949:, which also includes some lists of pages that might need some work done on them. Finding and making small improvements is a great way to learn how editing works. There's quite a lot to it, so taking it slow is often a good idea early on. Let's see, what else... carry on using edit summaries, which you have been doing. If you find yourself arguing with someone by editing an article back and forth, stop and go to the talk page for the article instead. That's probably enough for now! I hope you enjoy it here. ›
2053:
1933:
slightly more sense understanding the mechanism through which that came about. If it's not too much trouble, could I ask you not to template me again, at least not without checking if your template actually applies to the situation? I'm not that active on
Knowledge (XXG) so it'll probably be a while before we bump into one another again, and I used to appreciate a lot of your interventions in the 'behind the scenes' pages. I hope next time we get on better. ›
22:
202:
1960:
1346:
827:
1078:, thanks for looking out for problems like this. There's no need to categorize bad edits. You can just undo them and explain why in your edit summary. One way is to go to the history of the page and click "undo" on the revision. It's also good that you're thinking about how best to warn/talk to people who do something like this. There's a table of templates you can use at
405:
again. If it fails again I'm afraid that will be the end of it, and IMO, this is an important topic that should be amongst WP's best. It needs a source review - someone willing to randomly check sources to be sure they actually say what the text says. There are too many for anyone to do alone, but doing any at all, even just one, would be deeply appreciated. Post it
129:, I'm well, thank you. While I was looking at it, another editor has gone ahead with a merger. I agree that your article was the cleaner of the two, and I think the new version is an improvement. Since it's a very recent event, there'll probably be more coverage and other editors getting involved, so if you want me to take another look later, I'm happy to. Best, ›
1804:
640:! Many thanks again. Still have a list of improvements to be made and please do make any amendments you like. I'll be nominating it for DYK shortly as well; thinking the inspiration by a fever dream is probably the most obvious "hook" but please feel free to contribute/suggest better. Definitely going to pick this up for a re-read once I've finished
328:
256:
1089:
The general rule is to start out with a level 1 warning and go up from there—if they've received a level-1 warning recently, given them a level-2. There are also somewhat gentler templates for new users who haven't been spoken to before at all. For this case, which is clearly a bad edit from a new IP
1019:
thanks for the nudge. I've added an image now. Could you please review the fair use rationale I gave? One issue I was concerned about was initial publication. I don't know which of the images were included in actual book publications rather than simply being published online. Also, now I've added the
765:
when this type of thing happens. It's possible in some cases that the question might be one that someone else might have and the replies given might prove to be useful. It's also possible that someone (another host perhaps) may have a different take on things and provide an alternative answer. Unless
513:
on Jimbo Wales's talk page, which functions as kind of a general internal discussion board for
Knowledge (XXG). Perhaps that will lead a few more editors to give their answers. Once a question at the Teahouse looks like it's been responded to, people are less likely to read it in full, so this seemed
1113:
There's nothing particularly formal about any of this, so don't worry too much about picking the wrong template, but do only use templates to warn people when it's quite clear they've done something wrong (as in this case). If it's ambiguous, it's probably better to talk to them directly or let your
404:
up for FA and then left WP for almost two years, and it got archived. I returned recently and renominated it about a month ago, and this time it is getting little response. I am putting out a call to everyone I know because the coordinator has said if it doesn't get more interest he will archive it
1912:
I didn't re-revert anything. I changed a double space into a single space in order to allow me to leave an edit summary. I didn't reverse your change, and I left an edit summary rather than starting a full discussion, because I don't think this piece of wording is that important. I've made my views
791:
that it was better to allow them to just retract the question. That's partly because, especially given the context of their user talk page edits, I didn't think it was fully coherent, so no-one else was likely to have quite the same question or benefit from however an extended discussion might have
467:
Mortee, Thank you for your input. I would really appreciate your help bringing in some more responses. I don't need anything too specific for the project. I just need a few good quotes from each respondent about the appeal and value of wikipedia. The personal questions are just to establish who the
1932:
I see this is a custom template you've substituted in, which is why it looks like you spent far more time writing your message than looking at what you were responding to. Reverting a totally neutral edit with a such a shouty summary and posting this high-handed message is irritating, but it makes
1167:
who is kinda starting to get on my nerves(by how much vandalism he does) I can’t believe no one has found out about him(to my knowledge) and although some of his edits make me laugh a little, the rest just irritate me. Anyway, I need help because I don’t know what to do. Should I give him a big
2112:
The
Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please
588:. Your draft is much more advanced/useful. I wondered if you'd mind if I picked up the content, added in more details and published the page? Or would you prefer to pick up your draft again, in which case I'd be happy to add bits and pieces once it's in mainspace? Just let me know. Cheers,
2089:
428:. I'm glad to hear you're back here. I can't help with this, I'm afraid. The sources are mostly books and I don't have access to a library. I hope your article gets attention from people better placed to serve it and that you stick around regardless. All the best ›
228:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
2092:
1218:
By the way, normally when you reply on talk pages, you indent. It doesn't make much difference when it's just the two of us but it can be useful when there's a few people talking, to see who's replying to whom. I think it's all explained at
1242:
Alright. I realized that I didn’t see their talk page last night, so what i said is pretty incorrect. So sorry about that, but i think that i will watch them in the future to see if they continue. I really appreciate your help! Thank you,
1020:
image, I'm not sure what the most elegant way of linking to the whole gallery is, whether with the
External gallery template, a link in the image caption, or back to External links. Thank you again for the review and encouragement. ›
1913:
clearly known enough and the article is the way you want it. I'm very happy to leave it there. There's really no need to start talking about edit warring, disruptive editing etc. I haven't done what you seem to think I've done. ›
1195:(the main place to report a burst of repeated vandalism from one source), it should normally be after a "final warning". So I don't suggest asking for a block, but you could keep an eye on them if you want, in case they carry on.
271:
343:
2005:
1190:
they've been warned a lot of times over the last few months. They were blocked once last June. I don't think you're the first to see the issue (sorry!). The most recent warning is level-2 though. If you're going to
232:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
406:
1522:
Hello. Yes. I knew about the Kings Beach
Complex, and thought that this page was on Knowledge (XXG), but it was only a draft, so I thought i could help the page become an official page, and not just a draft.
1257:
Hey, on my watchlist page it says “a request for adminship is open for discussion”. Do you by any chance know what this means? Ive been reading the link that it sent me to, but i am confused. Appreciate it,
1719:
Can you help me please? Heironymous Rowe keeps on giving me a hard time. How do I handle that and should I report it, bc it’s getting out of hand with him. (I’m asking bc you’ve been here for a few years)
444:
Thank you for the good wishes. The library we all check is online. It's google books and WP has its own library. I will be around for at least this year. And don't worry about the FAC. It'll work out.
1989:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
755:
Hi Mortee. I won't re-add the question and your response, but generally it's better simply let the post die a natural death through archiving or to simply close the discussion using a template like
2060:
96:. I believe the first article lacks sources and is biased while mine is a little more objective and should be the main article. I made an edit on the talk page where I state why my article should
1599:
Hopefully that situation won't arise (assuming of course that you aren't). Blocks for sockpuppetry seem particularly opaque and hard to contest so I don't have any advice to offer you upfront. ›
607:
thanks very much for getting in touch. You're very welcome to take anything that's useful from my draft. I haven't worked on it in ages. I'll look forward to seeing a page finally published! ›
378:
above, these can be deleted and I've replied to say so in the discussion itself. They came about from moving articles with subtly bad titles to better places but the redirects have no value. ›
1114:
edit summary speak for itself (which you can do anyway; using warnings/welcomes isn't compulsory, though it can be useful). I hope this helps you. Let me know if you have other questions! ›
1974:
802:
their own question they were also removing my reply - I felt I had discretion to give permission. I appreciate the message and I'll bear it in mind if something like this comes up again. ›
1542:. If that's so then all should be well. It's all about the ANI discussion at this point. If that all blows over and you're still here, please do ask again either on my talk page or at the
1653:
I'm not trying to take sides. I have no role in figuring out whether someone's an alternative account of someone else, and I'm not an admin so I have nothing to do with any blocks. ›
2106:
1894:. Please take the opportunity to make your views known there. It is best not to restore the material you added until there is a consensus among the editors there to do so. Thanks,
1670:
Oh, I see. I feel intimidated by
Heironymous Rowe tbh. This is not how I wanted to start Knowledge (XXG)... I just came here to make Knowledge (XXG) better, that’s all. I promise.
1042:
I found my very first opportunity to fix vandalism, but i don’t know how to categorize it and/or give a warning to the user. Wold you mind helping me? Here’s the link to the page,
872:
1082:. It includes a bewildering array of options but anything that seems close is likely to have the kind of wording you want. Some people, myself included, also use tools like
712:
Hi, I want to thankyou for creating this
Disambiguation page. I hope you will try to make all links blue soon as blue is my favourite colour (Just Joking). Have a good day.
1385:
2114:
1780:, yes, I'd say so. I didn't realise I needed to do anything to prompt it getting closed. Thank you for the nudge! I'll look up what needs to be done and get it sorted. ›
1168:
warning, should I make a ban request or should I report him and undo all of his edits(of which most have never been undone except for some that I fixed)? Thanks again,
552:
you're extremely welcome. All the best for the project! If you ever feel like doing some editing yourself and have questions, I'd be happy to help if I at all can. ›
225:
1079:
1286:
1688:
I'm sorry to hear that. Like I said above, once the ANI conversation is over, I'd be very happy to help you out with learning the ropes. Get back to me then. ›
509:
now. I enjoyed thinking through the questions and writing the answers. I hope you find them useful. I hope it's OK that I've also posted a link to the survey
482:
For context, this is the post on the teahouse
Knowledge (XXG):Teahouse#Very broad questions about Knowledge (XXG) and about your experience as Wikipedians.
214:
2105:
This is a reminder that the voting period for the
Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the
766:
the question or responses contain some pretty serious policy violations, it's probably best to just let it be archived once anyone has answered it. --
1202:
like most of them were reverted, but if you think they've caused problems that are still there in the articles of course you can try to fix them. ›
1400:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to
887:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to
834:
938:
1353:
1199:
502:
534:, Thank you so much! Your answers are very very helpful. This is exactly what I was looking for! I really appreciate your help and guidance!
321:
249:
2028:
1094:
1401:
888:
283:
585:
361:
1002:
263:
1281:
so the community is asking them questions and deciding whether or not that should happen. The page about requests for adminship is
1220:
335:
1482:(whatever that might be). Sorry not to be of more help. I continue to think it's perfectly good as a reference for these facts. ›
1404:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
891:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
577:
2024:
1104:
986:
93:
71:
1998:
1861:
729:
1890:
To help move things along, I have started a discussion on the article talk page about the disputed edit, which you will find
1379:
1014:
998:
101:
946:
584:
by
Elizabeth Knox. It's still very much in the early stages, and whilst looking for some other links, I happened across
218:
2010:
1856:
iscuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to
1405:
1391:
892:
878:
174:. There should be a link at the top to ask your question. Welcome to Knowledge (XXG) - I hope you enjoy it here. ›
45:
40:
1478:. I haven't been able to find any more about this one, except, as the Encylopedia.com page itself says, it's from
1187:
55:
695:
1986:
89:
75:
1899:
1850:
everted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to
1800:, I was just reading the instructions but it looks like it was closed after you posted but before I read it
1388:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
1311:
1263:
1248:
1173:
1136:
1064:
1059:
It was changed back before i could do so, but could you please give me some more tips for future reference?
1050:
875:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
759:
302:
and the same rationale applies to any others of the same sort you come across. Thanks for tidying these. ›
2073:
1828:
1877:
1865:
1503:
1441:
1358:
945:
is a great place for asking questions about editing as they come up. Another really helpful link is the
839:
510:
156:
115:
1543:
942:
171:
1370:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
851:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
923:
649:
628:
593:
506:
450:
414:
1968:
1083:
1868:, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why
1725:
1710:
1675:
1640:
1621:
1582:
1568:
1528:
856:
846:
771:
637:
357:
1982:
1869:
1929:
1909:
1895:
1758:
1307:
1274:
1259:
1244:
1183:
1169:
1132:
1075:
1060:
1046:
904:
539:
487:
473:
401:
61:
2052:
1278:
736:
701:
2069:
1766:
1418:
279:
238:
1994:
1884:
792:
gone. Your reinstating it was understandable, but since the reason you gave for doing so was
2126:
2017:
1499:
1475:
1453:
1437:
1374:
1365:
972:
167:
152:
126:
111:
57:
21:
1997:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1990:
1835:
1282:
1192:
994:
793:
705:
400:
I hate to put you on the spot, I know it's been a long time, but I am in real need. I put
2120:
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
1433:
934:
919:
743:
660:
645:
624:
604:
589:
446:
425:
410:
1857:
1834:
Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about
2102:
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
247:
1864:
which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching
1721:
1706:
1685:
1671:
1650:
1636:
1617:
1594:
1578:
1564:
1539:
1524:
975:, adding a fair-use image is not too hard, there are just a few things to be aware of:
862:
782:
767:
369:
347:
319:
1635:
Why are you taking Heironymous Rowe’s side? I checked out the convo on his talkpage.
900:
549:
535:
498:
483:
469:
209:
193:
1735:
That's not something I can do, I'm afraid. You'll need to appeal the block first. ›
1164:
1883:
Please remember that as the person attempting to make a change to the article, the
1797:
1777:
1762:
1414:
375:
291:
275:
234:
1959:
1891:
1436:
to have a ref for date of birth and part of the Early life and education section.
468:
quote is coming from and the other questions are mostly out of personal interest.
1934:
1914:
1872:. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the
1809:
1781:
1736:
1689:
1654:
1600:
1547:
1483:
1459:
1345:
1322:
1290:
1224:
1203:
1147:
1115:
1021:
950:
826:
803:
666:
608:
553:
531:
515:
429:
379:
303:
175:
130:
1086:
which make it easy to post these and also pick out the most commonly used ones.
1395:
882:
88:
There are currently two articles on the Bareum mosque shooting in Norway. Its
2090:
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.
1100:
personally. If they were logged in but hadn't been spoken to, I'd have used
1043:
866:
1887:
is on you to justify the change, and to get a consensus if it is disputed.
908:
597:
514:
to me to be a reasonable way of drawing attention to it. All the best, ›
2001:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
327:
255:
1978:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
59:
2129:
2077:
2032:
1944:
1924:
1903:
1819:
1791:
1770:
1761:
maybe be wrapped up now? Are you familiar with doing this? Thanks,
1746:
1729:
1714:
1699:
1679:
1664:
1644:
1625:
1610:
1586:
1572:
1557:
1532:
1507:
1493:
1469:
1445:
1422:
1332:
1315:
1300:
1267:
1252:
1234:
1213:
1177:
1157:
1140:
1125:
1068:
1054:
1031:
1006:
960:
927:
813:
775:
745:
676:
653:
632:
618:
563:
543:
525:
491:
477:
454:
439:
418:
389:
313:
242:
185:
160:
140:
119:
623:
Brilliant, thank you! I'll let you know once it's up. :) Cheers,
2014:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1165:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/180.150.124.123
2004:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
1972:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
1870:
communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential
941:
so you'll have encountered some of the main policies already.
62:
15:
1131:
Thanks for the tips and help! I’ll try to keep this in mind.
576:
Hello Mortee, I hope you're well. I've very recently started
334:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
262:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
1498:
Thanks for looking . Will see what the AfC reviewer thinks.
326:
254:
248:"First А Women's Basketball League of Montenegro" listed at
1458:
I'll take a look tomorrow but I'd be confident it's fine ›
982:
Upload directly to English Knowledge (XXG), not to Commons.
1577:
What if I get blocked even tho I’m not the user Epictrex?
320:"2009–10 Women's А Basketball League of Serbia" listed at
213:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
979:
Only upload one image, at low resolution (usually 220px).
1277:, it means that someone has been nominated to become an
1044:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/1021662688
85:. How are you? I'd like to ask you for some assistance.
2083:
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
1985:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
798:
787:
298:
207:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1163:
Actually, I have another question. There is this guy:
1876:
until the consensus as to what to do is reached (see
1384:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
873:
Template:Did you know nominations/The Vintner's Luck
871:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
2059:
721:
717:
226:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Darren Grimes
102:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Bærum_mosque_shooting
2109:to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
1386:Template:Did you know nominations/Sakubei Yamamoto
1223:but I can't pretend to have read them recently. ›
1080:Knowledge (XXG):Template index/User talk namespace
716:To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with
937:, sure! I see you've already been going through
710:
687:I have sent you a note about a page you started
268:First А Women's Basketball League of Montenegro
264:First А Women's Basketball League of Montenegro
1808:Thanks again for the message. See you round ›
704:, while examining this page as a part of our
340:2009–10 Women's А Basketball League of Serbia
336:2009–10 Women's А Basketball League of Serbia
8:
2045:
1306:Yes, it does. Thanks a lot for helping out,
853:... that the inspiration for the 1998 novel
1631:Why are you taking Heironymous Rowe’s sides
1372:... that the art and diaries of coal miner
342:redirect, you might want to participate in
270:redirect, you might want to participate in
100:be fused with the previous. Talk page here
2051:
2044:
720:. Please remember to sign your reply with
338:. Since you had some involvement with the
266:. Since you had some involvement with the
2093:Please help translate to other languages.
1362:was updated with a fact from the article
843:was updated with a fact from the article
215:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
665:brilliant! Nice job with the article. ›
1378:were Japan's first entry on the UNESCO
918:Thank you! Any tips for a new editor?
1546:about other editing. All the best, ›
7:
2123:On behalf of the UCoC project team,
1969:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
1801:
1987:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1953:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
1285:and the current open nomination is
1198:As for undoing all their edits, it
1321:Any time, good to hear from you ›
14:
1759:Talk:Jessica_Yaniv#Proposal_(RfC)
1432:I am using it as a reference for
732:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
296:thanks for letting me know. I've
224:The article will be discussed at
1958:
1802:
1344:
1146:You're very welcome! Any time ›
825:
463:Help with Knowledge (XXG) survey
200:
20:
2008:and submit your choices on the
987:Template:Non-free use rationale
94:Al-Noor Islamic Center shooting
72:Al-Noor Islamic Center shooting
708:, had the following comments:
151:How do you open the Teahouse?
92:and an article I wrote titled
1:
2033:00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
939:The Knowledge (XXG) Adventure
564:18:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
544:18:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
526:18:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
492:02:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
478:02:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
455:04:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
440:02:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
419:19:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
186:07:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
161:07:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
147:How do you open the Teahouse?
1945:23:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1925:23:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1904:23:36, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
1380:Memory of the World Register
971:Regarding our discussion on
586:your draft from January 2018
374:thanks. As with my reply to
243:19:44, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
1095:welcome-anon-unconstructive
914:Thanks for thanking my post
865:in a fever dream caused by
728:(Message delivered via the
390:23:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
362:19:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
314:14:17, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
284:13:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
141:14:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
120:13:28, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
2145:
2025:MediaWiki message delivery
1032:13:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
1007:03:37, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
961:18:51, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
928:18:39, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
909:12:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
820:DYK for The Vintner's Luck
814:00:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
776:00:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
746:05:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
633:18:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
619:17:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
598:14:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
2078:08:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
2050:
751:Teahouse question removal
677:14:10, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
654:08:50, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
409:. Please help if you can.
2107:voting page on Meta-wiki
2022:to your user talk page.
1820:20:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
1792:14:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
1771:14:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
1747:03:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1730:03:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1715:02:19, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1700:02:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1680:02:07, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1665:02:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1645:01:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1626:01:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1611:01:58, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1587:01:53, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1573:01:50, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1558:01:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1533:01:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1508:19:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1494:19:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1470:02:47, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1446:01:19, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
1339:DYK for Sakubei Yamamoto
1333:12:32, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
1316:12:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
1301:06:40, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
1268:00:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
1090:user, I would have used
1015:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)
999:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH)
696:Mahatma Gandhi Institute
322:Redirects for discussion
250:Redirects for discussion
217:or whether it should be
2130:23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
1423:12:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
1253:14:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
1235:01:40, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
1221:WP:Talk page guidelines
1214:01:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
1178:01:29, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
1158:01:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
1141:01:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
1126:01:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
1069:23:57, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
1055:23:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
993:More information is at
694:Thank you for creating
346:if you wish to do so.
344:the redirect discussion
274:if you wish to do so.
272:the redirect discussion
2115:review the U4C Charter
1829:The Dick Van Dyke Show
1406:Did you know talk page
1105:welcome-unconstructive
893:Did you know talk page
714:
396:Help if you can please
331:
259:
1983:Arbitration Committee
1966:Hello! Voting in the
706:page curation process
330:
258:
90:Bærum mosque shooting
76:Bærum mosque shooting
2041:Precious anniversary
1705:Thank you! Perfect!
1563:Thank you good sir!
1480:Contemporary Authors
1289:. Hope this helps ›
819:
569:
2047:
1862:disruptive activity
1402:the statistics page
889:the statistics page
107:What do you think?
1999:arbitration policy
1844:old edit has been
883:The Vintner's Luck
857:The Vintner's Luck
847:The Vintner's Luck
582:The Vintner's Luck
402:Biblical criticism
332:
260:
2099:Dear Wikimedian,
2066:
2065:
2035:
1399:
1186:well, looking at
989:on the file page.
886:
733:
642:The Absolute Book
578:a userspace draft
170:, here's a link:
68:
67:
2136:
2055:
2048:
2023:
2021:
1962:
1937:
1917:
1812:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1784:
1739:
1692:
1657:
1603:
1598:
1550:
1486:
1462:
1457:
1428:Encyclopedia.com
1396:Sakubei Yamamoto
1389:
1375:Sakubei Yamamoto
1366:Sakubei Yamamoto
1348:
1325:
1293:
1227:
1206:
1150:
1118:
1109:
1103:
1099:
1093:
1024:
1018:
973:Sakubei Yamamoto
953:
947:Community portal
876:
829:
806:
801:
790:
764:
758:
741:
727:
723:
719:
669:
664:
611:
556:
518:
432:
382:
373:
354:
306:
301:
295:
204:
203:
178:
133:
83:User talk:Mortee
63:
24:
16:
2144:
2143:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2085:
2043:
2038:
2037:
2015:
1963:
1955:
1942:
1935:
1922:
1915:
1874:status quo ante
1832:
1817:
1810:
1803:
1789:
1782:
1755:
1744:
1737:
1697:
1690:
1662:
1655:
1633:
1608:
1601:
1592:
1555:
1548:
1520:
1491:
1484:
1467:
1460:
1451:
1434:Draft:Dora Apel
1430:
1411:
1410:
1349:
1341:
1330:
1323:
1298:
1291:
1232:
1225:
1211:
1204:
1188:their talk page
1155:
1148:
1123:
1116:
1107:
1101:
1097:
1091:
1040:
1029:
1022:
1012:
969:
967:Fair use images
958:
951:
916:
898:
897:
861:came to author
830:
822:
811:
804:
797:
796:- i.e. that by
786:
762:
756:
753:
737:
689:
674:
667:
658:
616:
609:
574:
561:
554:
523:
516:
465:
437:
430:
398:
387:
380:
367:
348:
325:
311:
304:
297:
289:
253:
205:
201:
198:
183:
176:
149:
138:
131:
79:
64:
58:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2142:
2140:
2097:
2096:
2084:
2081:
2064:
2063:
2057:
2056:
2042:
2039:
2006:the candidates
1975:eligible users
1964:
1957:
1956:
1954:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1940:
1920:
1831:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1823:
1822:
1815:
1787:
1754:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1742:
1703:
1702:
1695:
1668:
1667:
1660:
1632:
1629:
1614:
1613:
1606:
1561:
1560:
1553:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1489:
1465:
1429:
1426:
1350:
1343:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1328:
1304:
1303:
1296:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1230:
1209:
1196:
1161:
1160:
1153:
1129:
1128:
1121:
1111:
1087:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1027:
991:
990:
983:
980:
968:
965:
964:
963:
956:
915:
912:
863:Elizabeth Knox
831:
824:
823:
821:
818:
817:
816:
809:
760:Discussion top
752:
749:
691:Hello, Mortee
688:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
672:
635:
614:
573:
571:Vintner's Luck
568:
567:
566:
559:
529:
528:
521:
501:, I've posted
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
435:
397:
394:
393:
392:
385:
324:
318:
317:
316:
309:
252:
246:
199:
197:
192:Nomination of
190:
189:
188:
181:
148:
145:
144:
143:
136:
78:
69:
66:
65:
60:
56:
54:
51:
50:
49:
48:
43:
35:
34:
31:
30:
25:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2141:
2132:
2131:
2128:
2124:
2121:
2118:
2116:
2110:
2108:
2103:
2100:
2095:
2094:
2091:
2087:
2086:
2082:
2080:
2079:
2075:
2071:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2049:
2040:
2036:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2019:
2013:
2012:
2007:
2002:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1979:
1977:
1976:
1971:
1970:
1961:
1952:
1946:
1943:
1938:
1931:
1930:Beyond My Ken
1928:
1927:
1926:
1923:
1918:
1911:
1910:Beyond My Ken
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1901:
1897:
1896:Beyond My Ken
1893:
1888:
1886:
1881:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1854:
1849:
1848:
1843:
1842:
1838:. When your
1837:
1830:
1827:
1821:
1818:
1813:
1799:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1790:
1785:
1779:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1740:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1717:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1701:
1698:
1693:
1687:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1666:
1663:
1658:
1652:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1630:
1628:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1612:
1609:
1604:
1596:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1575:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1559:
1556:
1551:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1517:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1492:
1487:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1468:
1463:
1455:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1427:
1425:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1409:
1407:
1403:
1397:
1393:
1387:
1383:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1361:
1360:
1355:
1347:
1338:
1334:
1331:
1326:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1308:RecRoomBoy537
1302:
1299:
1294:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1275:RecRoomBoy537
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1265:
1261:
1260:RecRoomBoy537
1255:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1245:RecRoomBoy537
1236:
1233:
1228:
1222:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1212:
1207:
1201:
1197:
1194:
1189:
1185:
1184:RecRoomBoy537
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1170:RecRoomBoy537
1166:
1159:
1156:
1151:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1133:RecRoomBoy537
1127:
1124:
1119:
1112:
1106:
1096:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1076:RecRoomBoy537
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:RecRoomBoy537
1057:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:RecRoomBoy537
1045:
1037:
1033:
1030:
1025:
1016:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
988:
984:
981:
978:
977:
976:
974:
966:
962:
959:
954:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
931:
930:
929:
925:
921:
913:
911:
910:
906:
902:
896:
894:
890:
884:
880:
874:
870:
868:
864:
859:
858:
854:
850:
849:
848:
842:
841:
836:
835:27 April 2021
828:
815:
812:
807:
800:
795:
789:
784:
780:
779:
778:
777:
773:
769:
761:
750:
748:
747:
744:
742:
740:
734:
731:
730:Page Curation
725:
713:
709:
707:
703:
699:
697:
692:
686:
678:
675:
670:
662:
657:
656:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
636:
634:
630:
626:
622:
621:
620:
617:
612:
606:
602:
601:
600:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
579:
572:
565:
562:
557:
551:
548:
547:
546:
545:
541:
537:
533:
527:
524:
519:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
495:
494:
493:
489:
485:
480:
479:
475:
471:
462:
456:
452:
448:
443:
442:
441:
438:
433:
427:
423:
422:
421:
420:
416:
412:
408:
403:
395:
391:
388:
383:
377:
371:
366:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
353:
352:
345:
341:
337:
329:
323:
315:
312:
307:
300:
299:!voted delete
293:
288:
287:
286:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
257:
251:
245:
244:
240:
236:
230:
227:
222:
220:
216:
212:
211:
210:Darren Grimes
195:
194:Darren Grimes
191:
187:
184:
179:
173:
169:
165:
164:
163:
162:
158:
154:
146:
142:
139:
134:
128:
124:
123:
122:
121:
117:
113:
108:
105:
103:
99:
95:
91:
86:
84:
77:
73:
70:
53:
52:
47:
44:
42:
39:
38:
37:
36:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
2127:RamzyM (WMF)
2125:
2122:
2119:
2111:
2104:
2101:
2098:
2088:
2070:Gerda Arendt
2067:
2061:Seven years!
2009:
2003:
1980:
1973:
1967:
1965:
1939:
1919:
1889:
1882:
1878:WP:STATUSQUO
1873:
1858:edit warring
1852:
1851:
1846:
1845:
1840:
1839:
1833:
1814:
1786:
1756:
1741:
1718:
1704:
1694:
1669:
1659:
1634:
1615:
1605:
1576:
1562:
1552:
1521:
1488:
1479:
1464:
1431:
1412:
1373:
1371:
1364:
1363:
1359:Did you know
1357:
1351:
1327:
1305:
1295:
1256:
1241:
1229:
1208:
1162:
1152:
1130:
1120:
1058:
1041:
1026:
992:
970:
955:
943:The Teahouse
917:
899:
860:
855:
852:
845:
844:
840:Did you know
838:
832:
808:
788:in this case
754:
738:
735:
726:
718:{{Re|Iflaq}}
715:
711:
700:
693:
690:
671:
641:
613:
581:
575:
570:
558:
530:
520:
481:
466:
434:
399:
384:
350:
349:
339:
333:
308:
267:
261:
231:
223:
208:
206:
196:for deletion
180:
150:
135:
109:
106:
97:
87:
82:
80:
26:
2011:voting page
1757:Should the
1500:David notMD
1476:David notMD
1454:David notMD
1438:David notMD
1200:looks to me
1038:Hey Mortee,
507:your survey
503:my response
172:WP:TEAHOUSE
168:KirbyKomics
153:KirbyKomics
127:Albert Falk
112:Albert Falk
1995:topic bans
1392:here's how
1354:9 May 2021
935:HiCooldude
920:HiCooldude
879:here's how
702:User:Iflaq
661:Chocmilk03
646:Chocmilk03
644:. Cheers,
625:Chocmilk03
605:Chocmilk03
590:Chocmilk03
447:Jenhawk777
426:Jenhawk777
411:Jenhawk777
1991:site bans
1866:consensus
1796:Hi again
1753:Yaniv RfC
1722:Rui Beech
1707:Rui Beech
1686:Rui Beech
1672:Rui Beech
1651:Rui Beech
1637:Rui Beech
1618:Rui Beech
1595:Rui Beech
1579:Rui Beech
1565:Rui Beech
1540:Rui Beech
1525:Rui Beech
1474:Hi again
985:Fill out
901:—valereee
867:pneumonia
785:. I felt
783:Marchjuly
768:Marchjuly
638:Published
370:Steel1943
351:Steel1943
41:2016–2017
2046:Precious
1544:Teahouse
799:removing
550:Timbktoo
536:Timbktoo
499:Timbktoo
484:Timbktoo
470:Timbktoo
27:Archives
2018:NoACEMM
1885:WP:ONUS
1798:CatCafe
1778:CatCafe
1763:CatCafe
1415:Amakuru
1084:Twinkle
376:Pkbwcgs
292:Pkbwcgs
276:Pkbwcgs
235:Bearcat
219:deleted
1936:Mortee
1916:Mortee
1836:WP:BRD
1811:Mortee
1783:Mortee
1738:Mortee
1691:Mortee
1656:Mortee
1602:Mortee
1549:Mortee
1485:Mortee
1461:Mortee
1324:Mortee
1292:Mortee
1226:Mortee
1205:Mortee
1193:WP:AIV
1149:Mortee
1117:Mortee
1023:Mortee
995:WP:FUR
952:Mortee
933:Hello
805:Mortee
794:WP:TPO
668:Mortee
610:Mortee
555:Mortee
532:Mortee
517:Mortee
431:Mortee
381:Mortee
305:Mortee
177:Mortee
132:Mortee
1279:admin
739:Iflaq
2074:talk
2029:talk
1981:The
1941:talk
1921:talk
1900:talk
1892:here
1860:, a
1816:talk
1788:talk
1767:talk
1743:talk
1726:talk
1711:talk
1696:talk
1676:talk
1661:talk
1641:talk
1622:talk
1607:talk
1583:talk
1569:talk
1554:talk
1529:talk
1504:talk
1490:talk
1466:talk
1442:talk
1419:talk
1329:talk
1312:talk
1297:talk
1287:here
1283:here
1264:talk
1249:talk
1231:talk
1210:talk
1174:talk
1154:talk
1137:talk
1122:talk
1065:talk
1051:talk
1028:talk
1003:talk
957:talk
924:talk
905:talk
810:talk
772:talk
722:~~~~
673:talk
650:talk
629:talk
615:talk
594:talk
580:for
560:talk
540:talk
522:talk
511:here
488:talk
474:talk
451:talk
436:talk
415:talk
407:here
386:talk
358:talk
310:talk
280:talk
239:talk
182:talk
157:talk
137:talk
116:talk
81:Hey
46:2018
1880:).
1776:Hi
1538:Hi
1518:Hi.
1352:On
1273:Hi
1074:Hi
997:.
833:On
781:Hi
603:Hi
505:to
497:Hi
424:Hi
166:Hi
125:Hi
104:.
98:not
74:or
2117:.
2076:)
2068:--
2031:)
2020:}}
2016:{{
1993:,
1902:)
1769:)
1728:)
1713:)
1678:)
1643:)
1624:)
1616:K
1585:)
1571:)
1531:)
1506:)
1444:)
1421:)
1413:—
1408:.
1394:,
1356:,
1314:)
1266:)
1251:)
1176:)
1139:)
1108:}}
1102:{{
1098:}}
1092:{{
1067:)
1053:)
1005:)
926:)
907:)
895:.
881:,
837:,
774:)
763:}}
757:{{
724:.
698:.
652:)
631:)
596:)
542:)
490:)
476:)
453:)
417:)
360:)
282:)
241:)
221:.
159:)
118:)
110:--
2072:(
2027:(
1898:(
1853:D
1847:R
1841:B
1765:(
1724:(
1709:(
1674:(
1639:(
1620:(
1597::
1593:@
1581:(
1567:(
1527:(
1502:(
1456::
1452:@
1440:(
1417:(
1398:)
1390:(
1382:?
1310:(
1262:(
1247:(
1172:(
1135:(
1110:.
1063:(
1049:(
1017::
1013:@
1001:(
922:(
903:(
885:)
877:(
869:?
770:(
663::
659:@
648:(
627:(
592:(
538:(
486:(
472:(
449:(
413:(
372::
368:@
356:(
294::
290:@
278:(
237:(
155:(
114:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
