User talk:OneGuy/Archive 3

1255: 1196: 622: 1120: 840: 912: 1279:

been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Knowledge policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Knowledge

521:

status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually

1217:, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 263:

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. It looks like you're not active anymore, but if you come back and are at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in

124:

of work. I've taken a good crack at it, but its not an area I know anything about. I toned down the extremely npov text that I started from, but I don't know how much the claims of the importance of its religious scholarship, in particular, are justified. TIA --

1210:, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space. 1227:) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit 268:? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. I've marked you on this list as "inactve". Feel free to update this as well. Thanks. -- 298:

Hello. On Nov. 1, 2004 you wrote something on the Allah page about a Christian inscription using Allah. Can you give me your source? A friend of mine doesn't believe it--and he has been there. You can e-mail me from my user page.

1063: 996: 1146: 382:

in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

417:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on

855: 809:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

767:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

1134:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 891:. It has been said that you are the owner of the image and you have released the work on Knowledge, if you have please edit the page of the image or comment back on the review, thanks! 1275:, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Knowledge administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you 1145:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

482:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 340:

I think this may be yours, and its aboput to be deleted because of no source. If you know where it came from, I would very much apreciate if you wrote that on its page. Thanks.

478:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

220:

Possible vandalism. He faked the reason for the edit in the edit history as well. I wanted to notify you of this, and I want you to decide whether or not to keep or delete it.

562:

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following

1057: 990: 525:

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the

1272: 858:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 672:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 467:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 424:. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 801:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 759:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 513: 471:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see

522:

sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

411: 1267:

by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Knowledge account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at

1220: 924: 884: 575: 201: 813: 806: 771: 764: 571: 487: 479: 425: 213: 142: 459:. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Knowledge and may only be used on Knowledge under a 805:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

763:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

329: 679: 669: 655: 633: 615: 817: 775: 591: 429: 647: 333: 230: 265: 1268: 812:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

770:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

1271:, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with 1109: 1078: 1011: 403: 941: 556: 552: 1045: 978: 546: 455: 388: 370: 31:

You got me while I was tired, and I fell for it all the way. I have been trolled. I have lost. I will have a nice day. --

847: 152: 379: 168: 322: 410:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,

1127: 802: 760: 651: 248: 1185: 1039: 972: 880: 873: 851: 209: 1214: 949: 825: 797: 755: 689: 629: 252: 177: 931:

policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure

47:

Nobody - Dante Alighieri screwed up an edit and duplicated a large section of the page. It's being fixed now.

173:

to rename articles that use the pejorative term "Conspiracy theory" to denigrate the content of the article.

1264: 1229: 1035: 968: 685: 641: 176:

Do the titles of WP articles generally pass partisan judgment on the subject under discussion? Should they?

65: 58: 854:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 205: 737: 1170:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1085: 1018: 678:

Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate

637: 517:. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the 1233:

to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

116:

I saw that you did the original Maldives article, so I thought you might be willing to take a look at

1290: 1175: 1135: 274: 69: 608:

But you fails to add this newspaper, believes nowithstandig in Morey Theories on Allah as God Moon.

198:

Calling yourself an atheist is a bad way of hiding the fact that you are an Islamic Fundamentalist.

1071: 1004: 821: 779: 939:. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 936: 579: 540: 529: 472: 375: 1238: 1203: 1189: 1131: 1113: 1099: 932: 302: 94: 1051: 984: 1156:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

896: 149: 17: 609: 412:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license

1286: 1171: 1026: 959: 864: 507:

Unspecified source for Image:Abbasid Provinces during the caliphate of Harun al-Rashid.JPG

269: 105: 76: 714: 496: 468: 438: 234: 221: 36: 1206:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under the 1126:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

732:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Islam_by_country#Maximum_percentage_of_Muslim_in_Ethiopia

1207: 1167: 1160:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

1157: 1150: 1139: 928: 916: 673: 668:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting

585: 247:

Anyone who is interested in voting one way or the other is invited to the discussion

51: 1234: 1095: 460: 341: 126: 97:? I believe the meaning you intend is not yet covered by the disambiguation page 568:

Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged

1294: 1242: 1179: 1103: 945:

article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the

900: 892: 867: 829: 782: 740: 728:

Please see here in the talk page of Islam by country and we need your opinions:

717: 703: 692: 598: 595: 501: 464: 443: 354: 351: 344: 315: 312: 305: 287: 284: 237: 224: 180: 155: 146: 138: 1119: 839: 621: 860: 711: 328: 73: 518: 491: 433: 32: 731: 654:

from Knowledge. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because

374:. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under 48: 911: 120:. It was an article I spotted on the new articles list, and it needed 117: 688:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --

514:

Image:Abbasid Provinces during the caliphate of Harun al-Rashid.JPG

1147:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Nuh Ha Mim Keller (2nd nomination)

888: 327: 141:

in the past, I thought you might like to contribute an opinion at

658:

fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

536: 449:

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Papua, Indonesian province.JPG)

229:

I looked further into the IP and it seems to be registered to

98: 1253: 1194: 1118: 856:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Robert Reynolds (journalist)

838: 620: 406:, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. 243:

Ed Poor has been kind enough to nominate me for an adminship

397:

without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template

791:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:06 sugarray 250s.JPG

749:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:06 sugarray 250s.JPG

610:

http://www.pakistanchristianpost.com/sfdetails.php?id=52

915:

Hello OneGuy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a

563: 420: 72:

was received. Your perspective would be most welcome.

1070: 1003: 559:

for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

428:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 816:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 774:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 680: