User talk:Ms96 - Knowledge

3311:, taken as personal attacks against others (while I was 100% referring to myself) and played a major role in the subsequent events including the Indefinite block implemented on my account. I surely do understand that these words, regardless of being against me or anyone else or even no one, are absolutely not appropriate for here, or anywhere else. I actually would like to delete them from my talk page asap, but I feel that might be taken as some sort of "hiding" something at this point. I have not pushed for any sort of conspiracy (if there are, anyone is welcome to provide a diff; I actually had 0 edits in that article and never even made any claims about the reality or unreality of that theory) and not used any sort of slurs (except against myself, which I genuinely regret). It is said that I'm not here to build an encyclopedia, but it's exactly the opposite. I have previously proven my good faith in collaborating with others 725:

statement claiming that there was nothing wrong with Iran's numbers, which is outdated and contradicted by more recent WHO statements that claim that actual numbers are likely five times higher. Attempts at updating this, deleting that outdated and incorrect claims, have been sistematically reverted by these users, that have also deleted several lines and links referring to outside sources that estimate a far heavier toll in Iran. Iran claims to have far less cases than Italy, Spain, Germany, France, and the USA, and less deaths than Italy, Spain, and France (soon enough the USA as well), despite the outbreak in Iran starting at the same time as Italy and much earlier than in the other countries, and Iran not implementing a national lockdown unlike them (on the contrary, Iran early on denied the outbreak and held

3707:, including several admins and a multitude of experienced users (my talk page had 300 PageViews, equal to Jimbo_Wales, on July 12!) doesn't mean I should die. Hopefully this is not meant to be a "preventive" action, to put me under the most extreme pressure for my POV so that even after I get through this, with regard to the tiniest odds, I would totally forget about touching the areas others don't like. I do respect consensus, I do understand I should not have used those words against me, and I should not have edited that tendentiously. Thanks. 3111:

played a major role in the subsequent events including the Indefinite block implemented on my account. I surely do understand that these words, regardless of being against me or anyone else or even no one, are absolutely not appropriate for here, or anywhere else. I actually would like to delete them from my talk page asap, but I feel that might be taken as some sort of "hiding" something at this point. Despite not pushing for any sort of conspiracy (if there are, anyone is welcome to provide a diff; I actually had

3572:

had but one answer from the beginning. Do nothing with us! Your doing with us has already played the mischief with us. Do nothing with us! If the apples will not remain on the tree of their own strength, if they are worm-eaten at the core, if they are early ripe and disposed to fall, let them fall! ... And if the negro cannot stand on his own legs, let him fall also. All I ask is, give him a chance to stand on his own legs! Let him alone! ... our interference is doing him positive injury.

100:. There's a new bonus prize of $ 200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! 3657:. The whole ANI section didn't even last for half an hour and I got a super-fast indeff for what? (the worst part is someone, two days after on July 14, saying "User has continued their diatribe on their talk page, might be time to revoke TPA." after a serial of PAs where an admin who thinks I am "try to play Iago as a sympathetic tragic hero" called me "racist" and "paranoid", questioned "my ability to read and write", and asked "what toilet" I pull citations from). 2491:, they're pushing for the organization to be labelled Marxist in Knowledge's voice. They claim to have sources but what they really have is a novel synthesis based on sources identifying various BLM "leaders" as Marxist. Several editors have rejected this but they're still going as of today. I claim to have sources? Maybe because there are many, many sources (If you mean that Amazon Createspace book, I immediately apologized for it; see my comments in item 3626:"? Enough personal attacks, Ian. You are the boldest, rudest, and most shameless admin I have so far come across. Please leave if you want to continue this way; better for everyone. "all your actions are public record here" That's like a heavenly gift; just imagine what you would have accused me of if it wasn't the case. After all, I do agree that I should have shown more respect toward the consensus. I actually admitted to this before being blocked. 2359:"On Reverse racism, Ms96 made a bold edit to the article's lede stating bluntly that reverse racism is a real social phenomenon, rather than the sourced consensus that it's alleged by conservatives as an attack on affirmative action programs, or the zero-sum white supremacist belief that all societal gains by non-whites come at whites' expense, basing their edit solely on the existence of discriminatory policies against whites in Zimbabwe" 875: 759: 111: 30: 827:. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 2118: 3900: 3220: 2211: 46: 1602: 1255: 2152: 2043:. They're not nearly as fussy about verification and factuality as we are, just as long as the political slant is right, and you seem to have that down pat. But don't try for anything creative, it doesn't appear to be your forté. ("A Tribute to My Left Fellas in the Talk Page of the Carcass of a Canceled Rural Psychopath", OMG that is just so, so ... so utterly, incredibly, 1503: 971: 1832:

theory, and your rather bizarre thought patterns, but your efforts to tilt Knowledge away from reality and verifiable facts towards your preferred beliefs are not welcome, and will continue to be countered at every opportunity. We're here because we believe in Knowledge, you're obviously here for other reasons entirely.

3174:

When I called someone a liar, it was because they made statements that were demonstrably false, statements that implied that all editors working on an article were lazily pushing some sort of POV to cover up an atrocity. That user has since admitted that their statements about the article's sourcing

2586:! "A Tribute to My Left Fellas in the Talk Page of the Carcass of a Canceled Retarded Rural Psychopath" whose talk page is here? I though it was mine!!! I want to call myself "a Canceled Retarded Rural Psychopath". I call myself whatever I see fit! "a comment directed at a named user"? You mean Ms96?! 1705:

The warning is a standard template. The wording is boilerplate stuff, lacking full applicability for all recipients. I don't apologize for the wording or endorse all of it. Here's the point, though: the act of putting it on your talk page is a required step of getting you blocked for disruption. It's

3670:

I did not attack anyone (other than me, for which I have previously, even before block, expressed my regret). "directed at a named user, whose name I purposely omitted" in the ANI thread also indicates another "misunderstanding". It was clearly directed at me. I have not attacked anyone. By the way,

1107:

Well, there were actually zero users favoring the removal of the content you deleted. I just want to mention you'd better give up trying to "build everything upon consensus", in general. Worth noting that one of your "content concerns" was, among others, that reverse racism "is pushed by the current

724:

has been hijacked by a group of Iranian users (or multiple alternate accounts of the same user, it is quite possible) attempting to censor the misgivings about Iran's obviously fake numbers on the coronavirus epidemic there. The lead sections, for instance, contains a line referring to a 2 March WHO

570:

Though I hadn't seen my talk page and hence your message before that edit you mentioned, I personally think you were right in blocking me. Anyway, I didn't mean to be rude by any means. Also, sorry for wasting much of your time here. Feel free to ask any questions if any of what I said is not clear.

3782:

I think you're being much too lenient in not objecting to another admin unblocking. The aggressive attitude that Ms96 is projecting here is highly indiciative of the type of editor who will continue in tendentious editing if they're unblocked, with or without a politics topic ban. I do not think

3571:

n regard to the colored people, there is always more that is benevolent, I perceive, than just, manifested towards us. What I ask for the negro is not benevolence, not pity, not sympathy, but simply justice. The American people have always been anxious to know what they shall do with us... . I have

2898:

Also, if a user says something that is obviously false but also demonstrates knowledge that reality is contrary to their statement, what else would you call their statement but lying? That has been repeatedly shown, and your attempts to reinterpret things in that users favor amounts to little more

1156:

The status quo ante is certainly where we are right now, MS96, but I wanted to point out that your insistence on reverting to your own version, rather than my more moderate version that immediately preceded the removal of the new material, suggests an IDONTHEARTHAT attitude that does not contribute

479:

Just go for any random edit by this user to see how harshly he's supporting the Iranian government and eradicating any single negative issue thereof (also the reason and the page that he's blocked in). Those two diffs are examples of his disruptive pattern, simply removing any well-sourced, correct

4020:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. As a note, "see my previous request" does not

3985:

Hi. After a few months of being away from all that heat and giving thoughts to my actions, I am again requesting to be unblocked. I perfectly do understand that I shouldn't have acted that tendentiously and would not engage that furiously in any issue whatsoever. I said everything necessary in the

3843:

Sorry, but I think "I do not think that Ms96's personality is conducive to editing" is the last in a serial of PAs against me by BMK. The extraordinary amount of harassment, hounding, and stalking is also striking. "Non-constructive" would be the most euphemistic description of their attitude with

3442:

describe behaviors considered disruptive no matter how politely the person doing those things imagines they are). Whatever the case there (incompetent accident, accidental POV-pushing, or willful POV-pushing), that event in light of your attempts at Talk:White genocide CT to include material that

3110:

Thank you for your suggestion, your words have always helped me. Yes I do understand that I didn't act in the most appropriate way. I'm especially regretful about the last edits in my talk page before being blocked which were, obviously by mistake, taken as personal attacks against other users and

1831:

Thank you, and thank you for making it abundantly clear that your editing is controlled by your personal political ideology, and not by the relevant Knowledge policies, which is what (the vast majority of) the rest of us follow. You're welcome to the warmth and comfort of your personal conspiracy

3029:

multiple experienced users support the block and so far only you oppose it, it's safe to assume that the reviewing admin see it as justified. Your appeal makes no indication whatsoever that you are really aware that your behavior needs to change, merely customary lipservice to the idea at most.

3433:

instead of one more concern about what sort of POV you want. However, those two ideas aren't mutually exclusive -- someone who agrees with a certain POV (even if they imagine they're being neutral) is going to gravitate towards sources that align with their POV. (This is actually expected to a

1959:? I would appreciate you if there is any possibility that you delete that part of the comment saying "it misrepresents the sources given, synthesizes disparate sources to suggest a conclusion the sources do not state" in the talk page of that article and I'm gone. It's a libel. I didn't do that. 3028:

on the relevant article talk pages. The reviewing admin is only obligated to judge whether CaptainEek was justified in responding to the ANI thread with an indefinite block and (assuming the block is correct) whether your appeal indicates any chance that your behavior will improve. Given that

372:

No I'm not gonna ask for unblock, but I don't understand "where you're getting that they're lying about Farsi being their mother tongue". What I meant was that while his mother tongue is Persian (same as me, what provocation?), he tries to deceive other users by claiming that the content is not

3734:

I'm OK with a topic ban on US politics; Could it be non-indefinite but long? Like 9 months or 1 year or more, unappealable. I'm simply not looking for more drama, which includes asking for the ban to be lifted. I'll be contributing to BLP, books, geography, probably Iran-related issues, among

2969:

a page that's not available on either the Google Books or Amazon preview. Oh, but we can see the table of contents on Google Books and Amazon, and we see that page 368 is the beginning of chapter 18: "Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty/Great Society: The 200-year Plan for Black Americans to Keep

1088:

Please stop telling me to read things I have read many times in the 13 years I've been here. By pointing me to DEMOCRACY, you are merely declaring that you are right. I have looked at your sources and commented. I have expressed my content concerns there, not here. I have expressed my conduct

523:

Well, I can't help that. And yet you continue with "deceive" even after you were aware of the warning. The point is that you went about resolving this content dispute the wrong way. I'm not saying they are without blemish, either, but the whole "vandalism," "lying," "disruption", "deceive,"

3115:

edits in that article and never even made any claims about the reality or unreality of that theory) and not using any sort of slurs (except against myself, which I genuinely regret), I think distancing myself from those topics for some reasonable time is for everybody's benefit, including

2306:"They're one of a seemingly endless string of accounts coming to the page to advocate for including irrelevant demographic statistics to this article on a batshit crazy white supremacist theory that Jews are conspiring with government agents around the world to exterminate the white race" 1684:

Please explain for everyone and for the sake of keeping some record, which of my edits "means that I am repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be". (Note that you should provide more than 1 edits, since "repeatedly" automatically implies a number greater than 1.)

2669:

I was blocked "Given the suggestions of topic bans in multiple areas, the clear POV-pushing and conspiracy nonsense, and their cavalier use of slurs and PA's, I have simply indeffed them for WP:NOTHERE". "topic bans in multiple areas" by SharabSalam and Doug Weller after 1.5 months

1806:

Things won't change as long as the left breeze sweeps through WP. This warfare I am under without crossing a single red line or even approaching it is a clear sign that freedom of non-profit organisations in a Western democracy is a complete hoax (MSpiracy theory). I said it to

1009:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. 3429:. In that topic, that alone should be enough for a block. And while you say that citing the conspiracy theorist work "Don't Believe the Hype" was an accident, even if we take that face value and ignore your activities at Talk:White genocide CT, that episode would just raise 2616:) on a new user with 3 edits, two in an article's talk page and one in 2010 winter olympics opening ceremony. An editor whose talk page didn't even contain a welcome message, but was decorated with two consecutive warning messages in less than 10 minutes. See my reply to Ian: 2353:. No idea how it's interpreted as a legal threat. "Libel" is not a word exclusively used in the legal context. I, by no means, did not intend to make any legal threats and if anyone feels that way they'd better reconsider their definition of both words "legal" and "threat". 241:, this is the attributing. There was no attributing in that admin notification in my talk page. It turned out that the admin who posted that notification is the creator of the template. Attributing is important because all text in English Knowledge is protected by this 173:. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged 2445:. I haven't even made any attempts to add these sources to the article yet. I gathered these after searching for more sources when an editor rightfully pointed out that there must be more sources to support the claim that reverse racism is a real social phenomenon 2936:

argument I made and was blocked for a week immediately afterward. Your answer is also there, as El_C said "Assume there was an error rather than an intentional attempt to mislead". Please don't try to justify your absolutely unjustifiable "welcome" message to a

1729:

because "An edit war occurs "when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions" (the very first sentence in that page). All I did was some civil discussion. Sure you are not forced to apologize, no one needs

1182:

Because, your more moderate version contained doubts about the existence of reverse racism, and used the word "alleged" for it. However, the last source I provided clearly states: "most agree that some cases of reverse discrimination exist" on page 2948.

3093:. If I were you, I would redraft it, by greatly trimming and condensing. You need to display an awareness of the overall problem and a willingness to commit to correction. That's it. A full account with all the details of all the disputes is not needed. 3812:

You'll note I'm not going to unblock them, because I think they're a problematic tenditious editor who is making this a battleground. I'm not endorsing an unblock here, merely saying that another admin can use their judgement without needing my input.

3348:

2833:

Of course, it was already pretty obvious regarding your super fast track indefinite block, not even bothering to check to whom were those "cavalier use of slurs and PA" referred to. And you're still pinging me in my own talk page? I swear were on

2790:

Thanks for "putting time, reading them thoroughly and answering all these cases one by one". Wait a minute, whose "talk page" were we arguing in? Mine, yours, or his? Yes it's not chill and that's why I deleted it quickly after El_C pointed out

3519:. Maybe my brain doesn't have enough capability, but I see no relationship between these two arguments and that specific sentence. I have also asked you "pray tell, how it's related to the discussion above and what it's supposed to imply?" 242: 3522:, which you refused to answer. You know what, as long as I have proper RSs and no logical arguments against me is provided, I continue to edit, even if that means confronting one million opposite views (with zero logical argument). 2893:. If you want to apologize, apologize for not having the sense to realize that book is garbage. The only way I can begin to see you getting out of this is agreeing to a topic ban relating to politics and history after 1932. 2986:

are Marxist tools. If you do not own the book, what toilet did you pull the citation from? If you do own the book, how did you find the info you needed to cite without discovering that the book is utterly insane garbage?

3051:

I just googled something like black lives matter+marxism and it appeared. No I don't own the book. Repeating for the nth time: I do not want to use that source, and I apologized minutes after I realized the mess I had

3144:)? Where did I push for a conspiracy theory please provide a diff. When did I use slurs against anyone other than me please provide a diff. When did I make a legal threat please provide a diff. When did I edit war on 334:

For accusing that editor of "lying" in your very next edit, you have been blocked for 48 hours. I'm not sure where you're getting that they're lying about Farsi being their mother tongue (evidence only in the form of

2462:. The first sentence in this section, exactly under the title is "See also: Right-wing terrorism". Please explain, isn't it POVly implying that that the far right politics in the UK from 2010 onward is terrorism? 1024:

Hi! take a look at the talk page and add whatever you consider necessary instead of using these useless warning tags. You could also start by actually taking a look at the links you just provided above. Thanks.

1067:

because you apparently have no idea what warring actually is. If you see any problems with 12 references that I had provided, you're free to express your concerns in the talk page of that article, not here.

2817:, Excuse me for not wanting to answer every one of your 11 point agenda, I have other things to do ya know. If the reviewing admin would like to do so, they can, but don't expect it. We're just volunteers. 3515:

and you said that "The idea that there's a meaningful decrease in white people because of interracial marriages (a belief in the white genocide conspiracy theory) assumes the racist myth of the one-drop

1846:"tilt Knowledge away from reality and verifiable facts"(Citation needed) Beautiful lies. Stick to them. Deprecate Telegraph. Occupy Fox. Forgive my bizarre thought patterns. Have fun with your majority. 2472:, the edit summary in this revert speaks for itself: Your actions in white washing the issue of racism against whites is strikingly alarming". So what does it speak? One user deleted the whole article 135:

to curtail disruption in articles related to post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed. Before continuing to make edits that involve this topic, please read the full description of these sanctions

3501:". is "information that would only be relevant if the conspiracy theory was true"? From which part of this sentence do you make that conclusion? Other than that, isn't it the exact sentence in an RS ( 437:

after this very warning. Stop making use of bad faith terms like "lying" and "deceive" — you are not getting it. Assume there was an error rather than an intentional attempt to mislead. Please stop

2011:

against ... myself? Anyway, I don't challenge that closure; all I say is to change that comment, quick and dirty. (Absolutely irrelevant and maybe not worth spending time to read, but apparently

3992:, among others. These are not typical of NOTHERE users to the best of my knowledge, but exactly the contrary. Again, if there are any ambiguities or questions, please ask me to clarify. Thanks. 177:. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 3864:

And yes, I admitted that I had edited tendentiously, and I endorsed a TBAN. That's all I could do at this point. I'll do my best to avoid even marginally unnecessary interactions and drama.

3392: 3601:). What I meant was that while his mother tongue is Persian, he tried to deceive other users by pretending that he couldn't understand a Persian source (I explained everything long ago in 3533:. Also keep in mind that I only added a sentence to an article's talk page. I pay a lot more attention to the credibility of the sources when I want to add them to the articles themselves. 3475:, your strong feelings about anti-white racism (which is globally and and historically insignificant compared to the atrocities committed against black people) are resulting in edits that 919: 2592:"the source they cited to call BLM Marxist is a hyper-McCarthyian conspiracy theorist work asserting that Marxists have been infiltrating the government and that their influences" True. 1045:

Calling this post useless is a problem. You are re-imaging the entire article and forcing your version in. WP is built upon consensus. You do not have consensus for these major changes.

2510: 911: 904: 896: 892: 360:

If you keep accusing them of lying while blocked, I will revoke your talk page access. I'm not sure what you expect me to learn from those two diffs — whatever it is, I don't get it.

3539:... Thanks for providing this diff so that everyone can judge if Sangdeboeuf's action in deleting the article was appropriate or I was right in undoing it. (Another related diff is 174: 136: 3525:

There are no "severe concerns" about my competency to identify reliable sources. I promise I am 100% capable of that. I've been doing this for my whole life. The point is that I

3497:

Ian, why don't you actually put time and read everything correctly before making comments? I appreciate that you say I was polite, I really appreciate. But, please explain how "

3062:

Also feel free to use as many "oh"s as you want. Just please have in mind that keeping this section tidy could actually help keeping the small chances of its fair review alive.

891:

You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

226:!! The best part was your reply "So you copy-paste this message without attribution? Please provide details about what template you used to post this notice. Thank you." !!! :) 789: 97: 90: 2961:

Are you really going to argue that you cited a source you knew nothing about, that you didn't even examine in any way beyond luckily finding the one page you wanted to cite?

3140:

and I get 48 hours for calling some one a liar (100% exactly like Ian and even less harsh) and now indefed for using "R-slur" against myself in my own talk page (which was

2296:

For whoever reads this:Please spend time and thoroughly read the links provided and ask me for clarification if anything is unclear. I answer to the accusations in the ANI

1556:"I've read it multiple times, have you?" When someone asks you to read something and your response suggests that they themselves have not, that shows a lack of good faith. 3089:

Ms96, I'll spare you the discourtesy of declining your request. I will leave that likely outcome for another admin. Your request is too lengthy and scattershot. It is too

1515: 2555: 1203:

Where one RS states that reverse racism "exists", and many many RS state that reverse racism does not "exist", we cannot state in WP's voice that it exists, per policy.

2989:

I don't actually care, there's no answer you can give to those questions that will help you besides "wow, yeah, a topic ban from history and politics is for the best."

2562:

Several editors have rejected this? And several have not. I didn't even start that discussion. "as of today"? I joined that discussion today! I actually made 2 edits (

2126: 2122: 3735:

others. I should have dropped the stick and not edited that tendentiously. I think I have already said what I had to. Genuinely appreciate if anyone could end this.

1334:

Where have you been in the past 4 days? Have you even bothered taking a look at the talk page at all? Do you have any objections to the sources? or the discussions?

2321:

Sentence: "Some research suggest that fears of white extinction are provoked by demographic shifts, since the white population is in decline in the US and Europe".

3458:

on another editor... regardless of how much you try to play Iago as a sympathetic tragic hero, you're still playing the villain until you choose a different role.

1089:

concerns here, not on the article TP, according to guidelines. I used an info template instead of a warning template as you have few edits. You have not violated

2574:"in response to being warned about edit warring for reverting my close they responded by attacking the editor who warned them". GOD! It's in front of your eyes! 1613:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to 1266:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to 3320:. I'm doing my best to present a proper yet short overview of the story. If anything is ambiguous or unclear, please ask me for further clarification. Thanks. 3470:

The only way out of an indefinite block at this point is to agree to a topic ban from (at a minimum) politics, (better yet) history also, if not race as well.

4055:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

3383:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2762:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1750:

Let's see, you have 399 edits, and Binksternet has 329,000 edits. Who would you suspect has a better grasp on what edit warring is, on general principles?

536:

Yes, I wish all of that was error, but errors don't happen that often. He kept insisting on that issue for 2-3 days and repeated his speech like 4-5 times.

3047:

in google books for me. I think it might hide random pages at different instances, maybe for different IPs, I have zero technical information about that.

2545: 733:

who has already been blocked for vandalism and non-neutral edit warring on Iran-related wiki pages, for edit warring on the Administrators' page, and?

3499:

Some research suggest that fears of white extinction are provoked by demographic shifts, since the white population is in decline in the US and Europe

2511:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/how-the-black-lives-matter-movement-went-mainstream/2020/06/09/201bd6e6-a9c6-11ea-9063-e69bd6520940_story.html

1142:. You must stop edit warring with multiple editors, and your proposed changes must be discussed on the article talk page and receive consensus there. 3986:

best way I could in the previous request and I'm not repeating it here, so I only quote the diffs showing my good faith in collaborating with others

2633:"the suggestions of topic bans in multiple areas"? By who? User:SharabSalam? who retired himself when he was on the verge of TBANs in multiple areas 3606: 2459: 61: 990:, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a 2170: 927:(I am not singling anyone out. I am notifying any of the last three editors to that talk page if they have not been notified in the past year.) - 2676:

Did I ever say White genocide conspiracy theory is real? Have you actually read what I did or decided merely based on what others implied I did?

1706:

a sharp warning to stop disrupting Knowledge or else the organization will take protective measures by blocking you. That's the important part.

844:

Thanks. I see "It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date", but did you see any problems with any of my edits?

1656: 1309: 2692:

accusations against me. I was wondering if the reviewing admin would mind putting time, reading them thoroughly and answering all these cases

2330:

guardian: "Where America goes, Europe follows 30 years later. There is a potential for whites to become a minority in some European countries"

922:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 3654:

After almost 3 weeks, I think it's time that someone takes some actions. This indefinite block was unquestionably based on misunderstandings

3414: 3145: 2525: 1610: 1511: 240:

Attributing is important. At the end of the notification there is a hidden comment that says

2725:

2) I am not going to respond to your points one by one (and I can assure you that you won't find any other reviewing admin who will either).

1647:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

1300:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

1005:. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the 982:

other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge this is known as "

556:

I don't know what you're talking about. Please just wait between responses for me to reply. I'm getting tired of all these edit conflicts.

2500: 3529:

jumped into that talk page and it all turned out to be a serious mistake. I have already apologized for that like 5,6 times. Please read

4040: 3368: 2747: 2177: 1372: 808: 154: 2728:

3) This request does not convince me that unblocking you would be to the benefit of Knowledge, and ultimately that's all that matters.

2556:

https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/black-lives-matter-is-marxist-its-claimed-in-lisburn-council-row-39313482.html

2550: 2540: 1938:

and tone it down a few notches. And you should not use the word "retarded" in such a cavalier way. Try to be respectful. Stop editing

3940: 3260: 2251: 45: 3502: 2535: 2520: 2325: 3704: 2481:.) What did I do wrong? Was that article non-notable? unnecessary? Shouldn't I have reverted their edit? Should it be deleted now? 2478:. The article is now alive, and even better than what it was. (The same user tried to delete information from 1804 Haiti massacre 3821: 3763: 3401: 2825: 2782: 2380: 2200: 2135: 866: 599:) rather than resort to these problematic, poorly-documented shortcuts which are far from a substitution to substantive reports. 2439:(please put time and take a look) and now I'm blocked because of pointing out the crystal clear non-neutrality of that article? 915: 128: 3512:. Objective3000 objected to this because "There is no white race. The concept that it is heading toward extinction is racist" 2515: 2613:

about the contents of articles, that's gonna make it hard to see you as here for reasons other than building an encyclopedia

816: 162: 3025: 2733: 1506:

Welcome to Knowledge. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to

1217:

I'm 100% agreed with this first logical argument I've come across here within days. Will try to find more sources though.

2387:

our results provide the strongest evidence so far that racial preferences operate and reverse discrimination is practiced

3150:

And I highly appreciate that Boing concluded that those accusations, at least, don't "firmly" convince them to indef me

1652: 1618: 1305: 1271: 2546:

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/rita-panahi/blm-are-radical-neomarxists/news-story/8ed22f8b57042417bf23745dba70ad7c

1507: 796: 779: 142: 132: 1955:

All you said is true. A great help for me again. I deleted that word. Could you please do me another favor and read

4026: 3935: 3912:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3354: 3255: 3232:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

2337: 2246: 2223:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

900: 812: 158: 3059:

anyone do anything? "Content-based claims"? I exactly responded to all points argued in the ANI thread, did I not?

2899:

than gaslighting. Though your choice in sources on history, I suppose it's a pitiable given that you'd do that.

3913: 3505:)? No this was not explained to me by other users. Among people who objected to it was Summerphd who said it was 3233: 2224: 2165: 2160: 1725:

Thanks for this reply which is an obvious evidence that you have a weak, if any, understanding of the meaning of

1662: 1315: 1002: 824: 306:

So let me ask only once more, was he not lying?! So help me understand which English word is used now? Also, see

170: 293:

If you accuse another editor of "vandalism" and of "lying" you will be sanctioned. Don't do this again, please.

3907: 3755:

If an another admin wishes to unblock, they may go ahead, but a politics T-Ban is a must, I prefer indefinite.

3227: 3103: 2729: 2297: 2218: 1984: 987: 820: 166: 1764:

Typical mean and empty argument made only for the purpose of personal attacks. This isn't anything new to me.

3834: 3788: 3305:

I do understand that I didn't act in the most appropriate way. I'm especially regretful about my last edits

2488: 2054: 1875: 1837: 1797: 1755: 1472: 1438: 1400: 1362: 1324: 1147: 1098: 1050: 1014: 799:

is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means

591:

Thanks, I appreciate that. I just think you need to follow the correct procedures: for possible disruption (

145:

is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means

2379:

in which a white male has unjustifiably been excluded from consideration and has a right to compensation."

2526:

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/rudy-giuliani-calls-black-lives-matter-a-marxist-organization-2020-07-01

2436: 1648: 1606: 1301: 1259: 1208: 1162: 1006: 983: 975: 804: 150: 2530: 651:— for the moment, I want as little interaction as possible with them, in general. But you may list it at 4022: 3488: 3350: 3204: 3034: 2904: 2885: 2081: 1711: 1671: 1562: 1524: 995: 836: 250: 213: 183: 2771: 2501:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/12/make-no-mistake-blm-radical-neo-marxist-political-movement/

2350:"a loose legal threat": What I said was this: "accusing me of synthing and misrepresenting is a libel" 3506: 2975: 2311:

User_talk:Ivanvector#I_synthesized_disparate_sources_to_suggest_a_conclusion_the_sources_do_not_state

2310: 1957:

User_talk:Ivanvector#I_synthesized_disparate_sources_to_suggest_a_conclusion_the_sources_do_not_state

1956: 618: 2551:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jun/25/patrisse-cullors-black-lives-matter-co-founder-fea/

2541:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jun/29/editorial-black-lives-matter-is-rooted-in-a-soulle/

2344:

And now I understand WP is not for adding material based on sources, but whatever 'consensus' likes.

3580: 2979: 2962: 2363: 1867: 1625:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 1622: 1614: 1278:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 1275: 1267: 1060: 991: 721: 2866:

It doesn't matter if you immediately apologized for the book being published by Createspace, that

2599:. So I don't think "That alone should result in at least a topic ban from all political articles". 3954: 3830: 3807: 3784: 3418: 3274: 3003: 2469: 2265: 2050: 2012: 1871: 1833: 1808: 1793: 1751: 1468: 1434: 1396: 1358: 1355: 1320: 1143: 1094: 1046: 1010: 803:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the

800: 149:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the

146: 3393:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1041#User Ms96 civil right-wing POV pushing

3049:

I am willing to email a screenshot of it in the google books to you or anyone else, per request.

2536:

https://disrn.com/news/video-surfaces-of-black-lives-matter-founder-saying-were-trained-marxists

2521:

https://nypost.com/2020/07/01/the-agenda-of-black-lives-matter-is-far-different-from-the-slogan/

3674:

I have already expressed my regret multiple times please explain if anything else is necessary.

4021:

usually work because if your previous request had been compelling, you'd be unblocked by now.

3542:

where the same user tried to delete information from 1804 Haiti massacre, which I also undid).

3090: 2390: 1204: 1179: 1158: 742: 73: 3148:

please provide a diff. Have I even edited the article itself? If yes, please provide a diff.

1987:, I would advise you to withdraw, because you are risking sanctions at this time for editing 4049: 3484: 3439: 3426: 3377: 3200: 3030: 2938: 2900: 2756: 2183: 2076: 1722: 1707: 1681: 1667: 1557: 1533: 1519: 881:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

831: 764:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

340: 246: 209: 179: 2516:

https://nypost.com/2020/07/01/rudy-giuliani-blm-a-marxist-group-planning-to-destroy-police/

373:

supported by the provided source. You mean the edit I made in my talk page by "next edit"?

120:

it contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge. It does

3814: 3783:

that Ms96's personality is conducive to editing in a collegial project such as Knowledge.

3777: 3756: 3731: 3576: 3530: 3396: 3188: 2818: 2775: 2193: 2130: 1890:

A Tribute to My Left Fellas in the Talk Page of the Carcass of a Canceled Rural Psychopath

1644: 1297: 674:

Thanks. I meant he has a habit of mentioning the number of users' edits. Forget about it.

652: 57:!! You're invited: learn how to edit Knowledge in under an hour. Hope to see you there! 2375:"Few deny that reverse discrimination is sometimes caused by preferential policies, and 2331: 3435: 3422: 3421:

to include information that would only be relevant if the conspiracy theory was true.

3021: 2877: 2774:

was self referential? Assuming it was, the use of the R-slur is still super not chill.

2606: 2315:

ALL I WANTED TO ADD IS BASICALLY A WORD-BY-WORD COPY OF SOURCES, WITH VERY FEW CHANGES.

2309:

No. I've been here since 2014. The exact change I wanted to make is well summarized in

1992: 1263: 1247: 979: 655:, if it isn't there already. As for those aforementioned purported personal attacks by 596: 505: 336: 874: 758: 110: 3480: 3472: 3430: 3176: 2890:

lack the competence necessary to edit articles relating to history, politics, or race

2889: 2313:(please put time and read carefully; the sentence and its sources also listed below) 2008: 1980: 1789: 1090: 592: 509: 344: 29: 3671:

I will never again use any sort of slurs against even myself, as said in my request.

3013: 2336:

powersearch: "In the United States, the white share of the population is declining"

1988: 1939: 1726: 1064: 738: 730: 501: 69: 3661:

Yes I do accept I edited tendentiously, and immediately stopped after El_C warned

2918: 2881: 2869: 2505: 2925:

and I apologized for that. I have no intention to use or even read it, in fact.

2324:

psmag: "New research finds that such fears are provoked by demographic shifts"

611:

I reserve reporting to ANI as a last resort. But aren't these personal attacks

3691:

I have also provided links proving my good faith in collaborating with others

3562: 3550: 3476: 3465: 3017: 3009: 2971: 2452:

real, I have not pushed this claim and only added some content about Zimbabwe.

2424: 2400: 1979:

Ms96, please don't use legal terms like "libel," because it comes across as a

208:

When did you read this? You haven't received this notification before AFAIK.--

3844:

this regard; wondering if they could avoid any further interactions with me.

3553: 3443:

would only be relevant if the CT was true (no matter what anyone said), plus

2672:"Does the existence of these alerts automatically mean I edited disruptively? 2406: 2084: 1811:; now I say it to you and all other stalkers: have fun with your falsehoods. 3993: 3918: 3865: 3845: 3736: 3727: 3708: 3627: 3598: 3321: 3238: 3155: 3117: 3107: 3094: 3063: 2994: 2942: 2839: 2814: 2795: 2696: 2229: 2091: 2020: 2004: 1996: 1960: 1952: 1943: 1893: 1847: 1812: 1765: 1731: 1686: 1571: 1537: 1448: 1414: 1376: 1335: 1218: 1184: 1109: 1069: 1026: 1001:

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to

944: 845: 675: 666: 622: 608: 600: 572: 567: 557: 537: 533: 525: 513: 481: 460: 451: 442: 414: 394: 374: 369: 361: 348: 313: 303: 294: 260: 227: 195: 3667:

I did not push for any sort of theory at all, provide diff if there is any.

3536: 3444: 2151: 643: 194:

I have carefully read this before, wish I could say the same about you (;

3423:

This was explained repeatedly by a variety of users, but you didn't listen

2040: 393:

Those diffs show he is disruptively deleting whatever he desires. WP:CoI.

3581:

United States Supreme Court, GRUTTER v. BOLLINGER et al.(2003) No. 02-241

2983: 2873: 2489:

Talk:Black_Lives_Matter#Why_is_Marxist_not_even_mentioned_in_the_article?

2176:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

1410: 783: 339:, please), but I view it as a provocation. Please feel free to launch an 2180:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 2125:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

1633:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;

1502: 1286:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;

970: 3559: 3175:

were completely wrong although claiming it was a mistake in a way that

2605:

Wondering how Ian.Thomson is boldly and shamelessly pointing out their

2418: 2389:

in the undergraduate admissions process at the University of Virginia.

2370:

on the existence of discriminatory policies against whites in Zimbabwe.

1786:"you have a weak, if any, understanding of the meaning of edit warring" 1433:

You can't fool me, that's not a space ship, it's some spaced-out shit.

3308:

in my talk page before being blocked which were, obviously by mistake

2531:

https://www.quora.com/Is-Black-Lives-Matter-a-Marxist-influenced-group

3503:

New research finds that such fears are provoked by demographic shifts

729:

anyway). So, a few days ago I reported these users, one of which is

3703:

I do accept I have a POV, everybody does. But, not complying to the

3664:(before my ban). I promise I will refrain from this sort of editing. 2888:

on some sort of Marxist conspiracy demonstrates that you completely

2442:

Other than that, what I added was almost exclusively about Zimbabwe

459:

I hadn't seen my talk page and hence your message before that edit.

3556: 2932:. "what else would you call their statement but lying" this is the 2413:

The Reverse Discrimination Controversy. A Moral and Legal Analysis.

2412: 524:"uw-disruptive" templates — that was the wrong way to go about it. 20: 3431:

severe concerns about your competency to identify reliable sources

1518:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

3181:

You accused someone of lying while working for Iranian government

2666:? (I have most likely less than 15 COVID-related edits in total) 2475:

deeming it somehow unnecessary or non-notable and I reverted it

1788:

is indeed a "mean and empty argument", and perilously close to a

4030: 4007: 3879: 3859: 3838: 3824: 3792: 3766: 3750: 3722: 3641: 3492: 3406: 3358: 3335: 3208: 3169: 3131: 3097: 3077: 3038: 2956: 2908: 2853: 2828: 2809: 2785: 2737: 2710: 2203: 2140: 2105: 2058: 2034: 1999: 1974: 1946: 1907: 1879: 1861: 1841: 1826: 1801: 1779: 1759: 1745: 1715: 1700: 1675: 1585: 1565: 1551: 1527: 1476: 1462: 1442: 1428: 1404: 1390: 1366: 1349: 1328: 1232: 1212: 1198: 1166: 1151: 1123: 1102: 1083: 1054: 1040: 1018: 958: 937: 887:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

859: 839: 770:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

746: 689: 669: 636: 603: 586: 560: 551: 528: 516: 495: 474: 454: 445: 428: 408: 388: 364: 351: 327: 297: 274: 254: 235: 217: 203: 187: 77: 2596:

after I realized it was published through Amazon's Createspace

641:

Sorry, I decline to further engage that RfC in any way, due to

2997:

is not the same as me pointing out a demonstrable lie as such.

1643:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

1510:

while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on

1296:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

657: 124:

imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

2963:

This is supposed to demonstrate competency on your part, how?

3898: 3605:). And it turned out that I was correct (the whole story is 3468:

doesn't help when all your actions are public record here.

3218: 2209: 2150: 3597:"? My mother tongue is also Persian, hon (have a glance at 3177:

raises other concerns about their ability to read and write

2568:) there (and 2 typo edits), all of which were made 'today'. 2495:

below) . have you actually taken a look at that discussion?

3008:

the reviewing admin is in no way obligated to engage in a

2377:

most agree that some cases of reverse discrimination exist

4037:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

3365:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2744:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

661:, I'm not seeing any in those diffs you cited, so please 4057:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3385:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3189:

I am calling you now for insisting you were got blocked

2764:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2460:

Far-right_politics_in_the_United_Kingdom#Current_(2010–)

720:

Hello, I just wanted to mention how the Wiki page about

3990: 3987: 3968: 3964: 3958: 3949: 3945: 3931: 3927: 3923: 3698: 3695: 3692: 3682: 3662: 3655: 3620: 3594: 3591: 3540: 3520: 3517: 3513: 3510: 3509:. That's not what I think; another user also thinks so 3455: 3452: 3448: 3391:

If anyone does decide to review this, please first see

3318: 3315: 3312: 3309: 3306: 3288: 3284: 3278: 3269: 3265: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3184: 3180: 3151: 3137: 2966: 2792: 2663: 2659: 2652: 2646: 2640: 2634: 2617: 2614: 2597: 2566: 2563: 2479: 2476: 2473: 2446: 2443: 2351: 2279: 2275: 2269: 2260: 2256: 2242: 2238: 2234: 1936: 648: 615: 612: 434: 310: 307: 223: 788:

The specific details of these sanctions are described

737:

got blocked immediately, without even a discussion! --

3010:

dialogue that creates the appearance of justification

2425:

LIMITS TO THE JUSTIFICATION OF REVERSE DISCRIMINATION

3906:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

3477:

white supremacists see as support for their ideology

3226:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

2578:

I was warned for 'edit warring' for actually making

2391:

Reverse discrimination by the numbers, Lerner et al.

2217:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

1638:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 1536:Hi. Not sure which edit you mean, please specify. 1291:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 752:General sanctions alert for Covid-19 related pages 259:WOW, Creative Commons ... must be interesting!!!! 3697:, and unhesitatingly accepting logical arguments 3317:, and unhesitatingly accepting logical arguments 3024:. Your content-based claims have been addressed 3014:argument that creates the appearance of "winning" 2407:The Unresolved Problems of Reverse Discrimination 778:A community discussion has authorised the use of 413:Alos take a look at his block log and its reason. 3434:degree among almost all editors, but that's why 2970:Marxists in Power," a chapter that explains how 2664:refuses to clarify their grounds for this action 3989:and unhesitatingly accepting logical arguments 3569: 2123:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 782:for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 ( 17:Ms91, you are invited on a Knowledge Adventure! 2915:I DID NOT CHECK THE CREDIBILITY OF THAT SOURCE 815:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 617:? Just a bit confused. Could you please bring 161:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 3197:you made racist and paranoid personal attacks 3187:. You didn't just call someone a liar (like 3142:obviously mistaken to be against someone else 2506:https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/ 2169:from editing because it appears that you are 2075:You have to make a complete signed new post. 1395:Super-secret space business, you understand. 8: 3483:, this should be a learning moment for you. 3473:No matter how much you want to be non-racist 2674:"clear POV-pushing and conspiracy nonsense" 1935:Ms96, don't be a timesink. Respect consensus 1108:POTUS". You really need to chill out buddy. 450:What conflict of interest? What disruption? 3684:in the article's talk page and had exactly 910:For additional information, please see the 895:is in effect. Any administrator may impose 441:responding constsntly so that I can reply. 2607:extremely unfair and harsh personal attack 2401:What is Wrong with Reverse Discrimination? 1655:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to 1609:according to the reverts you have made on 1308:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to 1262:according to the reverts you have made on 907:, when making edits related to the topic. 595:) or for a possible conflict of interest ( 1605:You currently appear to be engaged in an 1258:You currently appear to be engaged in an 986:" and is usually seen as obstructing the 96:Hi. We're into the last five days of the 118:Please read this notification carefully: 3106:I appreciate the time you put, thanks. 2644:COVID-19 started from Sweden and France 2366:. I simply did not try to base my edit 1354:(I took a 4-day vacation on Mars.) See 774:Please carefully read this information: 2582:edit? Yes I made personal attacks ... 2435:of this opposite view is reflected in 2127:User Ms96 civil right-wing POV pushing 1447:This conversation made my day. Thanks! 899:on editors who do not strictly follow 662: 3415:Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory 3146:Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory 3016:. They are not obligated to let you 2872:conspiracy theorist work blaming the 2594:I apologized for my fault immediately 2419:Reverse Discrimination as Unjustified 2364:Talk:Reverse_racism#Mugabeism_in_Lede 1611:Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory 1512:Talk:White genocide conspiracy theory 7: 3545:Yes, I hate reverse discrimination. 2921:conspiracy theorist work ..." which 1659:. If you engage in an edit war, you 1312:. If you engage in an edit war, you 3677:I did not "edit war". I undid only 2723:1) I read all that, I honestly did. 2638:Israeli sites are mostly unreliable 2121:There is currently a discussion at 1138:I have restored the article to the 912:guidance on discretionary sanctions 2995:seeing different politics as a lie 2660:my last edit in that area in 6 May 2090:Good point, I didn't know. Thanks 1157:to effective collaboration on WP. 14: 2917:and did not know it was "a hyper- 2171:not here to build an encyclopedia 1991:about a subject that falls under 1657:request temporary page protection 1310:request temporary page protection 343:, but you should really read the 3466:Telling us the card says "MOOPS" 2116: 1600: 1501: 1253: 969: 873: 867:White genocide conspiracy theory 757: 109: 44: 28: 3624:their ability to read and write 3622:? "raises other concerns about 3136:One guy gets only 72 hours for 2678:"cavalier use of slurs and PA" 2575: 1617:with others, to avoid editing 1270:with others, to avoid editing 978:. You appear to be repeatedly 68:This message was delivered by 1: 4031:00:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC) 3481:If that is not your intention 3179:. That's not what you did. 1892:, 20:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC). 1093:. But, you are edit warring. 1003:lose their editing privileges 4008:19:10, 17 October 2020 (UTC) 3688:edits in the article itself! 3602: 3022:shifting the blame to others 2929: 2868:you thought to cite a hyper- 2653:posted this alert in 16 June 2609:(If you continue completely 275:23:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 255:22:17, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 236:20:42, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 218:20:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 204:20:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 188:20:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC) 62:Play The Knowledge Adventure 59: 3910:, who declined the request. 3230:, who declined the request. 3153:. Feels like a divine court 2993:You getting in trouble for 2941:with 3 edits (repeatedly?) 2626:YES, BUT AGAINST MYSELF!!! 2362:Please spend time and read 2221:, who declined the request. 716:Coronavirus in Iran/Saff V. 4073: 3359:01:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC) 3193:for calling someone a liar 2838:talk page, no one else's. 2688:I spent time and answered 2070: 1888:"... by Beyond My Ken, in 1792:. You should watch that. 905:page-specific restrictions 747:17:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC) 131:has authorised the use of 98:Women in Red World Contest 91:Women in Red World Contest 78:17:36, 28 April 2014 (UTC) 42: 4041:guide to appealing blocks 3880:22:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC) 3860:22:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC) 3839:22:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC) 3825:21:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC) 3793:21:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC) 3767:20:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC) 3751:20:11, 31 July 2020 (UTC) 3723:12:21, 30 July 2020 (UTC) 3642:08:11, 14 July 2020 (UTC) 3493:22:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 3407:13:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC) 3369:guide to appealing blocks 3336:20:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 3209:22:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 3170:10:37, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 3132:07:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC) 3098:15:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 3078:09:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 3039:08:55, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2957:08:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2909:08:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2854:08:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2829:08:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2810:08:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2786:07:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2770:You expect me to believe 2748:guide to appealing blocks 2738:15:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2711:07:06, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2204:01:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2178:guide to appealing blocks 2141:00:59, 12 July 2020 (UTC) 2106:18:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 2085:18:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 2059:22:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 2035:21:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 2000:21:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1975:21:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1947:21:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1908:20:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1880:20:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1862:20:11, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1842:20:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1827:19:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1802:19:04, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1780:18:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1760:18:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1746:18:30, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1716:18:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1701:18:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1676:18:09, 11 July 2020 (UTC) 1586:11:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 1566:11:06, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 1552:10:53, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 1528:10:42, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 1477:02:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 1463:22:50, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1443:22:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1429:22:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1409:But keep in mind the new 1405:22:04, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1391:21:54, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1367:21:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1350:21:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1329:21:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1233:14:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 1213:13:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 1199:04:26, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 1167:00:54, 21 June 2020 (UTC) 1152:21:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1124:20:57, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1103:20:49, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1084:20:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1055:20:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1041:20:16, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 1019:20:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC) 959:18:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 938:18:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 860:17:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 840:17:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC) 690:16:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 670:16:05, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 637:09:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 604:16:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 587:16:15, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 561:16:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 552:16:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 529:16:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 517:16:13, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 496:16:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 475:16:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 455:16:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 446:15:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 429:15:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 409:15:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 389:15:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 365:15:48, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 352:15:46, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 345:guide to appealing blocks 328:15:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 298:15:38, 4 March 2020 (UTC) 3612:Have you just called me 3564:and people hate it, too: 3413:Your entire activity at 3018:control the conversation 2624:"use of slurs and PA's" 2576:User_talk:Ms96#July_2020 1884:Reference: ..."the vast 1623:try to reach a consensus 1373:exhausting business trip 1276:try to reach a consensus 649:related attack on myself 621:into conclusion as well? 231: 199: 3055:Pray tell, Where did I 1993:discretionary sanctions 1649:appropriate noticeboard 1413:are anything but safe. 1302:appropriate noticeboard 943:Thanks for clarifying. 916:Arbitration Committee's 893:discretionary sanctions 104:IRANPOL GS notification 3903: 3694:, admitting my faults 3603:User_talk:Ms96#Warning 3585: 3537:"your strong feelings" 3314:, admitting my faults 3223: 2976:the Head Start Program 2930:User_talk:Ms96#Warning 2437:Reverse discrimination 2214: 2155: 1371:It looks more like an 988:normal editing process 809:standards of behaviour 155:standards of behaviour 3955:change block settings 3902: 3275:change block settings 3222: 2886:Civil rights movement 2266:change block settings 2213: 2188:Your reason here ~~~~ 2154: 1514:. Take a look at the 3445:your strong feelings 2071:You can't fix a ping 980:reverting or undoing 976:welcome to Knowledge 901:Knowledge's policies 865:Important notice re 817:editing restrictions 805:purpose of Knowledge 163:editing restrictions 151:purpose of Knowledge 129:community discussion 3894:New unblock request 3705:POV of the majority 3104:Boing! said Zebedee 2967:you cited page 368, 2730:Boing! said Zebedee 2651:Or Doug Weller who 2448:. I mean, while it 722:coronavirus in Iran 512:is your next step. 500:If a user is being 3904: 3224: 3185:they speak Persian 2470:Racism in Zimbabwe 2215: 2156: 1809:another user today 1653:dispute resolution 1306:dispute resolution 3449:anti-white racism 3154: 3007: 2980:Section 8 housing 2112:Discussion notice 1985:WP:CLOSECHALLENGE 1508:assume good faith 1063:. And of course, 1007:three-revert rule 797:general sanctions 780:general sanctions 510:Admin noticeboard 143:General sanctions 133:general sanctions 86: 85: 80: 4064: 4054: 4048: 4023:NinjaRobotPirate 4005: 3998: 3974: 3972: 3961: 3943: 3941:deleted contribs 3901: 3877: 3870: 3857: 3850: 3829:Got it, thanks! 3819: 3811: 3781: 3761: 3748: 3741: 3720: 3713: 3639: 3632: 3583: 3419:politely pushing 3382: 3376: 3351:NinjaRobotPirate 3333: 3326: 3294: 3292: 3281: 3263: 3261:deleted contribs 3221: 3167: 3160: 3149: 3129: 3122: 3075: 3068: 3001: 2990: 2954: 2947: 2851: 2844: 2823: 2807: 2800: 2780: 2761: 2755: 2708: 2701: 2657:1.5 months after 2285: 2283: 2272: 2254: 2252:deleted contribs 2212: 2198: 2191: 2120: 2119: 2103: 2096: 2079: 2032: 2025: 2017:call others liar 1972: 1965: 1905: 1898: 1866:Not "majority", 1859: 1852: 1824: 1817: 1777: 1770: 1743: 1736: 1698: 1691: 1628:Points to note: 1604: 1603: 1583: 1576: 1560: 1549: 1542: 1522: 1505: 1460: 1453: 1426: 1419: 1388: 1381: 1347: 1340: 1281:Points to note: 1257: 1256: 1230: 1223: 1196: 1189: 1121: 1114: 1081: 1074: 1038: 1031: 973: 956: 949: 936: 933: 930: 877: 857: 850: 834: 761: 687: 680: 660: 646: 634: 627: 584: 577: 549: 542: 493: 486: 472: 465: 426: 419: 406: 399: 386: 379: 325: 318: 312:what are these? 272: 265: 113: 67: 64: 48: 41: 40: 37: 32: 25: 4072: 4071: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4060: 4052: 4046: 4045:, then use the 4034: 4011: 4001: 3994: 3962: 3952: 3938: 3921: 3914:blocking policy 3899: 3896: 3873: 3866: 3853: 3846: 3815: 3805: 3775: 3757: 3744: 3737: 3716: 3709: 3652: 3635: 3628: 3584: 3577:Clarence Thomas 3574: 3404: 3388: 3380: 3374: 3373:, then use the 3362: 3339: 3329: 3322: 3282: 3272: 3258: 3241: 3234:blocking policy 3219: 3163: 3156: 3125: 3118: 3071: 3064: 2988: 2950: 2943: 2847: 2840: 2819: 2803: 2796: 2776: 2767: 2759: 2753: 2752:, then use the 2741: 2715: 2704: 2697: 2680:Against myself? 2273: 2263: 2249: 2232: 2225:blocking policy 2210: 2207: 2206: 2194: 2181: 2174: 2148: 2138: 2117: 2114: 2099: 2092: 2077: 2073: 2039:You should try 2028: 2021: 1968: 1961: 1901: 1894: 1855: 1848: 1820: 1813: 1790:personal attack 1773: 1766: 1739: 1732: 1694: 1687: 1601: 1598: 1579: 1572: 1558: 1545: 1538: 1520: 1499: 1456: 1449: 1422: 1415: 1384: 1377: 1343: 1336: 1254: 1251: 1226: 1219: 1192: 1185: 1140:status quo ante 1117: 1110: 1077: 1070: 1059:Carefully read 1034: 1027: 967: 952: 945: 934: 931: 928: 925: 924: 878: 870: 853: 846: 832: 829: 828: 762: 754: 718: 683: 676: 656: 642: 630: 623: 580: 573: 545: 538: 489: 482: 468: 461: 422: 415: 402: 395: 382: 375: 347:closely first. 341:unblock request 321: 314: 291: 268: 261: 191: 190: 114: 106: 94: 87: 82: 81: 65: 60: 39: 38: 35: 33: 26: 23: 19: 12: 11: 5: 4070: 4068: 4035: 4018: 4014:Decline reason 3983: 3979:Request reason 3976: 3897: 3895: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3882: 3862: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3795: 3770: 3769: 3753: 3725: 3701: 3689: 3675: 3672: 3668: 3665: 3651: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3610: 3573: 3570: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3543: 3534: 3523: 3459: 3427:You kept going 3410: 3409: 3400: 3363: 3346: 3342:Decline reason 3303: 3299:Request reason 3296: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3060: 3053: 2998: 2991: 2965:Oh, wait, no, 2926: 2895: 2894: 2878:War on poverty 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2742: 2722: 2718:Decline reason 2714: 2713: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2649: 2628: 2619: 2600: 2587: 2569: 2559: 2558: 2553: 2548: 2543: 2538: 2533: 2528: 2523: 2518: 2513: 2508: 2503: 2497: 2496: 2482: 2463: 2453: 2440: 2429: 2428: 2422: 2416: 2410: 2404: 2398: 2397:other sources: 2383: 2372: 2371: 2360: 2354: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2334: 2328: 2322: 2318: 2317: 2307: 2294: 2290:Request reason 2287: 2208: 2175: 2158:You have been 2157: 2149: 2147: 2144: 2134: 2113: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 1983:. As for your 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1641: 1640: 1635: 1597: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1294: 1293: 1288: 1264:Reverse racism 1250: 1248:Reverse racism 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 966: 963: 962: 961: 879: 872: 871: 869: 863: 811:, or relevant 793: 787: 763: 756: 755: 753: 750: 717: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 693: 692: 663:quote directly 565: 564: 563: 521: 520: 519: 508:report on the 448: 411: 391: 355: 354: 331: 330: 290: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 157:, or relevant 115: 108: 107: 105: 102: 93: 88: 84: 83: 66: 51: 49: 34: 27: 22: 21: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4069: 4059: 4058: 4051: 4044: 4042: 4033: 4032: 4028: 4024: 4017: 4015: 4010: 4009: 4006: 4004: 3999: 3997: 3991: 3988: 3982: 3980: 3975: 3970: 3966: 3960: 3956: 3951: 3947: 3942: 3937: 3933: 3932:global blocks 3929: 3928:active blocks 3925: 3920: 3915: 3911: 3909: 3908:administrator 3893: 3881: 3878: 3876: 3871: 3869: 3863: 3861: 3858: 3856: 3851: 3849: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3836: 3832: 3831:Beyond My Ken 3828: 3827: 3826: 3823: 3820: 3818: 3809: 3808:Beyond My Ken 3804: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3785:Beyond My Ken 3779: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3768: 3765: 3762: 3760: 3754: 3752: 3749: 3747: 3742: 3740: 3733: 3729: 3726: 3724: 3721: 3719: 3714: 3712: 3706: 3702: 3699: 3696: 3693: 3690: 3687: 3683: 3680: 3676: 3673: 3669: 3666: 3663: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3656: 3649: 3643: 3640: 3638: 3633: 3631: 3625: 3621: 3619: 3615: 3611: 3608: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3593: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3582: 3578: 3563: 3560: 3557: 3554: 3551: 3548: 3544: 3541: 3538: 3535: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3521: 3518: 3514: 3511: 3508: 3507:WP:IRRELEVANT 3504: 3500: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3460: 3457: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3441: 3437: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3411: 3408: 3403: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3389: 3387: 3386: 3379: 3372: 3370: 3361: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3345: 3343: 3338: 3337: 3334: 3332: 3327: 3325: 3319: 3316: 3313: 3310: 3307: 3302: 3300: 3295: 3290: 3286: 3280: 3276: 3271: 3267: 3262: 3257: 3253: 3252:global blocks 3249: 3248:active blocks 3245: 3240: 3235: 3231: 3229: 3228:administrator 3210: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3192: 3186: 3182: 3178: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3168: 3166: 3161: 3159: 3152: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3130: 3128: 3123: 3121: 3114: 3109: 3105: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3096: 3092: 3079: 3076: 3074: 3069: 3067: 3061: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3036: 3032: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3005: 3004:edit conflict 2999: 2996: 2992: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2955: 2953: 2948: 2946: 2940: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2924: 2923:are my faults 2920: 2916: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2897: 2896: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2865: 2864: 2855: 2852: 2850: 2845: 2843: 2837: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2827: 2824: 2822: 2816: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2808: 2806: 2801: 2799: 2793: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2784: 2781: 2779: 2773: 2769: 2768: 2766: 2765: 2758: 2751: 2749: 2740: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2726: 2721: 2719: 2712: 2709: 2707: 2702: 2700: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2686: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2668: 2667: 2665: 2661: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2647: 2645: 2641: 2639: 2635: 2632: 2629: 2627: 2623: 2620: 2618: 2615: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2601: 2598: 2595: 2591: 2588: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2570: 2567: 2564: 2561: 2560: 2557: 2554: 2552: 2549: 2547: 2544: 2542: 2539: 2537: 2534: 2532: 2529: 2527: 2524: 2522: 2519: 2517: 2514: 2512: 2509: 2507: 2504: 2502: 2499: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2483: 2480: 2477: 2474: 2471: 2467: 2464: 2461: 2457: 2454: 2451: 2447: 2444: 2441: 2438: 2434: 2431: 2430: 2426: 2423: 2420: 2417: 2414: 2411: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2399: 2396: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2381: 2378: 2374: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2361: 2358: 2355: 2352: 2349: 2346: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2335: 2332: 2329: 2326: 2323: 2320: 2319: 2316: 2312: 2308: 2305: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2298: 2293: 2291: 2286: 2281: 2277: 2271: 2267: 2262: 2258: 2253: 2248: 2244: 2243:global blocks 2240: 2239:active blocks 2236: 2231: 2226: 2222: 2220: 2219:administrator 2205: 2202: 2199: 2197: 2189: 2185: 2179: 2172: 2168: 2167: 2163: 2162: 2153: 2145: 2143: 2142: 2137: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2111: 2107: 2104: 2102: 2097: 2095: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051:Beyond My Ken 2048: 2047: 2042: 2041:Conservapedia 2038: 2037: 2036: 2033: 2031: 2026: 2024: 2018: 2016: 2010: 2006: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1989:tendentiously 1986: 1982: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1973: 1971: 1966: 1964: 1958: 1954: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1899: 1897: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1872:Beyond My Ken 1869: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1860: 1858: 1853: 1851: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1834:Beyond My Ken 1830: 1829: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1818: 1816: 1810: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1794:Beyond My Ken 1791: 1787: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1778: 1776: 1771: 1769: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1752:Beyond My Ken 1749: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1742: 1737: 1735: 1728: 1724: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1699: 1697: 1692: 1690: 1683: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1665:from editing. 1664: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1595: 1587: 1584: 1582: 1577: 1575: 1570:Oh!! Thanks. 1569: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1548: 1543: 1541: 1535: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1504: 1496: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1469:Beyond My Ken 1466: 1465: 1464: 1461: 1459: 1454: 1452: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1440: 1436: 1435:Beyond My Ken 1432: 1431: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1420: 1418: 1412: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1397:Beyond My Ken 1394: 1393: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1382: 1380: 1374: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1359:Beyond My Ken 1357: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1341: 1339: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1321:Beyond My Ken 1319: 1318:from editing. 1317: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1279: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1249: 1246: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1224: 1222: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1190: 1188: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1144:Beyond My Ken 1141: 1137: 1136: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1115: 1113: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1075: 1073: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1039: 1037: 1032: 1030: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 999: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 972: 964: 960: 957: 955: 950: 948: 942: 941: 940: 939: 923: 921: 917: 913: 908: 906: 902: 898: 894: 889: 888: 886: 876: 868: 864: 862: 861: 858: 856: 851: 849: 842: 841: 838: 835: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 791: 785: 781: 776: 775: 771: 769: 760: 751: 749: 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 723: 715: 691: 688: 686: 681: 679: 673: 672: 671: 668: 664: 659: 654: 650: 645: 640: 639: 638: 635: 633: 628: 626: 620: 616: 613: 610: 607: 606: 605: 602: 598: 594: 590: 589: 588: 585: 583: 578: 576: 569: 566: 562: 559: 555: 554: 553: 550: 548: 543: 541: 535: 532: 531: 530: 527: 522: 518: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 498: 497: 494: 492: 487: 485: 478: 477: 476: 473: 471: 466: 464: 458: 457: 456: 453: 449: 447: 444: 440: 436: 432: 431: 430: 427: 425: 420: 418: 412: 410: 407: 405: 400: 398: 392: 390: 387: 385: 380: 378: 371: 368: 367: 366: 363: 359: 358: 357: 356: 353: 350: 346: 342: 338: 333: 332: 329: 326: 324: 319: 317: 311: 308: 305: 302: 301: 300: 299: 296: 288: 276: 273: 271: 266: 264: 258: 257: 256: 252: 248: 247:SharʿabSalam▼ 244: 239: 238: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 220: 219: 215: 211: 210:SharʿabSalam▼ 207: 206: 205: 201: 197: 193: 192: 189: 185: 181: 180:SharʿabSalam▼ 178: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 138: 134: 130: 125: 123: 119: 112: 103: 101: 99: 92: 89: 79: 75: 71: 63: 58: 56: 50: 47: 43: 31: 16: 4056: 4038: 4036: 4019: 4013: 4012: 4002: 4000: 3995: 3984: 3978: 3977: 3950:creation log 3917: 3905: 3874: 3872: 3867: 3854: 3852: 3847: 3816: 3758: 3745: 3743: 3738: 3717: 3715: 3710: 3685: 3678: 3653: 3636: 3634: 3629: 3623: 3617: 3613: 3599:my user page 3546: 3526: 3498: 3469: 3461: 3451:, plus your 3384: 3366: 3364: 3347: 3341: 3340: 3330: 3328: 3323: 3304: 3298: 3297: 3270:creation log 3237: 3225: 3196: 3190: 3164: 3162: 3157: 3141: 3126: 3124: 3119: 3112: 3088: 3072: 3070: 3065: 3056: 3048: 3044: 2951: 2949: 2944: 2933: 2922: 2914: 2913:To clarify, 2867: 2848: 2846: 2841: 2835: 2820: 2804: 2802: 2797: 2777: 2763: 2745: 2743: 2727: 2724: 2717: 2716: 2705: 2703: 2698: 2693: 2689: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2656: 2643: 2637: 2630: 2625: 2621: 2610: 2602: 2593: 2589: 2583: 2579: 2571: 2492: 2484: 2465: 2455: 2449: 2432: 2394: 2393:. There are 2386: 2382:(page 2948). 2376: 2367: 2356: 2347: 2314: 2303: 2299:one by one: 2295: 2289: 2288: 2261:creation log 2228: 2216: 2195: 2187: 2166:indefinitely 2164: 2159: 2115: 2100: 2098: 2093: 2074: 2045: 2044: 2029: 2027: 2022: 2019:, boldly.) 2014: 2013:some people 2009:legal threat 1981:legal threat 1969: 1967: 1962: 1940:disruptively 1934: 1902: 1900: 1895: 1889: 1885: 1868:WP:CONSENSUS 1856: 1854: 1849: 1821: 1819: 1814: 1785: 1774: 1772: 1767: 1740: 1738: 1733: 1727:edit warring 1695: 1693: 1688: 1660: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1627: 1619:disruptively 1599: 1580: 1578: 1573: 1546: 1544: 1539: 1516:welcome page 1500: 1457: 1455: 1450: 1423: 1421: 1416: 1385: 1383: 1378: 1344: 1342: 1337: 1313: 1295: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1272:disruptively 1252: 1227: 1225: 1220: 1205:Newimpartial 1193: 1191: 1186: 1180:Newimpartial 1159:Newimpartial 1139: 1118: 1116: 1111: 1078: 1076: 1071: 1061:WP:DEMOCRACY 1035: 1033: 1028: 1000: 984:edit warring 968: 953: 951: 946: 926: 909: 890: 884: 882: 880: 854: 852: 847: 843: 830: 777: 773: 772: 767: 765: 734: 731:User:Saff V. 726: 719: 684: 682: 677: 644:SharʿabSalam 631: 629: 624: 581: 579: 574: 546: 544: 539: 490: 488: 483: 469: 467: 462: 438: 433:I mean your 423: 421: 416: 403: 401: 396: 383: 381: 376: 322: 320: 315: 292: 269: 267: 262: 141: 126: 121: 117: 116: 95: 54: 52: 3485:Ian.thomson 3201:Ian.thomson 3045:does appear 3031:Ian.thomson 2919:McCarthyian 2901:Ian.thomson 2882:Black Islam 2870:McCarthyian 2636:and thinks 2078:Doug Weller 1886:majority of 1723:Binksternet 1708:Binksternet 1682:Binksternet 1668:Binksternet 1615:collaborate 1559:Doug Weller 1534:Doug Weller 1521:Doug Weller 1356:WP:DEADLINE 1268:collaborate 974:Hello, and 833:Doug Weller 439:refactoring 3946:filter log 3817:CaptainEek 3778:CaptainEek 3759:CaptainEek 3732:Ivanvector 3650:Discussion 3575:— Justice 3549:other RSs 3397:Ivanvector 3266:filter log 3183:, because 3091:WP:NOTTHEM 3043:That page 3026:repeatedly 2972:AmeriCorps 2884:, and the 2821:CaptainEek 2778:CaptainEek 2694:one by one 2257:filter log 2196:CaptainEek 2131:Ivanvector 1411:spaceships 801:uninvolved 506:documented 502:disruptive 480:material. 147:uninvolved 4039:read the 3965:checkuser 3924:block log 3440:WP:REHASH 3367:read the 3285:checkuser 3244:block log 3057:obligate' 2772:this edit 2746:read the 2584:TO MYSELF 2276:checkuser 2235:block log 2146:July 2020 1784:I agree, 1645:talk page 1621:, and to 1596:July 2020 1497:June 2020 1298:talk page 1274:, and to 996:talk page 992:consensus 965:June 2020 918:decision 903:, or the 897:sanctions 795:Broadly, 727:elections 609:User:El_C 568:User:El_C 534:User:El_C 504:, a well- 435:next edit 370:User:El_C 224:talk page 36:Adventure 3936:contribs 3618:paranoid 3531:WP:SORRY 3462:In short 3256:contribs 2984:Medicaid 2874:New Deal 2247:contribs 2186:|reason= 1651:or seek 1607:edit war 1375:though. 1304:or seek 1260:edit war 914:and the 883:It does 813:policies 784:COVID-19 766:It does 619:this RfC 222:On your 159:policies 4050:unblock 3959:unblock 3595:attacks 3527:hastily 3456:attacks 3436:WP:IDHT 3417:is you 3378:unblock 3279:unblock 2757:unblock 2270:unblock 2184:unblock 2161:blocked 1663:blocked 1661:may be 1316:blocked 1314:may be 994:on the 739:Pesqara 658:Saff V. 289:Warning 243:license 70:HostBot 3614:racist 3592:racist 3516:rule." 3453:racist 3447:about 3000:Also, 2982:, and 2939:newbie 2876:, the 2427:, etc. 2368:solely 1091:WP:3RR 825:blocks 807:, our 171:blocks 153:, our 4043:first 3681:edit 3402:Edits 3371:first 3195:) -- 3052:made. 2934:exact 2750:first 2611:lying 2136:Edits 1095:O3000 1065:WP:EW 1047:O3000 1011:O3000 823:, or 653:ANRFC 337:diffs 169:, or 4027:talk 3919:Ms96 3835:talk 3789:talk 3728:El_C 3616:and 3607:here 3547:Many 3489:talk 3438:and 3355:talk 3239:Ms96 3205:talk 3191:only 3138:this 3108:El_C 3095:El_C 3035:talk 2928:See 2905:talk 2815:Ms96 2734:talk 2662:and 2642:and 2631:(11) 2622:(10) 2565:and 2468:"On 2458:See 2433:NONE 2395:many 2230:Ms96 2173:. 2082:talk 2055:talk 2005:El_C 1997:El_C 1953:El_C 1944:El_C 1876:talk 1838:talk 1798:talk 1756:talk 1712:talk 1672:talk 1563:talk 1525:talk 1473:talk 1467:NP. 1439:talk 1401:talk 1363:talk 1325:talk 1209:talk 1163:talk 1148:talk 1099:talk 1051:talk 1015:talk 920:here 837:talk 821:bans 790:here 743:talk 667:El_C 601:El_C 597:COIN 558:El_C 526:El_C 514:El_C 452:El_C 443:El_C 362:El_C 349:El_C 304:El_C 295:El_C 251:talk 232:talk 228:Ms96 214:talk 200:talk 196:Ms96 184:talk 175:here 167:bans 137:here 74:talk 55:Ms91 3969:log 3916:). 3479:. 3425:. 3289:log 3236:). 3116:me. 3020:by 3012:or 2690:all 2603:(9) 2590:(8) 2580:ONE 2572:(7) 2493:(8) 2487:On 2485:(6) 2466:(5) 2456:(4) 2357:(3) 2348:(2) 2304:(1) 2280:log 2227:). 2192:. 2129:. 2049:.) 2046:bad 2015:can 1730:it. 935:PhD 932:mer 929:Sum 885:not 768:not 647:'s 593:ANI 245:.-- 122:not 53:Hi 24:The 4053:}} 4047:{{ 4029:) 4016:: 4003:会話 3996:MS 3981:: 3963:• 3957:• 3953:• 3948:• 3944:• 3939:• 3934:• 3930:• 3926:• 3875:会話 3868:MS 3855:会話 3848:MS 3837:) 3791:) 3746:会話 3739:MS 3730:, 3718:会話 3711:MS 3637:会話 3630:MS 3609:). 3579:, 3561:, 3558:, 3555:, 3552:, 3491:) 3464:: 3405:) 3399:(/ 3395:. 3381:}} 3375:{{ 3357:) 3344:: 3331:会話 3324:MS 3301:: 3283:• 3277:• 3273:• 3268:• 3264:• 3259:• 3254:• 3250:• 3246:• 3207:) 3199:. 3165:会話 3158:MS 3127:会話 3120:MS 3073:会話 3066:MS 3037:) 2978:, 2974:, 2952:会話 2945:MS 2907:) 2880:, 2849:会話 2842:MS 2836:my 2805:会話 2798:MS 2794:. 2760:}} 2754:{{ 2736:) 2720:: 2706:会話 2699:MS 2655:, 2450:is 2292:: 2274:• 2268:• 2264:• 2259:• 2255:• 2250:• 2245:• 2241:• 2237:• 2190:}} 2182:{{ 2139:) 2133:(/ 2101:会話 2094:MS 2057:) 2030:会話 2023:MS 2007:A 1995:. 1970:会話 1963:MS 1942:. 1903:会話 1896:MS 1878:) 1870:. 1857:会話 1850:MS 1840:) 1822:会話 1815:MS 1800:) 1775:会話 1768:MS 1758:) 1741:会話 1734:MS 1714:) 1696:会話 1689:MS 1674:) 1581:会話 1574:MS 1547:会話 1540:MS 1475:) 1458:会話 1451:MS 1441:) 1424:会話 1417:MS 1403:) 1386:会話 1379:MS 1365:) 1345:会話 1338:MS 1327:) 1228:会話 1221:MS 1211:) 1194:会話 1187:MS 1165:) 1150:) 1119:会話 1112:MS 1101:) 1079:会話 1072:MS 1053:) 1036:会話 1029:MS 1017:) 998:. 954:会話 947:MS 855:会話 848:MS 819:, 786:). 745:) 685:会話 678:MS 665:. 632:会話 625:MS 614:, 582:会話 575:MS 547:会話 540:MS 491:会話 484:MS 470:会話 463:MS 424:会話 417:MS 404:会話 397:MS 384:会話 377:MS 323:会話 316:MS 309:, 270:会話 263:MS 253:) 234:) 216:) 202:) 186:) 165:, 139:. 127:A 76:) 4025:( 3973:) 3971:) 3967:( 3922:( 3833:( 3822:⚓ 3810:: 3806:@ 3787:( 3780:: 3776:@ 3764:⚓ 3700:. 3686:0 3679:1 3590:" 3487:( 3353:( 3293:) 3291:) 3287:( 3242:( 3203:( 3113:0 3033:( 3006:) 3002:( 2903:( 2826:⚓ 2783:⚓ 2732:( 2648:? 2421:; 2415:; 2409:; 2403:; 2385:" 2339:. 2333:; 2327:; 2284:) 2282:) 2278:( 2233:( 2201:⚓ 2053:( 1874:( 1836:( 1796:( 1754:( 1710:( 1670:( 1471:( 1437:( 1399:( 1361:( 1323:( 1207:( 1161:( 1146:( 1097:( 1049:( 1013:( 792:. 741:( 735:I 249:( 230:( 212:( 198:( 182:( 72:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index