1207:
the heliocentric versus geocentric universe. The principle of relativity is exceedingly simple and the example given, reciprocity, is sufficient for its explanation. The Sun appears to cross the sky daily from East to West, but by the principle of relativity it is the Earth that revolves upon its own axis from West to East. 4) The âunsuccessful attemptâ is a clear reference to the
Michelson-Morley experiment. 5) âfirst order for small quantitiesâ. This is a somewhat dubious statement, for if the quantities are large the implicit suggestion is that the principle of relativity does not apply exactly. âGirl meets Boyâ but âBoy does not meet Girlâ (or Boy meets Girl at some other epoch) which is absurd. That Einstein was unable to state the principle of relativity mathematically and used an example instead is a clear indication that the principle of relativity is an axiom and cannot be challenged. If Girl meets Boy, Boy meets Girl at the same instant in time. 6) Note that the word âinertialâ does not appear here and neither did Einstein intend that it should. If he had, he would not have been able to state: âThence we conclude that a balance-clock at the equator must go more slowly, by a very small amount, than a precisely similar clock situated at one of the poles under otherwise identical conditions.â Those that include the word âinertialâ are vandalizing Einsteinâs theory in favour of one of their own. 7) There is no evidence to support Einsteinâs second postulate, for it is akin to claiming a straight rod will bend when immersed in water, we can see it does. Of course what really happens is light is refracted. The same is true for light from stellar sources. What we see is a distortion, not reality, when light from a moving source is passed by light from the same source emitted earlier.
1195:âIt is known that Maxwell's electrodynamics--as usually understood at the present time--when applied to moving bodies, leads to asymmetries which do not appear to be inherent in the phenomena(1). Take, for example (2), the reciprocal electrodynamic action of a magnet and a conductor. The observable phenomenon here depends only on the relative motion (3) of the conductor and the magnet, whereas the customary view draws a sharp distinction between the two cases in which either the one or the other of these bodies is in motion. For if the magnet is in motion and the conductor at rest, there arises in the neighbourhood of the magnet an electric field with a certain definite energy, producing a current at the places where parts of the conductor are situated. But if the magnet is stationary and the conductor in motion, no electric field arises in the neighbourhood of the magnet. In the conductor, however, we find an electromotive force, to which in itself there is no corresponding energy, but which gives rise--assuming equality of relative motion in the two cases discussed--to electric currents of the same path and intensity as those produced by the electric forces in the former case.
1201:
that, as has already been shown to the first order of small quantities (5), the same laws of electrodynamics and optics will be valid for all frames of reference for which the equations of mechanics hold good. (6) We will raise this conjecture (the purport of which will hereafter be called the âPrinciple of
Relativityâ) to the status of a postulate, and also introduce another postulate, which is only apparently irreconcilable with the former (6), namely, that light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body. (7)â
1073:. He insists that his notion of acceleration, which he improperly calls "proper acceleration" (of course, the standard notion is the only one which deserves this name, since it is the acceleration measured by the observer himself using his accelerometer), is preferable. This incorrect claim also appears to rest upon his confusion either about hyperbolic arc length versus hyperbolic angle or about the relation of Rindler coordinate time to elapsed proper time measured by the Rindler observers. My discussion of these points is in
1272:
1183:
In 1905 Albert
Einstein wrote a paper entitled "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies". Some individuals (including contributors to Knowledge (XXG)) have maliciously and or carelessly misinterpreted this paper, either because they do not understand plain language or they have taken information from
1175:
Whilst I endorse the efforts made by many to present fact in
Knowledge (XXG), the truth remains the the Theory of Relativity is EINSTEIN'S theory, and at no time does he make use of the word "inertial" anywhere in "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies". Thus it appears to be Chris Hillman's and Ed
853:
One author is not all of Islam. Muslims differ -- up to the point of violence -- on many things. Is the author of that book a Sunni? If a Sunni, is he a traditionalist, a modernist, or a Salafi? Or perhaps he's a Shi'a? Or a
Barelvi? What do all the currents of Islamic thought have to say about dua?
431:
a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 33% for major edits and 59% for
1009:
Hi, the old version had text and figures not entirely correct, even seriously misleading. I have completely rewritten this from scratch with completely new figures. This is an important article for pedagogical purposes, and I am pleased that it seems to have come out fairly well. I think it would
124:
Yes, it would be great if you can include that section on point symmetry groups - of course, us specialists should be careful of not including too many gory mathematical details. But I'm sure you can include the maths in a way which will show why it's relevant to the article. Go for it. Feel free to
99:
Many of these have useful variations (cylindrically symmetric versions, various dimensions, various charts) which are worth discussing and which can drastically affect symmetry group. Another interesting point which will take several articles to adequately explain (when I have time) is that various
864:
I believe the author has salafi roots, but I am taking out anything that is too the extremes and only including what is unanimously agreed upon. These are the concepts that sunnis, salafis, hanafis, and people from other madhabs would agree upon. There are some concpets discussed in the book that I
1206:
Analysis: 1) Maxwell's electrodynamics were known to be incorrect in 1905. 2) The subject of the second paragraph is the example âreciprocal electrodynamic action of a magnet and a conductorâ. 3) The term ârelativelyâ was understood long before
Einstein and was essential to the Copernican view of
940:
hi, just noticed that you had (perhaps by accident) added the wrong "controversial" tag to some main articles rather than the talk pages of those articles. the template that you used said that it should only be used on the talk pages of articles. thought you might appreciate the info. keep up the
1200:
Examples (2) of this sort, together with the unsuccessful attempts to discover any motion of the earth relatively to the âlight mediumâ, (4) suggest that the phenomena of electrodynamics as well as of mechanics possess no properties corresponding to the idea of absolute rest. They suggest rather
333:
Great citation! Wow! THANKS! I somehow missed this review by a leading expert (especially since his stuff tends to be right down my line!) and I look forward to studying it. One thing (I am changing project policy page to stress this): when citing arXiv articles, we should always link to the
960:
Hi thanks for your comments on this article! I agree the name should be changed to more accurately reflect the list; it's already been changed and merged (and split) several times already. Politicians and Native
Hawaiians who are notable already have their own lists, for example. Earlier, the
881:
Thanks much for the barnstar. Can you move it to the bottom of my user page? I want to archive my talk pretty soon since I keep getting more angry messages from people upset over some past action of mine, and I'd like to try to move that kinda stuff out of view since I dislike the tone it
342:. I like to read the abstract before downloading, and some will prefer to download postscript rather than pdf (this is in fact much faster and generally more convenient on my system). Other benefits: reader can more conveniently opt to search for other papers by MacCallum, etc. ---
409:? True, it is a stub, but I can't see why it needs either. It states the essential facts about the gauge, which is used for a lot for calculations in cosmology, and it has a reference. I have removed them, but if you reinstate them with a rationale, I'll endeavor fix the problems. â
645:
Well, it was inevitable. If you are not familiar with Tom Van
Flandern's views on "the speed of gravity", whcih he insists on interpreting differently from the Entire Rest of the World, in a way which he is apparently unwilling or incapable of explaining coherently, see
118:
Hi Chris. No, I haven't replaced the other version yet - I think it's better to wait till we have something reasonable (for example, I haven't written enough in some sections, and am still debating whether to include some of the the relativity stuff in the original
107:
Would you like me to try to add a section on the point symmetry group of the
Maxwell equation to your sandbox article? In the short term, some readers might wonder what this is good for. Naturally I could include citations explaining this (for other examples,
773:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
728:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
683:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
558:
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on
Knowledge (XXG) are
283:
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Knowledge (XXG) are
582:
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.
307:
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.
1017:
which unfortunately seems to have bogged down in mutual accusations of incompetence. This is regretable since several interesting points which I made there about the harmonic lattice are important for both Newtonian and relativistic physics.
100:"potential forms" can have different symmetry groups. Also, one should have group analysis of general nonlinear wave equations showing that usual wave equation and friends are distinguished by having a larger than generic symmetry group.
832:
No, don't. MuslimsofUmreka has taken over the Du'a article and used it as the basis of an essay on the "correct" understanding of Du'a, which is unreferenced, original research, and POV. Now he wants everyone to link to "his" article.
153:) someone there is not a fan of gravitational radiation! In any case, that person should not have been using this machine to edit the WP; there are no computer labs or public machines in that building (last I knew, anyway). ---
1214:
it requires to travel from B to A.â which is ridiculous when A is in relative motion with respect to B, yet this assertion is essential to the derivation of the so-called âLorentzâ Transformations which Lorentz do not produce.
103:
Eventually, this should also be tied in with how to determine suitable expressions for energy/momentum of a wave equation directly from the point symmetry group (e.g. in standard wave equation, KdV, Boussinesq).
125:
make any changes to the article you see fit - the article is very much in it's infancy and the new sections I've created are just experimental; they may need to merged, depending on how the article pans out.
1163:
That article lacks objectivity. It has a lot of conspiracy theory shit in it. It's alla bout a campaign by right wing extremists. All of that should be in a separate article. Please take this seriously.
972:, but I'm not sure. If you think it's not a problem, then go for it-- and please clarify the description text at the top of the article to help define "notable", and to help discourage vanity listings.
628:. By the time I remove the stuff with no refs that looks dubious, I'm not left with much. If you could drop over and help, that would be great. Just give me a half an hour to finish the edit I'm doing.
922:, and several others. Could I suggest that you deactivate them (by putting a colon before 'Category' in the link) until such time as the article is in the mainspace rather than the userspace? (As per
1262:
I removed the template from the top of the articles. The new template, after your re-make, should go at the bottom. If you want it on the articles then you should go visit each one and put it on.
818:
to and can you add that stuff that appears to the right of every artcile related to Islam? It usually says, part of a series of Islam in teh box. Its teh green colored box i'm talking about. See
896:
In the second paragraph there is a sentence that is not a sentence. There is no verb, I think. I cannot figure out what this entence is supposed to say or I would fix it. Can you take a look?
1294:
Thanks for the nice note on my talk page. I'm not sure that I'm back. I'm so much happier when I'm on wiki-break. People who hate make me angry and hateful and I don't like that feeling.
865:
am excluding because they seem to be extreme. These concepts include what the author feels to be bid'ah such as congregational du'as and wiping the face after du'a and many other topics.
73:
Suggestion: when I have time, I'd like to create a buncha articles on symmetry groups of PDEs, beginning with point symmetry groups of the usual equations of mathematical physics:
435:
This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the
964:
I'd like your advice though-- lists like this are really prone to vanity listings, which I've recently been trying to weed out, and am worried that changing the name to
777:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
732:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
687:, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
246:
Hey, I'm sorry I edited while the in-use tag was placed; as you've probably guessed my browser had loaded a copy of the page just before the inuse tag was placed.
53:
1127:
The Muhammad (PBUH) article is not unprotected. You have made few changes in the past. Hence I thought that you might want to look and the new changes made. ---
1117:
I appreciate your change in the Muhammd (PBUH) article. I do not know your religion but your change was indeed made from a neutral point of view. Thank you. ---
436:
359:
1043:) contradicts the mainstream viewpoint, as expressed in the current version of the article (which I completely rewrote with completely new figures), in the
1228:
604:
189:
12:56, 8 January 2006 (UTC) no not better as I think that there was a time in which it was not it's capital but it has always wanted it to be and it is --
926:, "If you copy an article to your user namespace (for example, as a temporary draft or in response to an edit war) you should decategorize it".) Cheers,
1060:
confusing Rindler coordinate time with elapsed proper time since the t = 0 in the Rindler chart, as measured by the Rindler observers themselves.
843:
Zora, if you actually look at the bottom, you will see that it is referenced and cited, and the artcile is talking about what du'a is in Islam.
1176:
Schaefer's Relativity with such as yourself endorsing their personal points of view, handing out gold stars like a first grade schoolteacher.
1244:
1095:...you'll see that Netscott doesn't mind me editing that bit. "They question the circumstances of some of his marriages...and his marriage to
800:
1141:
1074:
170:
what do you mean has declared it as it's capatial it all ways has intended on it being that way. Please change it to something else --
954:
789:
744:
699:
572:
297:
665:
for my brief explanation of why the edits from the Kirkland, WA anon are characteristic of pro Van Flandern. Email follows. ---
1222:
318:
362:. The initial comments were pretty appalling, although a few changed their vote after I asked them to take a second look. ---
1028:
1014:
1240:
784:
739:
694:
145:
This seems to be a machine in Rhodes Hall, the administrative building at my Alma Mater, Cornell University (host of the
915:
388:
990:
919:
1218:
1049:"The following diagram shows successive positions of the rod in x-t coordinates of the launchsite or "lab" frame"
755:
710:
900:
621:
Sure, merge them. I'd guess that they are just forms of the same word or root. Thanks for persevering on this.
539:. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The
536:
529:
264:. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The
391:. Unless some new disaster intervenens, I'd really like to run wild in the next month creating new articles.---
680:
770:
725:
214:
1309:
Thanks for your comments regarding {{catdiffuse}}. If you're looking to do some cleanup, I also have the
945:
552:
277:
261:
662:
70:
Hi, I am still behind the ball re your sandbox--- I take it you haven't replaced the other version yet?
1069:
as the covariant derivative of the unit tangent vector to a timelike curve, i.e. he doesn't understand
866:
844:
823:
540:
515:
494:
265:
139:
35:
1032:
1003:
911:
314:
39:
1276:
1128:
1118:
228:
200:
181:
1165:
1044:
1066:
875:
1047:, and elsewhere. In the diagram which he drew (look for the diagram just below his sentence
424:
639:
597:
482:
129:
112:
17:
1310:
1236:
1184:
a second source, or they are prejudiced bigots or wish to promote themselves as theorists.
1099:, whose young age (said to be 9 or 10) at the time their marriage was consummated has been
774:
729:
684:
1314:
914:
contains several pages that still have the categories activated, so they're showing up in
897:
511:
490:
406:
57:
923:
432:
minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)
650:
1155:
976:
796:
751:
706:
486:
428:
427:, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use
309:
1263:
1104:
994:
927:
564:
466:
460:
449:
289:
273:
225:
220:
197:
192:
178:
173:
1248:
1082:
1019:
883:
666:
608:
584:
560:
440:
410:
392:
373:
363:
343:
285:
154:
109:
869:
847:
826:
544:
269:
34:
Did you try? I just got home & did not see anything from Knowledge (XXG). --
1317:
1298:
1281:
1271:
1251:
1158:
1131:
1121:
1107:
1085:
1022:
997:
979:
948:
930:
886:
858:
837:
804:
759:
714:
669:
632:
611:
591:
521:
500:
469:
443:
413:
395:
376:
366:
346:
323:
250:
247:
236:
208:
157:
132:
126:
60:
42:
507:
352:
1295:
855:
834:
629:
548:
164:
1210:
Einsteinâs third âpostulateâ is âwe establish by definition that the ``time
1150:
I am afraid (I am an exile from the spanish Knowledge (XXG)) that a lot of
655:
568:
475:
335:
293:
993:. If you have any suggestions, please let us know. Thank you very much.
387:
In other news, we should probably start talking again about formalizing
625:
372:
Never mind, I think this has been sorted to my grumpy satisfaction. ---
1040:
339:
1081:
BTW, I just replied to your comment in my own talk page. Cheers!---
1100:
1096:
819:
456:
146:
780:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
735:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
690:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
815:
95:
Euler's incompressible hydrodynamics equations, Navier-Stokes.
405:
Hi, can you tell me why you added expert and cleanup tags to
89:
vibrations of beams (Euler's beam equation) and membranes),
1212:
required by light to travel from A to B equals the ``time
1057:
confusing hyperbolic arc length with hyperbolic angle, or
80:
wave equation, Klein-Gordon equation, telegraph equation,
1035:(before registering, he posted in this talk page as the
86:
KdV, sine-Gordon, Boussinesq nd other soliton equations,
231:
203:
184:
1243:. In future please sign your talk page comments; see
961:
generic "list of people from Hawaii" had been merged.
675:
Image copyright problem with Image:Kaababigcircle.jpg
1154:
is on the way for that article. Please be watchful.
765:
Image copyright problem with Image:Kaabacleaning.jpg
510:, so I've left a request for enlightenment there. --
338:
rather than forcing the poor reader to download the
720:Image copyright problem with Image:Kaabacircle.jpg
485:, so there's no need for the less accurate parent
1075:Talk:Bell's spaceship paradox#Rod Ball's mistake?
256:Image copyright problem with Image:Warp drive.jpg
360:Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/Hyperspace
1179:This, though, is but the tip of the iceberg.
799:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
754:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
709:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
603:Hi, M, you might be interested/dismayed by my
1313:project going: that may give you some ideas.
1010:be suitable as a model article for WP GTR.
891:
543:is very careful about the images included in
268:is very careful about the images included in
52:I thought you might be interested in joining
8:
1051:in the first section), he is clearly either
968:might encourage more vanity listings than
575:and place it on the image page like this:
300:and place it on the image page like this:
1245:Knowledge (XXG):Tips/How to sign comments
801:Knowledge (XXG):Image legality questions
656:Steve Carlip and myself arguing with TVF
892:Maxwell's equations in curved spacetime
607:over in WikiProject Pseudoscience. ---
66:Point Symmetries of Maxwell's Equations
77:Laplace, Helmholtz, Poisson equations,
7:
1027:I could use some help today over at
790:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
745:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
700:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
573:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
298:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
1142:11 March 2004 Madrid train bombings
1065:He also doesn't seem to understand
571:. Find the appropriate template in
296:. Find the appropriate template in
1037:St. Mungo Housing Association anon
506:I couldn't see any explanation at
24:
991:peer review for the Islam article
955:List of famous people from Hawaii
463:. Thankyou for your cooperation.
1270:
910:Hi! I noticed that your sandbox
785:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
740:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
695:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
795:This is an automated notice by
750:This is an automated notice by
705:This is an automated notice by
822:to see what I a mrefering to.
439:. Thank you, and happy edits,
1:
1029:Talk:Bell's spaceship paradox
1015:Talk:Bell's spaceship paradox
528:Image copyright problem with
470:16:46, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
444:08:30, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
414:15:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
158:16:45, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
133:09:55, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
113:23:50, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
1235:Hexenmeister, please review
916:Category:Theoretical physics
638:Van Flandern POV-pushing at
396:08:57, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
377:08:57, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
367:23:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
358:I could use some support at
347:20:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
324:00:41, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
251:14:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
61:05:04, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
43:22:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
920:Category:Special relativity
537:Image:Covercropscarroll.jpg
530:Image:Covercropscarroll.jpg
237:13:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
209:12:58, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
1333:
1318:23:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
1187:Firstly, the postulates:
1091:If you read my talkpage...
980:20:03, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
949:12:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
931:21:07, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
870:01:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
859:22:52, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
848:22:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
838:22:34, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
827:19:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
805:09:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
760:08:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
715:13:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
670:21:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
633:08:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
612:18:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
481:The article is already in
1299:23:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
1282:17:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1252:02:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
1159:12:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
1132:20:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
1013:There is a discussion in
906:Categories in the sandbox
901:15:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
887:19:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
756:User talk:Carnildo/images
711:User talk:Carnildo/images
592:12:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
522:10:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
501:17:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
65:
1305:Thanks for your comments
1122:19:52, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
1108:19:35, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
1103:." just sounds awkward.
1086:19:22, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
681:Image:Kaababigcircle.jpg
419:Request for edit summary
1023:04:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
998:01:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
771:Image:Kaabacleaning.jpg
551:(see Knowledge (XXG)'s
276:(see Knowledge (XXG)'s
215:Talk:Jerusalem/capital
1219:Der alte Hexenmeister
1147:Thank you, MathPhys.
769:Thanks for uploading
726:Image:Kaabacircle.jpg
724:Thanks for uploading
679:Thanks for uploading
535:Thanks for uploading
455:Please do not remove
260:Thanks for uploading
624:P.S. I'm working on
541:Wikimedia Foundation
266:Wikimedia Foundation
262:Image:Warp drive.jpg
1241:behavioral policies
1004:Rindler coordinates
941:good editing work!
936:"controversial" tag
912:User:Mpatel/sandbox
459:category link from
989:I am requesting a
617:Ziarah and ziyarat
108:unfortunately).---
1190:Einstein wrote:
1067:four-acceleration
985:Islam Peer Review
876:User talk:Hillman
322:
1324:
1279:
1274:
1268:
640:Speed of gravity
598:Digital Universe
589:
578:
577:{{TemplateName}}
553:Copyright policy
518:
497:
483:Category:Muslims
329:MacCallum review
312:
303:
302:{{TemplateName}}
278:Copyright policy
242:Classical fields
235:
223:
207:
195:
188:
176:
151:speed of thought
54:The Muslim Guild
48:The Muslim Guild
18:User talk:Mpatel
1332:
1331:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1307:
1289:
1277:
1264:
1260:
1180:
1173:
1145:
1115:
1093:
1045:sci.physics FAQ
1007:
987:
958:
938:
908:
894:
879:
867:MuslimsofUmreka
845:MuslimsofUmreka
824:MuslimsofUmreka
812:
809:
767:
722:
677:
643:
619:
601:
585:
576:
545:Knowledge (XXG)
533:
516:
495:
479:
453:
421:
407:Newtonian gauge
403:
401:Newtonian gauge
389:WikiProject GTR
385:
356:
331:
301:
270:Knowledge (XXG)
258:
244:
221:
218:
213:have a look at
193:
190:
174:
171:
168:
149:). Evidently (
143:
68:
50:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1330:
1328:
1306:
1303:
1288:
1285:
1259:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1204:
1203:
1197:
1182:
1178:
1172:
1169:
1144:
1139:
1137:
1135:
1134:
1114:
1111:
1092:
1089:
1079:
1078:
1071:path curvature
1063:
1062:
1061:
1058:
1006:
1001:
986:
983:
957:
952:
946:128.12.119.157
937:
934:
907:
904:
893:
890:
878:
873:
862:
861:
841:
840:
811:
808:
793:
792:
787:
766:
763:
748:
747:
742:
721:
718:
703:
702:
697:
676:
673:
659:
658:
653:
642:
636:
618:
615:
600:
595:
532:
526:
525:
524:
487:Category:Islam
478:
473:
452:
447:
429:edit summaries
420:
417:
402:
399:
384:
383:Formal project
381:
380:
379:
355:
350:
330:
327:
257:
254:
243:
240:
167:
161:
142:
140:128.253.28.118
137:
136:
135:
121:
120:
97:
96:
93:
90:
87:
84:
83:heat equation,
81:
78:
67:
64:
49:
46:
28:
27:e-mail (again)
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1329:
1320:
1319:
1316:
1312:
1304:
1302:
1300:
1297:
1292:
1286:
1284:
1283:
1280:
1273:
1269:
1267:
1257:
1253:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1230:
1227:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1208:
1202:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1177:
1170:
1168:
1167:
1161:
1160:
1157:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1133:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1120:
1112:
1110:
1109:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1090:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1059:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1033:User:Rod Ball
1030:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1016:
1011:
1005:
1002:
1000:
999:
996:
992:
984:
982:
981:
978:
973:
971:
967:
962:
956:
953:
951:
950:
947:
942:
935:
933:
932:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
905:
903:
902:
899:
889:
888:
885:
877:
874:
872:
871:
868:
860:
857:
852:
851:
850:
849:
846:
839:
836:
831:
830:
829:
828:
825:
821:
817:
807:
806:
802:
798:
791:
788:
786:
783:
782:
781:
778:
776:
775:copyright tag
772:
764:
762:
761:
757:
753:
746:
743:
741:
738:
737:
736:
733:
731:
730:copyright tag
727:
719:
717:
716:
712:
708:
701:
698:
696:
693:
692:
691:
688:
686:
685:copyright tag
682:
674:
672:
671:
668:
664:
657:
654:
652:
649:
648:
647:
641:
637:
635:
634:
631:
627:
622:
616:
614:
613:
610:
606:
599:
596:
594:
593:
590:
588:
580:
574:
570:
566:
565:public domain
562:
556:
554:
550:
549:copyright law
546:
542:
538:
531:
527:
523:
519:
513:
509:
505:
504:
503:
502:
498:
492:
488:
484:
477:
474:
472:
471:
468:
464:
462:
461:Dawoodi Bohra
458:
451:
450:Dawoodi Bohra
448:
446:
445:
442:
438:
437:feedback page
433:
430:
426:
418:
416:
415:
412:
408:
400:
398:
397:
394:
390:
382:
378:
375:
371:
370:
369:
368:
365:
361:
354:
351:
349:
348:
345:
341:
337:
336:abstract page
328:
326:
325:
320:
316:
311:
305:
299:
295:
291:
290:public domain
287:
281:
279:
275:
274:copyright law
271:
267:
263:
255:
253:
252:
249:
241:
239:
238:
234:
233:
230:
227:
224:
216:
211:
210:
206:
205:
202:
199:
196:
187:
186:
183:
180:
177:
166:
162:
160:
159:
156:
152:
148:
141:
138:
134:
131:
128:
123:
122:
117:
116:
115:
114:
111:
105:
101:
94:
91:
88:
85:
82:
79:
76:
75:
74:
71:
63:
62:
59:
55:
47:
45:
44:
41:
37:
32:
26:
19:
1308:
1293:
1290:
1265:
1261:
1225:
1217:
1211:
1209:
1205:
1199:
1194:
1189:
1186:
1181:
1174:
1162:
1151:
1149:
1146:
1136:
1116:
1094:
1080:
1070:
1048:
1036:
1026:
1012:
1008:
988:
974:
969:
965:
963:
959:
943:
939:
909:
895:
880:
863:
842:
814:Can you add
813:
794:
779:
768:
749:
734:
723:
704:
689:
678:
660:
651:this summary
644:
623:
620:
602:
586:
581:
561:open content
557:
534:
480:
465:
454:
434:
422:
404:
386:
357:
332:
306:
286:open content
282:
259:
245:
219:
212:
191:
172:
169:
150:
144:
106:
102:
98:
72:
69:
51:
33:
30:
547:because of
423:Hi. I am a
272:because of
1315:Cwolfsheep
1291:Dear MP,
1239:and other
975:Thanks!!!
898:Complexica
517:ÎΔλ ÎÏηÏηÏ
512:Mel Etitis
508:Talk:Islam
496:ÎΔλ ÎÏηÏηÏ
491:Mel Etitis
353:Hyperspace
58:JuanMuslim
1171:Prejudice
1156:Randroide
1113:Thank you
977:Santaduck
797:OrphanBot
752:OrphanBot
707:OrphanBot
310:Admrbâltz
165:Jerusalem
119:article).
31:Mpatel -
1229:contribs
1152:blanking
1105:BhaiSaab
1031:, where
995:BhaiSaab
944:cheers,
928:Ziggurat
882:sets.---
661:Now see
569:fair use
476:Abu Bakr
467:Siddiqui
340:pdf file
294:fair use
92:Maxwell,
1101:debated
966:notable
626:Khanqah
441:Mathbot
226:dam1213
198:dam1213
179:dam1213
1311:WP:INT
1266:Cuñado
1258:sahaba
1237:WP:NPA
1129:Faisal
1119:Faisal
1041:London
970:famous
567:, and
292:, and
163:about
130:(talk)
1287:Hullo
1247:. ---
1097:Aisha
1039:from
924:WP:CG
820:Islam
605:alarm
587:Shyam
457:Islam
248:Masud
147:arXiv
16:<
1296:Zora
1278:Talk
1223:talk
1166:Dmar
856:Zora
835:Zora
810:Du'a
663:this
630:Zora
489:. --
411:Joke
229:Talk
201:Talk
182:Talk
40:Talk
1018:---
816:dua
555:).
425:bot
280:).
56:.--
36:EMS
1301:.
1275:-
1249:CH
1231:)
1083:CH
1020:CH
918:,
884:CH
803:.
758:.
713:.
667:CH
609:CH
579:.
563:,
520:)
499:)
393:CH
374:CH
364:CH
344:CH
317:|
304:.
288:,
217:--
155:CH
127:MP
110:CH
38:|
1226:·
1221:(
1077:.
514:(
493:(
321:)
319:C
315:T
313:(
232:+
222:A
204:+
194:A
185:+
175:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.