300:
208:
283:
No. What you need to do is join in talkpage discussion rather than making threats like you do. Community consensus will only become apparent when a LOT more contributors have had the opportunity to put in their views on pros and cons. And even that is no confirmed professional and scientific practice
261:
regarding certain groups of people than about accurately portraying what the best available sources say about those groups of people. You are continuing to make these edits even after being asked to stop by several different users, so you cannot be ignorant of the fact that consensus is not clearly
130:
which is definitively within the DSM-IV scope and the overall subject of abnormal psychology which it catalogues and categorises. Consensus, as represented by the scientific and professional community that mundanely deals with this, is clearly with being that the same is recognised so decisively in
160:
A person who pretends to be, wants to be, or actually becomes a gender other than that which they are endowed with as a biological fact is apt to be diagnosed for the gender identity disorder that such behaviour is symptomatic of. The tenor of the most widely consulted and respected professional
237:
How hypocritical for you to add this nature of comment/admonishment/threat/warning when I see your no less that -ELEVEN- successive reversions of content I've supplied. The way you give such unsolicited advice that you clearly have no intention of demonstrating in your own personal example.
78:, Gender Identity Disorder are classified with codes 302.6 and 302.85 On that basis, any kind of transexualism is most decisively symptomatic of abnormal psychology and I will resupply the changes accordingly as indicative of best practice and desirable.
170:
As noted above, the articles in question are already in a sub-category of "Abnormal psychology". There is no need to add a parent category if the article is already a sub-category of that category. That is considered proper
Knowledge policy.
262:
with you in these edits. Your edits are disruptive, and if you add that category to even one more article without using the talk page to first obtain the agreement of other editors, I will block you from editing for your disruptive edits. -
257:
to a large number of articles, despite the fact the community consensus does not agree that these articles are properly part of that category. Your additions appear to be more about promoting a
219:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
161:
literature and widespread clinical practice agrees with that as a statement of principle and that underlies the appropriate categorisation process that has been and is taking place.
28:
361:. Please feel free to request unblocking {{unblock|your reason here}} to request a name change once you have read and can confirm that you will comply with our
227:. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --
151:. That is the only article related to transgender that should be in these categories. Please stop placing articles in an inapplicable category. --
338:
272:
144:
254:
148:
62:
24:
224:
216:
115:
I STRONGLY suggest you seek community consensus prior to adding further adding further LGBT articles to this category
91:- please do not add these articles to this category. To do so is disruptive to Knowledge and is a clear POV edit.
88:
54:
325:
212:
140:
127:
27:
as it's not categorized as being 'abnormal', by strict definition. There's no entry for it in the current
334:
285:
268:
239:
162:
132:
101:
79:
313:
228:
220:
152:
66:
329:
263:
176:
172:
317:
211:
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits. If you continue, you may be
358:
258:
110:
58:
366:
362:
75:
369:
354:
343:
288:
284:
which a good encyclopaedia is bound to represent faithfully and with preference.
277:
242:
231:
179:
165:
155:
135:
121:
104:
95:
82:
69:
47:
32:
17:
299:
118:
92:
207:
353:
I have blocked your account because it is not in accordance with our
357:
policies. Also, your edits to the project have included a lot of
100:
No. It's objectively referenced per the DSM-IV codes cited above.
298:
29:
65:
because they also do not belong in that category. --
223:, even if they do not technically violate the
145:Category:Sexual and gender identity disorders
8:
23:Hi there. I removed the above article from
87:I have removed this invalid category from
253:You appear to be adding the category
126:Transexualism goes hand-in-hand with
7:
14:
206:
53:Likewise, I have removed both
1:
147:, which is a sub-category of
89:Homosexuality and transgender
55:Homosexuality and transgender
370:13:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
344:12:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
289:12:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
278:12:18, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
255:Category:Abnormal psychology
243:12:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
232:12:07, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
215:from editing Knowledge. The
180:19:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
166:11:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
156:11:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
149:Category:Abnormal psychology
136:11:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
131:the professional literature.
122:11:30, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
105:11:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
96:11:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
83:11:19, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
70:09:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
63:Category:Abnormal psychology
48:06:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
25:Category:Abnormal psychology
385:
359:pushing a political agenda
316:Knowledge, as you did to
141:Gender identity disorder
128:Gender identity disorder
363:basic editing standards
217:three-revert rule (3RR)
303:
302:
312:The next time you
304:
225:three-revert rule
376:
342:
286:NewLabourNewLies
276:
240:NewLabourNewLies
210:
163:NewLabourNewLies
133:NewLabourNewLies
102:NewLabourNewLies
80:NewLabourNewLies
45:
42:
40:
384:
383:
379:
378:
377:
375:
374:
373:
351:
332:
328:from editing.
318:Knowledge:Grief
297:
266:
251:
204:
202:Reverting edits
38:
36:
33:
21:
12:
11:
5:
382:
380:
350:
347:
311:
296:
293:
292:
291:
250:
247:
246:
245:
203:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
143:is already in
111:Transsexualism
59:Transsexualism
20:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
381:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
348:
346:
345:
340:
336:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
309:
306:This is your
301:
294:
290:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
274:
270:
265:
260:
259:point of view
256:
248:
244:
241:
238:Breathtaking.
236:
235:
234:
233:
230:
229:AliceJMarkham
226:
222:
218:
214:
209:
201:
181:
178:
174:
169:
168:
167:
164:
159:
158:
157:
154:
153:AliceJMarkham
150:
146:
142:
139:
138:
137:
134:
129:
125:
124:
123:
120:
116:
112:
108:
107:
106:
103:
99:
98:
97:
94:
90:
86:
85:
84:
81:
77:
73:
72:
71:
68:
67:AliceJMarkham
64:
60:
56:
52:
51:
50:
49:
46:
44:
30:
26:
19:
16:
352:
321:
308:last warning
307:
305:
295:October 2007
252:
221:edit warring
205:
114:
109:Likewise on
76:DSM-IV Codes
34:
22:
330:FisherQueen
264:FisherQueen
249:Please stop
177:Puellanivis
18:Bisexuality
365:. Thanks
314:vandalize
173:WP:SUBCAT
355:username
339:contribs
273:contribs
367:Spartaz
349:Blocked
326:blocked
213:blocked
320:, you
74:Under
119:B1atv
93:B1atv
61:from
335:talk
322:will
269:talk
57:and
324:be
337:·
310:.
271:·
175:--
117:.
113:-
39:is
31:-
341:)
333:(
275:)
267:(
43:n
41:o
37:l
35:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.