it - but the nature of these things is quite confusing especially in an RM like this, and sticking the tally in the middle of a dynamic conversation that is going in 20 direction is likely to only lead to more confusion. Best regards, -- 603:

asking the filing editor for more details to make this easier on volunteers and others who may wish to participate as uninvolded editors. While we do wish that your opening be short, we don't wish it to be at the expense of clarity. "Alcohol" and "inner circle" are simply not enough information to do much with without reading through a great deal. This does look to be a rather complicated dispute, involving much more than just what you have brought up and it will all be discussed if the filing goes forward (and there does not appear to be a reason for it not to at this point). I suggest at least describing what the two issues are (that you bring up) in a brief explanation. If you feel such an explanation will require more characters than we can always allow increase. I will make a note on the DR/N talk page.--

1597:, nevermind exhibit adaptogenic properties. Since stimulants have a very wide use in medicine (ADHD, narcolepsy, obesity), have been demonstrated to be consistently effective in every single person, have a common mechanism of action (monoamine release), share a common chemical structure (substituted amphetamines with phenethylamine core), while adaptogens' largest use is in energy drinks and homeopathy (among other pseudosciences), making a lengthy comparison of the two is downright deceitful! I wouldn't have a huge problem with a sentence or two, but a table is too much, and a whole section is also too much. 1954:

Krugman article, maybe you should focus on passively addressing the issue (for instance, try contributing to the essay on civil POV pushing that you seem to have taken an interest in). But don't contribute to the essay and then return to the Krugman article citing the essay. That would be gaming the system. All you can hope for is that somebody someday comes along and tries to argue your points at the Krugman article, citing the changes you've made to the policies. Of course, that is extremely unlikely, but I see no better way to passively contribute to the article.

2692:

the GH companies since FDA approval in the mid-1990s, many internist endocrinologists do not prescribe it for their deficient adult patients, and a smaller proportion of deficient adults than children receive GH for a combination of reasons. There is nothing wrong with tagging "citation needed" but you might play a more constructive role finding citations rather than removing uncontested uncontroversial content that was written when few articles had citations. Look at the history to see what passed for a GH article before I wrote this one.

2913:

back. I don't get why the IP cares so much, and it has all the signs of a personal experience IMO. But anyway, the reason I said that is not because of the multiple IPs, but because I think he/she has a watch list. My watch list apparently failed me when the IP added the info (for the nth time) on march 4. I only realized a few days ago. The IP reverted me very soon after. Unless the IP manually checks this page 10 times per day, he/she must have a watch list. I can't think of any other way to do that.

1438:

place with let's say 22 hours of darkness in December, then moving sunrise from 12 to 11, doesn't really make any big difference to your average person, especially considering that sunset is then also moved 2 to 1... YOu've still got an overwhelmingly dark day, and no fiddling around with the clock is going to change that. At the equator the sunlight just doesn't change through the year, so changing the clock is completely useless there. Where is the problem?

619:

focus on the inner circle problem. I think a good idea might be for you to ask some questions on that page and then I can answer them. I see this as a good idea because the problem with communication is from your perspective which I don't really understand, and the other potential uninvolved editors probably have a similar perspective, so that way the questions you ask will probably answer their questions as well. In any case, I am adding more to it now.

2545: 72: 1047: 731: 2656:

An internist endocrinologist is not an intern but an endocrinologist who takes care of adults. Few of them want to mess with the time consuming and often fruitless paperwork to get insurance coverage for deficient adult patients, which is exactly why the sentence read as it did. Next time i will try harder to leave a comment, but you should ask next time before making edits on topics you know little about. Thanks.

3777: 3704: 3631: 325:. Grammatically, it does not make sense. I think we can all agree on that. When you read it, it looks like a typo (and in reality, it is. Either the source recorded it incorrectly or the person made an error in speech). So, to make it more convenient for the reader, we should put the word in there to help them understand. It isn't changing the quote or deviating from the source because of the use of . 970: 209: 2729:"Endocrinologists are doctors too." Yes, perhaps we might reach consensus. And please go ahead and go through any article you want and delete every unsourced sentence. You might start with today's featured article, which seems to have no citations at all in the entire first paragraphs. Clearly, you are making wikipedia better and I will get out of your way. 2842:

stimulants and had a wide range of medical uses. In reality, it has never been shown to treat anything under the sun and is not used by medical professionals in any way; it's most widespread usage is in energy drinks. And in reality, stimulants are highly effective at what they do and are used to treat several medical conditions, despite their side effects.

3112: 23: 1940:

banned. Also, nobody's going to want to follow the "fill in the fact, fill in the guideline" format you've set out, so I suggest you give that up. Even though it makes a lot of sense in your head (trust me, I've been there), it doesn't seem as perfect to others (including myself) and they don't have the motivation to fill in your blanks.

1466:

material for now. However, I still would like to see a source there, not because I think you're wrong, but because wikipedia needs to have sources! Additionally, it should be cited so that the next person who comes along won't have a problem with it either and will be able to check out the source that supports the material.

2031:. I see no problem with him contributing to that essay. I advise him to do so if he cannot stop editing. I think that editing that essay is obviously a better outlet than to continue editing the Krugman article, which will without a doubt result in a full ban / block. He can hope that his contributions to the 3166:

start a whole thing about it though. I'll let it stand, but as I said, I would rather see you leave a comment yourself warning editors not to be distracted by the tally and pointing out its flaws than censoring it all together. I looked the other way the first few times you did it and when you reverted

2841:

I used that source to show that that plant was used in energy drinks. Using the other sources, I wrote the other material to balance NPOV because the article, citing dubious sources from 1980s Soviet Russia and other Communist nations, was promoting the plant, claiming that it was more effective than

618:

Okay, I'm not trying to be rude, but I really just don't understand what the problem is. I made a section called "The Objection". In it, I gave the full quotes and larger explanations for the problem. The alcohol issue is actually (for the time being) resolved, so I am going to edit that in so we can

3200:

I did drop the stick, so I'm not sure why you are still acting as if I haven't. And I think this current RM could not be more successful in fact, given the circumstances. I really didn't intend for this to happen, but there could not have been a quicker way to move this page's title back to Deadmau5

3185:

It is perfectly acceptable to completely revert a talk page comment that is fully off-topic. People do it all the time. In that one case I reverted, you were making a statement that had nothing to do with the trademark policy, and everything to do with what should be done about the Deadmau5 move and

3170:

comments (reverting article edits is one thing, but talk page comments?), but I think you're too quick to take things like that into your own hands, since you're not an admin. Anyway, I'm not angry or anything, and I hope I don't come across that way but I probably will considering the heated nature

3082:

I was just pointing out that he's an admin, and they don't appoint people to be admins if they're poor editors. Whatever though, let's call it even. I don't really care about that page much anymore, but I don't want to see it go back to where it was. I hope you understand that the page should have a

1925:

Okay, so it seems that your main complaint is that they aren't making arguments about the content, they are only dismissing your arguments, saying things like "we have already spelled it out for you", "there is no consensus for your changes", etc. I don't think you are going to win that conversation

1494:

I've put in a couple of citations, and refined the language a bit. They aren't perfect, but I think are suitable. One discusses the problems of Alaska given their northern location and DST, which I think is good enough to extrapolate from. There are lots of sites discussing this on the internet, but

1437:

hey, I'm curious if you could explain your objection to the assertion that "DST makes little practical difference" at extremely southern/northern latitudes. It could help me to find an appropriate source, and or reword it to address your problem. From my perspective the issues is that if you're in a

413:

There's nothing about a modern source using a phrase that doesn't make it old fashioned. That actually happens all the time. In fact, if it didn't, no phrases would be considered old fashioned! They would simply be unknown and/or unused. You said it's a Shakespeare quote - that's exactly my point! I

130:

Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. I have some user names on my watchlist and I've seen a couple places of discussion where you've posted. I see that you're frustrated with Knowledge right now. That's understandable. It can be very difficult to get started. Don't worry though. If you are determined to

2927:

I didn't know whether an anonymous IP can set up a watch list. It seems odd for someone to be doing that with a sock, two computers side-by-side? I looked around a bit to see if the person might be referring to one of the other documents cited on the page rather than the one repeatedly referred to,

2912:

Thank you for your concern. I agree the situation is quite odd. Take a look at that page's edit history. You'll see that this person has been trying to add this info for several months now and I've been trying to prevent it. At one point, I put in a RFPP, but that only lasted a week and the IP came

2691:

Thanks for the response but you still dont quite get it. Internist endocrinologists are "endocrinologists in general" for adults. The principal prescribers of GH in the US and Europe are pediatric endocrinologists, endocrinologists who take care of deficient children. Despite intensive marketing by

2655:

I tried to redo the reversion with an explanation and it hung last night. Sorry, but i reverted because you corrected something your comment showed you didnt understand. May i respectfully suggest you ask at the talk page before doing so. Save yourself some embarrassment or perhaps learn something.

3258:

That is what we have user talk pages for and that is where a "Dear editor" comment belongs, not on the article talk page. However, it is appropriate to have a section heading that says something like "Article length" and follow it with, "Is it really appropriate to cut the article length in half",

3165:

touch other people's comments. Yes, you did not edit the content, and I did not mean to suggest that you did, but you hid them. Sure, it may be technically legal, but I do not think it is polite or wise to do because it is counterproductive to keeping everybody civil and cooperative. I'm not gonna

2269:

Again, instead of ploughing on and implementing edits that have already been reverted, please explain why you believe they are correct on the talk page. The cites you have added are incorrect, and don't even say what you claim. The first doesn't even mention "brostep". In fact it starts right

1980:

Charles35, Deicas has been indefinitely topic-banned from discussing Paul Krugman anywhere on Knowledge. Advising Deicas to continue dealing with Krugman anywhere on Knowledge (you wrote "If you must continue contributing to the Krugman article...") is a bad idea what will probably only result in

647:

You seem to be going out of your way to comply to the many different volunteers making demands, but you need not do any trimming unless you feel so inclined, as I have already asked for the expansion. The other volunteers simply were attempting to stick to the set parameters of our guidelines, but

602:

While on its face this seems fine, my only concern is that you have labeled these issues and not explained what they are about. At this point I am almost inclined to close the case as not having sufficient information for issues far more complicated. I wont, of course because it is easily fixed by

2676:

endocrinologists. Regular endocrinologists could make the same decisions. This is why I removed "internist" but left "endocrinologists" - this way it covers both. And I left a citation needed tag. If you have a source or a really good reason for specifying internist endocrinologists as opposed to

1327:

Charles: I am disappointed that you have not yet responded to the above, even to say "thanks but no thanks" for example. I am unable to guess why considering that you have since made contributions to the encyclopaedia. If I have offended you in any way, please do let me know although I assure you

569:

This is what you wrote in the Dispute Review: "There are many issues currently being debated about the article, but I'd like to focus on 2. For convenience, I like to call them "alcohol" and "inner circle". These issues involve two pieces of material in the article "Breast cancer awareness". Both

546:

I added the full text. I trimmed it down because it seemed like they want short comments (2000 char). But anyway it's up there now. What exactly do you mean when you say it's more complicated? Again, I was trying to be brief so I just gave an outline. I figured the ins and outs of the issue would

2886:

Hi, just wanted to warn you that although I'm sure your intentions are good, it is dangerous to throw around accusations that editors may be running sock puppets. It is considered a serious offence to accuse someone of that activity without very serious proof, and I've recently witnessed a quite

1360:

Honestly I have never heard of any of those people. I don't think I'm the right person to be constructing those articles. Thanks for providing all of this information. I will hold onto this and might do something with it one day, but for now, I don't think it's a project I should try to take on.

1014:. In good faith, an editor has taken what might be considered an easy approach to this change. However, this has removed some of your and my edits from the article. I will fix mine if you fix yours? Sorry about this but, I feel, it is for the long term good. List of edits that need restoring ... 1939:

I would suggest that you focus on their arguments themselves and try to prove them wrong (even if no one is arguing against you), but that might be equally futile. I doubt that any of them will ever be receptive of your words, no matter what you say, evidenced by the fact that you've been topic

1465:

Now, I am not an expert either. In fact, this topic confuses me quite a bit. I had some reasons for why I thought the material might be wrong, but now that I am trying to articulate them, they don't feel right. On second thought, your reasoning does make sense to me. I am going to reinstate the

670:

Okay. It just made me worried that the section would be closed. (S)he just said trim it down, or we're closing it. End of story. That's how it seemed anyway. I just don't want it to be closed, obviously. I probably don't have a correct understanding of the way everything works around here. I am

3297:

I hear you there! Way, way too many. That one though is just there to keep the discussion on topic and not get into any name calling. It is a fundamental principle of all forms of decision making (other than dictatorial), so I guess I could have said all forms of collaborative decision making.

1953:

Whether you are right or wrong, I think you should give this up. It's only going to bring you more unpleasantness and make others more bitter towards you, which might result in you being banned altogether or even blocked. May I ask why you care so much? If you must continue contributing to the

3545:

Sometimes I get an email message that says no more messages will be sent until I log in again. I think it must mean go back to my constantly logged-in browser and take some action, but I don't even know if that message is consistent. I can only guess whether comparing updates would count as

3716:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3395:

The admins are very unresponsive. I was just going to make a de facto move because it seems like everyone is wondering why an admin hasn't done anything yet. I figured why not just do it ourselves you know? Especially because I doubt anyone will contest the move if I were to just do it.

3789:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2343:

I have replied there. Please revert and read previous discussion about these cites. I'm trying to help you here, and it helps if everyone reaches consensus about a change. Implementing it first, despite requests not to, and then asking to discuss it, is the wrong way around.

359:

Yeah I did check it, sorry. I'm not sure why I wrote that. Yes, it does technically make sense in an old-fashioned, obsolete phrase-turned-colloquialism sort of way. But when you, and your present day reader, read it, it sounds like a typo. Putting does not affect integrity.

3122:

regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is

223:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

1453:

Hi there. I understand that this is "your perspective the issue". Information on wikipedia cannot be solely based on the perspectives of editors. However, I am not a huge stickler for original research that I believe is in good faith and I usually let things slide

50:

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.

2671:

While I do admit that I had confused internal medicine with an intern, that has no effect on this edit. The material was not sourced, so it was fair game. I removed the material because it sounded like original research. There was no justification for specifying

925:, but be very sure that you can make your case. ANI is the most ruthless noticeboard at Knowledge, and you will be taken to task if others believe that what you think is an editor problem is in fact a content problem. Worse still, if other editors think that 1019:→‎Media: lung cancer and expert were missing from the source (OR). lung cancer removed because women's magazines naturally have female-specific material. expert claim removed because it is simply unsubstantiated. tag removed & appropriate page #s added 3643:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

2718:

good reason. I'm not taking your word for it. Poor wikipedia practices of the past do not justify this and it is fallacious to argue that because other sentences in the article are unsourced, it makes no sense to pick out this one. That sets a poor

299: 1559:

when I fell across the book at my library. In his book, Fulder reviews the thousand or so studies from Russia, and also describes his own London experiments using mice.) When I have reviewed the book, I will respond to your questions over at

1589:. They might display one or two here and there, but they do not fully fit into this idea of an adaptogen. They share no common mechanism of action or chemical structure. There might be a bunch of studies from Soviet Russia, but none of the 790:

at the DRN. I've tried to shame it according to my off-hand recall of a formal RFC (neutral summary followed by space for opinions from all interested editors). I would suggest adding your reasoning below the line. I've also left a

929:

are the problem. Don't get overly frustrated, though, and violate policy yourself. It's simply not worth it. Walk away, take a breath, edit something else. You have to have perspective on these things; otherwise, you'll burn out.

2845:

However, I do not object to your changes because you simply removed the entire section. I have always been against that section and I would have rather seen it gone than have it stay, even with the material I added. Thanks.

2928:

but I can't see any such information there either. I guess that we and perhaps others now have that page on our watch lists and will be waiting to see what happens! Knowledge is amusing in some bizarre ways. Best wishes,

1039:→‎Environmental breast cancer movement: tag was added 18 days ago and has not yet been verified. if you think the sentence is verifiable, please revert and discuss on talk page section "king and precautionary principle" 3282:

Okay sorry. You know this isn't even a dispute or anything. There is no conflict. I was just trying to call his attention. It's not a huge deal. But I won't do that next time. There are a lot of rules around here....

743:

i came across your handling of the earnest essay by Hartley1000 in The Wire and your defense of his effort, anxiety that it not be labeled vandalism, and offer of help to him. Nicely done sir. You are a class act.

2897:. Anyway, I (and User:Hamamelis) entirely agree with you, and I've no idea where that anon gets the idea from that the herb is mentioned in the article! Perhaps they'll eventually explain themselves. Best wishes, 146:

And since things are a bit stressful at the moment, perhaps you should consider a break for a day or three, then maybe you'll return refreshed, energized, and motivated to get over the learning curve. After all,

3586:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3817: 3744: 3671: 1606:

chemicals are adaptogens because the list is potentially endless. However, if you give me an herb, I will show you why it isn't an adaptogen (ie I will give you a source). Seriously, name me one adaptogen.

1583:

between the two. This is totally wrong. It's not like adaptogens are "everything stimulants aren't plus more!" "Adaptogen" is just a concept. No actual real-world substances display "adaptogenic" propertie

637:

You weren't rude. Asking questions etc, is after the opening of the case, once we begin. I wanted a better description of the conflict as the original labels didn't mean much to someone unfamiliar to the

3801:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3728:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3655:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1579:

I don't necessarily object to the idea of comparing stimulants and adaptogens. But I think that creating a table with "yes" and "no" (which is very incomplete and misleading by the way) creates a

1718:

on the "glass is a liquid" issue that caused the edit war leading to protection status. Your comments would be appreciated, so that we can build a consensus and avoid further edit warring.

1495:

not many that could really be considered "reliable" by WP standards, so I hope this satisfies you? If not, let me know and I can see what I can find, but I have no doubt that this is true.

2968:

Thanks so much. I wrote out a very thorough one with several links to diffs late the other night and somehow it didn't go through so I just gave up on it for the time being. Thanks again.

414:

mean it's not a huge deal. I realize that it is indeed a real phrase and is used relatively often. I just think that adding won't hurt, especially because it's awkward when you read it (

2401:

and that number of votes is not a substitute for discussion, but the consensus looks like its 30-1 in favor of considering him brostep. A large number of editors have weighed in on it.

1480:

OK, fair enough. I'm not an expert in any formal way, although I think I have a reasonable understanding of the topic from various readings of done. I'll see what I can find next week.

528:

you provided only partial sentences that make it very difficult to understand the issue with the source and the contribution. Please provide diffs to the edits or provide full quotes.--

2482:

I'm talking about the large number of editors that have weighed in on the issue over the course of that talk page. Many of them are IPs. There are at least 4-5 sections about brostep.

2201:

I understand that you're angry, but keep your emotions in check. Nothing good will come of this. At the end of the day, you will still be topic banned. Don't turn it into a full ban.

1151:

with a view to submitting it to DYK, consider creating it in your user-space first—so you don't inadvertently break the five-days-old rule—and do ask me for advice if you need it --

1462:

be inaccurate. To me, the fact that you said "from my perspective" tells me that you're not 100% sure and that you aren't an expert, which makes me more reluctant to let it slide.

1857:

at Paul Krugman and have now been topic banned. I'll appeal the ban and see what happens. I'll be interested to see what happens when disinterested observers look at the issue.

1574:

Why not talk about this on the talk page so that other editors can weigh in? Don't you find it odd that all of these sources come from Soviet Russia? Doesn't that say something?

131:

learn the "rules and norms" here and stick to them, then you'll fit right in. If you want to vent or ask me a question or three at my talk page, please feel free. Best wishes.

2415:

What "large number"? There's two of you. And if you are aware of Knowledge policy you'll know that individual editor's opinions are totally irrelevant. What matter is what

2289:

The first one wasn't supposed to be there. Could you give me a break and maybe help out? The editing process confuses me a bit and I'm trying to do it as fast as I can.

3263:

policy directs us to focus on content, not on contributors. If we need to focus on the contributor, the places to do that are their talk page and all of the flavors of

1411:

information. If you have any ideas on how to better structure, categorize, etc the material that I recently added, or just improve it in any way, please implement it.

2593:

Sorry, I've been very busy lately! Thanks for your response! I took a look at it, but I didn't want to give a reply until I could spend the time to thoroughly do so.

1633:. Your ideas are interesting, but you really need to find references to support them. There is a short list in the article of four crude drugs that are adaptogens. 1142: 2893:

could easily have resulted from one person who hasn't made a signon (which is perfectly permitted) who has restarted their computer and been allocated a different

2562: 89: 340:

Did you check the link I provided? There is nothing to say it was recorded incorrectly or an error in speech. It's an actual phrase...even if not widely used. --

3531:

I would be reverting too but my watchlist thing seems to be really spotty. I didn't get an email about that page being edited. Do you know why that might be?

3517:

Good to see you so confident (some of the malevolent vandals like to cite 3RR, and I've even seen them backed up by admins). Oh well, on with the battle ...

2887:

horrible situation where an admin lost their temper over such an allegation that was made entirely innocently. The fact that two IP addresses were used on

1663: 3252:

Please also note that this is a pretty extreme example of personalizing a discussion: "(editor) just cut this article in half! (as a section heading)

1673: 3449:

to overturn another horrible move based on a name no reliable sources refer to the subject as. I am just trying to get consensus to move it back to

3124: 3119: 1659: 2995: 1926:

right there. Multiple editors seem fed up with the issue and feel worn out arguing with you. I don't think that is an effective way to fight them.

1775: 3230: 1669: 1136: 913:

You have to decide what you think is the main problem. For example, if you think that the editing is not neutral, you could start a topic at

78: 71: 3831: 3758: 3685: 3611: 1248: 2714:

Endocrinologists are doctors too. They work with children and adults. Don't tell me what I do and don't get unless you have a source or a

3385: 3354: 2894: 750: 1715: 1708: 3410:

I'd recommend to wait the seven days RMs take, if nothing extraordinary happens, it will be moved back to the "5" style even before.

842:

Amadscientist, I'm not exactly sure what you mean. Was that directed towards WLU? Was the message basically that his RfC is nill?

547:

come out when/if a discussion started. This is the 1st time I've ever posted on the DRN What other info do you suggest I provide?

110:

Did I miss something over there? I see that most of that discussion is gone... I'm not sure if I saw this notification in time...

41: 710: 47: 46: 40: 1879:

starting at timestamp "19:32, 20 January 2013 (UTC)". I'm interested to hear what you think of my reasoning and argumentation.

1866:

In the interim I thought I would attempt to contribute something to WP:CRUSH with what I've learned. Would that be of interest?

302:

Commonly used? Not really...but please don't revert again unless you have a source that disputes what the quote actually was. --

3827: 3754: 3681: 3607: 3445:

I noticed you participated in the Deadmau5/Deadmaus RM and I was wondering if you were willing to leave your two cents here at

2722:

BTW, I didn't thoughtlessly delete that word. I gave it a google search. Couldn't find anything. If you're so sure about this,

2511:

I will respond to the other stuff at the talk page. Please keep the conversation over there so that everything's in one place.

1003: 570:

pieces of material are cited. The objections state that the material violates wikipedia policies including but not limited to:

2419:

say. Once you have a source as good as Billboard we can start a proper discussion. As it is, of the cites you've suggested;

1901:

Write some paragraphs about your experience on the talk page and we'll see if there's anything we'd like to add to the essay.

1666:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2035:

essay might somehow passively result in an improvement at the Krugman page. Obviously, this is extremely unlikely, but if he

392: 148: 2429:

The second is actually criticising those who insist on claim he's "brostep". So the exact opposite of what you are saying.

1112: 703:

your userpage to here. You can also change your default signature so that it doesn't link to your userpage at all... see

648:

DR/N is an informal process and we do ask for editors to go past a limit if we feel it will further explain the dispute.--

824:

I changed that to a straw poll as RFC is a different venue and should not be done on the DR/N. One or the other please.--

3810: 3737: 3664: 1818: 1751: 1257: 1011: 344: 306: 3598:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3822: 3749: 3676: 3603: 243: 3060:

are just "a part of the community like other editors, with no special powers or privileges when acting as editors."

3464: 3143:

I did *not* edit anyone's comments; if anything, by reverting me, you deleted my comment (in addition to the hat).

2889: 1240: 2994:

Hello, Being an editor apart of the Game of Thrones series, can you please come and join the discussion over on

2215:

In fact, if you exhibit good behavior over this, and let a considerable period of time pass, you can apply to be

803: 2309:

Adding a citation to support a change after you requested such a citation is "ploughing on"? Kids these days...

1173: 3532: 3504: 3397: 3366: 3321: 3284: 3206: 3172: 3088: 3043: 2969: 2914: 2847: 2805:

A quick FYI. I removed your additions of oxyfresh.com as a source and the corresponding material. It is not a

3231:

Talk:Deadmau5 Circa 1998–2002#Note to any editors trying to bring the word "Deadmaus" to this article's title

2578: 1650:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3551: 3522: 3489: 2947: 2933: 2902: 2631:

Hey thanks! Prop was a good guy all things considered. Sad news though - he died on Jan. 17. The real prop,

2585: 2551: 2544: 1771: 1007: 978: 861: 829: 653: 608: 533: 514: 3191: 3151: 3065: 3032: 3007: 1500: 1485: 1443: 1337: 1333: 1098: 767: 239: 100: 2791: 2764: 2682: 2640: 2598: 2516: 2406: 2372: 2334: 2314: 2294: 2224: 2206: 2069: 1959: 1906: 1840: 1612: 1526: 1471: 1416: 1366: 1078: 847: 676: 624: 552: 480: 423: 365: 330: 284: 115: 3798: 3725: 3652: 3481: 3459: 1555:

and stimulants. However, I need to check out the book again from my local library. (I got interested in

1329: 1277: 1206: 1147: 1117: 3171:

of this debate. Thank you though for your efforts and for being involved in the whole Deadmau5 issue.

3454: 2677:

just endocrinologists in general, I'd be glad to hear it and try to incorporate it into the article.

1806: 443: 269: 188: 180: 170: 156: 136: 31: 2787: 2760: 2678: 2636: 2594: 2512: 2402: 2368: 2330: 2310: 2290: 2220: 2202: 2148: 2065: 1955: 1902: 1836: 1608: 1522: 1467: 1412: 1403:

Also, Senra. I'm sure you saw my recent edits to the BCA article. Honestly I am more experienced in

1362: 1074: 843: 672: 620: 548: 476: 419: 361: 326: 280: 111: 3599: 2734: 2697: 2661: 2027:

with Paul Krugman and related issues. However, Deicas has expressed a lot of interest in the essay

881: 571: 27: 1778:

with my views of the issues. If you think I should continue this analysis, please do let me know.

1073:

Thanks for letting me know. I fixed those edits. Please let me know if you see anything I missed.

3547: 3518: 3485: 3380: 3349: 2943: 2929: 2898: 2573: 2398: 857: 825: 745: 700: 649: 604: 529: 510: 387: 341: 303: 220: 3201:

than by starting an RM for Zimmerman. Yes, it is a dubious bureaucratic loophole, but we've had

917:. If you think the main problem is content, then you have little choice but to use the standard 2257:. A link to another Knowledge article is not a source and cannot be used as such. Thanks. -- 3785: 3712: 3639: 3621: 3575: 3566: 3187: 3147: 3087:

too far. For the sake of the other editors, let's not restart the useless, endless arguments.

3061: 3028: 3000: 2723: 2448: 2345: 2275: 2258: 1876: 1740:

I hope you don't mind. If you do mind, please feel free to delete this post. I was lurking at

1689: 1651: 1496: 1481: 1439: 1181: 1106: 763: 696: 232: 96: 56: 165:

I replied at my talk page. Feel free to keep the conversation going there. I'm here to help.

3794: 3721: 3648: 3595: 3579: 3303: 3272: 2164: 1884: 1814: 1745: 1634: 1565: 1261: 1190: 974: 884:... I don't personally have a preference either way, but just wanted to point out that the 808: 347: 309: 3809:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3736:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3663:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3594:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2062:

Deicas - do not edit the Paul Krugman article or any other article relevant to the dispute.

3423: 3057: 2783: 2621: 2216: 2152: 2107: 2032: 2028: 1990: 1854: 1787: 1723: 1580: 1381: 1346: 1316: 1302: 1290: 1231: 1219: 1157: 1062: 987: 953: 938: 914: 898: 579: 438: 265: 228: 184: 166: 152: 132: 1029:→‎Educated, empowered patients: i don't think a tag is necessary as this is common sense 2782:

Not to mention, the entire paragraph was just deleted by someone else on the grounds of

730: 505:

I am concerned that the dispute you filed is more complicated than is discussed in your

3806: 3733: 3660: 3591: 3583: 3446: 3128: 2869: 2831: 2820: 2810: 2730: 2693: 2657: 2632: 2156: 1630: 1626: 1561: 1265: 1194: 583: 575: 2367:

The 4 links that I listed also support the change. I can cite them all if you want...

1046: 3802: 3729: 3656: 3587: 3500: 3260: 3238: 3225:

It is the AT policy and the naming conventions that covers article titles not the MOS

2861: 2444: 2254: 1680:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

922: 889: 885: 811: 800: 383: 3835: 3762: 3689: 3615: 3555: 3540: 3526: 3512: 3493: 3470: 3428: 3405: 3390: 3374: 3359: 3329: 3307: 3292: 3276: 3242: 3214: 3195: 3180: 3155: 3133: 3096: 3069: 3051: 3036: 3017: 2977: 2951: 2937: 2922: 2906: 2873: 2855: 2835: 2795: 2768: 2738: 2701: 2686: 2665: 2644: 2625: 2602: 2587: 2558: 2520: 2453: 2435:

The fourth only mentions brostep in the headline, and not in connection to Skrillex.

2410: 2376: 2350: 2338: 2318: 2298: 2280: 2263: 2228: 2210: 2168: 2115: 2073: 1998: 1963: 1910: 1888: 1844: 1792: 1727: 1693: 1637: 1616: 1568: 1530: 1504: 1489: 1475: 1447: 1420: 1386: 1370: 1351: 1321: 1162: 1082: 1067: 992: 957: 942: 903: 865: 851: 833: 818: 771: 754: 716: 680: 657: 628: 612: 556: 537: 518: 509:. Please consider expanding that a bit to clarify the dispute explanation further.-- 484: 450: 427: 396: 369: 350: 334: 312: 288: 273: 247: 192: 174: 160: 140: 119: 104: 85: 60: 3411: 3264: 2806: 2416: 1685: 1681: 1102: 918: 587: 231:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{ 52: 3776: 3703: 3630: 2860:

Thanks for the response. Both articles need a lot of work. I've asked for help at

38:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 3259:

directing the discussion to the topic, and not personalizing the discussion. The

3083:

balanced point of view. I usually side with the progressives, but that page went

795:

on the talk page. Please consolidate all discussions of this point over there.

3299: 3268: 2160: 1880: 1810: 1741: 1655: 1458:

I think that it might be inaccurate. In this case, I suspect that that sentence

1189:(1). United States, United Kingdom: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 150–151. 1034:→‎Consequences: no one verified that info in the 8 days since the tag was added 704: 591: 3480:

You might be interested in a request for advice from an admin that I posted at

2397:

Actually, consensus seems to be that he is fake dubstep. I mean, I am aware of

2617: 2447:

regarding your refusal to revert your change and removal of cited content. --

2144: 2100: 1983: 1783: 1719: 1377: 1342: 1312: 1153: 1058: 983: 949: 934: 893: 856:

No, just that we don't make RFCs on other venues, so I made it a straw poll.--

921:

mechanisms. If you think the problem is editor-related, then you could go to

699:, but you don't have anything you want to put in your userpage, you can just 379: 3450: 2865: 2827: 2816: 1556: 1552: 1094: 2432:

The third is more like it, but certainly doesn't trump what Billboard says.

208: 3345: 3234: 3042:

Alright what are they called? Admins? I think it was clear what I meant.

796: 3813:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3740:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3667:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3111: 2329:

I made a section on the talk page. I hope you weigh in over there :)

216: 3118:

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the

2253:

Please revert your change and contribute to the discussion on the

418:

when you read it the first time; hence, I thought it was a typo).

35: 3582:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

2815:. There were also WP:V and WP:SYN problems with the material. -- 252:

Hah, it's okay! Don't worry about it. Thanks for the kitten! :)

3816:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

3743:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

3670:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

3205:

dubious bureaucratic loopholes work against us in this debate.

2998:

re Gendry and his place on the characters that would be great.

2942:

I've submitted a PP request. Now to see if it will be granted.

1328:

that no offence was intended. UPDATE: I have just noticed that

1802:

Per your comments, how might I contact you outside Knowledge?

2864:

for Adaptogen first, which is by far the worse of the two. --

3110: 2565:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2543: 1981:

Deicas violating the topic ban and getting blocked, right?

207: 92:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

70: 1564:. (Should you wish to respond to this, please do so here.) 1101:' can be rewarding. Have you considered this? For example, 203:

Sorry for my over-reaction to your edits. Here is a kitten.

30:

and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should

1135:

harv error: no target: CITEREFManselSweetlandHughes2009 (

3127:". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! 3107:

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

3056:

It doesn't matter if he's an admin or not. Per policy,

2759:

I deleted a single word. It's not the end of the world.

260:

For making a common-sense based-of-the-source edit like

26:

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

3797:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3724:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3651:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3144: 2824: 2813: 2613: 1853:

I have been unsuccessful in my efforts in fighting the

1762: 1756: 1654:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1126: 1122: 1043: 1038: 1033: 1028: 1023: 1018: 792: 787: 382:, which is hardly known as old-fashioned and obsolete. 261: 2550:

Hello, MidnightRequestLine. You have new messages at

1760:. In a sincere effort to be helpful, I took a look at 1521:

I'm satisfied with it. Thanks for taking that effort.

77:

Hello, MidnightRequestLine. You have new messages at

1130: 2635:. He had a heart attack at age 52. Very, very sad. 2151:, via his own talk page, the vigorous campaign of 2023:under any circumstances edit any articles dealing 1831:" and then when the drop down opens up, click on " 3574:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2440:So I'm mystified as to what you think they prove. 1875:If time permits, would you please have a look at 300:There's nothing wrong with it's use in this case. 3482:User_talk:Mark_Arsten#Eleutherococcus_senticosus 3457:. If you have the chance I would appreciate it. 2155:associated with the editing of the biography of 880:Hello Charles35! I noticed your recent edit to 3453:in the same manner Deadmau5 was moved back per 1593:herbs have been demonstrated to effectively do 1012:Talk:Breast_cancer_awareness#Summary_and_action 3503:in cases of blatant and malevolent vandalism. 1646:Disambiguation link notification for January 2 1703:(Note: I'm listing this on the talk pages of 1044:→‎Breast cancer as a brand: See talk page: — 8: 2039:, then this is the most fruitful outlet IMO. 1129:discussion. Uncle G even provided a source ( 1115:) suggests that there is a missing article ( 981:benefit from the addition of Klawiter 2008? 695:If you don't want your name to show up as a 432:Truth’s a dog that must to kennel, you know. 227:Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{ 3783:Hello, MidnightRequestLine. Voting in the 3710:Hello, MidnightRequestLine. Voting in the 3637:Hello, MidnightRequestLine. Voting in the 3027:Knowledge doesn't have any "moderators". 1174:"Memoirs: Joseph Colt Bloodgood 1867–1935" 973:You are invited to join the discussion at 964:Discussion at User talk:Drmies#neutrality 2064:Policy pages are of course not relevant. 1631:Talk:Adaptogen#comparison with stimulants 1264: 1193: 948:I've contacted someone but no promises.-- 3120:Knowledge:Dispute resolution noticeboard 2098:Thanks for the clarification Charles... 1602:I can't (practically) prove to you that 1145:). If you consider creating the article 998:Breast cancer awareness citation changes 79:Francophonie&Androphilie's talk page 3379:Well, you'll need an admin to do that. 2996:Talk:List of Game of Thrones characters 2786:. My edit was effectively meaningless. 2569:Lol I wrote way too much in response. 1332:has been created today. There is still 888:does contain guidance on this issue at 1699:RfC on Glass is a liquid misconception 1298: 1286: 1275: 1227: 1215: 1204: 1141:and some example DYK hook's (see also 524:Also, if you could, under the section 3340:If you were trying to move it back... 1143:Did You Know/Supplementary guidelines 7: 3786:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 3713:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 3640:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 2651:reason for reversion on gh treatment 1249:Canadian Medical Association Journal 279:Thanks Biosthmors, I appreciate it! 2147:: I thank you for demonstrating to 1768:Risks of too much awareness section 1241:"Joseph Colt Bloodgood, B.Sc., M.D" 1131:Mansel, Sweetland & Hughes 2009 762:I agree. That was very gracious. -- 378:daily use. Here, 4 minutes ago, in 317:I'm not disputing the quote, hence 3770:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 3697:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 3320:Okay. Thanks for letting me know! 2443:Please read what I've said on the 1709:Talk:List of common misconceptions 215:UseTheCommandLine has given you a 14: 3600:review the candidates' statements 3775: 3702: 3629: 2060:To make this absolutely clear - 1127:Talk:Breast cancer awareness 2.0 1045: 1006:to change the citation style of 968: 729: 374:It's a Shakespeare quote and in 45: 39: 21: 3820:and submit your choices on the 3747:and submit your choices on the 3447:Talk:Tech Nine#Requested move 2 3348:redirect page must be deleted. 1733:BCA:Risks of too much awareness 1004:Knowledge:AutoWikiBrowser/Tasks 3606:. For the Election committee, 3576:Arbitration Committee election 3567:ArbCom elections are now open! 3556:19:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC) 3541:21:10, 24 September 2013 (UTC) 3527:21:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC) 3513:13:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC) 3494:13:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC) 2882:Socks, need to tread carefully 1827:On the left column, click on " 1: 3836:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 3799:Knowledge arbitration process 3726:Knowledge arbitration process 3690:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 3653:Knowledge arbitration process 3616:16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 3499:Don't worry, you can violate 2823:) 15:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 2603:15:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC) 2588:17:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC) 2559:17:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC) 2319:00:27, 10 February 2013 (UTC) 1547:From memory, the Fulder book 1490:14:54, 29 December 2012 (UTC) 1476:20:19, 28 December 2012 (UTC) 1448:17:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC) 1421:21:26, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 1387:21:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 1371:17:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 1352:17:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 1322:16:39, 28 December 2012 (UTC) 1163:16:00, 28 December 2012 (UTC) 1083:18:11, 26 December 2012 (UTC) 1068:11:03, 26 December 2012 (UTC) 993:11:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC) 958:02:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 943:01:30, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 933:I hope that helps a little.-- 904:21:15, 14 December 2012 (UTC) 866:04:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC) 852:05:38, 14 December 2012 (UTC) 834:05:11, 14 December 2012 (UTC) 819:17:13, 12 December 2012 (UTC) 772:15:02, 12 December 2012 (UTC) 289:04:23, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 274:23:46, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 264:! Keep up that good work. =) 248:01:07, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 181:User_talk:Biosthmors#Hi_there 120:03:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 3763:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 2521:23:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC) 2454:23:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC) 2411:00:33, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2377:00:31, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2351:00:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2339:00:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2299:00:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2281:00:06, 7 February 2013 (UTC) 2264:23:49, 6 February 2013 (UTC) 2229:05:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 2211:04:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 2169:02:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC) 2116:18:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 2074:18:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 1999:17:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 1964:16:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 1911:15:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 1889:06:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC) 1845:04:03, 17 January 2013 (UTC) 1638:07:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 1627:Talk:Adaptogen#fringe theory 1562:Talk:Adaptogen#fringe theory 1270:. Retrieved 28 December 2012 1258:Canadian Medical Association 1199:. Retrieved 28 December 2012 755:23:20, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 717:01:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 712:Francophonie&Androphilie 681:02:33, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 658:21:43, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 629:19:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 613:06:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 557:01:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 538:00:51, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 519:00:45, 6 December 2012 (UTC) 485:21:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 451:19:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 428:17:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 397:13:18, 7 December 2012 (UTC) 370:05:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC) 351:05:43, 5 December 2012 (UTC) 335:05:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC) 313:05:36, 5 December 2012 (UTC) 193:18:44, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 175:06:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 161:02:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 141:02:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC) 105:22:33, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 86:22:33, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 61:20:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 3674:and submit your choices on 3602:and submit your choices on 3419:. Grammatically incorrect? 3267:. Thanks, and best wishes. 2157:"he who shall not be named" 1793:14:27, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 1776:partially annotated it here 1728:20:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 1694:11:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC) 1617:03:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 1569:01:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC) 1531:03:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC) 1505:23:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC) 1340:left from Uncle G's list -- 975:User talk:Drmies#neutrality 3853: 3828:MediaWiki message delivery 3755:MediaWiki message delivery 3682:MediaWiki message delivery 3672:the candidates' statements 3608:MediaWiki message delivery 3476:Eleutherococcus senticosus 2978:20:29, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2952:18:32, 15 April 2013 (UTC) 2890:Eleutherococcus senticosus 2874:19:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 2856:15:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 2836:15:15, 26 March 2013 (UTC) 1093:Getting an article on the 707:'s signature, for example. 3429:01:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC) 3425:See terms and conditions. 3406:21:08, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3391:20:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3375:19:57, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3360:19:28, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3330:17:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3308:17:01, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3293:16:34, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3277:15:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3243:07:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC) 3229:Please see my comment at 3215:15:27, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 3196:01:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 3181:00:39, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 3161:I've always been told to 3156:00:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC) 3134:03:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC) 3018:15:47, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 2938:17:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 2923:20:16, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 2907:18:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC) 2796:17:44, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 2769:17:33, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 2739:17:30, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 2702:16:59, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 2687:16:38, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 2666:15:59, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 2645:15:27, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 2626:08:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC) 2552:PinkAmpersand's talk page 1375:Fair enough. Take care -- 1172:Finney, John M T (1937). 728: 3536: 3508: 3471:16:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC) 3401: 3370: 3325: 3288: 3210: 3176: 3097:06:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 3092: 3070:06:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC) 3052:22:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC) 3047: 3037:22:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC) 2973: 2918: 2851: 1711:for the last two weeks). 2422:The first doesn't even 2270:off with "the American 1772:Breast cancer awareness 1754:) page and came across 1008:Breast cancer awareness 979:Breast cancer awareness 3115: 2716:really, really, really 2548: 1407:information than I am 1338:Charles F. Geschickter 1334:George Lenthal Cheatle 1285:Check date values in: 1214:Check date values in: 212: 75: 3795:Arbitration Committee 3722:Arbitration Committee 3649:Arbitration Committee 3622:ArbCom Elections 2016 3580:Arbitration Committee 3114: 2547: 2274:artist Skrillex". -- 1330:Joseph Colt Bloodgood 1148:Joseph Colt Bloodgood 1118:Joseph Colt Bloodgood 737:The Civility Barnstar 526:Objection to material 211: 74: 1682:opt-out instructions 1625:I have responded at 1099:Did You Know project 1024:→‎Media: re-phrased 149:there is no deadline 3584:arbitration process 3546:sufficient action. 3533:MidnightRequestLine 3505:MidnightRequestLine 3398:MidnightRequestLine 3367:MidnightRequestLine 3365:How do we do that? 3322:MidnightRequestLine 3285:MidnightRequestLine 3207:MidnightRequestLine 3173:MidnightRequestLine 3089:MidnightRequestLine 3044:MidnightRequestLine 2970:MidnightRequestLine 2915:MidnightRequestLine 2848:MidnightRequestLine 2037:cannot stop editing 2019:I advise Deicas to 1664:fix with Dab solver 1549:The Tao of Medicine 1123:neutrality response 1002:I put a request at 882:History of medicine 722:A barnstar for you! 3811:arbitration policy 3738:arbitration policy 3665:arbitration policy 3624:: Voting now open! 3596:arbitration policy 3125:deadmaus, deadmau5 3116: 2895:dynamic IP address 2811:highly promotional 2563:remove this notice 2549: 2426:the word "brostep" 1707:editors active at 1672:• Join us at the 1297:Unknown parameter 1226:Unknown parameter 919:dispute resolution 806:Knowledge's rules: 295:The truth will out 219:! Kittens promote 213: 90:remove this notice 76: 1877:Talk:Paul Krugman 1823: 1809:comment added by 1677: 1652:Psychoactive drug 1182:Annals of Surgery 902: 807: 760: 759: 475:Very insightful. 395: 240:UseTheCommandLine 17:Your recent edits 3844: 3779: 3706: 3633: 3467: 3462: 3417: 3414: 3255:Dear (editor)," 3131: 3016: 3014: 3005: 2581: 2576: 2566: 2451: 2417:reliable sources 2348: 2278: 2261: 2114: 2112: 2105: 1997: 1995: 1988: 1833:E-mail this user 1822: 1803: 1791: 1765: 1759: 1757:pie chart at bca 1667: 1660:check to confirm 1385: 1350: 1320: 1306: 1300: 1294: 1288: 1283: 1281: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1245: 1235: 1229: 1223: 1217: 1212: 1210: 1202: 1200: 1197: 1178: 1161: 1140: 1066: 1049: 991: 972: 971: 896: 815: 799: 777:Why thank you :) 746:⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht 733: 726: 725: 671:relatively new. 446: 441: 435: 390: 386: 93: 49: 43: 25: 24: 3852: 3851: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3780: 3772: 3767: 3766: 3707: 3699: 3694: 3693: 3677:the voting page 3634: 3626: 3604:the voting page 3570: 3478: 3465: 3460: 3443: 3415: 3412: 3388: 3357: 3342: 3250: 3227: 3141: 3129: 3109: 3025: 3012: 3008: 3001: 2999: 2992: 2884: 2807:reliable source 2803: 2653: 2611: 2579: 2574: 2567: 2556: 2541: 2449: 2346: 2276: 2259: 2251: 2108: 2101: 2099: 1991: 1984: 1982: 1804: 1800: 1782: 1761: 1755: 1735: 1701: 1674:DPL WikiProject 1648: 1581:false dichotomy 1545: 1435: 1376: 1341: 1311: 1296: 1284: 1274: 1269: 1243: 1238: 1225: 1213: 1203: 1198: 1176: 1171: 1152: 1134: 1091: 1057: 1000: 982: 969: 966: 911: 892:. Regards, -- 886:Manual of Style 878: 816: 813: 784: 753: 724: 693: 503: 444: 439: 433: 388: 323:"will come out" 297: 258: 237: 205: 128: 94: 83: 68: 34:by typing four 32:sign your posts 22: 19: 12: 11: 5: 3850: 3848: 3818:the candidates 3781: 3774: 3773: 3771: 3768: 3745:the candidates 3708: 3701: 3700: 3698: 3695: 3635: 3628: 3627: 3625: 3619: 3573: 3569: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3543: 3477: 3474: 3442: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3384: 3353: 3341: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3249: 3246: 3226: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3188:Obi-Wan Kenobi 3148:Obi-Wan Kenobi 3140: 3137: 3108: 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3024: 3021: 3010: 2991: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2883: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2843: 2802: 2799: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2720: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2652: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2633:Robert F. Chew 2610: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2557:Message added 2555: 2542: 2540: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2441: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2433: 2430: 2427: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2379: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2284: 2283: 2250: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2213: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2149:User:Charles35 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1848: 1847: 1799: 1796: 1734: 1731: 1713: 1712: 1700: 1697: 1647: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1620: 1619: 1599: 1598: 1576: 1575: 1544: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1463: 1434: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1355: 1354: 1308: 1307: 1236: 1090: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1054: 1053: 1041: 1036: 1031: 1026: 1021: 999: 996: 965: 962: 961: 960: 910: 907: 877: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 837: 836: 812: 786:I've put in a 783: 780: 779: 778: 758: 757: 749: 740: 739: 734: 723: 720: 692: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 663: 662: 661: 660: 642: 641: 640: 639: 632: 631: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 562: 561: 560: 559: 541: 540: 507:Dispute Review 502: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 354: 353: 296: 293: 292: 291: 257: 254: 233:subst:Kittynap 206: 204: 201: 200: 199: 198: 197: 196: 195: 127: 124: 123: 122: 84:Message added 82: 69: 67: 64: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3849: 3838: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3824: 3819: 3814: 3812: 3808: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3791: 3788: 3787: 3778: 3769: 3765: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3752: 3751: 3746: 3741: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3718: 3715: 3714: 3705: 3696: 3692: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3679: 3678: 3673: 3668: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3650: 3645: 3642: 3641: 3632: 3623: 3620: 3618: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3568: 3565: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3548:Sminthopsis84 3544: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3519:Sminthopsis84 3516: 3515: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3491: 3487: 3486:Sminthopsis84 3483: 3475: 3473: 3472: 3469: 3468: 3463: 3456: 3455:WP:COMMONNAME 3452: 3448: 3440: 3430: 3427: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3403: 3399: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3387: 3382: 3381:Insulam Simia 3378: 3377: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3356: 3351: 3350:Insulam Simia 3347: 3339: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3256: 3253: 3247: 3245: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3224: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3169: 3164: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3138: 3136: 3135: 3132: 3126: 3121: 3113: 3106: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3059: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3022: 3020: 3019: 3015: 3013: 3006: 3004: 2997: 2989: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2944:Sminthopsis84 2941: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2930:Sminthopsis84 2926: 2925: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2904: 2900: 2899:Sminthopsis84 2896: 2892: 2891: 2881: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2844: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2812: 2808: 2800: 2798: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2740: 2736: 2732: 2728: 2727: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2684: 2680: 2675: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2586: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2577: 2564: 2560: 2553: 2546: 2538: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2455: 2452: 2446: 2442: 2439: 2434: 2431: 2428: 2425: 2421: 2420: 2418: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2352: 2349: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2282: 2279: 2273: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2262: 2256: 2248: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2117: 2113: 2111: 2106: 2104: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2075: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2000: 1996: 1994: 1989: 1987: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1797: 1795: 1794: 1789: 1785: 1779: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1764: 1758: 1753: 1750: 1747: 1743: 1738: 1732: 1730: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1714:I started an 1710: 1706: 1698: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1678: 1675: 1671: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1645: 1639: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1605: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1587: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1542: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1464: 1461: 1457: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1432: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1388: 1383: 1379: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1348: 1344: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1318: 1314: 1304: 1292: 1279: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1256:(6). Canada: 1255: 1251: 1250: 1242: 1237: 1233: 1221: 1208: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1159: 1155: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1138: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1089:Did You Know? 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1064: 1060: 1052: 1048: 1042: 1040: 1037: 1035: 1032: 1030: 1027: 1025: 1022: 1020: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1013: 1009: 1005: 997: 995: 994: 989: 985: 980: 976: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 946: 945: 944: 940: 936: 931: 928: 924: 920: 916: 908: 906: 905: 900: 895: 891: 887: 883: 875: 867: 863: 859: 858:Amadscientist 855: 854: 853: 849: 845: 841: 840: 839: 838: 835: 831: 827: 826:Amadscientist 823: 822: 821: 820: 817: 809: 805: 802: 798: 794: 789: 781: 776: 775: 774: 773: 769: 765: 756: 752: 747: 742: 741: 738: 735: 732: 727: 721: 719: 718: 715: 714: 713: 706: 702: 698: 690: 682: 678: 674: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 659: 655: 651: 650:Amadscientist 646: 645: 644: 643: 636: 635: 634: 633: 630: 626: 622: 617: 616: 615: 614: 610: 606: 605:Amadscientist 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 573: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 558: 554: 550: 545: 544: 543: 542: 539: 535: 531: 530:Amadscientist 527: 523: 522: 521: 520: 516: 512: 511:Amadscientist 508: 500: 486: 482: 478: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 452: 449: 448: 447: 442: 431: 430: 429: 425: 421: 417: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 398: 394: 391: 385: 381: 377: 373: 372: 371: 367: 363: 358: 357: 356: 355: 352: 349: 346: 343: 339: 338: 337: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 315: 314: 311: 308: 305: 301: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 277: 276: 275: 271: 267: 263: 255: 253: 250: 249: 245: 241: 236: 234: 230: 225: 222: 218: 210: 202: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 177: 176: 172: 168: 164: 163: 162: 158: 154: 150: 145: 144: 143: 142: 138: 134: 125: 121: 117: 113: 109: 108: 107: 106: 102: 98: 91: 87: 80: 73: 65: 63: 62: 58: 54: 48: 42: 37: 33: 29: 16: 3821: 3815: 3792: 3784: 3782: 3748: 3742: 3719: 3711: 3709: 3675: 3669: 3646: 3638: 3636: 3571: 3479: 3458: 3444: 3424: 3420: 3343: 3257: 3254: 3251: 3228: 3202: 3167: 3162: 3142: 3117: 3084: 3062:WhatamIdoing 3029:WhatamIdoing 3026: 3009: 3003:MisterShiney 3002: 2993: 2888: 2885: 2804: 2801:oxyfresh.com 2781: 2715: 2673: 2654: 2612: 2572: 2570: 2568: 2450:Escape Orbit 2423: 2347:Escape Orbit 2277:Escape Orbit 2271: 2260:Escape Orbit 2252: 2109: 2102: 2061: 2036: 2024: 2020: 1992: 1985: 1832: 1828: 1805:— Preceding 1801: 1780: 1767: 1763:this version 1748: 1739: 1736: 1704: 1702: 1679: 1649: 1603: 1594: 1590: 1585: 1584: 1548: 1546: 1497:Peregrine981 1482:Peregrine981 1459: 1455: 1440:Peregrine981 1436: 1408: 1404: 1309: 1287:|accessdate= 1278:cite journal 1253: 1247: 1239:AGN (1935). 1216:|accessdate= 1207:cite journal 1186: 1180: 1166: 1146: 1133:, pp. 16–20) 1116: 1109: 1092: 1055: 1050: 1001: 967: 932: 926: 912: 879: 785: 764:Anthonyhcole 761: 736: 711: 708: 694: 601: 572:WP:INTEGRITY 525: 506: 504: 437: 436: 415: 375: 322: 318: 316: 298: 259: 256:Thank you!!! 251: 238: 229:subst:Kitten 226: 214: 183:again, FYI. 129: 97:WhatamIdoing 95: 20: 3823:voting page 3750:voting page 3466:message me! 3421:Correct it! 2616:. Exactly. 2399:WP:NOTAVOTE 1798:Discussion? 1737:Hi Charles 1656:Antagonists 1635:HairyWombat 1566:HairyWombat 1260:: 665–666. 1125:during the 705:User:NE Ent 321:instead of 319:"will out" 179:Replied at 3807:topic bans 3734:topic bans 3661:topic bans 3592:topic bans 2724:WP:PROVEIT 2575:PinkAmpers 2561:. You can 2145:User:Zad68 1684:. Thanks, 1557:Adaptogens 1553:Adaptogens 876:BC or BCE? 782:RFC at DRN 416:especially 376:widespread 266:Biosthmors 185:Biosthmors 167:Biosthmors 153:Biosthmors 133:Biosthmors 88:. You can 28:talk pages 3803:site bans 3730:site bans 3657:site bans 3588:site bans 3451:Tech N9ne 3344:Then the 3168:talk page 3130:EarwigBot 3058:WP:ADMINs 2788:Charles35 2761:Charles35 2731:alteripse 2719:standard. 2694:alteripse 2679:Charles35 2674:internist 2658:alteripse 2637:Charles35 2614:Well said 2595:Charles35 2513:Charles35 2445:talk page 2403:Charles35 2369:Charles35 2331:Charles35 2311:Charles35 2291:Charles35 2255:talk page 2221:Charles35 2203:Charles35 2066:Charles35 1956:Charles35 1903:Charles35 1837:Charles35 1668:Read the 1609:Charles35 1551:compares 1543:Adaptogen 1523:Charles35 1468:Charles35 1413:Charles35 1363:Charles35 1301:ignored ( 1230:ignored ( 1167:See also 1121:) in his 1097:via the ' 1095:main-page 1075:Charles35 844:Charles35 673:Charles35 621:Charles35 549:Charles35 477:Charles35 420:Charles35 362:Charles35 327:Charles35 281:Charles35 112:Charles35 3386:contribs 3355:contribs 3346:deadmau5 3248:Deadmaus 3085:a little 2784:WP:MEDRS 2539:Talkback 2249:Skrillex 2217:unbanned 2153:WP:CRUSH 2033:WP:CPUSH 2029:WP:CPUSH 2025:directly 1855:WP:CRUSH 1819:contribs 1807:unsigned 1752:contribs 1595:anything 1405:deleting 1113:contribs 977:. Would 915:WP:NPOVN 701:redirect 638:dispute. 580:WP:UNDUE 221:WikiLove 66:Talkback 3203:several 2809:and is 2424:mention 2272:dubstep 1829:Toolbox 1766:of the 1686:DPL bot 1336:and/or 1299:|month= 1266:1561507 1228:|month= 1195:1390300 1103:Uncle G 1010:as per 814:complex 697:redlink 584:WP:TONE 576:WP:NPOV 384:Andreas 126:Welcome 53:SineBot 3578:. The 3501:WP:3RR 3461:STATic 3300:Apteva 3269:Apteva 3261:WP:FOC 2862:WP:FTN 2161:Deicas 1881:Deicas 1811:Deicas 1742:Drmies 1591:actual 1456:unless 1409:adding 923:WP:ANI 909:Advice 890:WP:BCE 590:, and 342:Onorem 304:Onorem 217:kitten 36:tildes 3416:hotch 3265:WP:AN 3163:never 2990:Hello 2618:Ceoil 2580:& 1784:Senra 1720:siafu 1460:might 1378:Senra 1343:Senra 1313:Senra 1244:(PDF) 1177:(PDF) 1154:Senra 1059:Senra 1051:Fixed 984:Senra 950:Bbb23 935:Bbb23 894:Dfred 751:Stalk 588:WP:OR 445:Stani 440:Stani 3832:talk 3793:The 3759:talk 3720:The 3686:talk 3647:The 3612:talk 3552:talk 3537:talk 3523:talk 3509:talk 3490:talk 3402:talk 3371:talk 3326:talk 3304:talk 3289:talk 3273:talk 3239:talk 3211:talk 3192:talk 3177:talk 3152:talk 3139:Note 3093:talk 3066:talk 3048:talk 3033:talk 2974:talk 2948:talk 2934:talk 2919:talk 2903:talk 2870:talk 2866:Ronz 2852:talk 2832:talk 2828:Ronz 2826:. -- 2821:talk 2817:Ronz 2792:talk 2765:talk 2735:talk 2698:talk 2683:talk 2662:talk 2641:talk 2622:talk 2609:Prop 2599:talk 2517:talk 2407:talk 2373:talk 2335:talk 2315:talk 2295:talk 2225:talk 2207:talk 2165:talk 2070:talk 1960:talk 1907:talk 1885:talk 1841:talk 1815:talk 1788:talk 1774:and 1746:talk 1724:talk 1690:talk 1629:and 1613:talk 1527:talk 1501:talk 1486:talk 1472:talk 1444:talk 1417:talk 1382:talk 1367:talk 1347:talk 1317:talk 1303:help 1291:help 1232:help 1220:help 1158:talk 1137:help 1107:talk 1079:talk 1063:talk 988:talk 954:talk 939:talk 899:talk 862:talk 848:talk 830:talk 793:note 768:talk 677:talk 654:talk 625:talk 609:talk 592:WP:V 553:talk 534:talk 515:talk 501:DR/N 481:talk 424:talk 366:talk 331:talk 285:talk 270:talk 262:this 244:talk 189:talk 171:talk 157:talk 137:talk 116:talk 101:talk 57:talk 3572:Hi, 3441:RfC 3235:PBS 3233:-- 3023:FYI 2159:. 2103:Zad 2021:not 1986:Zad 1835:". 1770:of 1716:RfC 1705:all 1670:FAQ 1433:DST 1262:PMC 1191:PMC 1187:105 927:you 804:(c) 801:(t) 797:WLU 788:RFC 691:FYI 393:466 380:NME 348:Dil 310:Dil 235:}}. 151:"! 44:or 3834:) 3826:. 3805:, 3761:) 3753:. 3732:, 3688:) 3680:. 3659:, 3614:) 3590:, 3554:) 3539:) 3525:) 3511:) 3492:) 3484:. 3413:Tb 3404:) 3389:) 3383:(/ 3373:) 3358:) 3352:(/ 3328:) 3306:) 3291:) 3275:) 3241:) 3213:) 3194:) 3179:) 3154:) 3095:) 3068:) 3050:) 3035:) 2976:) 2950:) 2936:) 2921:) 2905:) 2872:) 2854:) 2834:) 2794:) 2767:) 2737:) 2726:. 2700:) 2685:) 2664:) 2643:) 2624:) 2601:) 2571:— 2519:) 2409:) 2375:) 2344:-- 2337:) 2317:) 2297:) 2227:) 2219:. 2209:) 2167:) 2110:68 2072:) 1993:68 1962:) 1909:) 1887:) 1843:) 1821:) 1817:• 1781:-- 1726:) 1692:) 1662:| 1615:) 1604:no 1529:) 1503:) 1488:) 1474:) 1446:) 1419:) 1369:) 1310:-- 1295:; 1282:: 1280:}} 1276:{{ 1254:33 1252:. 1246:. 1224:; 1211:: 1209:}} 1205:{{ 1185:. 1179:. 1081:) 1056:-- 956:) 941:) 864:) 850:) 832:) 770:) 744:— 709:— 679:) 656:) 627:) 611:) 594:." 586:, 582:, 578:, 574:, 555:) 536:) 517:) 483:) 426:) 389:JN 368:) 333:) 287:) 272:) 246:) 191:) 173:) 159:) 139:) 118:) 103:) 59:) 51:-- 3830:( 3757:( 3684:( 3610:( 3550:( 3535:( 3521:( 3507:( 3488:( 3400:( 3369:( 3324:( 3302:( 3287:( 3271:( 3237:( 3209:( 3190:( 3175:( 3150:( 3123:" 3091:( 3064:( 3046:( 3031:( 3011:✉ 2972:( 2946:( 2932:( 2917:( 2901:( 2868:( 2850:( 2830:( 2819:( 2790:( 2763:( 2733:( 2696:( 2681:( 2660:( 2639:( 2620:( 2597:( 2554:. 2515:( 2405:( 2371:( 2333:( 2313:( 2293:( 2223:( 2205:( 2163:( 2068:( 1958:( 1905:( 1883:( 1839:( 1813:( 1790:) 1786:( 1749:· 1744:( 1722:( 1688:( 1676:. 1658:( 1611:( 1586:s 1525:( 1499:( 1484:( 1470:( 1442:( 1415:( 1384:) 1380:( 1365:( 1349:) 1345:( 1319:) 1315:( 1305:) 1293:) 1289:( 1272:. 1234:) 1222:) 1218:( 1201:. 1160:) 1156:( 1139:) 1110:· 1105:( 1077:( 1065:) 1061:( 990:) 986:( 952:( 937:( 901:) 897:( 860:( 846:( 828:( 810:/ 766:( 748:/ 675:( 652:( 623:( 607:( 551:( 532:( 513:( 479:( 434:→ 422:( 364:( 345:♠ 329:( 307:♠ 283:( 268:( 242:( 187:( 169:( 155:( 147:" 135:( 114:( 99:( 81:. 55:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index