Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Palcrypt

Source 📝

60:
The KiDo organization also misdirected people in a campaign years ago saying that it was the only government recognized organization for martial arts in Korea which was not then or ever true. All organizations have to receive government approval and recoginition to be licensed and so they virtually
28:
I'd like to know the source of that information. Governments aren't usually in the business of naming martial arts teacher's grades. In the past there have only been two Korean martial artists who were declared Living National Treasures and these were both Taek Kyon practitioners and there are none
56:
I guess I'm a little wary of the couching this title in this way as I have been misled in such directions myself. I can remember being told that Master Choi Yong-Sul had received special government designation for his contribution to the arts but after I went to Korea and explored this further it
32:
I'm sure that these aren't your ideas however I'm not sure that they are true and I'd like some source of verification for them if you have one. Perhaps I am wrong, either way I'd like some confirmation.
64:
Anyway, neither here nor there. We all receive our information from somewhere and hand it on through no fault of our own. I just have found the need to investigate things a little further.
53:
Thanks for the feedback concerning the source of the information and your thoughts behind it. I really appreciated that.
25:
This is a title that was given to Suh, In-Hyuk (as well as his brother Seo, In-Sun) by the Korean government.
19:
You still aren't signing your posts to a registered address and so I'm not sure if you'll get this or not.
61:
all are. Kido was approved but it wasn't the only one by a long shot. this was pure 'spin'.
68: 37: 71: 40: 8: 7: 14: 57:turned out not to be the case. 1: 72:01:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC) 41:02:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 87: 78: 86: 85: 81: 80: 79: 77: 76: 75: 51: 12: 11: 5: 84: 82: 50: 49:Re: Kuk Sa Nim 47: 45: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 83: 74: 73: 70: 65: 62: 58: 54: 48: 46: 43: 42: 39: 34: 30: 26: 23: 20: 17: 66: 63: 59: 55: 52: 44: 35: 31: 27: 24: 21: 18: 15: 29:presently. 22:You wrote: 69:Mateo2006 38:Mateo2006 36:thanks,-- 67:best -- 16:Paul,

Index

Mateo2006
02:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Mateo2006
01:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.