Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Phd8511

Source 📝

56:
suspect that most reserve units will be without equipment: i.e. the reserve artillery regiments will only train with the guns, but not have any... so they are purely filler for the active regiments... which leads me to think that most of the active units will be severely understrength. Also: the structure is full of waste; i.e. 6th REM&E supports 1st Armoured Infantry Brigade, but is under 101st Logistic Brigade, and is paired with an Army Reserve battalion under 102nd Logistic Brigade... or: artillery and engineer units are under 1st Artillery and 8th Engineer... but the REM&E units that will support them are under 101st and 102nd Logistic. Well, the British always have loved a confusing Army structure,
41:
one paired with units in 101 Logistic) are meant to complete 7th and 51st brigade upon deployment. And one other thing: in my view 4th and 42nd Brigade should be merged to create one brigade of equal size to 7th and 51st. But however you look at it - this is the most complicated structured army I ever encountered. If doubt this will work... for deployments with enough time to organize the units it will work... but for short term emergencies... doubt it!
216: 96: 136: 40:
I didn't know that. The most interesting aspect I learned from doing the graphic is that the 7th and 51st Brigade are clearly intended to be deployable: the two artillery regiments (3 RHA, 4 RA), the two Close Support Engineer Regiments (21, 26) and all the units of 102 Logistic Brigade (minus the
55:
yep, the missing signal squadrons is another of these things I don't understand. British brigades now lack: signals, artillery, engineers, logistics... and will onyl get these when needed... the South African Army tried to do it like this too... and now goes back to the brigade structure. Also I
228:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
256: 240:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 177: 270: 70:
ah yeah, the British Army and its love for rotation... at least it is not as bad as it once was. But it is a waste of money anyway.
104: 266: 249: 173: 22: 144: 109: 261: 159: 155: 151: 237: 224: 206: 233: 75: 61: 46: 30: 245: 193: 183: 122: 248:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 241: 169: 154:
that was created to violate Knowledge (XXG) policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
172:. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may 71: 57: 42: 26: 215: 189: 118: 95: 252:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
135: 274: 197: 126: 79: 65: 50: 34: 255:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
130: 114:. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. 236:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
168:, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban 8: 23:Structure of the British Army#Army 2020 7: 225:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 238:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 107:on other people again, you may be 14: 214: 134: 94: 222:Hello, Phd8511. Voting in the 1: 275:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 17:Structure of the British Army 80:17:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 66:16:34, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 51:12:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC) 35:17:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC) 259:and submit your choices on 292: 267:MediaWiki message delivery 257:the candidates' statements 198:02:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC) 170:may be reverted or deleted 127:18:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC) 178:guide to appealing blocks 186:|Your reason here ~~~~}} 180:, then adding the text 143:This account has been 112:without further notice 234:Arbitration Committee 207:ArbCom Elections 2016 176:by first reading the 158:, but using them for 21:You might like this: 110:blocked from editing 250:arbitration policy 209:: Voting now open! 203: 202: 174:appeal this block 283: 218: 187: 138: 131: 105:personal attacks 98: 291: 290: 286: 285: 284: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 262:the voting page 219: 211: 181: 116:Enough already. 92: 19: 12: 11: 5: 289: 287: 220: 213: 212: 210: 204: 201: 200: 139: 103:; if you make 91: 88: 87: 86: 85: 84: 83: 82: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 288: 277: 276: 272: 268: 264: 263: 258: 253: 251: 247: 243: 239: 235: 230: 227: 226: 217: 208: 205: 199: 195: 191: 185: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 162: 157: 153: 149: 148: 146: 140: 137: 133: 132: 129: 128: 124: 120: 117: 113: 111: 106: 102: 99:This is your 97: 89: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 67: 63: 59: 54: 53: 52: 48: 44: 39: 38: 37: 36: 32: 28: 24: 16: 260: 254: 231: 223: 221: 165: 161:illegitimate 160: 147:indefinitely 142: 141: 115: 108: 101:only warning 100: 93: 20: 152:sock puppet 246:topic bans 90:April 2016 242:site bans 164:reasons 72:noclador 58:noclador 43:noclador 27:noclador 188:below. 184:unblock 156:allowed 145:blocked 190:Drmies 166:is not 119:Drmies 150:as a 271:talk 232:The 194:talk 123:talk 76:talk 62:talk 47:talk 31:talk 273:) 265:. 244:, 196:) 182:{{ 125:) 78:) 64:) 49:) 33:) 25:. 269:( 192:( 121:( 74:( 60:( 45:( 29:(

Index

Structure of the British Army#Army 2020
noclador
talk
17:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
noclador
talk
12:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
noclador
talk
16:34, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
noclador
talk
17:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Stop icon
personal attacks
blocked from editing
Drmies
talk
18:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

blocked
sock puppet
allowed
illegitimate
may be reverted or deleted
appeal this block
guide to appealing blocks
unblock
Drmies
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.