Knowledge

User talk:NewPolyarchy

Source 📝

185: 238: 323:
I`ve created the pages about Getmantsev Danylo and about Ioffe Yuliy, but after this, I was suddenly blocked by user MER-C and I don't know for which reason. I have this warning on my page NewPoliachy: "This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Bodiadub (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked
211:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
136:
about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
57:
about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
215:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
324:
indefinitely." I want to request for unblocking cause I don't know who is bodiadub and why my account was blocked. He did it without any explanations so why I should be banned for an unknown reason?
388:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
208: 118: 39: 278: 197: 398:
The editor is a net negative to Knowledge. All the articles they have written have had serious problems and have been deleted. The editor is a UPE.
373: 273: 153: 74: 292: 250:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
251: 201: 245: 133: 54: 113:
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,
34:
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,
192: 176: 114: 97: 35: 18: 325: 256: 401: 382: 219: 162: 107: 83: 28: 359: 351: 347: 125: 46: 414: 355: 417: 408: 363: 333: 226: 169: 140:
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with
90: 61:
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with
236: 413:
Bodiadub is banned by the physical owners of this website.
106:
Welcome to Knowledge! I edit here too, under the username
27:
Welcome to Knowledge! I edit here too, under the username
370:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
390:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
306: 302: 296: 287: 283: 269: 265: 261: 190:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
244:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
196:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
117:, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at 38:, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at 8: 209:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Andriy Bilyi 144:. And, don't forget to sign your reply with 119:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Andriy Bilyi 65:. And, don't forget to sign your reply with 40:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Andriy Bilyi 350:. But I agree, this looks to be a case of 7: 198:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 128:usually run for seven days and are 49:usually run for seven days and are 14: 207:The article will be discussed at 156:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) 124:You might like to note that such 77:tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) 45:You might like to note that such 183: 418:19:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC) 409:15:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC) 364:11:24, 29 September 2021 (UTC) 334:13:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC) 110:and it's nice to meet you :-) 31:and it's nice to meet you :-) 1: 227:09:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 170:09:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 91:09:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 248:, who declined the request. 152:(Message delivered via the 73:(Message delivered via the 436: 354:and likely, sockpuppetry. 96:Deletion discussion about 17:Deletion discussion about 374:guide to appealing blocks 329: 200:or whether it should be 241: 293:change block settings 240: 103:Hello, NewPolyarchy 24:Hello, NewPolyarchy 232:request for unblock 132:ballot-polls. And, 53:ballot-polls. And, 242: 142:{{Re|Scope creep}} 63:{{Re|Scope creep}} 157: 78: 427: 406: 404: 387: 381: 312: 310: 299: 281: 279:deleted contribs 239: 224: 222: 187: 186: 167: 165: 151: 147: 143: 88: 86: 72: 68: 64: 435: 434: 430: 429: 428: 426: 425: 424: 402: 400: 393: 385: 379: 378:, then use the 367: 337: 300: 290: 276: 259: 252:blocking policy 237: 234: 220: 218: 188: 184: 181: 163: 161: 145: 141: 101: 84: 82: 66: 62: 22: 12: 11: 5: 433: 431: 423: 422: 421: 420: 411: 368: 344: 340:Decline reason 321: 317:Request reason 314: 235: 233: 230: 182: 180: 175:Nomination of 173: 100: 94: 21: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 432: 419: 416: 412: 410: 407: 405: 397: 396: 395: 394: 392: 391: 384: 377: 375: 366: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 343: 341: 336: 335: 331: 327: 320: 318: 313: 308: 304: 298: 294: 289: 285: 280: 275: 271: 270:global blocks 267: 266:active blocks 263: 258: 253: 249: 247: 246:administrator 231: 229: 228: 225: 223: 213: 210: 205: 203: 199: 195: 194: 178: 174: 172: 171: 168: 166: 158: 155: 154:Page Curation 149: 138: 135: 131: 127: 122: 120: 116: 111: 109: 104: 99: 95: 93: 92: 89: 87: 79: 76: 75:Page Curation 70: 59: 56: 52: 48: 43: 41: 37: 32: 30: 25: 20: 16: 399: 389: 371: 369: 345: 339: 338: 326:NewPolyarchy 322: 316: 315: 288:creation log 257:NewPolyarchy 255: 243: 217: 214: 206: 193:Andriy Bilyi 191: 189: 179:for deletion 177:Andriy Bilyi 160: 159: 150: 139: 129: 123: 115:Andriy Bilyi 112: 105: 102: 98:Andriy Bilyi 81: 80: 71: 60: 50: 44: 36:Andriy Bilyi 33: 26: 23: 19:Andriy Bilyi 403:scope_creep 346:At best, a 221:scope_creep 164:scope_creep 126:discussions 108:Scope creep 85:scope_creep 47:discussions 29:Scope creep 284:filter log 148:. Thanks! 69:. Thanks! 372:read the 303:checkuser 262:block log 134:our guide 55:our guide 274:contribs 383:unblock 297:unblock 202:deleted 352:WP:UPE 348:WP:SPA 415:MER-C 376:first 356:Yamla 360:talk 330:talk 146:~~~~ 67:~~~~ 307:log 254:). 130:not 121:. 51:not 42:. 386:}} 380:{{ 362:) 342:: 332:) 319:: 301:• 295:• 291:• 286:• 282:• 277:• 272:• 268:• 264:• 204:. 358:( 328:( 311:) 309:) 305:( 260:(

Index

Andriy Bilyi
Scope creep
Andriy Bilyi
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Andriy Bilyi
discussions
our guide
Page Curation
scope_creep
09:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Andriy Bilyi
Scope creep
Andriy Bilyi
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Andriy Bilyi
discussions
our guide
Page Curation
scope_creep
09:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Andriy Bilyi
Andriy Bilyi
Knowledge's policies and guidelines
deleted
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Andriy Bilyi
scope_creep
09:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
administrator
blocking policy
NewPolyarchy
block log
active blocks

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.