Knowledge

User talk:Nineledarmoc

Source 📝

97: 185:, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee 22: 155: 133: 41: 139: 44:. Remember that deletion debates are not votes, and reasons matter, especially reasons relating to the central content policies of 186: 33: 37: 177: 111: 29: 168: 129: 80:
to a bad article. Feel free to drop me a line at my talk page if you have any questions. Again, welcome! —
124: 119: 107: 154:. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the 172: 164: 103: 28:! Thank you for your contributions. As a newcomer, it may be helpful for you to read Knowledge's 81: 145: 69: 195: 182: 138:
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the
73: 65: 49: 77: 61: 57: 53: 96: 45: 142:, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: 191: 199: 167:
have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by
84: 128:
reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be
158:
to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
106:indicate that this user account has been or may be 60:, and to the consensual community guidelines for 8: 114:indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. 181:loosen or remove this block, or issue an 7: 171:due to the Wikimedia Foundation's 14: 78:deletion is not always the answer 118:Note that multiple accounts are 95: 32:, and the pages describing the 26:to Knowledge's deletion process 1: 156:Unblock Ticket Request System 34:articles for deletion process 21:Greetings, Nineledarmoc, and 200:21:40, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 85:19:56, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 187:may be summarily desysopped 216: 104:Knowledge's technical logs 140:guide to appealing blocks 76:. Also remember that 58:what Knowledge is not 50:neutral point of view 54:no original research 183:IP block exemption 163: 161: 38:proposed deletion 207: 153: 150:Your reason here 99: 215: 214: 210: 209: 208: 206: 205: 204: 203: 202: 190: 162:Administrators: 143: 100: 92: 42:speedy deletion 30:deletion policy 19: 12: 11: 5: 213: 211: 173:privacy policy 169:administrators 160: 159: 137: 122:, but not for 117: 116: 110:. It has been 108:used abusively 101: 94: 93: 91: 88: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 212: 201: 197: 193: 188: 184: 180: 179: 174: 170: 166: 157: 151: 147: 141: 135: 131: 127: 126: 121: 115: 113: 109: 105: 98: 90:December 2019 89: 87: 86: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 46:verifiability 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 25: 16: 176: 149: 125:illegitimate 123: 102: 66:corporations 23: 20: 62:biographies 165:Checkusers 178:must not 130:reverted 17:Welcome! 146:unblock 134:deleted 120:allowed 112:blocked 82:Chevvin 74:fiction 24:welcome 175:. You 152:~~~~}} 72:, and 56:, and 40:, and 70:music 196:talk 192:ST47 132:or 198:) 144:{{ 68:, 64:, 52:, 48:, 36:, 194:( 189:. 148:| 136:.

Index

welcome to Knowledge's deletion process
deletion policy
articles for deletion process
proposed deletion
speedy deletion
verifiability
neutral point of view
no original research
what Knowledge is not
biographies
corporations
music
fiction
deletion is not always the answer
Chevvin
19:56, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Knowledge's technical logs
used abusively
blocked
allowed
illegitimate
reverted
deleted
guide to appealing blocks
unblock
Unblock Ticket Request System
Checkusers
administrators
privacy policy

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.