184:
on whether or not it’s permissible during these 6 months for me to edit articles about middle eastern history. The activity around my topic ban was explicitly about Jewish theological matters, and would like to see if there is a clear line of demarcation we may establish, as I am concerned that “Judaism, broadly construed” may be excessively broad in a manner that may make editing on distant reasonably unconnected topics problematic.
44:
perspective. Is that not the case or do I need to steer clear of any article where the word Jew shows up? I did not write anything about
Judaism but about Ottoman Syria. The article is purely historical and my small edit was about Ottoman Syria as a historical entity. If that's an issue, let me know, and I can avoid that as well, but I didn't think it would be an issue.
149:
Just to be clear, violating a topic ban is absolutely a blockable offense. The fact I haven't blocked you doesn't mean someone else might not still come in here and do it, and if you violate it again it's almost a certainty you'll be blocked. Topic bans are difficult to navigate, and you're on really
134:
Sorry, I must have missed the part you bolded, thanks for letting me know. An article about demographics and history seemed to be outside the scope of the ban on writing on Jewish theology, but now I know and can avoid that too. My edits only revolve around history of the Middle East and architecture
183:
I’m still getting used to
Knowledge conventions and apologize for not understanding the rules at times. After taking some time away from Knowledge to learn its rules I realize that there’s room for improvement and I could have responded to feedback from you more productively. I would like your input
102:
As you're very new here, you're going to want to understand what is meant by broadly construed. It means you can't edit anything that touches on
Judaism at all. This is unfortunately a very broad topic, and it includes discussing the topic on talk pages or anywhere else. I strongly encourage you to
43:
Hi, there, I have no intention to violate any topic ban. From what I understood the ban is only on Jewish theological topics. I am avoiding theological subjects, but for what I understood I am permitted to write about the history of Israel and the history the Middle East from a historical
241:
is exactly why topic bans are so difficult to navigate. I'm afraid that until you successfully appeal, which you can't do until
October, you're best just not editing anywhere near anything to do with Judaism. As I said before, Middle Eastern history almost inherently includes Judaism.
220:
I was considering blocking you but didn't act after
Valereee came here, even though she said you might still be blocked. As you seem so unsure about what is and what is not encompassed by your topic ban, maybe you should avoid Middle Eastern topics all together.
164:
I apologize I did not mean to violate my ban. I will revert all of my recent edits out of an abundance of caution and will seek clarification from an admin on if its permissible for me to contribute to articles pertaining to the history of the Middle East.
115:
to do that you can simply open a new section and place {{Admin help}} in that section. An admin will be along shortly. That kind of discussion, here on your talk page with an admin you're seeking advice from, is the only exception to the topic
25:
150:
thin ice. If I were you, I'd be avoiding the history of the middle east altogether at this point. You almost can't avoid editing around
Judaism if you're editing in that area.
202:
so I cannot provide clarification. I will say topic bans are generally broader than the exact limits of where the current disruption was happening.
239:“Judaism, broadly construed” may be excessively broad in a manner that may make editing on distant reasonably unconnected topics problematic
59:
207:
66:
and even if it were not broadly construed, your edits there certainly seem like they're within the spirit of the topic ban.
63:
120:
Can we talk about why you didn't ask for advice, even though you'd reminded yourself of this less than 24 hours ago?
203:
180:
217:
185:
166:
136:
95:
81:
45:
21:
227:
109:
If you're in any doubt at all whether editing a topic might violate your topic ban, come back in here
247:
199:
155:
125:
71:
33:
222:
216:
I agree, It's normal for the topic ban to be wider than the particular issues involved. @
243:
151:
121:
67:
29:
251:
230:
211:
193:
174:
159:
144:
129:
89:
75:
53:
37:
238:
107:
101:
135:
now, where I can still add value. Hope all is well! All the best.
103:
go edit architecture topics; stay away from synagogues etc.
80:
I didn't realize that, feel free to delete what I wrote.
62:
it's "Judaism, broadly construed.". That would include
98:, which you deleted less than 24 hours ago. It said
8:
7:
24:appeares to be a violation of your
14:
113:and ask for advice from an admin;
94:Okay, I'm going to ask you about
1:
64:Jewish population by country
284:
252:20:31, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
231:09:40, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
212:20:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
194:19:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
189:
175:18:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
170:
160:11:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
145:02:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
140:
130:22:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
90:20:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
85:
76:19:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
54:18:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
49:
38:18:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
204:ScottishFinnishRadish
181:ScottishFinnishRadish
28:. Can you explain?
218:Nycarchitecture212
186:Nycarchitecture212
167:Nycarchitecture212
137:Nycarchitecture212
82:Nycarchitecture212
46:Nycarchitecture212
275:
240:
225:
117:
104:
283:
282:
278:
277:
276:
274:
273:
272:
223:
19:
12:
11:
5:
281:
279:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
235:
234:
233:
118:
105:
99:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
280:
253:
249:
245:
236:
232:
229:
226:
219:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
196:
195:
191:
187:
182:
178:
177:
176:
172:
168:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
148:
147:
146:
142:
138:
133:
132:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
112:
106:
100:
97:
93:
92:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
77:
73:
69:
65:
61:
58:According to
57:
56:
55:
51:
47:
42:
41:
40:
39:
35:
31:
27:
23:
16:
110:
108:
20:
224:Doug Weller
200:WP:INVOLVED
26:topic ban
244:Valereee
152:Valereee
122:Valereee
68:Valereee
30:Valereee
237:NYCa,
198:I am
111:first
17:t-ban
248:talk
228:talk
208:talk
190:talk
179:Hi @
171:talk
156:talk
141:talk
126:talk
116:ban.
96:this
86:talk
72:talk
60:this
50:talk
34:talk
22:This
250:)
210:)
192:)
173:)
158:)
143:)
128:)
88:)
74:)
52:)
36:)
246:(
206:(
188:(
169:(
154:(
139:(
124:(
84:(
70:(
48:(
32:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.