26:
just adding it in without any discussion. It makes sense to say something about
Pakistan/anti-AQ efforts at some point I think, but this is obviously a very controversial article and you do not currently have consensus for your addition. One problem with it is that it only includes comments from the administration (which are unsurprisingly positive) so there is an NPOV issue. Beyond that though, as I said in general on Obama's article it's better to discuss changes on talk before making them. --
52:
25:
edit? I've already reverted you once and do not want to edit war, but there's a good chance someone will revert this eventually. There is some discussion on the talk page about expanding the section on the presidency, and it's probably a good idea for you to talk about your proposed addition rather
81:
101:
36:
69:
59:
97:
32:
65:
92:
27:
75:
51:
105:
40:
50:
88:
22:
68:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
8:
7:
14:
80:below, but you should read our
1:
66:abuse of editing privileges
21:Would you consider undoing
121:
106:21:35, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
64:from editing for repeated
41:17:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
82:guide to appealing blocks
91:for full explanation.--
55:
54:
78:|Your reason here}}
72:by adding the text
70:contest this block
56:
104:
39:
112:
95:
30:
120:
119:
115:
114:
113:
111:
110:
109:
85:
48:
19:
12:
11:
5:
118:
116:
79:
57:You have been
49:
47:
44:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
117:
108:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
83:
77:
73:
71:
67:
63:
61:
53:
45:
43:
42:
38:
34:
29:
24:
16:
93:Bigtimepeace
86:
62:indefinitely
58:
28:Bigtimepeace
20:
87:Please see
17:Obama edit
102:contribs
37:contribs
84:first.
76:unblock
60:blocked
46:Blocked
98:talk
89:here
33:talk
23:this
100:|
35:|
96:|
74:{{
31:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
