User talk:Nishidani/Archive 14

381:. It may well be that you're generally an excellent editor, and indeed, a lot of people have made it clear they think so. When we're talking about arbitration enforcement, though, we're talking about areas that have become so fraught with bad behavior that ArbCom has had to draw bright lines, for which crossing them is sanctionable for anyone and everyone. In this particular case, edit warring was so epidemic that hard limits had to be placed. I realize you believe you were absolutely right, and several others do too, but that's not the point—edit warring is harmful even when you're right. If you were unequivocally right, you had only to ask for the input of other neutral editors, and they would have unambiguously agreed with you. That would've definitively solved the issue without all this drama, and we'd never have had occasion to have this conversation. We have mechanisms like 2849:, and not to engage in endless revert wars, POV-mongering, and pro/anti battles. You have twice made, in my regard, profoundly disturbing, and time-wasting reverts. Since you so desire, I will report this, because you are now turning a note made on my page as evidence for future reference (I simply am bad, at my age, at running up diffs archeologically, and must record them as they occur) into some other form of challenge. You may apologize for destroying 3 hours work yesterday by an abuse of 1R, and I can archive this. If you keep interrupting, both my professional work, and my occasional work here are disrupted, much as your shoot-from-the-hip reverting of me in the past disrupts me. So give me a day or so, or apologize, and don't keep posting here. 2643:). He made a technical error, since he quoted the editor Josie Sandercock for what on checking proved to be a short paper by Hussein Khalidi, 'Yanoun.' I corrected the slight oversight, and Shrike wiped it out. His edit was therefore based purely on the premise that my edits are objectionable, and do not require close evaluation for the errors they may correct to the preceding state of the article. It's completely irrational use of the revert technique, indifferent to policy, erratically motivated (NPOV for Shrike practically means here that the content added should be neutral! and not describe what is reliably reported as happening!) and based, apparently on personal dislike of my work. 4078:, but Israelite is still a correct, though more archaic usage form. The people of Israel, Kingdom of Israel, and Israel as individual and community identity seem to have been fairly well established in history, Western and Easter, and supported by archaeology and linguistics among others. You may think its a 'myth', but its a fairly consistent 'myth' that the "Jews" preserved for over 2,000 years given the Greeks and Romans certainly believed it. But then, other cultures have myths also, right? So why don't you bring this up in other Knowledge (XXG) articles. If you are going to start debunking cultural myths, you may as well do a thorough job. 282:

frequently not a clear cut issue, and while I'm sure your above summary of each admin's initial view is accurate, my reading of the following discussion is that there is a (vague) agreement with Floquenbeam's proposed one month topic ban. T. Canens made a comment that essentially supported your view, but added "I can also go with your one-month topic ban". Then The Blade of the Northern Lights added "I'm happy to give your suggestion a try here". No further comments have occurred in a week—while I am not an authority on AE procedures, Seraphimblade's interpretation seems reasonable since silence (no dissent) is usually taken as agreement.

3795:

whilom musky whiffs have drifted across the harsh Wiki plains and editors have locked horns in this heady air, I posit that these contretemps were but a seasonal aberrancy and not be perfunctorily portrayed as perennial patterns. It is a pity that during your Knowledge (XXG) time, you have disregarded its mutually pleasurable possibilities and failed to intuit the need for the occasional adjustment of position and rhythm, and perhaps, if you were somewhat more attuned to other's needs, far from having to employ a rubber, you might be able to conceive something worthwhile.

2304:. All that was required was to remove the quotation marks, rather than revert. This is an example of a total revert of a substantial edit from RS simply because you object to a minute element not in that source. The right thing to do after controlling the source is to copyedit the minutiae you object to, or shift the passage elsewhere. Objecting it doesn't belong to the lead is subjective. The article's lead is thin, the source very high quality, and the remark by Dore Gold is absolutely appropriate, in a thin para dealing with whether such a policy exists or not. 405:

damaging to the project. It's simply that the construal of Blade's sentence, as above, is unequivocal - he was (though I admit he may well change his opinion, or may have written in a way that did not quite represent his thoughts) syntactically for a 24 hr ban. If Johnuniq, who has played an exemplary role in taming wildness on some articles I edited, agrees with you, that is the end of the matter for me, since he is absolutely independent and neutral, even if I think he, on this occasion made a subjective parsing of an unambiguous sentence. That's it. Best wishes.

3474:

Cossack, Polish, and Russian barbarians. Then the German trash. Yet you failed every time. And that was just some of the things happening in Europe. All the while in the East we were forced to live as dhimmis under Muslim rule. Now that we have finally rebuilt Israel, you Europeans will never be able to destroy us. We will nuke you hateful scum into oblivion if you try. Furthermore, the Arabs and Muslims will never get to rule us again. Now it's THEIR turn to be ruled. Let them be servants for a change! Long live Israel! Fuck Eurotrash and Islamofilth!

2100:. The 'horrific amateurish writing' is straight from Segev, and the only difference is my writing 'admitted', where perhaps 'state' would be better. Brewcrewer can email Segev to remonstrate with him on the niceities of English prose of course. But opting to revert en bloc instead of adjusting the one editorial word one might object to on these grounds is spurious. The revert's only apparent purpose is to remove from wikipedia an uncomfortable statement which is, for that matter, famous ( 31: 3249: 393:

opined that they considered the topic ban proposal reasonable, and the fourth to comment did not object (he commented only once before it was proposed, and did not return to the discussion afterward). After several more days passed, no one else had either objected or proposed any new alternatives. I think, given that, that the topic ban proposal is the one that had the clearest consensus behind it.

4459: 1431:, you are correct. Before scuttling off, I will protest that whereas the text you highlighted faithfully follows the form of paraleipsis, my Googling was for self-education, but when I was taken straight to the HighBeam page I thought that some harmless baiting would be in order, with the double bonus of the opportunity of pointing you to the HighBeam application page if of interest, 3141:

that is what you are good at, do not, that is what I am asking for, follow tradesmen around who actually think constructively, read in the subject, and, if they touch an article, feel obliged to read it from top to bottom, and assist in its promotion to a supra-stub level instead of dithering over p's and q's, and thinking strictly in terms of defending a national image.

4102:, in biblical lore, are an historic congeries of peoples, ancestral to the Jews, and neither in prehistory nor today an indigenous population. They are registered in ancient records in Egypt, the Sinai, in Syria and many other places, where biblical lore sets them. In the Biblical account they are nomadic tribes who invade Palestine and wrest it from the indigenous 3388:, he wrote:'Should we be unable to find a way to honest cooperation and honest pacts with the Arabs, then we have learned absolutely nothing during our 2,000 years of suffering,' and went on to warn other Zionists that if they themselves did not ensure harmony between both parties, they would be haunted by the conflict for decades.(Walter Isaacson, 3780:

of, or messed with. (b) What is a 'legitimate mess'? What you, and several other editors do, I surmise. You all know the rules, and use them, not to improve this place, but to rid it, by pettifogging, of editors whose work you dislike because it ensures balance. Don't reply. I can revert malicious disturbances here as much as I like.

553:. I.e. the first is an independent sentence, the second anticipates precisely the grammar we have in the following sentence, but the meaning of the second sentence, taken the way you take it, will not support that interpretation, because it refers to a shorter ban. The two sentences are logical only if the first refers to a 24 hr ban. 1466:, and taking to it would probably induce the same intoxicating dizziness) was invaluable. I'm much tempted, but fear it would compete for my attention with the many books I have lying about that feel snubbed if I google. I'll think about it. As recompense for the pseudo-snidism in my remarks, if you want, I'll tell you how to make 3646:

course wished to write 'wikilawyers'. Those who lay the groundwork of wikipedia do build it up layer by layer and, and in sensitive areas, find their masonry undermined by filibusterers or more often kibitzers intent on seeing nothing is ever actually done by nagging the obvious to death. Too many layabouts who lie about. .

263:- the record is as I indicated, and the only thing that worries me here, as a worker in a barren vineyard, is that, if my analysis is correct, this would be the third time, in six cases, that an administrator has misread the evidence. It doesn't help one's equanimity that Nableezy, with whom I disagree on many fundamentals, 2386:, and is stable there. In 16 odd edits in a few hours I doubled the length of the page all sourced to RS, esp. academic books which say exactly what the FMEP says. AnkhMorpork trails me to this page, which he hasn't edited, and tries to be a nuisance. The discussion starts on the talk page. Within a few hours, he 1843:, with whom Luke played what seemed like a pseudo-adversaries game in the I/P area, one the comic Zionist, one the comical anti-Zionist, was also indeffed. Neither contributed anything to wikipedia in their brief intense interventions, other than disruption, which was probably the point of their presence here. 1928:) though I've known since its inception to be a POV shambles, I went to it and began fixing it. The main correction was to the sentence:'event shocked the Israeli public mainly because the Palestinian sniper was intentionally aiming for the baby.' The two sources for this say no such thing and patently fail 4061:. You haven't apparently even clicked on the link. The article is about 'indigenous peoples'. You have introduced a highly ambiguous historical, mythic term to smuggle in the POV that the Jews are indigenous to Palestine, which the talk page is undecided about, and thus are acting objectively on behalf of 1944:, who provided no edit summary for his reversion, nor a response on the talk page to the reasons I had given in my edit summaries. It was purely an exercise of the assumed right to 1 revert in the I/P area, and the reverter believes no explanation is required. In the meantime, the photo he introduced at 1413:

of sources, consigns me, as the penultimate step for a permaban, the logical consequence of a 1 month incremental sentence, when I make my next slip! Probably it would be more constructive to send slips to the O.E.D. to correct their errors: they don't sanction contributors-at most they ignore them. :)

4389:

The "West Bank" is not a recognised geographic toponym. The "al-Ḍiffah al-Gharbiyyal" was created only to distinguish the 30 deputies in the Jordanian Parliament from the "al-Ḍiffah al-Sharqiyyal", or "The East Bank" deputies. Since the west bank of the Jordan is not a useful geographic identifier of

3779:

Apart from the fact that you know I warned you, as one of the editors I regard as profoundly disruptive here, not to frequent this page, 'abort your illegitimate mess' is a messy metaphor. (a) a mess is what happens when something is aborted. What is aborted is not a mess, but a life that is disposed

3477:

Whose land are you occupying, Christian? If you come from the Americas, Australia, or New Zealand, you and your ancestors are guilty of crimes against humanity by stealing land via genocide. And if you come from Europe, you and yours are guilty of two thousand years of genocide against Jews. YOU have

3473:

A: Nishidani Fucking Eurofilth, I hope all you Europeans and Arabs get exterminated. For two thousand years, you scum have tried to exterminate us and failed. First the Romans, massacring six hundred thousand Jews in Jerusalem and spreading us across the Roman Empire as slaves. Then the pogroms by

2966:

Nish, a bit of advice if I may be so bold. Delete sections like this. That was a terrible edit made by your interlocutor, one of the worst I have seen in how ever many years I've been around here (and thats saying something), an edit he should be ashamed of and apologizing for. Absent that apology, I

2808:

I think you'd have a hard time convincing admins that WP:UP#POLEMIC applies to the material, one reason being that it's not polemical. If you think that Nishidani has misrepresented or that his concerns that he might be being targeted are groundless, why not take the time to explain your reasoning?

2702:

This is not polemical. It is a statement of what happens, and forms the basis for an eventual request to examine the whole issue of 1RR in the Arbpia area. I do everything above board, in the full purview of the community, and this section gives advance warning of the nature of the complaint I intend

1964:

for the lead sentence whose failure to comply with WP:V had motivated my removal of them on the other page. The extra sources add nothing to that page, but merely refer to Shalhevet's death, ostensibly justifying the non-neutral language, 'one of the most shocking incidents', which at anyone's glance

4139:

All indigenous peoples are 'ancient' by definition since most non-indigenous populations date only to early medieval (European) period, for example the Franks reaching the Pyrennes in the early 6th c. by displacing and assimilating the Gaulic Celts, or the Arabs (from 7th c.). The "Jews" however are

3794:

It is of course impossible to divorce the pleasure from the productivity, and it is true that I have commingled the sybaritic with the sensible during my Wiki tryst. Yet, I must assure you that I do attempt to "improve this place" and furnish well-balanced and comfortable handiwork, and although the

3645:

I certainly toe the line of my ban in the accepted use of that phrase, i.e., I "conform to a rule or a standard." My only consolation in reading what you write is that occasionally your bloopers make an unintended sense, as when, in your edit summary you wrote, 'filibustering the wikilayers.' You of

3140:

It's not much, but it is steady, academic or mainstream newspaper based article building. There is far too monitoring, or talk page argument evidenced in many editors' contribs sheet, and far too much subtraction from articles by editors who block, elide and then drift on to talk pages. Fine. But if

2911:

Shrike, Nishidani said that he was gathering evidence, but to document a revert pattern, not necessarily to bring an AE or AI case. My reading is that Nishidani's purpose is to draw other editors' attention to possible poor treatment of himself, which seems like a legitimate use of his user talkpage

727:

Waaahl, you know what it's like in the Mediterranean world Mrs Merkel wants to synchronize to German concepts of the good life (nose to the grindstone 24/7, etc.,) Over a lazy breakfast I met a friend, who invited me to lunch, and after lunch, another guest invited me to his cantina and vineyard for

563:

either 1 day or 1 month, but he would have been, like three out of 4 editors, comfortable with a week. What he thought at that time is unknown. The only admin whose opinion on the length of the span is unequivocable is Flobequean. I think I've outrun the ad break in the Formula1 race in Spain, which

461:

I suspect Nishidani's above analysis is based on a belief that Blade's comment was a reply to T. Canens. However, the indentation used in these comments shows that Blade intended the remark to be a reply to Floquenbeam. I read it as saying that Blade is happy to try the one month topic ban, and that

4433:

I'm curious why you think that this "area" is the only one that interests me? Admittedly it is an area of interest, and it was only when I was wronged in a conversation, and informed that Knowledge (XXG) does not list "Jews" as indigenous that I was forced to wade through the "incremental thrashing

3437:

Hello Nishidani. The result of the 1RR complaint is that you are banned from the topic of the Arab-Israeli conflict on all pages of Knowledge (XXG) for one month. This includes articles, talk pages, user talk and Knowledge (XXG)-space discussions. You may appeal the ban in the usual way. Please see

1412:

have given a withering review of the author of your source. This may not convince you, but it's a nice way to spend my time in the gulag of editorial silence where wikipedia's general disattention to anything but its own behavioural etiquette, rather that precision of content and meticulous control

637:

Polish.' Daily Telegraph 6 September 1980, 9/6. Yeah, I'm a petrol-head - one of my first jobs as a minor delinquent in a gang full of mechanics was to scrounge for ball bearings and chassis parts in rubbish dumps. As fa them fucken 'indentations', I know wot to do wif'em - nah, not shove'em roight

432:

A good case for agreeing-to-disagree could be made here, but I would like to respond in case there is an issue regarding interpretation of talk page indents. I have seen several good editors indent comments in a fashion which suggests they have a different model of how indents and replies work from

392:

As to the discussion close, I'm sorry that you disagree, and realize I'm unlikely to change your mind, but I do still believe that I properly read the evolving discussion and its outcome. Doing so is not a matter of nose counting. However, even if we count noses, three of the four admins to comment

125:

from editing and/or a lengthening of the sanction period. If you believe this restriction has been placed without reasonable cause, please see the arbitration enforcement page linked in the header above for instruction on filing an appeal. The filing of an appeal is not a violation of the sanctions

3872:

I'm not sure why you reverted my edit last week, as you left no explanation. However, I noticed that I had made a mistake in any case, so I had placed it back in the corrected form. I might note, reading the extensive discussion in the talk page, that it seems Knowledge (XXG) editors involved lack

3615:

solecistically to mean 'surreptitiously nudge one's way beyond the strict legal limits'. So when you advise me to 'stop toeing the line of your ban', your counsel consists in suggesting that I infringe the topic ban, not, as I am doing, observe it. Serious editors have a huge amount of their time

221:

The options canvassed were from 24 hours (3 editors at first), to a week to a month, the maximum proposed by Floquenbeam, which T.Canens did not rule out (2 of 4), while the other two editors concurred with T.Canens’s original proposal for a 24 hour block. The consensus is established not by the 4

3736:

Well, I'm closing this down for a month, chaps. No interruptions please. I'm looking for a non-rubbery prophylactic one can hood one's edits with, preferably with a beeper that lights up when some rule is infringed, warning the user to withdraw. Everything's on the net, so I'm sure something will

3502:

You're not the only one. I too received several copies of the same message, from the same (now blocked) user. Over the past couple of years, I have received several hundred similar, as have other editors involved in these issues. This has been discussed at ANI several times, but tech experts seem

3481:

The Palestinians are an artificially created entity, manufactured by the Arabs, to destroy Israel. They never have been and never will be a nation. They can have all the U.N. groups like UNESCO try to create the illusion that they're a real nation. But in the end, all those moves are meaningless.

3158:

Nableezy is correct: just delete this section, or archive it, or ignore it. If you couldn't be bothered, I would be happy to archive it for you. There is no need to debate user page rules here, so if no one has a substantive point (are any statements on this page misleading?), there is no need to

2930:

is an eyesore, with many minor errors of grammar and spelling, and correct WP:NPOV to correct. The Shulman and co. material should be in a separate section dealing with general comments, etc. Once I'm reverted, I can't touch it for a day. I now have to balance getting a report it with dismantling

558:

I took the apodosis to be the following sentence, which is framed as such, despite the two being separated by a full stop. Whatever, 'the next step' in either reading remains ambiguous and thus indeterminate. We do not know from the sentence what Blade is indubitably thinking, if your indentation

355:

Most of my troubles with wiki editors deal with the precise construal of source sentences, which I think POV warriors are particularly prone to ignore. In fact this IR complaint arose out of exactly such a case, the misprision of simple English by an editor not known for his care with language. I

3592:

I feel fantastic. I don't need to explain to you why you are a burden to the project and you wouldn't understand it anyways. Enjoy your topic ban. If you think you are the only one who gets terrible emails then you are too self involved to dabble in the topic area. I have not received a terrible

2986:

I've had a long and tough afternoon with that bloody gate. Nice to see you back Nab. I've made a copy for my archives. I'm reluctant to report people, as you know. It looks pretty snippety, esp. since Shrike reported, and then pushed for me to be permabanned on a triviality, and I abhor, if they

2066:

is not wiki policy, and even were it, it wouldn't apply to my edit, since the nominal subject is a Palestinian Arab who fought against Zionism, and Ben-Gurion's remarks refer both to Zionism, those who combatted it, and specifically to the nominal subject. So this is a pretext to remove the fact

1456:

Sorry, I read your preceding post precisely that way. I was practicing a combination of irony, reflexive mockery by self-caricature, accelerating to absurdity my temptations to pedantry, while indulging in chiakking, and topping it all off with a pathetic whinge inspired by a recent rereading of

741:

I'll have to be succinct for once. Your high-beam hit is as useless as tits on a bull, or knackers on a eunuch, because the work adduced has nothing to do with the English language. Rather, it is a text, loaded with prescriptive (i.e. subjective) intent, for determining proper usage, against the

281:

Nishidani: The lurkers here know you are a great asset to the encyclopedia, and a sanction for your double revert of an egregious misrepresentation of a source is very hard to swallow. However, may I suggest that discussion on an AE issue should be tightly focused on an actionable outcome. AE is

4304:

In short, you and Evildoer are combining to push into this article as well contemporary political rhetoric about Israel's right, as a state of presumptive autochthones, to take over the West Bank, whatever logic, the historical complexities of the issue, and the non-existence of sources for the

1830:

Policy, all sorts of policy, can be adduced to tactical advantage in an edit summary to justify drastic actions. On many occasions, it turns out that there is nothing to the policy claim. I often suffer from irrational, from the hip, reverts by editors who, as often as not, turn out not to have

3411:

So criticism of a typo and criticism of Israel instead of answering my question. That's fine, my writing and Israel's history are both spotty. But I don't heave my narrow judgements on anyone who disagrees with my political views. The sources you've been stacking on the obviously controversial

2697:

This is not a polemic, but a gathering of evidence. I am documenting a revert pattern. Reverts are allowed, but they must be justified on a sound policy basis. Both of yours had no basis in policy, as anyone who is familiar with the ostensible policy you waved when reverting me would realise.

404:

I won't appeal because I wish to avoid absolutely any further discussion of this issue which, as can be seen, only gives POV warriors excuses to challenge any administrator's call and the legitimacy of their work. Admins should not be pressured one way or another, and to do so is, in my view,

3168:

a compilation of evidence. Further, there should not be any gaming of the system by trying to keep evidence in perpetuity by tweaking something in it every week for many months. None of those conditions apply here—the information is very neutrally stated, there are no inflamatory headings or

671:

unequivocal; unequivocable. The latter is erroneous, yet the error is surprisingly common. Most dictionaries list only the former, but some writers are undaunted—e.g.: "Coach Joan Stolarik can say unequivocably that her team will win when Wilson Hunt swims against Wilson Fike" (News &

258:

I'm not questioning the decision. I'm asked you for a courtesy - to drop a word to clarify for me why you, in enacting your decision, misrepresented its terms by calling yourself an uninvolved administrator and making the simplest of errors in miscounting the votes. It's not a matter of my

626:; and therefore probably of comfortably middle class culture, though you mixed in primary school with lads tending to use what is called in sociolinguistics, a 'restricted code'; and that you are certainly not of Polish extraction, and a few other things which propriety forbids mentioning. 1838:

made a brief intense effort to annoy many pages I worked, and assist in the evidence-building for my perma-ban by provocative stalking. He was indefinitely banned on May 18,2012, just after I got a month's suspension in good part thanks to his efforts. The day after, on the 19th

1619:

A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at

227:

Still no harm done, and I certainly see no grounds for using this to challenge your personal decision to close by adding your own vote for a 1 month ban, but it makes you an involved administrator, not, as appears to be the case in the words you employed in closing the case, an

4338:

Actually, I reflect a plethora of maps way before any record of 'Palestinians' emerged in the 20th century which show Israelite tribal lands. Judea happens to be a reference to the tribe of Judah, and Samaria was the claimed capital of the Northern Kingdom of Israel. That

525:

or main clause is lacking. Since Blade uses the present tense here, 'if it doesn't work' in your interpretation would mean 'if the effect of a month's suspension doesn't achieve its purpose with Nishidani's editing' in the subsequent months. What is the difference between

232:

administrator. I’m just a stickler for correctly construing everything but the finer points of WP: policy, and somewhat comforted by the reflection that there is a certain appropriateness in my slip being sanctioned, with a closure containing an administrative slip!

356:

believe in the proper construal of sentences before you hazard a private conjecture as to their meaning. There is only one way to construe that sentence. Still, if you can't see that, then perhaps I'd better get to work on some urgent philological input on a curious

3914:– a Semitic people who live in a tribal societies and maintaining ancient tribal affiliation, customs and culture. Found in Iraq, Syria, Iran, Jordan, Israel (Negev), Sinai (Egypt), Saudi Arabia, Lebanon (Beka'a valley), Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, Oman and Yemen. 296:

Everything is 'interpretation', but there are natural limits which circumscribe the degree to which, in parsing simple sentences, one can be counter-intuitive and subjective. Were this not the case, humans could never understand each other. There is no way to read

2990:

On the other hand, there is a legitimate problem here. I do think this 1R stick is being thwacked about far too frequently on the wrong editors. I do not see my colleagues taking the same trouble to revert obvious sockpuppets and disturbances in this area of the

622:, gather than you are young enough not to have been born much before 1980; that by that date, even if praeternaturally precocious, you had not learnt to read; that you were born outside Great Britain; into a family whose newspaper subscriptions did not extend to 1867:], while allowing the word ‘alleged’, as inserted by another editor responsible for the page, to remain there. The reason given( is itself patently absurd. An allegation is not in a source, it is used to mark that a single source, uncorroborated by any others, 4232:

further trying to game the process. The citation from Scharfstein reflects a religious POV, and happens to be controversial, not a statement of fact. The distinction between the ostensible self-defining ethnonym Israelites, and the putative foreign ethnonym,

3611:? That only makes sense if the project has nothing to do with the 5 pillars, but their violation in order to push a POV. I really think I'm a burden to some because when they write, they are not quite aware of what they are saying, as when you use the idiom, 4412:

Why do serious editors have to keep AGFing this continual incremental thrashing of POV bullshit in the encyclopedia by prevaricating blowins, who make their usual dozen edits in other articles and then zoom in on the only area that interests them as POV

1461:

to cover my secret glee at having a month off from this joint's gruelling grind. I was raised with the street-wise culture of sledging for fun, esp. with 'mates', and can't quite shake it off. The link to High Beam (which I hear as a hi-ball made from

4349:. Most "Jews" appear to have a fairly good case of claiming for their land rights that geographic toponym from which the "Jew" is derived, but which only became "al-Ḍiffah al-Gharbiyyal" in 1950. So to be utterly consistent, those that live there are 3412:

opening line of the Palestinian People page contradict one-another and prove the controversy. Yet they are all good and in line with your beliefs. It is like circular logic, perfectly in line with the Abrahamic tradition. And the Olympics are stupid.

376:

Johnuniq summarizes my read of the discussion quite well (and thanks for doing that), so I really don't have anything to add as that goes. I don't know you or those who filed the complaint, nor do I edit in the Israel-Palestine area, so that makes me

4390:

an area (being limited to a linear feature), I used more common and familiar identifiers. Is it my fault that the king of Jordan had no other Arabic name for his newly annexed territory? So what exactly do 'settlers' have to do with my editing?

4030:

doesn't help much either. I would suggest, if you are so unhappy, to propose a merger of the four articles in whatever way please you, but Arabians, despite the obvious shortcomings of the article, suits the purpose of the list best. The use of

2007:

Ben-Gurion likened the heroic glory surrounding Izz ad-Din al-Qassam in the 1930s to Yosef Trumpeldor's fame. The terrorists that al-Qassam led and the intifada fighters, more recently, may also be likened to the terrorists that Menachem Begin

2346:

It's fascinating that one can revert a text on the grounds that it has a typo in it, or because you disapprove of the syntax. Correct it. But a revert on these grounds suggests that these are pretexts, and one just wishes to remove the matter

1688: 3392:

Simon and Schuster 2007 p.381) That was spot-on, except that it was the Palestinians who are haunted by the conflict. But really, hey, this is wasting valuable boobtube time for the Olympics, and it's not the place to discuss these things

4000:

consists in eliding a specific tribal group with an extensive page about it, by an indefinite term linked to an ostensible synonyn, on a new page that has no content other than a brief lead saying Arabians is the general term for a people

4169:

For these and many other obvious reasons, your edit was a 'crock', and will be reverted, I hope by neutral third parties who can see that your behaviour constitutes an intrusive attempt to tagteam and get round the objections on the talk

1684: 789:

That's the sort of crass statement that puts any philologically trained Nervous Nelly's semantic knickers in a twist, if only because the O.E.D. contains the word he denies exists in 'dictionaries', and therefore he must mean '(legal)

2414:

once more steps into the breach, to simply revert without discussion what I and another editor were discussing. This is the second time he has done that, showing up from left-field in a surprise strike(-out). As discussion continues,

1572:

and back to the badlands, whether as sheriff or outlaw, will depend on 'good will' and 'bad luck'. For as that solipscyst with the Danish accent said: 'There is nothing either good or bad, but Arbcom makes it so'.:) Keep me honest,

3163:

to file a case quickly. I spend a lot of time lurking on noticeboards and the situation is that a laundry list of complaints must be removed (but there is no such list here), and a case must be filed within a reasonable period of

2912:

to me. The situation appears to be ongoing, so calls to remove the material are premature. If you think any of the material misrepresents or is unfounded, then make specific requests for that material to be changed or removed.

1236:'He turned to William Jennings Bryan, who had thus far sat in humid silence, fanning his face with a palm fan, and declared in unequivocable terms that Bryan was the one responsible for this "foolish, mischievous and wicked act.' 2390:

all references to it before even trying to define why this eminently good RS does not fit wikipedia's criteria. Again, there is no serious motivation, just a personal feeling and an incomprehensibly counter-intuitive reading of

2161:. I.e, Brewcrewer, without a reason, and himself, without a policy, are two, and agin it, and I am only one. Such is the 'rationality' of article building in the I/P area. Policy has nothing to do with it: it's a numbers racket. 638:

up yer acre-but get Mick the panelbeater ta knock'm back in'a shape. I didn't 'misread' them. I ignored them, much as many, yourself excepted except in this discussion, ignore the niceties of English usage! Toh! and cheers :)

3616:

wasted here because many simply don't understand what they are writing, either in editing or on talk-pages. Perhaps playing dumb is a tactical advantage: it does waste everyone's time, and does stop solid work being done.

4151:! There are many such ethnic groups, and if you agree with the Nazis, Israelites also would have been "non-contemporary" along with Levites and Kohens. It seems to me that no sources are required to establish this fact. 433:

other editors. I think I have wanted to point this out to Tom Reedy or you (can't remember who) on one of the Shakespeare talk pages, but didn't because it is usually trivia, and would have distracted from the issues.

2342:

My edit summary was:'Removed Beit Hadassah snap (1) misleading (2) not notable, unless we want several hospitals in the photos (3) added an eyewitness account by Perera to the takeover. Text to help editors check in

145:

Just a point about the use of the word consensus, however. It’s a tad improper to use this word in terms of the actual on-page deliberation by administrators, at least regarding.the 1 month ban in the edit summary.

2518:, 2005. Belén Vicéns is an Arabist. her book was published under University imprint. It's in Catalan, and based on her field research as an academic specialist in the Arabic language and Muslim-Christian relations. 4133:. However, I would be happy if you enlightened me as to where in the Torah it says the Israelites were 'nomadic'. A subsequent invasion was in fact God-directed, so not really a subject to modern ethical analysis. 871:

The OED here, as often, is not definitive, but provisory. No one has notified it of the error (I've done this several times, even with Elizabethan words, but no reply suggesting they read your letters has come

4070:"a highly ambiguous historical, mythic term"? Israelites appears to be the correct plural adjective form in English of a member of any given ethnic group with a known place of origin, in this case Israel. 4434:

of POV bullshit" in the talk pages before editing. I'm sorry you feel slighted, but facts are facts. Most "Jews" that care anything about their cultural practices know if they are Kohen, Levi or Yisrael.

3751:

I wouldn't have thought they come in your size. Why not use this period of abstinence to familiarise yourself with productive editing so that AE doesn't have to constantly abort your illegitimate mess?

2879:

Don't preach policy when you abuse it so extravagantly with regard to reverting serious editors and suppressing by erasure impeccable sources. I will archive at sight anything you write here hereon in.

713:, and anyone who has studied Shakespeare is, in contemporary terms, over-educated. But, I must have some breakfast in a local restaurant before responding to your provocation that Septic tanks are RS. 3027: 2131:

refers to what wiki editors add, not what sources day. But the damage is repeated, perhaps in the hope I'll revert what I think is vandalism and provide the grounds for an AE complaint and permaban.

1680: 1115:

what the national religion was, and is, affording a clear illustration of the congeniality existing between the spirit and character of a system and its own principles, and not with their opposites.’

1344:'Neither in Frankfurt nor in Jena are either of the labels 'theologian' or 'philosopher' unequivocable when applied to Hegel.' (admittedly a treanslation. I'll try to check the German 1970 original. 4005:

called Bedouin. The page has no references save one, to the Encyclopedia Britannica article on Arabia, which talks of ethnic Arabs. Thus the Arabians are 'ethnic Arabs', but you don't even link to

3888:

I gave an explanation: 'reverted crock'. Crock may be your handle, but the word, among other meanings, signifies 'nonsense'. I reverted a crock of crap, which you have now restored with this edit.

2001:

Not right away, but over the years, Ben-Gurion even made an effort to put himself in the Arabs' shoes and stated: "A people doesn't forget so quickly that its country is being taken away from it."

4271:

The Hasmoneans were out to restore independence of Judea! What else would they put on the coins?! This did not overnight cause the Levites and Kohens to become 'Yehudim' from the date of minting!

3837:

Seeing your AE notice on my watchlist reminded me why it's been so long since I last checked it. But I wanted to say that it is fortunate for the project that you're still around and I'm not. --

2252: 1953: 1941: 1921: 2579:, 2007. An activist and author, with two books to her credit, and published by a respected educational publisher. Far better qualified as a source than Sandercock whom Shrike accepts. See below 833:

The OED does not mark this as ‘irregular’, a solecism, or non-standard (as Elster tries to insinuate, implying it slipped into use in 1917 and then was accepted by Merriam-Webster in the 1970s)

3974:, giving any person the right to return to, and re-enter, his or her country of origin. This principle is sometimes reflected in special consideration in a country's immigration laws (called " 4353:, and I may well question their indigenousness. Instead perhaps you can find some sources of the Filistin indigenousness claims and claims of land rights in the Ottoman and earlier records? 4430:

You accusations is striking though, as I have not edited so frequently in Knowledge (XXG) as you had, nor for so long, and this is my first dispute, which is more it seems than you can say.

4378:

does not refer to Judea or Samaria (the West Bank) which is where the Jewish people of high antiquity were concentrated. In leaving that obvious fact out, you are openly insinuating that

4192:, so I like to play with words just like you Glen, Glen West is it? However, it does not give you the right to sling personal abuse by converting my avatar to something entirely unsavoury. 805:

You cannot cite a dictionary of legal usage as evidence for the use of a word that is not a technical term in law. Garner is contesting the use of that word in legal briefs and judgements.

2440:

Actually Shrike didn't even read my edits. He saw my name there and mass-reverted. Otherwise one cannot understand how he could challenge my edit to this nonsensical phrasing he restored:

1366:'As a matter of fact, both Margaret Nicholson's Dictionary of American-English Usage and Fowler's Modern English Usage, from which it stems, blissfully combine the term "usage" with the 168:)’24 hr block' (b) 'if we are blocking then a week is probably appropriate, considering the usual escalating blocks sequence. Alternatively, I can also go with your one-month topic ban.' 1849: 559:

argument takes priority over grammar and the time-stamp sequence. Fascinating rejoinder, Johnuniq, but I'm sure no one will see the point (Blade's comment cannot be taken as supporting

2689:

The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes such as preparing for a dispute resolution process, is permitted provided it will be used in a timely manner.

742:

empirical evidence, of the term in American legal writs, papers, and judgements. If American (legal) usage were the barometer, we'd all feel uneasy that Shakespeare failed to register

1041:. No sir, it is the result of respect for you, & for the reputation of your administration, which can only be endangered by confiding too much in persons wholly unlike yourself.' 490:

Ingenious, and I admit I hadn't thought of indentations! However, it fails to understand the time-stamp and placement, after Canens, and the stylistic irresolution of Blade's syntax.

1899:, both to me obscure as relevant to my input which almost verbatim follows old sources in the article, and fresh ones bearing on its topic. Barely a half an hour after I had made 3578:

Do you feel better now? In short, go away. Do something positive, rather than wasting your and everyone's time trying, as many do, to make life uncomfortable for serious workers.

3593:

email since telling the sender to "fuck off" (direct quote I sent to a pro-settlement editor). Grow up and stop toeing the line of your ban. Go away until you are welcome again.

2611:, for example. It's acceptable to the top American political and military brass as a source of insight into the Middle East but not to Shrike or AnkhMorpork if Nishidani uses it. 2710:, yes, I'm strongly minded to report this, as it appears to me that you blanketed a day's intensive article construction without even examining what you were doing. That is the 664:, boplding and bracketed link, Nishidani's intrusion. See note below), as you correctly predicted my Shorter OED does not mention "unequivocable", and some searching led to the 3971: 969:

A view of the British Empire, more especially Scotland; with some proposals for the Improvement of that Country, the Extension of its Fisheries, and the Reòlief of the People,

4256:

use 'Israelites' for the Biblical era, and 'Ioudaioi' increasingly for for the post-biblical era, and their contemporary fellow Jews. and they are in this 'self-identifying'.

2669:

on your talk page either should be removed or you should file a case.This section exist some time already are you going to remove it or file a case again mentioned editors?--

1831:

examined the sources, or, if examined, fail to cite policy adequately to justify their automatic deletions of RS. This is a pattern, and I will note instances as they occur.

4136:

There are many contemporary indigenous people that are not minorities. In fact the largest indigenous people are the ] who are the majority in the Peoples Republic of China.

2205: 3173:

on the basis that it's only three months since the compilation was started, with an assurance that a case would commence soon, meaning within a couple of weeks (and that's

2994:

I never check other people's contributions, but earlier today did and compared them to mine. In the last 500 edits I have contributed useful, often substantial content to

2635:

Josie Sandercock is an activist, she has no academic background in the Middle East. Verso, however, is a perfectly respectable publisher. This was added and rightly so by

2226:

List of editors who have used here, in my view, their IR option with a patently spurious claim about policy observance, or who don't either bother to justify their revert.

4282:

switch between these terms? Are you saying that either of them made a difference to the self-identification of the millions of non-Levites and non-Kohens in their times?

2123:

someone who rarely edits wikipedia, but hangs round to weigh in when the going is tough for the lads, enters to back up the two earlier editors, by once more removing as

2945:

Don't allow Shrike to bounce you into faster action than you want to take. If you're worried that Shrike has a case, but you're not ready to proceed, seek an opinion.

1875:

that the wording I questioned was not in the source. But marking this with 'allege' was, in his view, still inappropriate, because 'allege' itself wasn't in the source!

1098:'s style in the memorable words:'the cloistral silverveined prose of Newman.’((the incipit of chapter 5). Therefore any evidence from him aces objections. In Newman’s, 1768: 582:

A petrol head!? I would never have guessed. That is suitable retribution for misreading indents as you will undoubtedly agree when re-reading the comments in a week!

267:

that just such an 'error' would occur. A 50% error in making calls is not good for the community that trusts in the neutral management of a conflicted area. Cheers

247:

I stand by my decision. As stated, if you believe it to be erroneous, there is an appeals process, and I will in no way hold it against you if you wish to file one.

121:

from editing and discussion of areas concerning Israel and/or Palestine, broadly construed, until 00:00 GMT on 6-13-12. Violations of this restriction may lead to a

4035:

when referring to Bedouins is appropriate, while the reverse it seems is not, within the culture. Perhaps you can expand the Arabians article to a better standard?

3307: 3075: 2821:

The user is admitted that is evidence this allowed but for limited time material about me was added today but material about other users was added long time ago.--

1764: 1720: 2067:

Ben-Gurion said what he said. I reverted this abuse of policy and good sense, reminding the reverter to read the source and note that what he removed is in it.

665: 437: 1744: 1716: 1672: 652:

Holy rev 'n roll, you have exceeded yourself! I dare not ask what propriety forbids you from mentioning, but two other possibilities are that I have simply

2128: 1792: 1740: 4427:

Since apparently you think my editing is "continual incremental thrashing of POV bullshit in the encyclopedia", I will not give you the benefit of "AGF".

4206:. I note that you make your entry there citing Tibetans and Basques, who are in fact Bodpa and Euskal. I therefore quoted John Trudell for your benefit. 759:(1) Bryan A. Garner is not a good source, since we are talking of English usage, not American legal usage. The same goes for Charles Harrington Elster‘s 4129:

to others. I think you are trespassing! It also details that he settled in the land, engaging in planted agriculture. That Israelites were nomadic is a

936:

From thereon in the frequent use of the word is easy to trace, from English and Scottish writers through to the founding fathers of the US, to our day.

2178: 1788: 564:

in my book is more punishing than this. I'm sure the sanction for my absence from the telecast for these several minutes will be to return and find

3354:

Unfortunately for those we rush to label 'controversial' here, they belong to the Judaeo-Christian tradition, with its prophetic vein. - Nishidani

1438:

My breakfasts are quite perfunctory affairs (although greatly enjoyed)—it looks like I may need some tips on improving my lifestyle in due course.

988:, an informing document for the interpretation of US constitutional law, making Garner's objection look all the more weird. You can find it in the 4195:

As for tagteaming, cute try, but I had never heard of Evildoer187 until I started editing this list. I think this would be obvious from the edits.

3873:

cultural awareness enough to edit this article since you have been discussing the wrong subject! Please discuss before taking any further action.

1091: 2714:

you did this to my work. The first example was with the Afsai article, which, in a very brief time, you had to back down from. The second was at

2432:.Usage of bad sources are against the policy especially in Knowledge (XXG) voice per WP:ONUS explain why those source should be accepted at all.' 4264:

Schaferstein is reflecting a religious point of view...its a book about religious rituals in Judaism!!! Doh! However, he doesn't seem to be the

4147:

Do you know what you are talking about in seeking a source for a "(contemporary) indigenous people"? If they are not 'contemporary', they are

971:

3rd edition, London 1785, vol.2 p.681 'and may not only be executed at little or no expence to government, but alfo prove “the only true and

3967: 1668: 981: 298: 190: 895:

The Chicane of the Persians, is as perplex’d and intricate as ours, and the Terms it makes use of, are as difficult to reduce into a plain

3083: 1458: 4123:

Within the culture, the record (Torah) shows that the progenitor of Israelites, Abraham, purchased land in the Canaan. Lore to you, but

3562:

No comment on the email but you shouldn't be discussing the topic area or why you feel you are doing positive work while topic banned.

3375:

Yes. But you really must learn to spell simple words like 'atheist', and learn to read for tone. That 'unfortunately' was wryly ironic.

1295:

to his own family, but he was a peaceable fellow and not too courageous where outsiders were concerned and a great avoider of trouble.'

497:, which worried me from the outset. I.e. in your reading this should be construed as, 'Let's see if a one-month ban' doesn't work.' + ( 3413: 3361: 2515: 304:'I'm happy to give your suggestion a try here; let's see if that doesn't work. If not, then a week-long block would be the next step.' 2618:

Shrike is troubled about sources?:) One of two preexisting sources I checked and corrected as wrongly quoted has been left in. It is

1993: 1637: 680: 3486:

I think crap like this means, that despite my lapses, I must be doing something positive for the encyclopedia's I/P sector! Cheers.

2450:

That means that the farmers of Yanun have lived for 3 centuries. There is no evidence that they enjoy such extraordinary longevity.

2157:

returns and reverts my restoration of the edit after the sock had been detected. This time, apart from WP:COATRACK, the pretext is

1628: 2746:

Read the policy. I will file a case against you within the day. It's just I'm not particularly good at that, having never done it.

2337:, removed a photo introduced by an anonymous IP, quite probably a sock (and expanded a text on the passage the photo illustrated. 1319:'His plans to work in Russia and/or to train as a doctor, though pursued with greater purpose, never crystallized into a firm and 959:, a mutual attachment and a ftrong defire of approaching each other, not with a hoftile intention, but with an ardent affection,’ 4144:

the ancient times which comes with perhaps the best ancient identification of individual tribal lands and borders in existence.

2073:, who has never edited the article, suddenly appears out of nowhere and repeats NMMGG's revert, but with a different objection 942: 2931:

under a sweltering sun. a huge wrought iron gate that no longer functions electronically, and haul it to a repair shop. Life!

2582: 1621: 493:

Against my own reading, I must allow that your solution does resolve, if only partially the awkwardness of 'if not' following

360:

in ancient languages which a friend requested from me a week ago, and stop the precisian's rigour at least here. Cheers, pal.

3727: 3326:

if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the

3023: 1665:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 307:

Though this lies under T Canens' second edit, where he ranges from 24 hrs, a week to month as okay, making several suggestion

97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3144:

I'm too tired to make a decision tonight on this. But if tomorrow springs no surprises, I'll decide one way or another then.

1826:

Immediate reverting of my work, and, if they occur in my regard, meatpuppetry, sockpuppetry, tagteaming. Personal ref notes

3512: 3510: 3508: 3506: 3504: 2557:, 2012 (A perfectly respectable, well-reviewed source for non-controversial material on the environment and ruins of Yanin. 1608:

If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to

927:

les chicans des Persans est aussie embarrassée que la nôtre, et les termes don’t elle se sert, aussi difficiles à réduire

3255: 1860:-ther wording simply is not in the source - that put over a thesis as a matter of fact. While this was under discussion 1609: 3514:

It is another serial vandal, who gets his jollies from foul racism combimned with threats of violence and sexual abuse.

2492: 2700:

The IR rule does not allow editors to blanket relevantly sourced material published under academic imprint, as you did.

1168:

In the treaty of Capitulation every condition agreed upon both as to time and manner must be expressed in precise and

1137:'Our language provides numerous equivalents or synonyms for this grand function, and most of them are intelligible and 3039: 2588: 2475: 2375: 1478:

on toast (provided link to avoid confusion with the 'breakfast of champions', as feminists, not smokers or readers of

1662: 1397:

Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2000, Volume 10, pp.153-165, p.155, cites an authority that geology has failed to yield

4466: 3327: 3313: 3291: 2545: 2208:, and redress, in the form of an apology, was obtained. All the brouhaha because of a failure to inquire or discuss 1518:

is tempting, but while I do cook, it's at a very basic level. Also, I think I've taken enough of your time lately!

1393:

The learned author of the article on סְדֹם (Sodom) in Johannes Botterweck,Helmer Ringgren,Heinz-Josef Fabry (eds.),

38: 4198:

Nor am I 'getting around' the objections raised in the talk page. Its just that the subject of the objections was

3723: 3650:

primarily means acquiring some grammatical and lexical mastery of one's mother-tongue. You have a long way to go.

3340: 3071: 2541: 2498: 1595:

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

855: 610: 820:

Garner has not consulted the OED which registers all usage, not English legal usage, which is his limited brief.

3059: 3019: 2292: 2189:, rephrasing a legend to clarify that a map is conjectural, not, as before, a universally acknowledged “fact”. 1925: 1760: 3169:

accusations, and the tweaking is constructive. Take your time: I have seen much more incendiary pages survive

2270: 2154: 2101: 2026: 1027:

The Papers of James Monroe: A documentary history of the presidential tours of James Monroe, 1817, 1818, 1819,

618:

From your unfamiliarity with the adverbial form, I can, with Sherlockian intuition, abetted by some help from

311:, the remark cannot but be read as endorsing his first proposal, which TC had not abandoned, i.e. a 24 hr ban. 3664:

Nish, I would just recommend you ignore Cptnono. He is clearly trying to lure you into violating your TBAN. -

3357:

Does this mean that anyone you perceive as pro-Israeli must be either a Jewish or Christian religious wacko?

2544:, 2006. Robert Blecher, holds a PhD in Syrian history. He is an academic, an Arabist, and now works with the 1568:

Ah yes, the use of 'good' as a moral qualifier, and not as an epithet for competency (good at)! Well, out of

1334:

The Incarnation of God:An Introduction to Hegel's Theological Thought as Prolegomena to a Future Christology,

774:‘The dictionaries contain only unequivocal, though undaunted lawyers and judges have written *unequivocable’. 4275: 3098: 2505: 2503:

Biblical Researches in Palestine and the adjacent regions: a journal of Travels in the years 1838 and 1852 ,

2459:

I.e. communities exist over time, local farmers, individuals do not normally survive a century, let alone 3.

2280: 2150:

was of course indeffed as a sock almost immediately - he has a signature that declares itself in most edits.

2147: 2120: 1244: 3808: 3765: 2097: 1192: 3548:

If you received that via Knowledge (XXG) email, the person can be blocked from sending mail. Let me know.

3417: 3365: 3248: 3015: 1712: 518: 138:

Just a brief response on a technical point, before all this nonsense is archived and I clank in my chains!

2591:. This is a respected American, Washington based think tank whose balanced reportage has been praised by 2158: 1427:

If you think that a wall of nicely formatted text, with links, is going to dissuade me from following my

1049:

Report of the Secretary of Internal Affairs of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, E.K. Meyers, 1887 p.293.

1015:'that the contemplated repeal, taken in connection with the known and avowed object of the repeal, is an 216:

extended to a a week or indeed a month, if, presumably, Floqueanbeam's maximalist position was agreed to.

4474: 3722:

I feel so silly! I just assumed that he was talking about intellectual property or internet protocol.—

3295: 3260: 3086: 2715: 2233: 1881: 1835: 847: 4265: 3922:– An ethno-religious group of the Eastern Mediterranean with recorded settlement in the area of modern 3323: 2063: 378: 4439: 4395: 4358: 4287: 4211: 4156: 4083: 4040: 3896: 3878: 3798: 3755: 2371: 980:

In colonial, revolutionary and the then independent USA, the term reverberated in the writings of the

3943: 3842: 3553: 3447: 3385: 3336: 3205:

Good to see you around. I am not sure if you have heard of it yet, but Birzeit University launched a

3106: 3035: 2566:

News, 21 October 2002. Extraordinary how, when I use the BBC as an RS, its reliability is questioned.

2264: 2257: 2037: 2015: 1985: 1957: 1949: 1736: 1616:. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration. 1569: 1153: 710: 545:

solution proposed is dysfunctional'(in the months or years following the expiration of the ban), and

2093: 4491: 4418: 4279: 4249: 4175: 3857: 3785: 3742: 3708:

is to come over as vulgar and loudmouthed in an attempt to elicit careless responses from people. -

3695: 3655: 3583: 3535: 3491: 3398: 3229: 3149: 3130: 3094: 2936: 2884: 2854: 2751: 2723: 2666: 2648: 2592: 2554: 2400: 2352: 2309: 2213: 2166: 2136: 2109: 1974: 1578: 1544: 1505: 1496:

ps. As a final piece of philological arcana might I add that 'in due course' is a great tribute to

1487: 1418: 718: 643: 623: 573: 410: 365: 272: 238: 172: 47: 17: 4469:

talk page, namely Assume Good Faith and No Personal Attacks. I will report you, if this continues.

1952:

who then, after a talk page discussion, subsequently removed it. The contentious matter remained.

762:

The Big Book Of Beastly Mispronunciations: The Complete Opinionated Guide for the Careful Speaker,

684: 114: 3275: 3186: 2970: 2948: 2915: 2812: 2604: 2468: 1784: 1559: 1523: 1443: 1006: 989: 692: 676: 594: 467: 394: 287: 248: 127: 1896: 541:

The difference is that the first means 'Let's try that solution out'.; the second 'Let's see if

122: 4125: 3975: 3963: 3947: 3713: 3669: 3598: 3567: 3520: 3214: 3134: 3126: 3110: 2636: 2488: 2383: 2298: 1816: 1405: 1332: 1095: 985: 968: 946: 894: 760: 4268:

participating in the editing of this article. In what way is it controversial and not a fact?

2429: 1966: 1385: 1376: 1167: 1127: 1099: 1069: 765:

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2006 pp.4 79-480) since, in challenging ‘unequivocable’ (Garner's

687:

as Google shows plenty of examples to suggest that the quoted claim is overly unequivocable.

118: 4470: 4062: 3051: 3007: 2870: 2826: 2779: 2765: 2737: 2674: 2599:, and which prints opinions and research by established scholars in the field (a short list 2596: 2246: 1917: 1840: 902: 851: 183: 3170: 2533:

Robert Blecher, 'Living on the Edge: The Threat of "Transfer" in Israel and Palestine,' in

2194: 1908: 513:

The problem however is grammatical, and the sequential implications in standard English of

386: 4309:

to Palestine allow us to say. The POV pushing comes out clearly in your formulation above:

3959: 3951: 3939: 3838: 3549: 3443: 3286: 3063: 2684:

Please read the policy. I am taking diffs of problematical editing according precisely to

2508:, 1856. This remains cited, but the additional material I added from the page was removed. 2326: 2275: 2191:

The explanation apparently was that my edit has something to do with “enemies of Israel”.

2070: 1945: 1633:

Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage

846:

Like so many entries in the OED, the earliest usage only registers what OED readers, like

619: 565: 3431: 2690: 2659: 2462: 2392: 2055:

On more than one occasion, he said that if he were Arab, he too would fight the Zionists.

2003:

On more than one occasion, he said that if he were Arab, he too would fight the Zionists.

1892: 1857: 885:

The adjective actually goes back at least to the abridged, English translation (1720) of

382: 107: 4114:

who may have been indigenous to a country. Thirdly, you provided no source saying these

4487: 4414: 4171: 3853: 3781: 3738: 3691: 3651: 3579: 3531: 3487: 3394: 3381: 3225: 3145: 3003: 2932: 2880: 2850: 2747: 2719: 2644: 2521: 2396: 2348: 2305: 2209: 2162: 2132: 2105: 1970: 1574: 1540: 1501: 1483: 1414: 1409: 1382: 1123: 714: 639: 569: 406: 361: 268: 234: 161: 4495: 4478: 4443: 4422: 4399: 4362: 4291: 4215: 4179: 4160: 4087: 4044: 3900: 3882: 3861: 3846: 3815: 3789: 3772: 3746: 3731: 3717: 3699: 3673: 3659: 3602: 3587: 3571: 3557: 3539: 3525: 3495: 3451: 3421: 3402: 3369: 3344: 3233: 3218: 3190: 3153: 2977: 2952: 2940: 2919: 2888: 2874: 2858: 2830: 2816: 2783: 2769: 2755: 2741: 2727: 2678: 2652: 2404: 2356: 2313: 2217: 2170: 2140: 2113: 1978: 1929: 1884:, I entered and added substantial RS content bearing on the quotation and its context. 1820: 1648: 1582: 1563: 1548: 1527: 1509: 1491: 1447: 1422: 722: 696: 658:

I am, however, smart enough to not argue with you on a point of language; nevertheless

647: 598: 577: 471: 414: 399: 369: 291: 276: 253: 242: 132: 3280: 3267: 3182: 3137:, which was all narrative editorializing by some amateur historian with a bad memory. 2560: 2284: 1807:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1727: 1555: 1519: 1479: 1439: 1179: 688: 590: 463: 283: 3690:

it's hard to keep mum when one's mother tongue is twisted out of shape and crippled.

3133:. The only time I removed material without then adding to it by compensation was at 1911:

see talk.', i.e. rather than reply he found a policy to preemptively remove my work.

1470:

out of potato starch. A slice of that, with Neapolitan coffee topped with a dash of

709:. You can't be 'insufficiently educated' since kids are exposed to that by studying 429:

Response to Nishidani's reply to me above starting "Everything is 'interpretation'".

301:'s comment than in terms of T.Canens' first proposal.Let's print it without bolding. 4383: 4314:'An ethno-religious group of the Eastern Mediterranean with recorded settlement in 3709: 3665: 3612: 3594: 3563: 3516: 3482:

They will never, ever, destroy or reduce Israel, even if Israel has weak leaders.'

3210: 2774:

There other users mentioned except of me you going to file case against them too?--

2608: 2569: 2482:

The Discourse of Palestinian-Israeli Relations: Persistent Analytics and Practices,

2379: 2088:'who on occasion admitted that were he an Arab, he would have fought the Zionists,' 1812: 1808: 1799: 1277: 1223: 1149: 993: 886: 3852:

Thanks pal. I'd gladly exchange my presence here for a return of your equable eye.

2456:'Yanun's Palestinian farming community has worked its fields for three centuries.' 1948:, and which I had removed with the contentious content, was initially restored by 1328: 483:, since details lose most and no one should be expected to press on through them.) 3310:. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page 2010:. Here is a basis for another riveting discussion about statesmanship and terror. 1354: 1307: 1281: 1226: 1025: 1000: 914:

This reprinted a version in 8 volumes by Edmond Lloyd, London, 1720 of Chardin’s

4435: 4391: 4354: 4283: 4207: 4152: 4079: 4036: 4027: 4023: 3892: 3874: 3530:

Not too worried by threats of sexual abuse when they come from a chronic wanker.

3464: 3102: 2866: 2822: 2775: 2761: 2733: 2670: 2534: 2417:

he blankets my 16 odd edits that raised the content of the page from 6kb to 12kb

2411: 2239: 2190: 1885: 1861: 1775: 1645: 1613: 1087: 706: 661: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3442:. The ban expires on October 6. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, 3317: 2127:

a clause which comes direct from the source. False policy justification again.

1644:

Thanks for helping make Knowledge (XXG) better. Enjoy your research! Cheers,

1300:

In scholarship, philosophy and biblical studies esp. the word is a commonplace.

588:

le"? My monitor is resting on my Shorter OED so I won't investigate its origin.

517:. (a) 'if it doesn't work' is a conditional clause, which provides us with the 222:

arbs, but by your closing the case (3/2) in favour of Floquenbeam’s suggestion.

197:) because he then adds 'If not, then a week-long block would be the next step.' 4115: 4103: 4099: 4057: 3918: 3300: 3118: 2041: 1497: 2623:

Peace Under Fire: Israel/Palestine and the International Solidarity Movement,

4239: 4118:

are listed as a (contemporary) indigenous people. There are no such sources.

4075: 3114: 3047: 3031: 3011: 2732:

You admit yourself that is evidence hence either file a case or remove it.--

2603:. It has been adduced, and not challenged, on several wiki I/P articles, at 2576: 2484: 1989: 1350: 3891:

You are rude as well as ill-informed and tending towards being misleading.

975:

of augmenting the national revenue with which the reported is acquainted”.'

2574:

Witness in Palestine: A Jewish American Woman in the Occupied Territories,

1178:

This freely adapts the German text (Mitter und sohn, 1902 p.38) which has

1060:

of their earnest desire to promote peace and harmony with a sister state.'

921:

The French original does not contain that word. Lloyd's version translates

909:

Dover reprint 1988 of the the Argonaut Press imprint of 1927, pp.122-123).

444:

Thus, I propose a one month I/P topic ban...Floquenbeam 20:47, 4 May 2012

4253: 3997: 3993: 3979: 3910: 3737:

turn up to ensure protection as I continue my intercourse with wikipedia.

3460:

Just as a curious coincidence, I found this in the mailbox this morning.

2018:, which I have edited with substantial content on 5occasions before, and 1751: 1695: 1475: 1463: 1303: 522: 3704:

Yeah, I can relate. But, in case you haven't already noticed, Cptnono's

858:, tell them what the results of their intense if desultory readings are. 4330: 4071: 3935: 3055: 2865:

I am not desire anything I only desire that you comply with policies.--

2045: 2036:

What he removed are words taken directly from Tom Segev's paragraph on

1471: 1101:

Certain difficulties felt by Anglicans in Catholic teaching considered,

743: 679:

and if that link does not work but you would like it to, add your name

3360:

Did you ever read "Why I became a Zionist" by athiest Albert Einstein?

2029:, who hitherto had made just one prior edit to that article in 2009. 1916:(3) Seeing dubious language and matter and photos introduced into the 1661:

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to

4322: 4317: 3955: 3927: 3923: 3206: 3122: 3067: 2999: 2320: 1056:'Yet this state (of Virginia) determining to give the world the most 955:'Their eyes fparkle, their features and geftures demonftrate, in the 630: 603:

The shorter OED ignores all the really interesting words in English.

142:

That’s fine by me, since it’s more or less what I imposed on myself.

4343:

read political overtones into the editing only says something about

2572:, 'Outposts, Settler Violence, & the Village of Yanoun,' in her 2331:

bad writing replete with typos. please try again and be more careful

2987:

arise in myself, vindictive feelings or actions stemming from them.

916:

Voyages du chevalier Chardin en Perse, et autres lieux de l’Orient,

4326: 4019: 4006: 3931: 3090: 3079: 2995: 2927: 2707: 2625: 2528: 2364: 2092:

Brewcrewer's revert has no basis in policy, except to illustrate

4382:

includes the West Bank. I.e. you are pushing the settler POV of

3043: 1603: 656:

everything prior to 1980, or that I am insufficiently educated.

3380:

Einstein actually fitted the prophetic profile. In a letter to

2587:, Settlement Report | Vol. 12 No. 6 | November-December 2002], 3243: 3028:

United Nations resolution on Israeli settlement activity, 2011

2563: 2539:

The Struggle for Sovereignty: Palestine And Israel, 1993-2005,

2031:

with the edit summary, 'removing the coat from the rack', here

1988:. In my daily reading of Haaretz, I come across an article by 1703: 1699: 1681:

United Nations resolution on Israeli settlement activity, 2011

25: 4244:

used as its official term 'Judeans' to self-define, and used

2333:

repeats his use of the revert option. What was he reverting?

947:

The philosophy of natural history Edinburgh vol.1, 1780 p.416

212:, provisory because T Canens, on deeper review, allowed this 208:

ban, there was a provisory consensus (majority) for a 24 hr.

4457: 4110:

who are listed as 'indigenous' minorities. It does not list

3272:, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was 2119:

What then happens? The ring-in syndrome. Out of left field,

2283:

Blocked almost immediately and indefinitely as a suspected

4486:

Gee whiz! I'm pooping myself. What a fright! Oh dearie me.

4140:

fairly unique in that they have claimed a place of origin

2445:

Local farmers have lived in Yanun since the 18th century.

1936:

This basic correction to the lead was quickly reverted by

1104:

Longmans, Green, and Co, London 1850 p.49 you will read:-

1002:

Jefferson in power: the death struggle of the Federalists,

453:

I'm happy to give your suggestion a try...Blade 5 May 2012

4237:

on the Israelites by outsiders ignores the fact that the

4074:, is not the correct grammatical adjective that would be 2465:

Sources. Shrike contests my using the following sources:

1072:, (1903) Bod 2010 reprint p.87 has an example from 1839. 1850:

The bride is beautiful but she is married to another man

1079:'I must prove them by the most unequivocable testimony.’ 4229: 4026:

deal with the entirety of the global Arab populations.

3439: 2640: 2600: 2416: 2387: 2334: 2330: 2301: 2201: 2198: 2186: 2182: 2151: 2124: 2074: 2030: 2019: 1961: 1937: 1905:

blanketed indiscriminately the whole of my contribution

1904: 1900: 1888: 1872: 1864: 1853: 1599:

The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.

264: 152:

consensus present for a 1-month topic ban from the area

147: 3181:

the compilation was unedited and unused for a month).

2005:

Here is Ben-Gurion as a justifier of Arab patriotism.

918:

which had appeared to acclaim 9 years earlier in 1711.

769:

OUP 2011 p.913) the sentence you quote is followed by:

4014:

The article is a list of indigenous peoples. Had you

2526:

The Road Map to Nowhere: Israel/Palestine Since 2003,

204:

As you can see, there was no consensus for a 1 month

3972:

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

3306:

The nomination discussion and review may be seen at

2845:

Shrike. Look at my editing. I actually work here to

854:

in his fascinating piece of biographical detection,

609::'Capable of only one interpretation, unambiguous'.( 447:

Reply to Jujitsuguy...Floquenbeam 21:37, 4 May 2012

348:

construction, in the context of escalating periods (

1640:

to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

1591:

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready

113:Under a violation of restrictions imposed from the 3978:") which facilitate or encourage the reunion of a 3457:Thanks Ed. No, no appeal. That strikes me as just. 4202:, as I informed when I began editing. Its called 450:Looks like I missed...T. Canens 22:15, 4 May 2012 1154:Imperial German General Staff (Grossgeneralstab) 3308:Template:Did you know nominations/Ali Abu Awwad 1337:Continuum International Publishing Group, p.150 669: 568:has lost the lead, or is that the lede? Cheers. 4022:article, you will have seen that it, like the 3209:. I thought you might enjoy that. Take care! - 2703:to raise when the opportunity presents itself. 1128:Dissertations on leading philosophical topics, 1070:Gossip in the First Decade of Victoria's Reign 150:(‘Nishidani: Discussion looks to be complete, 2718:. You haven't learn the lesson and persist. 1996:at Haaretz, 22 June, 2012. It reads in part:- 1388:Bar-Ilan University Press/E.J.Brill,1986 p.26 1005:Houghton Mifflin company, 1936 p.127, Citing 996:'s papers, and contemporary state documents. 666:Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style 8: 3284:, who is featured in the award-winning film 2926:The pity of this is that the bloody page at 2487:, 2010 The author is Assistant Professor of 2287:sock, which was obvious from his first edit. 1657:Disambiguation link notification for June 28 1474:is as good a way to start the day as eating 1395:Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, 1227:Clarence Darrow for the defense: a biography 154:.’) There was no such consensus. To recap:- 2025:It is quickly enough partially reverted by 1994:'Back to school: Ben-Gurion for beginners,' 501:= 'If the one month ban is not accepted'), 3076:1947–1948 Civil War in Mandatory Palestine 2584:Settlers Force Desertion of Yanun Village, 1019:of the Constitution in a most vital part.' 462:Blade is making no response to T. Canens. 328:a week-long block would be the next step.' 4274:You want to get into the analysis of why 3264:was updated with a fact from the article 2561:Palestinians 'forced to abandon village,' 2179:History of the Jews in the Land of Israel 1024:Daniel Preston, Marlena C. DeLong (eds.) 705:Hmmm, very clever - using that device of 3986:It's all a motherlode of crap because:- 3958:, its government enacted the law of the 3503:unable to resolve or prevent this abuse. 2378:as RS. It is used on quite a few pages, 2020:paraphrase these remarks almost verbatim 1627:HighBeam would love to hear feedback at 1435:a place to park a small joke at the end. 1309:Ludwig Wittgenstein: the duty of genius, 1152:his 1915 English translation of the WW1 4503: 2084:This too refers to the clause I added: 1924:, from a wiki page I've never edited ( 1255:With sullen pupils focussed on a dream, 1184:von beiden Parteien strenge zu halten.' 1150:Brigadier-General John Hartman Morganin 1092:A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man 1037:'Of his will to do it, I have the most 931:.’ (Rev ed.Paris, 1811, tome 3, p.252). 507:a week long ban would be the next step. 3868:List of indigenous people - Israelites 3084:Iran and weapons of mass destruction ‎ 2253:2602:304:6F77:6E99:A97A:A327:B58E:72EB 2197:, and on not obtaining clarification, 1954:2602:304:6F77:6E99:A97A:A327:B58E:72EB 1942:2602:304:6F77:6E99:A97A:A327:B58E:72EB 1922:2602:304:6F77:6E99:A97A:A327:B58E:72EB 1854:I added the word ‘alleged’ to phrasing 1130:Longmans, Green, and co., 1903, p.227. 320:(note singular) a try here; let's see 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4465:You have broken several rules on the 3968:Universal Declaration of Human Rights 3478:no room to talk, European Christian. 3224:Hi. That's a great link, thanks pal. 2665:Hello According to policy one of the 1197:Bender-Moss, San Francisco 1918 has:- 352:) of sanctions, can only mean 24 hrs. 299:User:The Blade of the Northern Lights 191:User:The Blade of the Northern Lights 7: 3942:from their tribal lands. Subsequent 2193:I took the innuendo as a failure to 1636:When the 1-year period is up, check 683:. I point that out in the spirit of 3962:which anticipated the principle of 1602:To activate your account: 1) Go to 2513:L'Orient Mitjà en el punt de mira, 1180:'Jede getroffene Vereinbarung ist 333:I.e. if 24 hrs doesn't work, then 24: 2516:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 1194:Commentaries on the law of wills, 436:The format of the final comments 115:Israel-Palestine arbitration case 4188:My avatar in Knowledge (XXG) is 3390:Einstein: His Life And Universe, 3247: 2589:Foundation for Middle East Peace 2437:All of the recent editions (?)!! 2376:Foundation for Middle East Peace 1903:, without replying Shrike then 1349:Distinguished linguists use it. 1182:dem Sinne und dem Wortlaute nach 613:.2nd.ed.1989, vol.XIX,p.5 col.3) 29: 1291:'Harry Walters was a harsh and 1217:In literature, the same result 4009:. The POV strategy is obvious. 3862:12:33, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 3847:00:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 3816:13:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 3790:12:33, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 3773:12:03, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 3747:20:27, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 3718:20:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 3700:19:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 3674:16:35, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 3660:08:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 3603:05:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 3024:Operation Magic Carpet (Yemen) 1554:Yes, but only if you're good! 1539:Um, I guess I can edit again? 1377:Diversity in Pre-Exilic Hebrew 389:to get more eyes on something. 1: 3732:03:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 3588:09:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 3572:03:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC) 3558:13:56, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 3540:11:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 3526:11:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 3496:06:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 3452:04:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 1960:'s consensual edit, and then 1604:http://www.highbeam.com/prof1 1482:, understand it). Cheers pal. 1259:Stares on the stagnant stream 4510:Bachmann (2007, pp. 420–424) 4496:18:34, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 4479:18:21, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 4444:14:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 4423:16:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 4400:14:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 4363:14:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 4292:14:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 4216:14:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 4180:12:11, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 4161:14:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 4088:14:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 4045:14:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 3954:. Since the creation of the 3901:14:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC) 3883:11:07, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 3040:Roger Williams (theologian)‎ 2493:American University in Cairo 1871:something as a fact. Shrike 907:Travels in Persia 1673-1677, 728:afternoon drinks and . . .) 4106:. Secondly, the page lists 3207:Palestinian Archive project 2476:University of Chicago Press 2079:horrific amateurish writing 1901:a request for clarification 1247:wrote of Persephone in her 324:that doesn't work. If not, 4527: 4467:List of Indigenous Peoples 2546:International Crisis Group 2537:, Rebecca L. Stein, (eds.) 1229:, Garden City Pub. Co.1943 1158:Kriegsbrauch im Landkriege 767:Dictionary of Legal Usage, 529:'let's see if that works'. 3422:13:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 3403:13:00, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 3370:12:37, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 3345:16:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 3234:20:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 3219:16:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 3072:Abdul Rahman Hassan Azzam 3060:Murder of Shalhevet Pass‎ 2967:dont see why you bother. 2542:Stanford University Press 2419:. The edit summary runs:- 2314:20:06, 27 June 2012 (UTC) 2218:10:02, 20 June 2012 (UTC) 2171:19:38, 27 June 2012 (UTC) 2141:21:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC) 2114:15:11, 24 June 2012 (UTC) 1979:12:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC) 1821:14:50, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 1798:added a link pointing to 1774:added a link pointing to 1750:added a link pointing to 1726:added a link pointing to 1583:08:13, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 1564:06:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 1549:06:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 1356:The many hues of English, 1265:unequivocable battlements 1094:wrote warmly of Cardinal 957:moft unequivocable manner 856:The Surgeon of Crowthorne 193:concurs with T. Canens ( 4200:wrong in the first place 3607:So that's the beef? I'm 3322:and it will be added to 3191:02:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC) 3154:21:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 3020:Judaization of Jerusalem 2978:16:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2953:14:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2941:13:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2920:12:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2889:12:15, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2875:12:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2859:12:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2831:11:56, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2817:11:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2784:11:24, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2770:11:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2756:11:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2742:11:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2728:10:50, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2679:10:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2653:08:04, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2597:Admiral William J. Crowe 2405:18:02, 3 July 2012 (UTC) 2357:18:19, 1 July 2012 (UTC) 2329:, with the edit summary 2293:Judaization of Jerusalem 2271:User:No More Mr Nice Guy 2155:User:No More Mr Nice Guy 2027:User:No More Mr Nice Guy 1926:Murder of Shalhevet Pass 1873:admitted retrospectively 1761:Murder of Shalhevet Pass 1694:added links pointing to 1649:22:01, 21 May 2012 (UTC) 1528:12:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 1510:09:55, 16 May 2012 (UTC) 1492:09:29, 16 May 2012 (UTC) 1448:07:29, 16 May 2012 (UTC) 1423:18:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 1368:unequivocable adjectives 1312:Penguin Books 1991 p.401 1284:Doubleday, 1963 p.38 has 1282:Love, let me not hunger, 1208:.'(p.970); ‘if they are 999:Claude Gernade Bowers, 850:, recently described by 723:07:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 697:02:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC) 648:11:32, 14 May 2012 (UTC) 599:01:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC) 578:13:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC) 472:11:20, 13 May 2012 (UTC) 415:09:58, 13 May 2012 (UTC) 400:09:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC) 370:09:58, 13 May 2012 (UTC) 316:'I'm happy to give your 292:08:47, 13 May 2012 (UTC) 277:07:13, 13 May 2012 (UTC) 254:22:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 243:21:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 133:18:50, 12 May 2012 (UTC) 4204:re-framing the question 3938:, that had been mostly 3609:a burden to the project 3467:06 settembre 2012 07:21 3328:Did you know? talk page 3099:Nuclear program of Iran 2621:Josie Sandercock (ed.) 2077:, with an edit summary: 1891:on the talk page about 1629:WP:HighBeam/Experiences 1399:‘unequivocable results' 1379:J.C.B. Mohr , 1993 p.93 1321:unequivocable intention 1245:Edna St. Vincent Millay 1210:clear and unequivocable 1206:clear and unequivocable 1111:'they are indubitable, 1017:unequivocable violation 584:What's with "unequivoca 481:Just between you and me 108:arbitration enforcement 4462: 4335: 4276:User:PhiloofAlexandria 3016:Islam and antisemitism 2694: 2447: 2434: 2012: 1713:Islam and antisemitism 1404:No wonder people like 1372: 1346: 1325: 1297: 1238: 1214: 1175: 1143: 1117: 1081: 1062: 1043: 1021: 961: 933: 911: 776: 674: 505:(as my second option) 330: 186:I month I/P topic ban. 4461: 4312: 4248:on its coinage. Both 3296:nonviolent resistance 3240:DYK for Ali Abu Awwad 3087:Azzam Pasha quotation 2760:Ok one day is fine.-- 2716:Azzam Pasha quotation 2687: 2443: 2422: 2265:Izz ad-Din al-Qassam‎ 2234:Azzam Pasha quotation 2206:Wikiquette Assistance 2038:Izz ad-Din al-Qassam‎ 2016:Izz ad-Din al-Qassam‎ 1999: 1986:Izz ad-Din al-Qassam‎ 1882:Azzam Pasha quotation 1622:WP:HighBeam/Citations 1364: 1342: 1317: 1289: 1234: 1202: 1165: 1135: 1109: 1077: 1054: 1035: 1030:Greenwood Press, 2003 1013: 953: 925: 892: 848:William Chester Minor 772: 314: 42:of past discussions. 4108:contemporary peoples 3724:alf laylah wa laylah 3386:1929 Hebron massacre 3107:Haj Amin al-Husseini 3036:Izz ad-Din al-Qassam 2706:As for your edit at 1962:provided new sources 1809:opt-out instructions 1737:Izz ad-Din al-Qassam 1663:disambiguation pages 1370:"right" and "wrong.' 1293:unequivocable tyrant 1204:‘if the language is 1113:unequivocable tokens 889:’s famous travelogue 495:if that doesn't work 387:requests for comment 265:predicted unerringly 4316:the area of modern 4250:Philo of Alexandria 4065:, to push this POV. 3438:the details in the 3384:in the year of the 3177:the MFD, which was 3159:continue. There is 3131:Kafr Qasim massacre 3095:Palestinian refugee 2593:Zbigniew Brzezinski 2577:Paradigm Publishers 2555:Bradt Travel Guides 2424:'rv all the recent 1907:with the summary,' 1865:reverted my wording 1793:fix with Dab solver 1769:fix with Dab solver 1745:fix with Dab solver 1721:fix with Dab solver 1689:fix with Dab solver 1610:WP:HighBeam/Support 1514:Your kind offer on 1191:John E. Alexander, 1170:unequivocable words 1058:inequivocable proof 1039:unequivocable proof 624:The Daily Telegraph 532:'let's see if that 173:User:Stephan Schulz 18:User talk:Nishidani 4463: 4305:notion of Jews as 3966:, codified in the 2605:Road Map for Peace 2469:David Dean Shulman 2299:User: Plot Spoiler 2281:Ruby Tuesday ALMWR 2148:Ruby Tuesday ALMWR 2121:Ruby Tuesday ALMWR 1785:Muslim Brotherhood 1671:• Join us at the 1007:Alexander Hamilton 990:Alexander Hamilton 973:unequivocable mode 4266:User:Schaferstein 4126:cultural property 3964:international law 3950:created a global 3814: 3771: 3463:Indirectheng < 3334: 3333: 3321: 3135:Battle of Tel Hai 3127:Joseph Trumpeldor 3111:Donald B. Redford 2980: 2637:User:Al Ameer son 2489:Political Science 2428:as violations of 2384:Roadmap for peace 1956:, then reverted 1676: 1638:applications page 1430: 1406:Richard A. Posner 1386:Nautica Talmudica 1096:John Henry Newman 986:Federalist Papers 589: 430: 398: 252: 131: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4518: 4511: 4508: 4460: 4230:this second edit 4063:User:Evildoer187 3811: 3802: 3796: 3768: 3759: 3753: 3524: 3311: 3251: 3244: 3052:Price tag policy 3008:Eliyahu Bet-Zuri 2973: 2968: 2951: 2918: 2815: 2247:Al-Aqsa Intifada 2125:'editorializing' 2014:So I got to the 1918:Al-Aqsa Intifada 1836:Luke 19 Verse 27 1789:check to confirm 1765:check to confirm 1741:check to confirm 1717:check to confirm 1685:check to confirm 1666: 1428: 1401:re its location. 1359:Knopf 1967 p.103 984:, who wrote the 982:Founding Fathers 929:dans un sens uni 903:Sir John Chardin 852:Simon Winchester 583: 428: 397: 251: 184:User:Floquenbeam 130: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4526: 4525: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4509: 4505: 4458: 4456: 4246:ḥever hayehudim 4112:ancient peoples 3960:Right of return 3956:state of Israel 3870: 3809: 3800: 3766: 3757: 3515: 3435: 3432:WP:AE#Nishidani 3352: 3337:Graeme Bartlett 3294:'s doctrine of 3287:Encounter Point 3242: 3203: 3064:Second Intifada 3004:Yitzhak Shamir‎ 2971: 2946: 2913: 2810: 2663: 2499:Edward Robinson 2327:User:Brewcrewer 2276:User:Brewcrewer 2258:User:Eat memory 2071:User:Brewcrewer 1958:User:Eat memory 1950:User:Eat memory 1946:Second Intifada 1828: 1673:DPL WikiProject 1659: 1593: 1459:Ivan Denisovich 1263:That moats the 943:William Smellie 675:That came from 620:Basil Bernstein 566:Fernando Alonso 346:if not . . then 111: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4524: 4522: 4513: 4512: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4499: 4498: 4455: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4431: 4428: 4407: 4406: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4351:Gharbiyyalites 4310: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4272: 4269: 4258: 4257: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4196: 4193: 4183: 4182: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4145: 4137: 4134: 4120: 4119: 4093: 4092: 4091: 4090: 4067: 4066: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4011: 4010: 3992:(1) Replacing 3984: 3983: 3915: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3869: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3706:modus operandi 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3458: 3434: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3425: 3424: 3406: 3405: 3382:Chaim Weizmann 3377: 3376: 3351: 3350:Ego and Hubris 3348: 3332: 3331: 3252: 3241: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3202: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3161:no requirement 3142: 3138: 2992: 2988: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2847:build articles 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2772: 2704: 2695: 2662: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2580: 2567: 2558: 2550:Sarah Irving, 2548: 2531: 2522:Tanya Reinhart 2519: 2511:Belén Vicéns, 2509: 2496: 2480:Sean McMahon, 2478: 2460: 2457: 2454: 2451: 2448: 2441: 2438: 2435: 2420: 2408: 2407: 2368: 2367: 2360: 2359: 2344: 2339: 2338: 2317: 2316: 2289: 2288: 2278: 2273: 2261: 2260: 2255: 2243: 2242: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2221: 2220: 2174: 2173: 2144: 2143: 2129:editorializing 2102:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 2090: 2089: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 1998: 1997: 1982: 1981: 1933: 1932: 1913: 1912: 1877: 1876: 1845: 1844: 1827: 1824: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1658: 1655: 1653: 1642: 1641: 1634: 1631: 1625: 1617: 1606: 1600: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1516:Torta paradiso 1468:Torta paradiso 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1436: 1410:Antonin Scalia 1402: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1383:Daniel Sperber 1380: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1301: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1261: 1260: 1257: 1256: 1252: 1251: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1215: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1176: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1124:Alexander Bain 1107: 1106: 1105: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1033: 1032: 1031: 1011: 1010: 1009: 978: 977: 976: 951: 950: 949: 934: 922: 919: 912: 890: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 859: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790:dictionaries'. 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 770: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 668:which claims: 629:I.e. 'In 1980 627: 616: 615: 614: 555: 554: 539: 538: 537: 530: 510: 509: 491: 487: 486: 485: 484: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 451: 431: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 390: 374: 373: 372: 353: 342: 331: 312: 305: 302: 224: 223: 218: 217: 201: 200: 199: 198: 187: 180: 175:concurs with ( 169: 162:User:T. Canens 140: 139: 110: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4523: 4507: 4504: 4497: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4453: 4445: 4441: 4437: 4432: 4429: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4401: 4397: 4393: 4388: 4387: 4385: 4381: 4380:Modern Israel 4377: 4376:Modern Israel 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4364: 4360: 4356: 4352: 4348: 4345: 4344: 4337: 4336: 4334: 4332: 4329:and southern 4328: 4324: 4321: 4319: 4311: 4308: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4281: 4280:User:Josephus 4277: 4273: 4270: 4267: 4263: 4260: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4247: 4243: 4241: 4236: 4231: 4228:You are with 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4205: 4201: 4197: 4194: 4191: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4181: 4177: 4173: 4168: 4167: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4146: 4143: 4138: 4135: 4132: 4128: 4127: 4122: 4121: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4059: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4029: 4025: 4021: 4017: 4013: 4012: 4008: 4004: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3957: 3953: 3949: 3945: 3941: 3937: 3934:and southern 3933: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3920: 3916: 3913: 3912: 3908: 3907: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3889: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3867: 3863: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3817: 3813: 3812: 3805: 3804: 3803: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3770: 3769: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3649: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3569: 3565: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3541: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3522: 3518: 3513: 3511: 3509: 3507: 3505: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3497: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3479: 3475: 3465: 3462: 3461: 3459: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3440:AE discussion 3433: 3429: 3423: 3419: 3415: 3410: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3378: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3367: 3363: 3358: 3355: 3349: 3347: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3329: 3325: 3319: 3315: 3309: 3305: 3302: 3299: 3297: 3293: 3288: 3285: 3283: 3282: 3281:Ali Abu Awwad 3277: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268:Ali Abu Awwad 3263: 3262: 3261:Did you know? 3257: 3253: 3250: 3246: 3245: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3200: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3176: 3172: 3167: 3162: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2991:encyclopedia. 2989: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2979: 2975: 2974: 2954: 2950: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2814: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2725: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2696: 2693: 2692: 2691:WP:UP#POLEMIC 2686: 2685: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2661: 2660:WP:UP#POLEMIC 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2639:3 years ago ( 2638: 2634: 2633: 2627: 2624: 2620: 2619: 2617: 2616: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2585: 2581: 2578: 2575: 2571: 2568: 2565: 2562: 2559: 2556: 2553: 2549: 2547: 2543: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2530: 2527: 2523: 2520: 2517: 2514: 2510: 2507: 2504: 2500: 2497: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2483: 2479: 2477: 2474: 2470: 2467: 2466: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2455: 2453:I rewrote it: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2442: 2439: 2436: 2433: 2431: 2427: 2421: 2418: 2413: 2410: 2409: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2370: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2361: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2286: 2285:User:NoCal100 2282: 2279: 2277: 2274: 2272: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2259: 2256: 2254: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2241: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2175: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2153: 2149: 2146: 2145: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2082: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2065: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2034: 2032: 2028: 2023: 2021: 2017: 2011: 2009: 2004: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1983: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1968: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1931: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1825: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1801: 1797: 1796: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1783: 1782: 1777: 1773: 1772: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1759: 1758: 1753: 1749: 1748: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1729: 1728:Fascist Italy 1725: 1724: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1692: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1674: 1670: 1664: 1656: 1654: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1639: 1635: 1632: 1630: 1626: 1623: 1618: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1605: 1601: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1590: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1571: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1480:Kurt Vonnegut 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1460: 1455: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1434: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1384: 1381: 1378: 1374: 1373: 1371: 1369: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1352: 1348: 1347: 1345: 1341: 1336: 1335: 1330: 1327: 1326: 1324: 1322: 1316: 1311: 1310: 1305: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1296: 1294: 1288: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1246: 1243: 1240: 1239: 1237: 1233: 1228: 1225: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1207: 1201: 1196: 1195: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1171: 1164: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1142: 1140: 1139:unequivocable 1134: 1129: 1125: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1116: 1114: 1108: 1103: 1102: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1080: 1076: 1071: 1068:.John Ashton 1067: 1064: 1063: 1061: 1059: 1053: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1040: 1034: 1029: 1028: 1023: 1022: 1020: 1018: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1003: 998: 997: 995: 991: 987: 983: 979: 974: 970: 966: 963: 962: 960: 958: 952: 948: 944: 941: 938: 937: 935: 932: 930: 923: 920: 917: 913: 910: 908: 904: 900: 898: 897:unequivocable 891: 888: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 857: 853: 849: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 775: 771: 768: 764: 763: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 745: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 712: 711:Julius Caesar 708: 704: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 673: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 650: 649: 645: 641: 636: 635:unequivocably 632: 628: 625: 621: 617: 612: 608: 607:unequivocable 605: 604: 602: 601: 600: 596: 592: 587: 581: 580: 579: 575: 571: 567: 562: 561:unequivocably 557: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 535: 531: 528: 527: 524: 520: 516: 512: 511: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 489: 488: 482: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 469: 465: 452: 449: 448: 446: 445: 443: 442: 441: 439: 434: 416: 412: 408: 403: 402: 401: 396: 395:Seraphimblade 391: 388: 384: 383:third opinion 380: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 354: 351: 347: 343: 340: 339:week-long ban 336: 335:the next step 332: 329: 327: 323: 319: 313: 310: 306: 303: 300: 295: 294: 293: 289: 285: 280: 279: 278: 274: 270: 266: 262: 257: 256: 255: 250: 249:Seraphimblade 246: 245: 244: 240: 236: 231: 226: 225: 220: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 202: 196: 192: 188: 185: 181: 178: 174: 170: 167: 163: 159: 158: 157: 156: 155: 153: 149: 143: 137: 136: 135: 134: 129: 128:Seraphimblade 124: 120: 116: 109: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4506: 4464: 4384:Eretz Israel 4379: 4375: 4350: 4346: 4342: 4340: 4315: 4313: 4306: 4261: 4245: 4238: 4234: 4203: 4199: 4189: 4148: 4141: 4130: 4124: 4111: 4107: 4056: 4032: 4015: 4002: 3985: 3976:repatriation 3917: 3909: 3871: 3836: 3807: 3799: 3797: 3764: 3756: 3754: 3705: 3647: 3613:toe the line 3608: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3436: 3414:171.8.66.113 3389: 3362:171.8.66.113 3359: 3356: 3353: 3335: 3303: 3289: 3279: 3273: 3266: 3265: 3259: 3256:23 July 2012 3204: 3178: 3174: 3165: 3160: 2969: 2965: 2846: 2711: 2699: 2688: 2664: 2641:July 2, 2009 2622: 2609:Oslo Accords 2583: 2573: 2570:Anna Baltzer 2551: 2538: 2525: 2512: 2502: 2481: 2472: 2444: 2425: 2423: 2380:Oslo Accords 2318: 2290: 2262: 2244: 2231: 2159:WP:CONSENSUS 2091: 2083: 2078: 2069: 2062: 2054: 2035: 2024: 2013: 2006: 2002: 2000: 1889:made a query 1868: 1829: 1806: 1800:Counterpunch 1660: 1652: 1643: 1594: 1538: 1515: 1467: 1432: 1398: 1394: 1367: 1365: 1355: 1343: 1333: 1320: 1318: 1308: 1292: 1290: 1278:Paul Gallico 1273: 1264: 1249:Second April 1248: 1241: 1235: 1224:Irving Stone 1220: 1212:.' (p.1198). 1209: 1205: 1203: 1193: 1188: 1181: 1169: 1166: 1157: 1146: 1138: 1136: 1120: 1112: 1110: 1100: 1084: 1078: 1065: 1057: 1055: 1046: 1038: 1036: 1026: 1016: 1014: 1001: 994:James Monroe 972: 964: 956: 954: 939: 928: 926: 915: 906: 896: 893: 887:Jean Chardin 773: 766: 761: 670: 657: 653: 634: 606: 585: 560: 550: 546: 542: 533: 514: 506: 502: 498: 494: 480: 460: 435: 427: 357: 349: 345: 338: 334: 325: 321: 317: 315: 308: 260: 229: 213: 209: 205: 194: 176: 165: 151: 144: 141: 119:topic banned 112: 78: 43: 37: 4471:Evildoer187 4028:Arab tribes 4024:Arab people 3318:quick check 3290:, espouses 3276:Palestinian 3201:Hello Nish! 3119:Old Yishuv‎ 3103:Trita Parsi 2535:Joel Beinin 2374:challenges 2372:AnkhMorpork 2240:User:Shrike 2183:This revert 2152:Nonetheless 2098:WP:STALKING 2064:WP:COATRACK 1886:User:Shrike 1862:User:Shrike 1841:Iloveandrea 1776:Palestinian 1614:User:Ocaasi 1088:James Joyce 707:paraleipsis 662:paraleipsis 337:would be a 36:This is an 4307:indigenous 4116:Israelites 4104:Canaanites 4100:Israelites 4058:Israelites 3948:cataclysms 3919:Israelites 3839:JGGardiner 3648:Growing up 3550:EdJohnston 3444:EdJohnston 3430:Result of 3314:here's how 3301:satyagraha 3166:completing 2712:third time 2552:Palestine, 2473:Dark Hope, 2094:WP:TAGTEAM 2042:Ben-Gurion 1811:. Thanks, 1498:John Wayne 1476:vaginamite 1375:Ian Young 967:John Knox 672:Observer). 521:, but the 379:uninvolved 358:sprachfeld 318:suggestion 230:uninvolved 117:, you are 106:Notice of 98:Archive 20 90:Archive 16 85:Archive 15 79:Archive 14 73:Archive 13 68:Archive 12 60:Archive 10 4488:Nishidani 4415:Nishidani 4413:warriors? 4262:Of course 4240:Hasmonean 4172:Nishidani 4076:Israelian 4003:sometimes 3854:Nishidani 3782:Nishidani 3739:Nishidani 3692:Nishidani 3652:Nishidani 3580:Nishidani 3532:Nishidani 3488:Nishidani 3395:Nishidani 3278:activist 3274:... that 3226:Nishidani 3146:Nishidani 3115:Palestine 3048:Bethlehem 3032:Beit Jala 3012:West Bank 2933:Nishidani 2881:Nishidani 2851:Nishidani 2748:Nishidani 2720:Nishidani 2645:Nishidani 2485:Routledge 2397:Nishidani 2349:Nishidani 2306:Nishidani 2210:Nishidani 2163:Nishidani 2133:Nishidani 2106:Nishidani 1990:Tom Segev 1971:Nishidani 1965:violates 1856:, itself 1667:Read the 1612:, or ask 1575:Nishidani 1541:Nishidani 1502:Nishidani 1484:Nishidani 1415:Nishidani 1351:Mario Pei 1329:Hans Küng 1156:handbook 715:Nishidani 685:WP:ENGVAR 654:forgotten 640:Nishidani 570:Nishidani 515:next step 407:Nishidani 362:Nishidani 350:next step 269:Nishidani 235:Nishidani 126:imposed. 4254:Josephus 3998:Arabians 3994:Bedouins 3980:diaspora 3970:and the 3952:diaspora 3911:Arabians 3324:DYKSTATS 3183:Johnuniq 3056:Beit El‎ 2972:nableezy 2949:ZScarpia 2916:ZScarpia 2813:ZScarpia 2667:sections 2426:editions 1920:page by 1897:WP:Undue 1752:Intifada 1696:Road Map 1570:porridge 1556:Johnuniq 1520:Johnuniq 1464:Jim Beam 1440:Johnuniq 1304:Ray Monk 1267:of Hell. 744:Bushisms 689:Johnuniq 677:HighBeam 591:Johnuniq 523:apodosis 519:protasis 464:Johnuniq 284:Johnuniq 233:Regards. 214:could be 4454:Warning 4331:Lebanon 4235:imposed 4149:extinct 4072:Israeli 4018:at the 3936:Lebanon 3810:Morpork 3767:Morpork 3595:Cptnono 3564:Cptnono 3517:RolandR 3298:called 2491:at the 2430:WP:NPOV 2388:reverts 2343:notes.' 2335:My edit 2199:took it 2187:my edit 2177:(5) At 2046:Zionism 1967:WP:NPOV 1880:(2) At 1869:alleges 1848:(1) At 1813:DPL bot 1472:Sambuca 899:Sense;’ 534:doesn't 261:beliefs 39:archive 4436:Crock8 4392:Crock8 4355:Crock8 4323:Jordan 4318:Israel 4284:Crock8 4208:Crock8 4190:crock8 4153:Crock8 4131:theory 4080:Crock8 4037:Crock8 4016:looked 3944:exiles 3940:exiled 3928:Jordan 3924:Israel 3893:Crock8 3875:Crock8 3292:Gandhi 3171:WP:MFD 3123:Silwan 3068:Hebron 3000:Aqraba 2867:Shrike 2823:Shrike 2776:Shrike 2762:Shrike 2734:Shrike 2671:Shrike 2628:, 2004 2506:Murray 2412:Shrike 2347:added. 2321:Hebron 2195:WP:AGF 2096:, and 1909:WP:BRD 1646:Ocaasi 1160:(1902) 872:back). 631:Gdansk 499:If not 4327:Syria 4242:state 4170:page. 4020:Arabs 4007:Arabs 3996:with 3932:Syria 3466:: --> 3393:here. 3179:after 3175:after 3091:Shasu 3080:Susya 2996:Yanun 2928:Yanun 2708:Yanun 2626:Verso 2529:Verso 2463:WP:RS 2393:WP:RS 2365:Yanun 1893:WP:OR 1858:WP:OR 1573:then. 1429:TRUTH 1090:, in 611:O.E.D 547:if so 536:work' 438:at AE 210:block 206:topic 123:block 16:< 4492:talk 4475:talk 4440:talk 4419:talk 4396:talk 4359:talk 4341:you' 4288:talk 4278:and 4252:and 4212:talk 4176:talk 4157:talk 4142:from 4084:talk 4055:(2) 4041:talk 4033:Arab 3946:and 3897:talk 3879:talk 3858:talk 3843:talk 3801:Ankh 3786:talk 3758:Ankh 3743:talk 3728:talk 3714:talk 3710:asad 3696:talk 3670:talk 3666:asad 3656:talk 3599:talk 3584:talk 3568:talk 3554:talk 3536:talk 3521:talk 3492:talk 3448:talk 3418:talk 3399:talk 3366:talk 3341:talk 3230:talk 3215:talk 3211:asad 3187:talk 3150:talk 3044:Ofra 2937:talk 2885:talk 2871:talk 2855:talk 2827:talk 2780:talk 2766:talk 2752:talk 2738:talk 2724:talk 2675:talk 2649:talk 2607:and 2601:here 2595:and 2401:talk 2353:talk 2310:talk 2302:here 2214:talk 2202:here 2167:talk 2137:talk 2110:talk 2075:here 2044:and 2040:and 1975:talk 1938:here 1930:WP:V 1895:and 1817:talk 1702:and 1579:talk 1560:talk 1545:talk 1524:talk 1506:talk 1488:talk 1444:talk 1419:talk 1408:and 1274:1963 1242:1950 1221:1943 1189:1918 1147:1915 1121:1903 1085:1850 1066:1839 1047:1779 965:1785 940:1780 719:talk 693:talk 681:here 644:talk 595:talk 574:talk 551:then 503:then 468:talk 440:is: 411:talk 385:and 366:talk 344:The 326:then 288:talk 273:talk 239:talk 182:(3) 171:(2) 160:(1) 148:here 4347:you 4098:(3) 3254:On 3117:, ‎ 2947:← 2914:← 2811:← 2564:BBC 2363:At 2319:At 2291:At 2263:At 2245:At 2232:At 2204:to 2185:of 2104:). 2081:. 2008:led 1940:by 1704:PNA 1700:AFP 1669:FAQ 1500:.:) 1433:and 1353:, 1306:, 633:is 543:the 189:(4) 4494:) 4477:) 4442:) 4421:) 4398:) 4386:. 4361:) 4333:.' 4325:, 4290:) 4214:) 4178:) 4159:) 4086:) 4043:) 3930:, 3926:, 3899:) 3881:) 3860:) 3845:) 3788:) 3745:) 3730:) 3716:) 3698:) 3672:) 3658:) 3601:) 3586:) 3570:) 3556:) 3538:) 3494:) 3450:) 3420:) 3401:) 3368:) 3343:) 3316:, 3258:, 3232:) 3217:) 3189:) 3152:) 3129:, 3121:, 3113:, 3109:, 3105:, 3101:, 3097:, 3093:, 3089:, 3082:, 3078:, 3074:, 3070:, 3058:, 3054:, 3050:, 3046:, 3042:, 3038:, 3034:, 3030:, 3026:, 3022:, 3018:, 3014:, 3010:, 3002:, 2998:, 2976:- 2939:) 2887:) 2873:) 2857:) 2829:) 2782:) 2768:) 2754:) 2740:) 2726:) 2677:) 2651:) 2524:, 2501:, 2471:, 2403:) 2395:. 2382:, 2355:) 2312:) 2216:) 2181:. 2169:) 2139:) 2112:) 2057:.' 2048:. 2033:. 2022:. 1992:, 1977:) 1852:, 1819:) 1795:) 1791:| 1771:) 1767:| 1747:) 1743:| 1723:) 1719:| 1698:, 1691:) 1687:| 1581:) 1562:) 1547:) 1526:) 1508:) 1490:) 1446:) 1421:) 1331:, 1323:.' 1280:, 1276:. 1172:.' 1141:.' 1126:, 992:, 945:, 905:, 721:) 695:) 646:) 597:) 576:) 549:, 470:) 413:) 368:) 341:. 322:if 290:) 275:) 241:) 94:→ 64:← 4490:( 4473:( 4438:( 4417:( 4394:( 4357:( 4320:, 4286:( 4210:( 4174:( 4155:( 4082:( 4039:( 3982:. 3895:( 3877:( 3856:( 3841:( 3806:. 3784:( 3763:. 3741:( 3726:( 3712:( 3694:( 3668:( 3654:( 3597:( 3582:( 3566:( 3552:( 3534:( 3523:) 3519:( 3490:( 3446:( 3416:( 3397:( 3364:( 3339:( 3330:. 3320:) 3312:( 3304:? 3228:( 3213:( 3185:( 3148:( 3125:, 3066:, 3062:, 3006:, 2935:( 2883:( 2869:( 2853:( 2825:( 2778:( 2764:( 2750:( 2736:( 2722:( 2673:( 2647:( 2495:. 2399:( 2351:( 2308:( 2212:( 2165:( 2135:( 2108:( 1973:( 1969:. 1815:( 1787:( 1763:( 1739:( 1715:( 1683:( 1675:. 1624:. 1577:( 1558:( 1543:( 1522:( 1504:( 1486:( 1442:( 1417:( 924:‘ 901:( 746:. 717:( 691:( 660:( 642:( 593:( 586:b 572:( 479:( 466:( 409:( 364:( 309:s 286:( 271:( 237:( 195:a 179:) 177:a 166:a 164:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index