34:
The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving DataExpress, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the
28:
31:
whether the article DataExpress should be in
Knowledge. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.
70:
36:
62:
18:
81:
47:
74:
43:
69:
the article but if you can help us establish notability according to
83:
51:
27:
I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at
24:
Hello, Mmarost, and thanks for contributing to
Knowledge!
73:then the article is far more likely to be kept. -
8:
29:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/DataExpress
61:Hi Mmarost, I've replied to the AfD for
42:Thanks again for your contributions!
7:
14:
65:. My opinion was that we should
1:
52:18:49, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
84:13:53, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
99:
17:Deletion discussion about
71:Knowledge:Notability
90:
79:
98:
97:
93:
92:
91:
89:
88:
87:
75:
59:
22:
12:
11:
5:
96:
94:
58:
55:
21:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
95:
86:
85:
82:
80:
78:
72:
68:
64:
56:
54:
53:
49:
45:
40:
38:
32:
30:
25:
20:
16:
76:
66:
60:
41:
33:
26:
23:
63:DataExpress
19:DataExpress
37:Help Desk
57:Comment
77:Rushyo
67:delete
48:talk
44:SL93
50:)
39:.
46:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.