53:
other editors in the past couple of years on wikipedia. 3. The accusation of pedanticism is in line with the arguments you were making on talk:erfworld, which I've had no other user suggest to me in other disputes. I was naturally assuming that any user who'd log out to deface my user-page would use a proxy, so the geolocation of the IP didn't really factor into my conclusions. Just know that if you have any issues with my editing process, my talk page is uncensored with regard to claims against me, my user page is not.
38:
other interested editors, some of whom had much better ideas of available sources for the subject matter, in a public channel away from
Knowledge (XXG) was perhaps unwise, due to those who may overhear and do their own thing. Needless to say, I didn't SUGGEST it or any such lameness. You probably don't believe this, and the best evidence I can offer in favour is that my IP is located in the United Kingdom, not the US, which is admittedly weak. But I must attempt to set the story straight nevertheless.
81:
111:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
21:
I don't know why you thought there'd be any other user accusing me of that. "Anonymous" isn't a very good cover with clear context of a conversation. If you'd like to leave a message for me in the future, please use my talk page, not my user page. I honestly won't care what the content is. And
37:
Unfortunately, I must make such a claim, despite knowing what you're talking about. Although I have a fairly good guess as to who did it, I doubt they even have a
Knowledge (XXG) account. It was pointed out to me by the likely perpetrator afterwards. Suffice to say that discussing the matter with
52:
Well, fine, I wasn't going through any official channels, and if you insist it was not you, I'm going to accept that. I'll lay out the evidence that led me to believe that it was you and be gone: 1. IP address was active in the same time frame as you. 2. I have had no active disputes with any
108:
115:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
97:
101:
116:
93:
126:
58:
39:
31:
27:
121:
54:
23:
88:
72:
130:
62:
47:
22:
pretty-please don't insult my intelligence by claiming it wasn't you.
109:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Rob Balder (2nd nomination)
96:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
86:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
8:
98:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
7:
107:The discussion will take place at
16:
14:
79:
17:Please don't deface my userpage
1:
131:01:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
146:
94:significantly contributed
63:18:39, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
48:18:23, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
32:17:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
43:
117:the configuration page
92:, to which you have
100:or if it should be
137:
83:
82:
145:
144:
140:
139:
138:
136:
135:
134:
119:. Delivered by
84:
80:
77:
19:
12:
11:
5:
143:
141:
78:
76:
71:Nomination of
69:
68:
67:
66:
65:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
142:
133:
132:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
112:the article.
110:
105:
103:
99:
95:
91:
90:
74:
70:
64:
60:
56:
51:
50:
49:
45:
41:
40:Namegduf Live
36:
35:
34:
33:
29:
25:
120:
114:
106:
87:
85:
75:for deletion
20:
89:Rob_Balder
73:Rob_Balder
55:i kan reed
24:i kan reed
122:SDZeroBot
102:deleted
127:talk
59:talk
44:talk
28:talk
129:)
104:.
61:)
46:)
30:)
125:(
57:(
42:(
26:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.