554:. I think Bagumba and Flyer22 both understood my point, which was simply why is Michael Jordan being mentioned in an introduction on Lebron James for an encyclopedia article? I think someone had re-enterred most of my edits, since my post, which were improvements. My point was simply that both Jordan and Lebron have their own encyclopedia article, so Michael Jordan does not belong in encyclopedia introduction describing Lebron James. Does Christiano Ronaldo belong in an encyclopedia introduction describing Leo Messi? I do not think so either. I was not enterring the whole argument of whether or not Lebron James is the GOAT or not (which is an opinionated conversation - as some people like Shannon Sharpe believe so, while others like Skip Bayless do not.)
494:, "I might have to start an RfC on this and propose different wordings. That editors keep taking issue with something that is widely stated/reported is an issue. Knowledge (XXG) cares not about your personal opinion." I meant "your" in a general sense, to refer to any Knowledge (XXG) editor wanting to go by their personal opinions/feelings rather than WP:Due weight. I'm aware that consensus can change. But if consensus were for the lead excluding any mention that James is considered the greatest, that would be a WP:Due weight problem. And like the "consensus can change" guideline states, "On the other hand, proposing to change a recently established consensus can be disruptive." This might be a case where we need to go with similar wording used at the
1112:
on there own without LLM's. Of course it needs to be evaluated by a human editor (preferably the original user making the edits) as you said. Indeed, AI does have challenges, such as not having editors using it irresponsiblity requiring massive wiki cleanups, no one wants that. Hopefully in the long run AI does not become like the Matrix with AI crushing our minds and spirits. As AI is an evolving space, weighing the benefits and negatives of LLM's, hopefully it will be implemented into wiki responsibily such that it is a net benefit to wiki. There was a nice video on that WP:LLM page by the columbia journalism school on using LLM's responsibly. Cheers,
486:, I meant to reply to you soon after your ping, but my Internet messed up. Yes, I understand what Mikecurry1's point was, but, given that Mikecurry1 stuck with "comparison" wording, the wording they chose was vague and poor. That was my point on that, other than the fact that it is encyclopedic/WP:Due to mention the comparison in the lead. As seen above, I also mentioned that I've tried different wordings, which includes simply noting that James is often considered the greatest. When we try to use that wording, however, we get some editors coming along and changing the text to "one of the greatest", which downplays the matter per my arguments seen at
1089:. Thanks for pointing it out (created December 2022: I've got to do a better job of keeping up). Overall, it seems to discourage using LLMs, but I suppose if the LLM "source" is identified, that's respecting transparency. It also says that LLM output needs to be evaluated by a human editor (preferably the original user making the edit). I can see that you've used them responsibly. I just worry that a growing gaggle of other editors will rely on them indiscriminately, creating edit messes that others need to clean up. That, and AI crushing our minds and spirits like roaches under the gaslights. Cheers.
1057:
the disclosure as such. I did write that sentence, and used chatgpt for proof reading and editing for its thoughts. I also agree with your feedback on reverting my edit in that the sentence sounded like too much of a mission statement there. That is fine and I agree. Perhaps, we can find something that does not sound like a mission statement for the intro instead. All of your edits off of my edits seemed reasonable and good edits to me.
425:. The current wording is after having tried different wordings and having settled on the "comparison" wording as a compromise for those who take issue with simply noting that LeBron is often considered the greatest. These people act like Jordan is being dethroned by simply acknowledging what various reliable sources and analysts state. Like I noted when reverting you, "As an encyclopedia, we stick to what the reliable sources state and with
934:
846:
703:
615:
330:
255:
36:
429:
weight." And your "Often compared for the title of the greatest of all time" wording makes no sense. Compared for what? To who? If going with the "compared to" wording, we aren't going to censor that it's Jordan he's often compared to. Whether one likes it or not, this is part of his legacy, which is
1111:
Yes, I thought you may not have been aware of that new page. There are so many pages on wiki with guidelines they are hard to know them all. I agree with you, I think there will be a challenge of how to use LLM's responsibly, such as it should be used by people who have made similar edits already
229:
Good points. The information was originally copied from another wiki article describing the global ranking and then further edited for copyright protection by Patar Knight (who originally deleted it). I or others can improve the tone and add the lead sentence, etc., per your suggestions to improve
1056:
I do understand there are several concerns with LLM's as they are becoming more mainstream. I know the LLM space will evolve over time and they are still figuring out the relevent wiki policies. I try to follow all wiki policies about LLM's, where right now LLM-assisted content is accepted, with
87:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
1048:
Indeed, I mentioned Chat GPT and the version number, and LLM-Assisted per wikipedia's policies on large language models. In case you are not aware of WP:Large language models, "Disclosure: Every edit that incorporates LLM output should be marked as LLM-assisted by identifying the name and, if
1025:. Please do not incorporate artificial intelligence input into your edits. There is no way to trace where the underlying information comes from, or how it has resulted in the AI output. This is contrary to the fundamentals of editing Knowledge (XXG), especially transparent verifiability.
576:. I was thinking of a new sentence for the GOAT debate sentence, in light of showing Lebron more respect, and his third championship and finals mvp on three different franchises. It would be goood to get your opinions on Lebron's talk page now as to what you think for this sentence now.
267:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
456:
I believe
Mikecurry1's point was that Jordan did not need to be mentioned in the lead, but was ok with James being considered the greatest. There's never been a consensus on the specific point of Jordan being mentioned in the lead, and anyways
205:
This still isn't an acceptable article. It's sourced only to
Reuters, isn't written in an encyclopedic tone, and doesn't have a lead sentence that describes the topic. Do you plan to improve this article further in the near future?
498:
article. In that article, we state "Many players and analysts have called him the greatest shooter in NBA history." But in the case of that article, the very first source states "many," which exempts the "many" text from being
68:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read
523:
Also, Curry's case is different because there is no consistent "Curry vs. " debate when it comes to the greatest shooter. At this point in time, Curry is generally accepted as the the greatest shooter in NBA history.
979:
891:
746:
658:
373:
295:
963:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
875:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
730:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
642:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
357:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
279:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
809:
119:). This was absolute bull regarding a speedy deletion of the article. It was immediately deleted, before any time to contest the deletion. The information was taken from another wiki article
948:
860:
716:
628:
343:
123:
and not the site mentioned. Moreover, I have no affiliation with
Reuters in creating this article as an advertisement for the ranking. Absolute crap, How do I contest this? (
796:? I don’t understand why foreign countries would choose to locate their embassies there on the basis of this junior palace being nearby. I could understand such a claim about
145:
84:
61:
29:
813:
461:. This is not support on my part for either wording, merely that it's a fair argument if Mikecurry1 chooses to pursue this and start a discussion at
65:
25:
1002:
914:
769:
680:
395:
309:
217:
1085:
92:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the
998:
910:
765:
676:
391:
305:
120:
972:
884:
739:
651:
366:
288:
45:
21:
Hey just wanted to say thanks for your understanding on the Icl wiki page, really admire the way you were open to discussion!
73:
89:
984:
896:
790:
Hello. Could you please explain why you added the sentence that says embassies are located in South
Kensington due to
751:
663:
487:
422:
378:
300:
500:
52:
529:
508:
439:
960:
872:
727:
639:
354:
276:
211:
241:
I tried to implement your suggestions. Please take a look and feel free to make any changes you think.
223:
107:
942:
854:
710:
622:
337:
263:
1102:
1038:
573:
551:
525:
504:
451:
435:
116:
103:
956:
868:
723:
635:
350:
272:
801:
171:
1050:
797:
470:
462:
207:
968:
880:
735:
647:
431:
362:
284:
69:
991:
903:
784:
758:
670:
385:
167:
971:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
964:
883:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
876:
738:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
731:
650:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
643:
458:
426:
365:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
358:
287:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
280:
1113:
1066:
1058:
824:
585:
577:
555:
488:
Talk:LeBron James/Archive 5#Removal of "Greatest play of all time" acclimation from intro?
423:
Talk:LeBron James/Archive 5#Removal of "Greatest play of all time" acclimation from intro?
231:
189:
152:
162:
was relevant to the article subject of the university rankings they do. I removed it. —
64:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
1098:
1034:
99:
495:
144:
When copying material in
Knowledge (XXG) to other parts of wikipedia like you did on
1019:
Some of your recent edit summaries have mentioned Chat GPT feedback or involvement
569:
547:
483:
466:
933:
845:
702:
614:
329:
254:
185:
163:
88:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
805:
44:
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
1106:
1074:
1042:
1006:
975:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
918:
887:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
832:
817:
773:
742:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
684:
654:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
593:
563:
533:
512:
474:
443:
399:
369:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
313:
291:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
197:
175:
158:
template on the talk page. It didn't look like anything you copied from
952:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
864:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
720:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
632:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
430:
why it's covered in the "Legacy" section of his article. And, yes, per
347:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
159:
79:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
988:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
900:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
755:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
667:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
382:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
978:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
946:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
890:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
858:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
745:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
657:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
372:
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
294:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
714:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
626:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
130:
Spoke to Patar Knight who is restoring this, for this reason.
94:
34:
341:
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
133:
This new page was restored. Needed to use WP:Copywithin
1023:
1020:
959:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
871:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
791:
726:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
638:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
491:
418:
414:
353:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
275:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
146:Reuters - The World's Most Innovative Universities
62:Reuters - The World's Most Innovative Universities
30:Reuters - The World's Most Innovative Universities
66:section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion
42:
1053:." I did precisely that in full transparency.
434:, it also belongs in the lead of his article.
8:
24:
697:
609:
324:
90:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
823:Yes, I'll respond on the city talk page.
810:2A04:4A43:4DBF:E9A1:E5D0:6D79:AD75:4F4A
46:the guide to writing your first article
1086:Knowledge (XXG):Large language models
7:
943:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
855:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
711:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
623:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
338:2019 Arbitration Committee elections
264:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
1049:possible, version of the AI in the
961:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
927:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
873:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
839:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
728:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
694:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
640:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
606:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
355:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
277:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
115:Thank You for alerting me of this (
51:You may want to consider using the
321:ArbCom 2019 election voter message
248:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
230:this article for the near future.
14:
261:Hello, Mikecurry1. Voting in the
127:) 23:37, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
74:Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Organizations
1083:I was not aware of the essay at
932:
844:
701:
613:
490:. All of this is why I recently
328:
253:
982:and submit your choices on the
894:and submit your choices on the
749:and submit your choices on the
661:and submit your choices on the
376:and submit your choices on the
298:and submit your choices on the
121:College and university rankings
793:Kensington Palace being nearby
584:) 19:14, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
421:, it's been discussed before:
108:21:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
1:
1007:00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
919:01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
774:00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
685:02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
400:00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
314:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
833:14:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
818:09:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
594:20:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
564:19:14, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
409:LeBron James as the greatest
55:to help you create articles.
534:13:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
513:12:18, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
475:06:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
444:05:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
224:16:41, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
198:23:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
176:18:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
17:Cheers for being a awesome!
1139:
1107:14:23, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
1075:06:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
1043:22:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
999:MediaWiki message delivery
911:MediaWiki message delivery
766:MediaWiki message delivery
677:MediaWiki message delivery
392:MediaWiki message delivery
306:MediaWiki message delivery
60:A tag has been placed on
1117:
1070:
1062:
996:to your user talk page.
908:to your user talk page.
828:
763:to your user talk page.
675:to your user talk page.
589:
581:
559:
390:to your user talk page.
235:
193:
188:! Thanks! Good update
124:
76:for more information.
95:deleting administrator
81:contest the nomination
70:the guidelines on spam
57:
39:
957:Arbitration Committee
940:Hello! Voting in the
869:Arbitration Committee
852:Hello! Voting in the
724:Arbitration Committee
708:Hello! Voting in the
636:Arbitration Committee
620:Hello! Voting in the
351:Arbitration Committee
335:Hello! Voting in the
273:Arbitration Committee
38:
459:consensus can change
973:arbitration policy
885:arbitration policy
740:arbitration policy
652:arbitration policy
367:arbitration policy
289:arbitration policy
40:
1097:
1033:
1009:
921:
802:St James's Palace
798:Buckingham Palace
781:
780:
776:
691:
690:
501:WP:Weasel wording
463:Talk:LeBron James
406:
405:
148:you should use a
85:visiting the page
1130:
1090:
1026:
997:
995:
936:
909:
907:
848:
785:South Kensington
764:
762:
705:
698:
674:
617:
610:
455:
389:
332:
325:
257:
220:
214:
157:
151:
97:
37:
1138:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1096:
1032:
1017:
1012:
1011:
989:
937:
929:
924:
923:
901:
849:
841:
804:and definitely
788:
756:
696:
668:
608:
449:
411:
383:
323:
318:
317:
258:
250:
218:
212:
155:
149:
93:
58:
35:
33:
26:Speedy deletion
19:
12:
11:
5:
1136:
1134:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1091:
1078:
1077:
1054:
1027:
1016:
1013:
980:the candidates
949:eligible users
938:
931:
930:
928:
925:
892:the candidates
861:eligible users
850:
843:
842:
840:
837:
836:
835:
787:
782:
779:
778:
747:the candidates
717:eligible users
706:
695:
692:
689:
688:
659:the candidates
629:eligible users
618:
607:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
574:Flyer22 Reborn
552:Flyer22 Reborn
539:
538:
537:
536:
526:Flyer22 Reborn
518:
517:
516:
515:
505:Flyer22 Reborn
478:
477:
452:Flyer22 Reborn
436:Flyer22 Reborn
410:
407:
404:
403:
374:the candidates
344:eligible users
333:
322:
319:
296:the candidates
259:
252:
251:
249:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
203:
202:
201:
200:
179:
178:
141:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
53:Article Wizard
41:
32:
28:nomination of
23:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1135:
1119:
1115:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1094:
1088:
1087:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1055:
1052:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1030:
1024:
1021:
1014:
1010:
1008:
1004:
1000:
993:
987:
986:
981:
976:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
953:
951:
950:
945:
944:
935:
926:
922:
920:
916:
912:
905:
899:
898:
893:
888:
886:
882:
878:
874:
870:
865:
863:
862:
857:
856:
847:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
821:
820:
819:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
794:
786:
783:
777:
775:
771:
767:
760:
754:
753:
748:
743:
741:
737:
733:
729:
725:
719:
718:
713:
712:
707:
704:
700:
699:
693:
687:
686:
682:
678:
672:
666:
665:
660:
655:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
631:
630:
625:
624:
619:
616:
612:
611:
605:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
566:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
535:
531:
527:
522:
521:
520:
519:
514:
510:
506:
502:
497:
496:Stephen Curry
493:
489:
485:
482:
481:
480:
479:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
453:
448:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
433:
428:
424:
420:
416:
408:
402:
401:
397:
393:
387:
381:
380:
375:
370:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
346:
345:
340:
339:
334:
331:
327:
326:
320:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
302:
297:
292:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
266:
265:
256:
247:
240:
239:
237:
233:
228:
227:
226:
225:
221:
215:
209:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
182:
181:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
154:
147:
143:
142:
132:
131:
129:
128:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
112:
111:
110:
109:
105:
101:
96:
91:
86:
82:
77:
75:
71:
67:
63:
56:
54:
49:
47:
31:
27:
22:
16:
1092:
1084:
1051:edit summary
1028:
1018:
983:
977:
954:
947:
941:
939:
895:
889:
866:
859:
853:
851:
792:
789:
750:
744:
721:
715:
709:
662:
656:
633:
627:
621:
412:
377:
371:
348:
342:
336:
299:
293:
270:
262:
260:
208:power~enwiki
204:
184:Sounds good
80:
78:
59:
50:
43:
20:
985:voting page
897:voting page
752:voting page
664:voting page
465:. Regards.—
379:voting page
301:voting page
1114:Mikecurry1
1067:Mikecurry1
1059:Mikecurry1
969:topic bans
881:topic bans
825:Mikecurry1
736:topic bans
648:topic bans
586:Mikecurry1
578:Mikecurry1
556:Mikecurry1
413:Regarding
363:topic bans
285:topic bans
232:Mikecurry1
190:Mikecurry1
1099:Willondon
1035:Willondon
965:site bans
877:site bans
806:Whitehall
732:site bans
644:site bans
359:site bans
281:site bans
117:Natureium
100:Natureium
1015:Chat GPT
992:NoACEMM
904:NoACEMM
759:NoACEMM
671:NoACEMM
570:Bagumba
548:Bagumba
484:Bagumba
467:Bagumba
432:WP:Lead
386:NoACEMM
160:Reuters
1093:signed
1029:signed
492:stated
427:WP:Due
172:Spjall
153:copied
186:Frayæ
164:Frayæ
1118:talk
1103:talk
1071:talk
1063:talk
1039:talk
1003:talk
955:The
915:talk
867:The
829:talk
814:talk
770:talk
722:The
681:talk
634:The
590:talk
582:talk
572:and
560:talk
550:and
530:talk
509:talk
471:talk
440:talk
419:this
417:and
415:this
396:talk
349:The
310:talk
271:The
236:talk
194:talk
168:Talk
125:talk
104:talk
98:.
72:and
1105:)
1041:)
800:or
568:Hi
546:Hi
83:by
1095:,
1073:)
1065:)
1031:,
1022:,
1005:)
994:}}
990:{{
967:,
917:)
906:}}
902:{{
879:,
831:)
816:)
808:.
772:)
761:}}
757:{{
734:,
683:)
673:}}
669:{{
646:,
592:)
562:)
532:)
511:)
503:.
473:)
442:)
398:)
388:}}
384:{{
361:,
312:)
304:.
283:,
238:)
222:)
216:,
196:)
174:)
156:}}
150:{{
106:)
1120:)
1116:(
1101:(
1069:(
1061:(
1037:(
1001:(
913:(
827:(
812:(
768:(
679:(
588:(
580:(
558:(
528:(
507:(
469:(
454::
450:@
438:(
394:(
308:(
234:(
219:ν
213:π
210:(
192:(
170:/
166:(
102:(
48:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.