User talk:PaulTanenbaum - Knowledge (XXG)

1762:"homogeneous transformation matrix", homogeneous might refer to the matrix and not to the transformation. But homogeneous etimologically means: of the same (homo) kind (genus), or same gender. Well, do you know the structure of a 4x4 transformation matrix? It is made of vectors of different kinds. One of the row vectors is just . Three of the column vectors are unit vectors (with fourth element zero), the fourth (representing translation) is of course not necessarily a unit vector (and has a 1 rather than a 0 as fourth element). Would you call this structure "homogeneous"? I am sure you will agree that they call that transformation or matrix homogeneous just because the matrix contains 2552:. You mentioned that the lead was confusing and a bit off-topic. I cleaned it up a bit, and tried to make it about more than just the stain. When you get a chance, could you take a look and let me know if there are parts that are still unclear? I'll try to add some to the article over the coming weeks; it could use quite a bit of work. But in the meantime I hope we can hammer out a lead which will be mildly useful to any readers who stumble across it. Thanks for your help!! 1111:. This being so fundamental in set theory I see no reason to repeat this on a page is a totally different field. Admittedly I don't contribute to WP much and clearly know very few rules (e.g. know nothing about policing links, etc.) My understanding is that any changes I did can be easily undone, so if you feel I made a mistake you might want to correct it (no one corrected me for months). Again, my apologies if my previous remark felt insensitive. 176:... most times people reply on the original person's talk page as then the recipient gets a notice at the top of the page that they have a new message. However, if at the top of a talk page someone says they'll reply on their own page unless requested otherwise, then they'll do exactly that. If you need to see a reply in that case, your choices are to request they post the reply to your page, or their page so you can see when they edit it on your 3200: 3003: 3686: 3564: 3408: 3286: 2914: 2839: 2766: 2693: 3825: 3912: 1441:, etc. examples. What we have here is a high level article which should briefly describe the history of the subject (there should be a separate article on that), outline the subfields and mention connections to other fields. It should not mislead the reader and distract him/her with all these examples, notations, etc. If needed there can be a separate article titled 4031:- yes, that is exactly it. Knowledge (XXG) lags behind the cutting edge - that is how this website is designed. Knowledge (XXG) is a venue for summarizing widely accepted, 'boring' settled science. It is not a place to look for or write about the very latest developments. The Knowledge (XXG) community does not consider that to be a problem. 3905: 1633:

Sometimes these changes/differences are useful or acceptable or consistent, other times (such as in the last example), they are inconsistent and terribly misleading. Some just accept standard terminology, but it is evident that some others do not, otherwise terminology would not change throughout the

999:

reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Knowledge (XXG)'s highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On

875:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

60:

As for responding to messages. Most messages left for me on another user page are going to occur within a day or two if they are going to happen at all. So I just keep track of them by looking at my contributions screen. You will know that there is a change that has been made on that page because the

37:

Hey, Trusilver, I have two blatant newbie questions for you. Seems to me I remember on some occasions that immediately upon logging into Knowledge (XXG) I'd get told, "Hey there's stuff on your watchlist that's changed." But lately all I'm told is the standard "You've successfully logged in; do you

23:

I'm very sorry I haven't had a chance to welcome you earlier, I have been incredibly busy lately. We are glad to have your help. Currently, we have really cut down the backlog of articles in need of copyedit. Therefore, a major goal at this moment is to identify new articles that are in need of work.

3991:

I do wonder, though, at what strikes me as a rather over-broad (and for all I know, even unilateral?) decision by some group of editors as to what belongs and what doesn’t belong in the scope of the medicine project. Of course antimicrobial resistance and GmPcides are extremely relevant to medicine.

475:

Thank you. We watch mathematicians share and credit one another, but in school math, we don't do this. And we should. My best problems, I can only indicate who gave them to me, not where they came from. (I think textbook publishers play a negative role here). I said 'mess.' I meant 'model posing as,

56:

That really just spooked me out. I have never seen that before, but I remember someone else telling me about a watchlist reminder showing up. I believe I told them that they were imagining things. I personally am kind of low-tech about it. I use dual monitors and I cut and paste articles that I have

3995:

But as things appear to me now, anyone wishing to learn a sentence or two about the microbiology of ways to kill Gram-positive bacteria must be prevented from learning anything about GmPcides on Knowledge (XXG) because of censorship by those concerned about medical matters. Instead, that seeker for

1641:

was an effort to make clear the rationale and advantages and drawbacks of standard terminology, by comparing it to other possible options. I concluded that standard terminology is not the best possible choice. You may agree or disagree, but this will not appear in the article. It will remain in the

387:

And I might add that removing 3 mules has the exact same effect as introducing 7 trees. Saying that algebraically, (-3 mules) × (- 7 litres/mule) = (+7 trees) × (+3 litres/tree) = +21 litres. Either one of these changes to what organisms are in the Biodome will increase the oxygen level within at

2662:

I am sorry for the delayed reply. It is a long, boring story, mostly involving insomnia. Regarding my apparently satisfactory answer, it was my pleasure. I do not often get to help people these days, so it is great when I can help even a little bit. You are welcome to reply, but I do not need one.

193:

Hi Paul, generally I prefer if people reply to my talk page, as Timothy suggested above, but it is a matter of personal preference - some people prefer to keep the discussion together. Anyway, good luck, let me know if you want any help (although as a relative newcomer myself, I don't have all the

4024:- this would typically be systematic reviews in major journals, medical textbooks, and the like. Single studies or preliminary research papers will not meet this threshold. If these sources are not available, the correct course of action is to leave the information out until those sources appear. 1523:

I'm in the UK. "Fall under a bus" is used instead of "If you die tomorrow" which is what the person saying it actually means. I can't say I've ever heard it used to refer to a person leaving a company to go elsewhere, it has always meant a date with the bloke with the black cape and scythe.. -

298:

Hi, Paul. Thanks for your examples to my question. I liked them, and I think that I can use them with my students. If you have a moment, would you be so kind as to reply to the last question I have posed in this thread below? Thank you. If so, please post your answer at the Math Ref Desk:

3796:

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please

1804:

are by definition 1-D arrays, so a vector in N-D space is not N-D. But when somebody writes or says "3-D vector" to mean "3-element vector", I am not so "disgusted" as when somebody writes "homogeneous transformation matrix" to say "matrix of homogeneous coordinates" or "affine transformation

1761:

Now, a rototranslation (performed by a so-called "homogeneous transformation matrix") is not a linear transformation and does not meet the condition of homogeneity... There's another possible interpretation of the computer graphics terminology. In the intention of those who use the expression

1745:

Thank you for the information you provided. I am aware of the distinction between ball and sphere and the analogous distinction between disk and circle. I can't understand why we need such a distinction for a circle and a sphere and not for a square and cube. I conclude that this is either an

1614:

Thanks for your comment. I understand what is the standard meaning of "partial" in mathematics. I have learned that in the discussion you referred to. But terminology evolves. For instance, in my native (mathematical) language a sphere is a solid object (such as a cube). However, in english a

1629:

Moreover, an extremely large group of people all over the world (mostly in computer graphics) recently decided to call "homogeneous transformation matrix" the 4x4 matrix used to perform affine (non-homogeneous) transformations (e.g. roto-translation) on 3-D space. Unfortunately, this is now

2778:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3773: 2851:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1642:

discussion section. It will make editors aware about the limits of standard terminology, and may convince some editor to add a sentence or two to explain the rationale (this is a difficult task, however, because I believe we proved that the rationale is not totally faultless).

1000:

behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing,

3242:

was the standard one with Wikidata – its refusal to allow anything other than 1:1 links. Some language wikis, like Wikidata itself, have entries at the scientific name(s) and the vernacular name, others have only one. As the French article is at the vernacular name,

417:

Paul Tanenbaum -- Thanks. That is an example that I think will work well to illustrate the concept that negative times negative yields positive. Can you offer any type of similar analogy to the adding/subtracting money from the bank account examples? Thanks.

3029:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1766:. Similarly, calling "Cartesian transformation matrix" a matrix containing Cartesian coordinates would be sloppy terminology. But at least it would not be conflicting with a different definition of the word "Cartesian" in the context of transformations! :-) 2705:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1212:. Why the difference? Why recycle arithmetic notation in the latter case but not in the former? It's something of a pun: the cardinalities in the latter case always behave multiplicatively, and that's even why we call the darned thing a Cartesian 1133:

Apologies accepted, I assure you. Yes, of course, the cardinality of a union is the sum of the cardinalities (provided the sets are disjoint!). I think, though, you missed the point of the paragraph you deleted. After all, we denote the union by

3919:. Thanks for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG). I noticed that you recently made additions to one or more articles without citing a reliable source. Please note that all content and edits on Knowledge (XXG) are expected to be verifiable in 3776: 1749:

As for the use of the word "homogeneous", I agree that in different contexts it means different concepts, but when you use it in the context of transformations, homogeneous always refers to one of the conditions required to be linear (see

1677:, both "dans un espace à trois dimensions, ensemble des points situés à égale distance d'un point pris comme centre" and "solide décrit par la forme précédente". Anyway, most all of us anglophones take liberties and use the word 3996:

current microbiological information (from the most highly respected journals!) must wait patiently until somebody publishes a review article that satisfies those who police Knowledge (XXG)’s articles they consider to be medical.

351:

per day. So if you bring in 4 mules, the resultant increase in daily production of oxygen is (+4 mules) × (-7 litres/mule) = -28 litres, or a net loss of 28 litres/day. But if you remove 6 mules, then the effect on the rate of

963:, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the 3992:

But not all bacteriology, for instance, or microbiology is medical. There are all sorts of agricultural and industrial contexts, let alone basic life sciences, to which resistance to antimicrobials is every bit as relevant.

57:

an interest int onto a notepad in my second monitor. I just jump over and look at them from time to time to see if anything has changes. I'm probably one of the rare people that doesn't check my watchlist all that often.

1826:

Hi, you expressed some interest in working on the duality article. Are you still up to it? I'd like to develop the article to Good Article standard, but I think this is a broad topic so more hands/eyes would be good.

3731: 3609: 3451: 3329: 2957: 2879: 2806: 2733: 1976:

My reading of this is that you're making the specific point that when used conversationally / by laymen / in a domestic context, the terms power and energy are often conflated and are hence regarded as synonymous.

3033:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1665:, when English-language mathematicians are speaking precisely, we universally interpret the word to refer to a two-dimensional surface, while the object corresponding to the sphere's interior is referred to as a 2509:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1634:

centuries. I just hope that those who have the courage and authority to advocate for a change will more frequently succeed when they are "right" than where they are not (indeed, in some cases they are not).

1102:

which corresponds to taking a product. I see no reason to explain this anywhere but on the pages I referred to. Similarly, taking all subsets of a set is a standard operation in set theory explained in

3715:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3593:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3435:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3313:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2941:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2863:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2790:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2717:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1861:

should be hyphenated. The difficulty is that scads of articles link to it. Is there some way to automatically update all linking pages to get them all to link to the new location of a moved article?—

339:

For each tree that you bring into the Biodome research station, the daily production of oxygen in the sealed facility is increased by 3 litres. Bring in 5 trees and the resultant increase in daily O

221:

Suggestion: how about putting the example back in, with an explanation that it is an example not involving a participle? That might make it less likely to be deleted as just a redundant example.

3999:

I have no doubt at all about the good intentions of those involved, and I can see very good reasons for trying to prevent the risk that misguided users might see Knowledge (XXG) articles as

3700: 3578: 3421: 3299: 2927: 263:

Did you have a copy of the book in front of you when you made that alteration? The reason I ask is that Allenby was translating from Cantor's work in German, and since Cantor called a set

3988:

I appreciate your coming to my talk page and informing me of your actions and your reasons. This at least does feel to me to be cooperative in the way that Knowledge (XXG) aspires to.

1980:

But in fact, this is an example of a fairly widespread vernacular use that should not be employed when discussing these concepts in a technical quantitative manner, i.e. they are not

1657:

Very interesting and informative response! First, let me say that we agree on much. It was particularly intriguing to me (an amateur linguist) to hear about the extent to which some

3790: 4094:, but even from July 2024 (admittedly, this latter is not about research and doesn’t involve a primary source, but it certainly does demonstrate currency). And closer to medicine, 1374:

of denoting a set based on an expression for its cardinality—is very much a notion related to enumerative combinatorics. Nor is it as obvious as addition or multiplication why

1758:" seems to be used according to some Knowledge (XXG) editor (I do not agree about redundant terminology: there's not such a thing as a non-homogeneous linear transformation!). 1314: 1355: 3111: 234:

Response to your latest comment on my talk; see my new policy @ top of page. I'm going to try to keep conversations on the one page so they're not split between 2 pages. +

3798: 1210: 1158: 93:

spooky? I just timed out, so when I logged back in, I got a yellow banner that said "You have new messages (last change)," and the new messages was your reply above!.

1746:

incomplete or an useless evolution of mathematical language in English (and notice that English textbooks in mechanical engineering do not endorse this distinction).

1987:

Is my interpretation of your addition correct? I ask because I'm seeing the fact you draw attention to this common misconception as somehow endorsing it as correct.

526:

Well, my apologies for that mistake. I hope that review, short as it is, has satisfied some of your reasons for going for a review. By the way, what's FWIW? Cheers,

1184: 3026: 270:

Anyway, I don't have a copy of Allenby's book handy, so I'm just curious if you altered the direct quote with due diligence, or were just a bit careless. Thanks!

3258:, which makes the manual link you added unnecessary. But it's a matter of choosing the least worst option. (If you're interested in the issues with Wikidata, see 1267: 1247: 936: 17: 1702:, I'm afraid I don't share your view that its use to describe certain transformation matrices (or coordinates) is inconsistent or terribly misleading, because 607: 43:

Along those lines, how do you manage to respond wherever people leave messages for you. In particular, did you just flag my own talk page to watch? Thanks.

3080: 3015: 2586: 2463: 2410: 2647:

I just wanted to let you know that I tried to answer your concerns about the redirect of "protein residue" to "protein structure" on my talk page. Thanks,

3789:

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the

3127: 2453: 38:

wish to return to the ] article?" so I have to manually visit "my watchlist" to see what's new. Am I imagining something? Is there some option to set?

1619:

seems to be defined as a surface (this means that the volume of any sphere is zero; this is confusing; according to my english textbooks, many native

3879: 3213: 2449: 143: 2306: 2294: 2263: 2251: 300: 3836:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to 1445:

or whatever, with links from the main article to there. To give you an idea of what I am thinking about, consider the following short article:

114:

That one's not only completely normal, it always seems to happen to me right when I'm in the middle of something that I can't break away from.

3206: 3199: 2400: 3494: 3076: 2582: 2459: 2406: 2000: 2358: 2353:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2315: 2310:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2272: 2267:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2229: 2224:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2186: 2181:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2143: 2138:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2100: 2095:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 2057: 2052:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 1943: 1938:. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see 3870:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

3754: 3632: 3474: 3351: 2979: 2893: 2820: 2747: 2534: 2396: 3123: 160: 139: 3259: 1076:. Perhaps I am being too sensitive, but I thought you might be interested to know how your reply came across to at least one person.— 1800:

For a similar reason we should not say "3-D vector", but "vector in 3-D space" or "3-element vector". In other words, all vectors in

1593: 1755: 3932: 2354: 2311: 2268: 2225: 2182: 2139: 2096: 2053: 2048: 2036: 1939: 948: 284:

The distinction is that unlike jokebook, in an encyclopedia 1-2 examples are enough to represent a particular subclass of jokes. `'

1693:, but certainly not all. And at least in non-technical contexts, nobody would assert that the term "straight line" was redundant. 603: 842: 2344: 2301: 2258: 2215: 2172: 2129: 2086: 2043: 1929: 1714:

that partitions the integers according to their sets of distinct prime divisors is called homogeneity. For another example, an

3750: 3628: 3470: 3347: 2975: 2889: 2816: 2743: 2530: 1719: 3875: 3841: 3724: 3602: 3444: 3322: 2950: 2872: 2799: 2726: 2456:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2403:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2579:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 440:

Me, I just stopped by to say that the Biodome example was truly inspired. Excellent answer. Tip o' the hat, and all that. —

1623:

engineers would disagree; in these textbooks, you can find formulas for computing volume and moment of inertia of spheres).

1186:. But for the other example you give we do put the arithmetic notation to double duty: we denote the Cartesian product by 2625: 1626:

Also, in my native language a line can be either curved or straight, while in standard english line means straight line.

1566: 534: 186: 3940: 217:

My reason for making the addition was to provide a simple example of dangling modifier that did not involve a participle.

1494: 731: 3885: 3019: 2521:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

969:

to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the

3736: 3614: 3456: 3334: 3224: 2962: 2884: 2811: 2738: 2526: 1108: 983:

The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both

4095: 2571:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2440:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2383:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

458:

Hi, I stumbled on this biodome mess, and would like to share it with (other) teachers. Can I credit it to someone?

267:, I think there's a very good chance that Allenby used the symbols M and m, and not S and s, as you would have it. 4124:, but am merely suggesting that WikiProject Medicine might display a bit of humility about the scope within which 1661:

between English and your native language (presumably l'Italiano?) are far from synonymous. Certainly as concerns

912:

Hi! I'm not sure if you remember me, but a while back I adopted you. I retired in June or July, but now I'm back.

610:

for each page. Since there were only five pages, I did it myself, but if there was more, you could request that a

2004: 1832: 1727: 1476: 977:

subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial

819: 69:

the two impossible to miss blue and red tool buttons disappear as soon as a change has been made to the article.)

3871: 3829: 3833: 1850: 895: 771: 527: 3712: 3590: 3432: 3310: 3066: 2938: 2860: 2787: 2714: 602:

There's no way to "move" a category in the way you're thinking of. The only way to do what you want is change

3267: 3169: 2349: 2337: 2177: 2165: 2091: 2079: 1774: 1763: 1216:. Since cardinalities of unions do not, in general, behave additively, we don't use the plus sign for them. 4101:

includes discussion of the organism’s degrading aromatic compounds that references a January 2024 paper in

3070: 1996: 1482: 1229:

So, when an author is trying to decide, say, what symbol to use for the set of all edges possible on a set

1094:

My apologies. Maybe I didn't explain all this carefully. If you have two sets X and Y you can take their

4146:. Editors don't need to be involved in WikiProject Medicine to apply it; it is part of the community-wide 3650: 3252: 3220: 2549: 1726:

is used, according to context, to mean either of two quite different things. Just look at the article on

847: 824: 419: 304: 235: 225: 3845: 3837: 2522: 1073: 4155: 4050: 3894: 2220: 2208: 1820: 1751: 1638: 1438: 1249:

of vertices, she may well reason thus: "What I want a symbol for is the set of all 2-element subsets of

1020: 855: 793: 751: 741: 559: 552: 173: 3936: 4142:

The scope of MEDRS is not at the "article" level; rather, it applies to any content anywhere which is

3053:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1828: 1711: 1602: 884: 756: 498: 4086:

As an example of Knowledge (XXG) articles that don’t fall under the shadow of WikiProject Medicine,

3694: 3572: 3415: 3293: 2921: 2847: 2774: 2701: 2683: 2498: 2489: 978: 860: 66: 3927:, and in your edit you did not include any references that meet that ideal. Please have a look at 3848:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 1934: 1922: 1889: 1637:

I am perfectly aware that Knowledge (XXG) cannot propose changes in terminology. The discussion on

1578: 923: 3931:

to learn about the quality standards for medical sourcing. You might also want to take a look at

3708: 3586: 3428: 3306: 2934: 2856: 2783: 2710: 2518: 2502: 1272: 988: 984: 974: 970: 965: 960: 726: 4129: 4060: 4007: 3532: 3263: 3039: 2633: 2557: 2020: 1876:

If the article has multiple incoming links, it might be a better idea to first file a request at

1862: 1810: 1791: 1731: 1715: 1647: 1486: 1404: 1095: 1077: 1069: 1053: 1049: 1030: 788: 590: 389: 361: 94: 44: 4121: 4076: 4021: 3971: 3928: 3924: 1323: 142:

and saw that the LoCE copyedit template you added was on the article's page itself, not on its

4087: 4036: 4003:. But I hope that you, too, can see that there is also legitimacy to my point of view as well. 3979: 3956: 3948: 3669: 3547: 3513: 3389: 3184: 3142: 3096: 3062: 2617: 2602: 2479: 2441: 2426: 2368: 2325: 2282: 2239: 2196: 2153: 2110: 2067: 1953: 1560: 1454: 1189: 1116: 1099: 721: 696: 271: 184: 177: 150: 3923:. In articles related to medical topics, the standard for content and sourcing is defined at 3720: 3598: 3440: 3318: 2946: 2868: 2795: 2722: 2514: 2506: 1002: 955: 256:. I'm curious about one thing in particular. You altered a direct quote from a book entitled 4151: 4046: 3890: 3810: 3743: 3621: 3463: 3341: 3165: 2969: 2672: 2652: 2621: 1911: 1490: 1137: 801: 761: 556: 195: 164: 4147: 4143: 4059:

Very few things are 100% feature or bug. Please see my reply to MrOllie immediately below.

3904: 3723:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3716: 3601:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3594: 3443:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3436: 3321:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3314: 2949:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2942: 2871:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2864: 2798:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2791: 2725:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2718: 2517:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2510: 1885: 648:

PS WODUP has responded to you, but since I already typed this out I'll post it anyway. :)--

615: 611: 4106: 3967: 3867: 3804:

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

2343: