Knowledge

User talk:Mo0/Archive3

Source đź“ť

108:
other votes - be bold, and close that as a keep. 'Adnan mohammad' was a pretty obvious delete, and the people that did vote agreed. 'TWEN' had two votes to merge and redirect - if nobody else had disagreed, then it should have just been done. Obviously if there's no votes, or a handful of votes that don't agree, then it would need relisting. It's not like anything that gets done on Knowledge cannot be undone, and you seem sensible enough to make decent judgement calls!
815: 985: 374: 852: 107:
Hi Mo0. You're doing a great job, but I wonder if you could try and reduce the number of AfDs that you're reposting, as if this continues, things will get really, really clogged on AfD. For example, you reposted 'Princess Nathalie of Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg', which had 2 keep votes, and no
967:
Dear administrator, I think it would be advisable to permenantly block or to the greatest extent, the IP: 212.248.245.241, for it has caused repeated nuisance that has gone unnoticed, for example, check the article on 'ignorance'. aLBEIT, i concur with your opinion on Attack of the clones, tom
491:
Reading over the talk page just now, I hope you don't mind that I've blocked this IP for a very short time to deal with the high-speed random page blanking. There are only 2400 students at the school anyway; it is highly unlikely anyone but the vandal will notice the blocking in this brief
577:
I can not believe that the world and Knowledge are not large enough to handle this special bit of information: and I question your motivations in deleting the article in the first place and I'd like to know your motivations - or more properly - who put you up to it. Please respond.
225:
Which, I forgot to remind you, is another reason to check what links to a speedy page. If the AfD isn't closed, AfD bot won't report that day as closed when it's time is up, so admins looking to tie up loose ends will have to look at that day's afd. Someone will have to close it
304:
As to #wikipedia-en-vandalism... I know that it's very popular, and the people who frequent it are very close, but for admin advice the regular #wikipedia-en channel is often more reliable. There are almost always people there with more admin edits than you've had hot
217:
Don't worry, Mountain Dew always has that effect on me. Looking at the AfD, experiance shows that the same guys who are making random comments there will re-create the article, and probably drop some abusive comments on talk pages. Probably
1090:
Thanks for your support on my recent request for adminship. It passed at 91/1/0, and I hope I can continue to deserve the community's trust. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you, and if I make a mistake be sure to tell me.
45:. I think he has learned his leason. He says he won't remove the tag anymore. Would you consider unblocking him so he can take part in the vote? I think he also has a request to provide copyright information on some pictures he took. 763:
And it turned up in my daily sweep for afd-tagged articles that aren't listed on afd. I see from its deletion log that you undeleted it; could you please either redelete it, or remove the afd tag and mention your change of heart on
355:
Many thanks for your support on my request for adminiship, I'm sure you'll be glad to know the final result was 92/1/0. I am now an administrator and (as always) if I do anything you have issue with, please talk about it with me.
126:
Hey, no problem. Keeping AfD clog free is one of my personal bugbears, you're not the first admin I've poked with a stick about it :) Just remember anything you do can be undone, so never worry, and you'll be gravy. All the best!
396:. I was flattered by the level of support and the comments, so I'm under real pressure not to disappoint, thus if you have any queries, suggestions or problems with any of my actions as an admin then please leave me a note -- 541:
Fair enough. I just checked the policy out. Yes, it looks like you can only give up to a month for a static IP. I suppose it's fair. People change ISPs and some poor sod might be stuck with it without knowing how to fix it.
573:
granted the AIF at a reciprocal inter-insurance exchange such as California's Farmers Group or the Automobile Club of Southern California, or Texas's USAA, are very arcane. Very little has been written on the subject.
265:. Why did you delete this and re-create it as a redirect? When people say "merge" we have to use some caution about complying with GFDL, and by deleting the redirect source we lose the contribution history. 1047:
and therefore I have been installed as an administrator now, and I'm ready to serve Wikipedians all over the world with my newly acquired mop and bucket. If you have any questions, do not hestitate to
410:
You left your message about 3RR on the wrong user's talk page. I was not the one who left that. Also, someone deleted the vandal entry that I did leave, but did not take any action on it (yet).
507: 454:
text, though, since there was another vandal submission in between. You must have just looked at the page too quickly or something. Anyway, I copied your message to his talk page. --
865:, which was a lot of support that I really appreciate. I'll try to live up to the expectations; and on that note, if there's ever something I do wrong (or don't do right), please 728:
Hi - I just noticed a dangling pointer to this page, and saw that it was deleted yesterday. But the delete discussion summary says "keep". Is the discussion summary wrong? --
301:. A delete and redirect is normally used only where nothing from the deleted page is put into the target page, and if people want that in AfD they need to say so explicitly. 751: 664:
YIKES! Thanks for letting me know about that! I have a tab that automatically puts that template in, so I'll go fix that right away. Thanks for pointing that out! :)
428:
warning, and today vandalized the featured article of the day. Failing to block him/her sends the message that the test4 warning is an empty threat. Not a good idea.--
800:. I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have already started doing the things people wanted me to be able to do. And hopefully nothing else... 1040: 643:. As you may have realized, this will always display the current day, not the day you inserted the text. Subst:tituting those template values would work. 262: 532:
I think you were too kind! It looks to me like the same guy, not a shared IP. You could have blocked him indefinitely and I don't think he could complain.
765: 739: 293:
err, fourth opinion on that one after this. A normal, unqualified "merge" just means a redirect. Where any actual information or prose gets copied we
254:
tagged. A quick look at the history usually makes that pretty obvious. I always check the history before I tag something, so that hadn't happened here.
998: 1079: 229:
Oh, and I'm going to ask another potentially offensive question. Since you didn't know I was the one who tagged it, did you look at the article's
308:
I'm logging off now, but I'll have a look over your other stuff to see if there is anything else that sticks out at me. Keep up the good mopping!
71: 345: 318: 278: 243: 210: 186: 1117:
Hi! Id like to thank you for looking at the Elite_Roleplaying AdF Vote, and upholding my request for the delete. So, once again, thanks! :)
793: 387: 342: 338: 518:
which I added afterwards explaining). It was listed on exactly the same grounds as the others - would it be OK to delete that as well?
250:
More of a gentle pat than a kick, I hope! It has been known to happen that a valid article will be vandalised into a CSD candidate and
894:
Thanks a heap for deleting my page on Everybody Else. Non-notable band? They're currently #17 on myspace music with 34,000 views.
594: 1054: 1001:! It passed with a final count of 98/2/0. If there is anything I can do to help you, please leave me a message on my talk page! 514:- that I left out of the original nomination by accident, but later added (if you read the AfD there's a short paragraph labelled 31:
So you're gonna ban me. Oh no,I'll just die! I've been sent over on a secret mission from Uncyclopedia! FUCK FUCK YOU MOO_ASS!
74:? Nobody has emptied the "recycle bin" for hours, and the garbage is beginning to stink! Thanks in advance, and cheers! -- 135: 116: 930:
Im so sorry about that I deleted it because Let Me is not one of rihannas singles and shouldnt be there im sorry
810: 316: 276: 241: 208: 184: 614:
agreed that his stuff does not belong here! (I've just deleted it again - he'll probably be on to me next!) --
474: 866: 857:
Okay, this is perhaps a bit overdue, but thank-you for your support in my recent RfA! I passed with a final
341:
and was wondering if you might be able to assist me in identifying and weeding out other probable socks.
1030: 590: 450:, who didn't sign his contribution. Despite the lack of signature, it was pretty clear that it wasn't 415: 200:
I'll ask something that I hope won't offend: did you click on what links here before you deleted this?
582: 311: 271: 236: 203: 179: 1118: 1063: 1048: 873: 633: 165: 151: 945:
This IP range has not stopped vandalizing (though your update summary asserted that it has). See
819: 878: 870: 470: 360: 1039:
Hi Mo0/Archive3. On behalf of my right eye, I'd like to thank you for giving me your support on
681: 651: 42: 35: 447: 772: 716: 120: 56: 46: 268:
You sure you don't mind me saying all this, bearing in mind that my RfA was soundly rejected?
814: 586: 543: 533: 1092: 946: 729: 393: 132: 113: 150:
I don't care if there are any issues. Please delete my account and all my contributions.
1058: 950: 477:'s IP address. Thanks for taking the time to do so! I look forward to editing again. - 455: 429: 422: 337:
Thank you for your help with the latest Superfan incarnation. I have recently created
89: 75: 1005: 897: 797: 698: 615: 478: 357: 17: 769: 706: 510:- thanks for sorting out the deletion. However, there was one additional article - 258: 639:
template in the appropriate talk pages when closing AFDs; however you are writing
562: 913: 519: 511: 493: 443: 842:
I'm confused, why is this user ID still there???? 04:32, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
1096: 755: 677: 647: 128: 109: 834: 1121: 1100: 1071: 984: 953: 916: 881: 837: 823: 775: 758: 732: 718: 668: 618: 606:. Truly amazing. How do we drum it into this guy's thick skull that nobody 559:
Mo0: I would be very grateful if you would not delete my articles: e.g.,
546: 536: 522: 496: 481: 458: 432: 400: 362: 320: 280: 245: 212: 188: 168: 154: 139: 96: 82: 59: 49: 1053: 801: 685: 665: 655: 397: 851: 373: 1029: 833:
See the vandalism page for my repsonse as to where to find him/her.
766:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Michael E. Berumen (2nd nomination)
196:
06:53, 6 January 2006 Mo0 deleted "Metal faith" (Patent nonsense)
473:
said that you were the one who removed the indefinite ban on my
298: 414:
I see that it wasn't you, but would you mind taking a look at
164:
I'm not interested in any policy. I want my account deleted.
1088:
With apologies for the impersonal AWB-ness of the message...
850: 372: 508:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Dorchester Town footballers
673:
I figured it was automatically-inserted text. Cheers :)
997:
Hello Mo0/Archive3, and thank you for your support in my
641:
date={{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}
567:
The notion of the Attorney in Fact as it applies to the
896:
The previous unsigned and untitled comment was left by
796:, which much to my surprise passed 102/1/1, earning me 339:
Category:Knowledge:Suspected sockpuppets of Superfan
968:cruise was too pretentious. yours, User: the_idiot 563:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Attorney_in_fact_for_a_URIE
88:Awesome, MoO, and thanks! You rock! ;-) Cheers, -- 438:No, you missed what I was saying. I didn't write 1007: 392:The final outcome was (80/3/0), so I am now an 8: 263:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/The Left End 912:Thanks for your help on the Pro-Test page. 555:Request for Probity when deleting articles 629:Hi Mo0, I notice you have been using the 788:Please accept my embarrassingly belated 103:Reposting AfDs for a 'clearer consensus' 1051:. Once again, thanks for your support. 506:Hi there - I was the guy who nominated 412:Was that you? Was this just a mistake? 7: 222:talk page because I closed the AfD. 70:MoO, could you please take care of 829:Controversial user : all p**fed up 24: 1043:. It ended with a final tally of 178:Want to bet it gets recreated? - 1052: 983: 813: 102: 947:User Talk:Drini#192.168.165.xxx 746:by an overwhelming margin; the 297:to make some tip of the hat to 933:oh ok once again, i apologize 738:Hi Mo0, the conclusion in the 386:Thanks for your support on my 343:Can't sleep, clown will eat me 285:Well, you might want to get a 72:Candidates for speedy deletion 66:Can you do me a favor, please? 1: 1101:02:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 1072:20:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC) 996: 954:21:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 874: 380: 90: 76: 990: 917:18:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 882:05:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 867:spit in my general direction 838:02:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 824:12:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 776:15:19, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 759:11:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 733:00:23, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 719:22:31, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 669:17:03, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 619:11:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC) 547:05:55, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 537:05:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC) 523:11:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 497:07:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 482:07:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 1049:forward them to my talkpage 459:22:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 433:18:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 401:10:41, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 363:09:44, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 346:08:21, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 321:07:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 281:07:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 246:07:22, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 213:07:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 189:07:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 169:23:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 155:14:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 140:18:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 121:12:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 97:05:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 83:05:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 60:03:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 50:03:48, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1138: 1122:00:08, 2 March 2006 (UTC) 418:. He/she has already had 1115: 1108: 1085: 1076: 1027: 1020: 978: 971: 965: 958: 943: 936: 928: 921: 910: 903: 895: 41:Hi; I got an email from 26: 233:before you speedied it? 1037: 855: 570:special trustee powers 487:Blocking 192.195.225.6 377: 1035: 999:request for adminship 854: 528:Anon you just blocked 388:request for adminship 376: 257:While I'm nagging... 750:was from an earlier 742:was most definately 705:I got it fixed =) — 625:Closing AFDs as Keep 604:Who put you up to it 27:Oh no, I'm scared!! 1038: 856: 724:Michael E. Berumen 378: 1095:is always open. ( 1089: 1018: 1017: 1014: 688: 658: 599: 585:comment added by 446:or 3RR. That was 333:Superfan tracking 138: 119: 1129: 1125: 1114: 1107: 1087: 1084: 1075: 1068: 1061: 1056: 1033: 1026: 1019: 1011: 1003: 1002: 994: 987: 980: 979: 977: 970: 964: 957: 942: 935: 927: 920: 909: 901: 876: 817: 805: 752:October 2005 AfD 740:January 2006 AfD 713: 710: 690: 680: 660: 650: 638: 632: 598: 579: 427: 421: 416:User:64.107.53.2 382: 314: 274: 239: 206: 182: 131: 112: 94: 80: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1113: 1083: 1074: 1064: 1059: 1031: 1025: 1010: 976: 963: 961:212.248.245.241 941: 926: 908: 892: 884: 848: 831: 826: 812: 803: 798:minor notoriety 792:for supporting 786: 726: 711: 708: 703: 701:notice just now 674: 644: 636: 630: 627: 608:put us up to it 580: 557: 530: 504: 489: 467: 425: 419: 408: 403: 370: 353: 335: 312: 272: 237: 204: 180: 176: 162: 148: 105: 68: 39: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1135: 1133: 1119:TheOneCalledA1 1112: 1109: 1105: 1082: 1077: 1028: 1024: 1021: 1016: 1015: 1008: 995: 988: 975: 972: 962: 959: 940: 939:192.87.165.xxx 937: 925: 922: 907: 904: 891: 890:Everybody Else 888: 886: 849: 847: 844: 830: 827: 809: 787: 785: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 725: 722: 702: 695: 694: 693: 692: 691: 626: 623: 622: 621: 556: 553: 551: 529: 526: 503: 500: 488: 485: 466: 463: 462: 461: 407: 404: 384: 371: 369: 366: 352: 349: 334: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 309: 306: 302: 269: 266: 255: 234: 227: 223: 201: 198: 175: 172: 161: 158: 147: 144: 143: 142: 104: 101: 100: 99: 67: 64: 63: 62: 38: 33: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1134: 1124: 1123: 1120: 1110: 1106: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1081: 1078: 1073: 1070: 1069: 1067: 1062: 1055: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1041:my recent RfA 1034: 1022: 1013: 1012: 1000: 993: 989: 986: 982: 981: 973: 969: 960: 956: 955: 952: 948: 938: 934: 931: 923: 919: 918: 915: 905: 902: 899: 898:User:Dthx1138 889: 887: 883: 880: 877: 872: 868: 864: 861:consensus of 860: 853: 845: 843: 840: 839: 836: 828: 825: 822: 821: 816: 811: 807: 799: 795: 791: 783: 777: 774: 771: 767: 762: 761: 760: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 736: 735: 734: 731: 723: 721: 720: 717: 715: 714: 700: 696: 689: 687: 683: 679: 672: 671: 670: 667: 663: 662: 661: 659: 657: 653: 649: 642: 635: 624: 620: 617: 613: 612:independantly 609: 605: 602: 601: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 575: 572: 571: 565: 564: 560: 554: 552: 549: 548: 545: 539: 538: 535: 527: 525: 524: 521: 517: 513: 509: 501: 499: 498: 495: 486: 484: 483: 480: 476: 472: 471:lightdarkness 464: 460: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 436: 435: 434: 431: 424: 417: 413: 405: 402: 399: 395: 394:administrator 391: 389: 383: 375: 367: 365: 364: 361: 359: 350: 348: 347: 344: 340: 332: 322: 319: 317: 315: 310: 307: 303: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 283: 282: 279: 277: 275: 270: 267: 264: 260: 256: 253: 249: 248: 247: 244: 242: 240: 235: 232: 228: 224: 221: 216: 215: 214: 211: 209: 207: 202: 199: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 187: 185: 183: 173: 171: 170: 167: 159: 157: 156: 153: 145: 141: 137: 134: 130: 125: 124: 123: 122: 118: 115: 111: 98: 95: 93: 87: 86: 85: 84: 81: 79: 73: 65: 61: 58: 54: 53: 52: 51: 48: 44: 37: 34: 32: 19: 18:User talk:Mo0 1116: 1104: 1093:My talk page 1086: 1065: 1057: 1044: 1006: 991: 966: 944: 932: 929: 911: 893: 885: 869:. Cheers! -- 862: 858: 841: 832: 818: 789: 768:? Thanks. — 747: 743: 727: 707: 704: 675: 645: 640: 628: 611: 607: 603: 576: 569: 568: 566: 561: 558: 550: 540: 531: 515: 505: 490: 468: 451: 439: 411: 409: 385: 379: 354: 336: 294: 290: 286: 259:The Left End 251: 230: 219: 195: 177: 163: 149: 106: 91: 77: 69: 57:Tom Harrison 47:Tom Harrison 40: 30: 974:RFA Thanks! 879:ruvianLlama 846:RfA Thanks! 587:Zorro redux 581:—Preceding 544:James James 534:James James 512:Andy Harris 492:interval.-- 444:Emo (music) 226:eventually. 174:Metal faith 1036:Thank you! 1032:Thank you! 992:Thank you! 859:vote count 784:AfD Thanks 730:Alvestrand 682:2006-01-19 652:2006-01-19 634:oldafdfull 516:Additional 475:university 469:My friend 406:Wrong user 43:User:Janos 36:User:Janos 806:you know? 802:Just zis 790:thank you 610:, we all 456:Srleffler 448:User:Kefs 430:Srleffler 381:Pgk's RFA 313:brenneman 273:brenneman 238:brenneman 205:brenneman 181:brenneman 1111:AfD Vote 1060:Soothing 1045:(73/2/2) 1009:xaosflux 906:Pro-test 863:(82/1/0) 697:Re:Your 616:RHaworth 595:contribs 583:unsigned 479:Chardish 440:anything 305:dinners. 166:Kingjeff 160:Deletion 152:Kingjeff 146:Kingjeff 92:Phædriel 78:Phædriel 770:Cryptic 231:history 194:Uh-oh. 55:Thanks 1080:My RfA 1023:My RfA 951:bmills 914:JohnFM 794:my RfA 773:(talk) 744:delete 699:WP:AIV 520:Qwghlm 494:Pharos 465:Thanks 442:about 368:Thanks 351:Thanks 287:second 1097:ESkog 949:. -- 924:Sorry 756:Blorg 754:. -- 684:18:25 678:Quarl 654:10:11 648:Quarl 423:test4 291:third 289:umm, 129:Proto 110:Proto 16:< 835:Arno 820:AfD? 804:Guy, 748:keep 712:KMan 591:talk 299:GFDL 295:have 261:per 252:then 1004:-- 709:The 666:Mo0 502:AfD 398:pgk 358:Alf 1099:) 900:. 637:}} 631:{{ 597:) 593:• 452:my 426:}} 420:{{ 390:. 356:-- 220:my 1066:R 875:e 871:P 808:/ 686:Z 676:— 656:Z 646:— 589:( 136:c 133:t 117:c 114:t

Index

User talk:Mo0
User:Janos
User:Janos
Tom Harrison
03:48, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Tom Harrison
03:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Candidates for speedy deletion
Phædriel
05:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Phædriel
05:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Proto
t
c
12:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Proto
t
c
18:31, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Kingjeff
14:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Kingjeff
23:41, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
brenneman


07:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
brenneman

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑