152:'s article seems to have the same issues, and judging from the history of edits, and the pattern those edits have, I'd guess that Dr. Lightman is editing his own article, as well. The fault really isn't his, or yours for assuming that's okay, I think the fault lies within the lack of instruction given to new editors, unless they do something wrong, or they take the time to do some serious reading into the Help pages. And, there really is not much that can be done about that, which is why there are editors like myself, who do what we call "Recent Changes Patrol". This way, we can flag articles for possible problems, advise new article authors, and when needed, revert vandalism.
132:
Stargate, I bought it when it was first released, and it is one of those books I read over and over again.) I will continue work, but the article needs some reliable third party references, so if you are Dr. Odenwald, then it would be very helpful if you could list any publications (such as newspapers, periodicals, journals, etc.) that could be used as references. And, as I mentioned above, I'd be more than happy to collaborate on this article with you, so please feel free to respond here, or to contact me via my talk page by clicking on my last name. Thank you, (and again, welcome!)
163:
your answers onto my own website's
Astronomy section. Small world, eh?) So, I'll do some digging with Google, and if you happen to keep a list of the publications you've been in, that would most definitely help. I think as far as the journal publications, they are really superfluous, simply due to the sheer volume of them. They definitely deserve a mention though, such as "Dr. Odenwald has been published widely in Scientific journals, such as ..." and then list 4-5. Best to list the major ones, as we'd likely have a Knowledge article about the journal we could link to.
144:
interview you've done out there we could use as a reference for some "personal background" story, that would really give the article some depth. First though, we will definitely need to get some good references for the main things, these being: Educational history, Career history, and the projects you work on. I'm more than sure that you've been interviewed a number of times, so perhaps you can point me in the direction of some articles that would help. Regarding the
51:, specifically with what seems to be a mostly CV/Resume-oriented article. If you are indeed, the subject of the article, then I would request that you move the information you've added into the article's talk page, and request a neutral, third party editor review it, and add it to the article in the proper format, using the proper
166:
So, while I'm sure you're quite busy, I'll await your reply, and please feel free to reply here if you like, as the conversations can remain on one page, thus eliminating the fragmentation that can happen when using two talk pages. I'll have this on my "watched" list, and see when you've updated it.
143:
Dr. Odenwald, thank you for getting back to me so quickly! As you probably have noticed, I did indeed trim quite a bit of what we here on
Knowledge, call "cruft", as it is most likely not verifiable (such as the stories of you and your father, your childhood hobbies, etc.). However, if there is an
162:
Now, let's get down to work! I've trimmed so much from the article that it is bare bones, basically the facts, and we need to get it filled out to reflect your personality a bit better! (Ironically, when you first created Ask The
Astronomer, I communicated with you regarding adding a selection of
182:
as soon as you can, or it risks being deleted. Knowledge is pretty firm on copyright issues, so photos that have no copyright rationale are gone fairly quickly (7 days). If you took the picture, or if you own the rights to it, it shouldn't be a problem. If it is a book jacket photo, there may be
131:
Dear
Odenwald, I have gone ahead and worked on the article, properly formatting it, removing irrelevant items that are considered "commentary", and formatting the "Books" section into prose, with properly formatted citations. (In a twist of Irony, I happen to own a copy of Stepping Through the
71:, and references written by the subject should generally be avoided, and instead incorporated, if relevant, within the article itself. I'd appreciate your response to this message here, simply click the "Edit" link, or the + tab at the top to discuss the issues. Thank you,
183:
issues with needing the permission of the publisher, the truth is I'm not deeply familiar with the image tags, so I'd just recommend that you read the links over on the photo to determine what tag is the proper one. Hope that helps,
62:
I am a member of the
Knowledge Project Space, and I would be happy to assist you in creating a neutral, non-biased article, as this person does indeed seem to satisfy the notability requirement, but the article lacks valid
94:
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
86:. Knowledge gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an
148:
policy, while it mostly pertains to negative unsourced statements, it really is a very firm policy that biographies have reliable sources, and I'm also sure you understand. Unfortunately,
32:
policy, which states that you should not edit or create articles about yourself, your family, or friends, or company affiliations, as you would be unable to edit them
118:
91:
107:
87:
117:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at
102:
155:
All of that aside, I do think that if you speak to Dr. Lightman, you may wish to relate the importance of the
179:
83:
44:
28:
Dear
Odenwald, I noticed you created the above article, and I'd like to have you review the
114:
52:
33:
156:
149:
145:
125:
68:
56:
48:
29:
22:
64:
37:
159:
policy, as it is a pretty serious one (for reasons I'm sure you can understand).
67:. Articles about living persons have very strict policy guidelines, as covered in
184:
168:
133:
72:
40:
of
Knowledge, and I'd respectfully request that you review them all.
98:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
178:
You'll need to get the copyright information on your photo,
43:Another policy that you need to be aware of is the
8:
47:policy. In addition, I'd like you to review
78:License tagging for Image:StenOdenwald.jpg
167:And I hope you have a wonderful day!
7:
119:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
14:
113:This is an automated notice by
121:. 21:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
108:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
1:
146:biographies of living persons
69:Biographies of living persons
65:reliable third-party sources
185:20:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
169:20:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
134:22:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
73:20:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
36:. Neutrality is one of the
200:
103:Knowledge:Image use policy
57:Knowledge manual of style
180:Image:StenOdenwald.jpg
92:image description page
84:Image:StenOdenwald.jpg
174:Oh, photograph issues
82:Thanks for uploading
49:what Knowledge is not
157:Conflict of Interest
30:conflict of interest
191:
199:
198:
194:
193:
192:
190:
189:
188:
176:
141:
129:
90:applied to the
80:
26:
19:
12:
11:
5:
197:
195:
175:
172:
140:
137:
128:
123:
111:
110:
105:
79:
76:
53:citation style
25:
20:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
196:
187:
186:
181:
173:
171:
170:
164:
160:
158:
153:
151:
150:Alan Lightman
147:
138:
136:
135:
127:
126:Sten Odenwald
124:
122:
120:
116:
109:
106:
104:
101:
100:
99:
96:
93:
89:
85:
77:
75:
74:
70:
66:
60:
58:
55:, as per the
54:
50:
46:
41:
39:
38:core policies
35:
31:
24:
23:Sten Odenwald
21:
16:
177:
165:
161:
154:
142:
130:
112:
97:
81:
61:
42:
27:
17:August 2007
45:notability
139:Thank you
115:OrphanBot
88:image tag
34:neutrally
59:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.