885:
25:
755:, I thought that the user, Nuksanhai, was talking about a specific page and hence, asked the user to share the page link for a fruitful discussion. But, as I understood his/her point later, it was mostly a generic rant claiming all educational pages are paid pages, to which I didn't have anything further to add, as the argument wasn't logical.
371:. You must not keep on contacting people in the way that you are doing, with non-neutral messages intended to bias a particular outcome. It's best not to contact random users for these types of discussions in the first place; people will see deletion requests that you make through the normal processes. Please also see
676:
and
Nuksanhai, please tell me what "title advice" I gave you. You will achieve more credibility if you learn to keep a discussion thread in one place, to use wikilinks and not to use naked URLs. I will admit that the notability criteria for schools may have become more strict than when I last looked
611:
What do you mean. I have no profit in this.I do not know if it happens in your country, but it is very common in poor countries like India. Where there are certain companies/organization who run such schools and try to project their schools as best to make heavy profits. If you notice most of those
345:
What do you mean. I have no profit in this.I do not know if it happens in your country, but it is very common in poor countries like India. Where there are certain companies/organization who run such schools and try to project their schools as best to make heavy profits. If you notice most of those
98:
for any of these reversions. Edit summaries are needed when the reason for undoing the change is non-obvious—even if you think that the edit is obvious, but another user looking at it might be confused, it's best to leave an edit summary. For instance, while I would also revert the edit you reverted
555:
and hence shouldn't be deleted. For the third link, you are misinterpreting that guideline; the issue is not with reporting facts but with reporting insignificant facts or reporting facts in a non-neutral manner. We can say that the school was listed in that top ten ranking, as this is objective
850:
Hey
Nuksanhai, I'm rather concerned to see your mass prodding despite the discussions we've had above. I've told you before that G11 does not apply and explained that a more productive approach is to find some sources and improve the current article, rather than trying to fix things by blowing
467:
What is encyclopedic about it? Things like date established, size of school, principal etc. are non-promotional material, so CSD G11 is not appropriate. As for notability, why not try to find sources about the school to improve the article? Go do some research and some work so that the article
202:
that you left on an IP talk page. Many people around the world edit
Knowledge (XXG) and almost all of them have no connection to the subject. It's not appropriate to threaten a user with a block as the first time you talk to them. Bear in mind that this is in all likelihood the person's first
851:
everything up. I've reverted all your prod tagging because they were done so quickly and with the same insufficient rationale that you cannot have had time to look at each article properly. Note also what
Atlantic306 says above about high schools. Please stop this disruptive behaviour.
262:
My first thought was to use a summary like "reverting test edit" or "spelling error" and yes, that would be an excellent response. However, some editors think that changes this obviously wrong can be reverted without a summary, and in fact one editor already has done so.
776:
template to your userpage, it will show an icon at the top which allows people to email you. That way you don't have to have your email address displayed. Otherwise spam bots will skim your email address off your userpage and you are likely to be sent spam.
103:, this needs an explanation. This is particularly important with unregistered and new editors because we want to foster a positive atmosphere and hopefully convince them that Knowledge (XXG) is a place they want to be a part of! See
203:
experience of contributing to
Knowledge (XXG) and we don't want to scare them off. The editor has in fact explained the reason for their edits, but you have not explained the reason for yours.
130:. We don't generally block IP editors unless they have been repeatedly disruptive; it's a last resort when someone is clearly not here to contribute positively. What the situation at
387:
of sources, not about the current sourcing of the article. Before nominating a page at AFD, you must do your best to search for sources and add any that you find to the article (see
834:. The consensus is that proposed school deletions should not be flooding the system which you are doing and you have obviously not attempted to add sources so are being disruptive.
295:
Secondary schools enjoy a special protection here. If you really think that any of the school articles you have tagged should be deleted, you must take each one separately to
119:, as the IP editor making the change explained very clearly why their edit was an improvement, and you have not explained why the original version was correct. (Your edit
524:
379:
only applies in very, very specific cases and the pages you tagged are not solely promotional—they also contain encyclopedic content. If you wish to nominate pages at
514:
612:
schools lacks notability and do not have citations and those who have citations/references are mostly advertisement and the schools own website. For example see
346:
schools lacks notability and do not have citations and those who have citations/references are mostly advertisement and the schools own website. For example see
94:
Hi
Nuksanhai! I noticed you've been reverting a lot of IP editors' contributions very rapidly and I'm rather concerned that you don't seem to have left an
691:
to AfD and see how they fare. When they and all the other Indian schools have been deleted, why not start on some
English fee-paying schools - how about
677:
at them (ten years ago?). But any well-established article deserves more than a speedy delete tag. If you see any school article that you think is spam
142:—at that page you've reverted four times in 15 minutes without a single edit summary! This is actually a violation of a bright-line rule we have called
921:
127:
135:
928:
681:
it has been in mainspace for three months or less, feel free to tag it. But as for the rest, I insist that each one qualifies for its own
484:) "The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search".
375:, particularly "Editors should not flood AFD with indiscriminate or excessive nominations." Your behaviour is disruptive. Also note that
123:
was also incorrect but I understand why you would revert it; it's my fault for inserting the mistake into the page in the first place.)
525:
https://www.news18.com/news/india/top-ten-schools-in-east-delhi-rating-ranks-information-based-on-top-c-fore-surveys-2016-1506619.html
131:
805:. Also please note that high schools up to K12 are normally kept but elementary schools are normally redirected or deleted, thanks
515:
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/East-corporation-show-causes-DAV-for-building-on-playground/articleshow/18702008.cms
247:
can i tell him that"hey,there welcome to
Knowledge (XXG) please check your spellings before publishing an article. happy editing "
115:
are a mystery to me—it's not clear why you've undone these changes, which look useful to the articles. I've undone your reversion
564:
section which reflects positively on the school, but this is allowed as it is significant information reported in a neutral way.
33:
714:
336:
310:
519:
860:
573:
493:
400:
272:
212:
166:
898:
893:
773:
372:
198:
Thanks for the reply. I know that you made this edit before I posted the message above but I'm very concerned to see
914:
907:
903:
530:
445:
36:
have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
199:
120:
116:
112:
108:
100:
150:
41:
839:
810:
52:
350:. Just tell me which source in independent. I can give you hundreds of such articles and references.
616:. Just tell me which source in independent. I can give you hundreds of such articles and references.
368:
37:
831:
481:
388:
708:
601:
330:
304:
46:
Non- independent sources should not be removed unless they are replaced with independent sources.
146:: in the future, please do not revert more than three times to a single page within 24 hours.
823:
802:
551:
Yes, these are good sources and should be added to the article. They show that the school is
138:
and start a section about why you think your version is an improvement. The same is true for
104:
934:
863:
835:
806:
731:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Nuksanhai&diff=874138079&oldid=874109506
576:
496:
430:? That article looks like advertisement of that school not at all an encyclopedic article.
403:
275:
232:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sea_of_Thieves&diff=873672474&oldid=872872306
215:
169:
48:
29:
827:
682:
613:
477:
423:
380:
376:
347:
296:
154:
143:
760:
696:
692:
644:
561:
557:
418:
Ok, i will not contact anyone from now regarding this topic. But can you tell me what is
153:
so I can see replies that you make here. If you'd like to talk to another volunteer, the
95:
733:
652:
634:
617:
537:
472:
demonstrate notability. If you search as thoroughly as you are able to and cannot find
453:
431:
353:
248:
234:
184:
76:
62:
552:
520:
https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/delhi/dda-cancels-lease-of-public-school/512364.html
801:
Hi, once a proposed deletion notice has been removed it can never be replaced as per
750:
726:
704:
326:
300:
778:
700:
139:
855:
568:
488:
446:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Schools
395:
267:
207:
161:
944:
756:
668:
640:
531:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Article_guidelines#NEUT
884:
826:
properly, a prod notice can never be replaced and if you disagree take to
927:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
931:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
24:
952:
872:
843:
814:
791:
741:
718:
660:
625:
585:
545:
505:
461:
439:
412:
361:
340:
314:
284:
256:
242:
224:
192:
178:
84:
70:
56:
614:
https://en.wikipedia.org/D.A.V_Public_School_Sreshtha_Vihar#References
348:
https://en.wikipedia.org/D.A.V_Public_School_Sreshtha_Vihar#References
40:. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
107:
for a policy about this. Other edits such as your reversions
883:
424:
https://en.wikipedia.org/D.A.V_Public_School_Sreshtha_Vihar
920:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
157:
is always happy to answer any questions you have. Thanks!
730:
687:
592:
I just want
Knowledge (XXG) free from such advertising.
321:
231:
230:
please take a look at can i edit it without a summary
529:
according to wikipedia 3rd link can not be included (
126:
I also noticed that you've been posting messages at
452:presumed to be notable simply because they exist.
631:Tagging the page here in discussion would help,
32:. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
183:Sorry, i will never make such mistakes again.
8:
651:and thanks about your title advice RHaworth
134:needs is discussion on the talk page—visit
128:Knowledge (XXG):Editor assistance/Requests
560:about Malvern College has content in its
685:discussion. For starters, why not send
136:Talk:Symphony No. 9 (Vaughan Williams)
7:
75:and sorry for the problem i caused
906:. Note that multiple accounts are
14:
772:Hi, just some advice. If you add
132:Symphony No. 9 (Vaughan Williams)
23:
671:, I have no idea what you mean.
1:
953:19:24, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
873:19:12, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
844:19:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
815:18:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
792:13:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
742:18:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
719:17:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
661:13:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
626:12:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
586:16:18, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
546:15:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
506:15:20, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
462:14:28, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
440:14:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
413:14:10, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
362:12:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
341:11:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
315:11:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
285:11:43, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
257:11:40, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
243:11:35, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
225:11:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
193:10:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
179:10:55, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
85:15:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
71:15:11, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
57:15:09, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
448:that Secondary schools are
61:thanks for the suggestion.
969:
922:may be reverted or deleted
391:, particularly point D1).
929:guide to appealing blocks
904:abusing multiple accounts
556:fact. As an example, the
536:form google news search.
476:, you may nominate it at
383:, the case is then about
325:is strongly deprcated. —
34:your recent contributions
830:once you have completed
737:
729:by title advice i meant
541:
457:
435:
367:Firstly, take a look at
357:
252:
238:
188:
80:
66:
149:I have this page on my
888:
939:Your reason here ~~~~
887:
703:to name but three? —
444:And it is written in
144:the three-revert rule
562:Academic performance
480:—but note that (per
889:
602:user talk:RHaworth
902:from editing for
600:Transferred from
373:WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES
960:
950:
942:
871:
789:
785:
754:
690:
638:
584:
504:
411:
324:
283:
223:
177:
27:
968:
967:
963:
962:
961:
959:
958:
957:
956:
955:
945:
932:
925:
881:
870:
852:
799:
783:
779:
770:
748:
697:Downside School
693:Whitgift School
686:
632:
594:
583:
565:
503:
485:
410:
392:
320:
293:
282:
264:
222:
204:
176:
158:
92:
21:
12:
11:
5:
966:
964:
926:
891:You have been
890:
882:
880:
877:
876:
875:
859:
848:
847:
846:
798:
795:
769:
766:
765:
764:
724:
723:
722:
721:
673:
672:
649:
648:
609:
608:
607:
606:
593:
590:
589:
588:
572:
511:I found these
509:
508:
492:
426:and why is it
416:
415:
399:
292:
289:
288:
287:
271:
228:
227:
211:
165:
91:
88:
20:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
965:
954:
951:
949:
940:
936:
930:
923:
919:
917:
916:
909:
905:
901:
900:
896:
895:
886:
878:
874:
869:
867:
862:
858:
857:
849:
845:
841:
837:
833:
829:
825:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
812:
808:
804:
796:
794:
793:
790:
788:
782:
775:
767:
762:
758:
752:
746:
745:
744:
743:
739:
735:
732:
728:
720:
716:
713:
710:
706:
702:
698:
694:
689:
684:
680:
675:
674:
670:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
658:
654:
646:
642:
636:
630:
629:
628:
627:
623:
619:
615:
605:
603:
598:
597:
596:
595:
591:
587:
582:
580:
575:
571:
570:
563:
559:
554:
550:
549:
548:
547:
543:
539:
534:
532:
527:
526:
522:
521:
517:
516:
512:
507:
502:
500:
495:
491:
490:
483:
479:
475:
471:
466:
465:
464:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
414:
409:
407:
402:
398:
397:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
351:
349:
343:
342:
338:
335:
332:
328:
323:
317:
316:
312:
309:
306:
302:
298:
290:
286:
281:
279:
274:
270:
269:
261:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
245:
244:
240:
236:
233:
226:
221:
219:
214:
210:
209:
201:
197:
196:
195:
194:
190:
186:
181:
180:
175:
173:
168:
164:
163:
156:
152:
147:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
124:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
89:
87:
86:
82:
78:
73:
72:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
50:
47:
43:
39:
35:
31:
26:
19:December 2018
18:
16:
947:
938:
915:illegitimate
913:
911:
899:indefinitely
897:
892:
879:Block notice
865:
854:
800:
786:
780:
771:
725:
711:
701:Worth School
678:
656:
650:
621:
610:
599:
578:
567:
558:good article
535:
528:
523:
518:
513:
510:
498:
487:
473:
469:
449:
443:
427:
420:encyclopedic
419:
417:
405:
394:
384:
352:
344:
333:
318:
307:
294:
277:
266:
246:
229:
217:
206:
182:
171:
160:
148:
140:Ellen Street
125:
96:edit summary
93:
90:Edit summary
74:
60:
45:
22:
15:
836:Atlantic306
807:Atlantic306
319:Canvassing
49:Atlantic306
30:Atlantic306
28:Hello, I'm
946:Jezebel's
688:these five
369:WP:CANVASS
101:Fanny pack
832:WP:BEFORE
734:Nuksanhai
653:Nuksanhai
635:Nuksanhai
618:Nuksanhai
538:Nuksanhai
482:WP:BEFORE
454:Nuksanhai
432:Nuksanhai
389:WP:BEFORE
385:existence
354:Nuksanhai
322:like this
249:Nuksanhai
235:Nuksanhai
200:this edit
185:Nuksanhai
151:watchlist
77:Nuksanhai
63:Nuksanhai
42:Help Desk
937:|reason=
912:not for
751:RHaworth
727:RHaworth
715:contribs
705:RHaworth
474:anything
337:contribs
327:RHaworth
311:contribs
301:RHaworth
155:Teahouse
935:unblock
918:reasons
908:allowed
894:blocked
824:WP:PROD
803:WP:PROD
553:notable
428:notable
291:Schools
105:WP:BITE
38:sandbox
910:, but
856:Bilorv
828:WP:AFD
569:Bilorv
489:Bilorv
396:Bilorv
268:Bilorv
208:Bilorv
162:Bilorv
948:Ponyo
822:Read
781:Cesde
768:Email
757:Csgir
669:Csgir
641:Csgir
924:.
866:talk
840:talk
811:talk
797:Prod
774:this
761:talk
738:talk
709:talk
699:and
657:talk
645:talk
622:talk
579:talk
542:talk
499:talk
470:does
458:talk
436:talk
406:talk
358:talk
331:talk
305:talk
299:. —
278:talk
253:talk
239:talk
218:talk
189:talk
172:talk
121:here
117:here
113:here
111:and
109:here
81:talk
67:talk
53:talk
943:.
861:(c)
747:Hi
683:AfD
679:and
574:(c)
494:(c)
478:AFD
450:not
422:in
401:(c)
381:AFD
377:CSD
297:AfD
273:(c)
213:(c)
167:(c)
99:on
941:}}
933:{{
853:—
842:)
813:)
740:)
717:)
695:,
659:)
639:.
624:)
566:—
544:)
533:)
486:—
460:)
438:)
393:—
360:)
339:)
313:)
265:—
255:)
241:)
205:—
191:)
159:—
83:)
69:)
55:)
44:.
868:)
864:(
838:(
809:(
787:a
784:v
763:)
759:(
753::
749:@
736:(
712:·
707:(
655:(
647:)
643:(
637::
633:@
620:(
604:.
581:)
577:(
540:(
501:)
497:(
456:(
434:(
408:)
404:(
356:(
334:·
329:(
308:·
303:(
280:)
276:(
251:(
237:(
220:)
216:(
187:(
174:)
170:(
79:(
65:(
51:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
