140:
you have a following. I can post a link to a video of a song he produced and is featured in along with a major artist? it would prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that he has contributed production to at least one major artist. I'm just confused as to what a reliable source for a music producer would be. So much music nowadays is internet driven, I can also post links to the records themselves, I feel like I can site many examples of music producers that have there work publicized in this fashion. He has a large following outside of the united states which can be tracked by the amount of you tube views his work gets, which is why I thought you tube would be a good source. I would def appreciate any help in getting the article up to par, I have seen many articles with less references that have not been deleted...thanks again for your help in advance
28:
139:
Hi ok what would be considered a reliable source? would an Amazon listing be considered notable? could I provide a link to amazon showing a recent release from a major artist he has contributed production to? also the blogs I noted are very large sites that are very difficult to get content on unless
58:
from
Knowledge (XXG). This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included
100:
deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under
Knowledge (XXG) guidelines.
90:
the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
208:
considered reliable. Neither are Amazon.com or
Youtube. If Muro is an important producer, he must have been the subject of an interview? a profile? —
55:
17:
268:
241:
214:
190:
105:
204:
to see what sorts of sources are considered "reliable sources" for
Knowledge (XXG) purposes. Blogs, with rare exceptions, are
68:
259:
37:
184:
that establish Muro's notability, I'll restore the article for you. Please let me know what you'd like to do. —
177:
that indicated he might be notable. (Blogs, YouTube, and similar sites are not considered reliable sources.)
63:, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
64:
258:
I'm sorry, but I don't find your argument about the blogs persuasive. Why don't you appeal my decision at
263:
236:
209:
185:
92:
167:
74:
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding
173:
Muro's article was deleted because it didn't explain why Muro was important, and it didn't have any
144:
51:
21:
162:
Hello. In order to qualify for an encyclopedia article, a person must be "notable". Please read
117:
113:
163:
109:
60:
79:
232:
228:
201:
181:
174:
125:
104:
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
120:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
36:
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the
27:
67:. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the
121:
272:
245:
218:
194:
152:
129:
96:
explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for
65:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
26:
233:WP:RS#Self-published sources (online and paper)
34:
8:
180:If you think you can find independent
7:
170:, the relevant notability criteria.
69:guide to writing your first article
14:
59:in an encyclopedia. Under the
1:
61:criteria for speedy deletion
86:to the top of the article (
293:
231:. About blogs, please see
130:02:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
50:A tag has been placed on
273:16:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
246:21:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
219:19:33, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
195:06:26, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
153:07:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
148:
93:the article's talk page
54:requesting that it be
42:
31:
30:
227:Really, please read
135:John "Flip" Muro RE
260:WP:Deletion review
32:
284:
182:reliable sources
175:reliable sources
158:John "Flip" Muro
85:
84:
78:
56:speedily deleted
46:
292:
291:
287:
286:
285:
283:
282:
281:
271:
244:
217:
193:
160:
137:
106:for biographies
82:
76:
75:
48:
44:
25:
18:Speedy deletion
12:
11:
5:
290:
288:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
267:
251:
250:
249:
248:
240:
222:
221:
213:
189:
159:
156:
143:
136:
133:
38:Article Wizard
33:
24:
20:nomination of
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
289:
274:
270:
265:
264:Malik Shabazz
261:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
247:
243:
238:
237:Malik Shabazz
234:
230:
226:
225:
224:
223:
220:
216:
211:
210:Malik Shabazz
207:
203:
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
187:
186:Malik Shabazz
183:
178:
176:
171:
169:
165:
157:
155:
154:
150:
146:
141:
134:
132:
131:
127:
123:
119:
118:for companies
115:
111:
110:for web sites
107:
102:
99:
95:
94:
89:
81:
72:
70:
66:
62:
57:
53:
52:Jon Flip Muro
47:
41:
39:
29:
23:
22:Jon Flip Muro
19:
16:
205:
200:Please read
179:
172:
161:
142:
138:
103:
97:
91:
87:
73:
49:
43:
35:
168:WP:MUSICBIO
88:just below
45:Thank you.
145:Nhw001123
114:for bands
164:WP:BIO
98:speedy
80:hangon
269:Stalk
242:Stalk
229:WP:RS
215:Stalk
202:WP:RS
191:Stalk
116:, or
262:? —
235:. —
166:and
149:talk
126:talk
206:not
122:JNW
151:)
128:)
112:,
108:,
83:}}
77:{{
71:.
40:.
266:/
239:/
212:/
188:/
147:(
124:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
