457:
about doing your work properly before labeling people vandals and having to apologize after? Regarding the changes I made, I was simply reviewing your work and felt that the minor changes you made were not warranted or did not improve the articles you mentioned. People can judge for themselves. In no case did I revert your changes in order to have "vandalism" placed back in an article or out of spite, I simply came across them by checking your contributions. I didn't realize that only your changes were legitimate and anyone who reverts your changes is mistaken or a vandal. That doesn't seem to be an attitude thats helpful to wikipedia or social towards fellow wikipedia users.
1038:
for creation") == 0) { addlimenu(tabs, 'AFC actions', 'afc'); var afc = document.getElementById('afc').getElementsByTagName('ul'); addlilink(afc, 'javascript:afc("accept", "accept")', 'accept', ''); addlilink(afc, 'javascript:afcmaybe()', 'defer', ''); addlilink(afc, 'javascript:afc("decline", prompt("Reason from: \n exists, source, bio, web, corp, band, dict, cv, blank, adv, neo, lang, joke, not"))', 'decline', ''); addlilink(afc, 'javascript:afc("decline", "reason")', 'decline with reason', ''); } }
1050:.tabmenu ul { display: none; } #afc ul li { border: 1px solid #aaaaaa; border-top: none; text-align: center; background: #F8FCFF; background-color: #F8FCFF; padding: 0.2px; } .tabmenu:hover ul { z-index: 2; display: block; position: relative; top: 2px; border-top: 1px solid #aaaaaa; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; background: #F8FCFF; background-color: #F8FCFF; } .tabmenu:hover ul li {display:block} .tabmenu a { padding: 0pt 0em !important; background: #F8FCFF; background-color: #F8FCFF;} .tabmenu ul a:hover { font-weight: bold; }
1222:
26:
1509:
1302:
1108:
848 hits, most of them I think relevant. Third, you were given a good secondary source, but you still haven't convinced me that you actually looked at anything more than its title. If you had read the source, you would have discovered that many of the papers it cites are in fact about toughness, and that the concept was introduced in 1973, hardly new. β
1466:
1200:
on the user in questions talk page after removing a whole batch of spamlinks that the editor had added to various articles. The user left a reply of sorts later on and today resumed adding external links the users website. I have already removed them but I'm not sure what warning to add to their talk
1092:
provided under 10 hits. This tells me it was a new concept at best, barely touched on in the mathematical world. The paper you cited was providing a new theory, and it was quoting other research papers, who quite possibly didn't mention the concept themselves, but were a basis for the new theory. No,
503:
Hey! I have a question for you! Why in the Hell are you accusing me of sockpuppetry, by suspecting that I'm using User:Fil-Co as my account when in fact it's not mine. I don't even know who hat hell is User:Fil-Co.. You guys, including yourself is accusing me again!!.How dare you accused me.. When in
1078:
which, if you had looked up, you would have discovered to be a survey citing 162 published research papers on the subject of graph toughness. It was not my stub (I had edited the article previously, but only to sort its stub category) and if it were mine I'd like to think I'd have left the subject's
589:
I did not make any changes to that page. I have made only 1 change to any
Knowledge (XXG) page and that was to Jetsgo Airlines. Please note that the IP address you refer to is a university wireless Internet address accessible by any one of the 16,000 people here. So your charge, at least to me, is
580:
I did not make any changes to that page. I have made only 1 change to any
Knowledge (XXG) page and that was to Jetsgo Airlines. Please note that the IP address you refer to is a university wireless Internet address accessible by any one of the 16,000 people here. So your charge, at least to me, is
443:? Sometimes vandal fighters make mistakes, so before you go templating me back and redoing the vandalism I undid, I suggest you pay close attention. As for the user above, that user has been blocked for vandalism, and got in trouble with several administrators. Please check your facts and read up on
1037:
importScript('User:Sceptre/afc.js'); importScript('Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add LI link'); importScript('Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add LI menu'); addOnloadHook(afclinks); function afclinks() { if(document.title.indexOf("Editing
Knowledge (XXG):Articles
456:
Im quite fed up with people giving vandalism warnings without properly checking what they are changing. Apologies don't excuse the fact that you are trying to do edits quickly rather than properly. There is no excuse for poor edits, hasty edits, and holier than thou attitudes when making edits. How
106:
Please do some research next time before marking something as spam. I would appreciate your help in retrieving all the information that was written on that page. If you have access to it, I would appreciate it if you would please place it back in its original form and then contact me with any edits
1107:
would have been a more appropriate choice. Second, examination of the results should have told you that "graph toughness" was too specific a phrase β even the brief snippets shown by Google for your search more often use other permutations of those words. "Tough graph" instead would have given you
609:
So yeah, i was nowhere near history of sculpture (i hadn't even been to the page till i got this message), so yeah, blocking me from Wiki would be kinda pointless (esp considering this is a temp IP anway), so idk what is up. Could someone be hacking my IP? Otherwise, check somewhere else mate.
225:
has been substantially improved. I'm not the original author, but saw it at AfD and thought it might have some merit. A few of us have reworked the article with independent references and removed a bunch of trivia taken from the Club's website. I beleive this now meets WP standards as a subject
97:
I am the creator of the 24-Hour
Knowledge Factory page, one listed as spam and 'akin to a Dilbert Cartoon' by you. I implore you to please check the Social Science Research Network for this global work paradigm and read over some of the many papers that deal with this new framework. Many companies
1102:
It may have told you that it was a new concept, but if so that only means that you badly misinterpreted the search results, and your phrasing in present tense indicates to me that you still don't understand how mistaken your prod was. First, for a technical concept such as this, Google scholar or
147:
no one has posted a problem with the current version of my user page. Keeping this lack of controversy mind, your blanking of someone else's user page can only be seen as mischievous at best, aggressive at worst. Furthermore, no one's ever warned me about civility in the past. Maybe you're
549:
I'm sorry for my incivil behaviour, I wish it never happen.. But someone out there really hates my guts right now and that user:Is pretending to be me?? That unknown person is trying too sabotage me and damage my reputation as a good wiki-contributer.. For the second time who the hell is
290:, I think you ought to read up on our policies concerning blocks, and it seems a little surprising to me that you, a newbie, would presume that JDi "started it" when he, following policy, didn't block an IP, and you decided to become rude to him. Please, I ask you to stop, now.
1535:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
823:
Hello, i noticed ur commentary on the talk page of Trance. I marked-up the bulk of the article and appreciate it isn't orderly...but I was hoping to incite other editors to help craft the article. I utilised the definition as a starting point as many people
1016:
No problem. Can you tell me what script that is? I'd like to use it - I recently had to remove most scripts from my monobooks because they stopped working. I can't even use Lupin's antivandal script anymore, and I have to revert manually.
774:
is the perfect place to have a proper and courteous exchange, and I encourage you to engage in discussion there. You will notice that, because another user restored the images you removed, you will be able to do that now. Thanks,
759:
Thanks for "encouraging" me to participate to the discussion. Now, I encourage you not to delete the images and destroy my work before having a proper and courteous exchange like grownups should, without necessarily calling the
525:
Look I don't know how the hell is User:Fil-Co, alright!!!Some-one out there is trying to frame me and get me into trouble?? And also User:Fil-co is also trying to sabotage me!!! I need your help, Why don't you believe on this??
343:
I noticed that you deleted my last message. This is inadvisable, as a talkpage is a record of your activities here on wikipedia, although they clutter up your talkpage, you should keep all your messages/warnings/disputes ect.
1539:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1423:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1079:
notability and sources a little more clearly stated (as I have now done) but I think you could have taken the courtesy to investigate the sources a little more carefully before leaving such prods. β
514:. Look, I don't have anything against you, and you might have valuable stuff to add to Knowledge (XXG), but block evasion and personal attacks are not the way to go. Please stop evading your block.
1089:
98:
including IBM have adopted and are in the trial stages of testing the efficacy of this paradigm. A link to one of the most recent research grants given to , the creator of this paradigm, is here:
274:
I didn't even see J Di's comments; all I saw was your rude comments to
Ryulong. And, I might like to point out that several regulars (including administartors) telling you you're wrong just
1481:
148:
confusing me with someone else. Once again, I'd respectfully suggest that you focus your efforts on improving articles rather than fussing over an innocuous and little-noticed user page.--
536:
Look, if you say you're sorry and promise to stop using sockpuppets, I'll withdraw the request for checkuser. Checkusers can prove once and for all if someone is a sockpuppet or not.
1201:
page so I thought that I would let you know that the user is active again so that you can help keep an eye on things if you are so inclined. Thanks for your time and happy editing.
1248:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies
Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also
708:
Ah, I see the situation now. In that case, I'll do a 360 on the matter, and clear the autoblock as soon as the MySQL issue gets fixed. Sorry for the confusion there. β
882:
286:
only show your inability to control yourself. Personally, I would consider myself lucky if I were you, that you haven't been blocked for incivility already. As for
1532:
133:, which you've been warned about in the past. If you have constructive criticism or a point to bring up for someone who made a change in good faith, please do. -
1197:
Hello Part Deux. I just thought that I would give you a heads up that a spamlinker that you have warned before has returned. On Mar 20-21 you left this message
1521:
379:), originally created the article with a single entry, with a link to a site belonging to a "Vincent Spano". That's why I put marked the articles as spam.
1169:
613:
247:
444:
1377:
404:, if he comes back tomorrow, and it still only has one person on it, then it's probably spam. Newbies can be pretty slow at creating new articles.
504:
fact it's false..Someone out there is trying to frame me and get me into trouble..I'll be reported your accusations to the head administrator.
226:
which is noticed nationally wihtin South Africa and to some extent internationally in specialty racing circles. I'd appreciate your feedback.
558:
Ramirez72's IP address used for these messages has been blocked, for block evasion. FiLoCo is indefinitely blocked, as a likely sockpuppet.
107:
that you think would make it more appropriate for
Knowledge (XXG). Additionally, I would appreciate an apology for your rudeness. Thank you.
101:
1459:
672:
Please state a specific and actionable npov concern on the talk page of this article (and any other article where you add a npov template).
1448:
1249:
1127:
You prodded this article but didn't say why so I removed the tag. If you still think it should be deleted then please use the AfD. Thanks.
149:
116:
828:
have very impassioned responses to the usage of 'trance' as a legitimate archterm for numerous related phenomena. This is similar to the
653:
617:
771:
1551:
1256:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) or discuss the relevant issues at
1181:
142:
You're quite wrong about my userpage, among other things. Ever since I got rid of the death threats (directed towards me, mind you),
1381:
1273:
945:
I noticed that you recreated your user page. If you want the history undeleted, just leave me a message and I'll take care of it. --
633:
Ah, it appears you are on a public IP; someitmes people get messages meant for others in this case. Apologies for any inconvenience.
594:
Ah, it appears you are on a public IP; someitmes people get messages meant for others in this case. Apologies for any inconvenience.
832:
that
Charles Tart, Hoffman and other authors have taken. I would appreciate your assistance if you wish to help edit the article.
329:
No, your right, I wont stand up for myself anymore, I 'll just let the whole fucking community trample all over me, ok? thanks .
305:
Who in the name of god are you calling a newbie? I have been here scince the project started you (not under the same username).
25:
1444:
389:
422:
Seems like a recurring theme on your discussion page here you attacking innocent users. What vandalism are you talking about?
264:
Who the hell are you? Why the hell are you warning me? Why don't people understand that J Di
Started this, so leave me alone.
1369:
1313:
1291:
1245:
905:
1148:
1131:
186:
115:
Please do not blank my user page. Admin consensus was that my user page is just fine. Go edit an article or something.--
1373:
837:
376:
1525:
1435:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1440:
1393:
1043:
199:
Sure; actually, I had been doing a much bigger fix, but got an edit conflict with you, so I only added a few things.
1350:
1027:
666:
792:
Thanks, although I'm not new to wikipedia I have only been there on AFC for a week or so, I am familiar with the
1309:
1295:
1145:
1128:
913:
1321:
A disambig page with only one entry thats the same title and another seemingly unrelated (and redlinked) entry
934:
1121:
980:
862:
621:
1253:
745:
Thanks for your msg. That was a few months ago, since then I learned that $ (subj) is a bad idea. Cheers. β
355:
1545:
1389:
1177:
511:
Go ahead. In fact, you're evading a block right now, and the administrators have already gotten involved:
362:
102:
http://www.eller.arizona.edu/news/2007/01/09_IBM_honors_MIS_and_Entrepreneurship_professor_Amar_Gupta.aspx
1436:
1385:
804:
649:
458:
423:
126:
1074:
claiming that the subject was original research. The article as you prodded it contained a reference:
988:
950:
1412:
1403:
1257:
1361:
1338:
1206:
1109:
1080:
385:
222:
216:
210:
169:
page up to snuff. I appreciate it! Oh, and a p.s.--be mindful of the name of the country...it's Col
1516:
1500:
1432:
1416:
1489:
1162:
Sorry, I was not aware/misunderstood the rule. I will attempt to find free use images. Thanks.
746:
719:
366:
917:
432:
What the heck? I may have made a mistake, but was it necessary to undo my vandalism reversions:
173:
mbia (though I have seen a very early flag in the Quinta de Bolivar that uses the "u"). Cheers!
130:
1241:
1221:
1215:
1541:
1346:
1173:
1163:
233:
179:
1428:
1420:
1141:
797:
370:
1431:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1424:
1327:
786:
471:
125:
First, there was no such consensus; you've been asked by multiple people to change it, and
1281:
1071:
984:
946:
776:
761:
568:
279:
251:
793:
1326:
While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be
1202:
1094:
1018:
965:
931:
872:
855:
731:
692:
683:
634:
595:
551:
537:
527:
515:
505:
482:
448:
405:
380:
291:
200:
134:
83:
leave me a message below, and I will look into your edit. Thank you for your patience.
1485:
1265:
1233:
901:
715:
710:
1301:
796:
guidelines but I openly admit I may have made a few mistakes in the past. Regards -
1056:
1006:
673:
174:
308:
secondly, and most importantly, YOU ARE NOT AN ADMIN, so dont tell me what to do.
1272:
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to
888:
The latest version still spoke of the album as future. It starts off by saying: "
682:
Ah. Well, I did it in the edit summary; I thoguht that would be enough. Will do.
657:
166:
1277:
1104:
559:
1356:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
897:
129:
says that if that occurs, you ought to. Second, I'd like to remind you of
921:
345:
330:
316:
265:
1465:
1557:
1493:
1452:
1419:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
1397:
1285:
1209:
1185:
1151:
1134:
1112:
1097:
1083:
1060:
1021:
1010:
994:
968:
954:
875:
865:
842:
811:
779:
764:
749:
734:
724:
695:
686:
676:
660:
637:
625:
598:
574:
540:
518:
485:
461:
451:
426:
408:
394:
348:
333:
319:
294:
268:
254:
236:
203:
193:
152:
137:
119:
829:
1473:
817:
691:
You're right. It wasn't as I first thought. Thanks for the heads-up.
309:
1140:
I'm not sure if you can re-prod or not. You might want to ask at
365:, so having such a list is redudant. Additionally, the creator,
90:
Regarding the deletion of the article: 24-Hour Knowledge Factory
1276:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
474:, you might want to include citations or for facts like this:
400:
Well, agreed it may be redundant, but that's not CSD. Anyway,
41:
1472:
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
1464:
1300:
1220:
1520:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
964:
for a deleted history. Long story. Thanks anyway, though.
930:
Thanks. After doing a search, it appears this is correct.
871:
No no no, don't worry about it. You were doing correctly.
59:
please realize that Recent-Page Patrollers occasionally
57:
becoming angry at me for reverting your legitimate edit,
1514:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
1198:
512:
475:
466:
OK, I'm sorry. You're right, I shouldn't have done it.
441:
439:
437:
435:
433:
145:
143:
1333:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
1076:
Toughness in Graphs, Bauer, Broersma & Schmeichel
909:
series." So I guess it probably is not released yet.
881:
1533:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Chuck Currie
1411:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1244:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
858:, I guess I was too fast. My apologies once again
896:is a music compilation that will be released in
1380:can result in deletion without discussion, and
883:Now That's What I Call Music! 25 (U.S. series)
1004:Sorry, the script I'm using was out of date.
248:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Psyopus
8:
900:. The album will be the 25th edition of the
1480:redirect, you might want to participate in
1250:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
445:Knowledge (XXG):Don't template the regulars
1476:. Since you had some involvement with the
1522:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
1345:notice, but please explain why in your
499:Why Are You accusing Me of Sockpuppetry
772:Knowledge (XXG):Possibly unfree images
1274:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
165:Thanks for your help in getting the
481:see it as vandalism. Again, sorry.
477:. Some people (like myself), might
1484:if you have not already done so.
1328:deleted for any of several reasons
1316:because of the following concern:
854:Sorry about the template I put on
14:
1531:The article will be discussed at
1437:review the candidates' statements
605:Nowhere near history of sculpture
402:give him time to work on the list
1507:
890:Now That's What I Call Music! 25
656:and I screwed up the revert. --
24:
20:
648:Thanks for fixing my revert on
150:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back
117:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back
1443:. For the Election committee,
1413:Arbitration Committee election
1404:ArbCom elections are now open!
1398:12:45, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
652:. I'm having some issues with
63:, as Knowledge (XXG) is often
1:
1494:04:32, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
1453:16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1286:21:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
1228:Another editor has added the
696:16:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
687:16:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
677:16:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
667:Congressional Softball League
661:13:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
638:15:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
626:19:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
599:15:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
153:15:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
138:14:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
120:07:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
1558:23:04, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
1070:You recently left a prod on
575:09:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
541:06:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
519:05:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
486:07:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
462:06:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
452:00:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
427:09:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
409:08:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
395:08:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
349:12:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
334:09:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
320:09:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
315:Now, please leave me alone.
295:09:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
269:09:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
255:05:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
237:17:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
204:22:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
194:02:47, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
1439:and submit your choices on
1384:allows discussion to reach
960:Hey thanks. Actually I was
704:Re: User talk:83.67.217.254
284:I loathe you with a passion
77:reverted your edit in error
1573:
1445:MediaWiki message delivery
1254:Knowledge (XXG):Notability
1152:07:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
1135:09:43, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
1113:23:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
1098:18:30, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
1084:03:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
1061:15:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
1022:14:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
1011:14:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
995:20:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
969:17:55, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
955:09:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
935:18:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
876:14:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
866:14:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
843:06:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
361:Note that there's already
1370:proposed deletion process
1310:Matutina (disambiguation)
1296:Matutina (disambiguation)
1210:17:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
812:20:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
780:07:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
765:07:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
750:03:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
735:19:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
725:19:43, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
590:both baseless and false.
581:both baseless and false.
1524:or whether it should be
1460:Redirects for discussion
1240:template to the article
470:. Just FYI, though, per
1482:the redirect discussion
1378:speedy deletion process
1351:the article's talk page
1186:18:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
1166:18:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
981:User talk:69.117.20.128
839:B9 hummingbird hovering
246:Restored and at afd at
1469:
1305:
1225:
1193:Return of a spamlinker
1122:Voegeli Juste-Constant
1093:I did do my research.
363:Category:Swiss artists
1468:
1417:Arbitration Committee
1382:articles for deletion
1314:proposed for deletion
1304:
1224:
1172:comment was added by
650:Meineke Car Care Bowl
644:Meineke Car Care Bowl
616:comment was added by
356:List of Swiss artists
282:). And comments like
1260:. If you remove the
1421:arbitration process
1146:CambridgeBayWeather
1129:CambridgeBayWeather
1044:Mypage/monobook.css
914:Resurgent insurgent
223:Redhouse Yacht Club
217:Redhouse Yacht Club
211:Redhouse Yacht Club
67:, and sometimes we
1470:
1433:arbitration policy
1374:deletion processes
1306:
1226:
1054:That should work.
979:I've responded at
1458:Rivals listed at
1390:Dylanfromthenorth
1292:Proposed deletion
1246:proposed deletion
1189:
1042:and this to your
924:
741:Indefblock of IPs
722:
629:
573:
87:
86:
49:
48:
1564:
1554:
1548:
1511:
1510:
1367:
1366:
1360:
1344:
1343:
1337:
1271:
1270:
1264:
1239:
1238:
1232:
1167:
1052:
1040:
991:
926:
916:
840:
809:
802:
718:
713:
611:
585:Your Accusations
571:
567:
562:
550:User:Fil-Co..??
418:What vandalism??
393:
190:
183:
177:
94:User Part Duex:
28:
21:
16:
15:
1572:
1571:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1552:
1546:
1512:
1508:
1505:
1463:
1441:the voting page
1407:
1364:
1358:
1357:
1341:
1335:
1334:
1299:
1268:
1262:
1261:
1236:
1230:
1229:
1219:
1195:
1168:βThe preceding
1160:
1125:
1072:graph toughness
1068:
1066:Graph toughness
1051:
1048:
1039:
1035:
1002:
989:
977:
943:
910:
886:
850:
838:
821:
805:
798:
790:
757:
743:
711:
706:
670:
646:
612:βThe preceding
607:
587:
569:
560:
501:
420:
383:
359:
341:
327:
303:
262:
244:
221:The article at
214:
188:
181:
175:
163:
113:
111:Behave yourself
92:
50:
12:
11:
5:
1570:
1568:
1506:
1504:
1499:Nomination of
1497:
1462:
1456:
1410:
1406:
1401:
1388:for deletion.
1368:will stop the
1324:
1323:
1298:
1289:
1218:
1213:
1194:
1191:
1159:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1124:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1110:David Eppstein
1081:David Eppstein
1067:
1064:
1049:
1036:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1001:
998:
976:
973:
972:
971:
942:
939:
938:
937:
885:
880:
879:
878:
856:Yankee go home
849:
846:
836:
820:
815:
789:
784:
783:
782:
756:
753:
742:
739:
738:
737:
705:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
669:
664:
645:
642:
641:
640:
606:
603:
602:
601:
586:
583:
578:
577:
555:
554:
552:User:Ramirez72
546:
545:
544:
543:
531:
530:
528:User:Ramirez72
522:
521:
506:User:Ramirez72
500:
497:
495:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
419:
416:
414:
412:
411:
358:
352:
340:
337:
326:
323:
302:
299:
298:
297:
288:JDi started it
278:have a point (
261:
258:
243:
240:
213:
208:
207:
206:
162:
159:
158:
157:
156:
155:
112:
109:
91:
88:
85:
84:
73:If you believe
51:
47:
46:
33:makes mistakes
29:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1569:
1560:
1559:
1555:
1549:
1543:
1537:
1534:
1529:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1518:
1502:
1498:
1496:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1467:
1461:
1457:
1455:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1363:
1354:
1352:
1348:
1340:
1331:
1329:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1315:
1311:
1303:
1297:
1293:
1290:
1288:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1267:
1259:
1258:its talk page
1255:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1235:
1223:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1211:
1208:
1204:
1199:
1192:
1190:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1165:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1133:
1130:
1123:
1120:
1114:
1111:
1106:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1077:
1073:
1065:
1063:
1062:
1059:
1058:
1047:
1045:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1020:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1009:
1008:
1000:AFC rejecting
999:
997:
996:
992:
986:
982:
974:
970:
967:
963:
959:
958:
957:
956:
952:
948:
940:
936:
933:
929:
928:
927:
925:
923:
919:
915:
908:
907:
903:
899:
895:
891:
884:
877:
874:
870:
869:
868:
867:
864:
860:
859:
857:
847:
845:
844:
841:
833:
831:
827:
819:
816:
814:
813:
810:
808:
803:
801:
795:
788:
785:
781:
778:
773:
769:
768:
767:
766:
763:
754:
752:
751:
748:
747:Humus sapiens
740:
736:
733:
729:
728:
727:
726:
723:
721:
717:
714:
703:
697:
694:
690:
689:
688:
685:
681:
680:
679:
678:
675:
668:
665:
663:
662:
659:
655:
651:
643:
639:
636:
632:
631:
630:
627:
623:
619:
618:84.148.208.55
615:
604:
600:
597:
593:
592:
591:
584:
582:
576:
572:
566:
563:
557:
556:
553:
548:
547:
542:
539:
535:
534:
533:
532:
529:
524:
523:
520:
517:
513:
510:
509:
508:
507:
498:
496:
487:
484:
480:
476:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
460:
459:69.140.51.137
455:
454:
453:
450:
446:
442:
440:
438:
436:
434:
431:
430:
429:
428:
425:
424:69.140.51.137
417:
415:
410:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
396:
391:
387:
382:
378:
375:
372:
368:
364:
357:
353:
351:
350:
347:
338:
336:
335:
332:
324:
322:
321:
318:
313:
311:
306:
300:
296:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
272:
271:
270:
267:
259:
257:
256:
253:
249:
241:
239:
238:
235:
230:
227:
224:
219:
218:
212:
209:
205:
202:
198:
197:
196:
195:
192:
191:
185:
184:
178:
172:
168:
160:
154:
151:
146:
144:
141:
140:
139:
136:
132:
128:
124:
123:
122:
121:
118:
110:
108:
104:
103:
99:
95:
89:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
62:
61:make mistakes
58:
56:
52:
44:
43:
38:
34:
30:
27:
23:
22:
18:
17:
1542:power~enwiki
1538:
1530:
1517:Chuck Currie
1515:
1513:
1503:for deletion
1501:Chuck Currie
1477:
1471:
1408:
1376:exist. The
1372:, but other
1355:
1347:edit summary
1332:
1325:
1320:
1308:The article
1307:
1227:
1196:
1174:Mattfranko81
1164:Mattfranko81
1161:
1126:
1075:
1069:
1055:
1053:
1041:
1026:Add this to
1005:
1003:
978:
975:Your message
961:
944:
911:
904:
893:
889:
887:
863:Radio_Orange
853:
852:
851:
834:
825:
822:
806:
799:
791:
758:
744:
709:
707:
671:
647:
608:
588:
579:
564:
502:
494:
478:
467:
421:
413:
401:
373:
360:
342:
328:
314:
307:
304:
287:
283:
275:
263:
260:How dare you
245:
234:Kevin Murray
231:
228:
220:
215:
187:
180:
170:
164:
114:
105:
100:
96:
93:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
54:
53:
40:
36:
32:
1028:monobook.js
760:headmaster.
167:Naty Botero
127:WP:USERPAGE
1429:topic bans
1362:dated prod
1339:dated prod
1105:MathSciNet
985:Mel Etitis
947:PS2pcGAMER
918:2007-04-18
777:Iamunknown
762:Max Thayer
479:mistakenly
252:NawlinWiki
65:vandalized
42:Report one
31:This user
1425:site bans
1386:consensus
1312:has been
1242:Peegs.com
1216:Peegs.com
1203:MarnetteD
1158:Userboxes
1095:Part Deux
1019:Part Deux
966:Part Deux
941:User page
932:Part Deux
898:July 2007
873:Part Deux
794:noability
732:Part Deux
720:go around
693:Part Deux
684:Part Deux
635:Part Deux
596:Part Deux
538:Part Deux
516:Part Deux
483:Part Deux
449:Part Deux
406:Part Deux
381:NeoChaosX
310:*(cough)*
292:Part Deux
201:Part Deux
135:Part Deux
79:, please
37:RC patrol
1486:feminist
1182:contribs
1170:unsigned
730:Thanks.
614:unsigned
377:contribs
232:Kevin --
189:contribs
131:WP:CIVIL
71:a user.
1526:deleted
1142:WP:PROD
1103:better
716:ilotguy
674:Savidan
280:*cough*
242:Psyopus
229:Thanks
176:Hwonder
75:I have
69:miswarn
1478:Rivals
1474:Rivals
1415:. The
1349:or on
1149:(Talk)
1132:(Talk)
1090:Google
894:Now 25
835:Cheers
818:Trance
807:addict
755:Images
658:Billma
654:popups
472:WP:BLP
367:Vspano
161:Thanks
81:calmly
55:Before
1278:BJBot
962:going
920:18:33
848:Sorry
830:tract
826:STILL
800:Telly
770:Max,
561:Proto
468:Sorry
301:Reply
276:might
1490:talk
1449:talk
1394:talk
1282:talk
1266:prod
1252:and
1234:prod
1207:Talk
1178:talk
1057:Will
1007:Will
990:Talk
983:. --
951:talk
906:Now!
902:U.S.
622:talk
390:walk
386:talk
371:talk
354:re:
339:hmmm
325:fine
182:talk
1409:Hi,
1294:of
892:or
787:AFC
346:1B6
331:1B6
317:1B6
266:1B6
250:.
39:. (
35:on
1556:)
1550:,
1528:.
1492:)
1451:)
1427:,
1396:)
1365:}}
1359:{{
1353:.
1342:}}
1336:{{
1330:.
1284:)
1269:}}
1263:{{
1237:}}
1231:{{
1205:|
1184:)
1180:β’
1144:.
1046::
993:)
953:)
861:.
624:)
565:::
447:.
388:,
312:.
45:)
1553:Ξ½
1547:Ο
1544:(
1488:(
1447:(
1392:(
1280:(
1188:.
1176:(
1030::
987:(
949:(
922:Z
912:β
712:P
628:.
620:(
570:βΊ
392:)
384:(
374:Β·
369:(
171:o
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
