Knowledge

User talk:Oldtimesake

Source đź“ť

107: 25: 162:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
121:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 130: 114: 66: 32: 74: 122: 138: 142: 150: 31:
Hello, and welcome to Knowledge. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to
155: 134: 133:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
118: 59: 77: 92: 126: 172: 88: 48: 44: 36: 159: 47:, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please 167:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 168: 129:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
106: 52: 176: 96: 55:, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again. 24: 158:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 105: 23: 35:
have been undone by an automated computer program called
70: 65:
The following is the log entry regarding this message:
149:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
141:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 83:
ANN scored at 0.918025 on 2021-03-15T19:09:16+00:00
165:even if you do not violate the three-revert rule 125:to work toward making a version that represents 8: 117:shows that you are currently engaged in an 115:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon 67:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon 33:General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon 7: 14: 154:—especially if you violate the 131:the bold, revert, discuss cycle 113:Your recent editing history at 1: 58:For help, take a look at the 177:03:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC) 192: 97:19:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC) 43:ClueBot NG makes very few 110: 28: 109: 27: 151:blocked from editing 139:dispute resolution 111: 29: 156:three-revert rule 183: 191: 190: 186: 185: 184: 182: 181: 180: 143:page protection 104: 22: 12: 11: 5: 189: 187: 103: 100: 85: 84: 63: 56: 53:report it here 21: 18: 16: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 188: 179: 178: 174: 170: 166: 161: 157: 153: 152: 146: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 108: 101: 99: 98: 94: 90: 82: 79: 76: 72: 68: 64: 61: 57: 54: 50: 49:read about it 46: 42: 41: 40: 38: 34: 26: 19: 17: 164: 148: 147: 112: 102:October 2021 87:Thank you. 86: 80: 60:introduction 30: 15: 135:noticeboard 75:Oldtimesake 89:ClueBot NG 37:ClueBot NG 20:March 2021 127:consensus 123:talk page 163:warring— 137:or seek 119:edit war 45:mistakes 160:reverts 71:changed 169:BilCat 173:talk 93:talk 69:was 145:. 81:(t) 78:(u) 73:by 175:) 95:) 51:, 39:. 171:( 91:( 62:.

Index


General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
ClueBot NG
mistakes
read about it
report it here
introduction
General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
changed
Oldtimesake
(u)
(t)
ClueBot NG
talk
19:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Stop icon
General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
edit war
talk page
consensus
the bold, revert, discuss cycle
noticeboard
dispute resolution
page protection
blocked from editing
three-revert rule
reverts
BilCat
talk
03:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑