Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Paula Pilcher

Source 📝

132:
articles, it would be an unbalanced article if someone placed their thesis or a college term paper about a particular specialized sub-topic in an article such that it made a large section of the article. The fact that some thesis or term paper has references does not mean that everything in it belongs in a general article. Unfortunately, many of us who have some background in science or engineering absolutely cannot accurately judge what is a balanced coverage of some very specialized topic. I studied mechanics of materials many years ago, but the details fade after a time. Our article can be compared to the corresponding article in a work such as Britannica.
260: 197: 515: 100:: he has written a number of loquacious essays, overcharged with references, and he keeps dumping this material almost at random in articles where it does not belong. However, people are so impressed by the scientific apparence that they don't dare to reject these contributions. Just have a look at the clean-up I performed yesterday. -- 68:
A talk page is more than a site for redirecting you to articles your help is needed with. Other editors will inevitably have matters they wish to discuss with you which are not about a particular article, and this is the venue for that. You may delete them from you talk page, and that is taken as an
382:
I see you ran afoul of the three-revert rule—perhaps you aren't familiar with this. It's kind of a blanket rule on Knowledge (XXG). Anyone who reverts a page more than three times in 24 hours gets blocked. Admins try to be impartial about this; it's not uncommon for an admin to block people on both
131:
A few users expect all conversation to be on their own page. More commonly, the conversation goes back and forth. I post on your page, you reply on mine, etc. It seems like there would be too many talk pages on my watchlist if I had to monitor the othe5r editor's page for a reply. As for the glass
431:
Hi, Paula Pilcher, I would like to ask you to reconsider signing out like displayed on you user page. Some of your comments are reasonable, others aren't. I am glad that logger9 you were fighting with was stimulated to re-consider his writing style. We all can grow with co-operation. All the best
383:
sides of the dispute. The block is not a judgement on the merits of your view in this content dispute, but rather on the methods you used. Work with other editors, get consensus. If there is consensus that the material is unwanted, it will be gone quickly.--
69:
indication you have read them. It is a better practice to archive them. I note the deletion of the "Strength of glass" article because of copyright violations. It still seems like an important and notable topic for an article, or a section in the
212:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
44:
tag that is referenced from outside the deleted text, and the deleted text happens to be where its content is defined, that content needs to be copied into the non-deleted reference, otherwise the article will have a citation error. For
471:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 523: 73:
article. Glass seems to be a strong material, but brittle. Various forms of glass are used as structural elements. A new article on the same topic would be a useful addition. Thanks.
158:. I removed the copyvio and am reworking the article. Qw ashould especially do this when the subject is extremely notable, as for him, who was a member of the NAS. 308: 507: 496: 284: 492: 288: 230: 16:
Correspondance preferably on the talk pages of the relevant articles. Use this page only to redirect me there. Thank you. --
296: 276: 214: 209: 114: 96:
article, it not only violated copyright, it was also plain bad. Please see this in the context of the overall activities of
483:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
272: 267: 220: 488: 225:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a 154:
We do not delete for copyvio when there is a noncopyvio version in the history to revert to, as there was for
414: 241: 347: 318: 484: 226: 403: 89: 70: 292: 201: 526:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
460: 451: 407: 388: 373: 365: 234: 54: 480: 464: 519: 437: 343: 314: 176: 118: 101: 17: 441: 531: 93: 476: 468: 333: 302: 280: 205: 137: 78: 479:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 472: 259: 155: 384: 369: 50: 49:, don't worry about it; I've already fixed the problem. Just be careful next time. :-)— 196: 433: 165: 527: 97: 402:
Once your block expires and you return to Knowledge (XXG), could you please go to
329: 133: 74: 46: 39: 32: 535: 500: 445: 421: 392: 377: 351: 337: 322: 248: 184: 169: 141: 126: 82: 58: 25: 160: 42:. Next time, please be careful when deleting text containing <ref: --> 514: 524:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 24#Cold source
467:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
342:
Thanks for pointing that out. I thought I'd put that in. Added now.
175:
Thank you. Good news that we can keep part of the article. --
258: 328:
The block was for 24 hours, in case you were curious.
518:
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
295:. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may 459:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 404:Talk:Glass_Transition#A_note_to_all_contributors 88:The topic definitely deserves a section within 271:from editing for 24 hours in accordance with 8: 204:according to the reverts you have made on 200:You currently appear to be engaged in an 43:tags. If there is a named <ref: --> 7: 229:among editors. If necessary, pursue 406:and respond to my post? Thank you, 14: 485:review the candidates' statements 432:with your projects in life... -- 273:Knowledge (XXG)'s blocking policy 115:Knowledge (XXG):Wikiquette_alerts 513: 195: 522:. The discussion will occur at 307:below, but you should read our 491:. For the Election committee, 461:Arbitration Committee election 452:ArbCom elections are now open! 1: 501:13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 364:I replied to your message on 285:discuss controversial changes 92:. As for the defunct defunct 283:. Please be more careful to 536:18:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC) 487:and submit your choices on 291:rather than engaging in an 38:Hi, thanks for cleaning up 551: 493:MediaWiki message delivery 422:19:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 398:Request for collaboration 393:05:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 378:05:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 352:20:17, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 338:20:14, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 323:20:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 309:guide to appealing blocks 249:19:06, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 185:09:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 170:08:52, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 142:19:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 127:09:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 83:21:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 64:Purpose of your talk page 59:18:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 26:14:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 508:Redirects for discussion 506:"Cold source" listed at 446:20:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 180: 122: 105: 21: 360:Reply to your message. 263: 465:Arbitration Committee 262: 90:Strength of materials 71:Strength of materials 150:speedies for copyvio 469:arbitration process 305:|Your reason here}} 299:by adding the text 217:. If you continue, 481:arbitration policy 289:dispute resolution 275:for violating the 264: 231:dispute resolution 297:contest the block 277:three-revert rule 215:three-revert rule 210:three-revert rule 94:strength of glass 542: 517: 417: 306: 281:Glass transition 244: 208:. Note that the 206:Glass transition 199: 550: 549: 545: 544: 543: 541: 540: 539: 511: 489:the voting page 455: 429: 415: 400: 362: 312: 300: 256: 242: 193: 156:Walter Kauzmann 152: 66: 36: 12: 11: 5: 548: 546: 510: 504: 458: 454: 449: 428: 425: 399: 396: 361: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 265:You have been 257: 255: 252: 192: 189: 188: 187: 151: 148: 147: 146: 145: 144: 113:I put this on 110: 109: 65: 62: 35: 31:Your edits to 29: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 547: 538: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 516: 509: 505: 503: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 453: 450: 448: 447: 443: 439: 435: 426: 424: 423: 420: 418: 411: 410: 405: 397: 395: 394: 390: 386: 380: 379: 375: 371: 367: 366:my talk page. 359: 353: 349: 345: 344:Exploding Boy 341: 340: 339: 335: 331: 327: 326: 325: 324: 320: 316: 315:Exploding Boy 310: 304: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 269: 261: 253: 251: 250: 247: 245: 238: 237: 232: 228: 224: 222: 216: 211: 207: 203: 198: 190: 186: 182: 178: 177:Paula Pilcher 174: 173: 172: 171: 167: 163: 162: 157: 149: 143: 139: 135: 130: 129: 128: 124: 120: 119:Paula Pilcher 116: 112: 111: 107: 103: 102:Paula Pilcher 99: 95: 91: 87: 86: 85: 84: 80: 76: 72: 63: 61: 60: 56: 52: 48: 41: 34: 30: 28: 27: 23: 19: 18:Paula Pilcher 512: 456: 430: 427:Co-operation 412: 408: 401: 381: 363: 313: 266: 239: 235: 223:from editing 218: 194: 159: 153: 98:User:Logger9 67: 37: 15: 520:Cold source 219:you may be 477:topic bans 47:Fiberglass 40:Fiberglass 33:Fiberglass 473:site bans 385:Srleffler 370:Srleffler 254:3RR block 227:consensus 191:June 2009 51:Tetracube 442:WP Glass 434:Afluegel 293:edit war 287:or seek 202:edit war 528:Hildeoc 311:first. 303:unblock 268:blocked 221:blocked 463:. The 330:Edison 134:Edison 75:Edison 532:talk 497:talk 438:talk 416:Talk 389:talk 374:talk 348:talk 334:talk 319:talk 243:Talk 181:talk 166:talk 138:talk 123:talk 106:talk 79:talk 55:talk 22:talk 457:Hi, 279:at 233:. 161:DGG 117:-- 534:) 499:) 475:, 444:) 440:- 409:NW 391:) 376:) 368:-- 350:) 336:) 321:) 301:{{ 236:NW 183:) 168:) 140:) 125:) 81:) 57:) 24:) 530:( 495:( 436:( 419:) 413:( 387:( 372:( 346:( 332:( 317:( 246:) 240:( 179:( 164:( 136:( 121:( 108:) 104:( 77:( 53:( 20:(

Index

Paula Pilcher
talk
14:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Fiberglass
Fiberglass
Fiberglass
Tetracube
talk
18:59, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Strength of materials
Edison
talk
21:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Strength of materials
strength of glass
User:Logger9
Paula Pilcher
talk
Knowledge (XXG):Wikiquette_alerts
Paula Pilcher
talk
09:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Edison
talk
19:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Walter Kauzmann
DGG
talk
08:52, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Paula Pilcher

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.