User talk:Pbritti - Knowledge (XXG)

2817: 1476: 3507: 1612: 908: 1691: 563: 1068: 2048:

those without the physical book could verify the source. The same edit removed info on the Orthodox church's position which was also not original research, just a self-evident summary of the source, though admittedly a more verified source would have been preferable, so I consider that removal fair, even if not for the reason stated. Did you have some other reason besides original research for removing the section on the WCF, though? Thanks.

3578: 22: 1670: 2732: 2281: 2428: 3557: 3155: 3338: 2638: 2546: 2343: 1213: 1127: 416: 331: 1645: 524: 3540: 2138: 835: 781: 711: 3437: 2510: 3225:, but I can't prove it. I requested a global lock/block from Meta, but per the Stewards suggestion, Elizium23 permanently locked me out of Elizium23's account. Elizium23 is also indeffed on Wiktionary (en). Stewards have hinted that editors could face a global block/ban if the account or editor is blocked/banned on at least 3 different projects. 2933: 3117:

which won you clemency last time. If you maintain this level of subtle incivility over trivial issues, you are likely to land yourself in the same trouble as before. Please do not message me on my talk page again unless to advise me of mandatory notices or for requests to assistance with instances of

2845:

Almighty Father, whose blessed Son before his passion prayed for his disciples that they might be one, even as thou and he are one: Grant that thy Church, being bound together in love and obedience to thee, may be united in one body by the one Spirit, that the world may believe in him whom thou didst

2103:

Editors are expected to refrain from making unnecessary references to the actual or perceived racial, religious, or ethnic background of fellow editors. Such references should be made only if they clearly serve a legitimate purpose. In the context of a noticeboard discussion or dispute resolution, it

2047:

for the purpose of removing original research, although it was quoting a published secondary source (The Creeds of the Evangelical Protestant Churches by Philip Schaff, originally published 1877). It was linked to the digital version on the Bible Hub site rather than a regular book reference so that

913:

I just wanted to stop by with some pie, and to say that altho the Piñon AfD didn't go in the direction you thought it should, I'd like you to know that I appreciate how thoughtful and civil you were throughout the discussion. I respect your work here on WP, and am grateful for the manner in which you

3032:

You're being intentionally confrontational. I'm not going to bite, not over a see also link. I'm not sure why, and I'd love to hear exactly why you think a <10 view-a-day article is among the best candidates for that see also. Your attitude of "why not?" is exactly what the MOS for this trying to

291:

On its face, the book looks reliable. However, the book's author is a creative writer with little to no peer-reviewed history writing. The book itself is not peer-reviewed and was published by a non-academic printing house. The article on the Tower of London is an FA and the one on Westminster Abbey

3620:

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or

3010:

It seems like it could reasonably be included and more information on the subject can be found there. I don't see anything about core elements in the guidelines for inclusion in see alsos. There were only eight things in the section, so it isn't like that had to be removed for anything else to stay

957:

The research was enjoyable and interesting to do. I understood your rationales during the discussion even though we agreed to disagree. In the next day or two I'll look back over the AfD to see if there are others to consult before moving the article. BTW, I was hoping to send a you peach pie since

725:

By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this special, very exclusive award created just for we few, we happy few, this band of brothers, who have shed sweat, tears and probably blood, in order to be able to proudly claim "I too have taken an article to

1499:

Thank you today for the article, introduced: "This article covers a disproportionately influential religious pamphlet written by an otherwise minor figure in 18th-century English Protestant history. The pamphlet would prove the primary influence (besides the 1662 Book of Common Prayer) on American

248:

Your contribution read as a question about the denomination's stance. While your comments here on my talk page clarify that you meant to suggest Knowledge (XXG) should mention those stances, you didn't indicate that. Often, people post comments wholly unrelated to improving articles to talk pages

1733:

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

2172:

Thanks! It has been weird. Definitely the most charged experience I've ever encountered on the project. Clovermoss has demonstrated that their somewhat recent accession to adminship was well deserved and, once all is said and done there, I hope to pay them back for their commitment to improving

671: 979:

I am quite a fan of my homestate's produce! If you want, you can open a move discussion on the talk page, as there's no rush. I'll gladly offer my support to whatever your desired next step is. If you ever need any help with Summit County, Denver, or Sangre de Cristo content, I have a lot of

2173:

editor relationships and maintaining factual accuracy. As an aside, something came across my desk, so to speak, regarding possible disruption on articles related to Catholic BLPs. I may drop a line on your talk to ask for your input on whether intervention is necessary should it continue. ~

2236:

I no longer have access to the private forums of Wikipediocracy, but I strongly advise you not to engage with them as they have become increasingly vitriolic over the past year. Has your personal information been leaked? Is there anything about you in the private forums that I can't see?

683:

This award is given in recognition to Pbritti for accumulating at least 10 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog!

3083:

It doesn't thats part of the error being corrected, there was nothing which suggested that you intended to remove the link either on this talk page or in the edit summary which reads "Accepting invitation on my talk page to add superior see alsos. These two are more generalist."

2022:

thanks for bringing in this other discussion. Better for everyone to have a wider grasp of what's being discussed. I (most probably) won't comment, but your diligence in notifying the relevant parties is really appreciated. Let me know if I can help the discussion in any way. ~

1734:

Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

1030:

I'll try to fix it up a bit. Unfortunately, I fear me cleaning it may have to wait until around October, as I've somewhat scheduled through then. If you need access to certain sources, I possess a few that may be relevant and would love to share them as needed. ~

1918:

I wrote "seeking to lump together the arsons of a group of churches to particular prior events on the basis of speculation only". Clearly there is no denial of any arsons. I specifically refer to them as arsons. Are you going to withdraw your aspersion casting?

2070:

You're correct about the Westminster Confession portion; I must've failed to see to prefatory statements about alterations. I'll reinsert that content. Thanks for the heads up, and my apologies for initially misreading the source and removing that content. ~

232:

What's the difference between one talk page section on missing material, and my own? Usually I sprinkle "The Article would be improved if..." throughout my suggestion but this time I assumed it went without saying. (Article on SBC "Talk" page that you just

3284:

article earlier this week. I do think there should be some mention of this "importance" aspect of baptism in the article. It is not a "personal perspective": it reflects the thought of Pope Paul VI as quoted, and Pope John Paul II made a similar point (see

3621:

more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

3373: 1308:

I am sorry if this was the wrong place: in further instances, I will make sure to discuss such matters in the talk-page of the article itself. Thank you for your re-consideration: I will re-add the edit. Again, thanks, and have a nice day!

2996:, listed in the see also, averages over 300 views a day. Not keen on this distrust of other editors and their judgement you've demonstrated here by posting your above comment. Please do review the guidelines for inclusion in see alsos. ~ 794: 2991:

Allow me to elaborate, as you seem a bit confused: an article with <10 views a day is almost certainly not among the most relevant for inclusion in the see also section of the main article of an incredibly broad subject. For example,

1941:

TarnishedPath, you engaged in a bad-faith AfD. Much to your credit (indeed, the mark of a very good editor), you very quickly withdrew it upon being challenged on that decision. In the spirit of reconciliation, I retract my statement. ~

3068:

Any reason for the misleading edit summary that failed to mention the reinsertion of the contested link? Particularly odd when that article's subject is subordinate to at least two of the superior, more generalist articles I added. ~

1228: 3106: 1267:

page? I noticed that SCOOCH was referred to as the “standing conference” of the OO Communion (while it is merely a regional conference), and that almost the same list of churches are repeated again: hence the edit. Thank you.

431: 2109: 2092: 3462: 2884:, so please forward me any requests or suggestions regarding the city you may have! I'd love to collaborate with you on something soon, so any ideas for an article we could build up together would be appreciated. Best, ~ 3389: 2699: 2607: 2398: 1182: 615: 386: 3565: 1500:

Anglican liturgies and served as a catalyst for the Unitarian prayer book tradition. However, its influence on the institution it was explicitly written for–the Church of England–was almost null."! --

3172:

The Knowledge (XXG) users of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming are invited to an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 13, 2024, at

3226: 234: 3586: 1990: 370: 1294:. Upon review of that edit, I think my reversion could probably be undone. Your explanation here is clear and I now agree with your decision to remove that content. Thanks for your politeness! ~ 3500:

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

3515: 3429: 1620: 2112:, there was a rough consensus that this principle remains true with current policies and guidelines and that there is not an exemption from this principle for asserting that an editor has a 269:

Hi, I see you have deleted a couple of references to a new book about the above lady. Not sure why. The book appears to be a reputable publication and is freely available on Amazon. Regards

1678: 1653: 3548: 3474: 2214: 2210: 1446: 582: 3118:

vandalism or unverified statements (that kind of assistance will always be received upon request). I hope to see your standard substantive contributions in my watchlist again soon.

1970: 1602:

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

249:

about religious groups to ask about their beliefs. I encourage you to do some research on the subject of SBC stances towards Judaism and to return to the article or talk page. ~

3191: 1699: 1540:

A rare treat indeed! I'm assembling material related to organs in one of my areas of focus (Williamsburg, Virginia), so this serves as a good primer on some of the lexicon! ~

2906:

it would be very much appreciated. I am not sure whether it's up to GA standard. Certainly can write a bit more about the architecture, but GA isn't FA, you know. Cheers, --

2254:

I'll communicate about this over private messaging if it comes up further. I've received private advice on best approaches to the issue and wish to adhere to that advice. ~

3392:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2702:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2610:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2401:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1185:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

389:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1442: 1078:, which also happens to be an article I am working on. Sts Fisher & More are included in the prayers today. So do pray for your anglo-kins; we pray for you! Cheers, -- 2779: 1263:

Hello there. I had seen your welcome message: thank you! Hope this is the right place to ask this, but may I kindly ask what was the reason for reverting the edit on the

200: 153: 3366: 3357: 3230: 2683: 2591: 2382: 939:

I am a tad upset, as you beat me to the punch! I had wanted to award you a mark for your incredible research. The admin who formalized my withdrawal moved the page from

238: 3047:

That isn't my attitude, if you think there are better candidates then add them... When size becomes an issue then we can talk about removing Catholic peace tradition.

2096: 3597:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen

799: 3181: 1166: 537: 2902:: thank you very much for your kind offer. I am in a rather important period of the year and work will be overwhelming–but if you would like to double check 1332: 1863:

shameful. Denialism of arson targeting Indigenous people and their places of worship—even if due to truly righteous rage—has no place on Knowledge (XXG). ~

1074:

I wish you a good feast of St Alban, St John Fisher, and St Thomas More. Ascensiontide is long past, but I took a beautiful picture of the painted tiles at

914:

communicate. Would you mind if I went ahead and moved it to Piñon, Colorado? I don't want to step on anyones toes! With best regards from a fellow editor,

597: 3011:

there. I would also note that Anti-Catholicism appears to have been there in error as the concept appears in the article, I have now rectified that error.

2969:

I wanted to take a moment to check that you don't actually think that see also sections are for "core element of this topic" because that would be absurd.

943:

as a standard bureaucratic move—I'm fully on board with you moving it back! I'm glad a subject-matter expert like you lent your eye to the process! ~

3598: 3345: 2645: 2553: 1711: 2816: 2846:

send, the same thy Son Jesus Christ our Lord; who liveth and reigneth with thee, in the unity of the same Spirit, one God, now and for ever. Amen.

1491: 2350: 1134: 622: 570: 3609:

credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to

2676: 2657: 2584: 1722:

credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to

1518:, watch and listen, - I like today's especially because you see him at work, hear him talk about his work and the result of his work - rare! -- 338: 3690: 3486: 3204: 1991:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Noleander

1803: 3681: 3162: 2492: 1993:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the

1794: 2746:

Your noteworthy contribution (3.5 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 160 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation.

1989:

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at

3622: 1735: 625:. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! 2055: 2113: 1374:

I don't think any of these articles are less than a old, expanded at least five-fold during the last week, or recently promoted as

3661: 3647: 1774: 1760: 1245: 448: 2513:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1441:

for 3 August 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at

608: 3686: 3482: 3200: 3154: 1799: 1291: 1657: 3254:

Actually, considering your block here on EnWiki, please engage with me on the Commons. I'd rather not violate sock rules. ~

1994: 1576:, and the image one. The cantata is an extraordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in 3675: 3473:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

2835: 2761: 2294: 2144: 1788: 1430: 855: 788: 772: 3423: 3289:). Weigel's article was moved from "Further reading" (where its relevance was not explained) to the body of the article. 1454: 589: 116: 111: 106: 99: 94: 89: 3629: 3610: 1742: 1723: 1045:

It would be nice if you could share your sources, for both personal interest and the purpose of cleaning up this page.

3089: 3052: 3016: 2974: 2903: 2529: 2005: 1580:. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. -- 1075: 1008:. It was translated from the French article, so there may be some grammatical errors; which, I am trying to clean up. 292:

is a GA, so there is a higher standard for sourcing required. If you need further explanation, feel welcome to ask! ~

82: 77: 72: 65: 60: 55: 48: 43: 38: 2839:

today's TFA! Your effort of working across the aisle and your spirit of constructive inquiry is greatly appreciated.

2496: 2485: 363: 350: 3625:. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October. 3551:) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews; 1453:, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist 3393: 3379: 2703: 2689: 2611: 2597: 2470: 2402: 2388: 1336: 1290:

First off, welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Thanks for commenting here; the other appropriate place would have been the

1264: 1186: 1172: 390: 376: 3454:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

2481: 1104:

Lovely tiling! Let me know if you need any help on the article. Happy feast of my patron, St. John the Baptist! ~

574: 3093: 3056: 3020: 2915: 2859: 2446: 1573: 1555: 1515: 1314: 1273: 1087: 689: 502:

I'm aware of it and have actually been on there before! I may have to actually join it. Thanks for the invite. ~

3633: 2942: 1746: 128: 2951: 3614: 1727: 3561: 3376:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2686:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2594:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2385:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 2242: 2192: 2152: 2095:, in which you may have been involved, has been closed and archived. The request was related to that case's 1818: 1169:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 547: 373:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 358: 2978: 2051: 1714:. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 850: 792:, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Knowledge (XXG). The 3601:. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 3100: 3085: 3063: 3048: 3027: 3012: 2986: 2970: 2525: 2520: 2120: 2059: 2017: 2001: 1585: 1563: 1523: 1505: 1487: 1462: 1310: 1285: 1269: 807: 731: 311: 274: 3680:

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from

1793:

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from

3350: 3294: 2650: 2558: 2466: 2355: 1577: 1483: 1139: 1050: 1013: 343: 2104:

will rarely serve a valid purpose to seek to classify the participants in the discussion on this basis.

2009: 3180:

is encouraged to attend. There is no obligation to participate and all guests are welcome. Please see

2662:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2570:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1475: 1151:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 355:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 3655: 3641: 3582: 2907: 2875: 2851: 2222: 1768: 1754: 1241: 1199: 1099: 1079: 963: 919: 685: 578: 535:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at

444: 3114: 798:

has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may

604: 467: 3405: 2947: 2436:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

1352: 670: 483: 3110: 907: 3511: 3177: 2714: 2622: 2413: 2238: 2188: 2167: 2148: 1921: 1879: 1854: 1831: 1616: 1344: 1340: 1160: 543: 134: 2504: 940: 585:, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments. 1408:

No problem. Thanks for the interest—will look into if those articles can get some overhauls. ~

3669: 3240:

Given what evidence I can see, I'm going to assume you are Elizium. What can I do for you? ~

3188:

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our

2757: 2376: 2117: 1782: 1703: 1581: 1559: 1535: 1519: 1501: 1458: 1449:. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by 1403: 1393: 1369: 1356: 803: 746: 727: 562: 532: 307: 286: 270: 541:

and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

3306: 3290: 3176:. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Knowledge (XXG) and the 2993: 2516: 1877:

Please show me exactly where I engaged in "denialism of arson targeting Indigenous people".

1690: 1628: 1457:

from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work!

1046: 1025: 1009: 886: 865: 815: 130: 21: 3606: 3602: 3531: 2783: 2217:

but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —

1826: 1822: 1719: 1715: 1636: 1438: 1067: 3651: 3637: 3127: 3078: 3042: 3005: 2666: 2574: 2565: 2371: 2362: 2218: 2032: 1764: 1750: 1674: 1649: 1237: 1195: 974: 959: 958:

the very best peaches in the world are from Colorado, but it isn't quite that season yet.

934: 915: 440: 402: 3628:

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see

3527: 3523: 3519: 2500: 1741:

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see

1632: 1624: 1375: 802:

to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers,

3544: 3401: 3222: 2793: 1348: 497: 473: 210: 163: 2320:

Thank you! I'll be around if you need a second pair of eyes to glance at something. ~

3590: 3457:

Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.

2711: 2619: 2410: 643: 629: 306:

Thanks for the reply, I just wondered as, on the face of it, the reference seemed OK

2731: 1445:, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at 1004:

Hello, this seems to be up your alley and is in desperate need of more information.

3665: 3569: 3374:

Template:Did you know nominations/8th National Eucharistic Congress (United States)

3316: 3312: 3255: 3241: 3119: 3070: 3034: 2997: 2937: 2899: 2885: 2747: 2671: 2579: 2456: 2321: 2280: 2255: 2174: 2072: 2024: 1943: 1905: 1864: 1778: 1541: 1409: 1379: 1295: 1249: 1155: 1146: 1105: 1032: 981: 944: 756: 647: 528: 503: 452: 293: 250: 186: 3451:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.

3286: 2474: 3337: 3311:

If you'd like to elaborate a bit on this, please consider starting a section at

2637: 2545: 2342: 2297:.... this is the type of effort we need to solve the majority of problems here. 1695: 1669: 1212: 1126: 881: 860: 811: 415: 330: 3448:

On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.

3577: 3383: 2693: 2601: 2392: 1450: 1176: 523: 398: 380: 2881: 2787: 2315: 2299: 2213:; it runs until the end of July. You are receiving this message because you 1974: 204: 180: 157: 2209:

Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the

780: 3436: 3315:. I'm rather busy off-wiki, so I do apologize for the belated response. ~ 2946:

for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG). Your hard work is appreciated.

2137: 1661: 2932: 1514:

Today I have two "musicians" on the Main page, one is also the topic of

132: 3506: 3281: 3173: 2824: 1682: 1611: 834: 710: 361:, under the name "David's Father", secretly authorized the purchase of 1227:

Your hook reached 14,578 views (607.4 per hour), making it one of the

621:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at

614:

If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the

430:

Your hook reached 14,720 views (613.4 per hour), making it one of the

3568:) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on 3556: 3539: 1644: 1558:, like 22 July but with interview and the music to be played today -- 1437:

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as

3694: 3490: 3409: 3324: 3298: 3263: 3249: 3234: 3208: 2955: 2919: 2893: 2863: 2802: 2766: 2717: 2625: 2533: 2416: 2329: 2304: 2263: 2246: 2226: 2196: 2182: 2156: 2123: 2080: 2063: 1979: 1951: 1936: 1913: 1894: 1872: 1846: 1807: 1589: 1567: 1549: 1527: 1509: 1466: 1417: 1396: 1387: 1359: 1318: 1303: 1277: 1253: 1203: 1113: 1091: 1054: 1040: 1017: 989: 967: 952: 923: 893: 872: 819: 764: 735: 693: 655: 636: 552: 511: 489: 456: 406: 315: 301: 278: 258: 242: 219: 194: 172: 2931: 1605:

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

2880:

Sorry for the much belated response! I'm currently on holiday in

2043:

You removed information pertaining to the Westminster Confession

588:

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at

569:

Hi Pbritti, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the

2723:

Thank you for participating in the July 2024 GAN backlog drive

1005: 135: 15: 3435: 2426: 1066: 561: 2433:

Hello, Pbritti. Please check your email; you've got mail!

2379:

is the northern terminus of the river's navigable portion?

3331:

DYK for 8th National Eucharistic Congress (United States)

1821:

you describe my actions as "shameful". I'd remind you of

1447:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Today's featured article/August 2024

371:

Template:Did you know nominations/Ludwell–Paradise House

3277: 3192:

Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list

2967: 2438: 2044: 1900: 1706:, with a high number of bonus points from that article. 573:

to your account. This means you now have access to the

152:

on my watchlist. What do you think, could this be our

149: 1685:, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and 1656:) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on 3589:) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on 2670:

was startled and a little shocked" when he was shown

2578:

was startled and a little shocked" when he was shown

1702:) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on 1681:) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on 1392:

Ah, shoot. I didn't realize that was a requirement. ~

786:

Congratulations, Pbritti! The article you nominated,

3372: