544:. Do you see the section with two paragraphs under "Other Achievements"? The first and longest section of the article body—under the section header "VWO"—was the entire content of the first paragraph from this site (with no changes), starting with the words "VWO (formerly known as..." and ending with "...for their audiences." The lead also contained direct copying from there, such as the sentence "an A/B testing and conversion optimization platform,..." Most of the first long sentence of the next section (made up of two sentences total), that was under a section header "Pushcrew", is lifted from the second paragraph of the site, with some very minor changes (i.e., very closely paraphrased) so that it would not match if you used the find function with the whole sentence copied. Best regards--
832:
faith editor who does make a lot of needed contributions to
Knowledge, as can be seen on his user page. He's basically the only editor we have expanding coverage of South Asian bishops, and he's done a good job learning from previous mistakes in this area.All that to say, when an editor has been around for a while and is clearly here to contribute content, it's often better to assume it was an accident when they blank a page and revert it and leave a message on their talk page asking if they want it deleted rather than tagging it for G7. If you have any other questions about NPP, my talk page is always open. Happy editing :)
408:
881:
458:, I saw the g12 nomination, and determined it was indeed a blatant copyright violation, as tagged. You had removed that tag stating opaquely "Not eligible for db-copyvio", leaving the db-corp in place. Can you advise what made you think this was not G12 eligible? Copyright violations are much more serious than promotion, and should not be removed lightly. Best regards--
215:, but i think this is not correct. I used the links as references, and although inline references would also be preferred by myself, with information used throughout the article it should be ok to add the references without inline links. The way you did it, it seems that the article uses no references at all.
736:, and their other articles were promos for two people who ran it: the original draft that I speedied was basically promo linked to their promo pages. It's also apparently not eligible for db-a10: the new article is about a place that closed in 2009; the older article is about a place that closed in 1980.
487:
Ah, those tools are useful for gross work—finding the low hanging fruit—but must always be checked by a human and their negative results are often incorrect. They fail to find non-renderable text, anything in a PDF, anything hidden in drop down or other lead off from the main page (which often don't
831:
Hi Mr. MacTidy. I'm Tony. I do a lot of work with new pages on
Knowledge. Jeromeenriquez sometimes comes to me with questions about articles because we share interests in South Asia and Christian clerics. Something I did want to point out is that despite his long talk page Jeromeenriquez is a good
539:
Hmm. Maybe you somehow were redirected and did not arrive at the site it was flagged as a copyvio of? (Occasionally, I've been seemingly shunted off by some IP geolocate detection mechanism, to a different URL). I'm wondering because it was quite blatant and mostly word-for-word rather than close
684:
Yes I have, and it's natural that you should ask, because my earliest edits from this account are pretty obvious that way. I've had several accounts. It's complicated. :-) But though you're not asking about sockpuppetry, I'll volunteer for other editors reading this that I've never made a single
854:
Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm - we certainly need all the help we can get. However, as we cannot take into account claimed experienced from previous accounts or your IP edits, and as the bulk of your talk page contains issues regarding your patrolling, I'm asking you to
662:
You clearly have a very good grasp of how
Knowledge works. Have you previously edited before creating this account? I ask purely out of interest, and of course it's entirely up to you whether you wish to answer or not. (And to avoid any misunderstanding, this is not a veiled accusation of
893:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
816:
for
Deletion? This article was redirected by someone, which is because they are just trying to clear the backlog and are not bothered about reading the content. I had to revert that redirect to save the article. And its not blank. Go through the article and remove the tag for deletion.
623:, and tagged the remaining redirect for deletion. Some time later, before it could be deleted, another editor came along and began filling the redirect with content, making it into an article. The problem is that the page creator now appears to be me, when it fact it was started by
627:. So I've asked an administrator to merge the page history of the Draft article into the new article, which will then correctly show User:Lo209 as the article's creator. Please let me know if you have any more questions on this, or if I'm not being clear. Thanks,
136:
I see that, but at least one was a copyedit, and that breaks the threshold for G5 deletion IMO. I don't think this article would survive a deletion discussion, but I don't read the language that the "references" are written in, and sometimes I'm surprised.
189:
My opinion, as I said, is that a copyedit exceeds the "uncontroversial" threshold of CSD. Yes, the edit was fairly minor, but I'm not 100% sure that every person who might review that edit would fully agree. I don't object to the deletion, for the record.
685:
sockpuppet edit in hundreds of thousands of edits made. I've kicked off and added to a metric fucktonne of SPIs myself, in fact. But I'm surprised to learn that you edit under a pseudonym: is that a reference to the behaviourist?
558:
No idea what went wrong there! But don't worry about me not taking copyvio seriously - if you check my edit history and CSD log there's a ton of G12 in there, and I revdel when necessary too. I don't drink or do drugs, either. :-)
156:
The article has now been deleted for other reasons, but for what it's worth, I agree with you, Mr. MacTidy. Speedy deletion criterion G5 applies if there are "no substantial edits by others" and I don't begin to understand how
492:. Those are just the ones I understand. Sometimes I can be staring right at the copyvio, word-for-word copying, and cannot figure out why the tool can't "understand" the text is exactly the same. I wrote the section at
587:
Hello, my classmates and I have just uploaded the
Folliculostellate cell article as part of our course and we do not understand what the edits you have done are. Could you explain what you have done and help us out?
855:
restrict your patrolling to simple maintenance tags and to refrain from tagging for any of the forms of deletion until your account has at least reached qualification standards to obtain access to the
642:
Hello Mr. MacTidy. Thank you so much. We were not aware that that was what happened as it was our first time making a wikipedia page. Thank you for asking the administrator to merge the two histories. Thanks again
921:
905:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
434:
Thank you! Well done on the excellent first article, and thanks for all the contributions you've already made on motorcycle articles - you seem to know a lot about the subject.
709:. It wasn't appropriate as the venue has closed so can't really be promoted. However, I have added another CSD tag as it is actually a duplicate of an existing article.
300:
My apologies. I mistakenly thought I was on another talkpage. I had just blanked another talk page with the same content by the same author. Thanks for cleaning up.
473:
Hi, I looked at the cited URL, and used
Duplicate Detector and Copyvio Checker to see if I'd missed something, and came up empty handed each time. What did I miss?
663:
sockpuppetry. I edited as an IP editor before creating an account and, unlike some
Knowledge editors, I have no problem with other people who do the same.)
122:, hello. Understood, but please note that the only two subsequent edits were addition of underlinked and uncategorised tags, rather than content edits.
71:
to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
383:
If you mean the
Spanish WP article, then don't worry, that will get fixed automatically. For now, the link still works via the redirect: try it.
315:
Happy to help, and yes it's clear that the editor is here to spam an incoherent political screed - I might well have made the same mistake.
935:
856:
355:
196:
143:
104:
931:
34:, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And
603:
253:
Hello Mr. MacTidy, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
914:
926:
733:
493:
269:
If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at
220:
620:
549:
501:
463:
822:
781:
359:
294:
420:
837:
674:
172:
19:
619:, yes I'm happy to help. The article was originally an empty page for over ten minutes, so I moved it to
902:
216:
407:
755:
714:
591:
545:
512:
497:
459:
51:
unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—
37:
818:
777:
706:
48:
87:
80:
416:
413:
Thank you for your help Mr. MacTidy on article I wrote on quickshifter! I really appreciate it.
889:
864:
833:
670:
648:
599:
254:
247:
184:
168:
68:
455:
898:
813:
809:
796:
773:
737:
686:
628:
560:
526:
496:
and put in a few warnings there about placing too much trust in these tools. Best regards---
474:
435:
384:
370:
334:
316:
305:
231:
123:
913:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
751:
727:
710:
282:
191:
158:
138:
117:
99:
776:, before putting any template on a article please check if it is being worked on or not.
910:
489:
271:
260:
906:
792:
264:
93:
86:
Hello Mr. MacTidy. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
860:
644:
614:
595:
31:
880:
161:
could view the subsequent edits as "substantial". All of them were quite trivial.
55:—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if
541:
521:, I meant I first manually compared the two pages, couldn't see any overlap, and
351:
330:
301:
624:
277:
329:
I'm always happy to be politely corrected when someone notices before I do.
525:
used the tools to see if I'd missed something. So what did I miss? Thanks,
257:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:
90:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:
939:
868:
841:
826:
804:
785:
759:
745:
718:
694:
678:
652:
636:
568:
553:
534:
505:
482:
467:
443:
424:
392:
378:
363:
338:
324:
309:
288:
239:
224:
201:
176:
148:
131:
109:
259:
at least one reliable source covers him, which is sufficient for A7. Try
917:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
750:
Oh, more complex than I realised then. Good spot on the dates, thanks!
275:. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you.
705:
Hi Mr. MacTidy, I removed the spam speedy deletion tag you placed on
920:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
791:
Actually I waited ten minutes for you to add a reference to a
212:
Hello, you moved the references to an external links section
494:
Knowledge:New pages patrol#Copyright violations (WP:COPYVIO)
901:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
213:
488:
have their own URLs) and of course, cannot understand
454:
Hi Mr. MacTidy. When I looked at the page history of
26:
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the
859:user group. Thank you for your comprehension.
795:. I've added one to stop it getting BLP prodded.
517:I didn't make myself clear above. When I wrote
208:Edits on Sai Gon Mechanical Engineering Company
542:This is the site it was marked as a copyvio of
8:
732:. The creator's original account name was
589:
354:Doesn't links to the interwiki article.
7:
890:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
812:, can you explain why you nominated
230:I've moved both references inline.
887:Hello, Mr. MacTidy. Voting in the
874:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
14:
666:The editor who uses the pseudonym
450:Non-transparent removal of db-G12
164:The editor who uses the pseudonym
40:with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
879:
701:Speedy deletion template removed
406:
924:and submit your choices on the
583:Filliculostellate cells editing
869:00:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
842:22:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
827:16:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
805:12:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
786:12:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
760:00:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
746:21:13, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
719:19:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
695:09:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
679:20:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
637:11:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
569:08:52, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
554:22:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
535:05:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
506:22:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
483:20:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
468:20:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
444:16:24, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
425:16:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
415:- Navin Singh (navinsingh133)
393:03:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
379:03:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
364:03:43, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
339:03:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
325:03:15, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
310:03:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
289:07:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
240:11:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
225:11:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
202:13:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
177:11:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
149:13:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
132:13:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
110:13:43, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
1:
903:Knowledge arbitration process
92:Subsequent edits. Please try
940:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
621:Draft:Folliculostellate cell
519:" I looked at the cited URL"
653:17:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
67:. Remember, we can use our
957:
932:MediaWiki message delivery
246:Speedy deletion declined:
79:Speedy deletion declined:
369:Which interwiki article?
347:Please, fix the interwiki
800:
741:
690:
632:
564:
530:
478:
439:
388:
374:
320:
235:
127:
540:paraphrasing. Anyway,
295:Freedom from Starvation
63:, please respond to it
734:User:Projectonegallery
899:Arbitration Committee
399:Some baklava for you!
707:Project one gallery
59:leave a comment on
915:arbitration policy
490:close paraphrasing
38:sign your messages
857:New page Reviewer
668:
607:
594:comment added by
431:
430:
166:
47:I prefer to keep
948:
883:
814:Akhu Chingangbam
731:
664:
658:Earlier editing?
618:
516:
410:
403:
402:
285:
280:
217:Pieceofmetalwork
188:
162:
121:
36:don't forget to
22:to my talk page!
956:
955:
951:
950:
949:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
884:
876:
861:Kudpung กุดผึ้ง
852:
770:
768:Patience Please
725:
703:
660:
612:
585:
546:Fuhghettaboutit
513:Fuhghettaboutit
510:
498:Fuhghettaboutit
460:Fuhghettaboutit
452:
401:
349:
298:
283:
278:
251:
210:
199:
182:
146:
115:
107:
84:
76:
24:
12:
11:
5:
954:
952:
922:the candidates
885:
878:
877:
875:
872:
851:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
819:Jeromeenriquez
807:
778:Jeromeenriquez
769:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
702:
699:
698:
697:
659:
656:
640:
639:
584:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
451:
448:
447:
446:
429:
428:
411:
400:
397:
396:
395:
381:
348:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
297:
292:
272:User:SoWhy/SDA
250:
244:
243:
242:
209:
206:
205:
204:
195:
154:
153:
152:
151:
142:
103:
83:
77:
61:your talk page
16:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
953:
942:
941:
937:
933:
929:
928:
923:
918:
916:
912:
908:
904:
900:
895:
892:
891:
882:
873:
871:
870:
866:
862:
858:
849:
843:
839:
835:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
815:
811:
808:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
789:
788:
787:
783:
779:
775:
767:
761:
757:
753:
749:
748:
747:
743:
739:
735:
729:
723:
722:
721:
720:
716:
712:
708:
700:
696:
692:
688:
683:
682:
681:
680:
676:
672:
667:
657:
655:
654:
650:
646:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
616:
610:
609:
608:
605:
601:
597:
593:
582:
570:
566:
562:
557:
556:
555:
551:
547:
543:
538:
537:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
514:
509:
508:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
486:
485:
484:
480:
476:
472:
471:
470:
469:
465:
461:
457:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
432:
427:
426:
422:
418:
417:Navinsingh133
412:
409:
405:
404:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
380:
376:
372:
368:
367:
366:
365:
361:
357:
356:190.24.53.137
353:
346:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
314:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
296:
293:
291:
290:
287:
286:
281:
274:
273:
268:
266:
262:
256:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
214:
207:
203:
198:
193:
186:
181:
180:
179:
178:
174:
170:
165:
160:
150:
145:
140:
135:
134:
133:
129:
125:
119:
114:
113:
112:
111:
106:
101:
97:
95:
89:
82:
78:
75:
72:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
41:
39:
33:
29:
23:
21:
925:
919:
896:
888:
886:
853:
834:TonyBallioni
771:
704:
671:JamesBWatson
665:
661:
641:
590:— Preceding
586:
522:
518:
453:
414:
350:
299:
276:
270:
258:
252:
211:
185:JamesBWatson
169:JamesBWatson
163:
155:
98:Thank you.
91:
88:Kanha Raawat
85:
81:Kanha Raawat
73:
64:
60:
56:
53:my talk page
52:
44:
43:
35:
27:
25:
17:
927:voting page
810:Mr. MacTidy
797:Mr. MacTidy
774:Mr. MacTidy
738:Mr. MacTidy
687:Mr. MacTidy
629:Mr. MacTidy
561:Mr. MacTidy
527:Mr. MacTidy
475:Mr. MacTidy
436:Mr. MacTidy
385:Mr. MacTidy
371:Mr. MacTidy
317:Mr. MacTidy
232:Mr. MacTidy
124:Mr. MacTidy
74:Thank you!
49:discussions
30:, as a new
911:topic bans
752:Lineslarge
728:Lineslarge
711:Lineslarge
625:User:Lo209
192:Ivanvector
159:Ivanvector
139:Ivanvector
118:Ivanvector
100:Ivanvector
45:Attention:
907:site bans
69:watchlist
604:contribs
592:unsigned
255:MC SKULE
248:MC SKULE
645:Szenios
615:Szenios
596:Szenios
456:Wingify
261:WP:PROD
32:section
20:welcome
18:Hello,
793:WP:BLP
611:Hello
331:Meters
302:Meters
265:WP:AFD
28:bottom
772:Dear
197:Edits
144:Edits
105:Edits
65:there
936:talk
897:The
865:talk
838:talk
823:talk
801:talk
782:talk
756:talk
742:talk
715:talk
691:talk
675:talk
649:talk
633:talk
600:talk
565:talk
550:talk
531:talk
523:then
502:talk
479:talk
464:talk
440:talk
421:talk
389:talk
375:talk
360:talk
352:Here
335:talk
321:talk
306:talk
236:talk
221:talk
173:talk
128:talk
850:NPP
724:Hi
673:" (
284:Why
263:or
171:" (
94:AFD
938:)
930:.
909:,
867:)
840:)
825:)
803:)
784:)
758:)
744:)
717:)
693:)
677:)
651:)
643:--
635:)
606:)
602:•
567:)
552:)
533:)
504:)
481:)
466:)
442:)
423:)
391:)
377:)
362:)
337:)
323:)
308:)
279:So
238:)
223:)
200:)
194:(/
175:)
147:)
141:(/
130:)
108:)
102:(/
934:(
863:(
836:(
821:(
799:(
780:(
754:(
740:(
730::
726:@
713:(
689:(
669:"
647:(
631:(
617::
613:@
598:(
563:(
548:(
529:(
515::
511:@
500:(
477:(
462:(
438:(
419:(
387:(
373:(
358:(
333:(
319:(
304:(
267:.
234:(
219:(
187::
183:@
167:"
126:(
120::
116:@
96:.
57:I
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.