678:. Will this ever end? Can Snuish keep throwing allegations like these and just hope one of them sticks. I have looked at the previous IP addresses he has accused me of using as sockpuppets. The ones earlier were based in the United States. These new ones I see are located in Bihar, India. None of these are even within 1000 km of my actual location. I am accused of battleground mentality but what's this? I can't escape false accusations even when indefinitely blocked.
197:
I have thoroughly read the concerned
Knowledge policies relating to my block and agree to refrain from any behavior that can be perceived to be in violation of the policies. I humbly request admins, to reconsider the block and give me a second chance to contribute to Knowledge in a much better way. I have learned my lesson and I can see that uncollaborative efforts won't get me too far. It's also worth noting that I haven't been blocked before. Thank you!
415:
is still a major disagreement about my conduct, I would encourage them to open a thread on WP:ANI, or wherever would be most appropriate for the concern (and if I think my action/conduct needs a wider community discussion, I would open it myself). I would refrain from acting in the affected area while the thread was ongoing. If the community endorsed an ArbCom case, I would actively participate in the case and answer any questions.
77:
594:
28:
196:
Furthermore, I do recognise that I have at times exhibited poor judgment that may have been construed as disruptive and belligerent. I shall be more careful with the choice of my words and actions going forward, and ensure I am here to build an encyclopedia with collaborative efforts. During my ban,
762:
I want to add that it's pretty unfortunate how I have faced the brunt of your knee-jerk indefinite blocking and false claims of sockpuppetry. I hope at some point an uninvolved admin reviews both my block and the false sockpuppetry accusations at me. What makes all of this worse is that I cannot do
618:
been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to
Knowledge policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Knowledge
414:
I will be readily accountable to the community, answering questions on my talk page and participating in discussions about my actions in other locations, as it is required. If an editor is concerned about my conduct, I would encourage them to message me on my talk page. After a discussion, if there
370:
Honestly, I am tired of being falsely accused of sockpuppetry. No idea how the admins let Snuish get away with repeated false allegations. I just want my name cleared of sockpuppetry. I am no longer interested in contributing to any article on
Knowledge. It's a shame how I have been accused of
665:
I read through this investigation and I don't see any statement that shows I operate those IP addresses. Do you want to have another look? I have not used any IP address outside of this account. I would really like to understand what's happening here. How can I defend myself against this false
710:
when I am appealing for an unblock. Just because a few users in the past and currently have raised an objection to the descriptor "Islamophobia" (like I have), it doesn't imply they are my socks. FFS, please review CheckUser again. Is there a neutral admin who can look into this? I have read
564:
Holy shit! What? This is ridiculous. None of those IP addresses are me. What sort of investigation was done here? Has it ever occurred to you that multiple individuals across the world can have an issue with the use of "Islamophobic" as a descriptor for
185:
to penalize me for challenging the status quo. The same actors (with whom I have had content disputes) participated in the ANI thread. As a Muslim academician, it is quite disheartening how toxic and unwelcoming this place is to minority voices.
385:
You seem like a non-involved admin. Can you please review the sockpuppetry allegation and the "investigation" carried out? I am ready to provide any personal information required to clear my name here.
712:
644:
486:
569:. When I raised this on the talk page, you accused me of being a sockpuppet of someone. Now someone else comes and raises the same issue, I am accused of being the sockmaster. Get a life.
748:
Do it. I give you full permission because they aren't my socks. I don't care about my privacy. If similar edits is all it takes to call them my socks, then
Knowledge's policy is broken.
614:, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Knowledge administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you
371:
sockpuppetry by users and admins without any proof. Snuish keeps doing it and even called me an employee of MNA, Doug Weller has done it in the past, and now it's
Newslinger.
607:
446:
685:
This has been an extremely frustrating experience. I understand that users may have issues with my edits but false accusations is something I will keep fighting against.
611:
398:
that has attracted sockpuppets in the past. My tone and language came across as aggressive. Also, I was not very good at responding to messages on my Talk page.
255:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
117:
606:
by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one
Knowledge account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at
46:
112:
734:
say that those IPs are your socks. There was no check run because CheckUsers will not connect IPs to named accounts for privacy reasons.--
666:
accusation. This is absurd. Snuish keeps accusing me of being a sockpuppet, an employee of MNA every time a new user or IP address edits
240:
53:
280:
356:
Can you chunk that down. How did your edits merit a block? What would you differently? How would your constructively contribute?
471:
Excuse me. None of those IP addresses are me. Snuish has a long history of accusing me of being a sockpuppet. What's the proof?
610:, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
170:. Nobody there seemed to have suggested an indefinite block. The edits discussed were mostly around concerns relating to BLP.
163:
131:
89:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
90:
41:
36:
84:
603:
361:
660:
334:
320:
515:'s comment. This is all a mistake. I am ready to provide whatever proofs admins need to clear my name.
764:
749:
716:
688:
629:
573:
516:
499:
472:
459:
416:
372:
343:
301:
272:
200:
95:
189:
Regardless, I am open to remedy my actions on
Knowledge and work collaboratively. I have been using
357:
182:
554:
706:
I would have to be the dumbest person on this planet to use IP addresses for sockpuppetry on
329:
315:
249:
226:
549:
article that have focused on changing the same content in the same way as NebulaOblongata.
739:
652:
622:
492:
452:
291:
65:
190:
679:
550:
442:
222:
772:
757:
743:
724:
696:
636:
581:
558:
524:
506:
480:
466:
424:
380:
365:
351:
337:
323:
309:
295:
230:
208:
69:
735:
656:
512:
287:
268:
61:
707:
667:
566:
546:
406:
Refrain from making any snide remarks and comments and respect the 3R rule.
395:
263:
My unblock request doesn't seem to be getting any attention - what can I do?
173:
Ever since I have started editing articles that relate to Islam, I have had
27:
52:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
56:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
342:
Why? I dont't agree with your assessment. I am here to contribute.
262:
221:
Closing as stale only, you are welcome to make a fresh request.
592:
75:
26:
713:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/NebulaOblongata/Archive
645:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/NebulaOblongata/Archive
487:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/NebulaOblongata/Archive
237:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
511:
I have read it and nowhere does it point to me. Look at
257:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
675:
671:
542:
178:
174:
167:
145:
141:
135:
126:
122:
108:
104:
100:
394:
My use of sarcasm and edits on controversial article
83:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
608:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/NebulaOblongata
447:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/NebulaOblongata
314:Unblock requests or on a list some Admins work on.
166:thread at ANI initiated by a proven sock, who was
763:anything to seek redressal because of my block.
715:and nowhere does it say those IPs are my socks.
602:Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into
168:blocked indefinitely by ArbCom for sockpuppetry
449:, this unblock request should be declined. —
271:, how can I get someone to review my appeal?
45:from editing because it appears that you are
8:
267:I wonder if anyone is watching this page. @
612:the guide to responding to investigations
409:How would your constructively contribute?
58:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
676:repeatedly without any proof submitted
545:with at least two IP addresses on the
7:
14:
389:How did your edits merit a block?
328:And I doubt anyone will unblock.
47:not here to build an encyclopedia
485:The evidence is now archived at
17:Thank you for visiting my page.
425:14:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
231:07:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
193:to discuss content disputes.
1:
773:12:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
758:19:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
744:13:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
725:12:58, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
697:12:57, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
637:01:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
582:12:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
559:21:04, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
525:10:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
507:23:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
481:12:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
467:06:07, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
381:13:07, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
401:What would you differently?
366:20:07, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
87:, who declined the request.
791:
352:15:53, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
338:15:30, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
324:19:15, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
310:18:51, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
296:18:48, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
281:18:38, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
286:You have to be patient.--
241:guide to appealing blocks
209:12:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
54:guide to appealing blocks
768:
753:
720:
692:
587:Sockpuppet investigation
577:
520:
476:
420:
376:
347:
305:
276:
204:
70:13:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
543:circumventing his block
597:
80:
31:
596:
132:change block settings
79:
30:
672:baseless aspersions
537:Block circumvention
175:baseless aspersions
598:
441:Due to the recent
181:. There have been
81:
32:
702:Message to admins
682:is hounding me.
661:GeneralNotability
634:
504:
464:
358:-- Deepfriedokra
782:
664:
632:
628:
625:
595:
502:
498:
495:
462:
458:
455:
332:
318:
254:
248:
151:
149:
138:
120:
118:deleted contribs
78:
59:
790:
789:
785:
784:
783:
781:
780:
779:
765:NebulaOblongata
750:NebulaOblongata
717:NebulaOblongata
704:
689:NebulaOblongata
674:directed at me
650:
648:
641:
640:
630:
623:
599:
593:
589:
574:NebulaOblongata
539:
517:NebulaOblongata
500:
493:
473:NebulaOblongata
460:
453:
417:NebulaOblongata
373:NebulaOblongata
344:NebulaOblongata
330:
316:
302:NebulaOblongata
273:NebulaOblongata
265:
260:
252:
246:
245:, then use the
234:
212:
201:NebulaOblongata
177:directed at me
139:
129:
115:
98:
96:NebulaOblongata
91:blocking policy
76:
73:
72:
57:
50:
24:
12:
11:
5:
788:
786:
778:
777:
776:
775:
760:
703:
700:
647:
642:
600:
591:
590:
588:
585:
571:
570:
538:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
445:documented at
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
412:
411:
410:
404:
403:
402:
392:
391:
390:
383:
264:
261:
235:
219:
215:Decline reason
160:
156:Request reason
153:
74:
51:
34:You have been
33:
25:
23:
20:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
787:
774:
770:
766:
761:
759:
755:
751:
747:
746:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
728:
727:
726:
722:
718:
714:
709:
701:
699:
698:
694:
690:
686:
683:
681:
677:
673:
670:. I have had
669:
662:
658:
654:
646:
643:
639:
638:
635:
633:
627:
626:
619:community. —
617:
613:
609:
605:
586:
584:
583:
579:
575:
568:
563:
562:
561:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
541:This user is
536:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
509:
508:
505:
503:
497:
496:
488:
484:
483:
482:
478:
474:
470:
469:
468:
465:
463:
457:
456:
448:
444:
443:block evasion
440:
426:
422:
418:
413:
408:
407:
405:
400:
399:
397:
393:
388:
387:
384:
382:
378:
374:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:
353:
349:
345:
341:
340:
339:
336:
333:
327:
326:
325:
322:
319:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
259:
258:
251:
244:
242:
233:
232:
228:
224:
218:
216:
211:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
192:
187:
184:
180:
176:
171:
169:
165:
162:There was an
159:
157:
152:
147:
143:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
114:
110:
109:global blocks
106:
105:active blocks
102:
97:
92:
88:
86:
85:administrator
71:
67:
63:
55:
48:
44:
43:
39:
38:
29:
21:
19:
18:
731:
705:
687:
684:
680:User:Snuish2
649:
621:
620:
615:
604:sockpuppetry
601:
572:
540:
491:
490:
451:
450:
266:
256:
238:
236:
220:
214:
213:
199:
195:
188:
172:
161:
155:
154:
127:creation log
94:
82:
42:indefinitely
40:
35:
16:
15:
331:Doug Weller
317:Doug Weller
653:Newslinger
624:Newslinger
513:user:Bbb23
494:Newslinger
454:Newslinger
191:talk pages
179:repeatedly
123:filter log
708:WikiIslam
668:WikiIslam
567:WikiIslam
547:WikiIslam
396:WikiIslam
239:read the
142:checkuser
101:block log
22:July 2022
183:attempts
113:contribs
659:, and
300:Noted.
250:unblock
136:unblock
37:blocked
551:Snuish
223:331dot
164:active
736:Bbb23
657:Bbb23
288:Bbb23
269:Bbb23
243:first
62:Bbb23
769:talk
754:talk
740:talk
732:does
721:talk
693:talk
631:talk
616:have
578:talk
555:talk
521:talk
501:talk
489:. —
477:talk
461:talk
421:talk
377:talk
362:talk
348:talk
335:talk
321:talk
306:talk
292:talk
277:talk
227:talk
205:talk
66:talk
49:.
730:It
146:log
93:).
60:.
771:)
756:)
742:)
723:)
695:)
655:,
580:)
557:)
523:)
479:)
423:)
379:)
364:)
350:)
308:)
294:)
279:)
253:}}
247:{{
229:)
217::
207:)
158::
140:•
134:•
130:•
125:•
121:•
116:•
111:•
107:•
103:•
68:)
767:(
752:(
738:(
719:(
691:(
663::
651:@
576:(
553:(
519:(
475:(
419:(
375:(
360:(
346:(
304:(
290:(
275:(
225:(
203:(
150:)
148:)
144:(
99:(
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
