User talk:Nat/Archives 4

922:

like your/nats remembrance if received it myself. I think i would like it:) I can easily understand Lama's feelings (though they are illogical a bit), and easily understand feelings of other people who say thanks. But the whole thing seems good. Somebody is disturbed, more are touched, but nobody offended to the extent making this bad. Just with any thing that touches too many people. I dont like many buildings in my city of Moscow, and many other things... If everybody did the same, anout every holiday... that surely would be bad:) When one man does this (even every RD) - it's seems good:) So I'm touched. It's strange thing - those remembrance days... As I see - it serves good feelings and purposes in Canada. Dont know why. I'm happy to know this! I'm not happy with the memory of WWII (we do not remember WWI since to many things happened since that time...) here in Russia. I wish the veterans to forget it... they couldnt. I wish my country to help them to forget and return to life. I wish myself to forget anything that bad. I wish patriotes stopped celebrate that war every time they feel... it's time to celebrate a war. I wish i didn play with some toys at the childhood, didnt saw many-many soviet movies with russian killing germans and vice versa. Didnt imagine myself doing this.

2188:

nobody objects within a certain period of time, the right to object runs out. There is a clear lack of consensus for a move. Thus, the move should not be carried out, whether or not technical procedures have been carried out to the letter. Is a 5-3 vote (with one additional user having previously expressed himself on the "3" side)? Does the fact that Tharkun and I did not object until after the artificial 5 day period was up (but before the move was actually carried out) make our objections irrelevant? Does it really make sense to move an article when there are clearly strong objections to a move? Procedures should not be raised above the goals which they are supposed to promote. The reason we have RM procedures is to insure that moves don't carried out unless there's a consensus for them. If there's clearly not a consensus, as there isn't in this case, it doesn't matter if the RM procedures have been carefully observed or not - the page doesn't move.

441:

in them, who live through them, and who suffered because of them....I am trying to be as ambiguous as possible with this notices, which means that anyone could see it differently...some people might see it as a reminder of how Canada "became" a nation in WWI, or of how many people died in Hiroshima or Nagasaki, or of the attack at Pearl Harbor, or of the Holocaust, or of the killings in Darfur, or of the Rwandan Genocide, or of the Nanking Massacre....its up to those who receive the message to define what it is a reminder of...I would say the about 90%+ of the people, I left these notices on, worked on some of the same articles or or same project, or even an arbcomm case that I have been involved with...I feel that I'm not pushing any POV, just a reminder, to remember those who lived and died in any wars or conflicts...

1434:

understand (who canvassed whom, where, and when?) At any rate, I appreciate the time you took to look at this matter, even if the outcome was not what I was hoping for, based on the overwhelming evidence that the categories are useful and that the decision to delete them was flawed, in that it did not reflect the consensus, especially that of editors who actually spend most of their time here at WP to add content to wikipedia, and may not be as well versed in the refined art of struggling in AFD/CFD/DRVs.

1250:

information, now it is all completely lost. If it's not too much to ask, it's ok if it gets deleted in the end, but I want to BEG for you to restore my user page just while I save all of my lost information on my personal computer, it means a lot to us and I really want to recover the data. We worked HARD on getting the page together! Once again, I apologize for the inconvenience and for editing this page, I just want to save all of my lost information.--

31: 2035:. The trust bestowed upon me by the community is one of the most touching honours that I have ever received, and I vow not to let you down. Whether you have suggestions for ways in which I could improve, a request for assistance or just need someone to listen, my talk page and my email are always open. I pledge to do what I can to help this project, in the words of 909:

previous contact with you. I can only assume that if you have sent me a message then you must have sent a LOT of people a message to the same effect. Can you imagine how full of event-span our userpages would be if everyone spammed each other for holidays, causes, events that they thought were especially important? That's what facebook is for :-P Thanks,

508: 860: 1200: 409:

article editing, it could lead to proliferation. What if I were to post "Remember Pearl Harbor" on everyone's page a few weeks from now? That might not sit too well with our Japanese audience, as most of them would have had nothing to do with the Pearl Harbor attacks. Especially if I attach a photo of the

1022:

Everyone is thanking you for that, so I will do the same. As a proud Canadian soldier and a history major, it's very special to me to see that people, regardless of affiliation to the military, appreciate military history and support the Canadian military (an assumption I hope is accurate). Keep it

817:

Thanks for the reminder Nat. My hat goes off to all of our friends up North and throughout the Commonwealth. Also, a very belated congratulations on your successful RfA. Had I not been in the middle of a very long downtime I would have voted for you. But I'm glad to see that your good work speaks for

921:

The girl I love, she is a girl. But what the would be our beloved world looking like if all the humankind consisted of girls!? Nevertheless I thank our God for she being a girl (not a boy, asexual being, plant, whatever):) Sorry, i'm mathematician a little:) Nat, lama, i don't know whether i would

2172:

I guess I have no choice but to obey. It's clear that there was no consensus. Following bureaucratic procedures is less important than indicating the real situation, which is that there's a lack of consensus. In some cases, it would be inappropriate to change - for instance, an attempt to change

996:

Hi Nat, since I see that you are pretty active on WP I want to ask if I can ask you to block clear vandals when I notice them, or what is actually the best procedure to have vandal accounts and IP banned? Personally I think that we shouldn't allow anon IP to edit WP but since it's not up to me I am

440:

They were all done by hand...never in my life will I use the AWB because firstly, I don't know how to use it, and secondly, I have no need for it...the point of these Remembrance Day notices is to remind people about the wars (doens't really matter which one or which side) and the people who fought

2187:

Ah, just saw G2 and GoodDay's comments above. This seems to revolve around a misunderstanding of wikipedia procedures on their part which is considerably more serious than my technical violation of the conclusion of the supposed vote. The situation is not a "run out the clock" situation where if

1477:

Nat, I'm a bit confused. Unfortunately, much (most?) of the material about my campaigning (the reason given for overturning ...yourself?) is at my talk page, so I can appreciate the context problem. But, am I right that you are the admin who closed the Deletion Review, in favor of overturning the

1363:

notices, people so not need reminding that its rememberance day (or be forced to be reminded). Yes, many soldiers gave their lives for what we have today, and everyone is eternally grateful for that. Although, yes it is a nice gesture, you have spammed several users talk pages with this, so please

385:

Please, do we really need to pick apart something exceedingly well-meaning just because it doesn't have to do with the encyclopedia? At the very least, it educated me (and maybe some others) about a US holiday that is shared with numerous other countries. I'd say it's at least done a little bit of

336:

are complaining, since it doesn't seem he even left it on your page. Judging by the reaction on his talk page, people don't seem to mind - in fact they seem to appreciate the reminder. When the "slogan" is "Lest we forget", people tend to appreciate reminders and acknowledge them as necessary. Of

1905:

Hi, this user is still breaking 3RR on several other articles, even after your recent warning and protection of one page, and warnings by other users to stop, he's broken 3RR on several pages in a matter of hours, and he's removing tons of sourced texts from pages like this which is vandalasim.

908:

Please don't spam my userpage with reminders for holidays that you think are important. I appreciate that it is indeed an important event to be remembered, but there is no need to tell me that on my userpage since I have no relationship to the wikiprojects or people related to it, nor have I had

422:

My goal was just to discuss the issue, which a lot of people have personal attachment to because of members of their family who served in the wars. As BB points out, it could be construed as spam. It also was not clear whether the edits were made by hand of via a script; I was hoping to find out

408:

This is a touchy area. It depends on how his target audience was chosen. If it's users he has worked with before, that's one thing. If it's indiscriminate, it would almost certainly be a spamming violation, which is discouraged for fairly obvious reasons. Aside from only vaguely being related to

1884:

For the record, your block wasn't what made me leave (though obviously I didn't like it). You are a good admin, couldn't have been easy to block another admin. You did the right thing. Stick to your guns on things like this. I might/might not have done the same thing. Figured you should know. -

925:

That's good when ppl remember people, not their death. Sometimes - even when the death. That is no good when we remeber war and victory (and when the memory slowly becomes the celebration). As well as no good when we remember _our_ sufferings instead of living happy lives. There are things to

1433:

categories, a deletion that does not reflect at all consensus, in my humble opinion—and that of the vast majority of those editors who commented on this subject, on countless pages throughout WP. Now, unfortunately, I see you reversed your decision, for reasons of "canvassing", which I don't

1249:

I am extremely sorry to edit this page, but I was completely shocked to find all my information deleted. I was unaware of the rules and I apologize for it. The information I had saved on my user page is made by family and friends, it's our own countdown and it took us 4 years to get all that

1325:

Hey Nat, I hope it isn't a bother, but I was just curious as to how you get those fancy Knowledge signatures. I've seen the box in my preferences, but I'm not quite sure what to put in there to actually change things such as the colour or font. Thanks for welcoming me and being so friendly!

926:

forget. I do remember englishmen, germans... other ppl who died somewhere in Belgium during the 1st worldwar. I did read Kipling poems on this as a child... i was touched. I remember other things that i dont want to mention. But i wish to forget many other things. Else my soul becomes ill.

1730:

I changed it so that instead of first terms being bolded, second and successive terms are italicized. The bolding was really just visually jarring and unattractive, and the link to the current article is bolded anyways, which would be confusing in some situations (e.g. both instances of

2371:

Nat, can you please take a look at that page, I think a guy misbehaves and crossed the line with POV pushing and calling people names, I'm only remotely involved, I'm not a main editor of that page, I followed it only because I've done some small edit or reverted a vandal. Thanks. --

1376:

Please note, the above is not meant to sound nasty/rude, I just feel its inappropriate to go round several user talk pages of users who some of which you have had no previous interactions with, and spam them with lest we forget notice, although like I said — it is a nice gesture.

1858:

a day prior which goes into some unfortunate behavior. It was obvious to me that he was on the edge and likely burnt out (or that his user account was compromised). I was hoping that he would take a break from editing and come back when refreshed. Unfortunately, he didn't. --

2060:

Thanks for taking the time to comment on my RfA. I understand you did not feel quite up to supporting me, but that's a Good Thing(tm). If you tell me what was in my responses to your questions that worried you, I'll be especially careful around where you feel I'm weaker.

2124:

on organizing and appropriately moving the articles on the Commownealth realms' monarchies. The result was to have them all the same, and titled in the common "Monarchy of " format. There was some dissent, however, the result seems clear after the 5 days required by

2173:

from "no consensus" to one of the options would clearly be inappropriate. But that's not because of some bureaucratic rules. That's because it's worse to claim a consensus when there is not one than to acknowledge what is clearly a case of a lack of consensus.

359:

I noticed the messages in my watchlist. Although armistice day is certainly a noble cause, it isn't clear that leaving numerous talk page messages about it is really appropriate. There are lots of similar causes that other users would care about equally. — Carl

1301:

Thanks for the note - I had the exact same request posted on my User page - and I've sorted it for him - nothing to worry about and therefore nothing for you to do - just didn't want you trying to action something that'd already been done - have a good one.

1147:

I believe that in Canada, the poppy is usually worn for the two weeks prior to Remembrance Day itself, which is on 11 November. So, I'd think that to follow the spirit of the commemoration, you'd want to have the poppy up till 12 November. You can also see

452:

Your dedication is impressive, spending hours and hours just substituting the same message by hand. I do think the message pretty neutral in terms of POV. It just seemed unusual to have a holiday announcement, Every day is a holiday somewhere... — Carl

1604:

you found not quite right in my responses, if you don't mind telling me? It's possible we just don't see eye to eye on some aspects of wielding the mop, but your perspective might show me what you felt was important and I might, in fact, agree. :-)

2136:

to "Monarchy of the United Kingdom." Two of us involved in the discussion don't feel our moving the page will be accepted by this user, and will result in a revert war. Thus, could you, as an uninvolved admin, please perform this move for us? Cheers.

423:

through conversation. The long period during which the edits were made, with no other edits made at all, suggested automated editing. I would appreciate hearing from Nat about it, but I didn't think it warranted even a warning, just a note. — Carl

1804: 689: 2456:

had a problem with it as he reverted your edit - he complained about "trad vs. simp" -traditional vs. simple chinese characters I suppose? In regards to getting consensus in the talk page before editing - Knowledge as a bureocracy feels

2424:. Although your input is welcome and appreciated should you choose to give it, the case will proceed without your acceptance if you choose not to participate at all (which occurs occasionally with outside commenters in RfM's). Thanks, 1533: 1077:

The above arbitration case has closed. "For showing consistently poor judgment in performing administrative actions", Alkivar is desysopped. He may apply to the committee to have his adminship reinstated, but may not apply at

1960:. The image RX-178S.W.gif is used multiple times, among other things, and it currently looks like a mess. Would it be impertinent of me to request a revert to the previous version that has been agreed upon by consensus? 166:

I just noticed the Remembrance Day reminder that you so kindly left on another user's talk page. I hope you don't mind if I "borrow" it for my page too. I'll be at the cenotaph on Sunday, reciting those words....

1579:. I think the article should be unprotected, since there was no major edit war in progress when you protected the article, and the level of vandalism was not so significant that it warranted semi-protection. 1752:

If you accidentally delete something and restore it, please check the log or the page itself, to see if it was protected before deletion. If it was protected before, do re-protect it. This is especially for

1447:

Nat - you cited canvassing as your reason for reversing your original "deletion overturned" close. The part I don't understand is how come you only seemed to realise that there were concerns over canvassing

2400: 732:), the sacrifices made by our soldiers (British and Canadian alike) to protect our freedom is something that means a lot to me. It's good to see someone making an effort to ensure that we all remember. 2460:

What do I think? I think it is much better than the one that was there before in the China page -Obviously in the right direction and I think it is rather nice in general. I think it's very good work.

1553:

I'm sure you meant well, but closing the Erdos number DRV early was not the best choice, especially since you had to reverse yourself. Five days is good minimum for a DRV, and only in the face of an

1460:. Didn't you take them into account when making your original close decision ? If not, why not ?? Some sort of explanation would be helpful for those like me who are rather confused by what you did. 65: 1456:. Was SparsityProblem's complaint alone enough to persuade you to reverse your original close ? The canvassing concerns were discussed right at the top of DRV discussion and had also been raised on 530:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!

1928:

Please forgive me if I come off like one of those "wrong version" whiners - while I appreciate you stepping in with regards to the ongoing edit war, it looks like it's been protected mid-edit by

1830:

Do you think you can make this image 468 by 60, as per the banner guidelines? And, the correct format Image:Qxz-adX.gif, where X is # of image. That's probably why the banner is not showing up.

2266:

article seems fine as it is. I disagree that Itub was engaging in 3RR because I find the reverts to be justifiable in that we should never cite ourselves as a reference, such as in here:

1408:

Hi, I'm not all that familiar with DRV, so this may be a silly question, but I see that you closed the Erdos number category DRV even though it's only been listed since November 7, and

1814: 1453: 1416: 1633:

Thanks for taking charge in that issue, it started to feel bad to be taunted on my page that it doesn't matter if I protest to racist remarks and that nobody cares... --

1817: 1478:

deletion, and then overturned yourself? And your testimony is that you were not the subject of campaigning yourself, by anyone, correct? I'll watch this page. Thanks,

930:

sorry for such a long comment. I just glad to see thar you folks feeling such things by such way. May be... not all of you... not to all extent... but generally:)--

757: 2399:

that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at

2347:

Just read a bit more through your user page, well if you need help with translating something not very long in Romanian, I will gladly help you :) Kind Regards, --

2024: 703:

For taking the time to remind those you've known that we should never forget - lest we do the same mistakes again, in as apolitical a message as possible. Thanks!

1498: 1207: 1099:

Thank you for the Remembrance Day tribute/reminder. Remembrance Day is a holiday all too often forgotten, and it's nice to see someone who cares. Cheers,

2121: 2000: 1070: 1811: 1654: 947:

Why have you protected this? The additions by Wormwood66 do not call for article protection but for the blocking of the user for disruptive edits.

809: 2407:. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, 2222:) 20:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC) p.s.: You have probably saved me from much embarrassment of reverting and possibly being blocked. Thank you. -- 1131: 1953: 1219: 257:

I noticed you have put the reminder on a lot of user talk pages. I haven't seen this sort of announcement of a holiday done before. — Carl

1886: 1808: 1766: 980: 1735:

being bolded in its article). Plus, since multiple instances are the exception, not the rule, it makes more sense to emphasize them.

1703: 1051: 2214:. I believe there is a discussion which will need to happen concerning this articles content. It is in need of some referencing. -- 2392: 1689: 1079: 1055: 957: 555: 745: 1783: 1776: 1706:). There's still some discussion going on, but I think it'll be handled in a much more appropriate way from now on. Thanks! 1059: 2403:, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Knowledge, please refer to 1873: 1178: 1171:

yea, thanks for the message. Its great that you are doing this because remembrance day is ironically to often forgotten. -- (

316: 187: 2396: 518: 492: 1939: 1518: 320: 191: 133:

Thank you for that Remembrance Day reminder. That reminds me, thank you for stopping us before we get started again.

1126: 579: 38: 1452:

your made your first "deletion overturned" decision, when SparsityProblem raised the concerns in his complaint on

1409: 2490: 2468: 2352: 2338: 2323: 1947: 1762: 1136: 559: 515: 489: 115: 83: 82:

Much as I'd like to see the page kept, if you offer no reply in 12 hours I will put the page up on MfD again.

615: 2293: 2095: 1890: 1139: 754: 721: 1121: 1114: 1831: 1758: 1697: 1514: 1345: 1331: 1047: 2103: 760: 2278: 2193: 2178: 2008: 1510: 1234: 1101: 931: 597: 351: 299: 283: 212: 147:

I really like your Remembrance Day reminder. I hope you don't mind if I put it on my own page. Cheers

2260: 1942:). The current version uses the infobox favored by consensus, but the templates and page layout that 1851: 1754: 1713: 1683: 1420: 1159: 913: 837: 832: 154: 2099: 1999: 2486: 2464: 2404: 2373: 2348: 2334: 2319: 2301: 2270: 2142: 1980: 1965: 1943: 1803:

As you apparently favour the keeping of this page, you may wish to comment in the second MfD here:

1644: 1634: 1585: 1537: 1412:

says that pages should remain on deletion review for at least five days. Can you explain? Thanks.

1270: 1261: 1251: 1008: 998: 583: 2377: 2242: 2227: 2219: 2080: 2044: 2012: 1867: 1086: 742: 671: 662: 645: 527: 414: 313: 242: 227: 184: 1678:? The dispute about names is more-or-less resolved, since the troublesome editor in question, 724:(and I had a grandfather who fought in North Africa during WWII and an uncle who served in the 95:

Riana already grilled me on IRC about it, so my response is if you wish to reopen it go ahead.

2515: 2500: 2482: 2157: 1693: 1341: 1327: 1310: 1290: 1042: 941: 890: 774: 2507: 1082:. Burntsauce is banned as a meat-puppet of banned user JB196. For the Arbitration Committee, 305:

Because Remembrance Day is to honor the sacrifices of those in World War I and World War II.

2274: 2189: 2174: 2133: 1933: 1620: 1502: 1479: 1227: 870: 396: 276: 205: 2453: 2365: 2040: 1914: 1709: 1679: 1215: 1155: 1149: 1120:? Just asking. No offense or anything, I don't really know much about remembrance day... - 1117: 910: 806: 794: 784: 733: 392: 150: 134: 1430: 1214:

which means that I did not succeed. As many expressed their appreciation of my works in

707: 2297: 2138: 1976: 1961: 1732: 1581: 1576: 1572: 1461: 1435: 1395: 1025: 533: 342: 793:

I spotted this and put it on my own user talk page. Thanks for designing that notice.

2238: 2223: 2215: 2077: 1957: 1860: 1457: 1172: 1083: 729: 704: 654: 485: 460: 430: 367: 310: 264: 238: 223: 181: 69: 47: 17: 2318:

Uite si un haiduc in Canada? cu multe contributii pe WP :). Bravo :) Numai bine, --

1238: 413:

billowing smoke, next to a photo of the mushroom clouds over Hiroshima or Nagasaki.

2511: 2478: 2153: 2126: 1835: 1736: 1303: 1283: 1260:

Please? All I want to do is save all the info I had up in my userpage, that's it.--

1223: 884: 874: 819: 628: 619: 605: 1805:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Images of Wikipedians (2nd nomination)

2132:

However, one editor is particularly obstinate in his opposition to the moving of

543:

Ooops - just realised it's on 11 Nov everywhere - must have been an early note :P

2426: 2409: 2211: 2204: 2036: 1929: 1795: 1222:

to maintain the standards of featured contents in addition to my active role in

961: 948: 658: 168: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1660:

Hello, can you take over about this disagreement. We have conflicting sources.

2519: 2493: 2471: 2432: 2415: 2381: 2356: 2342: 2327: 2305: 2282: 2246: 2231: 2197: 2182: 2161: 2146: 2107: 2083: 2065: 2062: 2047: 1984: 1969: 1918: 1910: 1894: 1878: 1840: 1820: 1798: 1770: 1739: 1720: 1647: 1637: 1623: 1609: 1606: 1590: 1561: 1558: 1540: 1522: 1482: 1464: 1438: 1423: 1398: 1383: 1370: 1348: 1334: 1312: 1292: 1273: 1264: 1254: 1183: 1166: 1142: 1107: 1089: 1064: 1031: 1011: 1001: 983: 964: 951: 934: 916: 895: 844: 822: 797: 787: 777: 736: 674: 670:

OK. I'm not offended, just confused. But then, that's my normal state. :)

665: 648: 631: 622: 608: 586: 574: 562: 501: 465: 447: 435: 417: 403: 387: 372: 354: 345: 327: 287: 269: 246: 231: 216: 198: 171: 161: 137: 118: 101: 86: 76: 2253: 2016: 854: 350:

I was just curious because I fail to see how it's relevant to Knowledge. --

1534:

Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/2007_Romanian_Air_Force_IAR-330_SOCAT_crash

688: 1226:. And don't worry, I'm still supporting Wikimania 2009. Have a great day. 1854:

for "Votesacking....Violation of WP:CANVASS...please stop". I had posted

1378: 1365: 976: 456: 442: 426: 363: 298:

Why are you spamming Remberance Day templates on people's talk pages? --

260: 96: 2333:

In case you don't speak Romanian, my apologies, and still welcome! :) --

2263: 1199: 1041:

Can you give some context to the message you left on my talk page.--

204:

Nat, that's so nice of you. You always go a mile ahead of everyone!

1429:

Salut, Nat. I was happy to see you overturned the deletion of the

997:

looking for an efficient way to deal with this problem. Thanks. --

1675: 1667: 507: 2401:

Knowledge:Requests for mediation/Premier of the Republic of China

2011:

was voted by the community to serve a land that he loved. Today,

1218:

during my RfA, I will fill up the vacuum position of director in

488:

day today. We remember on Nov 11 - but thanks for the note :) —

2039:, "make the internet not suck." A special thank you goes out to 859: 558:

while tempers cooled. What can I do to help us to move forward?

1794:

notice. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks,

1415:

And jfyi, I've elaborated my other concerns about this DRV on

877:: True. But don't we know that they are lions led by donkeys? 725: 66:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:68.39.174.238/Newgatery

25: 1619:...for taking care of my username change. much appreciated! 1198: 858: 506: 720:

Thanks for the Remembrance Day notice. As a cadet in the

2237:

May I ask if you heard about this from the 3RR board? --

237:

Awesome, thanks so much. Good on you for the reminders.

2421: 2267: 1907: 1855: 975:

I had a granduncle die in WWI. His obituary is in the

1536:

I think people reached a consensus there. Thanks. --

222:

I'd love to borrow that as well, if you don't mind!

2420:PS: You were listed after the case was filed, as a 1692:), is now indef blocked for being a sockpuppet of 1454:Knowledge talk:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 7 1394:Hi Nat. FYI, I replied at my talk page. Cheers. -- 2015:humbly accepts the charge and support of serving 873:: The English soldiers fight like lions. 2273:is trolling. Perhaps we should not feed him? -- 1557:result should one close earlier. Best wishes, 992:Looking for suggestion for dealing with vandals 536:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 341:talk page later tonight with my own graphic ;) 2019:that he loves. Hopefully, he won't disappoint. 1359:Please stop spamming peoples talk pages with 1306:Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! 1286:Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! 855:that other big 'n' empty Commonwealth country 572:I commend you to "Poppy Day", first track on 8: 1643:I'm glad this is over now. Thanks again. -- 1994: 1071:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Alkivar 773:Thank you for the Remembrance Day notice. 2076:Thanks for the notice. Is my aid needed? 1410:Knowledge:Deletion review#Closing reviews 686: 1655:List of recipients of tribute from China 68:v.s. letting the MFD run it's length? — 2449:I'm flattered that you asked my opinion 2262:. As a scientist and a chemist myself, 2168:Well, if the formulated text says it... 1674:If you don't mind, could you unprotect 114:Since you've replied, I won't. Thanks! 2422:"user that had commented on the issue" 2292:Nat- could you please see the request 1975:Very well then; thanks for your time. 1210:. Unfortunately, the result stands at 337:course, that means I'm coming back to 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2210:Thank you for protecting the article 2203:Thank you for protecting the article 1528:Can you please close this AfD request 1060:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 618:?, Somehow, I accidently created it. 526:— has smiled at you! Smiles promote 7: 2098:and answer my questions. Thank you. 1956:) feels are more important than the 1790:" is not a valid reason to remove a 1782:I have reverted your recent edit to 1497:I answered your questions to my RfA 697:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar 614:Would you also 'delete' the article 1212:51 support, 21 oppose and 7 neutral 2023:Thank you for participating in my 1600:I would appreciate if you told me 1152:for more info if you like. Cheers 582:which uses some of those lines... 24: 1850:I agree with your block of admin 1571:A request at for unprotection of 1113:So, how long am I supposed to do 604:? I've messed up in my attempts. 484:How ironic...in Australia it was 332:The better question would be why 1998: 1419:. Your reply would be welcomed. 1206:Hello Nat, thanks for voting at 1080:Knowledge:Requests for adminship 958:Special:Contributions/Wormwood66 687: 556:Allegations of Israeli Apartheid 29: 2037:a man who needs no introduction 1784:Knowledge:Images of Wikipedians 1777:Knowledge:Images of Wikipedians 64:Nat, why did you speedily keep 981:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 960:suggests a disruptive editor. 904:well intentioned but no thanks 1: 2520:19:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2494:04:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2472:04:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2433:01:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2416:01:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 2382:05:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 2357:14:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 2343:13:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 2328:13:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 2306:16:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2283:01:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2247:20:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2232:20:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2198:18:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2183:18:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2162:00:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2147:00:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2108:23:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 2084:05:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 2066:23:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 2048:22:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1985:04:01, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1970:03:55, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1919:00:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1895:05:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 1879:15:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1841:10:58, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1821:01:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1799:00:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 1771:07:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1740:05:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 1721:13:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1648:14:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 1638:06:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1624:15:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 1610:00:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1591:21:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1562:14:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1541:13:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1532:Hi Nat, can you please close 1523:06:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1483:16:35, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1465:09:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1439:14:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1424:05:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1349:00:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1313:16:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 1293:17:09, 12 November 2007 (UTC) 1274:04:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1265:00:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 935:22:22, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 1399:22:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1384:19:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1371:19:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1335:07:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1255:23:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 1239:04:00, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 1184:22:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1167:04:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 1143:03:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 1108:01:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 1090:01:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 1065:22:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 1032:19:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 1012:21:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 1002:19:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 984:17:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 965:18:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 952:13:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 917:07:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 896:08:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 845:07:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 823:05:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 810:01:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 798:01:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 788:01:05, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 778:00:07, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 761:01:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 746:23:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 737:22:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 708:22:29, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 675:22:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 666:22:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 649:22:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 632:21:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 623:21:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 609:21:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 596:Hello Nat, would you change 587:13:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 563:13:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 532:Smile at others by adding {{ 502:08:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 466:17:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 448:15:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 436:13:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 418:07:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 404:05:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 373:04:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 355:04:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 346:04:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 328:03:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 288:05:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 270:02:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 247:05:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 232:05:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 217:05:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 199:03:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 172:02:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 162:01:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 138:01:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 119:21:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 102:14:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 87:13:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC) 77:17:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 2043:for nominating me. Cheers, 2005: 1007:Thanks, I will do that. -- 580:Siouxsie & the Banshees 2535: 2481:deleted your warning from 2477:By the way -the commenter 1355:In the nicest possible way 1220:featured portal candidates 828:Yeah, thanks from me too! 644:What are we remembering? 2007:Four years ago this day, 1757:}} high risk images like 1567:Brian Mulroney protection 693: 2395:has been filed with the 2096:Image_talk:China_map.png 1726:Conservative leaders box 741:Yes, thanks a lot, bud! 2152:I second that request. 1759:Image:Red copyright.svg 1745:Image:Red copyright.svg 722:Officers Training Corps 679: 616:The Australian monarchy 2269:It is my opinion that 2094:Please take a look at 1404:Erdos number DRV close 1203: 863: 753:Thanks from me, too.-- 716:Remembrance Day notice 554:Thanks for protecting 511: 2508:commons:User talk:Nat 2393:request for mediation 2122:a discussion and poll 2090:NPOV of China Map.png 1991:RfA for Canadian Paul 1846:Ta bu shi da yu block 1282:I HAVE ACTIONED THIS 1202: 862: 805:Thank you very much! 598:Monarchy in Australia 510: 480:re. In Remembrance... 176:I thank you as well. 42:of past discussions. 1826:Image:Qxz-ad-110.gif 653:I'm confused, since 2405:Knowledge:Mediation 2397:Mediation Committee 2120:There was recently 1901:User:85.178.151.155 1786:. "Speedy Keep per 1763:Resurgent insurgent 1575:has been posted at 1193: 602:Australian monarchy 592:Australian monarchy 116:Resurgent insurgent 84:Resurgent insurgent 2501:Image:Chinaimg.png 2288:Commonwealth realm 2071:Remembrance Day #3 1204: 864: 769:Re:Remembrance Day 755:U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 512: 253:On user talk pages 2483:user talk:Quagliu 2053: 2052: 1958:three revert rule 1194:OhanaUnited's RfA 1063: 942:Winston Churchill 713: 712: 464: 434: 371: 268: 245: 230: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2526: 2429: 2412: 2134:British monarchy 2002: 1995: 1876: 1870: 1865: 1718: 1716: 1589: 1507: 1381: 1368: 1307: 1287: 1231: 1216:featured portals 1175: 1164: 1162: 1134: 1129: 1124: 1106: 1104: 1103:Perfect Proposal 1045: 1028: 893: 887: 883:Lest we forget. 853:And thanks from 842: 840: 835: 758:deleted contribs 691: 684: 683: 627:Thank you, Nat. 524: 498: 454: 424: 402: 399: 361: 326: 321:Report a mistake 280: 258: 241: 226: 209: 197: 192:Report a mistake 159: 157: 73: 33: 32: 26: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2504: 2454:User:HongQiGong 2440: 2427: 2410: 2389: 2369: 2366:Talk:Pelasgians 2316: 2290: 2257: 2208: 2170: 2115: 2092: 2073: 2058: 2031:with a vote of 2013:a new foreigner 1993: 1926: 1903: 1874: 1868: 1861: 1852:Ta bu shi da yu 1848: 1828: 1780: 1747: 1728: 1719: 1714: 1708: 1672: 1658: 1631: 1617: 1598: 1580: 1569: 1548: 1530: 1503: 1495: 1421:SparsityProblem 1406: 1392: 1379: 1366: 1357: 1323: 1305: 1285: 1247: 1242: 1229: 1196: 1181: 1173: 1165: 1160: 1154: 1150:Remembrance Day 1132: 1127: 1122: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1075: 1039: 1026: 1020: 1018:Remembrance Day 994: 973: 945: 906: 891: 885: 878: 838: 833: 831: 775:Tony the Marine 771: 718: 682: 642: 594: 570: 552: 538: 522: 519: 496: 493: 482: 397: 390: 306: 296: 278: 255: 207: 177: 160: 155: 149: 145: 143:Remembrance Day 131: 71: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2532: 2530: 2503: 2497: 2475: 2474: 2461: 2458: 2450: 2447: 2444: 2439: 2436: 2388: 2385: 2368: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2349:HappyInGeneral 2335:HappyInGeneral 2320:HappyInGeneral 2315: 2312: 2310: 2289: 2286: 2256: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2207: 2201: 2169: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2114: 2111: 2091: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2072: 2069: 2057: 2054: 2051: 2050: 2022: 2003: 1992: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1944:A Man In Black 1925: 1922: 1902: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1847: 1844: 1827: 1824: 1779: 1774: 1749:Quick note... 1746: 1743: 1733:Arthur Meighen 1727: 1724: 1707: 1671: 1665: 1657: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1630: 1627: 1616: 1613: 1597: 1594: 1573:Brian Mulroney 1568: 1565: 1547: 1544: 1529: 1526: 1494: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1442: 1441: 1405: 1402: 1391: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1361:lest we forget 1356: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1322: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1296: 1295: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1246: 1243: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1177: 1174:Cocoaguy ここがいい 1153: 1096: 1093: 1074: 1068: 1038: 1035: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1014: 993: 990: 988: 972: 969: 968: 967: 944: 939: 938: 937: 905: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 848: 847: 815: 814: 813: 812: 791: 790: 770: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 717: 714: 711: 710: 700: 699: 694: 692: 681: 680:Here's for you 678: 641: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 593: 590: 584:LessHeard vanU 569: 566: 551: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 531: 520: 505: 494: 481: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 468: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 295: 294:Remberance Day 292: 291: 290: 254: 251: 250: 249: 220: 219: 148: 144: 141: 130: 129:Brian Mulroney 127: 126: 125: 124: 123: 122: 121: 107: 106: 105: 104: 90: 89: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2531: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2502: 2499:Problem with 2498: 2496: 2495: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2473: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2459: 2455: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2442: 2441: 2438:Talk:Re:China 2437: 2435: 2434: 2431: 2430: 2423: 2418: 2417: 2414: 2413: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2386: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2367: 2364: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2325: 2321: 2313: 2311: 2308: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2287: 2285: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2271:User:Cyclepat 2268: 2265: 2261: 2255: 2252: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2206: 2202: 2200: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2185: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2135: 2130: 2128: 2123: 2118: 2113:Moving a page 2112: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2089: 2085: 2082: 2079: 2075: 2074: 2070: 2068: 2067: 2064: 2055: 2049: 2046: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2021: 2020: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2004: 2001: 1997: 1996: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1952: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1938: 1935: 1931: 1923: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887:211.30.71.131 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1877: 1871: 1866: 1864: 1857: 1853: 1845: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1838: 1833: 1825: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1816: 1813: 1810: 1806: 1801: 1800: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1778: 1775: 1773: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1750: 1744: 1742: 1741: 1738: 1734: 1725: 1723: 1722: 1717: 1711: 1705: 1702: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1669: 1666: 1664: 1661: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1636: 1628: 1626: 1625: 1622: 1614: 1612: 1611: 1608: 1603: 1595: 1593: 1592: 1587: 1583: 1578: 1574: 1566: 1564: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1551: 1545: 1543: 1542: 1539: 1535: 1527: 1525: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1506: 1500: 1493:RfA Questions 1492: 1484: 1481: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1466: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1451: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1440: 1437: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1418: 1417:its talk page 1413: 1411: 1403: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1389: 1385: 1382: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1362: 1354: 1350: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1333: 1329: 1320: 1314: 1311: 1309: 1308: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1294: 1291: 1289: 1288: 1281: 1280: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1253: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1225: 1224:Good articles 1221: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1201: 1185: 1180: 1176: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1163: 1157: 1151: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1119: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1105: 1094: 1092: 1091: 1088: 1085: 1081: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1066: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1036: 1034: 1033: 1030: 1029: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1000: 991: 989: 986: 985: 982: 978: 970: 966: 963: 959: 956: 955: 954: 953: 950: 943: 940: 936: 933: 932:83.237.24.149 929: 928: 927: 923: 919: 918: 915: 912: 903: 897: 894: 888: 882: 881: 880: 879: 876: 872: 861: 856: 852: 851: 850: 849: 846: 843: 841: 836: 827: 826: 825: 824: 821: 811: 808: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 796: 789: 786: 782: 781: 780: 779: 776: 768: 762: 759: 756: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 744: 739: 738: 735: 731: 730:Falklands War 727: 723: 715: 709: 706: 702: 701: 698: 695: 690: 685: 677: 676: 673: 672:Corvus cornix 668: 667: 664: 663:Corvus cornix 660: 656: 655:Armistice Day 651: 650: 647: 646:Corvus cornix 639: 633: 630: 626: 625: 624: 621: 617: 613: 612: 611: 610: 607: 603: 599: 591: 589: 588: 585: 581: 577: 576: 567: 565: 564: 561: 557: 549: 542: 541: 540: 539: 537: 535: 529: 525: 517: 509: 504: 503: 499: 491: 487: 486:Melbourne Cup 479: 467: 462: 458: 451: 450: 449: 446: 445: 439: 438: 437: 432: 428: 421: 420: 419: 416: 415:Baseball Bugs 412: 407: 406: 405: 400: 394: 389: 384: 383: 374: 369: 365: 358: 357: 356: 353: 349: 348: 347: 344: 340: 335: 331: 330: 329: 325: 324: 322: 318: 315: 312: 304: 303: 302: 301: 293: 289: 286: 285: 282: 281: 274: 273: 272: 271: 266: 262: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 235: 234: 233: 229: 225: 218: 215: 214: 211: 210: 203: 202: 201: 200: 196: 195: 193: 189: 186: 183: 174: 173: 170: 164: 163: 158: 152: 142: 140: 139: 136: 128: 120: 117: 113: 112: 111: 110: 109: 108: 103: 100: 99: 94: 93: 92: 91: 88: 85: 81: 80: 79: 78: 75: 74: 67: 59: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 18:User talk:Nat 2505: 2479:User:Quagliu 2476: 2425: 2419: 2408: 2390: 2370: 2317: 2309: 2296:. Thanks. -- 2291: 2258: 2209: 2186: 2171: 2131: 2119: 2116: 2093: 2059: 2032: 2028: 2006: 1950: 1936: 1927: 1924:Gundam Mk-II 1904: 1862: 1849: 1836: 1829: 1802: 1791: 1787: 1781: 1751: 1748: 1729: 1700: 1694:JackyAustine 1686: 1673: 1670:unprotection 1662: 1659: 1632: 1618: 1601: 1599: 1570: 1555:overwhelming 1554: 1552: 1549: 1531: 1504: 1496: 1480:Pete St.John 1449: 1431:Erdős number 1414: 1407: 1393: 1360: 1358: 1342:Illinois2011 1328:Illinois2011 1324: 1304: 1284: 1248: 1245:Huge Request 1235: 1228: 1211: 1205: 1098: 1076: 1043:TonyTheTiger 1040: 1024: 1021: 995: 987: 974: 946: 924: 920: 907: 829: 816: 792: 772: 743:John Smith's 740: 719: 696: 669: 652: 643: 601: 595: 573: 571: 553: 513: 483: 443: 410: 338: 333: 308: 307: 297: 284: 277: 275:Now you do. 256: 221: 213: 206: 179: 178: 175: 165: 146: 132: 97: 70: 63: 60:MFD Question 55: 43: 37: 2510:. Thanks -- 2506:Please see 2275:Rifleman 82 2259:I refer to 2212:millisecond 2205:millisecond 2041:Tim Vickers 2017:a community 2009:a foreigner 1755:pp-template 1710:Folic_Acid 1621:True theory 1505:FastLizard4 1230:OhanaUnited 1156:Folic_Acid 979:article. -- 728:during the 659:November 11 534:subst:Smile 352:John Reaves 300:John Reaves 279:OhanaUnited 208:OhanaUnited 151:Folic_Acid 36:This is an 1761:. Thanks! 1680:Peter zhou 1615:Thanks.... 1321:Signatures 1269:Thanks! -- 871:Ludendorff 795:Carcharoth 785:JKBrooks85 575:Join Hands 135:GoldDragon 2452:I notice 2387:Mediation 2298:G2bambino 2254:User:Itub 2139:G2bambino 2117:Hi Nat - 2100:Magnifier 1977:MalikCarr 1962:MalikCarr 1863:Jreferee 1629:Thank you 1582:Nishkid64 1462:Gandalf61 1436:Turgidson 1396:G2bambino 971:Thank you 839:ippi ippi 818:itself. - 807:C'est moi 550:Hey there 343:Sherurcij 2457:bizarre. 2374:AdrianTM 2239:CyclePat 2224:CyclePat 2216:CyclePat 2078:Ktsquare 2033:(47/0/1) 2027:, which 1954:contribs 1940:contribs 1834:. Best. 1832:See this 1815:Mordecai 1704:contribs 1690:contribs 1645:AdrianTM 1635:AdrianTM 1538:AdrianTM 1340:Thanks! 1271:Canuck01 1262:Canuck01 1252:Canuck01 1179:contribs 1084:Picaroon 1009:AdrianTM 999:AdrianTM 977:obituary 875:Hoffmann 783:Thanks! 705:Ramdrake 528:WikiLove 239:Tony Fox 224:Tony Fox 72:xaosflux 2512:Matt314 2446:Hmmm... 2264:1 E-3 s 2154:GoodDay 1837:Miranda 1812:Jeffrey 1737:Kelvinc 1663:Thanks 1577:WP:RFPP 1390:Infobox 1095:Thanks! 629:GoodDay 620:GoodDay 606:GoodDay 411:Arizona 309:Cheers, 180:Cheers, 39:archive 2428:Daniel 2411:Daniel 2314:Salut! 2190:john k 2175:john k 2081:(talk) 2056:My RfA 2029:passed 1930:L-Zwei 1818:Salleh 1809:Awyong 1796:Mike R 1596:My RfA 1458:WP:ANI 1364:stop. 1208:my RfA 1073:closed 1027:Andrew 962:Jooler 949:Jooler 734:Walton 568:Thanks 386:good. 243:(arf!) 228:(arf!) 169:Risker 2127:WP:RM 2063:Coren 1911:07fan 1767:admin 1715:talk 1676:China 1668:China 1607:Coren 1559:Xoloz 1515:Links 1501:. -- 1450:after 1161:talk 1023:up! 911:Witty 886:Grant 820:Loren 578:, by 388:EVula 317:Lover 188:Lover 156:talk 16:< 2516:talk 2487:Keer 2465:Keer 2378:talk 2353:talk 2339:talk 2324:talk 2302:talk 2294:here 2279:talk 2243:talk 2228:talk 2220:talk 2194:talk 2179:talk 2158:talk 2143:talk 2104:talk 1981:talk 1966:talk 1948:talk 1934:talk 1915:talk 1891:talk 1856:this 1765:(as 1698:talk 1684:talk 1602:what 1586:talk 1550:Hi, 1519:Sign 1511:Talk 1499:here 1346:Talk 1332:Talk 1115:this 1037:Note 914:Lama 892:Talk 461:talk 431:talk 393:talk 368:talk 265:talk 2491:ton 2489:lls 2485:.-- 2469:ton 2467:lls 2025:RfA 1792:DRV 1788:MfD 1546:DRV 1380:Qst 1367:Qst 1118:for 1087:(t) 1056:bio 726:RAF 661:. 657:is 640:??? 600:to 560:BYT 500:— 457:CBM 444:nat 427:CBM 395:// 391:// 364:CBM 339:his 334:you 261:CBM 98:nat 2518:) 2463:-- 2443::D 2391:A 2380:) 2355:) 2341:) 2326:) 2304:) 2281:) 2245:) 2230:) 2196:) 2181:) 2160:) 2145:) 2137:-- 2129:. 2106:) 2061:— 2045:CP 1983:) 1968:) 1917:) 1909:-- 1893:) 1807:. 1769:) 1753:{{ 1605:— 1521:) 1344:| 1330:| 1182:) 1140:ed 1137:op 1133:sh 1128:od 1123:Go 1062:) 889:| 834:*H 830:— 514:— 459:· 429:· 401:// 366:· 311:Je 263:· 182:Je 2514:( 2376:( 2351:( 2337:( 2322:( 2300:( 2277:( 2241:( 2226:( 2218:( 2192:( 2177:( 2156:( 2141:( 2102:( 1979:( 1964:( 1951:· 1946:( 1937:· 1932:( 1913:( 1889:( 1875:c 1872:/ 1869:t 1712:| 1701:· 1696:( 1687:· 1682:( 1588:) 1584:( 1517:• 1513:• 1509:( 1158:| 1058:/ 1054:/ 1052:c 1050:/ 1048:t 1046:( 857:: 523:O 521:2 516:H 497:O 495:2 490:H 463:) 455:( 433:) 425:( 398:☯ 370:) 362:( 323:) 319:( 314:t 267:) 259:( 194:) 190:( 185:t 153:| 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index