750:
777:, which closed successfully with 36 supports, 3 opposed, and 1 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, or even if you just stopped by to make a comment, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. Since I am a new admin, if you have any suggestions or concerns, feel free to inform me of them. Thank you and good day.
543:
Hi Pedro. Yes, I could have deleted it myself, but as I am not completely familiar with the subject, I thought I would let someone else make the decision. For me the article didn't assert notability - just stating that it was a programme, but it had a couple of seemingly unrelated external links so I
496:
failed RFA nominations. Any other user would have quit from this project long ago, but not me. The reason is because I can still contribute a great deal to this project as a normal user. Anyway, I will take your advise seriously and try to take note of the comments made by other users in my last RFA.
824:
Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and
Knowledge (XXG) namespace, so that is what I will do. I will go for another RfA in two month's time and I hope you will be able to support
55:
Yes indeed, with regards to people, the article's writer could get angry if their article is deleted and they think it is notable, whereas tests/attacks are obvious, and I have found attacks go very very quick, and that cat is usually empty. But it seems whenever I look at that page, there always is
615:
Thank you very much for your participation by supporting my RfA. As you may very well be aware of, it closed successfully a few hours ago. I just wanted to extend my appreciation for the comprehensive and objective analysis you provided there. The UAA bit was indeed unfortunate, but it appears that
194:
I just came here to leave a note about this article being recreated and saw the above message. You A7'd it after it was tagged as a vanity article by an IP that appears to have POV issues. It does not look to me like a vanity article, especially since the author appears to be male and the subject
720:
Hi. This message has been addressed to you because you happened to be around at the time. Would you mind whacking Image:Orion 005.png , which I made and posted? It was determined to not be much good at all in the sole article it's relevant to, and will be replaced by a couple of better ones.
115:
and do not lambast the editor, also this comment "(re-submitting the article... some idiot seems to have deleted it... he/she must be retarded, because this is a $ 1.85bn company!!!)" does not help. Pedro may have deleted when it was first created because it failed one of the requirements for
518:
soon as well. I will also try to slow down on my edits, especially commenting on Afd pages and RFA pages. Thanks for your kind words of advise and I hope that my next RFA would not be a failure again. (anyway, which editor likes to see his RFA nomination fail consistently??) It can be a very
567:
825:
me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been two months. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! --
181:
Please restore the page you deleted on 28 september. This person is quite notable , she is the
English editor of Iran Press News and one of the most vocal Iranian activists so I do not know why you deleted it . This is an important person , her is a quick video on her
690:
I really appreciate you taking the time to comment and offer your support for my self nomination - Yes, some of my phrasing might be a bit odd - hehe, but I wonder, is it encouraged to continue to flesh out my comments or comment underneath the support/neutral/oppose
645:
BTW, it's a non-for-profit project funded by the
European Commission and several national health authorities to foster the free movement and access to health care all over Europe. So I can't quite follow your view of this being some sort of advertising.
519:
depressing experience and it takes a very strong hearted editor to continue making contributions to this project after a couple of failed RFAs. I do not wish for any editor to experience this kind of failure like what I have gone through! --
597:
Well that'll teach me to go tagging articles when I'm falling asleep! I guess I should have
Googled it first, and now I'll have to; I'm intrigued. What a name! And thank you for the update. :) --
427:
That guy you recently blocked, he was able to edit his talk page to attempt to be unblocked; so does that mean blocked users can still edit any talk pages and does that apply to ips as well?
676:
is always a good place to look if a foreign-language page has been put up for speedy deletion, since you get editors who know the languages assessing the value of these pages. Cheers. --
768:
639:
I started an article on the
European project NETC@RDS and was quite surprised to notice that it's been deleted. As I am new to wikipedia, I'm not quite sure what to make of this.
642:
Could you maybe give me some explanations on why this article was deleted and what I can do to prevent another deletion when I'll try to re-submit information on the project?
673:
616:
taking the high road on the matter served me well. Going forward, I hope that I will show by my actions that I will be constructive element in service to the community.
34:, that occur very often as a test page, with G2, instead of A7, when it is clearly/blatantly obvious the person is well just your everyday joe, and not notable?
574:
I've declined this speedy deletion. Believe it or not it's a real place! I've changed the page into a redirect. Thanks for your hard work tagging speedies!
514:
Yes, I have already started doing some new page patrol and have tagged a couple of articles for speedy deletion. I will take your advise on helping out on
492:
Hello! First of all, I would like to thank you for your very kind words of encouraging. I admit that it is quite a bit frustrating to have a total of
497:
Lastly, I wish to thank you for having faith in me and supporting my last RFA. I hope to earn the community's trust in the future as well. Thanks! --
475:
210:
381:
What, you want me to do admin tasks for you and expect me not to kick you in the teeth while I can? Cummon, I'm a whinging pom after all!!!!
257:, now seeing as I'm a curious person I tried to access the page, but alas it is limited to admins, can you tell me what that page is for?
254:, where I sortof went against the flow by giving a neutral (hopefully everyone sees it in good faith), the user said they would browse
555:
649:
But we learn as we live and I'd be quite happy if you could shine some light on that issue (and maybe undelete the article).
116:
notability or did not state its notability or was a very short article. Next time, please do not resort to personal attacks.
108:
368:
348:
293:
195:
is female. If the factual assertions in the article are accurate, she looks notable enough to survive A7. IMHO. --
798:
88:
363:
343:
288:
672:. It goes on "The divine beings are made of EVA since it is the best material that exists in the universe...".
670:
782:
794:
252:
175:
131:
515:
454:
703:
Oh yes, it is fine to add your opinions and explain further in response to oppose/neutral comments.
619:
Seeing that I am loathe to spam or "Template the
Regulars", I will keep this short. Thanks again, --
692:
550:
469:
204:
836:
568:
Taumata whakatangi hangakoauau o tamatea turi pukakapiki maunga horo nuku pokai whenua kitanatahu
112:
598:
463:
198:
126:
92:
749:
521:
499:
583:
390:
325:
307:
Man... the
Aussies thought they had it long before... but alas Jonny finishes them off...
231:
151:
17:
653:
545:
677:
620:
526:
504:
46:
Ok got it. On another note, I've found G2's get deleted much more quickly than A7's.
56:
a backlog... Ok I'm off for tonight, but before I go, here's two clear cut cases.
316:
Ah, DHMO I did laugh - sorry dude! As Phgao says - the main man lifted us again!
810:
This end the usual RFA thanks spam. You may return to your regular editing now.
829:
735:
725:
707:
695:
680:
656:
623:
601:
590:
560:
530:
508:
482:
445:
431:
406:
397:
376:
356:
332:
311:
301:
273:
261:
238:
217:
188:
158:
137:
120:
95:
72:
57:
50:
38:
846:
732:
722:
704:
577:
537:
442:
428:
403:
384:
319:
308:
270:
258:
225:
185:
145:
117:
69:
47:
35:
826:
632:
Question regarding deletion of new article - and it was my first one ... :o(
255:
269:
Yay! Thanks for the quick response :) Hope RL isn't getting too hectic!
66:
63:
32:
142:
Good point. But I'm not crazy. And neither am I. Ohhhhhhh....!
59:
61:
125:
If Pedro is indeed crazy, then it's really not an attack.
807:. So unfortunately this is not entirely my own design.
440:
338:
674:
Knowledge (XXG):Pages needing translation into
English
91:? It's a $ 1.85bn listed company!!! Are you crazy?
8:
222:I see it's fixed. Apologies if I was hasty.
460:Yay -- I'm famous! ED here I come!! ;-) --
87:Why did you delete the article about
7:
781:
767:Thank you for your participation in
402:I sense a block coming ^.^ *ducks*
24:
793:This RFA thanks was inspired by
748:
652:All the best from sunny Vienna,
797:, who in turn was inspired by
759:Click there to open your card!
546:
488:RE:Your RFA was not successful
1:
799:
769:
551:
476:
470:
464:
361:Cheers. But god I hate you.
211:
205:
199:
830:00:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
736:13:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
726:13:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
708:14:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
696:14:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
681:10:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
657:08:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
624:00:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
556:
439:Nice, 10 year protection :D
602:19:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
591:13:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
561:15:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
544:thought it was borderline.
531:15:14, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
509:14:55, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
483:09:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
446:09:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
432:08:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
407:08:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
398:08:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
377:08:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
357:08:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
333:08:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
312:08:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
302:08:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
274:08:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
262:08:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
251:In one of the recent RfA's
239:07:19, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
218:06:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
189:11:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
159:07:10, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
138:18:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
121:10:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
96:07:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
89:Greenhill (investment bank)
73:12:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
51:11:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
39:11:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
31:Is it ok to tag such pages
863:
341:AND THEN GO TO HELL!!!111
765:My dear Wikipedian Pedro,
337:Hey Peds, could you undo
286:You know what...bite me!
608:Thanks for the support.
566:Re: Speedy deletion of
802:Phaedriel's RFA thanks
716:Image deletion request
686:Requests for adminship
176:Banafsheh Zand-Bonazzi
842:Message's withdrawn.
68:5. Ok i'll stop. :)
364:Dihydrogen Monoxide
344:Dihydrogen Monoxide
289:Dihydrogen Monoxide
813:
812:
783:The Placebo Effect
754:
845:Have a good day,
795:The Random Editor
786:
780:
760:
746:
669:Have a look here
589:
455:Butseriouslyfolks
396:
331:
237:
157:
134:
854:
805:
785:
775:
758:
752:
588:
586:
575:
558:
553:
548:
529:
524:
507:
502:
480:
478:
472:
466:
395:
393:
382:
330:
328:
317:
236:
234:
223:
215:
213:
207:
201:
156:
154:
143:
135:
133:
65:Ok make that 4.
862:
861:
857:
856:
855:
853:
852:
851:
840:
822:
817:
816:
815:
814:
791:
762:
753:
744:
718:
688:
667:
634:
610:
584:
576:
571:
541:
522:
520:
500:
498:
490:
462:
458:
425:
391:
383:
372:
352:
326:
318:
297:
284:
249:
232:
224:
197:
179:
152:
144:
132:
85:
29:
22:
21:
20:
18:User talk:Pedro
12:
11:
5:
860:
858:
839:
833:
821:
818:
790:
787:
778:
766:
763:
757:
756:
755:
747:
745:
743:
740:
739:
738:
717:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
687:
684:
666:
663:
661:
633:
630:
628:
609:
606:
605:
604:
570:
564:
540:
535:
534:
533:
489:
486:
457:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
424:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
370:
350:
295:
283:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
178:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
162:
161:
84:
81:
80:
79:
78:
77:
76:
75:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
859:
850:
848:
843:
838:
834:
832:
831:
828:
820:My recent RfA
819:
811:
808:
806:
804:
803:
796:
788:
784:
779:
776:
774:
773:
751:
741:
737:
734:
730:
729:
728:
727:
724:
715:
709:
706:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
694:
685:
683:
682:
679:
675:
671:
664:
662:
659:
658:
655:
650:
647:
643:
640:
637:
631:
629:
626:
625:
622:
617:
613:
607:
603:
600:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
587:
581:
580:
569:
565:
563:
562:
559:
554:
549:
539:
536:
532:
528:
525:
517:
513:
512:
511:
510:
506:
503:
495:
487:
485:
484:
481:
479:
473:
467:
456:
453:
447:
444:
441:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
430:
422:
408:
405:
401:
400:
399:
394:
388:
387:
380:
379:
378:
374:
366:
365:
360:
359:
358:
354:
346:
345:
340:
336:
335:
334:
329:
323:
322:
315:
314:
313:
310:
306:
305:
304:
303:
299:
291:
290:
281:
275:
272:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
260:
256:
253:
246:
240:
235:
229:
228:
221:
220:
219:
216:
214:
208:
202:
193:
192:
191:
190:
187:
183:
177:
174:
160:
155:
149:
148:
141:
140:
139:
136:
130:
129:
124:
123:
122:
119:
114:
110:
106:
105:
104:
103:
102:
101:
100:
99:
98:
97:
94:
90:
82:
74:
71:
67:
64:
62:
60:
58:
54:
53:
52:
49:
45:
44:
43:
42:
41:
40:
37:
33:
26:
19:
844:
841:
835:Deletion of
823:
809:
801:
800:
792:
771:
770:
764:
719:
689:
668:
660:
651:
648:
644:
641:
638:
635:
627:
618:
614:
611:
599:HamatoKameko
578:
573:
572:
542:
493:
491:
461:
459:
426:
385:
362:
342:
320:
287:
285:
250:
226:
196:
180:
146:
128:the_undertow
127:
86:
30:
837:Epic McFail
516:WP:HELPDESK
339:this block?
111:and remain
93:Agronimator
847:User:Pedro
742:RFA Thanks
731:Thanks! --
612:Hi Pedro,
538:Flowtracer
423:Here we go
654:WKreutzer
471:seriously
206:seriously
83:Greenhill
693:Wisdom89
691:section?
678:Folantin
665:Os patos
621:Aarktica
282:Your RfA
27:Me again
789:Credits
527:iva1979
505:iva1979
107:Please
772:my RFA
547:пﮟოьεԻ
761:→ → →
733:Kizor
723:Kizor
705:Phgao
585:Chat
579:Pedro
477:folks
443:Phgao
429:Phgao
404:Phgao
392:Chat
386:Pedro
327:Chat
321:Pedro
309:Phgao
271:Phgao
259:Phgao
247:Help!
233:Chat
227:Pedro
212:folks
186:CltFn
153:Chat
147:Pedro
118:Phgao
113:civil
70:Phgao
48:Phgao
36:Phgao
16:<
827:Cobi
636:Hi,
494:five
184:] --
465:But
200:But
109:AGF
849:.
721:--
582::
389::
375:)
355:)
324::
300:)
230::
150::
557:7
552:5
523:S
501:S
474:|
468:|
373:O
371:2
369:H
367:(
353:O
351:2
349:H
347:(
298:O
296:2
294:H
292:(
209:|
203:|
182:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.