Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Peculiar mr. Hup

Source 📝

23: 69:, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Knowledge (XXG) is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. 46:, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a 58: 43: 38:. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Knowledge (XXG) this is known as " 66: 39: 27: 51: 47: 77: 62: 35: 70: 31: 82: 57:
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to
22: 63:
punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring
65:. In particular, editors should be aware of the 8: 42:" and is usually seen as obstructing the 7: 14: 61:on that page. This isn't done to 34:other editors' contributions at 21: 30:. You appear to be repeatedly 1: 59:lose their editing privileges 83:01:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC) 98: 28:welcome to Knowledge (XXG) 44:normal editing process 32:reverting or undoing 36:Harold Faltermeyer 67:three-revert rule 89: 80: 75: 25: 97: 96: 92: 91: 90: 88: 87: 86: 78: 71: 19: 12: 11: 5: 95: 93: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 94: 85: 84: 81: 76: 74: 68: 64: 60: 55: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 24: 16: 72: 56: 40:edit warring 20: 17:October 2020 73:Laser brain 26:Hello, and 52:talk page 48:consensus 50:on the 79:(talk) 54:.

Index

Information icon
welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
reverting or undoing
Harold Faltermeyer
edit warring
normal editing process
consensus
talk page
lose their editing privileges
punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring
three-revert rule
Laser brain
(talk)
01:45, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.