142:
significant than they are. (For example, do we really need to know the names, occupations, and locations of ordinary people practicing "earning to give"? I condensed those details into general summaries. Do we really need to know the history of discussion on a particular mailing list?) I think anyone would agree that the current version of the earning to give page is far better than the previous one, though even now it requires some cleanup. I agree that some of my nominations for deletion should have been merge requests, cleanup requests, or TNT. But at that the same time it's important to acknowledge that the EA articles are in terrible shape: overly detailed/trivial, disorganized, biased, and promotional.
95:
141:
I've done significant cleanup on some
Knowledge (XXG) articles that were in pretty bad shape. Yes, this involved removing a lot of filler, particularly citations to blog posts. I think many of the editors who work on these articles are too close to the issues, so they find trivial details more
125:
Hi Pawg14, I noticed that you edited out a lot of valuable content from various EA-related articles, and that you also nominated many of these pages for deletion. You are welcome to try to improve the quality of these articles, but many of your edits don't appear to serve that purpose. A more
145:
Again, I appreciate your work on the wild animal suffering page. It looks much better. After removing the low-quality content from articles, it would be good to go back and add some high-quality content, but this is much more
216:. But this question was also about what it was acceptable to do, and for that I'm not sure where to refer you to. You could always go back to the Teahouse and ask again, and maybe this time someone will answer.—
191:
No, I wasn't aware of the voice intro project, thanks. I'll listen to what other editors say about the page, but I think I have a strong case here. The bio was disproportionately long for Galef's notability.
157:
I noticed you're removing lots of material from the bio of Julia Galef. I undid your removal of her voice introduction in the infobox, perhaps you are unaware that there is a Wiki-wide project called the
212:
You didn't get a response, and I'm not sure what to tell you. If it were a technical question, like what procedure to use to put information in a
Knowledge (XXG) article, I would suggest
99:
26:
25:
43:! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge (XXG) and get help from experienced editors like
176:) seem to be conflicting in edits on the page, I suggest you wait for others to engage on the talk page of her article first before continuing. --
126:
constructive approach would be to raise your concerns in the 'talk' page and try to reach a consensus with the other editors. Thanks!
229:
162:
to add recordings of people's voices to
Knowledge (XXG). This was added as part of that project. As for your other edits, you and
103:
173:
159:
73:
223:
57:
40:
167:
107:
50:
131:
111:
181:
217:
213:
163:
127:
121:
Editing out of valuable material and indiscriminate nomination of pages for deletion
177:
98:
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
193:
151:
235:
201:
185:
135:
115:
45:
68:
106:
incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.
89:
Notice of
Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
100:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest/Noticeboard
37:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge (XXG).
8:
17:Pawg14, you are invited to the Teahouse!
7:
14:
93:
24:
1:
55:
251:
236:19:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
202:15:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
186:14:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
136:14:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
116:02:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
79:16:03, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
63:We hope to see you there!
22:
197:
208:Your Teahouse question
102:regarding a possible
104:conflict of interest
160:voice intro project
58:Visit the Teahouse
86:
85:
80:
76:
72:on behalf of the
242:
232:
226:
220:
128:Pablo Stafforini
97:
96:
78:
71:
65:
60:
48:
39:Be our guest at
28:
21:
20:
250:
249:
245:
244:
243:
241:
240:
239:
230:
224:
218:
210:
155:
146:time-consuming.
123:
94:
91:
82:
81:
67:
61:
56:
44:
19:
12:
11:
5:
248:
246:
209:
206:
205:
204:
154:
149:
148:
147:
143:
122:
119:
90:
87:
84:
83:
74:Teahouse hosts
62:
38:
31:
29:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
247:
238:
237:
233:
231:contributions
227:
221:
215:
207:
203:
199:
195:
190:
189:
188:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
153:
150:
144:
140:
139:
138:
137:
133:
129:
120:
118:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
88:
77:
75:
70:
66:Delivered by
59:
54:
52:
47:
42:
36:
30:
27:
23:
16:
211:
170:
156:
124:
92:
64:
41:the Teahouse
34:
32:
219:Vchimpanzee
152:Julia Galef
164:BlackBeast
46:Rosiestep
174:contribs
108:NeatGrey
178:Krelnik
69:HostBot
214:WP:VPT
194:Pawg14
35:Pawg14
225:talk
198:talk
182:talk
168:talk
132:talk
112:talk
51:talk
234:•
53:).
33:Hi
228:•
222:•
200:)
184:)
134:)
114:)
196:(
180:(
171:·
166:(
130:(
110:(
49:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
