139:
something we provide upon completion of discovery. As such, it does indeed exist by definition but may not be widely known for years to come. My intent was to make known that such a document actually does exist by definition just as one would want people to know what a system unit is. I've known about that since 1981, yet to this day most people still don't know. Regarding 3C in conclusion, it is conceivable that I'm putting the cart before the horse. To my way of thinking, it matters not who makes a 3C listing. What's most important is that the world knows what it is in the interest of standards. You'll forgive me please for wanting a little credit :-) I simply thought that
Knowledge was a good place to start since there's no money to be made. Thank you nonetheless. You folks are tough and I thoroughly enjoyed this without regard to final outcome. By the way, I submitted "system unit" to whatis.com many years ago and never heard back from them. It's refreshing to see that you have it in your encyclopedia.
138:
I'm beginning to understand (finally). This is quite a challenge for a sleepness night and I thank you for your assistance. My final challenge is providing published information because there is none. That's because a 3C listing has never been something we sell or promote to customer, but instead
112:
without significant article improvement is not a good thing (especially on the first night the article was created and tagged as such). I recommend you read the PROD wikilink to fully understand it. You have five days to improve your article before it can be deleted per that policy. I will
127:
I trust you understand - nothing personal. Knowledge has standards which its editors try to uphold. Again, I would recommend not removing the PROD, as placed by a different user, until you are fairly sure the article reads the way you think it should.
117:. In your article's present state, it probably would not survive an AfD debate. Please improve the article with reliable citations from websites. Think of the citations as footnotes which would meet a professor's term paper requirements.
66:
explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
162:
114:
70:
47:
50:, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add
109:
63:
158:
25:
18:
144:
140:
95:
28:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done for the following reason:
166:
55:
82:
78:
74:
69:
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
39:
129:
118:
94:
Final thought on the issue of
Neologism, email is to electronic mail as 3C is to ?
86:
85:. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
169:
147:
132:
121:
98:
89:
48:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article
113:
re-establish the PROD otherwise another user could nominate your
46:
basic
Knowledge criteria may be deleted at any time. Please
163:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/3C (technology term)
161:for deletion. You are invited to comment at
8:
62:on the top of the page and leave a note on
7:
14:
153:Article nominated for deletion
1:
42:, articles that do not meet
40:criteria for speedy deletion
157:I've nominated the article
185:
170:23:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
148:08:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
143:08:23, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
133:07:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
122:07:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
99:08:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
90:05:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
24:A tag has been placed on
64:the article's talk page
159:3C (technology term)
115:Article for Deletion
26:3C (technology term)
19:3C (technology term)
17:Speedy deletion of
176:
61:
60:
54:
184:
183:
179:
178:
177:
175:
174:
173:
155:
106:
71:for biographies
58:
52:
51:
36:
22:
12:
11:
5:
182:
180:
154:
151:
136:
135:
105:
102:
30:
21:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
181:
172:
171:
168:
164:
160:
152:
150:
149:
146:
142:
134:
131:
126:
125:
124:
123:
120:
116:
111:
103:
101:
100:
97:
92:
91:
88:
84:
83:for companies
80:
76:
75:for web sites
72:
67:
65:
57:
49:
45:
41:
35:
34:
29:
27:
20:
16:
156:
145:Pcperfecters
141:Pcperfecters
137:
107:
104:PROD removal
96:Pcperfecters
93:
68:
43:
37:
32:
31:
23:
167:Spacepotato
108:Removing a
38:Under the
79:for bands
33:Neologism
130:Ronbo76
119:Ronbo76
87:Ronbo76
56:hangon
81:, or
110:PROD
44:very
165:.
77:,
73:,
59:}}
53:{{
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.