User talk:Nukes4Tots/Archive 1

2573:

designs took parallel courses. In that respect, they are related. But, this is already well spelled-out in the article. They were all German guns competing for the police and military market during the interwar years. They were all based on Browning's FN1910 style slide, and general layout but all three differed drastically in virtually every other respect from the location of the magazine release to the particular double-action mechanism they chose to avoid the Tomiska patents or the competing designs' patents. Modern spring-around-the-barrel designs are limited to the Sauer and PPK styles the Mauser having been discarded as largely inferior in key respects. Hope this helps. I understand what you are trying to say and my key point here is that it's already in the article. --

2342:

firearms over the years that it has never used. It provides them to friendly nations, insurgent groups, and sometimes just buys them to keep other people from buying them. Bottom line is that given the secrecy and myriad possibilities associated with arms and their use, the likelyhood that in some way, the pictures were staged is high enough to preclude verifiability. I can recall an instance where hundreds of replica AK-47s were 'issued' to women for a parade in Iraq or Lebanon... not sure which now. The thought, of course, was that they were arming their women. Nothing of the sort. Beyond all of this, it's not about the picture, it's about all pictures in general. I can photoshop a picture of Abraham Lincoln with a P90, does that mean I can count him as a user? --

3409:. He basically took four shots at me to get me banned and used the same 'evidence' four separate times in an attempt to blanket as many Admin's as possible to get the results he wanted. I believe that in light of his hounding, baiting, and badgering me as well as reporting me for the same thing four times, some leniency is due. I admit to using foul language and being kurt and deliberate in my conversations and agree not to speak with this editor again, however he is now badgering other editors on the same article as well as removing legitemate sources I added prior to my ban. I would like to approach that civilly and argue my case. Thank you. 983:

the people who use Knowledge (XXG) are probably not "perfect readers," and that our burden as editors is to reach out to more, rather than fewer, readers. Therefore, while it is true that the Maxim gun was invented by Hiram Maxim, is it not more true to state that it was invented by Hiram Stevens Maxim. If mention of his son, who also designed implements related to guns, is inappropriate on this page about the Maxim gun, you could simply have edited that part out and left the

1344:) you can look up a vast amount of legal and technical information and technical drawings regarding ammunition and firearms in English, French or German. Under "Tables" you find, amongst other data, Pmax data for almost every commercially produced cartridge. In C.I.P. member states (like the UK) this data is used as the only applicable legal standard. C.I.P. uses the metric system to express quantities. For pressure you have to know 10 bar = 1 MPa, so 3250 bar = 325.00 MPa. 1952:

told you why your edits were being reverted. So, you came in here, sire, and proceeded to cite pictures of the same weapon I'd said... the MINIMI! I'm sorry if you were not thorough enough, your holiness, to actually read the edit comments before you jumped over here to prove me right. Then you lecture me about my tone. I deeply and sincerely apologize for any real or perceived slight that my grammar might have burdened you with. Merry Christmas to you and yours. --

2821:

moron. I use the phrase, "fool's errand" and he says I'm calling him a fool. Not needing to be a judge here, but if he's that thin skinned, maybe he should stay away from the internet. That off my chest, I will intentionally avoid words and phrases that anybody without a firm grasp of the English language might misinterpret as a personal attack or incivility. Of course, this is WAY outside my nature but as long as we all feel good about it, Jesus won't cry, eh?

1517: 3491:] is because, yes, the source is about recoil, but it has nothing to do with glocks. that source would be more appropriate for an article about recoil. it would be like if someone added in the article about barack obama that he played point guard during his high school basketball career, but the source provided was just about what point guards do, not about barack obama playing point guard. the source wouldn't be directly relevant to the claim 31: 964:

under the FN 1910 and the two are completely unrelated. Your dubious edits are unreferenced. Please be more careful in the future and consider not making edits unless you have a reference. What does this have to do with the stock market? How did I make you feel that I didn't think you were operating in good faith? I've assumed good faith and I Was giving you constructive advice. Please assume good faith from me as well. --

3222: 1582:? Plus, what I did was adding a simple video clip into the article even if it was after you guys had insisted on that a "30 round clip" isn't the same as a "30 round magazine". Tell me now, what is your good reason for removing that video clip after I had made the appropriate changes to it per "community standard"? I'd love to hear about it. And if you can't provide a convincing reason, I will add it back per 3555:

distinct feeling that this is not about the content or the references, but I don't have a crystal ball. If you don't like the three references provided, report them to reliable sources... you already know how to do that. In the meantime, the references stay. Any further threatening posts you make on my talk page will be reverted, unread. Take this up on the talk page for the Glock... out in the open. --

3308: 490: 2036:

on the talk page and a concensus is reached. This is a community and you're trying to bully your your content. Moreover, it's my responsibility to put the 3RR template there, not an admin's. Finally, you are being awful abrasive about this when you aren't following guidelines on how the editing process should run. Understanding all of that, please plead your case on the talk page. --

1380:

the US or Canada, I'm hard-pressed to accept the euro-centric body just because their data is easilly accessed. Further, the figures you listed were significantly different from those listed in the source I referenced. It's not that I mind so much, however if we're going to agree on one source, it needs to be discussed thoroughly under the firearms project, not on my talk page. --

791:

caseless and telescoped plastic case research in the US. Instead of a simple rising chamber, they're using a pivoting chamber. Simpler and more robust, I guess. The forward ejection tunnel is used on the FN-2000 and Kel-Tec .308 rifle (RBF?). A serious article on the subject might be of passing interest to some. Too bad the current articles are tainted. --

318: 2959:. second, it is not wikihounding to undo unsourced additions. "Proper use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing errors or violations of Knowledge (XXG) policy or correcting related problems on multiple articles." and i have not followed you to multiple articles. i've only removed your unsourced additions and original research from 420:"You do not need a (non free) photo of Malcolm X in an article about a gun." This statement strikes me as a pejorative statement about guns. The image is of the firearm! How much more gunlike do you need an image to be? Nobody is addressing my primary argument, that whether or not it's appropriate is a matter of opinion. -- 2357:

fair with you and we both okay let's assume it a half proof, and we still need a written one. So we keep it in the list, put a next to it so that readers and users can notice that this requires verification and more people will be working on finding a resource, which makes finding one easier and more possible. Regards --

3013:, you'd see "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." since i've challenged your addition, the burden lies with you. it's blatant 2705:

I agree, there were some strong words in there (carefully chosen to avoid a direct personal attack) and, yes, I might have been baiting. But I feel the reasonable reader would interpret it as a tongue-in-cheek attempt, poorly placed and in somewhat bad taste given the way the one editor took it. My bad. --

3204:

The dispute ended in the separate thread on AN:I as I stated in my response to this "do-over" report. I don't know what needs to be solved as it's already been solved. He re-reported it despite the resolution which I complied with. No need to make any offers or anything. What happens the next time,

3054:

i'm not trying to hound you. i am trying to avoid an edit war by discussing with you the unsourced edit you have restored, still unsourced, and the inherent burden you have to provide a source or stop edit warring. i think we need admin intervention, because if you think i'm hounding you, and i think

2704:

Tone is often lost in the written word. No problem, I would have probably done the same. This guy was being tedious but he made the right point so I agreed with him, added a reference that supported his, and even went so far as to write a sincere apology. Heck, that didn't work, so I tried sarcasm.

2572:

Well, inasmuch as they are the same class, yes, however the article originally read that the SIG P230 and P232 owe their lineage to an earlier gun. Somebody mistakenly believed that earlier gun was the Walther PP being that's the gun the article was about. In reality, the Walther, Sauer, and Mauser

2035:

Okay, I'll assume good faith. Good faith implies that you didn't know about the 3RR, otherwise you would not have been edit warring. Further, I'll assume now that you don't know the procedure for editing. Add content. If the content is disputed, said content should be removed until it's discussed

1733:

I reverted the edit you made in the P-51 article about when the plane was retired. While it was retired by the USAF in 1957, it served on until 1984 with the Dominican Air Force. It also was to involved in combat with that plane in 1965 and was also used in the 1969 Football War. The P-51 served with

1603:

You've GOT to be kidding me? I'm treating you like a novice because you're ACTING like a novice and engaging in an edit war about which you seem to display little knowledge. Discuss it on the talk page and please, avoid posting condescending messages on others talk pages. Your juvenile response is

1363:

If you are aware where SAAMI publishes its data on the internet that information would be great for Knowledge (XXG). As long as SAAMI data can not be directly accessed from the SAAMI website itself, I personally tend to question SAAMI data cited somewhat, since the cited SAAMI data on Knowledge (XXG)

1347:

Please note that the C.I.P. technical drawings are copyrighted, so please do not copy and paste them into Knowledge (XXG). Since the 9 mm Luger (its official C.I.P. nomenclature) is a German cartridge (Germany is a C.I.P. member state), I think the C.I.P. Pmax can be regarded as an appropriate source

982:

If you find mention of the Maxim Silencer inappropriate in connection with mention of Hiram Percy Maxim on the Maxim gun page associated with Hiram Stevens Maxim, it is because you know about one hundred times more about guns and related things than most readers. Don't you think that the majority of

809:

From what I understand, (and this may be some idiot spouting off, for all I know), the guy was discharged from some cadet school in the UK, and barred enlistment into the British Army on psychological grounds. It is too bad that the articles he's created are tainted to a degree. Some day, it might be

2663:

Funny, I thought it was prose, not incivility. Meltdown... I was demonstrating a meltdown. At least somebody understood the vague social reference. Anywho, it was neither a personal attack nor uncivil. As for being a dick, in the eye of the beholder. Uncalled for? Matter of opinion. I think it's

1379:

I'll have to say that SAAMI is the only one of the two that I've heard quoted with any regularity. Further, it's an American association and... hate to say it, but The American sporting market is bigger than the rest of the world markets combined. Since about 90% of the world reloading market is in

1359:

although operating differently. SAAMI is a manufacturer's association. In contrast to C.I.P.’s decisions the recommendations of SAAMI have not the force of law. These two main ammunition standards organisations are cooperating in an effort to unify their rules, though there are still hard at work to

963:

Wow, nt entirely sure how to read your edits. I reverted your edits because they were inappropriate, not because I intended to personally insult you. You added a statement about the Maxim Silencer under the Maxim Gun's introduction. Inappropriate. You added information about the US Firearms Corp

849:

Well, where's there's smoke, there's fire. Your instincts are probably good on that puppet as well. He's been denied already enough times he's likely learning how to cover his tracks. I did a search for some of the prototypes he's interested in and noted that most of the posts on military images.com

790:

Odd. Poor kid probably has some significant psychological disorder. Tedious. It's a shame. The TKB-022 was an intriguing series of prototypes. They pioneered the rising chamber and forward ejection tube. The rising chamber was duplicated (partially) by the Steyr ACR. It's now a key feature in

291:

he keeps quoting is, "Significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." That's a matter of concensus opinion in this case, as I've made clear in the talk page and

3554:

Sir or Ma'am, I've already been punished for my perceived actions, I am not going to continue this conversation here. The fact is this is my edit and my reference. You didn't like my edit so you reverted it. Now there are three references on that page and you're questioning every one. I get the

3526:

on one hand, you say that you want to discuss this civilly. but on the other hand, my good faith attempts to discuss anything with you is hounding. that doesn't make sense. also, threatening to go back to edit warring while you're still blocked for that is not a good start. and finally, i think you

3506:

I'm putting it back. It is about compensation in general. I don't require a separate reference for each cartridge article saying that, "The .300 H&H Magnum is a cartridge designed to fire a bullet." It is known that a cartridge fires a bullet. If you're going to ask for a reference, ask for

2794:

In terms of discussion - I strongly urge both you and Serialcomma to stop poking each other and launching personal attacks. I believe that both of you have done both on the talk page over the last week. I don't want to pick someone to single out as worse or the person who started it - it needs to

2417:

I have no problem with fact tagging it now. Not looking at the pictures, you might want to list the links on the talk page and solicit a verifiable reference. Understand how others have ruined it for everybody by adding every country to every firearm without a lick of evidence. I make it a habit

2356:

I gave you two photos, but I can give you tens, with different places and situations, i would be stupid to photoshop them all and it will be really not realistic to think that they staged them all. My suggestion is to keep Lebanon, however request citation, because we have a strong proof, but to be

2068:

there. So, I don't see any problem with the information I have added and why it could ever be a matter of dispute. And, I'm sorry, but your initial reason for reverting my edit "The article needs some serious balance out of respect for the victims and history." sounds to me like "I feel offended by

1417:

I'd go further. I think that if we're sourcing CIP data and the rest of the shooting press is sourcing SAAMI data (and they are) then our data is going to look 'funny' and lack credibility. Why should a European body dictate what pressures we use here on Knowledge (XXG)? I really don't think that

1089:

No, I read this first. They are making a M1911 clone and using the designation M1910. There are hundreds of things called the M1910, but this one happens to be unrelated to the FN Model 1910. A simple glance at the picture would suffice. Reading the text, however, reveals that it's related to the

468:

The photo was signifigant BECAUSE of the firearm, not merely because of Malcolm X. Your necktie analogy is absurd. That it was significant TO the gun was clearly stated on numerous entries by myself and others as well as edit comments and the talk page for the photo itself. Instead of discussing

3531:

your source only talks about compensation in general, not a glock's perceived compensation. the fact is, the source you're attempting to edit war to include has nothing to do with glocks specifically. you could try adding it to an article about compensation, maybe. but the source is just a company

2917:

I'm not sure if your recent edits to the "Users" list on the Glock page are appropriate. The list is not meant to be just a series of flags and model types. You've removed important dates and other vital information. The list should be as comprehensive as possible, within reason of course (I agree

2832:

Your agreement to avoid doing so in the future is most appreciated. This would have been much less of a problem if he wasn't thin-skinned, but he is what he is, and the situation needs to calm down now. I appreciate that you understand what he's responding to and will try and avoid doing more of

2534:

You're asking me to defend one part of the article that's erroneous and citing another part that's also erroneous. The Walther PPK came about AFTER the Sauer 38H, the pistol on which the SIG P230 and P232 owe their parentage. In fact, all of the above mentioned pistols owe their existence to two

2160:

You have removed Lebanon from the list though it was already there for ages, and what I did was only to clarify what forces use it. And you are asking for a source, well I can't provide materials as sources other than photos from the military parade and from various event; however, it is common on

1951:

Considering you addressed me with the salutation, "Hey", I was assuming that's how you wanted to keep the discourse. Whatever, your highness, I'm easy. At any rate, your worshipfulness, if you'd kindly read my edit comments as you should have done in the first place, you'll see that I had already

1267:

copy of the AKM, it's a straightforward copy of the Soviet AKM, he has not even bothered arguing his point and accused me of vandalism, which indicates he is there to troll or doing it out of blind nationalism (he claims to be Egyptian). I would appreciate if you could weigh in your opinion on the

3009:(perceived? according to whom?). for the record, whatever unsourced and original research you've added to this article could have been added by anyone else, and i'd react the same way, because i am editing the article to make it better. your accusations are not helping anything. if you would read 2341:

There is no offense meant. I'm convinced, but my being convinced does not meet Knowledge (XXG) standards. Here's a thought, just leave it off the list until a verifiable source can be found that 'says' that Lebanon has purchased the and operates it. The United States has made HUGE purchases of

2092:

You've been warned and you're refusing to discuss it on the talk page, preferring to edit war. You're violating civility, assuming good faith, undue weight, and probably a few more that you're in danger of violating. All you can say is that you've 'figured out my motives'. Good luck with that.

2055:

article, meaning that little biography about the perpetrator, is nothing unusual. So why should I ask for permission to include this information, if similar articles also contain biographies about the perpetrators? Sorry, but where's the reasoning here. It's not that I have committed the crime of

761:

Yeah, you could say that I've had a run in or two with out mutual friend. There's been probably a dozen more that have popped up that aren't listed on either of the checkusers, mostly variations on my username or real name. Thankfully, the off-wiki harassment has mostly stopped by now, and he now

650:

Since I've blocked you, a lot has been happening on that article. Lots of reverting by lots of people. I dont think it is fair to leave only you blocked at this point, so I'd be willing to unblock you assuming that you agree to not edit war any further (on that page, or any other). There is no

226:

I appreciate your opinion, but it's just that. This is, in fact, a matter of opinion. You don't decree that you are right, it's a community decision. This, being a concensus addition, should not be arbitrarily removed. If you weren't part of the concensus, check the talk page, edit histories,

3017:

until proven otherwise with a reliable source. and i am not interested in edit warring with you even though you are clearly wrong. so maybe you could take a breather, have a mentos, and remove it yourself after you read the applicable policies. and calling me, or anyone, a retard is just a gross

2820:

We're on two different pages with the incivility and personal attacks. The other user is crying NPA left and right, but he's also interpreting what I say wrong. I quote Arlo Guthrie and he says I'm threatening to kill him. I use the words "fucking moron" and he says I am CALLING him a fucking

770:

turned up as unrelated, as it is a name used frequently by Jetwave, and the edits follow the same pattern, especially the fascination with the Korobov prototypes. Some of the photos he's uploaded are the exact same photos Jetwave loves to post in the various weapons forums. I can only hope, in a

3188:

conciliatory in that AN3 report, it might be closed with no action. If there is not the slightest initiative coming from you to reach an amicable settlement, I don't see a good result. The article has been full-protected once; I think the next step is going to be blocks for somebody. Make us an

2798:

If you can continue discussing without being rude or confrontational with him feel free to do so. If you do so and he continues to be rude and confrontational he'll be held accountable for that. If you both take a cooling off period and re-engage later in a more constructive manner that works

827:

Thanks for the heads up. This guy sure does love to stalk people and post their personal information, thankfully I chose to only use this user name on wikis, so he couldn't track me down to anywhere else. I can't believe that DroneZone was unrelated, I am positive that it's jetwave, their edit

2118:

Hmm, ok, yes, it needs referencing, cant' argue with that. :) Unfortunately, the references I'm finding are from forums rather than from Ruger. Would those be acceptable? I also agree it needs to be integrated into the text better, but I'm not sure where...any ideas? Gotta disagree about it's

2978:

Go away. You're editing the article to hound me. Back the fuck off. Any retard understands the concept of recoil. I only need to cite information that is likely to be disputed. I don't need to cite each and every fucking word. And no matter how much you're protesting, you've nit-picked

935:

I noticed your comment on reverting my edit. That will help condition me for more face slaps by the stock market. If you were to accord the benefit of the doubt that I had made the edit in good faith, you would not have removed the text which disambiguates one Hiram Maxim from the other.

469:

this, you banned me? While you may disagree, that is your OPINION. You're interpreting your opinion about its significance rather than the actual rule to block me. I'm expressing my opinion and defending a prior concensus on the matter. Hardly fair... but of course, that's my OPINION. --

2418:

to revert dubious entries, most of which are passing edits by folks who play a little too many video games. The P90 is especially vulnerable, for one, and Lebanon has a history of being added to every firearm out there. Nothing personal, just trying to stem the flood of misinformation. --

2828:

When the discussion started, your ignorance of how he'd respond was understandable and acceptable. Now that you know how he's responding, continuing the way you had started out would be poking him with a stick, which is considered out of bounds even if the pokes are individually within

2514:

You just reverted my edit to the Walther PP page, saying the SIG P230 is "completely different save from the fact it's a pistol." I would ask you to explain/verify that. It says right in the article "but the refined SIG P230 and the P232, owe much to the Walther PPK." How are SIG P230's

1706:

page. I'm trying to make some copyedits to that article and meeting significant opposition of a personal, rather than constructive, nature; as you've worked with the editor most opposed to my changes before, is there any chance you could weigh in on what I've proposed? The thread is at

2227:

I'm not saying it's not legitemate. If you listed the USA as a user without a reference, that's a reason to keep it with just a fact tag. But Lebanon has a history of being added to each and every firearm article because somebody's cousin in Beiruit bought one on the black market.

1626:: "Template warnings are very generic, and sometimes out of date. Sometimes a template says never to do something which is nevertheless allowed in certain circumstances. Sometimes Knowledge (XXG) has multiple rules which are contradictory. If a rules violation is not clear-cut, an 1650:

Okay, stop overquoting WP guidelines. In this case, the template was spot-on and you were violating it by goading an edit war. I noticed that although your comments clearly supported your view that You and God were right, you did not yet make that fourth edit. Interesting.

651:

reason you cannot discuss civilly, without reverting the edits until a decision is made. Its your call. If you agree to stop edit warring, just request unblock again, noting so. (Also note that the page is going to be protected to prevent anybody else from edit warring) -

292:

on edit summaries. So, unless you're an admin and you've decided to arbitrate this... uh... you're wrong too. As for being a racist, I made my case for that his actions were racist clear enough, so I doubt you've read that case at all. Please don't go off half-cocked. --

145:

Indeed. Currently the user in question has been blocked. Feel free to remove the above comments from your talk page, if they make you uncomfortable. Looks like you handled yourself well. I'd be interested in hearing about it, if you have any further problems with this. –

2847:

for future reference, so we know how to gauge certain users' 'thin skin,' some might consider the implication that they "misinterpret" you because they don't have a "firm grasp of the english language" to be insulting, and therefore another personal attack. just an fyi

1135:

named "knaack". Unfortunately that ref name is not defined in that article, causing an error message in the reference list at the bottom. Nor does it appear to be in the edit history such that I could resurrect it for you. Can you provide the complete citation?

1398:

I agree with Nukes. And if we're going to start using CIP data in the absence of SAAMI data, it should be explicitly sourced as such or else it will be both misleading and confusing to the many knowledgeable people who are generally familiar with SAAMI

2553:

I'm not longer defending the fact that the SIG P230 came from the Walther PPK. I'm just saying they're related, so it has a place in the See Also section. If both the PPK and the P230 were developed in parallel from the same base, aren't they related?

2289:

Pictures are not verification. I've got pictures of me shooting an Austyer. Does that mean that the US Military uses the Austeyr? No. I've also carried the British SA80 on active duty while training with the Brits. Pictures are not good enough.

2119:

usefulness. Twist rate is crucial for accuracy (though I'm well aware of the criticisms involving the mini's accuracy :) ) and is useful for both reloaders and shooters buying factory manufactured ammo. Any suggestions you may have are appreciated.

2014:

I basically told you above why I did not add the content at the murderer's, but at the massacre's article. And so far you've not provided any reason, why my addition is disputed. So, I ask you again, what's your problem with the information I have

3511:

page, not on each and every individual page requiring that the reference points out that the .300 H&H Magnum fires a bullet. Who knows, maybe the .244 Remington does not fire a bullet. Your logic is flawed and you are STILL hounding me.

1996:. And it's not that the article is that long already so a little bit more content wouldn't hurt. BTW you didn't provide any reason for reverting my edit besides your perceived balancing problems. And exactly what is disputet in my addition? 1173:

That's clear in the article on Garand himself. I'm a Rush fan myslef and love Canada, but I don't think it's appropriate as Garand immigrated when he was very young and wasn't known to identify himself as either Canadian or Canadian Born.

1360:

solve differences between their rules. These differences consist of varying chamber dimensions and maximum allowed chamber pressures. There are also technical variations in the way chamber pressures are measured giving different results.

850:

about these guns are from shadowy characters (probably the same guy) that end up getting banned for similar reasons as he got banned here. It seems that ALL of his firearms information is sourced from the Tula museum. Again, odd. --

579:" (he underlined it). This admin clearly will not allow any argument for the inclusion of the photo because he is prejudiced against its use in an article about a gun. This statement was the reason for my block, not any WP policy. 1542:

The last guy to make an edit put both types of rifles in the info box. That seems fine by me, and I'm willing to drop a subject as silly as what we should label the M1 Garand on Knowledge (XXG)! I hope we can put this behind us.

1821:

This is spot on why kids should be allowed to carry them. You never know when an outlaw might waylay your kid with a nuke on the way home from school or a long Saturday afternoon of playing video games. It's for the children.

2304:

These are photos from the military parade for god's sake, the flags of Lebanon are all over, the badge on the shoulder of the republican guard soldiers is so clear, you can see the badge on the Lebanese Army official website

1030:

This company you refer to owns the Maxim name, all rights to manufacture under it, has a large archive of its materials, produces this product, and therefore can hardly be considered to be tangential to the thing itself.

3123:

Your premise reminds me of a story, probably fromn Alan King, about sophisticated toys he ran into while holiday-shopping for his kids. One was a Nuclear War toy. It was subtitled, "Be the first on your block to be the

3205:

though, Ed? This, what, three or four issues in, what, a week or so? I've edited this article for how long and he jumps in and takes issue with everything I have to say? Wikihounding... clear cut case. --

1987:

I'd assume that the person in question does not merit his own article, which means that the information should be provided within the article about the massacre, which is also nothing special if you look

987:

name intact. Just because you can easily revert with one click doesn't mean you always need to pull that trigger. How about if we add a footnote to this first paragraph pointing out that he had a son,

3268:*Any* conciliatory gesture could have averted this result. We expect our editors to be grownups, and we shouldn't have to advise you every step of the way, to rescue you from intractable quarrels. See 1604:

telling. It's awful brazen of you to go against the community and violate the 3RR. I feel like you're either trolling or just enjoy being a dick. Either way, the outcome can't help your position. --

2115:"removed poorly placed information. First, it needs to be referenced. Second, it needs to be integrated into the text. This quasi-table is information that is useful to maybe 1 in 1000 people)" 1010:

It's an inappropriate edit, I reverted it. It's incumbant on you to get it right. If it was a simple correction, I'd have made it. You and I must disagree that it's the least bit relevant. --

1233:, another Jetwave sock aimed at harassing you. I reverted his edits to your Commons user and talk pages, but it's likely he'll continue socking on Commons, so you'll want to keep an eye out. 2019:

And no, I don't think you were nice, by simply ignoring my proposal to discuss this matter at the Talk-page, reverting my edit without giving any reason and slapping that 3RR-batch onto me.(

771:

gallows humor sort of way, that he's moved on from me and latched himself on to you :) But seriously, if and when more of his socks pop up, I'll be more than happy to block on site. Oh, and

1268:

talk page. He also seems to be inserting Egypt as a user for many other modern Western weapon types (UMP, Minimi) without providing any sort of references, keep an eye out on him. Cheers.

2069:

this, so shove it up your ass!" So, reverting my edit multiple times, plus the 3RR-template looked to me, as if you were desperately trying to get rid of information that you found to be

1753:

Why is the height parameter not suitable for rifles? It's used in both official marketing material among the big manufacturers, why is it less suitable on the AUG than it is on the MP7?

3532:

trying to sell a product, so it probably wouldn't work there either. maybe the source could be use in an article about companies that makes compensation modifications? that could work.

874:). I believe it was abruptly ended the last time, and that the lack of "consensus" was based on false observations and inaccurate understandings, as much as legitimate points. -- 287:

2 states, "A rose, cropped from a record album, to illustrate an article on roses." That does no apply here as this was a historical event that cannot be reproduced. Further, the

2802:

It's hard not to have some chilling effect on legitimate discussion when you leave warnings like this, but the situation had degenerated enough that it needed to end. Thanks.

1159:

born here (I didn't till not so long ago, & most sources I've seen (few as they are, admittedly} don't mention it), would you have a problem with it being "Canadian-born"?

735: 227:

etc. The community seems to be for its inclusion on the page, though I understand you are not. Please take this to the M1 talk page as I doubt people will be reading this. --

828:

histories are almost exactly the same with the exception of jetwave's obsession with trans-gendered british military personnel. I think he got around the checksum somehow. —

916:. I think we all need to lay out sources first, where everyone can see them, and then work on a compromise that is well referenced and takes all sources into account. 672:

Hi. I'd appreciate if you didn't remove the images from the article. Other articles have images that don't include the subject but are relevant to the article, such as

3393:

This issue had already been resolved. The reporting user reported me to 3rr despite having already reported the incident TWICE on AN/I. Here are his previous reports:

2161:

Knowledge (XXG) not to accept these photos are a source. So I suggest you keep Lebanon and simply put next to it until someone find a written text mentioning that. --

1485:. When someone makes a mistake, you explain it, not be a fucking jackass about it. Maybe you should clean up your "shit" before you accuse everyone else of adding it. 775:

is aware of the Jetwave situation, and I've been taking socks one or two at a time to him to checkuser for a while now. I'm sure he'll work with you as well. Regards,

1530: 2979:

everything I've done on Glock since you got your panties in an uproar over something. Not sure what your problem is with me, but it's really fucking stupid. --

3463:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

623:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

594:

is clear enough. You were warned about it but chose to disregard the warning as a "threat". If you ignore warnings, you have to accept the consequences. —

3138:

That reminds me of a line in the movie "Full Metal Jacket". Something to the tune of, "I want to be the first kid on my block with a confirmed kill." --

3289:

Well, thank goodness I didn't make any insincere conciliatory gestures. Averted this result? What result? That I fought back when getting hounded? --

1788:

I too think every kid should be allowed to carry her own thermonuclear sidearm. Cheers for all you're doing to make the world a happier, safer place :)

2646:

Walk right in, its around the back, about a half a mile from the railroad track (or was it a quarter mile? Dang, now I'm gonna have to go look it up)

1579: 3348: 2309:! it is not a single soldier taking a photo, it is a whole company marching during the military parade on Lebanon's independence day. Thank you -- 530: 3176:

Hello Nukes4Tots. I'm probably not the first admin to be seriously tempted to block you for personal attacks. There is currently a case open at

1090:

Colt M1910, not the FN 1910. This is basic, simple stuff. Please, again, READ what you're referencing and learn something prior to posting. --

635:, where several administrators (4 if I counted correctly, including myself), amongst others, point out the relevant policies and guidelines. - 3448: 608: 1989: 348:}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see 93:

Yes, I've read through his history. Looks like he's just a nutcase with a long history of sock puppetry starting (maybe) with a user named

1486: 1065: 2963:, which is what any editor is supposed to do. 'perceived' recoil is unencyclopedic, unsourced, original research, until proven otherwise. 575:

Blocking admin has expressed an opinion about an interpretation of a WP policy that does not address the policy. Specifically, he stated "

1768:

I'll have to disagree. Though I have seen Height listed, it is a useless measurement. It adds nothing to the article, in my opinion. --

719: 694: 387:

Editors may still be blocked even if they have made three or fewer reverts in a 24 hour period, if their behavior is clearly disruptive

2471: 2061: 1670: 261:. If you have an issue with our polices, bring them up on the appropriate talk page. Stop reverting people for enforcing them. - 2600:

It doesn't work. This is a formal warning. You will be blocked next time. I hate to drop a bunch of links on you, but please heed

3343: 525: 1482: 2444: 2393: 2369: 2321: 2268: 2210: 2176: 1155:

I notice you reverted Garand described as "Canadian". Since I imagine many Canadians, even firearms enthusiasts, don't know he

3181: 3170: 2432:

Alright then, I will readd Lebanon and fact tag it. I will also link the photos on the talk page and ask for text reference --

948:, inventor of the Maxim Silencer. My research did not uncover why this is not a useful clarification. What does yours show? 2838: 2807: 2760: 191:? Does the article talk about Malcolm X at all? No. Even if it did, it would have to discuss the photo itself, as is done in 66: 3254: 1980: 992:, who is credited with the Maxim Silencer. Doesn't that seem like a more encyclopedic option than just deleting everthing? 438:

No, the image is of Malcolm X; he just happens to be holding a gun. Should we include that same photo in the article about

349: 3398: 3055:

you're just adding unsourced content so i want to revert/discuss, and you're calling me a retard, then we have a problem.

2664:

odd that, though no personal attack or incident occurred, it was still reported as such. Talk about not being a dick. --

2056:

doing something new and original. It has been done before by others and there were never any complaints. And further the

1040: 94: 3321: 3238: 3229: 503: 325: 1867: 1318: 3315: 2535:

unmentioned pistols, the FN 1910 and Little Tom pistols. They are both derivative and both developed in parallel. --

497: 3431:

It's a 24 hour block (as per your previous blocks, 48 would have been reasonable) which will expire soon. Wait. —

763: 3320:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

3269: 2195:

I only have a reference for the country as a whole (as Lebanon) not the security branches that use it in Lebanon --

502:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

38: 2834: 2803: 2756: 871: 3246: 3537: 3496: 3394: 3362: 3088: 3060: 3023: 2968: 2853: 2631: 1490: 1369: 1199: 544: 75: 1046:

Well, then verify it. But, the FN 1910 is completely unrelated as is the Maxim Silencer to the Maxim Gun. --

112:

Hey there, N4T. I've removed this little...nugget. It's in the history if you want to link to it in future.

2482: 2475: 1993: 713: 688: 2918:

with you on excluding individual organizations if too great in number, like US law enforcement agencies).

2134:"Ruger & His Guns" lists this data. It's a fairly thorough book. Current twist can be verified here: 2057: 1302: 2470:

No oil drilling platforms are taller than the Burj Dubai. If there really is, I'd like to know the name.

2070: 2638: 1871: 1720: 709: 684: 156: 135: 2078: 2024: 2003: 3560: 3517: 3475: 3414: 3294: 3277: 3210: 3194: 3143: 3106: 3045: 2984: 2938: 2889: 2775: 2710: 2669: 2647: 2578: 2540: 2494: 2423: 2347: 2295: 2233: 2142: 2098: 2041: 1957: 1917: 1808: 1773: 1739: 1735: 1656: 1609: 1563: 1505: 1423: 1385: 1214: 1179: 1165: 1095: 1051: 1015: 969: 855: 796: 474: 425: 297: 232: 102: 47: 17: 3010: 2956: 2135: 335: 3533: 3508: 3492: 3489:

if you want to discuss this civilly, the reason i removed your new source about 'perceived recoil'

3435: 3084: 3056: 3019: 2964: 2849: 2683: 2617: 2559: 2524: 2439: 2388: 2364: 2316: 2263: 2205: 2171: 1940: 1899: 1827: 1793: 1443: 1365: 1238: 1195: 984: 941: 879: 815: 780: 746: 131: 3470:

Nothing in your response indicates you read my appeal and you don't address any points I made. --

3157: 3129: 2923: 2733: 1758: 1679: 1636: 1592: 1548: 1349: 1288: 1273: 1113: 1076: 1036: 997: 953: 214: 3402: 2752: 2605: 1984: 246: 1998:

And who are you anyway to throw around 3RR-templates. You certainly don't look like an admin. (

2124: 2052: 1523: 1516: 1404: 1141: 989: 945: 921: 913: 656: 640: 451: 410: 357: 266: 167: 113: 1623: 390: 250: 3457: 3260: 2732:

The incivility and edit warring, which you are fully participating in, has continued on the

2635: 2074: 2020: 1999: 1716: 1466: 1451: 1260: 836: 617: 148: 3177: 3078: 3014: 2998: 2994: 2748: 2744: 2601: 1583: 398: 394: 382: 254: 245:

Actually, we're beyond opinion here - we're at the "if you keep ignoring policy, you'll be

203:

Images #2. Note that I'm not asking for the image's deletion; it just doesn't belong here.

200: 3556: 3513: 3471: 3410: 3326: 3290: 3273: 3221: 3206: 3190: 3139: 3102: 3041: 2980: 2934: 2885: 2771: 2706: 2665: 2574: 2536: 2490: 2419: 2343: 2291: 2229: 2138: 2094: 2037: 1953: 1913: 1804: 1769: 1652: 1605: 1559: 1501: 1481:

I do not appreciate being called a "twit", and furthermore, that puts YOU in violation of

1440:

Talk:B-2 Spirit#"WP:Air/PC" "Project Aircraft" not a definitive blueprint for this article

1439: 1419: 1381: 1210: 1175: 1160: 1091: 1047: 1011: 965: 851: 792: 632: 508: 470: 443: 421: 293: 249:" stage. So, please do not re-insert the picture into that article, and please do review 228: 98: 3101:

What the fuck. Dude, you DON'T consider this harassment? Do a fucking google search. --

3002: 2489:

Please. The Magnlia oil platform is 1,432m vs. the 818m of the Dubai oil-money tower. --

1341: 1194:

Hi, I just wanted to say thanks for the good work you doing with gun-related articles! --

870:

I would appreciate your input on the new proposal to merge the C8 page with the C7 page (

677: 591: 1418:

CIP is as authoritative as SAAMI nor do I think ANY ammo article here needs CIP data. --

3432: 2899: 2873: 2679: 2613: 2555: 2520: 2433: 2382: 2358: 2310: 2254: 2196: 2162: 1931: 1890: 1849: 1823: 1789: 1630:

to the problem is going to require a human explanation, not an automated template." ...

1234: 875: 811: 776: 767: 740: 738:. I've properly formatted the case page and left you some questions to answer. Thanks, 3564: 3541: 3521: 3500: 3479: 3438: 3418: 3298: 3281: 3214: 3198: 3160: 3147: 3132: 3110: 3092: 3064: 3049: 3027: 2988: 2972: 2942: 2927: 2904: 2893: 2878: 2857: 2842: 2811: 2779: 2764: 2714: 2687: 2673: 2650: 2641: 2621: 2582: 2563: 2544: 2528: 2498: 2479: 2451: 2427: 2400: 2376: 2351: 2328: 2306: 2299: 2276: 2237: 2218: 2184: 2146: 2128: 2102: 2082: 2045: 2028: 2007: 1961: 1943: 1921: 1902: 1854: 1831: 1812: 1797: 1777: 1762: 1743: 1723: 1683: 1660: 1640: 1613: 1596: 1567: 1552: 1509: 1494: 1470: 1455: 1427: 1408: 1389: 1373: 1323: 1292: 1277: 1242: 1218: 1203: 1183: 1167: 1145: 1117: 1099: 1080: 1055: 1019: 1001: 973: 957: 925: 902: 883: 859: 843: 819: 800: 784: 751: 723: 698: 660: 644: 598: 478: 455: 429: 414: 361: 301: 270: 236: 220: 174: 166:

I'm one step ahead of Luna here :) Thanks for holding ground against that weirdo :)

161: 139: 120: 106: 87: 2960: 2919: 2737: 1972: 1754: 1675: 1632: 1588: 1544: 1284: 1269: 1109: 1072: 1032: 993: 949: 898: 772: 206: 83: 2955:]. the glock.com source says nothing about "perceived" recoil, so i removed it. see 1711:, and the most recent version of the article using the new layout I came up with is 1229:

Hi, Nukes. I wanted to let you know a recent checkuser I filed on Commons turned up

130:

The matter is being dealt with now, well done for keeping your cool. Happy editing,

2726: 2120: 1400: 1137: 917: 705: 673: 652: 636: 595: 447: 406: 353: 262: 1069: 2678:

I guess I just skimmed the edit summary and jumped to conclusions ^^; Apologies.

2791:

The talk page is not protected. Only the article, and only for 2 1/2 more days.

2242:

I'm not putting Lebanon as a whole, I have specified security branches using it.

1708: 1703: 1462: 1447: 1230: 937: 829: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2933:

If I removed an important date inadvertantly, it should possibly go back in. --

2508: 2464: 2051:

Well, as you can see at the examples provided above, what I have added to the

1976: 253:, specifically the sections pointed out to you already, several times. Also, 196: 188: 2065: 1909: 666: 192: 3184:, available to people who can't reach agreement. If you are willing to say 1342:

free current C.I.P. CD-ROM version download (100+ MB in ZIP and RAR format)

317: 3253:

after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may

1301:

Indeed we have. See Koalorka's page for discussion, if you're interested.

1134:, you tried to add a citation to the Garand article. It is a <ref: --> 894: 79: 3401:. He then questioned a source that I added that agreed with his source: 680:

status, and one of the criteria is that the article should have images.

577:

You don't need a (non free) photo of Malcolm X in an article about a gun

403:

You don't need a (non free) photo of Malcolm X in an article about a gun

2137:. The Libraries usually have this book. I can't locate my copy now. -- 893:

Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--

631:

I'd ask that any reviewing administrator to also see the discussion at

439: 3406: 3405:. Further, he knew he was forum shopping because he asked for advice: 3040:

You're hounding me on my talk page. How civil am I supposed to be? --

1983:

so providing information about the perpetrator is nothing new. As per

708:

have done the same thing. But delete what you think is appropriate. —

338:

and inappropriate use of non-free content despite being warned to stop

3529:

the source is supposed to directly back up the claim in the article.

2634:

listing. You can indeed get anything you want, and sometimes more. --

2249: 2153: 1883: 1693: 1337: 446:

just because he happens to be in possession of them? I think not. -

2246: 1971:

Ok, so what's your problem? We have, besides others, articles about

1878: 1026:

Please stop posting this company's info for tangentially related...

2609: 1356: 940:, whose page title has been changed to resolve this ambiguity, to 936:

Apparently you feel it is more useful to have the reader click to

187:

And how exactly is the photo required for reader comprehension in

1702:

I notice that you've recently been involved in discussion on the

1068:

page. It may change your mind about the Model 1910 made by USFA

1578:

Seriously, you have got to BS-ing me here, haven't you heard of

1264: 1249: 944:

to distinguish this Hiram, inventor of the Maxim Gun, from son,

3527:

are misunderstanding what sources are supposed to be used for.

1912:. Plese provide a source that they use the M249 or go away. -- 1874:

as users of this weapon. Please have a look at these photos:

1442:

interesting. I think your perspective on the issues raised by

1253: 25: 2953:

First, you are edit warring to include unsourced information

1461:

Thanks for participating. I hope this can be settled soom. -

283:

I don't respond to threats. Especially if you're wrong. NFCC

3306: 3220: 2770:

I'm not engaging in personal attacks or incivil behavior. --

1533:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1515: 488: 316: 3077:

for your info, i brought the situation to the attention of

1803:

LOL. If you outlaw nukes, only outlaws will have nukes. --

1352:

standards. NATO obviously chose to ignore SAAMI standards.

1866:

You have rolled back my edit for the operators section in

1348:

in this case. There are also relations between C.I.P. and

1340:. If you download the C.I.P. decisions, texts and tables ( 3445:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

605:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

3465:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2997:, which is a policy here. other applicable policies are 736:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for checkuser/Case/Jetwave Dave

730:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for checkuser/Case/Jetwave Dave

625:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

3376: 3372: 3366: 3357: 3353: 3339: 3335: 3331: 3006: 2594: 1712: 1673:). Another thing, ever heard of technical foul? Ha! ... 1131: 810:

good to delete them completely and start from scratch.

558: 554: 548: 539: 535: 521: 517: 513: 379: 376: 373: 370: 367: 258: 199:-- as it stands, it's pretty much the example cited in 766:

that are easily tracked and blocked. I'm not sure how

3314:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

3156:

There ya go. "Ah, they grow up so fast these days!"

2788:

Responding to your notes here and on my talk page...

496:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

3180:concerning your edits. We do have a process called 405:; it just isn't necessary, as Fair use requires. - 340:. To contest this block, please reply here on your 97:. Quite a waste of time for legitemate users. -- 2755:. If this continues accounts will be blocked. 1025: 704:As I mentioned, other featured articles such as 1848:section already in Talk section of .30 carbine 1283:Admins have been notified regarding this user. 389:". Other people are attempting to enforce our 1446:would be valuable here. Thanks for looking. - 1108:Thank you for correcting my misunderstanding. 2725:Final warning - civility and edit warring on 1522:Hello, Nukes4Tots. You have new messages at 8: 1930:Could you please speak with a nicer tone? -- 195:. There's no way you can justify its use in 1734:numerous air forces throughtout the '70s.-- 1580:Knowledge (XXG):Don't template the regulars 762:busies himself with creating accounts like 401:section (among others) of the NFC policy. 2093:Take it to the article discussion page. -- 1860:LAF as user of M249 Squad Automatic Weapon 2898:I have replied to you on the talk page.-- 1355:The American equivalent of C.I.P. is the 393:, which exempts them from 3RR, as stated 3243:Personal attacks, as discussed at WP:AN3 3018:violation of incivility. very not cool. 1586:regardless of you citing me for 3RR. ... 1438:Nukes, you might find the discussion at 2993:you're wrong, uncivil, and you need to 1500:My, you're a cheery one, aren't you? -- 2625:seriously, that was uncalled for, dude 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7: 2245:Do you need more than these proofs? 1671:Knowledge (XXG):There is no deadline 1071:being related to the FN model 1910. 1066:U.S. Fire Arms Manufacturing Company 2602:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks 1483:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks 1263:is revert-warring with me over the 676:. I'm trying to get the article to 2795:end, both of you need to back off. 2519:related to Walther PPK's? Thanks, 1225:Jetwave has followed us to Commons 24: 3239:Knowledge (XXG)'s blocking policy 2884:Been there, done that. Thanks. -- 1364:comes from third party sources.-- 350:Knowledge (XXG):Appealing a block 257:, as you did in the edit summary 29: 1981:Eric Harris & Dylan Klebold 1844:continue the discussion in the 633:Talk:M1 carbine#Malcolm X photo 366:Recent reverts: (others prior) 1717:Chris Cunningham (not at work) 1558:It's all 1's and 0's to me. -- 1243:13:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 1219:21:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1204:21:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 1184:20:52, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1168:20:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 1146:11:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 1118:02:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 1100:14:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 1081:00:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 1056:00:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 1041:23:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 1020:10:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 1002:00:39, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 974:00:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 958:23:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 926:15:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 764:User:Parsecboy is a Paedophile 1: 3233:from editing for a period of 2103:11:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 2083:01:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 2046:01:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 2029:01:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 2008:00:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1962:20:37, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 1944:00:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 1922:00:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC) 1903:23:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC) 1855:19:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 1846:References for "Civilian use" 903:05:23, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 884:15:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 866:Input on C7/C8 merge proposal 397:. You are clearly violating 344:by adding the text {{unblock| 170:weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 116:weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 3565:23:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3542:20:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3522:20:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3501:19:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3480:18:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3439:18:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3419:17:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 3299:22:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3282:22:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3215:20:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3199:20:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3161:05:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3148:04:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3133:04:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3111:00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 3093:23:55, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3065:23:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3050:23:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 3028:22:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2989:21:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2973:21:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2943:21:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2928:20:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2905:17:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 2894:18:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 2879:18:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 2858:22:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 2843:21:48, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 2812:19:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 2780:04:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 2765:02:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 2715:23:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2688:23:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2674:17:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2651:13:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2642:10:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2622:08:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2583:22:10, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2564:21:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 2545:01:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2529:21:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 2499:18:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 2480:17:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 2452:09:44, 17 January 2009 (UTC) 2428:21:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2401:07:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2377:20:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 2352:18:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 2329:10:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 2300:08:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 2277:07:44, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 2238:18:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC) 2219:12:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC) 2185:11:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC) 2147:06:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 2129:06:29, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 2064:, but there was, so far, no 1832:13:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC) 1813:13:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC) 1798:12:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC) 1778:20:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 1763:14:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC) 1744:14:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC) 1724:15:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1684:16:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1669:Like I've said, I can wait ( 1661:16:30, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1641:16:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1614:16:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1597:16:02, 28 October 2008 (UTC) 1568:10:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 1553:01:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 1510:13:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 1495:02:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 1471:00:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 1456:22:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 1428:16:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1409:15:02, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1390:11:05, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 1374:09:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 747:Make articles, not wikidrama 3318:, who declined the request. 1868:M249 Squad Automatic Weapon 1324:07:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1293:02:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 1278:18:22, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 860:15:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 844:03:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 820:02:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 801:02:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 785:02:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 752:18:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 724:17:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 699:17:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 500:, who declined the request. 255:do not call people "racist" 3585: 2833:it. Thank you for that. 2749:no personal attacks policy 2111:Mini 14 suggestions needed 1709:Talk:FN P90#Content update 1336:The information source is 661:23:17, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 645:18:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 599:18:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 479:14:37, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 456:14:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 430:14:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 415:14:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 362:14:15, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 302:12:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 271:03:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC) 3449:guide to appealing blocks 2630:The above arises from an 609:guide to appealing blocks 391:Non free content policies 237:05:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 221:03:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC) 175:21:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 162:21:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 140:08:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 121:21:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 107:21:05, 21 July 2008 (UTC) 88:20:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC) 2606:Knowledge (XXG):Civility 201:WP:NFC#Unacceptable uses 3485:removed your new source 3169:Please offer to follow 3005:, which come into play 2872:Please see talk page.-- 2753:and our civility policy 2483:User:Daniel Christensen 1434:Participation requested 1209:Wow, thanks! I try. -- 3311: 3225: 2381:Expecting a reply...-- 1784:thermonuclear sidearms 1520: 908:Gas operation proposal 493: 321: 3363:change block settings 3310: 3245:. You are welcome to 3224: 3182:WP:Dispute resolution 3171:WP:Dispute resolution 2485:. Forgot to sign in. 2062:WikiProject Biography 1872:Lebanese Armed Forces 1519: 1332:Pistol cartridge Pmax 1064:This is cited on the 545:change block settings 492: 320: 42:of past discussions. 2835:Georgewilliamherbert 2804:Georgewilliamherbert 2757:Georgewilliamherbert 2610:meta:Don't be a dick 1622:Taken from the page 889:WikiProject Firearms 381:. You'll note from 18:User talk:Nukes4Tots 3509:cartridge (firearm) 3263:|Your reason here}} 3257:by adding the text 3237:in accordance with 2745:edit warring policy 2058:article in question 1628:amicable resolution 1524:Barneca's talk page 1444:User:Critical Chris 985:Hiram Stevens Maxim 942:Hiram Stevens Maxim 912:See my proposal at 590:The policy against 3312: 3270:the AN3 discussion 3255:contest this block 3226: 2949:Stop edit warring. 2743:This has violated 2734:Talk:Glock pistols 1870:where I added the 1531:remove this notice 1521: 1350:NATO EPVAT testing 494: 322: 2626: 2053:Stockton massacre 1967:Stockton massacre 1749:Small arms height 990:Hiram Percy Maxim 946:Hiram Percy Maxim 931:Nice slam, thanks 914:User talk:Geodkyt 218: 72: 71: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3576: 3462: 3456: 3382: 3380: 3369: 3351: 3349:deleted contribs 3309: 3264: 3128:on your block." 2902: 2876: 2624: 2589:civility warning 2448: 2443: 2436: 2397: 2392: 2385: 2373: 2368: 2361: 2325: 2320: 2313: 2275: 2272: 2267: 2257: 2217: 2214: 2209: 2199: 2183: 2180: 2175: 2165: 1942: 1934: 1908:Dude, that's an 1901: 1893: 1534: 1316: 1261:User:Orthopraxia 1163: 840: 833: 743: 678:Featured article 622: 616: 564: 562: 551: 533: 531:deleted contribs 491: 346:your reason here 329:for a period of 219: 212: 209: 172: 160: 153: 118: 78:interesting. -- 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3584: 3583: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3487: 3468: 3460: 3454: 3453:, then use the 3442: 3422: 3370: 3360: 3346: 3329: 3322:blocking policy 3307: 3266: 3258: 3186:anything at all 3174: 3121: 2951: 2915: 2900: 2874: 2870: 2730: 2648:KillerChihuahua 2591: 2512: 2468: 2449: 2446: 2441: 2434: 2398: 2395: 2390: 2383: 2374: 2371: 2366: 2359: 2326: 2323: 2318: 2311: 2273: 2270: 2265: 2262: 2255: 2215: 2212: 2207: 2204: 2197: 2181: 2178: 2173: 2170: 2163: 2158: 2113: 2060:is part of the 1969: 1939: 1932: 1898: 1891: 1862: 1842: 1786: 1751: 1731: 1697: 1576: 1540: 1535: 1528: 1479: 1477:Personal attack 1436: 1334: 1321: 1320:Call me MoP! :) 1303: 1257: 1248:Assitance with 1227: 1192: 1161: 1153: 1128: 1028: 933: 910: 891: 868: 838: 831: 759: 750: 739: 732: 670: 628: 620: 614: 613:, then use the 602: 581: 552: 542: 528: 511: 504:blocking policy 489: 364: 314: 207: 204: 185: 168: 149: 147: 128: 114: 74:You might find 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3582: 3580: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3547: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3534:Theserialcomma 3493:Theserialcomma 3486: 3483: 3443: 3429: 3425:Decline reason 3391: 3387:Request reason 3384: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3227:You have been 3219: 3218: 3217: 3173: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3151: 3150: 3120: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3096: 3095: 3085:Theserialcomma 3074: 3073: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3057:Theserialcomma 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3020:Theserialcomma 2965:Theserialcomma 2950: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2914: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2869: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2850:Theserialcomma 2830: 2823: 2822: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2789: 2783: 2782: 2729: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2590: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2548: 2547: 2511: 2506: 2504: 2502: 2501: 2467: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2445: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2394: 2370: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2322: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2269: 2251: 2243: 2222: 2221: 2211: 2193: 2177: 2157: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2112: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2087: 2086: 2033: 2032: 2017: 2016: 1997: 1968: 1965: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1925: 1924: 1887: 1886: 1881: 1865: 1861: 1858: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1816: 1815: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1750: 1747: 1730: 1727: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1664: 1663: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1617: 1616: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1539: 1538:M1 Garand Type 1536: 1527: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1487:206.130.99.180 1478: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1435: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1393: 1392: 1366:Francis Flinch 1333: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1319: 1296: 1295: 1256: 1246: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1196:Boris Barowski 1191: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1152: 1149: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1103: 1102: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1059: 1058: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 977: 976: 932: 929: 909: 906: 890: 887: 867: 864: 863: 862: 825: 824: 823: 822: 804: 803: 768:User:DroneZone 758: 755: 744: 731: 728: 727: 726: 669: 664: 648: 647: 603: 588: 584:Decline reason 573: 569:Request reason 566: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 461: 460: 459: 458: 433: 432: 324:You have been 315: 313: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 276: 275: 274: 273: 240: 239: 184: 181: 180: 179: 178: 177: 127: 124: 110: 109: 70: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3581: 3566: 3562: 3558: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3530: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3519: 3515: 3510: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3484: 3482: 3481: 3477: 3473: 3467: 3466: 3459: 3452: 3450: 3441: 3440: 3437: 3434: 3428: 3426: 3421: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3390: 3388: 3383: 3378: 3374: 3368: 3364: 3359: 3355: 3350: 3345: 3341: 3340:global blocks 3337: 3336:active blocks 3333: 3328: 3323: 3319: 3317: 3316:administrator 3300: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3262: 3256: 3252: 3251:contributions 3250: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3231: 3223: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3172: 3168: 3162: 3159: 3158:Baseball Bugs 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3131: 3130:Baseball Bugs 3127: 3118: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3080: 3076: 3075: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2962: 2961:glock pistols 2958: 2954: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2912: 2906: 2903: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2877: 2867: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2831: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2819: 2818: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2790: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2741: 2739: 2738:Glock pistols 2735: 2728: 2724: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2652: 2649: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2598: 2596: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2571: 2570: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2510: 2507: 2505: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2484: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2466: 2463: 2453: 2450: 2447:Contributions 2440: 2437: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2402: 2399: 2396:Contributions 2389: 2386: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2375: 2372:Contributions 2365: 2362: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2330: 2327: 2324:Contributions 2317: 2314: 2308: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2278: 2274: 2271:Contributions 2264: 2261: 2258: 2252: 2250: 2247: 2244: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2220: 2216: 2213:Contributions 2206: 2203: 2200: 2194: 2192: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2182: 2179:Contributions 2172: 2169: 2166: 2155: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2116: 2110: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1995: 1991: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973:Seung-Hui Cho 1966: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1945: 1941: 1938: 1935: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1923: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1897: 1894: 1885: 1882: 1880: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1873: 1869: 1859: 1857: 1856: 1853: 1852: 1847: 1839: 1833: 1829: 1825: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1748: 1746: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1728: 1726: 1725: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1692: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1672: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1649: 1648: 1643: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1585: 1581: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1537: 1532: 1525: 1518: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1416: 1415: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1361: 1358: 1353: 1351: 1345: 1343: 1339: 1331: 1325: 1322: 1317: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1266: 1262: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1158: 1151:Canadian club 1150: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1133: 1125: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1088: 1087: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1008: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 986: 981: 980: 979: 978: 975: 971: 967: 962: 961: 960: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 930: 928: 927: 923: 919: 915: 907: 905: 904: 900: 896: 888: 886: 885: 881: 877: 873: 865: 861: 857: 853: 848: 847: 846: 845: 842: 841: 835: 834: 821: 817: 813: 808: 807: 806: 805: 802: 798: 794: 789: 788: 787: 786: 782: 778: 774: 773:User:Dmcdevit 769: 765: 756: 754: 753: 748: 742: 737: 729: 725: 721: 718: 715: 711: 710:Malik Shabazz 707: 703: 702: 701: 700: 696: 693: 690: 686: 685:Malik Shabazz 683:Thank you. — 681: 679: 675: 668: 665: 663: 662: 658: 654: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 629: 627: 626: 619: 612: 610: 601: 600: 597: 593: 587: 585: 580: 578: 572: 570: 565: 560: 556: 550: 546: 541: 537: 532: 527: 523: 522:global blocks 519: 518:active blocks 515: 510: 505: 501: 499: 498:administrator 480: 476: 472: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 436: 435: 434: 431: 427: 423: 419: 418: 417: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 377: 374: 371: 368: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 337: 332: 328: 327: 319: 311: 303: 299: 295: 290: 286: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 243: 242: 241: 238: 234: 230: 225: 224: 223: 222: 216: 211: 210: 202: 198: 194: 190: 182: 176: 173: 171: 165: 164: 163: 158: 154: 152: 144: 143: 142: 141: 137: 133: 125: 123: 122: 119: 117: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 91: 90: 89: 85: 81: 77: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3528: 3488: 3469: 3464: 3446: 3444: 3430: 3424: 3423: 3392: 3386: 3385: 3358:creation log 3325: 3313: 3267: 3248: 3242: 3234: 3228: 3185: 3175: 3125: 3122: 2952: 2916: 2871: 2742: 2731: 2727:Glock pistol 2599: 2592: 2516: 2513: 2503: 2472:64.80.57.251 2469: 2259: 2201: 2190: 2167: 2159: 2117: 2114: 2034: 1970: 1950: 1936: 1895: 1888: 1863: 1850: 1845: 1843: 1787: 1752: 1732: 1701: 1698: 1674: 1631: 1627: 1587: 1577: 1541: 1480: 1437: 1362: 1354: 1346: 1335: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1258: 1228: 1193: 1156: 1154: 1129: 1029: 934: 911: 892: 869: 837: 830: 826: 760: 733: 716: 706:Emma Goldman 691: 682: 674:Emma Goldman 671: 649: 624: 606: 604: 592:edit warring 589: 583: 582: 576: 574: 568: 567: 540:creation log 507: 495: 402: 386: 365: 345: 341: 336:Edit warring 334: 330: 323: 288: 284: 205: 186: 169: 150: 129: 115: 111: 95:Jetwave Dave 73: 60: 43: 37: 2636:Tagishsimon 1840:.30 carbine 1704:Talk:FN P90 1126:Garand Cite 938:Hiram Maxim 734:Please see 151:Luna Santin 126:Harrassment 36:This is an 3557:Nukes4Tots 3514:Nukes4Tots 3507:it on the 3472:Nukes4Tots 3411:Nukes4Tots 3354:filter log 3327:Nukes4Tots 3291:Nukes4Tots 3274:EdJohnston 3207:Nukes4Tots 3191:EdJohnston 3140:Nukes4Tots 3103:Nukes4Tots 3042:Nukes4Tots 3011:WP:PROVEIT 2981:Nukes4Tots 2957:WP:PROVEIT 2935:Nukes4Tots 2913:Users list 2886:Nukes4Tots 2772:Nukes4Tots 2707:Nukes4Tots 2666:Nukes4Tots 2575:Nukes4Tots 2537:Nukes4Tots 2509:Walther_PP 2491:Nukes4Tots 2465:Burj Dubai 2420:Nukes4Tots 2344:Nukes4Tots 2292:Nukes4Tots 2230:Nukes4Tots 2139:Nukes4Tots 2095:Nukes4Tots 2038:Nukes4Tots 1977:Jeff Weise 1954:Nukes4Tots 1914:Nukes4Tots 1805:Nukes4Tots 1770:Nukes4Tots 1736:Panzertank 1715:. Thanks! 1653:Nukes4Tots 1606:Nukes4Tots 1560:Nukes4Tots 1502:Nukes4Tots 1420:Nukes4Tots 1382:Nukes4Tots 1211:Nukes4Tots 1176:Nukes4Tots 1162:TREKphiler 1092:Nukes4Tots 1048:Nukes4Tots 1012:Nukes4Tots 966:Nukes4Tots 852:Nukes4Tots 793:Nukes4Tots 757:re:Jetwave 536:filter log 509:Nukes4Tots 471:Nukes4Tots 422:Nukes4Tots 294:Nukes4Tots 229:Nukes4Tots 197:M1 Carbine 189:M1 Carbine 183:M1 Carbine 99:Nukes4Tots 3447:read the 3433:Athaenara 3373:checkuser 3332:block log 2740:article. 2736:page and 2680:Xavexgoem 2614:Xavexgoem 2593:don't do 2556:Dictouray 2521:Dictouray 2435:Zaher1988 2384:Zaher1988 2360:Zaher1988 2312:Zaher1988 2256:Zaher1988 2198:Zaher1988 2164:Zaher1988 2156:operators 2071:offensive 2066:biography 1933:Zaher1988 1910:FN MINIMI 1892:Zaher1988 1884:Photo two 1879:Photo one 1824:Gwen Gale 1790:Gwen Gale 1235:Parsecboy 876:Thatguy96 812:Parsecboy 777:Parsecboy 741:Nishkid64 667:Malcolm X 607:read the 555:checkuser 514:block log 342:talk page 285:Guideline 193:Malcolm X 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 3344:contribs 3235:24 hours 2920:Koalorka 2075:Lord Gøn 2021:Lord Gøn 2000:Lord Gøn 1985:WP:BIO1E 1755:Koalorka 1676:Dave1185 1633:Dave1185 1589:Dave1185 1545:Akyoyo94 1529:You can 1399:specs.-- 1285:Koalorka 1270:Koalorka 1231:Nuke4Tot 1130:In this 1110:Newportm 1073:Newportm 1033:Newportm 994:Newportm 950:Newportm 720:contribs 695:contribs 526:contribs 440:neckties 331:31 hours 208:howcheng 132:Chafford 3458:unblock 3367:unblock 3265:below. 3261:unblock 3230:blocked 3189:offer. 2829:bounds. 2121:Tengu99 1624:WP:DTTR 1401:Ana Nim 1138:J Clear 872:Discuss 653:Rjd0060 637:Rjd0060 618:unblock 596:Kafziel 549:unblock 448:Rjd0060 407:Rjd0060 354:Rjd0060 326:blocked 312:Blocked 263:Rjd0060 251:WP:NFCC 247:blocked 39:archive 3249:useful 3178:WP:AN3 3079:WP:ANI 3015:WP:NOR 2999:WP:NOR 2995:WP:AGF 2901:Patton 2875:Patton 2639:(talk) 2608:, and 2191:UPDATE 2154:FN P90 2015:added? 1694:FN P90 1584:WP:IAR 1463:BillCJ 1448:BillCJ 1338:C.I.P. 1315:uppets 1307:aster 1190:thanks 385:that " 383:WP:3RR 289:Policy 3451:first 3247:make 3119:Nukes 3003:WP:RS 1357:SAAMI 611:first 444:suits 442:, or 16:< 3561:talk 3538:talk 3518:talk 3497:talk 3476:talk 3415:talk 3407:here 3403:here 3399:here 3397:and 3395:here 3295:talk 3278:talk 3241:for 3211:talk 3195:talk 3144:talk 3126:last 3107:talk 3089:talk 3061:talk 3046:talk 3024:talk 3007:here 3001:and 2985:talk 2969:talk 2939:talk 2924:talk 2890:talk 2868:M249 2854:talk 2839:talk 2808:talk 2799:too. 2776:talk 2761:talk 2711:talk 2684:talk 2670:talk 2632:AN/I 2618:talk 2595:this 2579:talk 2560:talk 2541:talk 2525:talk 2495:talk 2476:talk 2424:talk 2348:talk 2307:here 2296:talk 2248:and 2234:talk 2143:talk 2125:talk 2099:talk 2079:talk 2042:talk 2025:talk 2004:talk 1994:here 1992:and 1990:here 1979:and 1958:talk 1918:talk 1851:SJSA 1828:talk 1809:talk 1794:talk 1774:talk 1759:talk 1740:talk 1729:P-51 1721:talk 1713:here 1699:Hi, 1680:talk 1657:talk 1637:talk 1610:talk 1593:talk 1574:3RR? 1564:talk 1549:talk 1506:talk 1491:talk 1467:talk 1452:talk 1424:talk 1405:talk 1386:talk 1370:talk 1289:talk 1274:talk 1265:Misr 1259:Hi, 1250:Misr 1239:talk 1215:talk 1200:talk 1180:talk 1142:talk 1132:edit 1114:talk 1096:talk 1077:talk 1052:talk 1037:talk 1016:talk 998:talk 970:talk 954:talk 922:talk 918:scot 899:talk 880:talk 856:talk 816:talk 797:talk 781:talk 714:talk 689:talk 657:talk 641:talk 475:talk 452:talk 426:talk 411:talk 399:this 395:here 358:talk 333:for 298:talk 267:talk 259:here 233:talk 215:chat 157:talk 136:talk 103:talk 84:talk 76:this 3377:log 3324:). 3081:at 2517:not 1864:Hey 1254:AKM 1157:was 895:LWF 839:MP5 832:Dan 559:log 506:). 80:Yaf 3563:) 3540:) 3520:) 3512:-- 3499:) 3478:) 3461:}} 3455:{{ 3436:✉ 3427:: 3417:) 3389:: 3371:• 3365:• 3361:• 3356:• 3352:• 3347:• 3342:• 3338:• 3334:• 3297:) 3280:) 3272:. 3259:{{ 3213:) 3197:) 3146:) 3109:) 3091:) 3083:] 3063:) 3048:) 3026:) 2987:) 2971:) 2941:) 2926:) 2892:) 2856:) 2841:) 2810:) 2778:) 2763:) 2751:, 2747:, 2713:) 2686:) 2672:) 2620:) 2612:. 2604:, 2597:. 2581:) 2562:) 2543:) 2527:) 2497:) 2478:) 2438:· 2426:) 2387:· 2363:· 2350:) 2315:· 2298:) 2290:-- 2253:-- 2236:) 2228:-- 2145:) 2127:) 2101:) 2081:) 2073:.( 2044:) 2027:) 2010:) 2006:) 1975:, 1960:) 1920:) 1889:-- 1830:) 1811:) 1796:) 1776:) 1761:) 1742:) 1719:- 1682:) 1659:) 1651:-- 1639:) 1612:) 1595:) 1566:) 1551:) 1508:) 1493:) 1469:) 1454:) 1426:) 1407:) 1388:) 1372:) 1311:f 1291:) 1276:) 1241:) 1217:) 1202:) 1182:) 1174:-- 1144:) 1136:-- 1116:) 1098:) 1079:) 1054:) 1039:) 1018:) 1000:) 972:) 956:) 924:) 901:) 882:) 858:) 818:) 799:) 783:) 722:) 697:) 659:) 643:) 621:}} 615:{{ 586:: 571:: 553:• 547:• 543:• 538:• 534:• 529:• 524:• 520:• 516:• 477:) 454:) 428:) 413:) 378:, 375:, 372:, 369:, 360:) 352:. 300:) 269:) 235:) 138:) 105:) 86:) 3559:( 3536:( 3516:( 3495:( 3474:( 3413:( 3381:) 3379:) 3375:( 3330:( 3293:( 3276:( 3209:( 3193:( 3142:( 3105:( 3087:( 3059:( 3044:( 3022:( 2983:( 2967:( 2937:( 2922:( 2888:( 2852:( 2837:( 2806:( 2774:( 2759:( 2709:( 2682:( 2668:( 2616:( 2577:( 2558:( 2539:( 2523:( 2493:( 2474:( 2442:| 2422:( 2391:| 2367:| 2346:( 2319:| 2294:( 2266:| 2260:· 2232:( 2208:| 2202:· 2174:| 2168:· 2141:( 2123:( 2097:( 2085:) 2077:( 2040:( 2031:) 2023:( 2002:( 1956:( 1937:· 1916:( 1896:· 1826:( 1807:( 1792:( 1772:( 1757:( 1738:( 1678:( 1655:( 1635:( 1608:( 1591:( 1562:( 1547:( 1526:. 1504:( 1489:( 1465:( 1450:( 1422:( 1403:( 1384:( 1368:( 1313:P 1309:o 1305:M 1287:( 1272:( 1252:/ 1237:( 1213:( 1198:( 1178:( 1140:( 1112:( 1094:( 1075:( 1050:( 1035:( 1014:( 996:( 968:( 952:( 920:( 897:( 878:( 854:( 814:( 795:( 779:( 749:) 745:( 717:· 712:( 692:· 687:( 655:( 639:( 563:) 561:) 557:( 512:( 473:( 450:( 424:( 409:( 356:( 296:( 265:( 231:( 217:} 213:{ 159:) 155:( 134:( 101:( 82:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index