819:
657:
522:
contraction) and the one used in wikipedia is part of the reason for the merger. Having the overall category of strength training would allow the differences between the different types of strength training to be highlighted and contrasted, clearing up the confusion between the two types of resistance training and allowing comparison of the different effects of each type of training. Whaddya think?
459:
comments in the MfD, but didn't know the term. What I find really curious is why
Hillman hasn't been blocked yet. His response to David on his own talk page is another clear violation of WP:STALK. He has done the same thing on several other talk pages, btw. Anyhow, I did want to let you know how nice it was to hear some productive comments rising above all the noise.
373:
as it treated the non-official version as if its adherents were members of the flat earth society. I believe the rewrite is much more readable now and the narrative is more connected. I'm certain it has it faults but it seems to be a better foundation to work from than the older version. Please take a look and make any comments you like on the Talk page. Thanks!
95:
even got a message from an administrator about it on my User:Talk page. I responded to the administrator and am waiting to hear back. In the meantime, I thought you might take a look at the entry and the Talk page that discusses Able Danger (in more than one place). I would appreciate hearing your point of view.
372:
have made the non-official view that Saddam and Osama did have a cooperative relationship much more persuasive. In fact, former
Democrat Senator and 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey now believes they did cooperate, showing this is a tenable position. The older version of the article is clearly not NPOV
94:
regarding Able Danger deleted several times by people claiming it is not relevant to the article. This is hogwash, of course. I have expanded the entry over time to make it more clear and show the relevance to the article. Still it is deleted. Now they are saying I should not violate the 3RR. I
458:
I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate your rational voice in the MfD. I have no idea why
Hillman is carrying on about me the way he/she/it is, but your suggestion of a "breaching experiment" is an interesting one and what I was alluding to as an "experiment in social psychology" in my own
439:
Hi, Obsidian, I just noticed your comment on these elsewhere, so no doubt you will want to participate in this MfD. I actually agree with your concern. Did you notice that the subpages under MfD were created in connection with my on-going attempt to formulate and propose policies governing things
390:
The
Knowledge article on "Stochastic Electrodynamics" has been converted by a Chris Hillman into primarily an attack on myself and my colleague Prof. Alfonso Rueda. The field of Stochastic Electrodynamcis itself, which has had 40 years of development by numerous physicists, is hardly discusssed at
558:
Hello OO. I've archived the discussion on the new outline for cold fusion. Please feel free to bring it back if you believe it should. Here are my 2 cents. I would recommend that you make the case for changing the current structure: what's wrong with it ? How would the new outline improve it.
294:
O.O., this anonymous user is engaging in taqiyya. There is no reason to apologize for misconstruing him. His hardly-hidden agenda is that Islam mandates
Islamism, and that others are being intolerant of Muslims if they reject the imposition of Sharia. Please ignore his threats, as you've done
397:
Since you, ObsidianOrder, have made numerous excellent comments and arguments on the SED Talk, I would just like to urge you to translate some of these into edits of the SED page. It looks to me like
Christine Hillman has been getting a free ride in spite of numerous problems with what she has
40:
Just want to make a point about your vote (and don't want to clutter the already over-cluttered voting page). I don't think most of us voting to delete this project have any interest in "censoring" these people. They are free to say whatever they like on their user pages. However, creating a
604:
article to the GA level. In this process, there are still several issues, which should be done before renominating this article for GAN. As you have contributed to the article and/or discussion, you may be interested to participate in the discussion about the article improvement. Thank you.
521:
as used now is in the sense of resistance provided by elastic tension or water, not in the broader sense of any resistance to the contraction of muscle (through weights, elastic, structure in isometrics, etc). The confusion between the broader definition of resistance (anything to resist
51:
The project specifically states that this is their aim, and that any other concerns (e.g. legal implications in
Florida) are secondary. No, this is not censorship, this is enforcement of Knowledge rules and guidelines. If censorship is your concern, you should probably vote
543:
I've finished as much of the merger of weight training as possible, I'd love comments. Mostly what I did was take out the info that was duplicated in strength training and tried to highlight how weight training differs from the other types of strength training. Help!
440:
like wikishilling and digging? I feel it is hard to do the former without being able to present evidence that wikishilling is a problem. As for the latter, please see my (still unfinished) essay describing my preliminary thoughts about the problems posed by digging at
45:
about the nature of morality or decency is against site policy. A VFD would be raised for any WikiProject of the sort, regardless of their moral standpoint (e.g. they might want to remove all obscene photos of women, defined as those that show women without traditional
683:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
203:
debate has gotten beyond my expertise, so I really can't contribute to it - but I will say that getting Edmund Storms, who has long been a very public advocate of cold-fusion claims, seems a poor way to go about it, any more than getting
777:
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
687:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
723:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
29:
262:
Hey... I don’t know if you have any interest in this subject anymore, but there is yet another attempt to bury the
Islamofascism page elsewhere. If you’re interested, the debate is here:
139:
and possibly help me turn it into a real article? You seem to have some wikipedia experience as well as a grasp of some of the non-thermal interaction issues. Thanks in advance,
433:
478:
345:
155:
Hey, thanks for creating that awesome bibliography! I've been intending to do some research on SED for sometime; you've made it all the more easier. --
669:
245:
Which is current? Despite my avowed intention not to contribute to this process, I have noticed some minor errors and I feel compelled to fix them.
135:
Hi, I saw some of the work you've been doing at some of the bioelectromagnetism and EMF hazard pages, and was wondering if you could take a look at
368:
and help moderate the controversy. As you know, this is a controversial article that has been the subject of many edit wars. Recently translated
680:
882:
748:
330:
OO, you probably are much more qualified than me to fill the theory section of that article. Would you be kind enough to take a chance ?
474:
636:
369:
115:
218:
I think it would be an excellent idea to get Bob Park to contribute to the cold fusion article. I would be thrilled to see that. --
17:
496:
73:
BYT put my article on this informative book up for VfD,I'd be honored if you'd take a look at the article and its VfD. Thanks.
744:
67:
886:
624:
Hi. I noticed you haven't edited in a long time, but if you are still around
Knowledge, there is a discussion on whether
861:
735:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
874:
830:
808:
740:
394:
We need to involve a knowledgeable neutral editor, and it would be best to remove the article until this can be done.
365:
358:
324:
274:
91:
444:(but to avoid fragmenting discussion, please comment on that in my user talk page or in the MfD as appropriate). ---
878:
826:
812:
771:
758:
149:
781:
Please also consider updating other files you created or uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created
673:
174:
184:
Ok, done. I think you're way out of line removing the disputed tag, though. Can we at least discuss this?
441:
387:
I sent the following to Knowledge "management" and don't know whether this will result in any assistance.
559:
Also, make your change in the article itself, rather than in a temporary page: you'll get more feedback.
313:
page. There are some interesting quotes there that certain editors do not want readers to know about.
798:
693:
890:
736:
625:
518:
136:
540:
give them more rope, and more shovels. let simmer a few months. then sit back and enjoy the show.
481:. But I sincerely can't make prophecies what will happen at RfAr with such an mother-of-all-RfAr.
477:. On its merits alone it probably will not be accepted. You may want to argue about inclusion in
296:
185:
140:
74:
391:
all. The current version is littered with factual errors, misattributions and NPOV violations.
898:
857:
712:
703:
412:
I'm not sure that was such a great solution either. I had posted on Deenoe's page about it.--
209:
732:
716:
633:
610:
586:
423:
413:
249:
219:
731:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
495:
I also invite you to check my attempt for a united position statement of the mainstreamers
794:
788:
689:
632:
should be merged. My position is mostly neutral. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks.
574:
310:
116:
Knowledge:Categories for deletion#Category:Soviet spies to Category:Alleged Soviet spies
728:
720:
601:
578:
42:
240:
844:
724:
560:
398:
written. I am tryiing to avoid stepping in directly myself in deference to WP policy.
331:
265:
156:
77:
498:. Ironically none of the mainstreamers have commented so far, perhaps I'm too soft?
894:
629:
501:
445:
374:
314:
96:
843:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
606:
582:
485:
399:
200:
170:
119:
57:
28:
Not sure what you'll vote on this, but if you're interested, bark at this one:
33:
902:
802:
752:
697:
641:
614:
590:
563:
548:
535:
526:
504:
463:
448:
426:
416:
402:
377:
352:
334:
317:
299:
284:
281:
268:
252:
222:
212:
188:
177:
159:
143:
122:
99:
80:
60:
484:
On the other hand, I pretty much assume, we can constructively proceed at
545:
532:
523:
460:
349:
205:
664:
648:
510:
Merge of weight training, strength training and resistance training
488:, once some reasonable, experienced non-mainstreamers arrive, e.g.
235:
719:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
30:
Knowledge:Votes for deletion/WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency
838:
Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons
817:
581:
article, which you created. Your comment is appreciated.
475:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration#Cold_Fusion_Censorship
573:
Merry Christmas, ObsidianOrder! I proposed to merge the
885:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
867:
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing
782:
662:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
850:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
241:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User:ObsidianOrder/Cold_fusion
56:. Thanks for contributing, and good editing to you! -
668:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
422:
I think it's done.. it was easier than I thought.--
600:Hi, ObsidianOrder. There is a plan to improve the
434:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hillman/Dig
173:. Please revert yourself quickly or get reported.
711:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
531:So you've changed your mind on the merger then?
114:If you got a minute can you take a look. Thanks
479:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience
232:You have two versions of your proposed article:
346:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Commodore Sloat
8:
473:There is another RFAr in statu nascendi at
517:A note regarding the merger of RT et al.
309:Please take a look at recent edits on the
280:(I answered your question on this page.)
681:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Rentech
68:The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism
856:notice, but please explain why in your
236:http://en.wikipedia.org/Cold_fusion/tmp
787:If you have any questions, please see
7:
620:Bioelectromagnetics and biomagnetism
670:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
364:Please review the rewrite I did on
228:Which CF article is the manuscript?
845:deleted for any of several reasons
833:because of the following concern:
14:
870:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
853:{{proposed deletion/dated files}}
737:review the candidates' statements
679:The article will be discussed at
370:Operation Iraqi Freedom documents
768:The media file you uploaded as:
655:
275:Category talk:To do, by priority
41:WikiProject aimed at imposing a
18:User_talk:ObsidianOrder/Archive1
743:. For the Election committee,
713:Arbitration Committee election
704:ArbCom elections are now open!
569:Synthetic crude/Synthetic fuel
1:
903:08:42, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
827:File:Cellphone head sar 2.png
813:File:Cellphone head sar 2.png
803:11:58, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
772:File:Cellphone head sar 2.png
759:File:Cellphone head sar 2.png
753:12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
591:08:13, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
549:02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
323:theoretical explanations for
160:04:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
100:01:27, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
81:07:43, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
36:10:39, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
698:03:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
564:09:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
536:10:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
527:22:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
505:20:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
350:Torturous Devastating Cudgel
325:low energy nuclear reactions
269:19:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
258:Islamofascism redirect again
253:20:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
223:20:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
144:11:05, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
123:01:40, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
889:allows discussion to reach
761:missing description details
739:and submit your choices on
554:new outline for cold fusion
383:Message from Bernard Haisch
366:Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda
359:Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda
344:There is an Rfc on Csloat.
213:21:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
189:16:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
178:16:07, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
92:Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda
61:13:31, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
918:
881:exist. In particular, the
745:MediaWiki message delivery
642:04:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
464:14:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
318:13:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
150:Stochastic electrodynamics
875:proposed deletion process
615:07:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
449:00:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
427:06:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
417:05:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
403:22:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
378:05:49, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
353:21:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
300:09:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
285:03:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
169:You've broken the 3RR on
672:or whether it should be
335:10:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
208:to write it would be! -
90:I have had an entry on
841:
822:
835:
831:proposed for deletion
821:
717:Arbitration Committee
86:Dispute advice needed
887:files for discussion
862:the file's talk page
454:Breaching Experiment
442:User:Hillman/Digging
305:Michael Scheuer page
175:William M. Connolley
721:arbitration process
626:bioelectromagnetics
519:Resistance training
137:bioelectromagnetics
131:Bioelectromagnetics
110:If you got a minute
879:deletion processes
823:
783:in your upload log
733:arbitration policy
514:Hi ObsidianOrder,
75:User:Klonimus/AINB
809:Proposed deletion
909:
872:
871:
855:
854:
820:
659:
658:
639:
917:
916:
912:
911:
910:
908:
907:
906:
883:speedy deletion
869:
868:
852:
851:
818:
816:
792:
789:Help:Image page
763:
741:the voting page
707:
660:
656:
653:
637:
622:
598:
577:article to the
575:Synthetic crude
571:
556:
512:
471:
456:
437:
410:
408:2006 Page O Fun
385:
362:
342:
328:
311:Michael Scheuer
307:
292:
278:
260:
230:
197:
167:
153:
133:
112:
107:
88:
71:
26:
12:
11:
5:
915:
913:
893:for deletion.
873:will stop the
815:
806:
775:
774:
766:Dear uploader:
764:
762:
756:
710:
706:
701:
654:
652:
647:Nomination of
645:
621:
618:
602:Synthetic fuel
597:
596:Synthetic fuel
594:
579:Synthetic fuel
570:
567:
555:
552:
511:
508:
470:
469:Hi disagreeer!
467:
455:
452:
436:
431:
430:
429:
409:
406:
384:
381:
361:
356:
341:
338:
327:
321:
306:
303:
295:nothing wrong.
291:
288:
277:
272:
259:
256:
229:
226:
217:
196:
193:
192:
191:
166:
163:
152:
147:
132:
129:
127:
111:
108:
106:
103:
87:
84:
70:
65:
64:
63:
48:
47:
46:head-scarves).
25:
22:
21:
20:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
914:
905:
904:
900:
896:
892:
888:
884:
880:
876:
865:
863:
859:
848:
846:
840:
839:
834:
832:
828:
814:
810:
807:
805:
804:
800:
796:
790:
786:
784:
779:
773:
770:
769:
767:
760:
757:
755:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
705:
702:
700:
699:
695:
691:
685:
682:
677:
675:
671:
667:
666:
650:
646:
644:
643:
640:
635:
631:
627:
619:
617:
616:
612:
608:
603:
595:
593:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
568:
566:
565:
562:
553:
551:
550:
547:
541:
538:
537:
534:
529:
528:
525:
520:
515:
509:
507:
506:
503:
499:
497:
493:
491:
487:
482:
480:
476:
468:
466:
465:
462:
453:
451:
450:
447:
443:
435:
432:
428:
425:
421:
420:
419:
418:
415:
407:
405:
404:
401:
395:
392:
388:
382:
380:
379:
376:
371:
367:
360:
357:
355:
354:
351:
347:
339:
337:
336:
333:
326:
322:
320:
319:
316:
312:
304:
302:
301:
298:
297:Timothy Usher
290:Islamism page
289:
287:
286:
283:
276:
273:
271:
270:
267:
263:
257:
255:
254:
251:
246:
243:
242:
238:
237:
233:
227:
225:
224:
221:
215:
214:
211:
207:
202:
194:
190:
187:
186:ObsidianOrder
183:
182:
181:
179:
176:
172:
164:
162:
161:
158:
151:
148:
146:
145:
142:
141:Potatophysics
138:
130:
128:
125:
124:
121:
117:
109:
104:
102:
101:
98:
93:
85:
83:
82:
79:
76:
69:
66:
62:
59:
55:
50:
49:
44:
43:point of view
39:
38:
37:
35:
31:
23:
19:
16:
15:
877:, but other
866:
858:edit summary
849:
842:
837:
836:
824:
793:
791:. Thank you.
780:
776:
765:
708:
686:
678:
663:
661:
651:for deletion
630:biomagnetism
623:
599:
572:
557:
542:
539:
530:
516:
513:
500:
494:
489:
483:
472:
457:
438:
411:
396:
393:
389:
386:
363:
343:
329:
308:
293:
279:
261:
247:
244:
239:
234:
231:
216:
210:DavidWBrooks
198:
168:
154:
134:
126:
113:
89:
72:
53:
27:
486:Cold fusion
424:Paraphelion
414:Paraphelion
250:JedRothwell
220:JedRothwell
201:cold fusion
195:cold fusion
171:cold fusion
795:Sfan00 IMG
729:topic bans
690:CorporateM
891:consensus
829:has been
825:The file
725:site bans
634:Sidelight
165:3rr on CF
561:Pcarbonn
332:Pcarbonn
266:IronDuke
206:Bob Park
157:Intangir
78:Klonimus
895:Salavat
674:deleted
665:Rentech
649:Rentech
502:Pjacobi
375:RonCram
315:RonCram
97:RonCram
54:userify
860:or on
715:. The
607:Beagel
583:Beagel
400:Haisch
58:Harmil
34:MONGO
899:talk
799:talk
749:talk
694:Talk
628:and
611:talk
587:talk
282:EdGl
199:The
120:nobs
811:of
709:Hi,
546:WLU
533:WLU
524:WLU
490:you
461:DrL
340:RfC
118:.
105:CfC
24:Vfd
901:)
864:.
847:.
801:)
785:.
751:)
727:,
696:)
676:.
638:12
613:)
589:)
492:.
446:CH
348:.
264:]
248:--
180:.
32:--
897:(
797:(
747:(
692:(
609:(
585:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.