99:
because I was despondent about how the Pussy Cat Dolls or Mariah Carey, or I don't know, some other anti-feminist slease, get huge articles despite their lyrical inanity and musical derivativeness, whereas there's Beck with stubs for songs that could inspire hours of analysis... so I started what has been, lamentably, mostly a one-person attempt to build some Beck pages that are more than two-line explanations of when it was released and what score it got in the Top 40. MTV is quite an early article (my third on Beck, after writing something huge about the Banjo Story, which got deleted, and then replaced with something 1/10th the size. Fun!) and thus quite bad example of what I've been doing... the latest that I wrote was
834:
761:
107:
to 'wanna' by someone... after all, if you note, the correct spelling is given on the first line of the article. Anyhow, it would make perfect sense to move the article to its proper name; I or you can do it, I don't mind. Anyone who would object is slightly off their orbit, but I doubt that anyone would really notice.
567:
he came to
Seattle Wa in 1994 (never released) where he stated to me that the majority of the interviews he had done up to that point were mostly ficticious, wherein the authors would add quotes and misinformation to Beck's stories for whatever reason. You can verify what I am telling you with Giovanni Ribisi/ Beck.
682:
Haha it's fine... I'm not sure whether you're to leave a response on another user's talk page or not either. Knowledge is confusing. Citations are messy and confusing at first, I know. That's good to hear about the Beck article! I just stumbled upon the Beck article one night and decided to do what I
566:
RE: Beck edit 1990. All the information is correct and factual. We were all friends back then, back when Beck and my sister were a couple. Their relationship ended in late 1991, so there are some discrepancies with your facts. I am simply trying to correct them. I also did an interview with Beck when
409:
I actually
Googled the videos and their directors. (I was pretty sure about Ross Harris and Jason Lee, but I didn't trust my memory so I Googled to make sure, then looked for others.) I'm afraid I don't know anything about whether Knowledge has friending or about userboxes. I just edit entries! Candy
106:
Anyhow, (sorry about that, I have rather the neurotic habit of wittering on.) you are totally right that the article on MMMWTSC (I hate acronyms, but there goes) is wrongly written. It's a long time ago, but I am quite sure that I created the page with the correct title, and I think that it was moved
521:
What do you mean, "big deal"? In narrative writing (e.g., books and newspapers), ampersands are not used in place of "and." It's just a matter of standard writing style. For Oxford commas, Wiki's stance is neither for nor against, but it does say, in its editing guidelines, that editors should be
339:
Hi. Yeah, I am a Beck fan. I edit his page, and related pages, a lot. One thing I am not very good at is the template stuff, though. So I don't know how to get everything to look exactly right all the time. It took me forever to figure out how to add the directors I added. I'll try to fill in the
236:
I contacted you because I really am interested in knowing what the issue is here. There is nothing besides the
Leggett mention that supports Courtney Love being a Scientologist. On the other hand, there is evidence that supports her not being one (for instance, the fact that she's spent time in
98:
I thought that I may as well write my response to you here, because firstly, it's sort of out of place on the main page and secondly, it's easier to see when one has been contacted with this. Yes, I wrote MTV Makes Me Want to Smoke Crack, and indeed a whole bunch of other Beck articles, mostly
232:
was not clear on the reliability of
Leggett's article; the RFC addressed the reliability of CoS publications, but as far as I can tell it didn't establish that all third-party sources are reliable. Nowhere in that discussion was the reliability of Leggett's article even mentioned. It had been
773:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
667:
Oh, good. I was afraid it was a bigger issue than that. I am not great with citations--every time I do one, I have to copy the template and pick my way through it. :/ It looks like you did some good work on the article. I'm going to be going over it more closely in the next few days.
846:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
603:
Okay. Really, I am not disputing anything you said. I was just curious about the "punk-poet scene" thing, because I imagined the scene was probably created by more than two people (like, maybe, also by
Channing?). But if it was created by just Beck and Rain, your wording is fine.
181:
I did find a YouTube video of her. I'd have to watch the whole thing, but the caption says she's on film supporting
Scientology. Yet I don't know the standard regarding YouTube videos. It's a self-uploading site, so it's probably considered self-published, but it's on film so....
455:
Like I was saying before, I don;t know how to put that all of the
Version 1 Information videos were directed by Beck & his family. Otherwise, Nausea & Cellphone's Dead had different videos besides the ones made on The Information.
233:
mentioned earlier, before the RFC, and in fact, someone else suggested that perhaps I should delete
Courtney Love. But it wasn't discussed beyond that, because the question at hand was whether we could cite CoS publications.
307:
Okay, thanks for the explanation. I figured it was okay because they were quoting something she said on a television show (rather than reporting gossip). But maybe someone more reliable reported it. I'll look around.
719:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
874:
801:
446:
Oh! Well, okay then. I just found a reference to it somewhere as having been directed by Ross Harris. I will go try to put it back. Hopefully I will not screw up the table. Candy 06:16, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
858:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
785:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
127:...was released for airplay in late 93, but the physical release on CD (this being WAY before digital releases) was on January 18, 1994, therefore, making it a 1994 song. I have added the source.
142:
Okay, gotcha. See my comment on your user page. However, the Loser record article says it was recorded in '93. I am sure it was '91 or '92. I will check further (unless you do it first).
381:
Thanks! and is there a way to, like, add you as my friend or something? And how did you know the directors for those videos? I've been looking for them. And how do you get userboxes?
328:
I noticed you were editing the Beck page. He's my favorite. You like him too? If you could try to to help me find some more directors for the music video table I made on the
332:
page, I would appreciate it. It was really hard to make, since I just signed up yesterday and I'm not an expert. And the New Pollution page is kind of stubbish.
117:
349:
I wish there was a way to put on the music video table that all of the Version 1 The Information music videos were directed by Beck and his family...
547:
The reason is because it's a chart from a specific week, so you can't verify whether or not the song actually placed higher after that specific week.
484:
Oh, right. I see what you're saying. I don't know how much luck I'll have, but I'll try to find out more about that. Candy 06:18, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
65:
49:
888:
815:
744:
162:
I'll try and keep an eye on them. It's not vandalism, at least not all of it, but some of it is unsourced. Thanks for letting me know!
25:
to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
69:
591:
884:
811:
740:
68:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
509:
472:
434:
397:
365:
237:
non-Scientology rehab). Since you are the one who keeps reinstating her, it seems fair to ask you what your reasoning is.
867:
794:
114:
34:
22:
731:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
879:
806:
736:
340:
missing ones if I can...they are not as easy to check as the ones I already filled in. Candy 01:59, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
262:
640:
Hey there! I tend to, when revising an article, reuse the same reftags, and simply forgot to delete the URL of a
54:
229:
197:
29:
855:
782:
552:
258:
100:
61:
587:
579:
572:
497:
460:
422:
385:
353:
187:
81:
669:
619:
605:
523:
309:
238:
143:
732:
688:
657:
167:
44:
203:
I would rather keep this discussion centralized to the article's talk page. However, the recent
842:
769:
708:
699:
505:
468:
430:
393:
361:
76:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
851:
778:
728:
712:
548:
329:
866:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
793:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
727:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
583:
568:
183:
77:
863:
790:
724:
716:
684:
653:
297:
214:
163:
859:
786:
720:
642:
618:
Ahh! I see your change from "scene" to "fanzine" now. That clears it all up! Thanks.
225:
204:
132:
39:
501:
464:
426:
389:
357:
333:
287:
283:
833:
760:
476:
278:
292:
209:
418:
If you scroll down, you will see Beck "Beercan" co directed w/Steve Hanft
648:
415:
128:
870:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
797:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
892:
819:
748:
692:
677:
661:
627:
613:
595:
556:
531:
513:
438:
401:
369:
317:
301:
266:
246:
218:
191:
171:
151:
136:
85:
715:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
873:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
800:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
906:
Personal account of Beck from 1986 to 1994- Ezra Zach Spurlock
493:
What's the big deal about ampersands & Oxford commas?
652:
article is now correctly linked. Thanks for notifying me!
854:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
781:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
707:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
8:
90:
110:Sorry about that epistle. My best wishes,
60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
899:
91:Everyone's perky and everyone's uptight
416:http://www.rossangeles.net/videos.html
7:
843:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
770:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
683:do best - revamp the whole thing :P
282:is the best source to use there for
72:, ask me on my talk page, or place
827:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
754:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
14:
733:review the candidates' statements
70:Knowledge:Where to ask a question
840:Hello, Misscandy. Voting in the
832:
767:Hello, Misscandy. Voting in the
759:
575:) 02:52, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
272:Source at List of Scientologists
877:and submit your choices on the
804:and submit your choices on the
207:on the matter was quite clear.
739:. For the Election committee,
709:Arbitration Committee election
700:ArbCom elections are now open!
522:consistent within an article.
253:RE: Edits to Loser_(Beck_song)
1:
893:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
856:Knowledge arbitration process
783:Knowledge arbitration process
749:13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
318:21:08, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
302:20:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
247:03:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
219:07:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
30:The five pillars of Knowledge
820:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
628:03:05, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
614:02:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
596:02:48, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
451:Nausea, Cellphone's Dead v.1
50:How to write a great article
735:and submit your choices on
693:23:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
678:22:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
662:21:40, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
557:01:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
267:23:24, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
192:18:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
152:23:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
137:22:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
923:
885:MediaWiki message delivery
812:MediaWiki message delivery
741:MediaWiki message delivery
172:05:16, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
86:03:36, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
673:
623:
609:
532:13:18, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
527:
514:19:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
477:12:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
450:
439:12:16, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
410:09:25, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
402:04:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
370:12:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
313:
242:
147:
118:19:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
230:List of Scientologists
198:List of Scientologists
115:It's-is-not-a-genitive
21:Hello, Misscandy, and
852:Arbitration Committee
779:Arbitration Committee
713:Arbitration Committee
414:Go to this website...
717:arbitration process
226:Request for Comment
205:Request for Comment
868:arbitration policy
795:arbitration policy
729:arbitration policy
286:. Best to find an
35:How to edit a page
599:
582:comment added by
517:
500:comment added by
480:
463:comment added by
442:
425:comment added by
405:
388:comment added by
373:
356:comment added by
290:source, instead.
914:
907:
904:
836:
763:
598:
576:
516:
494:
479:
457:
441:
419:
404:
382:
372:
350:
330:Beck discography
259:Brandt Luke Zorn
158:Duncan and Blake
75:
922:
921:
917:
916:
915:
913:
912:
911:
910:
905:
901:
897:
896:
837:
829:
824:
823:
764:
756:
737:the voting page
703:
638:
577:
564:
545:
495:
491:
458:
453:
420:
383:
379:
351:
347:
326:
274:
255:
201:
179:
160:
125:
93:
73:
55:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
920:
918:
909:
908:
898:
875:the candidates
838:
831:
830:
828:
825:
802:the candidates
765:
758:
757:
755:
752:
706:
702:
697:
696:
695:
680:
637:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
563:
560:
544:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
490:
487:
486:
485:
452:
449:
448:
447:
412:
411:
378:
375:
346:
343:
342:
341:
325:
322:
321:
320:
273:
270:
254:
251:
250:
249:
234:
200:
195:
178:
175:
159:
156:
155:
154:
124:
121:
101:Devils Haircut
92:
89:
66:sign your name
58:
57:
52:
47:
42:
37:
32:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
919:
903:
900:
895:
894:
890:
886:
882:
881:
876:
871:
869:
865:
861:
857:
853:
848:
845:
844:
835:
826:
822:
821:
817:
813:
809:
808:
803:
798:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
775:
772:
771:
762:
753:
751:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
701:
698:
694:
690:
686:
681:
679:
675:
671:
666:
665:
664:
663:
659:
655:
651:
650:
646:article. The
645:
644:
643:Rolling Stone
635:
629:
625:
621:
617:
616:
615:
611:
607:
602:
601:
600:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
574:
570:
562:Beck and Rain
561:
559:
558:
554:
550:
542:
535:
534:
533:
529:
525:
520:
519:
518:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
488:
483:
482:
481:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
445:
444:
443:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
417:
408:
407:
406:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
376:
374:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
344:
338:
337:
336:
335:
331:
323:
319:
315:
311:
306:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
294:
289:
285:
281:
280:
271:
269:
268:
264:
260:
252:
248:
244:
240:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
211:
206:
199:
196:
194:
193:
189:
185:
176:
174:
173:
169:
165:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
122:
120:
119:
116:
111:
108:
104:
102:
96:
88:
87:
83:
79:
71:
67:
63:
56:
53:
51:
48:
46:
43:
41:
38:
36:
33:
31:
28:
27:
26:
24:
19:
18:
902:
878:
872:
849:
841:
839:
805:
799:
776:
768:
766:
704:
647:
641:
639:
636:Beck sources
578:— Preceding
565:
546:
492:
454:
413:
380:
348:
327:
291:
277:
275:
257:Thanks :) --
256:
208:
202:
180:
177:Noelle North
161:
126:
112:
109:
105:
97:
95:Hey, Candy!
94:
59:
20:
16:
15:
880:voting page
807:voting page
549:WesleyDodds
496:—Preceding
459:—Preceding
421:—Preceding
384:—Preceding
352:—Preceding
864:topic bans
791:topic bans
725:topic bans
584:Infinifilm
569:Infinifilm
536:OK, sorry.
279:Daily Mail
184:Longchenpa
78:deeptrivia
74:{{helpme}}
62:Wikipedian
40:Help pages
860:site bans
787:site bans
721:site bans
685:Thardin12
654:Thardin12
276:Not sure
164:Redrocket
64:! Please
649:LA Times
592:contribs
580:unsigned
510:contribs
498:unsigned
473:contribs
461:unsigned
435:contribs
423:unsigned
398:contribs
386:unsigned
366:contribs
354:unsigned
45:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
502:GrantyO
465:GrantyO
427:GrantyO
390:GrantyO
377:Thanks.
358:GrantyO
334:GrantyO
23:welcome
711:. The
345:hmm...
670:Candy
620:Candy
606:Candy
524:Candy
489:&
310:Candy
288:WP:RS
284:WP:RS
239:Candy
144:Candy
123:Loser
889:talk
850:The
816:talk
777:The
745:talk
689:talk
674:talk
658:talk
624:talk
610:talk
588:talk
573:talk
553:talk
543:Beck
528:talk
506:talk
469:talk
431:talk
394:talk
362:talk
324:Hey!
314:talk
298:talk
293:Cirt
263:talk
243:talk
224:The
215:talk
210:Cirt
188:talk
168:talk
148:talk
133:talk
82:talk
705:Hi,
228:on
129:BGC
891:)
883:.
862:,
818:)
810:.
789:,
747:)
723:,
691:)
676:)
660:)
626:)
612:)
594:)
590:•
555:)
530:)
512:)
508:•
475:)
471:•
437:)
433:•
400:)
396:•
368:)
364:•
316:)
300:)
265:)
245:)
217:)
190:)
170:)
150:)
135:)
113:--
103:.
84:)
887:(
814:(
743:(
687:(
672:(
656:(
622:(
608:(
586:(
571:(
551:(
526:(
504:(
467:(
429:(
392:(
360:(
312:(
296:(
261:(
241:(
213:(
186:(
166:(
146:(
131:(
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.