Knowledge

User talk:Mohanbhan/Archive 3

Source šŸ“

265: 31: 198:
1)"... a representation is made and a final decision was taken as aforesaid, Banjara and Vanjari shall be treated as synonyms of each other and the confidential circular dated 5th March 1986 shall not be acted upon..." you quoted this from State Of Maharashtra And Ors. vs Ganpat Pandurang Sankhe And
125:
I agree that I may have acted a bit hastily, and I am sorry about it. But Sitush I wish you were a little less acrimonious, and a little more understanding, with your edits and reverts. I know that "colonial sources" are regarded as unreliable on WP, and respecting that, I added a link to the
126:
external links section which is very much within WP policy. So when you removed it, I reinstated it by saying it was a document of historical and archival interest -- though I now feel I should have stated WP policy on EL which would have brought the matter to a close. -
331: 223:
so I am reverting the changes in good faith... u can discuss on this issue and if you are still not ok with it you are free to merge. I am here only to make information available to those who love wiki thank you
187:@mohanbhan I know you merged page in good faith. But before you did that you should have talked with me. ok. I see you are not satisfied with Maharashtra Gazetteer. ok its fine I will try to explain my point 107:. You've been around for a long time now and should thus also be familiar with the various special regimes that apply to articles related to India etc, which make actions such as yours problematic. 332:
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=4bfmnmsBfQ4C&pg=PA2020&dq=%22Vanjari%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6-L_ejNvaAhWIPI8KHS7mBKEQ6AEIJTAA#v=onepage&q=%22Vanjari%22&f=false
211:
4) Finally we are talking about the community having a strong presence in Maharashtra. If we can have page upon small groups of people Vanjari community deserve a separate article.
217:
6) and if you have problems with sources of the article you are free to modify it and make the good article .. but don't just merge it with another totally different article ok
208:
3) In the conclusion the committee reported that Banjaras and vanjari are not in synonymous. (page number 83 see conclusion)(please take a time and look into it)
199:
Anr. on 24 July 1991 judgement. But in that same judgement, its said that a committee should be made to look into this problem.
298: 293: 64: 59: 158:
Because the issue is being discussed on the talk page and WP policy permits linking to archival material under EL. -
272: 38: 97: 149: 281: 251: 229: 163: 131: 47: 17: 214:
5) And Vanjari Community also have very strong religious and political presence in Maharashtra.
115: 145: 247: 225: 159: 127: 85: 320: 255: 233: 167: 153: 135: 119: 205:
2) A committee is formed under DC Wadhva who submitted a report in 1993. (source)
280:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
111: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
140:
Why you are not making a self-revert if you are really "sorry" or you "
89: 241:
andsome more ref for you about vanjari caste = 1) people ind india
259: 25: 141: 104: 93: 92:. You know it because you actually cite it yourself in 321:http://dspace.gipe.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10973/13771 8: 110:What is it that you do not understand? - 313: 278:Do not edit the contents of this page. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7: 84:You know that you are in breach of 96:after also being told about it by 24: 263: 29: 1: 350: 256:18:40, 27 April 2018 (UTC) 234:17:32, 27 April 2018 (UTC) 168:02:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC) 154:16:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC) 136:12:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC) 120:06:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC) 276:of past discussions. 42:of past discussions. 18:User talk:Mohanbhan 311: 310: 288: 287: 282:current talk page 94:your edit summary 77: 76: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 341: 334: 329: 323: 318: 307: 290: 289: 267: 266: 260: 144:" your actions? 98:MBlaze Lightning 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 349: 348: 344: 343: 342: 340: 339: 338: 337: 330: 326: 319: 315: 303: 264: 82: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 347: 345: 336: 335: 324: 312: 309: 308: 301: 296: 286: 285: 268: 245: 244: 243: 242: 221: 220: 219: 218: 215: 212: 209: 206: 196: 195: 194: 193: 185: 184: 183: 182: 180: 175: 174: 173: 172: 171: 170: 81: 78: 75: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 346: 333: 328: 325: 322: 317: 314: 306: 302: 300: 297: 295: 292: 291: 283: 279: 275: 274: 269: 262: 261: 258: 257: 253: 249: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 231: 227: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 203: 202: 201: 200: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 181: 179: 178: 177: 176: 169: 165: 161: 157: 156: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 138: 137: 133: 129: 124: 123: 122: 121: 117: 113: 108: 106: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 79: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 327: 316: 304: 277: 271: 246: 222: 197: 186: 109: 105:edit summary 101: 83: 70: 43: 37: 270:This is an 36:This is an 146:Capitals00 305:ArchiveĀ 3 299:ArchiveĀ 2 294:ArchiveĀ 1 248:India1277 226:India1277 160:Mohanbhan 128:Mohanbhan 71:ArchiveĀ 3 65:ArchiveĀ 2 60:ArchiveĀ 1 273:archive 90:Banjara 80:Banjara 39:archive 142:regret 112:Sitush 86:WP:BRD 102:their 16:< 252:talk 230:talk 164:talk 150:talk 132:talk 116:talk 100:in 88:at 254:) 232:) 166:) 152:) 134:) 118:) 284:. 250:( 228:( 162:( 148:( 130:( 114:( 50:.

Index

User talk:Mohanbhan
archive
current talk page
ArchiveĀ 1
ArchiveĀ 2
ArchiveĀ 3
WP:BRD
Banjara
your edit summary
MBlaze Lightning
edit summary
Sitush
talk
06:51, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Mohanbhan
talk
12:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
regret
Capitals00
talk
16:20, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Mohanbhan
talk
02:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
India1277
talk
17:32, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
India1277
talk
18:40, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘