210:
friends of the subject and extreme specialists. Some background (birth town, birth date, studied at
Columbia, degree in Remember this is an encyclopedia. Second, the article certainly asserts importance for the subject in the lead, but the article references his status as a "correspondent for the Wall Street Journal" to a single article rather than a WSJ listing of their correspondents, etc. If anything, I'd think the article should at least reference three or four separate articles. Does the article refer to him as a "correspondent"? If so, maybe a simple parenthetical comment would do. Is the article available online? Not required but certainly helps when defending against deletion. Also, if one article does make a WSJ "correspondent", then it may not equate to notability. If, on the other hand, this is just an example article, I would guess that a regular WSJ correspondent would be notable. Third, you might consider disclosing your relationship, which has been questioned several times, rather than simply saying that you don't have any
112:
27:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
159:
Take a look at some other articles. Learn how to use footnotes, you can do this clicking "edit this page" on any page with footnotes and seeing how they are constructed.. Then, put footnotes into the article. Also, look up the subject on the google news archive (click googlr, then more then news,
239:
so you can work with an experienced editor to excise the overly personal material and add more citations. This of course, only if and when a deletion decision is rendered, but the debate is open for several more days. One more point, if you decide to revert other editors' edits to the article you
209:
I took a look at the article and I have several thoughts. First, it does give a lot of personal information about the subject that is of marginal if any notability. For example, his education and military service are not likely of any interest to
Knowledge users in general, only to family and
218:
at the very least is a serious question. I don't presume COI, but if I go to the
Vanderbilts and ask to see an unpublished personal diary, then reference it on Knowledge, that's still Original Research and not allowed. If, however, I find a (reliable third party) published analysis of an
76:
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
193:
and it has been listed for deletion because some editors feel he is not notable enough. Would you mind looking the article over and giving me your thoughts on notability, etc? I would really appreciate it.
68:. Knowledge gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an
235:
don't make their decisions based on future potential actions by the opponents of specific deletions. A better solution would be to ask for help and request the article be undeleted to
260:
127:
160:
then archive) and it will turn up news articles from decades ago on this man. Also try google books, he is probably mentioned in a few. good luck.
271:. I have also removed the content from your user page, as it does not preserve the edit history of the article, which is necessary under the
189:
Hi, I noticed that on the "Editor
Assistance" page you were willing to help with some advice on deletions/verifiability. I posted a page on
100:
50:
296:
268:
73:
89:
69:
39:
244:
and, better yet, discussion on the article's talk page. Let me know if you have more questions or want specific advice. --
99:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at
276:
84:
34:
123:
144:
23:
65:
241:
264:
231:
if the article is deleted. These are just processes, they aren't weapons. Experienced participants in
190:
119:
165:
228:
140:
126:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
308:
281:
161:
223:
I can cite on
Knowledge. Finally, I advise strongly against making "threats" to go to
195:
182:
96:
46:
111:
304:
232:
224:
211:
133:
215:
214:. The question of how you got an unpublished family history and how that is not
245:
312:
285:
248:
203:
169:
149:
54:
272:
80:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
30:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
300:
110:
295:
Not sure this helps, but you might considering publishing
219:
unpublished personal diary of a notable individual,
118:An article that you have been involved in editing,
277:Help:Merging and moving pages#How to rename a page
261:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Norman Ralph Bowen
128:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Norman Ralph Bowen
49:. For assistance on the image use policy, see
8:
60:License tagging for Image:NormanBowen2.jpg
17:Image tagging for Image:NormanBowen1A.jpg
7:
107:AfD nomination of Norman Ralph Bowen
101:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
51:Knowledge:Media copyright questions
14:
297:User:Pbsolomon/Norman Ralph Bowen
269:User:Pbsolomon/Norman Ralph Bowen
267:to a subpage of your user page:
103:. 00:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
95:This is an automated notice by
45:This is an automated notice by
263:, I have userfied the article
90:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
40:Knowledge:Image copyright tags
1:
313:00:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
55:23:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
328:
301:http://genealogy.wikia.com
85:Knowledge:Image use policy
35:Knowledge:Image use policy
240:should at least leave an
136:of receiving this notice?
286:18:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
249:12:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
204:22:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
170:17:38, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
150:16:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
185:for unified discussion)
24:Image:NormanBowen1A.jpg
176:Request for Assistance
122:, has been listed for
115:
74:image description page
66:Image:NormanBowen2.jpg
114:
64:Thanks for uploading
21:Thanks for uploading
259:Per your request at
265:Norman Ralph Bowen
255:Norman Ralph Bowen
191:Norman_Ralph_Bowen
120:Norman Ralph Bowen
116:
181:(moved here from
137:
319:
148:
131:
327:
326:
322:
321:
320:
318:
317:
316:
293:
257:
178:
157:
155:Friendly advice
147:
141:CobaltBlueTony™
139:
132:Do you want to
109:
72:applied to the
62:
19:
12:
11:
5:
325:
323:
292:
289:
256:
253:
252:
251:
237:your userspace
183:User talk:Doug
177:
174:
156:
153:
143:
130:. Thank you.
108:
105:
93:
92:
87:
61:
58:
43:
42:
37:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
324:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
290:
288:
287:
284:
283:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
254:
250:
247:
243:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
213:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
192:
187:
186:
184:
175:
173:
171:
167:
163:
154:
152:
151:
146:
142:
135:
129:
125:
121:
113:
106:
104:
102:
98:
91:
88:
86:
83:
82:
81:
78:
75:
71:
67:
59:
57:
56:
52:
48:
41:
38:
36:
33:
32:
31:
28:
26:
25:
16:
294:
282:Black Falcon
280:
279:). Cheers, –
258:
242:edit summary
236:
220:
199:
188:
180:
179:
158:
117:
94:
79:
63:
44:
29:
22:
20:
172:Becca02459
162:Becca02459
229:Mediation
196:Pbsolomon
97:OrphanBot
70:image tag
47:OrphanBot
305:Eustress
124:deletion
134:opt out
275:(see
246:Doug.
216:WP:OR
309:talk
303:. --
291:Idea
273:GFDL
233:XFDs
221:that
200:talk
166:talk
145:talk
299:on
227:or
225:DRV
212:COI
311:)
202:)
168:)
138:-
53:.
307:(
198:(
164:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
