624:
appears all over
Knowledge (XXG) in the stub categories. The issue has been briefly discussed at wikiproject: stub sorting and people seem to be tolerating its existance. However, I am more than happy for any user to blank the page if they find it distruptive, albiet most users would prefer to leave me a message instead of actually blanking the page and it now occurs to me that this may partially be because people are having trouble loading the page due to its sheer size. For this reason, I have taken the liberty of blanking the page myself. I do apologize if I have inconvenienced you or any other users on wikipedia with the use of this page. I will be using this page for further testing in future, however I will now blank it immediately after, if that's okay. Thank you for stopping by :) --
97:
search for a free copy if it's a journal, do all sorts of things before putting up the reference. In the meantime, someone has come by and trashed out an article I just started less than an hour ago with a tag that it needs references, which was what I came back to the article to do, add references after researching them. Would it really hurt anything to watch the article for 24 hours, to have reviewed my edit history and the other articles I have created, to add a single references yourself? Look at my talk page and see that the article creation was being discussed? Anything beside jump on it and say it's not referenced. If you can write and reference articles in no time flat, please start doing mine. But if you can't, have a little patience. --
116:. I find that often people will make new pages with little content and then not return to it. I have also found that pages that I have tagged have had their issues addressed by other wikipedians a few days down the track. I don't know, this might be a total coincidence, but I didn't see any harm in tagging these articles. Subsequent to the first message you left me, I have made a conscious effort to cut back on tagging new articles (except for obvious
551:
82:
other wikipedians see it, they may choose to add references themselves. This had nothing to do with my edit count and there is nothing stopping you from removing the tag once the article is referenced. Had you have used an under construction tag to begin with I probably would have left it alone. Once again I apologise for any distruption I may have caused you and I wish you good luck with your article --
161:
772:
120:: vandalism, spam and so on), and articles in general. I realise now that I should have investigated the matter more clearly before hastily placing a tag on the page. I apologise again and assure you that my actions were in good faith. I thank you for your comments, as they have been helpful to me in improving the way I approach edits and new articles. --
200:). One of its uses is stub tag generation. I'm not sure how someone can remember all the stub tags on wikipedia (there's hundreds!) - basically it presents all the stub categories in a tree, and you select the one you want and click copy. I did plan to present it to WikiProject Stub sorting when it's 'done' - but it has a fair way to go yet. --
564:, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please
802:
opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've
172:
about your stub-correcting programming (I only found out about it when I noticed your sandbox cropping up in stub categories across
Knowledge (XXG)!) It may well be something that will interest some of the editors over there, and they may also be able to point out some good or bad points to it which
81:
Hi there. Actually, I tagged the article because I thought it could do with some references; I didn't even see your message about not tagging it. I do apologise if you feel like I am being too hasty in tagging articles - I was only trying to highlight the fact that it needed references, so that when
96:
Can you just wait before tagging the articles? It takes time to do the necessary research to write science articles on
Knowledge (XXG). It also takes a lot of time to write the references. I have to make sure they are the latest and most correct reference, I have to find the ISBN if it's a book,
607:
Hi, another editor has drawn my attention to your sandbox 2, whic has a huge number of categories. It looks as if you are testing them, rather than using them, which I think is not allowed on user pages, but I had problems with FF3 simply opening the sandbox (unresponsive script message). Can you
623:
Hi there. The page is used for testing a C# application that I have been writing. I'm actually testing the generation of stub templates (which of course, add the page to its respective stub catagory), and since there are thousands of stub templates on
Knowledge (XXG), the page is quite large and
222:
useful - here are always problems loading the pages showing lists of stub types. As to remembering the lot, I don't think anyone could. What usually happens is that one editor roughly sorts a stub, then stub sorters who know that subject area sort it more finely. It takes two or three steps, but
65:
Actually, you reference it. I am so tired of freak-outs who tag an article I am in the middle of writing with every tag they can think of to up their edit counts. Oh, wait, I see your edit history, you did it just because I said don't. Oh, well, I used to make prank phone calls, no foul.
111:
Upon reflection, I admit that tagging the article with such lack of consideration was a bit thoughtless. Though I have been a reader for several years, I am a relatively new contributor to
Knowledge (XXG) and have been spending my time patrolling
504:
is going rather slow. I would like to get the templating done soon. To do that the merging needs to be completed first, or at least the proposed process finalized. I ask you to take part in getting this done. You can start by reading
355:
OK, I put you on the whitelist, so you should be OK going forward. Now, Huggle will give a "are you sure you want to revert a whitelisted user" warning before proceeding, so we should be able to avoid this happening again.
1050:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
995:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
809:
for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards,
325:
Sorry about that. You're absolutely right about the simultaneous edits. We need to get you on Huggle's whitelist - makes it easier to avoid mixups like this. I'll see if I can get you on it. --
509:
and then the talk page. I have already written two of the templates, but the rest will take a finalized process to write. Hopefully, you have the time to take part in this. Have a nice day! -
961:
to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
724:
ACC creation as done and i didnt see you in active in last 5 min list, therefore I marked that request as done as someone else also may try to create again. Hope you wont mind --
496:...Since you agreed that the sock puppet process needed an overhaul, I was wondering if you would be somewhat active in making sure that it gets done. Currently, the merging of
956:
561:
44:
for the other properties of that company. It wasn't a mistake, I'm just new to
Knowledge (XXG)'s editor still, and was a bit slow in doing the edits. Thanks!
248:
Looks useful, no time to look into it now, but have just edited your sandbox2 page to make the 2 occurrences of plain stub tag into tl, so that it keeps out of
303:- you might like to add more info. BTW, I didn't blank that test page,m but if you could remove it once you've finished all your tests it would be useful :)
785:
413:
I'm not sure where you want the bug reports to go, so I'll just use the talk page for now. Under the current version: Click the tab for stub tags --: -->
300:
169:
117:
1075:
1020:
501:
497:
666:
1071:
1016:
952:
867:
191:
Hi there, Grutness! I appreciate you interest in my project - feel free to blank my sandbox pages if they get in your way :)
40:. The original page was full of information about the specific GBC game, so I split it off to it's own page, similar to
1062:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1007:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
18:
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
1067:
1012:
900:)? Though you could start running out of tabs and need to use a selectbox instead... Including cleanup templates like
514:
746:
I know, I just saw that on IRC - I don't mind at all. Feel free to join us :) #wikipedia-en-accounts at freenode --
528:
Just thought we'd discuss the edit which I made to the above article, which you reverted back. At the beginning of
423:
532:, a carton of bleach is seen spilling over, and flows in front of the Miniature Killer. Is this not relevant? -
529:
278:
Not a problem, you can blank the page if it gets in your way, I only use it to look for typos in my stub tags. --
863:
395:
924:
848:
843:
for details of when this flag may be withdrawn.) If you need it again and are going to use it, let me know.
804:
196:
The program has various uses - primarily it's for making citations (it's based loosely on source code from
1063:
1008:
894:
732:
197:
948:
522:
1039:
1030:
984:
975:
45:
934:
884:
721:
714:
694:
644:
613:
135:
98:
67:
49:
1059:
1043:
1004:
988:
914:
874:
817:
461:
309:
229:
179:
139:
102:
71:
33:
1055:
1047:
1000:
992:
506:
725:
582:
565:
510:
113:
41:
1058:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1051:
1003:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
996:
840:
904:
931:
686:
640:
609:
533:
361:
330:
257:
249:
812:
747:
625:
472:
457:
437:
371:
341:
304:
279:
224:
201:
174:
121:
83:
59:
930:, in similar fashion to the stub tree, with descriptions of use would be awesome...
550:
160:
844:
571:
37:
839:
I've cancelled your accountcreator flag as you don't seem to be using it. (See
962:
771:
680:
44 accounts created in two days? You're a monster! Enjoy this well-deserved
357:
326:
253:
456:
I cannot use more than 4 characters in author's name for a book reference.
665:
608:
kill the links on those you've tested by removing one of the brackets?
1046:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge (XXG)
991:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge (XXG)
32:
Hi Nacimota! I saw that you just redirected a newpage generation from
1079:
1024:
969:
937:
852:
824:
756:
740:
701:
648:
634:
617:
589:
481:
465:
445:
430:
380:
365:
350:
334:
315:
287:
261:
235:
209:
185:
143:
129:
106:
91:
75:
53:
159:
560:
I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at
168:
Hi Nacimota - you might like to post some kind of note at
1038:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
983:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
544:
299:Hi again - mention has been made of this now on
471:Just fixed in 0.7.1 - thanks for the report! --
223:no-one goes mad trying to remember them all :)
301:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Stub sorting
170:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Stub sorting
8:
663:
416:literature. Under this there is a typo (
389:
862:Just wondering what your plans are for
558:Thank you for participating in my RfB!
252:which is on the verge of being empty!
947:A file that you uploaded or altered,
866:? Will you be implementing the other
7:
943:File:Iacia09.jpg listed for deletion
953:Knowledge (XXG):Files for deletion
639:OK, thanks, I'll pass on message,
14:
1064:review the candidates' statements
1009:review the candidates' statements
770:
664:
549:
321:Sorry about the rollback/warning
173:might not have occurred to you.
890:(which are more important than
766:
415:language and literature --: -->
1070:. For the Election committee,
1040:Arbitration Committee election
1031:ArbCom elections are now open!
1015:. For the Election committee,
985:Arbitration Committee election
976:ArbCom elections are now open!
970:12:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
1080:13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1025:13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
674:The Account Creation Barnstar
657:The Account Creation Barnstar
684:and keep up the good work! –
536:@ 23:31, 29 July 2008 (GMT)
218:That looks like it might be
1066:and submit your choices on
1011:and submit your choices on
853:16:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
1095:
1072:MediaWiki message delivery
1017:MediaWiki message delivery
835:Account creator permission
825:22:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
757:11:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
741:11:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
858:Wikicite+ future features
702:17:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
682:account creation barnstar
670:
649:08:02, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
635:07:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
618:05:49, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
590:08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
547:
516:05:46, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
482:18:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
466:13:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
381:07:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
366:07:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
351:07:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
335:07:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
316:03:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
144:23:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
130:21:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
107:21:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
92:14:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
76:07:06, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
54:19:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
938:01:55, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
784:...for participating in
452:Author in book reference
446:07:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
431:23:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
288:14:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
283:
262:13:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
236:01:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
210:01:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
205:
198:Knowledge (XXG):Wikicite
186:01:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
125:
87:
418:Fictional locatio stubs
515:_SSP2_going_slow": -->
502:Requests for checkuser
498:Suspected sock puppets
165:
1044:Arbitration Committee
989:Arbitration Committee
951:, has been listed at
436:Fixed in 0.6.73 ;) --
163:
790:, which closed with
523:The Miniature Killer
488:SSP & RFCU : -->
28:Magi Nation redirect
1048:arbitration process
993:arbitration process
720:You forget to mark
399:Issues and Feedback
340:Not a problem ;) --
1060:arbitration policy
1005:arbitration policy
868:citation templates
540:RfB Thank You spam
166:
164:Wikicite+ beta 0.3
955:. Please see the
832:
831:
707:
706:
599:
598:
568:. Again, Thanks!
429:
406:
405:
312:
232:
182:
34:Magi Nation (GBC)
1086:
967:
949:File:Iacia09.jpg
929:
923:
919:
913:
909:
903:
899:
893:
889:
883:
879:
873:
827:
820:
815:
807:
788:
781:
774:
767:
752:
700:
697:
691:
668:
661:
660:
630:
588:
585:
579:
553:
545:
477:
426:
421:
390:
376:
346:
310:
230:
180:
42:Magi-Nation Duel
1094:
1093:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1068:the voting page
1034:
1013:the voting page
979:
963:
945:
927:
921:
917:
911:
907:
901:
897:
891:
887:
881:
877:
871:
860:
837:
818:
813:
805:
786:
783:
777:
765:
750:
718:
695:
687:
685:
659:
628:
605:
600:
583:
572:
569:
542:
526:
491:
489:SSP2 going slow
475:
454:
428:
424:
414:culture --: -->
411:
402:
374:
344:
323:
158:
63:
30:
21:
12:
11:
5:
1092:
1090:
1037:
1033:
1028:
982:
978:
973:
944:
941:
925:cleanup-school
859:
856:
836:
833:
830:
829:
775:
764:
761:
760:
759:
736:
729:
717:
711:
709:
705:
704:
677:
676:
671:
669:
658:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
604:
601:
597:
596:
593:
592:
555:
543:
541:
538:
534:User:TAndRDInS
525:
521:Sara Sidle in
519:
490:
486:
485:
484:
453:
450:
449:
448:
422:
410:
407:
404:
403:
401:
393:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
383:
322:
319:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
250:Category:Stubs
241:
240:
239:
238:
213:
212:
193:
192:
157:
154:
153:
152:
151:
150:
149:
148:
147:
146:
62:
57:
29:
26:
23:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1091:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
986:
977:
974:
972:
971:
968:
966:
960:
959:
954:
950:
942:
940:
939:
936:
933:
926:
916:
906:
896:
886:
876:
869:
865:
857:
855:
854:
850:
846:
842:
834:
828:
826:
823:
822:
821:
816:
808:
801:
797:
793:
789:
780:
776:
773:
769:
768:
762:
758:
755:
754:
753:
745:
744:
743:
742:
738:
737:
734:
731:
730:
727:
723:
722:User:Satvarsh
716:
715:User:Satvarsh
712:
710:
703:
698:
692:
690:
683:
679:
678:
675:
672:
667:
662:
656:
650:
646:
642:
638:
637:
636:
633:
632:
631:
622:
621:
620:
619:
615:
611:
602:
595:
594:
591:
586:
580:
578:
576:
567:
563:
559:
556:
554:
552:
546:
539:
537:
535:
531:
524:
520:
518:
517:
512:
508:
503:
499:
495:
494:Dear Nacimota
487:
483:
480:
479:
478:
470:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
434:
433:
432:
427:
419:
408:
400:
397:
394:
392:
391:
382:
379:
378:
377:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
354:
353:
352:
349:
348:
347:
339:
338:
337:
336:
332:
328:
320:
318:
317:
314:
313:
306:
302:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
237:
234:
233:
226:
221:
217:
216:
215:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
194:
190:
189:
188:
187:
184:
183:
176:
171:
162:
155:
145:
141:
137:
133:
132:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
110:
109:
108:
104:
100:
95:
94:
93:
89:
85:
80:
79:
78:
77:
73:
69:
61:
60:Cushion plant
58:
56:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
27:
25:
20:
19:
1035:
980:
964:
957:
946:
895:cite episode
861:
838:
811:
810:
799:
798:neutral and
795:
794:in support,
791:
782:
779:Thank you...
778:
763:Many thanks!
749:
748:
733:
726:
719:
708:
688:
681:
673:
627:
626:
606:
574:
573:
557:
548:
527:
493:
492:
474:
473:
455:
441:
417:
412:
398:
373:
372:
370:Thanks :) --
343:
342:
324:
308:
298:
228:
219:
178:
167:
64:
31:
22:
17:
16:
932:··gracefool
566:let me know
530:Living Doll
38:Magi Nation
1056:topic bans
1001:topic bans
958:discussion
885:cite paper
603:Categories
1052:site bans
997:site bans
915:technical
875:cite news
864:Wikicite+
641:jimfbleak
610:jimfbleak
420:). ^_^ —
409:Stub Typo
396:Wikicite+
134:Cool. --
114:new pages
46:Romzombie
24:DISCUSS.
870:such as
751:Nacimota
735:Cherian
629:Nacimota
476:Nacimota
458:Mercator
438:Nacimota
375:Nacimota
345:Nacimota
305:Grutness
280:Nacimota
225:Grutness
202:Nacimota
175:Grutness
136:Blechnic
122:Nacimota
99:Blechnic
84:Nacimota
68:Blechnic
806:a space
803:set up
1042:. The
987:. The
905:wikify
845:Stifle
841:WP:RPE
787:my RfA
713:AC of
562:my RfB
425:Maggot
965:Kelly
577:levse
156:Stubs
1076:talk
1021:talk
920:and
880:and
849:talk
819:moff
814:Gazi
728:Tinu
696:talk
689:xeno
645:talk
614:talk
584:Talk
507:SSP2
500:and
462:talk
442:talk
362:talk
358:JaGa
331:talk
327:JaGa
311:wha?
284:talk
258:talk
254:PamD
231:wha?
220:very
206:talk
181:wha?
140:talk
126:talk
103:talk
88:talk
72:talk
50:talk
1036:Hi,
981:Hi,
792:119
307:...
227:...
177:...
118:CSD
36:to
1078:)
1054:,
1023:)
999:,
928:}}
922:{{
918:}}
912:{{
910:,
908:}}
902:{{
898:}}
892:{{
888:}}
882:{{
878:}}
872:{{
851:)
739:-
647:)
616:)
587:•
581:•
570:—
513:@
511:LA
464:)
444:)
364:)
356:--
333:)
286:)
260:)
208:)
142:)
128:)
105:)
90:)
74:)
66:--
52:)
1074:(
1019:(
935:☺
847:(
800:5
796:4
699:)
693:(
643:(
612:(
575:R
460:(
440:(
360:(
329:(
282:(
256:(
204:(
138:(
124:(
101:(
86:(
70:(
48:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
