User talk:Neelix/Archive 20

874: 134: 31: 2434: 1391: 445: 1030: 953: 2156: 2058: 1964: 1049:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2788: 1608: 1567: 1244: 762: 721: 655: 553: 389: 348: 842: 2445: 1402: 456: 1650:; since the whole point of the article running now is to mark the re-opening of the tunnels, it's too confusing to have a lead image (let alone a TFA main page image) that shows the tunnels as sealed and derelict. If I get the chance, I'll nip along the coast and get a picture of the things as they look now, but not making any promises. – 242:

multiple militaries as "the military". You also said that you oppose the title "Military women" because that phrase refers to something other than the subject of the article. I am unfamiliar with this distinction and I would be grateful if you could clarify. I appreciate your willingness to engage with me on this subject.

1193:

Unless there is good reason to substitute the template or there has been a discussion where the community has come together and made a decision on this point, I would recommend removing that statement from the template. The talk page does not evince reasons for substituting nor a consensus-achieving

1115:

objected to the template being substituted earlier this month, and I tend to agree with him; I don't see a reason to substitute this template. Has there been a discussion on this subject, or a guideline that has been written? As far as I can tell, not substituting the template facilitates consistent

1007:

I'm teaching in the Education program. More specifically, I'm hoping to find a few ambassadors who can review student proposals for possible edits and sources from July 25th to July 30 and then review article drafts from July 30 to August 11. I'm working on putting the full schedule up on the course

2925:

I don't want to come across as mean, but you did take a sizeable chunk of my own work and use it to pad out what is essentially a piece on far future events as described in religion. You also appear to not want to expand that section any further, which is odd, because there are plenty of far future

2830:

into a disambiguation page; we could bluelink the younger Humphry's entry to his office as Lord Warden of the Stannaries until his article is written. I appreciate your pointing out the consequences of having no article there on search, which I had completely overlooked. However, at our distance, I

2670:

gives several ways in which you can provide attribution. In order to keep in line with policy, guidelines, and the licensing requirements, I ask that you please provide attribution for this article and any further articles which you create by copying/pasting text from one Knowledge (XXG) article to

799:

Hey! Neelix, I want to say that I wNted her article to appear on the main page on her birthday (18 july). Since, i was not able to do the same with the main article of hers. Please, understand this year her birthday is colliding with the available slot of main page. I think, if no this year, then i

260:

Hi, I don't think that 'Women in the military' would be seen as national-specific given that Knowledge (XXG) is an international encyclopaedia (eg, 'Men in the construction industry' wouldn't be seen as specific to any nation or type of business). 'Military women' could include women who have some

173:

I moved the disambiguation page as part of a two-part move I had planned. The supercentenarian Kowalski is most certainly the primary article. I don't think that the priest even meets our notability standards, and I say that as one of the project's most ardent inclusionists. (His beatification may

1719:

articles, back in the earlier days of Knowledge (XXG), long before you were needed on more important projects. Sometimes I feel like I have taken over the work you began. Anyway, this will be my first Featured Article and I have only asked you and one other editor. If you are able to provide your

2329:

your advice (your good ideas truly were the very best copy edits the article received; it is a better article because of you). But what an honour it was to work on this particular article, right? Thanks again for your uniquely thorough and insightful contributions; keep them coming. :-) Cheers.

1309:

Thanks for the reply. I think I have an idea of what you want. Can you give me some technical details on the eruption itself? Was it a series of fissures? If so, any estimate on their count or density? I.e were they distributed broadly or tightly concentrated? Should I imagine something like an

2938:

in Hindu mythology; the Mayan glyph at Koba that describes a date octillions of years in the future, and those are just the ones off the top of my head. If you really feel this topic has been neglected I suggest you make a go of it; don't just rely on the work of other people to do it for you.

241:

Thanks for contacting me on this issue. What grammatical issue do you have with the title "Women in militaries"? It is interesting that your concern is grammatical; that is exactly my concern with the title "Women in the military", namely that it is improper grammar to simultaneously refer to

696:

I have applied for the Online Ambassador position for the Education program. My application is on the Education Noticeboard and is waiting to be approved. Who approves Online Ambassador applications? Course Instructors, Regional Ambassadors, other Online Ambassadors, or Admins? Thanks.

2839:

I appreciate the spirit of the disambiguation guideline you point at, but I think following it to the letter can do more harm than good for MPs. They're a discrete set of individuals, limited in number, readily sourced to the History of Parliament Online, of scholarly interest—this isn't a

1350:

Yep life is catching up with me, and is likely to do so for a while. (start of the academic year). I'm happy to relinquish my role, or hand off my image if someone else wanted to use it as a backdrop. I would still enjoy completing this, but I probably shouldn't guarantee any timelines.

1334:

Hi - thanks for the ping. I'm busier than I expected, but have had a little time to work on it. I'm starting by compositing the landscape, will add specific fissures, lava floes and maybe a large volcano or two, followed by vegetation and then dead dinosaurs. but this is the start.

2666:). However, on the talk page and in your edit summaries you have not provided attribution to the source articles. This is in violation of the copyright license under which Knowledge (XXG) articles are released (CC-BY-SA, which requires both attribution and a similar license ). 631:

suggests nothing inappropriate about the original title. It’s not a good change. Any use of an orthographic projection results in a “map” according to several branches of mathematics, but that “map” does not necessarily mean a cartographic map in any recognizable sense.

2840:

proliferation of redlinks to someone's not-really-notable neighbor. Take a look at all the incoming links to, say, the different Peregrine Berties, and imagine trying to have to sort all the remaining links out every time a new article on one of them was written.

2301: 174:

have eked him by had it been done by anyone other than Wojtyla, who beatified more people than all the Popes who came before him combined.) In any case, a hat-note at the supercentenarian's article would have been the proper way to handle this. I moved "

316:

Hi Neelix. Since you have contributed so many blurbs for TFL, I wanted to put in a request with you for a future TFL blurb. The World Cup is about to start, and I think it would be great if we had a related TFL to run sometime around the final weekend.

2898:

Thanks for the list of the Salvation Army's apprearances in movies which I found very helpful! You mention though that the Salvation Army never wear/wore Santa costumes. I believe this might not be entirely true as you can see e.g. on this picture:

1176:

and this is presumably because there are Knowledge (XXG) editors who routinely change all uses of {{refer}} to {{subst:refer}} in the article namespace. If you have more to say on this, please reply here to keep the conversation in one palace.

979:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

822:

has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more

2835:

at the first one, I think, runs the risk both of confusing readers looking up the son and reaching the father, and creating erroneous links to the father because compilers of lists didn't realize the name was not unique.

832:

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at

925: 892: 2532: 983:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1363:

I will get around to it, and enjoy it ... eventually. You could post to the image review thread and find volunteers, though most people make images of dinosaurs against empty backgrounds, rather than scenes.

265:' given that such women have some kind of meaningful relationship with a military force but aren't a member of the force). I hope that this is OK. Happy to discuss further on the article's talk page. Regards, 261:

relationship with a military force, but are not actually part of such a force, which isn't the topic of the article (eg, this could include the partner of a member of the military, civilian contractors or '

1712: 976: 1482: 522: 2900: 2803: 2261:

Hi Neelix, pleased that you're still focused on this depressing issue! Have only had time to have a brief look, shall carry on in morning. It is looking like a quality article. All best

1623: 1582: 891:, for uploading images and illustrating Featured articles, for gnomish tasks, and for your trust in collaborative interdisciplinary free access for everyone, - repeating: you are an 2714:, did you simply not notice that the source you were citing was a gag (try reading the whole thing carefully), or were you intentionally trying to pass off a hoax in the article? " 1259: 777: 736: 670: 568: 404: 363: 190:". Apparently, we mortals can't perform such moves as the latter. This request seems straightforward and uncontroversial, so I hope you're willing to complete it for me. 1520:

does not even use incorporated as part of there name, if they did that would be a minor point of confusion. In my opinion it is near impossible that someone linking to

1282:

Hello, I have some time to start thinking about this image, but need your input. Anything you can tell me about would be helpful, but I can start with some questions.

2352:

Hi Neelix. The 2014 World Series is coming up late next month, and provides the possibility for another date-relevant list that we can run towards the end of October.

1766:

I have crudely starting splitting articles as I don't know the correct manner in which to do it. I very much respect your opinion what do you think of these articles

1322:

Another question - the eruptions evidently occurred over tens of thousands of years. At any one time, how many eruptions would be visible from a nice vantage point?

2762: 321:

is an FL, and looks like it would be a list of high relevance that has the potential to be one of the most-viewed TFLs ever. Do you think this is a good idea?

147: 1681: 965: 2204: 1744: 2903:

Also, if you do a google search for "salvation army bell ringers" you will find lots of pictures of Salvation Army volunteers wearing different costumes.

2227:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2901:

http://www.ebay.ca/itm/1931-Press-Photo-Salvation-Army-Christmas-Drive-Louis-Roauer-Santa-Claus-/390939480838?pt=Art_Photo_Images&hash=item5b05cf1306

2077:

The article provides no evidence that the subject meets our notability guidelines - being married to a notable person does not itself confer notability.

1983:

The article provides no evidence that the subject meets our notability guidelines - being married to a notable person does not itself confer notability.

2360:. Either one would suit the purpose and draw some reader interest. Would you be so kind as to develop a blurb for one of these when you get a chance? 2121: 2027: 1061: 2813: 1633: 1269: 680: 578: 2831:

think both men are somewhat obscure early Georgian MPs, and there is no mark of distinction strong enough to make one the primary topic. Pointing

2667: 2353: 800:

dont think i would be able to do until next 7-8 years. As, it depends on available dates and her birthday collising on same date. Pls understand.—

1087:

should always be substituted, i.e. use {{subst:Refer}}. Also, it's useful to list the species name in italics for each species listed. Cheers! —

606:

and suggested that the IP consider opening a formal move discussion. Since your move protection is still in place I'm letting you know. Thanks,

1866: 1677: 1292:

Do you want a more panoramic perspective, with eruptions in the distance, or something more local, like stifling closeness of a dying forest?

621: 2781: 1601: 1560: 1237: 755: 714: 648: 546: 382: 341: 2545: 2412: 1495: 856: 535: 294: 2224: 2950: 2690:

explaining the origins of the initial contents of the article. Please let me know if you feel that any further attribution is required.

2474: 1431: 485: 179: 2125: 2031: 2876: 2433: 1390: 444: 2214: 214: 1799: 1711:

Hello Neelix, I hope you are well. As I greatly respect your opinion and your voluminous work here, I am inviting you to review

2541: 1841:

If deletion is the correct option do what must be done because this issue will come up eventually. If you have to do this with

1491: 852: 531: 284: 2855:

Oh, thank you! That's more than enough; I was going to create the disambiguation but wanted to make sure you were OK with it.

1798:

I split them as I believed they now have enough sources to be legitimate solo articles. If you think they should be merged to

2357: 2190: 1674:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2113: 2069: 2019: 1975: 1045:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 517:

New portal on Meta, resources for starting TWL branches, donor call blitzes, Knowledge (XXG) Visiting Scholar news, and more

2527:

Spotlight: "Traveling Through History" - an editor talks about his experiences with a TWL newspaper archive, Newspapers.com

1516:

needs disambiguation. Belden Inc. is the unique, legal name of the company. If it were say Belden (company) I would agree.

2637: 2585: 318: 2596: 2162: 2117: 2023: 1050: 2810: 2502: 2488: 1630: 1459: 1445: 1266: 677: 575: 499: 111: 969: 1767: 888: 221:, could you please start a discussion if you think that the article's long standing title should be changed? Regards, 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 1802:

by all means do it. But could show me how to merge and split articles so I don't make these mistakes in the future.

2228: 2210: 1666:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

38: 960: 944: 1775: 1667: 1590: 183: 1156: 2416: 1310:

intensified Laki eruption, or something more like all the volcanoes in the Cascades erupting simultaneously?

2524:

New TWL coordinators, Wikimania news, new library platform discussions, Wiki Loves Libraries update, and more

115: 2952: 2943:

could be a disambig with the three aspects (science, fiction and religion) mentioned in their own articles.

2807: 2687: 1627: 1263: 1013: 674: 572: 217:

do that with clearly specific titles), and I don't think that Women in militaries is good gramatically. Per

2408: 2875:

I have proposed the reversion of your page move on 10 October, so thought you might like to contribute to

2770: 2468: 2155: 2137: 2043: 1651: 1533: 1425: 1217: 1182: 1092: 933: 903: 479: 195: 2686:

Thank you for notifying me of this guideline; I had not heard of it before. I have left a comment on the

2560: 2325:

who contributed to it did an outstanding job. This includes your contributions, Neelix! I'm glad to have

2129: 2035: 1907: 1041: 2908: 2676: 2246: 2167: 603: 210: 2904: 2276:

Cannot see any further issues with article. Thanks for including me - you do a lot of good work here!

1116:

formatting among disambiguation pages. I would be glad to hear why you think it should be substituted.

2386: 2367: 1949: 1932: 1915: 1910:

I am too easily confused I think I will wait for someone to split and add the sources and sentences.

1894: 1874: 1850: 1828: 1807: 1586: 1525: 1517: 1139: 1112: 921: 769: 611: 328: 2082:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

1988:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

1083:

I noticed that you have recently created a bunch of frog disambiguation pages. Please be aware that

2884: 2746: 2658:

mostly from the two articles on the specific currencies, as supported by the Duplication Detector (

2335: 1862: 1787: 1779: 1725: 1209: 1108: 801: 396: 355: 213:. This wording doesn't imply that this is only referring to a single military force (articles like 2945: 2655: 1771: 1752: 1368: 1355: 1342: 1326: 1314: 1300: 1009: 705: 627:

Could you please revert these disruptive changes? It would have been good to discuss this first.

1008:

page but those would be the main duties of the ambassadors involved. Think you'd be interested?

873: 628: 297:. Please reply there if you'd like to comment or disagree with it (or whatever). All the best, 2766: 2719: 2663: 2659: 2633: 2615:

Thank you for your clear response and civility. Now I recognize why you are an administrator.

2581: 2464: 2133: 2096: 2039: 2006: 2002: 1715:. I know you mostly as the editor who once had time to be one of the principle editors of the 1697: 1615: 1529: 1421: 1213: 1178: 1151: 1088: 1069: 929: 899: 475: 191: 187: 175: 2860: 2845: 2695: 2672: 2496: 2482: 2281: 2266: 2238: 2100: 1548: 1453: 1439: 1199: 1125: 989: 785: 744: 637: 493: 302: 270: 251: 226: 159: 140: 133: 123: 47: 17: 2083: 1989: 1887:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_Usagi_Yojimbo_characters&oldid=371533844

819: 218: 2715: 2380: 2361: 2317: 2194: 1945: 1928: 1911: 1890: 1870: 1846: 1824: 1803: 916: 607: 322: 1046: 2795: 2880: 2832: 2827: 2742: 2731: 2723: 2331: 1842: 1821: 1721: 1647: 1143: 1084: 2379:

I'm a big baseball fan, so don't worry about the link. I'll take care of it tomorrow.

2207:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2198: 1748: 1688:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1365: 1352: 1339: 1323: 1311: 1297: 698: 427: 412: 371: 262: 2617: 2600: 2565: 1971: 1747:. Feel free to add extra hooks etc, I did the QPQ review already for you. Regards, 1693: 1689: 1574: 1251: 1142:'s point, but whatever it is, he is the only one who has spoken up for it. On page 1065: 599: 587: 2958: 2912: 2888: 2864: 2849: 2816: 2774: 2750: 2735: 2699: 2680: 2641: 2610: 2589: 2549: 2420: 2392: 2373: 2339: 2300: 2285: 2270: 2251: 2141: 2047: 1953: 1936: 1919: 1898: 1878: 1854: 1832: 1811: 1756: 1729: 1701: 1656: 1636: 1594: 1552: 1537: 1499: 1371: 1358: 1345: 1329: 1317: 1303: 1272: 1221: 1203: 1186: 1129: 1096: 1073: 1017: 993: 937: 907: 860: 808: 789: 748: 707: 683: 641: 615: 581: 539: 431: 416: 375: 334: 306: 274: 255: 230: 199: 163: 127: 728: 2856: 2841: 2691: 2492: 2478: 2277: 2262: 2065: 1791: 1544: 1521: 1513: 1506: 1449: 1435: 1195: 1121: 985: 848: 834: 781: 740: 662: 633: 489: 422:

This is probably the last of them for a while. Thanks for your understanding. --

298: 266: 247: 222: 155: 119: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1927:

If you think I added enough content for can you separate some of the articles.

1194:

discussion. I see no benefit and only detriment to substituting this template.

2940: 2919: 2399: 1795: 1474:

Adventures in Las Vegas, WikiConference USA, and updates from TWL coordinators

2106:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2012:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2727: 2184: 2174: 1867:

Talk:List of Usagi Yojimbo characters#Split Miyamoto Usagi as a solo article

1740: 2218: 2559:

You can't just choose to put an item in ongoing at ITN. There needs to be

514:

TWL welcomes a new coordinator, resources for library students and interns

2931: 1783: 884: 560: 423: 408: 367: 2787: 1607: 1566: 1243: 761: 720: 654: 552: 388: 347: 2826:

I think the best way to deal with the Humphry Morices would be to make

2444: 1401: 1336: 455: 293:

I made a comment regarding an edit you made a couple of years back at

2935: 2654:

I've noticed, with concern, that you appear to have copied what's in

2179:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was 1739:

Hi there, I just wanted to say that I really enjoyed your article on

1713:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Tintin in Tibet/archive1

1543:

You have convinced me. I have retargeted the redirect accordingly.

977:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Left-handed (disambiguation)

883:

Thank you for quality articles on underrepresented topics, such as

2927: 2511:

TWL now a Wikimedia Foundation program, moves on from grant status

1171:

Pages that link to "Template:refer" in namespace "Knowledge (XXG)"

1003:

Hi Neelix! I am looking for two online ambassadors to help with a

508:

New donations from Oxford University Press and Royal Society (UK)

2877:

Talk:John Talbot (Dragoon Guards)#Requested move 12 October 2014

1671: 2150: 25: 2794: