User talk:Ohnoitsjamie/archive6

759:, trying to implement the standard format established by the other Caribbean island articles, while also attempting to get it in shape for the featured article selection process. But I'm really concerned about the standard established for the "External links" sections. The problem is not as acute in the Nevis article as it is in articles about larger and more popular island destinations, but it may only be a question of time. Right now, for example, there is a single-use account adding a personal site with a promotional description added (or search engine kick-line), that repeats the words "Nevis" and "guide" twice and adds the line "over 300 pages, 15 years in operation". Although a rather large portion of the site consists of paid advertisement for villa rentals, pictures of hotels, CD covers, guide books for sale through Amazondotcom, etc etc, along with rather large Google ad sections, the site has some merit as an essay-type, personal travel account by a frequent visitor to the island. Because of this, I only replaced the promotional description of the link when it first appeared, leaving the link itself. But the promotional kick-line keeps being reinserted by one user ( 763:), a single use account that seems to exist only for the purpose of promoting this link, which finally led other editors to just remove the link altogether. And now it has become a revert war situation, which is making the article unstable. My point is: If the no-spam policy included a line about a Knowledge (XXG) preference for officially endorsed, government tourism department websites only in articles about popular tourist destinations, this problem would go away. But once an external link category called "Tourism" exists, as a separate entity from "Official links", it will continue to be seen as an open invitation to spam Knowledge (XXG) with pages about how to book a hotel and how to rent a car, etc. One side of this problem is instability: More aggresive site owners are deleting the other's links in order to be the one only one or the top link in the Tourism section. Another problem is that "Tourism" is such an open-ended category with the potential to grow out of control. What to do in the Nevis article and where to discuss suggested changes? Any suggestions? Best wishes, 1525:

away a free program and have many useful resources. Furthermore, and more importantly, the subject of the most of the wiki is those very programs. Therefore, the link would be useful to show what the programs are, since it is helpful for someone to be able to see what is being talked about in the wiki. I mean at one point the wiki says they can be found online, why should there not be an easy link following that that says where they can be found online. It is not spam because it literally is the subject of a good portion of the wiki, or at least 90% of it until it talks about other recent SAT calculator programs. Try ipod's wiki or many others for examples of relevant links to websites that sell products (but keep in mind that this site also has a free program and other resources).

755:"Tourism" in geography related articles, especially in articles about popular tourist destinations. That category is a magnet for spam links, a virtual invitation to advertisers; it is attracting "info" from sites that exist primarily to generate commission for hotel referals or reservations, from tour operators and villa rental agencies (who often try to appear inconspicuous on Knowledge (XXG) by linking to their "General destination facts" section), from car rental places and general booking agents masquerading as "official travel guides", etc, etc. I've been working on one such tourist destination article for a while now, 648:(the focus of Knowledge (XXG) should always be adding content, not links). Of the few you noted, I'd be included to leave the csuchico.edu link; I rarely remove links from educational institutions, non-profits, or government sources, as there's no commercial conflict-of-interest. Commercial links are accepted by editors in some instances if the links are from a very notable source and/or provide a extensive/high-quality content. Again, there is no litmus test for "high qualility/extensive"; decisions are made by individuals or by group consensus in the case of a disagreement. 32:

trying to vandalize anything, on the contrary, I happened to come across the page, and noticed an obvious error, namely a claim that only one magazine is dedicated to Boutique Hotels. That is not true. i made a reference to our own (printed) magazine, and also included a link to our website, where the electronic version of the magazine can be downloaded, free of charge. Instead of reverting to a version with incorrect information, you might have taken the time to investigate what you were erasing, or at least explain what in my actions you found offensive.

799:

discussion board of course. The work by the project participants there to standardize the Caribbean articles has been very successful and has greatly improved a number of articles, so I think it's important not to make drastic changes to the categories they have established. Then again, it just doesn't seem fair to place so much on the shoulders of the spam patrollers, if a simple guideline could circumvent the spammers. Jamie, thanks for working so hard and being willing to help out with sticky issues. Much appreciated. Best wishes,

1330:

those links, and replaced them with external links to non-commercial websites of purely informational nature such as HUD (Department of Housing and Urban Development) and the Department of Veterans Affairs. These sites are purely informational, an are definitionally not spam, as they are government websites created specifically to provide information on refinance. I also added reference links to the sites I used for references when writing the article in the first place, as I believe I am not only supposed to but required to do.

2919:==Hello Jamie, I reviewed the spam policies. I posted an external link to a company called Phone Sherpa (I'm not affiliated) because I have tried several of these service and this was the only one that seemed to work as advertised. I think ringtone makers are big news but I realize that my first post was over enthusiastic and not neutral and I put more than one link which I should have seen and edited out. Here's an edited version I'd like to post. Please let me know what you think: 1338:

I placed on that site was informational-only, mostly to .gov and .org websites. The only .com reference link I used was to a consumer advocacy site I often consult, which does not sell anything even remotely related to refinancing. In fact the article itself was a detailed discussion of the pros and cons associated with this sort of thing. If the original links currently on the page are not spam, then I can't conceive of how HUD public service articles and risk assessments are.

1591:"official site" for them. Links are and can be to sites that sell products, as long as the site is relevant to the article (again try ipod etc), and especially if the website offers free items (the free program from the site, resources, or simply a better understanding of how such a program would work). So again, please show me why a link should not be included to the website, because everything I can find says that the link should in fact be included. 1334:

appear on the page's history), informed me that I did not cite sufficiently authoritative websites in generating these references, and SPECIFICALLY asked me to locate government-run websites such as HUD or the VA and use THOSE as references. I only just found the time to do so, only to have my additions instantly removed for the very same reason I was told to put them up in the first place, and actual SPAM LINKS put in their place. Imagine my surprise.

337:. The new user tossed out a bunch because I put a tag on the last sentence in that section. The rest is widely accepted, but would you review that last one to see if it can stand on its own? Maybe I'm being too sensitive about what we can assert vs. what needs a cite. If you think it's ok, I'm good with it, it just seemed to fall into the latter category rather than the former. Thanks for your time either way : ) 2435:==DinoFun Hello, I'm not sure why you are deleting the DinoFun link. It is not a commercial website and everything on it is free. I have had this website for years and it is totally non-profit. I believe that kids learn quite a bit about dinosaurs while playing these games. Also I believe it is properly categorized under EXTERNAL-CHILDRENS-DINOSAURS. What other place could it be listed under. Thank you, Tosoft 1470:

so far a couple of users have in fact thought that a link to the site would be useful. Then out of the blue you warn me to stop pushing the site? I did exactly what you told me to do, I have not posted another link to the site, and have only asked for opinions. How is posting a message in the discussion area asking if users think a link to the site is relevant against any rules?

986: 822: 432:, I won't object, but those are probably the only articles that are highly relevant to the content. You could also post a query to the talk pages to those article asking others if they think the links are worth adding. Articles related to anxiety and depression can quickly accumlate way too many links, so we try to limit them to highly relevant and/or notable sources. Cheers, 2928:

are often supported; they must be downloaded to the phone before they can be used as a normal ring tone. Commercial ring tones take advantage of this functionality, which has led to the success of the mobile music industry. Southern rapper Chamillionaire was the first to have a ring tone go 3x platinum for the hit single "Ridin." He now has his own category on certain phones.

2743: 2750: 2923:

CD etc.) and upload directly to their mobile phone with no limit on the number of songs uploaded. In addition to the cost benefits, a key feature is the music editor that lets the user easily pick the part of the song they wish to set as a ringtone. The service automatically detects the phone settings to ensure the best file type and format.

1247:(1) The site is non-commercial (2) It does not sell anything (3) It does provide more content to the subject (4) It does cite sources, in fact I counted 69 source references in the article (5) It is not a spam site (6) It contains an opinion you probably disagree with and prefer to censor (7) That is all the more reason it should be listed. 2309:

funny that you remove any comments from your talk page whenever someone confronts you about something you did wrong. Not to mention you indefinitely block them as soon as you remove anything they added to the talk page. We're all on to you, so I suggest you shape up. So, listen here, YOU WILL STOP THIS CRAP RIGHT NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND ME?

1872:

actually quite sure what page it was that was vandalized by my friend, but I hope that it could be reverted, he told me about what he had done when I regained possession of my computer (as I had lent it to him previously). Again, I apologize and hope that this is the right place to do so and that this message finds you.

2152:; I don't dispute that the term marijuana is less popular than Cannabis in the U.K.; doing a Google search limited to the UK domain for marijuana yields over 200,000 hits, while a similar search for "cannabis" yields over 900,000. (Doing the same thing for .au sites yields 300k+ hits and 200k+ hits, respectively). 2922:

Proposed addition: Newer mobile phones allow the users to associate different ring tones for different phone book entries. Taking advantage of these features, a new Ringtone Maker trend has emerged. For example, websites like Phone Sherpa let users make ringtones from the music they already own (MP3,

2132:

Marijuana is a North American slang term for cannabis, so please dont add it to any cannabis articles when what you mean to say is cannabis. If I added weed or blow whenevr I editeded the cannabis articles you can imagine the chaos that would bring. So please dont use this slang term instead of the

1938:

I also noticed you have tons of links with no references whatsoever of course. Christ-mass is currently a controversial subject in America. The other side of this debate has a right to be heard and represents millions of diverse American opinions from Pagan to Atheist to Jewish to Muslim to Biblical

1728:

You recently removed some of the links I added. I was wondering how they were inappropriate: I added links to outside sources that provdied citation for the areas in the articles that needed citation, and further reading on the subject. These sites I linked to provide the book for free (in full!).

1325:

I have some questions regarding the refinance article that I just finished editting, and had all the changes reverted on. I understand your position in regards to spam links. I have fully familiarized myself with the spam policy, and I am fully confident that the changes I made, which you reverted,

2927:

Others also allow users to create their own music tones, either with a "melody composer" or a sample/loop arranger (such as the MusicDJ in many Sony Ericsson phones). However, these use native formats only available to one particular phone model or brand. Although other formats, such as MIDI or MP3,

1948:

I am fairly confident Luther himself would be ashamed of you. BTW, you are of course familiar with his comments on your Church building, which he made in his Ephiphany Sermon of 1527 I believe it's somewhere around page 161 in "What Luther says", Concordia Press. You should read your founders words

1934:

I noticed the Jehovah Witnesses have to cower their links behind plain numbers to keep you and/or others from deleting them. There are 6 million people who would like to see those links and this is an open public access encyclopedia. I am not JW, but I appreciate both truth and freedom of speech and

1884:

ministry has been hijacked by the user Seventhcroak -- whose questionable link you have removed before. The article, edited with that user name and anonymously as 68.154.25.139, has become a repository for the material that is on the external website in question. The content is (a) inflamatory and

1773:

Thanks. However, some of these books don't have ISBN's yet (I'm digitizing them and trying to get them all on googlebooks, but the process is slow). May I link to the books that do not have ISBN's? Also, wikipedia's ISBN search won't help your readers find the book: because I've only purchased 10

1590:

guidelines. I have thoroughly reviewed the guidelines and cannot see how it does not meet them. The site is in fact "directly and symmetrically related to the articles subject" as much of the article talks about the exact programs listed on the site and even the maker of those programs - it is the

1524:

Sorry, I should've clarified. I posted the original comment (I forgot to sign in) which asked for people's opinions on the site. I don't see how that has anything to do with people signing up or making comments. Also, the link may be to a website that sells calculator programs, but they also give

1337:

I appreciate that you have to remain vigilant on spam matters, as I can only imagine the quantity of spam you receive, but I am at a loss here. In obeying the specific requests of one moderator, I have apparently run afoul of another, and even my removal of spam links has been reverted. Every link

1333:

I forgot to sign in when I made these changes today, but I am the person who originally re-wrote the entire article about a month ago. At that time, I added reference links to the pages I had used as reference when re-writing it. Another moderator, whose name I have since forgotten (but who should

962:

Ah yes, I guess I misread the block page. Looks like 1-3 months is the going rate. Although, I guess I don't understand why an permanent anon-ban would be bad. It's unlikely this vandalism will stop but productive users could easily create an account and then edit (assuming anon-only still allows

548:

We had a disagreement a few days ago about a few external links. Yet, I looked today in the "Cover Letter" section and there are two external links that are irrelevant, especially one with Adsense. This simply doesn't make sense in terms of what links are allowed and what links are disallowed. At

525:

I agree that the "Ron Burgundy" vandalism is annoying and somewhat persistent, but I don't think it's quite hit the level of persistence requiring protection. I escalate warnings to the Burgundy vandals quickly (I start with a "blatant" warning and go straight to a test 4 if they persist), or block

148:

Entirely confused about the deletion. Unearth Travel is a creative commons travel wiki in a very similar vein to Wikitravel and World66, which as it happens has more free information than the named sites for some areas of the world. Surely if they are deemed appropriate entries then Unearth Travel

2256:

Hey man, listen I know 6 people who have been blocked indefinitly by YOU for minor vandalism without warning. Its become out of hand and thats why this matter is being investigated. Either you shape up, or this could get serious. And thats not a threat. I don't mean to sound hostile about this, but

1469:

Why are you so against highersat.com? I am not pushing the link, I simply posted a message in the discussion area as you suggested because I think the link is relevant to the article (I mean the article is about the programs on the site yet you won't allow any mention of the programs or site), and

1189:

from another article myself because it appears to have no encyclopaedic content at all (and it was recently added to a series of articles in a questionable manner). The site itself contains no sources or refs, it is a "free" website that anyone can create, and it seems to be an opinion/essay. Since

647:

Unfortunately, it's impossible to make a clear-cut, black-and-white policy regarding links. In many cases, an editor will propose the addition of a link on the article's talk page; a consensus will determine whether or not the link is included. In most cases, we err on the side of excluding links

3017:

First of all, I didn't remove your friend's obit, and I didn't add Jennifer Strange's obit. I warned you for vandalizing another page. Jennifer Strange is notable because of the national and international media coverage surrounding her death. On the other hadn, a mention in a local newspaper does

2460:

Ok... so no Google ads. Did you look at the other websites under this category? It's very confusing because they are running google ads, requiring logins and asking for money. How am I different? The fact that I make $ 50 a month from Google ads doesn't come close to paying for the time I put into

1871:

Hey, I don't know if I'm writing in the correct place about this or not, but I just wanted to apologize for the vandalism that originated on my computer, and I wanted to let you know that it was not the owner's (my) fault, but rather one of his (my) stupid jerk friends who edited the page. I'm not

1585:

My main point was not how the site was brought to your attention; that was an aside in case that was affecting your judgment as I believe it may be doing just that. I saw that the person who was adding 7 links to SAT OS and removing the link to highersat.com was writing to you that I was spamming

1123:

It would benefit Christians. Many Christians want to know if the movie is suitable for a Christian audience or if it's something they want to take their children to see. Many of the writers at Grace-Centered write for newspapers, have books that are best sellers and have Ph.Ds. Many Christians and

514:

reference several times a week. I applied for semi-protection a few weeks ago (see the talk page of the article) but it was taken down a week later, and this continues to be an ongoing problem. Can full protection or a longer semi-protection be reinstated that will last for a longer time period? I

1921:

Ah, but it's OK to call everyone else that disagrees with you a "Grinch"? And expect it not to be considered "inflammatory"? I think it is a perspective readers should have to opportunity decide for themselves. It does represent the history and speak to the perspectives of 172 Million Americans.

1837:

I recall that at the time of it first few speedy deletions and subsequent protection that none of the versions created had any claims of notability. I'd noticed recently that there were numerous posts on the talk page asking why it was deleted; I did some research and found several media mentions

1503:

talk page. The most recent one was by a new user, who apparently registered an account for the sole purpose of suggesting the link. Regardless of how long the link was there before and how many new people register just to suggest it, it's a commercial link for a test prep country, and as such is

399:

Hi Jamie.You removed my external link on Panic Attacks. My site is not for any profit but has a talk community of over 250 people and we focus solely on panic attacks. There is a constant stream of information occurring there. Spam is FOR profit or FOR an agenda. This site is free information and

31:

I apologize in advance, if this is not the correct method of contacting you, but I simply do not know how to communicate to you. A few months ago I corrected a misspelling on an article about Boutique Hotels, and added a link to a magazine, Deluxe Traveller, which I am the publisher of. I was not

2308:

Listen asshole, you blocked my previous account for absolutely no reason. I stand with Albott on this. You have been completely misusing you adminship. Don't think the rules dont apply to you because youre some bigshot administrator who must prove himself better than someone else. I also find it

1329:

If you'll check the article now, there are two reference links to a site called "thetruthaboutmortgage.com" Go to that site. It is not an informational ressource about refinance, and the references aren't even properly formatted according to Knowledge (XXG) standards. In my changes, I removed

1341:

I respectfully request that you reconsider your decision on this matter. Please follow the links you deleted, and the ones you reverted the page to, and tell me where you find the spam. Don't simply delete changes because you see an external link has appeared, especially if the changes are to

798:

I understand your position and I agree with your personal choice. I haven't been able to locate any established guidelines for external links on geography project pages, so perhaps the best way to approach the tourism spam problem is simply to raise the issue, including on the Caribbean project

125:

If the links were added on an individual basis by the artist or fans, they probably would've been left. When one individual adds multiple links to the same site, it sets of the spam alarms. I looked at the page for Mew; it didn't seem to have anything that Mewsite and their MySpace page didn't

754:

Hi there Jamie, I have admired your work from the silent sections of the peanut gallery for awhile now ;), including your anti-spam efforts---which is why I'm here. I thought I'd ask for your input before I try one of the spam discussion pages: I'm troubled by the external link category called

773:

Personally, I wouldn't think that a separate subsection for Tourism links would be appropriate, for the reasons you enumerate. I usually delete any commercial tourism links unless they are city/state-sponsored (or otherwise official)or links to the Wikitravel site. I'm not sure if there is an

1701:

I don't have the medical expertise to say 100% either way, but I've been under the impression that most of his opponents are peddlers of snake oil and dubious treatments/therapies with no reputable research backing them. I don't think there's one single medical opinion that will be accepted

1930:

Dear Pastor Dave, I noticed in your Bio you are Lutheran. You claim the site's content is inflammatory and biased against Catholicism. Your founder was biased against catholicism and your very existence is considered "inflammatory". You are quite hypocritical in your censorship behaviors.

172:

Unlike your site, Wikitravel is non-commercial (does not have ads, etc.) I haven't seen any link-campaigns related to World-66, but I would've deleted those as well. As mentioned in the spam warning, you are encouraged to add content to Knowledge (XXG) articles, not links. Thanks,

1998:

It's not vandalism to remove unnecessary citations. I've added a few in the talk page if someone absolutely insists, but the ongoing efforts by a user or two to pretend that bongs are used primarily for tobacco is vandalism, and I've started blocking users who continue to do it.

1190:

you have more experience with these things, I naturally wonder if I'm missing something. If you review the site, do you think it actually merits inclusion in our articles? Since I have taken a lot of guidance from you in the past, I'd very much like to know your opinion.

360:

few parents who don't do the Santa thing for at least a little while) I have no idea how widespread it is in the rest of the world, or in real numbers in the US for that matter. I think a cite tag is appropriate, given that it's a shaky blanket/global statement to make.

77:

We would greatly appreciate you reconsidering your policy of cancelling links to Haystack.com. The Haystack.com pages for artists are managed and controlled by the artist and label, making them more akin to the artist's homepage than links to Myspace, Purevolume, etc.

190:

The ads have been taken off, I am proposing to add links where appropriate (as in there is more useful information for the user than Knowledge (XXG) currently has). We cannot transfer the information to the site as the licences are not the same. What do you think?

1842:, so I restored it. The deletion policy states, "If it is believed that a significantly better researched article would be verifiable and otherwise meet Knowledge (XXG) article criteria, then recreation for good cause and in good faith may well be reasonable." 1534:

I feel that you are simply in the mindset that this is linkspam because another user reported me as link spamming, while they were simply removing the link that was there and adding 7 links to SAT OS. Doesn't removing the link that was there and adding

1037:

Are you his brother? Why do you feel qualified to delete everything negative about him even though it is footnoted, sourced, and newsworthy? (multiple news stories at the time). You don't even give reasons for your maneuvers. You need to cease now.

423:

Hi Jeff. I took a closer look at your site. It seems to be non-profit. I reverted the links because it appeared that you immediately added the links to more than numerous articles (which made it appear to be a spamming campaign). If you re-add them to

1885:(b) biased against catholicism. That is less important in WP ... it is unreferenced, unverifiable, and represents POV. The article has been tagged twice, with the tags summarily removed. Please check it out when you have a moment. Thanks. 1774:

ISBN's, I can't be listed with any major booksellers or libraries (I'm working on that, too). May I link to the googlebooks (a 3rd party) and, when that is impossible, to the website where they are posted for free download in MS WORD format?

1119:

In removing some external links to GraceCentered.com pages reviewing movies you said, "Batman Begins, Shrek, The Incredibles, Friday Night Lights, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow don't seem to benefit from having a Christian review."

1019:, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on 96:

The artists and labels that have created these pages have asked us to help drive interest in their new releases, and Knowledge (XXG) is an important destination where the artists can reach the fanbases that are asking to hear their music.

1345:

I'm sorry this is so long, but I've put a lot of time and work into this article (you should have seen how it was before I showed up), and to have these changes revoked in favor of a spam site is disheartening to say the least.

93:. In a culture where piracy is so difficult to directly combat, we hope that the revenue generated from these pages can help support record sales, not supplant it. Haystack is not seeking to profit off artist's content. 2604:

What is so annoying is that there is a list of agencies there that is considered the most reputable in the industry and the spammer keeps on adding two scrupulous ones, with no identity or even a reputation to speak of.

2226:

The only time I indef block without warning is when it's obvious that (1) the account is vandalism-only or spam-only or (2) the account was created to avoid other blocks on other accounts. Example; this user was using a

1913: 939:

I don't know that there's much precedence for perma-blocking IP addresses, especially one that serves multiple schools. On the other hand, I'm not averse to blocking school IPs for progressively longer intervals.

2133:

generic, inclusive international term cannabis, or whenever referring to grass, herbal cannabis. Please keep in mind that this is an international and not a US or North American encyclopedia when editing. Thanks,

3322:

violation. I was looking at other "notable alumni" articles for a sanity check, and I noticed that the University of Pittsburgh one had very few citations. Shouldn't that article meet the same level of rigor?

2016:

It is vandalism to remove cites. Just give references, dont remove the cites as I assume it means you cant source and therefore if you remove them again I will follow policy and remove the unsourced material,

1473:

Also, for the record a link to the site had been on that wiki for a few months without any complaints until the SAT OS person started repeatedly messing with it and replacing it with a link to his site.

377:

Thanks for clarifying. I don't want to harass the poor newbie too much, so I'll let things slide for awhile. I really do appreciate you taking the time to review such a minor detail. Happy editing : )

100:

While we understand the culture of Knowledge (XXG) is to be diligent on links that are deemed commercial spam and appreciate the importance of your role, we hope you can reconsider upon reflection.

493:

Hi there, I'm not sure where to edit the bottom of your page, so I'll try here. I see that you have banned 64.53.4.254 in the past. Just a heads up that I removed some more vandalism by them.

2876:

Please stop moving information relevent to the Post-presidency section. I do not have time to clean it up, but request that someone else does-- I simply pointed them in the correct direction

3221:

Hi Jamie We were just giving people the opportunity to be able to train in Beauty/A&P/Nails etc to introduce them to the beauty Industry. We didnt consider it to be spam christina

2104:

You accused me of vadalism, and rightfully so. I thought that I was hot stuff, and I thank you for putting me in my place. I'm a new man. Happy wikiing :) Please write back, friend. --

1914:

http://www.historytoday.com/dt_main_allatonce.asp?gid=12890&aid=&tgid=&amid=12890&g12890=x&g9130=x&g30026=x&g20991=x&g21010=x&g19965=x&g19963=x

1205:

That was a mistake (I thought my revert would "remove" the link rather than restore it). I agree that it's not appropriate, and I've reverted my reversion. Thanks for catching that!

916:, allowing logged-in edits only. I'm a former student of this school district - This IP address is a NAT router that serves every Ladue school (high school, middle, elementary). 65:

Why was my link change refused? All I did was download the inferior wav file, convert it to MP3, upload it and then change th wiki link to a direct download of the MP3 file.

1752:

Between your username and links, it appeared that your contributions were primarily intended as a vehicle to promote your site. If you'd like to use a book as a source, see

2093:

You recently accused me of vandalism. It turns out my friend was having fun on my computer when I wasn't looking and vandalized the Geek article. My sincerest apologies,

3414:? The article is claiming something major about the school's notability, and so it should be moved up. Also, trivia sections are weak. I don't see your point on this. -- 622:

I look forward to your feedback. Again, let me be clear that I appreciate your commitment to Knowledge (XXG), but we have different views about what's relevant or not.

1569:

guidelines. Regarding my mindset, anyone can see in my edit history that I've deleted many, many spam links. This isn't about me "having something against" your site.

2710: 2690: 2669: 2321: 2286: 2207: 3306: 2597:

I'm new here at wiki, and I'm trying to build up some pages and do some edits. However, there is one topic with a spammer who keeps on revising the changes I made.

1085:

Not trying to Spam, rather list some very important external links to what is now a significant aspect of the Knights Ferry experience...rafting and camping.

774:

official policy on having a separate section for Tourism, but I think it would be safe to say that most of (if not all) of links like that would run afoul of

2995:

Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to honor departed friends and relatives. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must be notable besides being fondly remembered.

2214:

Hello, I would like to know how to report an administrator for abuse. Is there a page I can visit or an admin i could speak with about this issue? Thanks

515:

believe you know the standards for protection more then I do since you're an administrator, so you can make a wiser decision. Let me know what you do. --

3224: 3106: 2969: 2047: 1961: 1732: 1628: 1594: 1542: 1261: 1127: 1088: 403: 236: 152: 41: 1945:

Your censorship crusades are inflammatory and biased. You spend your time evidently deleting every opinion but your own or those of "kindred spirit".

233:

Should I then pose the question on the talk pages about the existence of Wikitravel links versus Unearth Travel links (in line with the WP:EL section?

2479:

So, is she allowed to use her own talk page to post these rants? I thought that even user talk pages were for Knowledge (XXG) discussions. Blech.

2700:. For an outcome to be achieved, we require you list the code letter which matches with the violations of policy, which is listed at the top of the 2856:

Hi, just wondering, how do you alter the way your username looks in your signature that way some users do? Do you have to be an admin to do this? (

1586:

which I why I brought that up - that person is clearly the link spammer and trying to soil my name. But I digress, the website does in fact meet

1416: 3095:

as for the laptop "incident" we were play a game to see if the other could find the mistake. plus we were going to put everything back. - Rpm826

651:

In your particular case, your username makes it obvious that you are some sort of representative from the site whose links you are trying to ad.

619:

NOTE: Nowhere on the Web will you see so many resume and cover letter samples from professional writers. Yes, these are good samples, not spam.

1823:

This guy has been deleted and protected because of repeated lack of notability, it's not a good idea to recreate it without going through DRV.

1441:

I saw that you warned this user for spamming. However I had already blocked him coz it really looked like a spambot. Hope you don't mind. :-/ --

3492:

The link in question has little content; it mostly points to other advertisement-oriented sites. I see no evidence that it's "fairly popular."

2143:

You don't need to tell me that this is an international encyclopedia. Marijuana is not strictly a North American term; Britannica mentions it

1678:

I wouldn't say that Quackwatch is a reputable source, as Stephen Barrett is well known for SLAPP and libel suits against perceived opponents.

1250:

I will not repost the link, however, your objection to this link is hypocritical. It is certianly more more factually oriented than this one:

216:, specifically in that it is intended to promote a commercial website. Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to drive traffic to your web venture. 3118: 1392: 1380: 1598: 583:

How are the two first links more relevant than the last one, which gives access to over 25 cover letter samples from professional writers?

458:; you gave this user a final warning on 1 December so I wanted to let you know about this rather than {test4} again. Vandalism evidence: 400:

aims to helps people suffering from panic attacks and give them detailed explanations from those that have had panic attacks. Thanks, Jeff

116: 2940:

I don't think it would be appropriate to add info about Phone Sherpa unless Phone Sherpa is notable enough to merit it's own article; see

2554:

Can you explain to me why elearners.com is an acceptable external link on the online degrees page, but worldwidelearn.com is not? Thanks

3425: 3354: 1744: 1554: 1490: 1362: 45: 3274:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 3013:

Yes, but you put jennifer strange's obiturary in. she was in the news, but so was my friend. even if its just the local news. - Rpm826

2822: 3394:

violation? I won't re-add the cite-needed tag to the Pitt alumni article, but the fact remains that the majority of it is not cited.

3236: 3135:

This is Srihari Raju. I have post Republic Day India eGreeting on Republic Day Parade article. Please check external link is this OK.

2892: 1973: 1273: 2966:

I have a question. why did you delete my friends obituary? i did everything in order and it wasn't a prank. answer me back please. -

728:

I escalated the warning to spam4 (since it's obviously a sockpuppet spammer). Oh, and some friendly advice; as tempting as it is to

257: 2177:

I had a recent page entry titled The Game, and it was deleted, could I please know the reason? heydabop 04:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

1896: 81:

In addition, revenue from those pages goes to the artists themselves, unlike most other social network destinations on the web. See

3195:, for one thing. Someone has created a page for it in the Knowledge (XXG) namespace (as opposed to the main article namespace) at 1100: 415: 149:

should be? If the problem is that there is not enough information on the page, that can be recitified. Thank you for your time

638: 248: 205: 164: 1729:

Would you like me to redo the links directly to google books? Is there another way to cite these books? Please let me know!

2708:, and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is 2059: 1625:

What are the requirements for putting people on City pages? Like What makes them eligible to be listed from a certain City?

890:

I blocked a few. They're all from the same range, so I'll consider a range block if it continues (or maybe semi-protection).

1935:

feel it is important to respect the right of the public to read what people like you spend all their time trying to censor.

1880:

As you are an admin who has dealt with this editor before, I thought I should bring this to your attention. The article

1057: 555:

guidelines as to what external links are allowed? (I am aware of the current guidelines, but they are not that upfront.)

2981: 1640: 526:

vandalism only accounts. If the frequency of attemts increases, I'd be amenable to going with semi-protection. Cheers,

3267: 2818: 2765:, Knowledge (XXG) has around 1,500,000 articles and Wikipedians have made 104,000,000 edits. The millionth article was 3244:

If you read the links in the warnings you've been given, you'll see that Knowledge (XXG) does consider it to be spam.

2829: 2790: 1410: 1139: 2781: 1258:

PS. I think you have done the reading public a great disservice. I will leave it to you to reconsider your decision.

213: 1958:

You will not stop this message from being heard. And the more you fight it, the worse you are going to look for it.

1783: 1383:

for Knowledge (XXG) use logo variations created by members of the wiki community to mark national and international

90: 2766: 455: 301: 2380: 2342: 3114: 1988:

Dont remove cites, give a reference for them but dont remove them as such an action may be considered vandalism,

1004:

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Knowledge (XXG)'s

840:

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Knowledge (XXG)'s

3129:

About the warning you gave me. No, you didn't explain the rule to me. I am still waitingo n that one Mr. Jamie.

1238:

RESPONSE TO DISCUSSION ========================================================================================

112: 2623:

After their last warning they just replaced the catholic page with a load of abuse. Block on sight.--Rasillon

1602: 2512:

All of what she posts is taken from her personal blog, she already has a location where she can post this.

1795: 1706:

as sources, even though I doubt there's much they agree on. Both have reasonably large bodies of supporters.

718:

article again with the same site. Would it be possible to block the HigherSAT.com URL from Knowledge (XXG)?

49: 3461:

I've looked at some of Knowledge (XXG)'s spam policiies & I believe it should be added to that article:

3420: 3349: 2888: 2231:

in an obvious case of sockpuppetry in a case where many warnings (and blocks) had already been issued. See

2031:

Happy New Year Ohnoitsjamie! I havnt talked to you in forever! Anyway, Merry Chirstmas, heres your present:

1740: 1684: 1550: 1486: 1358: 715: 697: 3192: 2880: 1478: 1350: 626: 104: 3500: 3402: 3378: 3331: 3292: 3252: 3232: 3207: 3182: 3178: 3169: 3165: 3154: 3110: 3083: 3054: 3026: 3004: 2952: 2909: 2780:

Knowledge (XXG) has moved from an Alexa rank of 20 to a rank of 12 having already briefly visited rank 8 (

2680: 2580: 2451: 2426: 2332: 2297: 2277: 2247: 2193: 2160: 2079: 2007: 1969: 1854: 1809: 1764: 1714: 1664: 1577: 1512: 1427: 1406: 1289: 1269: 1213: 1167: 1068: 948: 898: 790: 740: 674: 534: 479: 440: 369: 317: 276: 224: 181: 134: 17: 3196: 913: 634: 108: 3164:

Hey James, Why did you delete my WikiGAme page? You didn't explain anyting to me. You just deleted it.--

2857: 2620: 2105: 2096: 1890: 1881: 1736: 1546: 1482: 1448: 1354: 1225: 1194: 1020: 1009: 993: 711: 693: 689: 381: 341: 294: 3228: 3092:

That is a dumb rule....:p. Seriously let him keep it up. It isn't bothering anyone....-OnionRingMaster

2884: 2555: 2406: 2368: 1965: 1265: 1151:

I never said anything about Batman or Shrek. You are mistaking me with another editor. Regardless, see

2901:

Please don't add material requiring cleanup to the main article page; take it to the talk page first.

1791: 1396: 1106: 1096: 1092: 411: 407: 630: 356:; that's a tough one. I think the statement mostly holds true in the United States (though I've met 86: 873: 596:

There seems to be no clearly defined criteria... But in terms of usefulness, it is arguable that:

244: 199: 160: 2729: 2034: 1053: 851:

If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the

293:

Thank you for reverting the personal attack on my talk page Ohnoitsjame. I appreciate it, thanks.

3415: 3344: 3275: 2973: 2762: 2055: 1689: 1632: 760: 732:, it's always best to remain civil in such matters. Keep up the good spam fighting work! Thanks, 3411: 3391: 3367: 3340: 3319: 3302: 2236: 1131: 1005: 841: 3510: 3063:

Of course it counts, We knew her. And it wasn't just a mention in the news....-OnionRingMaster

3494: 3396: 3372: 3325: 3286: 3246: 3201: 3148: 3077: 3048: 3020: 2998: 2946: 2903: 2839: 2800: 2722: 2674: 2606: 2574: 2445: 2420: 2326: 2312: 2291: 2271: 2241: 2187: 2154: 2119: 2073: 2001: 1848: 1803: 1758: 1708: 1658: 1571: 1506: 1421: 1283: 1241:

I posted 2 links to this site. One of which I removed myself. The second was removed by you.

1207: 1161: 1062: 942: 920: 892: 784: 734: 668: 600: 577: 528: 473: 434: 363: 311: 270: 218: 175: 128: 3143: 2941: 2701: 2697: 2565: 2440: 2232: 1753: 1253: 1156: 779: 663: 265: 2977: 2650: 2411: 2391: 2373: 2353: 1886: 1636: 1453: 1388: 1376: 1306: 1222: 1191: 1016: 881: 782:. I'll see if I can find any "official" guidelines on destination articles regarding that. 516: 378: 338: 3072: 3068: 2990: 2665: 2182: 2150: 1839: 1653: 194:

I have not had any reply from you but am still interested in your opinion, please advise.

3271: 2705: 2598: 2401:

Would you care to either remove the wikibreak code, or delete the entire page altogether.

2363:

Would you care to either remove the wikibreak code, or delete the entire page altogether.

1787: 1135: 852: 3177:

Still waiting on an answer....You didn't explain anything to me. Just deleted it. Why? --

2569: 2144: 1587: 1566: 1152: 997: 833: 775: 659: 652: 261: 1052:

The issue has been discussed on the talk page; as mentioned there, the content violates

3503: 3432: 3405: 3381: 3361: 3334: 3295: 3278: 3255: 3210: 3185: 3172: 3157: 3122: 3086: 3057: 3029: 3007: 2955: 2912: 2860: 2846: 2807: 2724: 2683: 2659: 2624: 2609: 2583: 2558: 2537: 2534: 2516: 2513: 2496: 2493: 2483: 2480: 2473: 2470: 2454: 2429: 2335: 2315: 2300: 2280: 2263: 2250: 2220: 2196: 2163: 2137: 2134: 2122: 2108: 2099: 2082: 2063: 2021: 2018: 2010: 1992: 1989: 1900: 1857: 1831: 1812: 1767: 1717: 1695: 1667: 1644: 1606: 1580: 1558: 1515: 1459: 1430: 1399: 1384: 1309: 1292: 1230: 1216: 1199: 1170: 1143: 1109: 1071: 1046: 967: 951: 931: 901: 884: 803: 793: 767: 743: 722: 704: 677: 562: 537: 519: 497: 482: 465: 443: 425: 386: 372: 346: 320: 303: 279: 240: 227: 195: 184: 156: 137: 53: 3103:

Why did you delete my article. There was nothing wrong with it. You are on a roll....

2269:

You're not going to get very far in your "investigation" without providing specifics.

1940: 2051: 1953: 1828: 1679: 1043: 1039: 845: 829: 2649:

are the only accounts I have ever used or created. Please reply back on my talk page

2834: 2795: 2715: 2656: 2646: 2147: 1565:

Regardless of how the page came to my intention, the higher sat site does not meet

549:

this point, it seems that it is a subjective call. Do you know when there will be

429: 2653:. I have posted an unblock request already and it seams to be ignored. Thank you. 2629:

Its okay, Martinp23 has took care of it :)--Rasillon 19:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

2395: 2357: 1844:

If it had been deleted and protect via AFD, I would've sent it to Deletion review.

1008:. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the 844:. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the 610: 590: 2821:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

3516:

Thank you for your time, and I'm sorry we couldn't come to an agreement. --Mjas

3370:

aspect further, but you have yet to address the lack of citations on that page.

2642: 2638: 2260: 2217: 1703: 1443: 964: 928: 719: 701: 494: 462: 985: 821: 692:, who tended to employ misleading edit summaries. He's posting under the name 567: 2118:

Thanks for cleaning up that vandalism on my user page. Very much appreciated.

1910:

Evidently you don't seem to mind the "Inflammatory remarks" against Puritans.

800: 764: 3284:

I suggest reading the previous AFDs before nominating this for review again.

3455: 1952:

You are fighting on the wrong side of this historical fence my dear Pastor.

327: 2749: 2033: 2742: 1756:

for instructions on how to make ISBN links (they're pretty easy). Thanks,

1221:

Thanks for the clarification Jamie, I thought I needed a sanity-check : )

586:

And how about this link which gives access to close to 80 resume samples:

471:

Thanks for the heads-up. IP is blocked 48 hours (second vandalism block).

2461:

programming, research and website maintenance fees. Thanks again, Tosoft

1824: 82: 27:

Comment regarding previous removal of an external link to Boutique Hotels

2761:

On January 15, 2007, Knowledge (XXG) turned six-years-old. According to

1925: 1186: 616:

provide useful examples of what otherwise would be abstract concepts.

2770: 2933: 1786:

had survived prod back in October, I've moved the discussion to AfD.

1185:

which had been removed by another editor. I had actually just removed

3509:

Thank you for your reply. Some evidence to show it has popularity is

3043: 2641:

was blocked for being a sockpuppet of an account Ive never heard of.

996:, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring 832:, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring 2418:

I changed the date to the 7th...let me know if that doesn't fix it.

1326:

not only were not spam, but actually REMOVED spam from the article.

655:

makes it clear that editors should not add links to their own sites.

2398:

pending my wikibreak; however, I have set it to one too many days.

2360:

pending my wikibreak; however, I have set it to one too many days.

1060:

standards. If you continue to add the content, you may be blocked.

3035:

Who is it bothering? You should have kept it up. -OnionRingMaster

2394:. I have entered a script into my monobook.js barring me entry to 2356:. I have entered a script into my monobook.js barring me entry to 756: 551: 309:

No problem; I threw in an indefinite block for good measure. ;)

2774: 2390:

time); I am editing under an IP address, but I normally pass as

2352:

time); I am editing under an IP address, but I normally pass as

1391:, notable anniversaries, and observance days. Please comment on 3142:

No, as mentioned before, adding such links is considered to be

2439:

It's your website and it has Google ads. That's a violation of

1124:

non Christians value their viewpoints. Please respond. Thanks.

2387: 2349: 3511:

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?url=http://multiz.com

2748: 2741: 1342:

delete spam links and replace them with informational ones.

921:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/204.184.18.230

3046:

at the same time, I'd say that doesn't count for too much.

2704:

page. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for

2601:

and I hope something can be done to remedy the situation.

2322:

Check user confirms that you are a serial sockpuppet vandal

2287:

Check user confirms that you are a serial sockpuppet vandal

1846:

Whoops, my mistake; I see that it did go through an AFD.

1254:

http://www.citybeat.com/archives/1996/issue304/cover1.html

750:

About single-use accounts, external link sections and spam

334: 1939:

Protestant. In fact, the combined MAJORITY of Americans.

658:

Keep in mind that if you see links that you feel violate

454:

There was a recent vandalism by anon ip 68.114.63.121 to

1393:

Knowledge (XXG):Village_pump_(proposals)#Logo Variations

3387: 2823:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

2510: 2228: 1500: 1302: 1182: 729: 459: 353: 1181:

Hi Jamie, I noticed that you recently restored a link

878:

With that kind of diligence, maybe they are a top ISP.

1702:

universally. Personally, I'd be fine with Barrett or

976:

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

812:

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

563:

http://www.writinghelp-central.com/cover-letter.html

260:; that's a very active discussion area for debating 2814:

TfD nomination of Template:Segway Geeks Recruitment

2691:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for checkuser/Case/Tooj117

2670:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Tooj117

2668:confirmed that account as a vandal sockpuupet; see 2208:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Tooj117

1941:

http://www.freewebs.com/christmaslie/thescrooge.htm

573:I compare these links with this one for instance: 1954:http://www.freewebs.com/christmaslie/thespirit.htm 1539:all to the same thing sound a little suspicious? 1115:Please reconsider review from different viewpoint 3485:Any reasons why would be very much appreciated. 3479: 2637:Hello, I'm curious as to why my primary account 333:Hi J, thanks for yanking the excess "fact" tags 3307:List of notable University of Pittsburgh people 3312:Please do not edit Knowledge (XXG) to prove a 3042:Given the fact that you were both vandalizing 2229:deceptive edit summary to try to sneak in spam 1301:The link is being reposted on ather articles. 3181:23:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)OnionRingMaster-- 3168:23:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)OnionRingMaster-- 2944:for guidelines regarding company notability. 1281:Thanks for agreeing not to repost the links. 8: 880::) I'm reverting. Can you block a few? -- 568:http://www.csuchico.edu/plc/coverltr-ex.html 510:San Diego continues to be vandalized by the 3075:for policies and guidelines on notability. 3038:at least someone ogrees with me. - Rpm826 2696:You recently compiled and listed a case at 2564:Feel free to remove any links that violate 2934:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Tradcast 1918:This one is even a PAY SUBSCRIPTION SITE! 983: 819: 212:In my opinion, it's still in violation of 912:I'd like to suggest a permanent block of 256:I'd recommend posing the question at the 1159:for more info regarding external links. 688:Hi, I noticed you reverted some spam by 666:, you can delete them yourself. Cheers, 558:Also, these are the two external links: 3410:How does that have anything to do with 2181:There was a consensus to delete it via 876:is getting hit with more sockpuppets. 289:Thanks for Rving the Personal Attack... 1405:Actually, I'm not a graphic designer. 1926:http://www.freewebs.com/christmaslie/ 1499:I don't see any of your posts to the 1042:02:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)ColScott 700:. Could you do something about him? 7: 285:Thank you,will have a go. PSBennett 3018:not satisfy notability guidelines. 1777: 1015:You have been left this message by 2590:Dedicated spammer, need your help. 2443:in terms of conflict-of-interest. 919:Judging from the edit history at: 24: 3386:I suppose that you'll argue that 2819:Template:Segway Geeks Recruitment 1305:it is on the Christmas article. 2714:. Thanks for your co-operation. 1379:, you might be interested in my 1103:) 03:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC). 984: 820: 990: 826: 1: 2100:03:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC) 2083:05:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 2064:04:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC) 2022:19:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 2011:19:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 1993:19:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 1901:03:20, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 1858:02:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 1832:00:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC) 1813:20:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 1796:18:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 1768:17:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC) 1718:23:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 1696:22:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 1668:07:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 1645:02:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 1607:12:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 1581:07:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 1559:05:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC) 1516:22:47, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 1460:18:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 1431:17:52, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 1400:05:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC) 1395:and on my talk page. Thanks! 1310:03:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 1293:20:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 1231:23:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 1217:19:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 1200:19:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 1171:17:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 1144:16:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 1110:04:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 1072:02:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 1056:and none of the sources meet 1047:02:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC) 968:03:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 952:03:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 932:03:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 927:made a non-vandalizing edit. 902:00:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 885:00:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 710:The same person is now under 280:14:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 228:17:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC) 3504:05:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3458:, and the link was removed: 3433:22:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3406:00:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3382:00:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3362:00:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3335:00:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 3296:05:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 3279:03:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 3256:17:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 3211:00:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 3186:23:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 3173:23:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC) 3158:07:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 3123:01:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 3087:00:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 3067:Once again, please refer to 3058:00:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 3030:00:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 3008:00:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 2956:21:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 2913:04:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2861:20:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2847:01:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2808:23:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2725:23:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2684:20:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2660:19:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2625:18:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2619:You have the right to block 2610:05:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2538:01:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 2517:21:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 2497:03:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2484:16:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2336:21:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2301:21:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 1674:Barrett, Stephen/ Quackwatch 804:23:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 794:01:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 768:00:17, 9 December 2006 (UTC) 744:22:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 723:22:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC) 705:01:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 678:02:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 538:02:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC) 520:19:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 498:17:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC) 483:23:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 466:23:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 444:22:59, 3 December 2006 (UTC) 387:05:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC) 373:05:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC) 347:04:57, 3 December 2006 (UTC) 321:19:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 304:19:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 185:17:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 138:17:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC) 54:01:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 3474:And it's a helpful resource 2584:17:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 2559:17:09, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 2474:15:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 2455:15:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 2430:00:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 2316:23:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 2281:21:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 2264:20:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 2251:20:12, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 2221:06:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 2197:06:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 2164:04:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 2138:03:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 2123:00:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 2109:15:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 1244:As far as your discussion. 69:Update: Anybody out there? 3530: 3366:I'm won't argue about the 3266:An editor has asked for a 2767:Jordanhill railway station 2757:Happy Knowledge (XXG) Day! 2737:Happy Knowledge (XXG) Day! 2043: 923:- this IP has essentially 456:Russia-Ukraine gas dispute 258:Wikiproject Spam talk page 3197:Knowledge (XXG):Wiki_Game 2257:it has become a problem. 2036:File:Geek rubber duck.jpg 1784:Michael 'Warble" Finucane 1778:Michael 'Warble" Finucane 85:or articles published in 2867:Carter Nazi Allegations 1656:notability guidelines. 1375:I've noticed you are a 1021:PocKleanBot's talk page 908:Blocking 204.184.18.230 144:Unearth Travel deletion 83:RightsNow Media Royalty 3482:. com/ webmaster.php. 2753: 2746: 2492:Thanks for watching. 2040: 855:on your user talk page 716:SAT_calculator_program 698:SAT_calculator_program 18:User talk:Ohnoitsjamie 3465:It was not commercial 3339:You are describing a 3227:comment was added by 3109:comment was added by 2972:comment was added by 2752: 2745: 2702:request for checkuser 2698:request for checkuser 2621:User talk:64.8.190.50 2509:She's still doing it. 2183:articles for deletion 2050:comment was added by 2039: 1964:comment was added by 1735:comment was added by 1631:comment was added by 1597:comment was added by 1545:comment was added by 1264:comment was added by 1130:comment was added by 1091:comment was added by 994:Bella Vista, Arkansas 714:. He's spamming the 406:comment was added by 239:comment was added by 155:comment was added by 91:Digital Music Weblogs 44:comment was added by 3318:I don't see it as a 3138:Thanks Gsrihariraju 1187:the site in question 601:Cover Letter Samples 578:Cover Letter Samples 2071:Thanks, I love it! 2044:Sincerely, Tooj117 1801:Good call, thanks. 1058:WP:Reliable sources 914:User:204.184.18.230 874:Web hosting service 868:Web hosting service 3454:I added a link to 2784:). Happy editing! 2754: 2747: 2041: 1882:Five-fold ministry 1621:People from Cities 1458: 963:acct. creation). 684:Persistent spammer 544:Re: External Links 297:¤~Persian Poet Gal 73:Haystack.com links 3240: 3126: 2985: 2897: 2883:comment added by 2550:User:Liza Hausman 2067: 1977: 1748: 1648: 1610: 1562: 1495: 1481:comment added by 1442: 1407:Master_of_Puppets 1367: 1353:comment added by 1318:Refinance Article 1277: 1177:Questionable link 1147: 1104: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1006:quality standards 861: 860: 856: 842:quality standards 643: 629:comment added by 450:RE: 68.114.63.121 419: 252: 168: 121: 107:comment added by 57: 3521: 3498: 3428: 3423: 3400: 3376: 3357: 3352: 3329: 3314: 3313: 3290: 3250: 3222: 3205: 3152: 3104: 3081: 3052: 3024: 3002: 2967: 2950: 2932:Retrieved from " 2907: 2896: 2877: 2858:EnglishEfternamn 2842: 2837: 2832: 2803: 2798: 2793: 2720: 2678: 2651:user_talk:h4xx0r 2578: 2449: 2424: 2412:User:Anthony cfc 2392:User:Anthony cfc 2374:User:Anthony cfc 2354:User:Anthony cfc 2330: 2295: 2275: 2245: 2191: 2158: 2077: 2045: 2037: 2005: 1959: 1852: 1807: 1762: 1730: 1712: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1662: 1626: 1592: 1575: 1540: 1510: 1494: 1475: 1456: 1451: 1446: 1425: 1389:Remembrance Days 1377:graphic designer 1366: 1347: 1322:Good afternoon, 1287: 1259: 1228: 1211: 1197: 1165: 1125: 1086: 1066: 1014: 988: 981: 980: 946: 896: 850: 824: 817: 816: 788: 738: 672: 642: 623: 532: 489:Another offender 477: 438: 401: 384: 367: 344: 315: 274: 234: 222: 179: 150: 132: 120: 101: 39: 3529: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3496: 3449: 3430: 3426: 3421: 3398: 3374: 3359: 3355: 3350: 3327: 3310: 3288: 3272:The Game (game) 3268:deletion review 3264: 3262:The Game, Redux 3248: 3223:—The preceding 3219: 3203: 3183:Onionringmaster 3179:Onionringmaster 3170:Onionringmaster 3166:Onionringmaster 3150: 3111:Onionringmaster 3105:—The preceding 3101: 3079: 3050: 3022: 3000: 2968:—The preceding 2964: 2948: 2905: 2878: 2874: 2869: 2854: 2840: 2835: 2830: 2816: 2811: 2810: 2801: 2796: 2791: 2759: 2739: 2730:checkuser clerk 2716: 2694: 2676: 2635: 2617: 2599:Modeling agency 2592: 2576: 2552: 2467: 2465:User:Sundiiiaaa 2447: 2422: 2396:Knowledge (XXG) 2384: 2358:Knowledge (XXG) 2346: 2328: 2293: 2285:Furthermore, : 2273: 2243: 2239:for more info. 2212: 2189: 2175: 2156: 2130: 2116: 2091: 2075: 2046:—The preceding 2035: 2029: 2003: 1986: 1960:—The preceding 1908: 1878: 1869: 1850: 1821: 1805: 1780: 1760: 1731:—The preceding 1726: 1710: 1690: 1685: 1680: 1676: 1660: 1627:—The preceding 1623: 1593:—The preceding 1573: 1541:—The preceding 1508: 1476: 1467: 1454: 1449: 1444: 1439: 1423: 1419:) did my page. 1397:FrummerThanThou 1373: 1348: 1320: 1285: 1260:—The preceding 1226: 1209: 1195: 1179: 1163: 1126:—The preceding 1117: 1087:—The preceding 1083: 1064: 1035: 1030: 978: 944: 910: 894: 870: 862: 853:nobots template 814: 786: 752: 736: 686: 670: 624: 546: 530: 508: 491: 475: 452: 436: 402:—The preceding 397: 382: 365: 342: 335:in this section 331: 313: 291: 272: 235:—The preceding 220: 177: 151:—The preceding 146: 130: 109:71.247.233.148 102: 75: 63: 40:—The preceding 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3527: 3525: 3507: 3506: 3476: 3475: 3472: 3471:Fairly popular 3469: 3468:No advertising 3466: 3448: 3447:Webmaster Link 3445: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3419: 3416:Chris Griswold 3348: 3345:Chris Griswold 3309: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3263: 3260: 3259: 3258: 3218: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3163: 3161: 3160: 3100: 3097: 3090: 3089: 3061: 3060: 3033: 3032: 3011: 3010: 2963: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2931: 2926: 2918: 2916: 2915: 2873: 2870: 2868: 2865: 2853: 2850: 2815: 2812: 2786: 2755: 2740: 2738: 2735: 2693: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2634: 2631: 2616: 2613: 2591: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2551: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2487: 2486: 2466: 2463: 2458: 2457: 2433: 2432: 2409: 2405: 2386:Good evening ( 2383: 2381:My monobook.js 2378: 2371: 2367: 2348:Good evening ( 2345: 2343:My monobook.js 2340: 2339: 2338: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2254: 2253: 2211: 2204: 2202: 2200: 2199: 2174: 2171: 2169: 2167: 2166: 2129: 2126: 2115: 2112: 2090: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2028: 2027:Happy New Year 2025: 2014: 2013: 1985: 1982: 1980: 1949:occasionally. 1907: 1904: 1877: 1874: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1861: 1860: 1820: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1779: 1776: 1771: 1770: 1725: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1675: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1622: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1599:67.186.153.190 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1519: 1518: 1466: 1463: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1385:awareness days 1372: 1369: 1319: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1296: 1295: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1116: 1113: 1082: 1079: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1034: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1013: 1002: 989: 979: 977: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 957: 956: 955: 954: 909: 906: 905: 904: 869: 866: 864: 859: 858: 849: 838: 825: 815: 813: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 751: 748: 747: 746: 712:71.165.157.97 709: 685: 682: 681: 680: 656: 649: 614: 613: 611:Resume Samples 604: 603: 594: 593: 591:Resume Samples 581: 580: 571: 570: 565: 545: 542: 541: 540: 507: 504: 502: 490: 487: 486: 485: 461:. Regards, -- 451: 448: 447: 446: 426:Panic disorder 396: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 330: 325: 324: 323: 290: 287: 283: 282: 231: 230: 188: 187: 145: 142: 141: 140: 126:already have. 74: 71: 68: 62: 59: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3526: 3517: 3514: 3512: 3505: 3502: 3501: 3499: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3486: 3483: 3481: 3480:http://multiz 3473: 3470: 3467: 3464: 3463: 3462: 3459: 3457: 3452: 3446: 3434: 3429: 3424: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3408: 3407: 3404: 3403: 3401: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3380: 3379: 3377: 3369: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3358: 3353: 3346: 3343:violation. -- 3342: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3333: 3332: 3330: 3321: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3308: 3304: 3301: 3297: 3294: 3293: 3291: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3261: 3257: 3254: 3253: 3251: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3216: 3212: 3209: 3208: 3206: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3184: 3180: 3175: 3174: 3171: 3167: 3159: 3156: 3155: 3153: 3145: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3136: 3133: 3130: 3127: 3124: 3120: 3116: 3112: 3108: 3098: 3096: 3093: 3088: 3085: 3084: 3082: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3059: 3056: 3055: 3053: 3045: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3036: 3031: 3028: 3027: 3025: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3009: 3006: 3005: 3003: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2961: 2957: 2954: 2953: 2951: 2943: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2935: 2929: 2924: 2920: 2914: 2911: 2910: 2908: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2871: 2866: 2864: 2862: 2859: 2851: 2849: 2848: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2838: 2833: 2825:. Thank you. 2824: 2820: 2813: 2809: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2799: 2794: 2785: 2783: 2778: 2776: 2772: 2769:, created on 2768: 2764: 2758: 2751: 2744: 2736: 2734: 2732: 2731: 2726: 2723: 2721: 2719: 2713: 2712: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2692: 2689: 2685: 2682: 2681: 2679: 2671: 2667: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2658: 2654: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2632: 2630: 2627: 2626: 2622: 2614: 2612: 2611: 2608: 2602: 2600: 2595: 2589: 2585: 2582: 2581: 2579: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2557: 2549: 2539: 2536: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2518: 2515: 2511: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2498: 2495: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2472: 2464: 2462: 2456: 2453: 2452: 2450: 2442: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2431: 2428: 2427: 2425: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2413: 2408: 2402: 2399: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2382: 2379: 2377: 2375: 2370: 2364: 2361: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2334: 2333: 2331: 2323: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2314: 2310: 2302: 2299: 2298: 2296: 2288: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2279: 2278: 2276: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2262: 2258: 2252: 2249: 2248: 2246: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2219: 2215: 2209: 2206:Admins (see : 2205: 2203: 2198: 2195: 2194: 2192: 2184: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2172: 2170: 2165: 2162: 2161: 2159: 2151: 2149: 2145: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2136: 2127: 2125: 2124: 2121: 2113: 2111: 2110: 2107: 2106:204.72.196.62 2102: 2101: 2098: 2097:66.67.107.143 2094: 2088: 2084: 2081: 2080: 2078: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2038: 2032: 2026: 2024: 2023: 2020: 2012: 2009: 2008: 2006: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1991: 1983: 1981: 1978: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1956: 1955: 1950: 1946: 1943: 1942: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1927: 1923: 1919: 1916: 1915: 1911: 1905: 1903: 1902: 1898: 1895: 1892: 1888: 1883: 1875: 1873: 1866: 1864: 1859: 1856: 1855: 1853: 1845: 1841: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1830: 1826: 1818: 1814: 1811: 1810: 1808: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1775: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1763: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1737:Coastalfields 1734: 1724:Coastalfields 1723: 1719: 1716: 1715: 1713: 1705: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1688: 1683: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1663: 1655: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1620: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1589: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1579: 1578: 1576: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1547:Parker Curtis 1544: 1538: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1511: 1502: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1483:Parker Curtis 1480: 1471: 1464: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1452: 1447: 1436: 1432: 1429: 1428: 1426: 1418: 1415: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1370: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1356: 1355:66.245.253.72 1352: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1317: 1311: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1288: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1239: 1232: 1229: 1224: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1215: 1214: 1212: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1198: 1193: 1188: 1184: 1176: 1172: 1169: 1168: 1166: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1121: 1114: 1112: 1111: 1108: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1081:Knights Ferry 1080: 1078: 1073: 1070: 1069: 1067: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1041: 1032: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1012:'s talk page. 1011: 1007: 1001: 999: 995: 987: 982: 975: 969: 966: 961: 960: 959: 958: 953: 950: 949: 947: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 930: 926: 922: 917: 915: 907: 903: 900: 899: 897: 889: 888: 887: 886: 883: 879: 875: 867: 865: 857: 854: 848:'s talk page. 847: 843: 837: 835: 831: 830:A Bathing Ape 823: 818: 811: 805: 802: 797: 796: 795: 792: 791: 789: 781: 777: 772: 771: 770: 769: 766: 762: 758: 749: 745: 742: 741: 739: 731: 730:bite spammers 727: 726: 725: 724: 721: 717: 713: 707: 706: 703: 699: 695: 694:Parker_Curtis 691: 690:192.249.47.11 683: 679: 676: 675: 673: 665: 661: 657: 654: 650: 646: 645: 644: 640: 636: 632: 628: 620: 617: 612: 609: 608: 607: 602: 599: 598: 597: 592: 589: 588: 587: 584: 579: 576: 575: 574: 569: 566: 564: 561: 560: 559: 556: 554: 553: 543: 539: 536: 535: 533: 524: 523: 522: 521: 518: 513: 505: 503: 500: 499: 496: 488: 484: 481: 480: 478: 470: 469: 468: 467: 464: 460: 457: 449: 445: 442: 441: 439: 431: 427: 422: 421: 420: 417: 413: 409: 405: 394: 388: 385: 380: 376: 375: 374: 371: 370: 368: 359: 355: 354:this cite tag 351: 350: 349: 348: 345: 340: 336: 329: 326: 322: 319: 318: 316: 308: 307: 306: 305: 302: 300: 299: 298: 288: 286: 281: 278: 277: 275: 267: 263: 259: 255: 254: 253: 250: 246: 242: 238: 229: 226: 225: 223: 215: 211: 210: 209: 207: 204: 201: 197: 192: 186: 183: 182: 180: 171: 170: 169: 166: 162: 158: 154: 143: 139: 136: 135: 133: 124: 123: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 98: 94: 92: 88: 84: 79: 72: 70: 66: 60: 58: 55: 51: 47: 46:83.93.196.231 43: 36: 35:Best regards 33: 26: 19: 3515: 3508: 3493: 3487: 3484: 3478:I had added 3477: 3460: 3453: 3450: 3395: 3371: 3324: 3311: 3285: 3265: 3245: 3229:88.106.227.9 3220: 3200: 3176: 3162: 3147: 3137: 3134: 3132:== Hi James 3131: 3128: 3102: 3099:The WikiGame 3094: 3091: 3076: 3062: 3047: 3037: 3034: 3019: 3012: 2997: 2994: 2965: 2945: 2930: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2902: 2885:75.43.142.65 2875: 2855: 2827: 2826: 2817: 2788: 2787: 2782:current rank 2779: 2760: 2756: 2728: 2717: 2709: 2695: 2673: 2655: 2647:user:h4xx0rz 2636: 2628: 2618: 2607:Modelwatcher 2603: 2596: 2593: 2573: 2556:Liza Hausman 2553: 2533:And again. 2469:Thank you. 2468: 2459: 2444: 2434: 2419: 2407:86.144.41.98 2403: 2400: 2385: 2369:86.144.41.98 2365: 2362: 2347: 2325: 2313:Systemofdisw 2311: 2307: 2290: 2270: 2259: 2255: 2240: 2216: 2213: 2201: 2186: 2176: 2168: 2153: 2148:The Guardian 2131: 2120:Irongargoyle 2117: 2103: 2095: 2092: 2072: 2042: 2030: 2015: 2000: 1987: 1979: 1966:Seventhcroak 1957: 1951: 1947: 1944: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1924: 1920: 1917: 1912: 1909: 1893: 1879: 1870: 1862: 1847: 1843: 1822: 1819:Jeffree Star 1802: 1781: 1772: 1757: 1727: 1707: 1677: 1657: 1624: 1570: 1536: 1505: 1472: 1468: 1440: 1420: 1413: 1374: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1321: 1282: 1266:Seventhcroak 1257: 1252: 1249: 1246: 1243: 1240: 1237: 1206: 1180: 1160: 1122: 1118: 1084: 1076: 1061: 1036: 1003: 992:The article 991: 941: 924: 918: 911: 891: 877: 871: 863: 839: 828:The article 827: 783: 753: 733: 708: 687: 667: 621: 618: 615: 605: 595: 585: 582: 572: 557: 550: 547: 527: 511: 509: 501: 492: 472: 453: 433: 430:Panic attack 398: 362: 357: 332: 310: 296: 295: 292: 284: 269: 232: 217: 202: 193: 189: 174: 147: 127: 99: 95: 80: 76: 67: 64: 61:Fuck Article 37: 34: 30: 3388:this is not 2879:—Preceding 2643:user:h4xx0r 2639:user:h4xx0r 1887:Pastordavid 1704:Andrew Weil 1477:—Preceding 1437:75.75.4.134 1349:—Preceding 1307:Pastordavid 1033:Steve Niles 1017:PocKleanBot 882:EarthPerson 872:Looks like 625:—Preceding 517:Nehrams2020 408:Guymadison 395:Panic links 103:—Preceding 87:Daily Candy 3193:verifiable 2763:statistics 2706:checkusers 2666:Check user 2146:, as does 1788:NickelShoe 1501:calculator 1107:JeffMGreen 1093:JeffMGreen 631:Workbloom 352:Regarding 268:policies. 157:PSBennett 3456:Webmaster 3191:It's not 2535:KP Botany 2514:KP Botany 2494:KP Botany 2481:KP Botany 2471:KP Botany 2135:SqueakBox 2019:SqueakBox 1990:SqueakBox 1906:Heads-Off 1867:Vandalism 1838:that met 1465:highersat 1371:Wikilogos 1054:WP:LIVING 512:Anchorman 506:San Diego 328:Christmas 241:PSBennett 196:PSBennett 3497:itsJamie 3412:WP:POINT 3399:itsJamie 3392:WP:POINT 3375:itsJamie 3368:WP:POINT 3341:WP:POINT 3328:itsJamie 3320:WP:POINT 3303:WP:POINT 3289:itsJamie 3249:itsJamie 3237:contribs 3225:unsigned 3204:itsJamie 3151:itsJamie 3144:spamming 3119:contribs 3107:unsigned 3080:itsJamie 3051:itsJamie 3023:itsJamie 3001:itsJamie 2982:contribs 2970:unsigned 2949:itsJamie 2906:itsJamie 2893:contribs 2881:unsigned 2872:Question 2852:Question 2677:itsJamie 2577:itsJamie 2448:itsJamie 2423:itsJamie 2404:Regards, 2366:Regards, 2329:itsJamie 2294:itsJamie 2274:itsJamie 2244:itsJamie 2237:WP:BLOCK 2190:itsJamie 2173:The Game 2157:itsJamie 2128:Cannabis 2076:itsJamie 2060:contribs 2052:Toojburn 2048:unsigned 2004:itsJamie 1974:contribs 1962:unsigned 1897:contribs 1876:Heads-up 1851:itsJamie 1825:User:Zoe 1806:itsJamie 1761:itsJamie 1745:contribs 1733:unsigned 1711:itsJamie 1661:itsJamie 1641:contribs 1629:unsigned 1595:unsigned 1574:itsJamie 1555:contribs 1543:unsigned 1509:itsJamie 1491:contribs 1479:unsigned 1424:itsJamie 1417:contribs 1381:proposal 1363:contribs 1351:unsigned 1286:itsJamie 1274:contribs 1262:unsigned 1210:itsJamie 1164:itsJamie 1140:contribs 1128:unsigned 1101:contribs 1089:unsigned 1065:itsJamie 1044:ColScott 1040:ColScott 945:itsJamie 895:itsJamie 787:itsJamie 737:itsJamie 696:to spam 671:itsJamie 639:contribs 627:unsigned 531:itsJamie 476:itsJamie 437:itsJamie 416:contribs 404:unsigned 366:itsJamie 314:itsJamie 273:itsJamie 249:contribs 237:unsigned 221:itsJamie 206:contribs 178:itsJamie 165:contribs 153:unsigned 131:itsJamie 117:contribs 105:unsigned 42:unsigned 38:Kenneth 3488:--Mjas 3451:Hello, 2942:WP:CORP 2771:March 2 2718:Prodego 2657:H4xx0rz 2605:Thanks! 2566:WP:SPAM 2441:WP:SPAM 2233:WP:SOCK 1754:WP:ISBN 1537:7 links 1227:Tropics 1196:Tropics 1157:WP:SPAM 1010:article 998:cleanup 846:article 834:cleanup 780:WP:SPAM 664:WP:SPAM 383:Tropics 343:Tropics 266:WP:SPAM 3276:Hamz01 3073:WP:BIO 3069:WP:NOT 3044:Laptop 2991:WP:NOT 2974:Rpm826 2633:Block? 2261:Albott 2218:Albott 2114:Thanks 1840:WP:BIO 1829:(talk) 1782:Since 1654:WP:BIO 1633:Wagesb 1504:spam. 965:crl620 929:crl620 761:1Nevis 720:Exeunt 702:Exeunt 495:EOBeav 463:Riurik 3217:Links 2989:From 2615:Block 2594:hey, 2570:WP:EL 2089:Sorry 1984:Cites 1588:WP:EL 1567:WP:EL 1153:WP:EL 1132:Leesw 925:never 776:WP:EL 757:Nevis 660:WP:EL 653:WP:EL 552:clear 262:WP:EL 214:WP:EL 16:< 3495:OhNo 3397:OhNo 3373:OhNo 3326:OhNo 3305:and 3287:OhNo 3247:OhNo 3233:talk 3202:OhNo 3149:OhNo 3115:talk 3078:OhNo 3071:and 3049:OhNo 3021:OhNo 2999:OhNo 2978:talk 2962:Obit 2947:OhNo 2904:OhNo 2889:talk 2775:2006 2711:here 2675:OhNo 2645:and 2575:OhNo 2446:OhNo 2421:OhNo 2327:OhNo 2292:OhNo 2272:OhNo 2242:OhNo 2235:and 2188:OhNo 2155:OhNo 2074:OhNo 2056:talk 2002:OhNo 1970:talk 1891:talk 1849:OhNo 1804:OhNo 1792:Talk 1759:OhNo 1741:talk 1709:OhNo 1659:OhNo 1652:See 1637:talk 1603:talk 1572:OhNo 1551:talk 1507:OhNo 1487:talk 1422:OhNo 1411:talk 1359:talk 1303:Here 1284:OhNo 1270:talk 1223:Doc 1208:OhNo 1192:Doc 1183:here 1162:OhNo 1155:and 1136:talk 1097:talk 1063:OhNo 943:OhNo 893:OhNo 785:OhNo 735:OhNo 669:OhNo 635:talk 606:and 529:OhNo 474:OhNo 435:OhNo 428:and 412:talk 379:Doc 364:OhNo 358:very 339:Doc 312:OhNo 271:OhNo 264:and 245:talk 219:OhNo 200:talk 176:OhNo 161:talk 129:OhNo 113:talk 50:talk 3270:of 2841:¿п? 2836:.D. 2802:¿п? 2797:.D. 2568:or 2388:GMT 2350:GMT 1445:Hús 801:Pia 778:or 765:Pia 89:or 3513:. 3431:) 3390:a 3360:) 3239:). 3235:• 3199:. 3146:. 3121:) 3117:• 2993:: 2984:). 2980:• 2936:" 2895:) 2891:• 2863:) 2777:. 2773:, 2733:. 2727:, 2672:. 2572:. 2414:) 2376:) 2324:. 2289:. 2185:. 2062:) 2058:• 1976:). 1972:• 1899:) 1794:) 1747:). 1743:• 1694:. 1643:) 1639:• 1605:) 1557:) 1553:• 1493:) 1489:• 1455:nd 1387:, 1365:) 1361:• 1276:). 1272:• 1142:) 1138:• 1105:-- 1099:• 641:) 637:• 418:). 414:• 251:). 247:• 208:) 167:). 163:• 119:) 115:• 52:) 3427:☓ 3422:☎ 3418:( 3356:☓ 3351:☎ 3347:( 3231:( 3125:. 3113:( 2976:( 2887:( 2831:S 2828:— 2792:S 2789:— 2410:( 2372:( 2210:) 2066:. 2054:( 1968:( 1894:· 1889:( 1827:| 1790:( 1739:( 1691:o 1686:e 1681:G 1647:. 1635:( 1609:. 1601:( 1561:. 1549:( 1485:( 1450:ö 1414:· 1409:( 1357:( 1268:( 1146:. 1134:( 1095:( 1023:. 1000:. 836:. 662:/ 633:( 410:( 243:( 203:· 198:( 159:( 111:( 56:. 48:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index