488:. I think it's become pretty clear in the intervening time since the user in question filed an abusive, disingenuous, and bullying -- and ultimately completely unsuccessful -- RfA against me that it was his behavior and not mine that was the problem. I have stayed away from disputes with that user at the recommendation of the arbitration committee, but I do think that if there are others who feel his actions have continued to be unwarranted that a conduct RfC may be in order. I don't think it would be appropriate for me to initiate such action, of course. But as I see it, there are three issues at stake here -- (1) a misunderstanding of (or simply a refusal to take seriously) Knowledge (XXG) policy concerning original research, and (2) a faulty assumption that "Communism" or "Communist" has a single objective and agreed upon meaning in all the various contexts in which it is used. As Otolemur points out above, the word is being used in a variety of contexts that are equated willy-nilly by writers who refuse to use language and concepts precisely. It may be POV-pushing, or it may be simply a lack of understanding of the issues. (The same is true of the word "terrorism" in the one article, of course). (3) Again, we can just call this POV-pushing, but there seems to be a specifically polarizing understanding of anything to do with Communism or the former Soviet Union that treats anything negative that can be said about them (no matter how poorly sourced or just plain batty) as a higher truth that would only be opposed by some kind of Red sympathizer. I thought the Red Scare was over but it's alive and well here. Ridiculous conspiracy theories about former Soviets hiding Saddam's nukes, or about Soviet spies planting nukes in the Shenandoah Valley, or about Chinese intelligence agents dressing up as Mexicans so they can take over Texas are treated on some of these pages as eminently credible, not because they have any actual evidence to back them up, but simply because they make "communists" look bad. I don't know what can be done about any of this, but a lot of it does seem to be prohibited specifically by Knowledge (XXG) rules on original research.
587:
mean when they were already in power), but there are quite a few of them (and two major ones at that). So, that would create havoc in the second article too. Basically, I think the first article quoted by
Biophys has a reason to be, but it should be cleared from POV and COATRACK concerns by clearly stating that not "all communisms are equal" (inside joke) and that for some of these groups who may have claimed to be or were claimed communist and terrorist it is a matter of opinion whether they are communist or ever were and that even the terrorsit charge is not always proven (well, it is a major editing point at Knowledge (XXG) that you should be careful when using the word "terrorist" but in this article this rule does not seem to have been adhered to very carefully). The German RAF is a good example: OK, obviously a terror gang, but what about the communism? A writer famously called them children of Hitler (not of Stalin or Lenin) and both the main surviving leader and the main non-terrorist advocate are now active in extreme-right parties. The (first) article will also have to be watched attentively, because the mistakes in the present article indicate that some users are trying to push their own viewpoints on territorial conflicts. The second artticle would indeed be an attempt to proliferate OR and Novel Synthesis and is a POV fork.--
1203:) "I never chose to be in your battle. I never chose certain editors to be my opponents." The birfer charge is silly, it was clearly in reference to the fact that some people who had been "disrupting" the artificial consensus reached off wiki, had indeed been presented with an insinuation that they were perhaps nazi, then after they had explained themselves they were presented with an insinuation that perhaps they were communist, and after further explaining and outing themselves they were told they were Western intellectuals who had no inkling what life was under the Soviet Union and had COI (apart form COI, that was all in the text you are referring to). And yes, if Knowledge (XXG) contributors really feel that kind of line of insinuation is not silly, then well let us call them mailing list members. --
913:
writing something even remotely similar to that on
Knowledge (XXG)) "If this happened on a server in X and the writer A was present in country X, he would have been summoned by the police to give evidence at the nearest station." is a legal threat if the writer of that (remember admins: purely meta logical) sentence lived in X. Just add some baiting so that the admin dealing with it would misunderstand (driving the writer to later say that "of course, having to give evidence at a police station in X, does not mean they suspect you of any crime, but in Great Britain however ..." or "of course you know that one backup server of Knowledge (XXG) is located in a country which borders on X") and the job is done.
986:
somehow doubt. Not taking the animal kind of rat into consideration, there are bad rats and good rats, and it all depends which side you are on. This one was a good rat, as far as I am concerned. To the person I was calling "rat", in case (s)he is lurking in: "Sorry if you object to being called a rat. I am very sorry I called you a rat. I will never call you a rat anymore. If you ever come to
Belgium, please let's meet and I'll buy you any beer you want." For your sake (I am sure the person involved does not really mind now) I will strikeout rat and replace it with "unfaithful one". I was actually more inclined to write "unfaithful member", but even that could be misinterpreted as an insult. --
919:
checked. Second: you are mentioning law a lot in your comments on that page, and most of those comments could only be satisfactorily answered by getting close to the meta logical sentence I wrote above. "And once again, what on-wiki action occurred, or just thought crime again? We are not in Soviet Union anymore, Toto. Do realize already that even private discussions involving murder of Jimbo Wales and replacing him with a sockpuppet on a stick is not actionable unless something actually happened on-wiki." Of course, the
Knowledge (XXG) article that could be linked expressly says
503:
organisations which combine nationalism and communism (interestingly, the
Natioanl Bolshevik party of the RF actually has an electoral pact with Biophys's hero, Kasparov) then we should try to take him at his word: organisations which call or called themselves Marxist, Naxalite, populist should not be in the article. And since the word "communist" was only used before 1917 by the French anarchists and followers of Jules Guesde (who actually condemned terrorism like Lenin), it follows that everything before 1917 must be deleted. Well, he or we could try to include the
1643:). So, this is just the way I play Knowledge (XXG). Like I said, I agree with the removal of the list of law clerks for relevancy. However, the fact that this flap about Velamoor has made the news makes me curious why you are so intent on deleting information about him? This isn't about protecting him, it's about deleting information you don't want the public to see. From your other comments you come across as politically motivated. I don't care where in the world BHO was born, because his mother was a U.S. citizen, therefore he is a naturally born U.S. Citizen.
1016:- and considering that Colchicum is a user I very deeply respect for his ability to keep cool and always remain on a neutral viewpoint - he must have been truly upset to do something stupid like that. I can understand him, though - my only block is for losing self-control after months of bad-faith allegations of being Nazi etc - and doing a somewhat inappropriate comment on my own talk page, after which I was briefly blocked under rather dubious circumstances.
583:
structural coatrack, which in my view should always be sufficient reason to delete, which unfortunately was not the decision now) in both articles, and the second article (communist state terrorism) is obviously OR and a POV fork from state terrorism. Apart from the fact that the coatrack content (stalinist, marxist-leninist, maoist, trotskist and other versions of communism all lumped together) would be far more important in the second one than in the first.
1814:
649:
955:
in the mailing list before I joined, but during the three months I was a member of the mailing list, no one cared enough about
Russavia to "harass" him. Majority of the mailing list was discussions about politics, news articles and such - do go read what Coren posted to the evidence. There was never any "'nnn' article is edited by 'zzz', let's go and edit war!" posts. Perhaps you should re-evaluate your prejudices, really.
1450:
are good people"). Funnily, you are right, the local admin could try to find out my present address at the town hall when checking my birth certificate. It does fall under privacy laws, but civil servants are known to sometimes bend the rules when someone says it is for genealogy or whatever. That means one would have to trust the admin not to do that. I will have to think about that. Thanks for warning me, actually. --
122:, but ultimately was deemed a successful declaration of consensus, and I am now an admin. I definitely paid close attention to everything that was said in the debate, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holidays and all the off-wiki distractions. I'm working my way through the
2082:
2009:
1099:) was deleted by Vecrumba with the words "Dictionary definitions of "rat" consitute harassment, if you have something constructive to say, say it at the case". So, it was all an attempt to bait me into repeating that awful word "rat" - and then claim I had called one of "them" a rat, because baiting me into a legal threat did not succeed. The problem is, I never called Sander a rat. --
126:, carefully double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools, with my main goals being to help out with various backlogs. I sincerely doubt you'll see anything controversial coming from my new access level. :) I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are a few more that I definitely want to get to
515:
machinations of the
Congress party nullified that election victory) the main problem is of ourse the structural WP:COATRACK, the combination of both terrorist insurgency and state terrorism. That is the major problem. I would be in favour of doing away with the state terrorism part as it obviously not sourced, only passingly mentioned in books.
1080:
willing and happy to work with anyone, who is able to provide sources for his views and comments - and isn't clearly ethnically prejudiced (just make it clear, I don't mean that you are ethnically prejudiced, but even during this case and today we have users who are willing to insert anything to defame the object of their hatred). --
756:
romanization is probably preferrable. Oh, and I had a good laugh at "Prolandnom"—it took me a minute to figure out just what the hell it was supposed to mean. Looks like
Guatanamo staff could use somewhat better interpreters, but that would probably improve their overall competence level to unacceptable heights :) Cheers,—
1662:
I finally understand your reference to James von Brunn. Your argument, if I may summarize, "Brunn was a birther. Brunn committed murder with a gun. Therefore birthers are dangerous and likely to murder. Birthers are concerned about
Velamoor working for Carter. Therefore Velamoor is in danger, and
1095:
A wonderful baiting and luring exercise. Anyone who understands
English well and reads this carefully, will understand how clever it is. It is obvious that Sander Säde is trying to lure me into believing he is the whistleblower. The second "confusion" is made after I warned him how his words would be
950:
As I don't remember your last "encounter with the "Estonian" editors" (I don't understand the scare quotes there), I have hard time understanding your references. And I don't routinely check everyone I come across in Knowledge (XXG)... that would be rather paranoid. Like I said before, I really don't
912:
unfaithful one sends the next instalment) and for the benefit of neutral parties lurking in: the way the Russavia block was applied now means that just saying something like (admins take note that this is formulated on a Carnap model meta logical level, no hair on my head would ever dream of actually
1141:
And again, Sander Säde is trying to play the innocent victim. Clearly, I only interpreted "all the best" as a suggestion to continue any possible further discussion on his talk page (the friendly message that Vecrumba deleted as "harassment") How he can possibly defend that he did not try to lure me
1121:
tried you lure into anything, one should be rather paranoid to think something like that. I tried to be friendly, understanding and have a good faith about you... and what do I get? I am "baiting", "luring" - and getting sneaky weird accusations behind my back. Just lovely. Shows what kind of person
168:
And of course, Bonny also made an appearance, but you need to check the history (which will also show the discussion title was renamed). I must say, you (=DC76) had guts not archiving this before his RfA. That would probably have made the history disappear. And before you say, Biruitorul has nothing
1449:
It has been deleted. My offer to the Arbcom still stands however. In the deleted discussion on the decision talk I did mention that I would divulge my home address and real e-mail address only to arbcom (for the reasons you mention, but Martintg thought that was silly "all the Belgians I have known
1300:
I'm going to respond here because the discussion's going off topic of actual Proposed Decisions and we shouldn't make work for the clerks. Anyway - when I said "nobody from the other side" I wasn't thinking of you as being on ... well, any side actually. Your appearance is fairly recent and it post
1019:
I am sorry if I misunderstood your quotes and references. I was (and am) rather annoyed at your comment - I don't "bait" and provoke even my content opponents; getting accused of it by someone I don't even know felt... anything but good. I don't know anything about Martintg's ethnic origin - he has
981:
So, using SS gothics in quoting his screen name (not that you did that, or even approved of it) was not really harassment, it was a joke. But putting that "Paid KGB trolls" picture on my user page to express the LOL I had had when Petri was accused (up to that time I had actually had more conflicts
977:
And now you throw AGF overboard on the quotation marks issue. I have just told you, yes I should have written "Russian" with quotation marks in the case of that American and now you tell me I should not have used quotation marks at "Estonian", because that is scare quote. Or perhaps I got it wrong,
954:
Also, you really seem to be off completely about your assumptions on the mailing list. I hope you are not buying the silly "campaign to harass Russavia" meme he tries to push so desperately, especially now when it is obvious that arbitrators are not fooled by rhetorics? I cannot speak what happened
274:
You did misunderstand the tone of my remark. I was NOT implying that the author of the article was German speaking or did not speak French or English or Russian fluently. I tend to criticize people's edits, not the editors. I am just a fool who is always boasting about his linguistic abilities, and
1652:
What interests me is a federal judge hiring a law clerk from the defendant's counsel while the case is still in play, and then dismissing the case in favor of the defendant. That is highly unusual, and gives the appearance of impropriety - even if it is just coincidence. It happened, it made the
1169:
And I am a victim here - a victim of your bad faith accusations. Like I said, I replied to your posts in a hurry - and you use very convoluted sentence structure which is really hard to understand. So I misunderstood and thought you were displaying good faith - and responded in kind. So sorry that
1041:
Nou breekt mijn klomp! (Dutch, meaning I am flabbergasted and cannot believe what I am seeing in front of my eyes). Since you write "all the best" I have to assume that you want me to continue on your page. I cannot believe that for the second time you are equating yourself with the er, unfaithful
985:
As for "rat", you really need to read my sentence again. I did not compare you to a rat - again you may not realize that someone who reads your sentences even with 100% AGF may now be thinking that you are telling me in a supa sikrit way that you are the one who outed the emails, something which I
586:
Another point: I noticed how fast people were on the draw when I deleted the Kurdistan Workers Party from the article - I think this article and the prospective two are POV magnets. WP:BEANS means I will not say which dictators still governing today were at one time considered Marxists (and yes, I
1023:
And I might take you up on an offer of beer some day - I have not been in Belgium, but I have heard a lot about the amazing beers there. Even my (female) ex-coworker, who despised beer, became a beer-drinker after Java conference in Belgium. And of course, do give me a call if you happen to visit
510:
The bias in the article against non-communists should also be addressed. I mean, this thing has a link to something called "List of communist and socialist terrorist organisations" . Yes, socialist terrorism, when socialism is one the the three main political currents in most of Europe. Surprise,
1079:
Ah. Sorry that I misunderstood you - the reason is mostly that I am having an extraordinarily busy day at work, with barely time for Knowledge (XXG). I thought you might be a person able to put this silly partinsanship behind us - but as you explain, I misunderstood your intentions. I am always
582:
Well, in his own eyes he is doing away with the coatrack, because he splits up the article between communist insurgency, which would be sourced and the communist state terrrorism which is not. But that does not solve most of the problems. There would still be a content coatrack (as opposed to a
294:
Knowledge (XXG), not because of any prejudice. I have nothing against the language or the people. What I meant was "in a foreign language", but there's no such thing as foreign on the Web and I didn't want to sound like a chauvinist. I understand that your remark was not a personal attack; I
1275:
Had I been a member - but that would have meant the mailing list was useless. I never used the word "fucks" so I do not know why you use it here. In the face of a private secret mailing list, where one of the policies was to constantly deny its very existence, it is very difficult to ascertain
918:
You will probably say something about assuming good faith. Sorry, I have some problems there. One: I cannot believe that with what happened at my last encounter with the "Estonian" editors, you did not know I was Belgian or lived in Belgium. And if you did not remember anymore, you should have
502:
Well, I now know why the first people who contested the WP:OWN on that page, ran away. I agree with a lot of things you both say, of course, sometimes on other grounds. If Biophys believes communism is a monolythic entity, and you should not make any distinction between Maoists, Trotskists and
258:
article. In the future, I'd appreciate it if you didn't leave snide remarks in German in the edit summary. The fact that I wrote an article about Kirsanoff does not mean I claim to be fluent in French. For your information, some of the same mistakes are present on the French Knowledge (XXG)
1681:
The main problem with your logic is that Brunn shot up the Holocaust Museum due to his racist ideology. Brunn was also white. You are white. Therefore you may present a danger to Velamoor. Obviously, not all white people share Brunn's views, or his decision to murder. Likewise, many people
1343:
I already know indirectly that I am not in the archive mentioned. Which is normal, since in the last ten months the closest I came to the battleground was an article on Germans in the Caucasus. And no, we never met in direct conflict. We met in indirect conflict over Ghirla, Irpen, Petri and
514:
Apart from the many cynical lies (have a look at the Nepal entry: it says communist terrorism started there in 1994 when the communist party lost the election, when in fact they won that election and their leader took over as Prime Minister, the trouble really started in 1996 after political
755:
would produce nor to the spelling used in Guatanamo records. Choosing Odijev vs. Odizhev is, however, discussable and is up to whatever consensus is reached on the talk page (providing someone bothers to commence a discussion there), but considering the obscurity of this person the default
2094:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1691:
Here is the reason Brunn gave for what he did, "You want my weapons — this is how you'll get them. The Holocaust is a lie. Obama was created by Jews. Obama does what his Jew owners tell him to do. Jews captured America's money. Jews control the mass media. The 1st Amendment is abrogated
1304:
I don't actually know you, nor do I believe we've ever edited anything together so I have no reason to suspect you of anything - nor to have much of an opinion at all. From what I can tell, you had some disagreements with Piotrus way back when and so you decided to comment on the case.
1024:
Estonia, my GMail is easy to get from my name. Although I must admit that I find Estonian beers have become somewhat boring, after all the breweries were forced to adopt EU rules... they all taste okay, but none of them isn't outstanding anymore. Or perhaps my taste has changed.
1142:
into believing that he was the whistleblower or that his account was hacked, is beyond me. After telling me that I am not allowed to use the word "rat" even in connection with the one who brought out the mailing list, Sander Säde compares me to a creationist. Matthew 7,3. --
306:. I am confused by the ambiguity of his birthplace (Riga or Derpt/Dorpat/Yuryev/Tartu). And are you sure he was Jewish? I mean, I'm glad to hear it - my great-grandparents were Lithuanian Jews (they emigrated when it was still Russia) - I'd never heard that about him.
1301:
dates my last suggestion for check user. By "other side" I meant those listed as parties in the case plus a few of the particularly ... vocal ... supporters of their (many of whom have a history of sock puppeting - which I suspect is why they haven't taken up the offer).
606:
the communist ideology). However, as long as certain group was directed and funded by a communist state (like the Soviet Union), it belongs to "communist terrorism" category in my opinion. As about "Communist repressions" article, it could be sourced to many hundreds of
1116:
Sigh. You know. Unfortunately, I don't have ticket out of jail like Giano and I cannot openly say what I think of you after reading this... blurb worthy of leading creationists. I don't understand how can you take a high horse and talk about "baiting and luring". I've
890:
Also, "foolish" would be quite mild way to describe his actions. I don't think I've seen anything as evil even from anon IP vandals - and that is saying quite a bit. And not that it matters, but PasswordUsername/Anti-Nationalist claims to be an American, not Russian.
357:
ik heb een paar dingen aangepast bij die artikel van sikhs in belgie... kijk maar eens en zeg wat ge ervan denkt.. en die nederlands journaal had ik ni al reference genomen want deze site is in het engels en de meeste zouden niks snappen wat er in die journaal staat.
483:
Agree with everything above. Thanks for the note on my page Paul. I wish I had seen the AfD but I don't think it would have made any difference. That article is a disaster. A bunch of unrelated topics strung together to make a point; it is the very definition of
1056:
Um, "All the best" meant... well, "all the best" ie. have a good time in Knowledge (XXG), in your life and other good things. Sorry if I don't treat you like a horrible edit-warring evil list member should, but I don't think I've signed that particular promise ;).
1634:
I'm not inclined toward ideological edit wars. However, I do tend to make sure articles include minority points of view, as well as politically sensitive info that an incumbent's followers consistently try to delete. I've done this for entries on Republicans (
982:
with him than agreements) could never be interpreted as a joke, of course. I have been told that more than 400 mails are about Russavia and more than 50 concern Petri. I would not like to be talked about so much for sure. Not that I ever expect to be, of course.
295:
suspected it was a boast of multilingualism but I didn't want to accuse you of that (as that really would have been ad hominem). As for the capitalization, my thanks was sincere. In the United States, we capitalize all the important words in a title (e.g.,
1020:
mentioned he is from Australia, but considering the number of Estonian expatriates in Australia (escapees from 1940..45), I always thought he was an Estonian or partially Estonian. But, once again, as I am not interested in such matters, I really didn't ask.
1194:
Oh, there we go again. You came to my talk page, remember. You seem now to be claiming that your English is not good enough, but forget what I wrote on your talk page, where I saw you admonishing people to speak English. As for your question why, to quote
887:? How exactly have I "wanted to lure" you into anything, especially into something as stupid as issuing a legal threat? I've re-read my comments and cannot find anything that would be understandable as such even with gross bad-faith misinterpretation.
2021:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
621:
Then you should add the United States as a proliferator of Islamic terrorism, since it funded Afghani Islamists fighting the Soviet Union. Oh, you meant the other way around.... ok, so the Islamists should be listed under "Capitalist terrorism"?
962:
believe in "email list drive"??! And comparison to "rat", how lovely. Nice to see good ol' insults are still appreciated. I think I'd like to at least consider myself above such level and won't respond to your obvious provocation in kind.
686:(sings with loud voice) Khristos voskrese iz mertvich, smertiu smert poprav, i soushchim vo grobyech zhivot darovav! Christus verrezen uit de doden, door Zijn dood overwon Hij de dood, en schenkt terug het leven aan hen in het graf!--
675:
Hi Pasha. Thanks for your greeting. In return please accept this small present. Here is the great piece of one of my favorite Ukrainian painters depicting this event in my homeland as he saw it a little over 100 years ago. Enjoy!
1434:
P.S. I am not sure that publishing your birth certificate is a wise move. As you may noticed cabals actively tried to identified real life identities of certain user ,that is look like, in attempt to harass them in real life.
431:
in the article. "The Soviet collectivization of agriculture was accomplished by terror against those peasants that resisted". This is not related to modern concept of terrorism and clear case of SYNTH. In the article
2122:
2049:
1964:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
1909:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
883:
Thank you for removing the weird defamatory accusation later, but what kind of silliness is "Sander Säde (who wants to lure me into issuing a legal threat against a Russian editor who wrote something foolish)"
415:- in espionage enemy countries are obviously targeted and if KGB is blamed for supporting any organization can be considered terrorist, the same is applied to CIA. Not only this, problem exists in the article
1390:
Matthew 7,3. Before deleting that message of mine, which was obviously a reaction to a discussion on my talk page, as "harassment", you could have come here and seen that it was Sander Säde who started the
154:
How can you not see that all mainstream Romanian editors are opposed to Bonny? Why are you comparing us to extremists? Please, do watch Biruitorul's edits in the next months: convince yourself who he is.
857:
850:
2106:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2033:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1572:
1723:
I pretty much agree with what you said on my talk page and will make appropriate changes if they haven't already been made. The info that he was selected one year before was particularly relevant.
299:), and while I knew the French (European) convention was different, I did not succeed at following it, so I'm glad you did. I was just a little put off by the linguistically exclusive comment.
1549:
I did say "indirectly". I have explained this whole idea already. Oh, and I never said you drove them off the project, I said your approach did. As in "criticize the edits, not the editor." --
536:
Paul, I do not entirely dismiss your opinion. However, if we want to separate the "communist terrorist insurgency" and "communist state terrorism" issues, we will end up with two articles:
1320:
Since you asked some time ago if you were discussed: not to any of my recollections. I don't even recall when and what we have a disagreement "way back when" that Radek's mentions. --
452:
should be removed as revolution is not falls under the criteria of terrorism. By that sense, any independence movement and revolution use violence and will be fall under terrorism,
1411:
Hello. Thanks for the comment. I have now idea why Martintg mentioned him as well. In any case that is not important. In general I tend to ignore provocative comments, for example
1173:
I am not the whistle-blower. I have not ever claimed intentionally in any way that I am. It would be silly to do so, as I joined the list in June and e-mails go back to January.
1122:
I am dealing with. I won't say "all the best" or some other friendly phrase as goodbye, as you undoubtedly twist it into some nefarious meaning again, like you did last time. --
1220:(od) That there was an EEML "artificial consensus" apart from a consensus which would have manifested sans EEML is your personal synthesis based on an assumption of bad faith.
751:
I've moved it back again. Patronymics are only used in titles when there is an ambiguity (clearly none here), and the "Odishev" spelling corresponds neither to what default
1672:
One problem with your logic, is that if Velamoor is in danger, then Carter would be more so. So we should delete the entire entry on Judge Carter to protect him. Ridiculous.
928:
As for the guy really being American, that makes no difference to me. Yes, I should probably use quotation marks more often, but as I wrote elsewhere, you can call me a
920:
1606:
1276:
whether any moderation allegedly urged by Piotrus (mind you: I have not read the archive) was to moderate or to ensure the secret of the mailing list was conserved. --
1176:
Why oh why are you continuing this lunacy? Trying to provoke me into incivility? I am not falling to your trap, so you may just as well give it up. Trying to play a
707:
259:(though that wasn't my source). If I am misinterpreting the tone of your remark, I apologize; perhaps I would have understood it better if you had used English.
1743:
Can provide a source for the claim that Velamoor was chosen a year in advance? I already put it in the article, on your word, but I need to cite the source. Thx.
1609:. I am also answering it here, because I have "compared the members of the East European mailing list to bithers". It took me quite some time to find this back:
440:
is not possible immediately, wait two to three months, then another nomination will be needed. But one thing I will request you now to please join the article
105:
1257:
for Piotrus' role in the midst of editors calling each other "fucks" (yes, that word, specifically) over historical accounts is "mediated" and "brokered."
858:
Talk:Chronology of events of the 2009 Honduran political crisis#SqueakBox unilaterally changed the name again, even as we were discussing the name change
851:
Talk:Chronology of events of the 2009 Honduran political crisis#SqueakBox unilaterally changed the name again, even as we were discussing the name change
385:
378:
74:
1096:
interpreted. However, of course Sander is not the whistleblower and his account was not hacked into. How do we know? Because my post on his talk page (
602:
Paul, you are missing the point. Yes, one could argue that German RAF did not really follow "communist ideology" (although we could argue forever what
1827:
58:
169:
to do with what happened there, come on, you cannot really make us believe that he and you watch each other's talk page very carefully, can you?
1765:
This page will be delete and I know wikipedia is not right. Raphaël is one of the heroes of the world war II. Can you save this page ? Please.
1591:"the old guy at the museum was a birther". I'm completely unfamiliar with what you're referring to, Paul. Though I know what a "birther" is.
1344:
Digwuren. I remember that on the first Ghirla case I claimed that you were dragged into the conflict. In hindsight, I was obviously wrong. --
34:
to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
1488:
Thank you for the feedback. It has been some years now since I have been to your part of the world, but I enjoyed my stays there very much.
923:. And that is all I could comment on that one for now. Just think how nice it would be if I could assume that it is only you I am answering.
206:
2136:
2063:
1989:
1934:
623:
1511:. As has been made abundantly clear, posts that serves no function other than to criticise or denigrate another editor are not permitted.
436:, Soviet government is equated with Chechen terrorists. The main problem Biophys is a blatant POV pusher. Third nomination of the article
78:
1858:
Please, leave my contributions on the talk page (Gerard Depardieu) in peace, so everybody who likes can respond. Don't revert them, ok.
560:
Paul you can see the problem in the response to your comment above, where a user suggests (apparently in all seriousness) remedying the
838:
473:
235:
507:, of course, though that may be ahistorical as well, since between 1902 and 1917 the term "communist" was no longer used in France.
444:. It is extremely POV article. I tried to fix some problems, but it is quite tough to do it alone with Biophys. The entire section
291:
112:
368:
197:, which is particularly appropriate when the individuals in question are not only collaborators, but collaborationist leaders. --
290:
I'm sorry for reacting so hostilely. The reason I mentioned the use of German in a negative way was simply because this is the
2132:
2059:
1985:
1930:
541:
2115:
2042:
1239:
You should check who among the mailing list members claimed that he arranged consensus between Polish and Ukrainian members.--
1180:? Anyone with three working brain cells will see through this. So what is your agenda with these bad-faith misunderstandings?
43:
31:
77:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
123:
466:
141:
1976:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1921:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
63:
2127:
2054:
1981:
1926:
364:
1516:
311:
264:
1370:, in the future, such conversations are best done directly, not through my finding complaints on an admin's page.
130:
status. If you do ever have any concerns about my activities as an administrator, I encourage you to let me know.
573:
493:
456:
also. Some people use the term "terrorism" in this context do not imply it was terrorism. There are questions of
1493:
1416:
1200:
38:
1526:
Please name a single Polish (or not) editor who has cited me as the reason he has retired from this project. --
809:
627:
2103:
2030:
1820:
1813:
70:
202:
1773:
826:
1843:
834:
303:
228:
218:
1977:
1922:
1748:
1728:
1706:
1596:
1512:
307:
260:
239:
90:
612:
565:
549:
53:
1489:
1196:
569:
489:
2090:
2017:
1999:
1953:
1944:
1898:
1889:
1768:
1874:
1798:
1617:
1550:
1451:
1392:
1345:
1277:
1240:
1204:
1184:
1143:
1123:
1100:
1081:
1058:
1043:
1031:
987:
967:
933:
896:
871:
805:
711:
687:
588:
537:
522:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
428:
416:
412:
405:
276:
221:. So I have some questions for you. Can you give me your e-mail? (Really sorry for my poor english)
174:
2099:
2026:
1973:
1957:
1918:
1902:
908:
OK, just in case this is not part of another email list drive (we will just have to wait till the
608:
545:
1379:
1267:
1230:
787:
714:
198:
457:
85:
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
118:
Thank you for your participation in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate that landed on
1836:
1794:
1640:
1533:
1327:
1310:
830:
776:
710:. BTW: Am I now English Knowledge (XXG)'s official German nationalist? Very flattering. :-/
255:
2111:
2038:
1969:
1961:
1914:
1906:
1821:
Talk:Gérard_Depardieu#He_would_need_a_Visa_to_continue_to_live_in_Belgium_next.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F
1790:
1759:
1744:
1724:
1702:
1636:
1592:
1576:
861:
761:
738:
652:
648:
138:
131:
86:
2114:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2107:
2041:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2034:
1972:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1965:
1917:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1910:
752:
568:
problem by proliferating articles that create such problems rather than eliminating them.
485:
461:
119:
1863:
392:
170:
1166:. So, when it comes to blame in comparing things, I would say you should be rather quiet.
732:
What do you mean "has since returned" regarding Digwuren? He appears to still be banned?
561:
232:
222:
127:
1013:
929:
819:
329:
1469:
1440:
1424:
1371:
1258:
1221:
978:
you actually are telling me now that Martintg is an Estonian? Now that would be news.
783:
656:
48:
160:
19:
16:
1529:
1323:
1306:
780:
2081:
2008:
1873:
Sorry, I did notice an edit conflict. Seems I was not cautious enough, though.--
757:
733:
504:
135:
2140:
2067:
1993:
1938:
1882:
1867:
1859:
1848:
1802:
1777:
1752:
1732:
1710:
1625:
1600:
1581:
1558:
1540:
1520:
1497:
1473:
1459:
1444:
1428:
1400:
1384:
1353:
1334:
1314:
1285:
1270:
1248:
1233:
1212:
1189:
1151:
1128:
1108:
1086:
1063:
1051:
1036:
995:
972:
941:
901:
866:
842:
813:
791:
765:
740:
721:
695:
680:
677:
631:
616:
596:
577:
553:
530:
497:
477:
420:
399:
389:
372:
332:
315:
284:
268:
243:
182:
144:
93:
1701:
He was attacking Jews. There is nothing in there about BHO's birth location.
424:
156:
188:
1465:
1436:
1420:
1163:
1012:
The "SS" in Russavia's name was not even used by list member - it was by
386:
Talk:St. Michael's Golden-Domed Monastery#Two things which remain unclear
194:
2118:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2045:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1682:
question where BHO was born, but have nothing else in common with Brunn.
1960:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
1905:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
958:
I miss the point of the first section in your reply completely. Do you
664:
111:
668:
1616:. This was done notwithstanding what the talk page said about it. --
388:.. Sorry for the delay, I just noticed that there's a new section..
254:
Thank you for fixing the capitalization of the French titles in the
1407:
Re:Petri and Martintg: them Poles are not to be blamed for nothing!
411:
It is the systematic bias we are facing in wikipedia. The section
951:
care from where anyone comes from - I do believe only racists do.
166:
2121:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
2048:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1253:
Had you been a member, you would immediately realize that the
1830:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1812:
660:
302:
As for your comments on Kirsanoff, I shall take that to the
110:
1507:
You are hereby given a first and final conduct warning for
1573:
International reaction to the 2009 Honduran military coup
189:
There's a word for "World War II collaborator" in English
661:
Rybinsk Museum-Preserve of History, Architecture and Art
413:
Promotion of terrorist organizations by Communist states
2102:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2029:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1614:
1508:
1412:
1367:
1097:
885:
730:
325:
822:. But that is a few months old so it qualifies???
1653:news, it is noteworthy, it belongs in the article.
708:Knowledge (XXG):Requests_for_arbitration/Piotrus_2
227:Please help me to keep and to improve my article
1952:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1897:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1819:Hello, Paul Pieniezny. You have new messages at
1415:I leave unanswered as they perfectly illustrates
856:Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at
804:Thank you for your tutoring on wiki writing :)
106:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Elonka 3
1663:his name should be deleted from this article."
384:Hi, Paul. I've responded to your questions at
758:Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)
8:
1042:member, the one who divulged the emails. --
69:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1366:Whether you have a simple question or an
542:Political repressions by Communist states
1162:For the record, you have compared us to
647:
540:("communist terrorist insurgency") and
79:Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question
1639:) as well as Christian sect leaders (
2088:Hello, Paul Pieniezny. Voting in the
2015:Hello, Paul Pieniezny. Voting in the
1530:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
1324:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
1296:Check user stuff and the mailing list
351:ik ben ook van belgie en ik ben sikh
275:that is not a snide remark either. --
7:
2091:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
2018:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
779:in connection with the biography of
659:", 1891, Oil on canvas, 133x193 cm,
423:has been included in the article as
2104:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2031:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1178:victim of evil mailing list members
81:, ask me on my talk page, or place
39:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
2075:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
326:His corpse was put on the internet
14:
1978:review the candidates' statements
1923:review the candidates' statements
446:Russian terrorism in 19th century
427:in modern sense. See the section
328:, do you have a source for that?
2080:
2007:
1170:only I was acting on good faith.
150:Your comment at Biruitorul's RfA
124:Knowledge (XXG):New admin school
2125:and submit your choices on the
379:Two things which remain unclear
1984:. For the Election committee,
1954:Arbitration Committee election
1945:ArbCom elections are now open!
1929:. For the Election committee,
1899:Arbitration Committee election
1890:ArbCom elections are now open!
792:04:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
766:16:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
706:Thanks for informing me about
544:("communist state terrorism").
217:I'm the author of the article
1:
2068:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1994:13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1939:13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
814:17:17, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
741:21:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
722:20:56, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
2141:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
1778:12:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
1753:22:45, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
1733:22:28, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
1711:23:16, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
1626:18:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
1601:01:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
1582:16:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
1559:18:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
1541:16:29, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
1521:13:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
1498:20:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
1474:11:33, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1460:11:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1445:11:14, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1429:10:53, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1401:07:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1385:01:44, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1354:20:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
1335:17:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
1315:10:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
1286:23:19, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
1271:21:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
1249:17:15, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
1234:14:40, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
1213:09:59, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1190:08:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1152:07:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1129:06:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
1109:23:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
1087:14:09, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
1064:13:40, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
1052:13:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
1037:11:41, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
996:11:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
973:10:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
942:10:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
902:09:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
775:Thanks for your comments on
771:Richard Wurmbrand in Namibia
655:, "Easter morning prayer in
94:17:47, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
59:How to write a great article
2052:and submit your choices on
1980:and submit your choices on
1925:and submit your choices on
1883:19:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
1868:17:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
1849:00:53, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
1789:Please, look at my comment
511:surprise, the link is dead.
145:19:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
30:Hello, Paul Pieniezny, and
2158:
2133:MediaWiki message delivery
2060:MediaWiki message delivery
2050:the candidates' statements
1986:MediaWiki message delivery
1931:MediaWiki message delivery
1854:My talk page contributions
1803:19:51, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
696:14:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
681:08:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
597:14:21, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
578:21:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
554:15:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
531:07:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
498:17:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
478:13:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
400:03:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
373:16:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
333:19:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
316:07:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
285:09:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
269:07:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
244:19:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
207:21:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
183:10:25, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
161:21:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
134:. Have a good new year, --
1785:Jänisjärvi or Yanisyarvi?
921:"of the US constitution"
867:17:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
843:05:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
1878:
1834:+ Gelukkig nieuwjaar! —
1621:
1554:
1455:
1396:
1349:
1281:
1244:
1208:
1147:
1104:
1047:
991:
937:
691:
632:09:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
592:
526:
354:ik was hier geboren....
280:
178:
1464:No problem. Take care,
617:17:25, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
468:Otolemur crassicaudatus
1817:
1503:Arbcom Conduct warning
932:without any problem.--
672:
429:Internal Soviet terror
365:Sunnybondsinghjalwehra
132:My door is always open
115:
2100:Arbitration Committee
2027:Arbitration Committee
2000:ArbCom Elections 2016
1958:Arbitration Committee
1903:Arbitration Committee
1816:
1027:All the best, Sander
651:
419:also. The concept of
114:
297:The Irony of Destiny
229:Myrzakulov equations
219:Myrzakulov equations
1962:arbitration process
1907:arbitration process
1571:There is an RfC at
1368:accusation to lodge
538:Communist terrorism
454:American Revolution
442:Terrorism in Russia
438:Communist terrorism
434:Terrorism in Russia
417:Terrorism in Russia
406:Communist terrorism
149:
2116:arbitration policy
2043:arbitration policy
2002:: Voting now open!
1974:arbitration policy
1919:arbitration policy
1828:remove this notice
1818:
736:
673:
173:saw it plainly. --
116:
44:How to edit a page
1641:Herbert Armstrong
1376:
1269:
1263:
1232:
1226:
879:Misunderstanding?
875:
846:
829:comment added by
777:Richard Wurmbrand
734:
718:
599:(forgot to sign)
256:Dimitri Kirsanoff
2149:
2084:
2011:
1846:
1839:
1831:
1781:
1637:John L. Brownlee
1579:
1538:
1536:
1419:mentality. Cya,
1382:
1377:
1374:
1332:
1330:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1187:
1126:
1084:
1061:
1034:
970:
899:
869:
864:
845:
823:
818:Recentism? See
719:
716:
653:Mykola Pymonenko
469:
338:Sikhs in BElgium
308:MagnesianPhoenix
261:MagnesianPhoenix
84:
2157:
2156:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2085:
2077:
2072:
2071:
2055:the voting page
2012:
2004:
1982:the voting page
1948:
1927:the voting page
1893:
1856:
1844:
1837:
1832:
1825:
1810:
1787:
1771:
1763:
1607:James von Brunn
1589:
1577:
1569:
1539:
1534:
1528:
1505:
1486:
1409:
1380:
1372:
1364:
1333:
1328:
1322:
1298:
1259:
1222:
1185:
1124:
1082:
1059:
1032:
968:
897:
881:
862:
854:
824:
802:
773:
749:
715:
704:
646:
644:Orthodox Easter
467:
409:
382:
340:
323:
252:
214:
191:
171:User:Mukadderat
152:
109:
82:
64:Manual of Style
12:
11:
5:
2155:
2153:
2123:the candidates
2086:
2079:
2078:
2076:
2073:
2013:
2006:
2005:
2003:
1997:
1951:
1947:
1942:
1896:
1892:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1875:Paul Pieniezny
1855:
1852:
1824:
1811:
1809:
1806:
1786:
1783:
1776:comment added
1769:User:Warinhari
1762:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:henceforth..."
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1629:
1628:
1618:Paul Pieniezny
1611:
1610:
1588:
1585:
1568:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1551:Paul Pieniezny
1544:
1543:
1527:
1504:
1501:
1485:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1452:Paul Pieniezny
1408:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1393:Paul Pieniezny
1363:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1346:Paul Pieniezny
1338:
1337:
1321:
1297:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1278:Paul Pieniezny
1241:Paul Pieniezny
1218:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1205:Paul Pieniezny
1192:
1174:
1171:
1167:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1144:Paul Pieniezny
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1101:Paul Pieniezny
1090:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1044:Paul Pieniezny
1039:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
988:Paul Pieniezny
983:
979:
975:
956:
952:
945:
944:
934:Paul Pieniezny
925:
924:
915:
914:
905:
904:
880:
877:
853:
848:
820:Philip Markoff
806:Brillen Otarie
801:
798:
796:
772:
769:
748:
745:
744:
743:
726:
703:
700:
699:
698:
688:Paul Pieniezny
645:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
624:129.215.37.190
589:Paul Pieniezny
584:
557:
556:
523:Paul Pieniezny
519:
518:
517:
516:
512:
508:
408:
403:
381:
376:
361:dag he salut!
348:comment cava?
345:hoe gaat het?
339:
336:
322:
319:
288:
287:
277:Paul Pieniezny
251:
248:
247:
246:
225:
213:
210:
190:
187:
186:
185:
175:Paul Pieniezny
151:
148:
108:
103:
101:
98:
75:sign your name
67:
66:
61:
56:
51:
46:
41:
23:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2154:
2143:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2129:
2124:
2119:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2096:
2093:
2092:
2083:
2074:
2070:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2051:
2046:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2023:
2020:
2019:
2010:
2001:
1998:
1996:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1891:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1853:
1851:
1850:
1847:
1841:
1840:
1829:
1822:
1815:
1807:
1805:
1804:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1784:
1782:
1779:
1775:
1770:
1766:
1761:
1760:Raphaël Onana
1758:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1741:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1658:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1642:
1638:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1613:
1612:
1608:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1586:
1584:
1583:
1580:
1574:
1566:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1542:
1537:
1531:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1502:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1491:
1483:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1413:such comments
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1391:discussion.--
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1383:
1378:
1369:
1361:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1336:
1331:
1325:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1302:
1295:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1265:
1256:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1231:
1228:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1182:
1181:
1179:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1130:
1127:
1120:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1089:
1088:
1085:
1065:
1062:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1040:
1038:
1035:
1029:
1028:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
997:
993:
989:
984:
980:
976:
974:
971:
965:
964:
961:
957:
953:
949:
948:
947:
946:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
926:
922:
917:
916:
911:
907:
906:
903:
900:
894:
893:
892:
888:
886:
878:
876:
873:
868:
865:
860:. Thank you.
859:
852:
849:
847:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
821:
816:
815:
811:
807:
800:Wiki tutoring
799:
797:
794:
793:
789:
785:
782:
778:
770:
768:
767:
763:
759:
754:
746:
742:
739:
737:
731:
729:
728:
727:
724:
723:
720:
713:
709:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
684:
683:
682:
679:
670:
666:
662:
658:
657:Little Russia
654:
650:
643:
633:
629:
625:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
605:
601:
600:
598:
594:
590:
585:
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
558:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
534:
533:
532:
528:
524:
513:
509:
506:
501:
500:
499:
495:
491:
487:
482:
481:
480:
479:
475:
471:
470:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
407:
404:
402:
401:
398:
397:
396:
391:
387:
380:
377:
375:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
355:
352:
349:
346:
343:
337:
335:
334:
331:
327:
320:
318:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
298:
293:
286:
282:
278:
273:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
257:
249:
245:
241:
237:
234:
230:
226:
224:
220:
216:
215:
211:
209:
208:
204:
200:
199:Paularblaster
196:
184:
180:
176:
172:
167:
165:
164:
163:
162:
158:
147:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
113:
107:
104:
102:
99:
96:
95:
92:
88:
80:
76:
72:
65:
62:
60:
57:
55:
52:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
36:
35:
33:
28:
27:
22:
21:
18:
2126:
2120:
2097:
2089:
2087:
2053:
2047:
2024:
2016:
2014:
1949:
1894:
1857:
1838:Yulia Romero
1835:
1833:
1788:
1767:
1764:
1590:
1570:
1506:
1487:
1417:battleground
1410:
1365:
1303:
1299:
1254:
1219:
1177:
1118:
1092:
1091:
1078:
959:
909:
889:
882:
855:
831:Amthernandez
817:
803:
795:
781:Colin Winter
774:
750:
725:
705:
674:
603:
520:
465:
450:Soviet Union
410:
394:
393:
383:
363:
360:
356:
353:
350:
347:
344:
341:
324:
301:
296:
289:
253:
192:
153:
117:
100:
97:
68:
29:
25:
24:
20:Archive 2007
17:Archive 2006
15:
2128:voting page
1845:Talk to me!
1772:—Preceding
1745:Cadwallader
1725:Cadwallader
1703:Cadwallader
1593:Cadwallader
1255:proper word
1186:Sander Säde
1125:Sander Säde
1083:Sander Säde
1060:Sander Säde
1033:Sander Säde
969:Sander Säde
898:Sander Säde
825:—Preceding
702:Rfa Piotrus
566:WP:COATRACK
505:Bonnot Gang
236:92.46.72.14
2112:topic bans
2039:topic bans
1970:topic bans
1915:topic bans
872:Please see
421:Red terror
342:Hey man !
83:{{helpme}}
71:Wikipedian
49:Help pages
2108:site bans
2035:site bans
1966:site bans
1911:site bans
1509:this diff
1490:Skäpperöd
1197:Skäpperöd
1093:ANALYSIS:
1014:Colchicum
930:Muscovite
870:(Using {{
425:terrorism
330:Sherurcij
304:talk page
212:Thank you
193:and it's
73:! Please
1826:You can
1587:Birthers
1164:birthers
960:honestly
839:contribs
827:unsigned
712:Matthead
607:sources.
458:WP:UNDUE
250:English?
195:quisling
54:Tutorial
26:Welcome!
1774:undated
1513:Manning
1375:ЄСRUМВА
1262:ЄСRUМВА
1225:ЄСRUМВА
747:Odizhev
717:Discuß
665:Rybinsk
609:Biophys
546:Biophys
292:English
32:welcome
1956:. The
1901:. The
1362:Dialog
784:SteveH
753:WP:RUS
735:Avruch
669:Russia
570:csloat
490:csloat
486:WP:SYN
462:WP:SYN
395:/talk/
120:WP:100
87:Ghirla
1860:Cruks
1535:talk
1329:talk
1307:radek
1119:never
678:Irpen
562:WP:OR
390:—dima
128:WP:FA
2137:talk
2098:The
2064:talk
2025:The
1990:talk
1935:talk
1879:talk
1864:talk
1799:talk
1793:. --
1791:here
1749:talk
1729:talk
1707:talk
1622:talk
1597:talk
1578:Rico
1555:talk
1517:talk
1494:talk
1470:talk
1466:M.K.
1456:talk
1441:talk
1437:M.K.
1425:talk
1421:M.K.
1397:talk
1350:talk
1311:talk
1282:talk
1245:talk
1209:talk
1201:talk
1148:talk
1105:talk
1048:talk
992:talk
938:talk
863:Rico
835:talk
810:talk
788:talk
692:talk
628:talk
613:talk
593:talk
574:talk
564:and
550:talk
527:talk
494:talk
474:talk
460:and
448:and
369:talk
312:talk
281:talk
265:talk
240:talk
203:talk
179:talk
157:Dc76
91:talk
1950:Hi,
1895:Hi,
1795:WPK
1575:--
1567:RfC
1305:Ok.
910:rat
874:}})
764:);
762:yo?
760:• (
233:Ngn
223:Ngn
2139:)
2131:.
2110:,
2066:)
2058:.
2037:,
1992:)
1968:,
1937:)
1913:,
1881:)
1866:)
1842:•
1808:TB
1801:)
1751:)
1731:)
1709:)
1624:)
1599:)
1557:)
1519:)
1496:)
1484:Re
1472:)
1458:)
1443:)
1427:)
1399:)
1381:♪
1352:)
1313:)
1284:)
1247:)
1211:)
1183:--
1150:)
1107:)
1057:--
1050:)
1030:--
994:)
966:--
940:)
895:--
841:)
837:•
812:)
790:)
694:)
676:--
667:,
663:,
630:)
615:)
604:is
595:)
576:)
552:)
529:)
521:--
496:)
476:)
464:.
371:)
314:)
283:)
267:)
242:)
231:.
205:)
181:)
159:\
142:ka
139:on
136:El
89:|
2135:(
2062:(
1988:(
1933:(
1877:(
1862:(
1823:.
1797:(
1780:.
1747:(
1727:(
1705:(
1620:(
1595:(
1553:(
1532:|
1515:(
1492:(
1468:(
1454:(
1439:(
1423:(
1395:(
1373:V
1348:(
1326:|
1309:(
1280:(
1260:V
1243:(
1223:V
1207:(
1199:(
1146:(
1103:(
1046:(
990:(
936:(
833:(
808:(
786:(
690:(
671:.
626:(
611:(
591:(
572:(
548:(
525:(
492:(
472:(
367:(
321:?
310:(
279:(
263:(
238:(
201:(
177:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
