User talk:Otolemur crassicaudatus

2196:

behaving similarly. I don't even know if it is worth it to contribute anymore. I just came from a meeting where we were actually seeking Him to show us how to rehabilitate 120 destiture women that were saved from temple prostitution. And the thought came to my mind about the aggressive editors and whether they would even care to enter their hands into this dirt and getting involved with restoring broken lives. I am not sure. I am sorry to vent on you but I may not be able to carry forward with reporting and providing much inputs to this article anymore. I will try but cannot be sure. there does not appear to be any sense in it. I guess I am losing inspiration. Do you think it is worth it? Keep up the good work on your contributions. I appreciate your desire to act fairly and in a non-partisan manner.

4984:"Science fiction film of India". It refers to a genre of films, which are not very popular in the country. The article has no sources saying that these are the only films ever made. In fact, a category or a template would be a much better option than keep an article, as some films have not received much of a notice and some have. If anyone wants to highlight the fact that xXx is a science fiction film, all they have to do is add the category or template to it. To put it short, this article has no significance to highlight a specific genre of films. 1037:; I'm sure someone there will either be able to tell you if a given topic is one that might not need images, or give you some suggestions on what to add or what you should look for in an image. FA discussions don't give much weight to concerns that aren't 'actionable', so if there genuinely are no image possibilities for an otherwise FA-worthy article, I would imagine - not being an FA reviewer myself - that the article would probably pass. But you'll probably get a better answer at the FAC talk page. -- 47: 3623:

reject a nomination and delete it—if a nomination has been rejected, it must be deleted by a different reviewer to ensure that at least two people have considered it); any time you see that your nomination is gone, you need to check the Next Update before assuming it has been deleted. If there was a green or gray check mark next to it before it was deleted, that means it was accepted and will have been moved into the queue. —

5739: 5693: 5531: 5473: 5425: 5377: 5138: 5082: 3711: 2571: 2348: 2287: 2220: 2080: 1748: 1423: 1362: 900: 537: 5636: 5579: 5331: 4965: 4661: 4079: 3297: 21: 4876: 4086: 4072: 4237: 4409: 4036: 3025: 4093: 4783: 5788: 2415: 1057:

and should be retained if at all possible. The second is less essential and the article wouldn't suffer much fron its loss. I see from the talkpage that you have heavyweights such as Awadewit and Elcobbola in on the discussion, and I would be much guided by them. Hope this helps (though I doubt it does - sorry).

345:. Basically I see them as a good instrastructure to develop each of the economies on wikipedia. It gives us the chance to link case studies on many of the main exports/industries in the country was is very important as a vast proportion of the population is often involved in such industries. See for example 3434:"Kaltio is a main Finnish magazine cultural magazine." Right. So what issue, what page number, where is the online reference? Why not just say that you saw it on TV? A reference should include enough information for other editors to easily verify your content in ENGLISH. Your references did not do this. 4930:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

3820:

But sir this is not kind of any advertisement and i am trying to expand Wikiepdia with my knowledge as Property Standard is a magazine IN pakistan Lahore and i gave the reference of thier website aswell, I am sure people would benfit from what i wrote about this magazine, I will be gratefl if you Put

2507:

has contacted him, but with no difference to his conduct; moreover, how does one try to resolve the problem when, in essence, he just needs to stop? I guess my question is, has enough been done to satisfy this requirement as of yet, or do additional steps need to be taken? Finally, if you agree with

2497:

have been repeatedly reinserting it (and finding new POV bits to insert). Jobxavier is the worst offender, and, to be frank, his conduct leads me to desire to bring a RfC regarding him. You're more experienced than I, so I was wondering if firstly, you think this is the appropriate action; secondly,

876:

There must have been a poultry factory there at least. I think the town was set up as just a factory with barracks for the workers, but apparently it's a separate municipality. I don't think the factory still works, on Google Maps it looks like most of it has been demolished. But the houses are still

3622:

and the queues within it before you re-nominate articles; your nomination passed AfD this morning and was moved back into the queue immediately after the nomination was pass. Nominations are never simply deleted from DYK (in fact, there is an unwritten rule that the same user is not allowed to both

2038:

I specifically did not add in a reference to my edit as a fact like this is easily checked against official sources, such as the NSW government website. I am a wikipedian whose personal style is one of resisting over-referencing as otherwise all articles will become awkward to read and cumbersome.

704:

Death and Devil". "Tabak und Krebs" = "Tobacco and cancer". The lobster (crab) on the upper image fits because the German word "Krebs" can mean "cancer" or "crab". "Propaganda Musika" = "propaganda with music" (Musika is a poetic variation of the word Musik - music). "So appetitlich frisch" (written

659:

Hello, I am sorry to say that I am not familiar with the subject of V-Day or National Vagina Day but you could always add NVD to the V-Day article, saying "on February 14, V-Day organizes an event in order to inform society of violence against women..." or something like that. Other than that, thats

3685:

Hi Otolemur. :) Would it be alright if I setup an archive bot for your talkpage? I noticed that the page is very long, over 160K, and some people's browsers start having trouble with anything over 32K. But I could setup a bot which would automatically archive any threads which had been inactive

1136:

The machine-translated page definitely isn't reliable, since it's virtually impossible to understand :-) Foreign language pages can be suitable as reliable sources, but sorry to say I can't help you, as I don't understand (1) the German original, or (2) the machine-translated English. You'll have

1056:

I am flattered that you contacted me over this, but I doubt I can be of much help, since my knowlege of image protocols is non-existent - I am frequently in trouble over my image choices, constantly having to delete, etc. For what it's worth, in my opinion your first image is central to the article

243:

As far as I can tell, tables are not discussed by the Manual of Style, and the only style guideline merely discusses when tables should and shouldn't be used. Unless I've overlooked something, it's my opinion that there's not any sort of mandatory rule of style to be followed with regard to tables.

4919:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be

2739:

The reason there is soapboxing on the Masonic ritual AfD is because there is no difference in the material in this article from the material in the Freemasonry article aside from the Christian controversy section. Therefore, the article was broken out specifically to add this criticism, which is

1639:

It was tagged as lacking a source, it now has a source, so there's no immeadiate possibility of deletion. The source's copyright is really unclear, though, and probably not strictly acceptable. Notably, images used here need to be both modifiable and commercially useable, it's not clear that it

2195:

Thanks my friend for supporting on semi protection. I don't know you but it is terribly tough to find people to discuss and communicate on Knowledge (XXG). It appears to be a mad rush. No one bothers to ask questions or correct you. Everyone wants to have their own POV. I am afraid I may also be

1296:

My only concern about your edit is that it reads "Jewish Terrorism" and then "Palestinian Political Violence". Either Jewish Terrorism should be merged into "Jewish Political Violence" or "Palestinian Political Violence" should be moved to "Palestinian Terrorism." Besides that, I don't see a big

3930:

Hello there. A few weeks back, you made what I felt was an insensitive reply to a post on the RefDesk and I replied to you with some rather impolite remarks of my own. In the time since then I've come to realize that while your reply might have been a little brusque, mine was extremely rude and

3887:

was also settup following the accident in order to raise money for memorials to those killed. I figured since The Boys in Red seemed to be an almost universally accepted name for the accident in Canada that it seemed suitable as an article title on Knowledge (XXG). Do you have suggestions for a

856:

Hello. Generally I like this image, and think it meets the criteria needed for nomination. You know, always users who will oppose the promotion to the FP will appear, but you can nominate it surely. Some objections might target the resolution of this image, generally FPs tend to be larger. -

4595:, we have established an "inactive" list. As your account has not edited for over 4 months, I am sorry to imform you that you're being moved to the list. If you wish to refute this and are indeed active, I am sorry for the mistake and you can revert my action. Thank you and happy holidays, 1534:

But more importantly, I think the topic of child abuse is too broad to be depicted with an image; by using an image it can distract, or divert the attention from the important concepts in the text, lots of which can't be shown because they are psychological/emotional/developmental, etc.

830:. If this one had been, chances are it would have been deleted - you are right that stub types for plants aren't split on a by-country basis, they are always split by taxon, and indeed there is a large hierarchy of such stub types already in existence. The stub type is currently listed at 3931:

completely uncalled for. I have also seen your many knowledgeable replies to other questions and I realize that I could have driven off a valuable contributor with a hasty edit of ill-chosen words. Frankly, I'm a little embarrassed by my outburst; I normally try to conduct myself with a

1271:

yeah, that's another reason that I've not removed it. Most of the larger newspaper info is in 'newsbank archives' and I've not had a chance to log in through my county library system to see those full articles. I guess it comes down to if playing around the country is notable enough.

403:

Thanks for bringing it to me, I indef'd and left the username tag. You're right, we don't allow "bot" in the username as it could cause confusion. And if it were a new bot account they would've tagged it as such instantly. Also, quick question, why'd you bring it to me? Thanks again.

1297:

problem with its inclusion. If it were included, I would rather see the article be reorganized such that there is a section on organized crime, a section on general crime, and then a section on terrorism/political violence. That sort of reorganization should probably happen anyways.

2639:

I'd move Dragon Bridge.jpg (the detail of just the dragon) to the left side (so the dragon faces into the article) and just under the "Architecture" header. That section seems to be the primary place where the inclusion of the statues as a design element should be discussed.

3040: 691:

translation of the part between: Dürer's famous engraving "The Knight, Death, and the Devil" praises the heroic human, who in constant contact with death strongly clings to live, and leads the demon in his own chest into the fight against a world full of

2744:

other articles (and of the six sources used, three are in that one section). That makes it a negative advocacy problem, which is especially egregious because the criticisms leveled are generic and have nothing to do with anything in the article itself.

3656:. In retrospect, it probably would have been wise for us to post a prominent notice on the DYK nominations page to let nominators know about the new process, since a lot of people are regular nominators but don't pay watch the other discussion page. — 2643:

And I'd lose Image:Zmajski most-Ljubljana.JPG. I'ts a good image, but unless there is a discussion about the design on the bulwark, it's redundant to the sculpture image. And it won;t be lost since it looks like it's included in the Commons gallery.

493:

I don't know why that IP keep removing that information. That section is very well sourced. If he keep doing i will ask the admins to do something regarding it. Yea you may be right. It is maybe a socks. We can ask admins to look into it?. Should we

1237:

an editor felt that the article didn't sufficiently show that she passed the music/band guideline. I was going to remove it a bit later today. A larger issue that I've come across in preparing that article is the woeful state of many articles on

4456:

on the top of the page and leave a note on ] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

4174:

The Fort Dearborn article was moved yesterday without discussion. I've put out a request to have it moved back to its original location. As you've edited the Fort Dearborn article in the passed, please weigh in on the discussion on the current

349:

and how the template is used. Any help you can give on building up the templates with potential articles related to the economy, distributing the templates in the articles linked or filling in the red links for be much appreciated! For instance

5164:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

5108:

5647: 4932: 4908:, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 5342: 2826:

At what area do you inquire about a reliable source for the article? All I did was add more info on his playing career per hockeydb.com, as I would do to any player bio with just two or three lines in it, just to expand it a little bit.

5590: 3151:"Websites and online publications are normally listed in the "External links" section instead of in this section, although editors occasionally prefer to merge very short lists of publications and external links into this section." 2018:

I'll take it out if its not appropriate - I wasn't sure if Cat:spiders was deathly serious for biological specimens only, or if it allowed any kind of spider, artistic depictions of and that sort of thing. I guess its the former!!

3539:, respectively. Although good arguments exist that aspects of both topics are pseudoscientific, WP requires a particular threshold for using the pseudoscience category, per the ArbCom decision that is now part of NPOV (shortcut: 4330: 3547:. Specifically, we need a V RS showing that a given topic is "generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community". Examples of such sources include statements by official scientific bodies such as those found at 380:

I think it will start to take shape. It is a lot of work for sure, but it is an area that need covering and an important one at that but will be done gradually and the templates are the first step to connect them together.

1923:

I issued him three warnings for the three different pages he vandalized. I did not report him to the AIV, but I was about to report him if he vandalized any article again after the only warning. But he is already blocked.

371:

Ahh lost my longer message to you in a cut and paste mess up. Not sure about Western Sahara as it is connected to Morocco but I think a series on banking or the stock market in each of the African countries is possible -

2502:

that "at least two editors must have contacted the user on their talk page, or the talk pages involved in the dispute, and tried but failed to resolve the problem"? I mean to say, I've contacted him; to a lesser extent

5112:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

1173: 5168:

5287:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2899:, we use nouns and noun-phrases for article titles, not adjectives. So a general survey on the relationships between Christianity and Judaism (a topic this encyclopedia should certainly cover) should be called 446:

It probably would've been better as those admins over there would be more experienced with dealing with usernames. But it was fine to bring it to me this time :-) Good job. (P.S. I meant, how did you find me?)

267:

See bot hit on my talk page. Why is that image orphaned? It directly pertains to the article it was in and it illustraties the subject of the article. Critical commentary is not required. Resspond on my talk

1584:. I have put a lot of effort to find RS. However, it is becoming a challenge. Your inputs and guidance would be much appreciated. Also, could you please put this page in your watch list for the next4 weeks? 834:, where just those points have been made (this page is used as a half-way stage before deciding whether an unproposed stub type is adopted or sent to SFD). Feel free to make any comments you wish to there. 5161: 5105: 3333:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

1152: 679:

Hi there, you wrote: "Hi, can you please translate what is written here below the three separate images". The lower part of the image uploaded by you shows an engraving of famous German medieval painter

5200:

so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--

1810:

could you please look into kashmir clouds edit history as he is blatantly vote stacking to gain votes from indian editors to keep the POK page i dont know how to deal with canvassing so could you help?

4068:

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

2140:

statement, then it's probably okay — but if it's a more complicated statement that delves into actual crime stats, then you'd probably be better off tracking down the sources that Lonely Planet used.

4562: 5750: 5731: 5707: 5441: 5393: 4688:

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

3002: 2876: 3229: 3548: 4538: 3652:

of a new bot to automate DYK postings. So things are a little different now than what you may have been used to, and the discussions about the new process are pretty much buried deep in

1501:

They quite possibly can be the same person, but as they have stopped their disruptive editing, I think we can let it go. If they vandalise further on the account, they will be blocked. –

5744:

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

5807: 5244: 4355: 5547: 5489: 4429: 3883:

Hi just a little answer to your question. Boys in Red was coined by numerous new organisations after the accident in reference to the players killed in the accident. A fund titled

5839: 5242:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 4632:

Hi Otolemur.This article have been kept.And now nominated again Articles for deletion.Some users demonstrate preconceived opinion.If you have time, could you take a look at the

4016:

article referring to the largest slum, which in my view is not a credible source). I think if the anonymous user keeps on editing like this, warnings should perhaps be filed.--

5834: 4012:

Hi, keep an eye on these two articles will you. The anonymous user 60.50.67.78 has been adding repetitive statements and sometimes dubious links (a travel review site to the

2047: 5658:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

5601:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

5353:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

4280:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click

1011: 2918:

exists, as its own hatnote declares, is specifically to survey the history and use of that word-phrase -- which has its own controversy, and its own tale to tell. (See

831: 342: 4682: 4058: 3292:

to my userpage. Today was the first time I met you during reverting vandalism, and I must say you're pretty fast :) You beat me to it several times. Have a cookie.

1531:

The image was a photo of the result of general violence; although a child was hurt, it does not illustrate the topic of child abuse, it illustrates war or rioting.

2042:

However if you would like to add in your own references to this article regarding the elevation of Ms Keneally to a new portfolio, I point you in the direction of

4270:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 4674:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the 1034: 4716:

As you may know, the project is inactive, but I just joined. I thought that we should verify that each member is active. If you want to keep being in this

3574: 3567: 5150: 5094: 4350: 5655: 5639: 5628: 3577:

and made a lot of changes so that hopefully the {{Multiple issues| synthesis = August 2008| unbalanced = August 2008| POV = March 2008}} can be removed. --

74: 69: 64: 223:

either way. As long as the purpose and meaning of the table is explained somehow, just do whatever makes more sense to you — there's no right or wrong.

5598: 5582: 5571: 3738:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2598:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2375:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2314:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2247:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2107:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1775:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1450:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1389:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 927:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 564:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 354:

has some notable content already but potentially these templates can be crammed full with articles related to the economy by African country. Regards

346: 5037: 4865: 4416: 4402: 4398: 3005:

about the article in its present form, so the best way forward is a question that needs some thought. Please feel welcome to come and participate!

1072: 2457:

Good job on this! While we all have had our disagreements, I think we can both agree that you've done an excellant job here. Congrats! Your friend

4851: 4821: 4217: 2922:

where I've set things out in a bit more detail.) That story is a good fit for its own article, and will get completely lost if the contents of

2039:

However I do favour referencing where the statement in question may be controversial or is otherwise subject to conjecture (not the case here).

596:

On a slight diversion... it's good to talk to the person who is responsible for Knowledge (XXG) recognition of "National Cleavage Day"! *grins*

5435:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the 5387:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the 4202: 5755: 5712: 5552: 5494: 5446: 5398: 5249: 4732: 4523: 4360: 1007: 979: 5511: 4803: 3498: 3469: 2460: 1317: 261: 5798: 5780: 4740: 4515: 4342: 2919: 1621:

You posted on my talk page. Did you mean to do that? I can't see any speedy delete tag. It's a Commons image, so any deletion will be there.

5431: 5416: 5383: 5368: 5312: 3402:

Sorry for the vandilisim. I got confused. I tryed to edit the previous vandalisim and i must have accidently red did it. I am VERY sorry.

2674: 1812: 1615: 1580:

You once mentioned that I could request you for help. Could you please help me deal with the appropriateness of deleting External links on

4614: 4337: 4633: 4506: 4498: 4379: 4267: 4256: 4248: 4230: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 5210: 5016: 2960: 2433:

I hereby award Otolemur crassicaudatus the 25 DYK medal for some interesting and varied contributions to grace the main page. Cheers,

5041: 4671: 4592: 3418: 1445: 4710: 2499: 3772: 1326: 1215: 791: 767: 742: 5350: 5334: 5323: 4461: 4441: 3980: 27: 5308: 5238: 4346: 3839: 3666: 3633: 3606: 2988: 2717: 2002: 1979: 252: 5698: 5684: 4885: 1875:

You gave him a 3rd warning, a last warning, and an only warning (and then reported him to AIV) when he had stopped editing.

2974: 2444: 2396: 2268: 1169: 5029: 4976: 4954: 219:

generally like them better with a title caption whenever possible, but it's ultimately up to editor discretion — there's no

201:

Captions aren't mandatory, as such, but they're generally a good idea so that the reader understands what the table is for.

1599:

I just responded to the image statement on my talk. Thanks for your guidance. I am trying to be as reasonable as possible.

4972: 4958: 4176: 3032: 2995: 2935: 809: 324:

It was a vandal ... reverted back to an earlier version. I'm going to look further to see if semi-protection's in order.

5033: 4252: 3174:

Just dropped in to say good work on this article. You have significantly improved the article started yesterday by me. --

1003: 4759: 3952: 3693: 3451: 3380: 3202: 2678: 1983: 1926: 1859: 609: 593:

That's a good point. I haven't kept abreast of this news story - if you know better than I do then feel free to revert.

464: 426: 300: 5299:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

5154: 5098: 4675: 4537:

for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

4444:, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add 4144: 4116:

You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here:

3036: 627:

this morning - initial stup articles being created at present. Further information to follow. Thanks for the prompt. --

5304: 5061: 4922: 4846: 4816: 4695: 4621: 4212: 3908: 3768: 2525:

My name was added to the conflict resolution area . Is this the right place to be? I seek your counsel. As always :).

1942:

OK, sorry for the misunderstanding. I wasn't sure about it. (and I misread the AIV report.) Bad mistake on my part.

1322: 5745: 5702: 5542: 5484: 5436: 5388: 4892: 2807:. The amalgamation was very unpopular with Eaglehawk residents. Some pictures of the Eaglehawk area can be seen at 1559:

Knowledge (XXG) is an illustrated work, so a picture/pictures is/are appropriate. No view on this particular image.

3739: 2599: 2376: 2315: 2248: 2108: 1776: 1451: 1390: 928: 700:

The Nazis created a variation of this Dürer engraving title, to be used in their non-smoking campaign: "The Knight

565: 3070: 1019:

So, yeah, in general there should be at lease some images, but the number and type will depend on the article. --

999: 5507: 5174: 5118: 4901: 4869: 2857: 2513: 2486: 2466: 1699:

FYI... All steps were completed. We have received the permission for the image(s) and OTRS has made the necessary

377: 351: 5701:

has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

5541:

has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

5483:

has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

4936: 4117: 2424: 84: 5720: 5537: 5522: 4641: 4602: 3121: 3055: 2923: 2900: 2880: 2869: 2175: 2024: 1832:

Hopefully you realized you gave him 3 different warnings and reported him to AIV all after his last edit. ;)

1816: 1581: 1033:

I wouldn't really know. It definitely depends on the circumstances, but it might be an idea to bring it up at

613: 518: 4993:, for an option an article about Indian cinema, which might have space for some of the content this one shows. 4717: 2791:) but is now basically a commuter and service suburb (in the Australian sense) of the nearby regional city of 2768:

is the best option? Also, should I be the one to do it? I really feel bad asking bothering you again. Thanks.

2946:

the new consensus should be followed, rather than the AfD decision, without the need for a DRV or a new AfD.

2485:

Otolemur, I seek council & perhaps assistance. As you may have noticed there is a bit of an edit war at

2043: 5646:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 5589:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 5341:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 4419:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done for the following reason: 4160: 3225: 2804: 2773: 2552: 2530: 2201: 2186: 1729: 1712: 1682: 1604: 1589: 729: 382: 355: 159: 126: 4913: 4798: 4319: 3827: 3817:

19:42, 21 November 2008 Hut 8.5 (Talk | contribs) deleted "Property Standard" ‎ (G11: Blatant advertising)

3786: 3406: 5479: 5464: 5257: 5206: 5050: 4841: 4811: 4690: 4207: 3710: 3556: 3520: 2954: 2904: 2570: 2347: 2286: 2219: 2079: 1826: 1747: 1422: 1361: 1277: 1262: 1247: 1099: 1062: 899: 536: 5300: 5045: 2892: 2808: 5748: