User talk:Patriot1010

695: 694: 982: 1012: 1040: 1004: 874:

the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the

885:

Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered

873:

at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in

588:

for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the

809:"I am interested in adding a conservative balance to Knowledge, politics, and assisting in resolving consensus, disputes against those of liberal bias, as well as pursuing liberal sockpuppets, meatpuppets, and countering liberal "senior editor" vandalism, harrassment, and NPOV via WP:GAME," 937:. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featued article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article 1039:. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas 1119:- if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so: 1164:

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

1112:

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in three years or more.

653:

targeting of Knowledge has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to

357: 346: 1002:

Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a

728: 870: 523: 1030: 938: 930: 1168:

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name on the FRS page, you may be receiving this message. If so, make sure your new account name is on the FRS list instead.

1071: 1036: 838: 777: 706: 487: 1076: 966: 889:

Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion.

78: 66: 643: 1081: 839: 782: 538: 488: 804: 537:

welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions

35: 23: 649:

describes the Facebook arrangement as Knowledge's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

1066: 1061: 1045: 942: 906: 812: 772: 767: 751: 671: 616: 555: 811:

is one of several that may be seen as inappropriate POV pushing. You might consider editing this statement for neutrality or joining the ongoing

663: 1007:. The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a " 297:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 254:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 211:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 168:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 125:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 82:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 39:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 1187: 1056: 762: 519: 452: 419: 386: 353: 302: 259: 216: 173: 130: 87: 44: 1191: 642:, in response to Facebook's decision to use Knowledge as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The 1183: 604: 585: 298: 255: 212: 169: 126: 83: 40: 743: 288: 245: 202: 159: 116: 73: 30: 739: 886:

with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."

390: 379: 164: 152: 747: 891:

Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.

735: 718: 207: 195: 250: 238: 121: 109: 1022:"Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned." 875: 612: 992: 1008: 819: 327:

I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas:

1172: 895: 714: 544: 423: 412: 533:

will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Knowledge and in the world.

328: 1144: 926: 467: 434: 401: 368: 312: 293: 281: 269: 226: 183: 140: 97: 54: 1176: 934: 335: 970: 287: