204:"With his grave misunderstanding of our profession, he has decided that PR people are biased and thus are not allowed to create or edit Knowledge pages for our organizations or clients – even simple corrections of errors like the misspelling of the CEO’s name. So we are left with a confusing, cumbersome process to do our job when it involves Knowledge."
406:
Thanks, SilverSeren. Flourish tends not to be a lightning rod for coverage. (Most student-run conferences aren't.) It *is* however a group that my wife and I have volunteered for since 2008. This year, thanks to my MBA studies, I didn't have the time to continue my role as online ambassador, handling
164:
On the other hand, it's my opinion that the objective stated above precludes collaboration - not direct editing - and more education among marketers. Of course, I may agree with the objective stated above, but later disagree with how one proposes to achieve it. This is a good mission statement to use
557:
Sure, the false statement was posted in the thread "Worth watching: Jimmy Wales is creating an FAQ ...", and an additional false statement was posted in the suggestion box thread. I have added a message there to clarify my views and to state what I think will resolve this matter, so we can all get
62:
It appears that, despite the group's statement that they are looking for people with a variety of different backgrounds, my request to join has been rejected on
Facebook. This despite the fact that I am a journalist who could contribute to and benefit from the group. Have you any thoughts as to why
542:
It would be helpful if you could point me to the statement itself on the FB group so I can get the context. I've read the suggestion box item and it seems that there's a disagreement about the policy-ness of "brightline." Inaccurate, perhaps, but I don't yet see how this misunderstanding could be
497:
about a false statement about myself that was published on your facebook CREWE group. Let me be clear: It's time for YOU and the other members of that facebook group to clean up your(collective) act, immmediately. I expect action on this, otherwise I don't see how I could ever see CREWE as more
232:
Wow... Hadn't noticed this. A bit bent that they're trading on CREWE and my name to book events that I had no knowledge or part of. Chances are pretty good that they aren't quite spun up on the substance of what CREWE is trying to accomplish. It happens, unfortunately. Much as I'd imagine not all
154:
The way several blogs, the media, PRSA, and John Cass have depicted CREWE is as a lobbying group bent on getting direct editing privileges on
Knowledge. This is an aggressive stance for a group of participants new to Knowledge. It also comes off as very rude and offensive to attack Knowledge's
331:
Yup. One thing I'll add merely as a comment is that the mission statement only says "accurate" and "balanced," but not "complete." "Accurate" implies factual corrections, "balance" implies flagging libel/defamation, coatrack articles, etc. These are somewhat non-controversial issues for PR
673:
Feel free to circulate this to anyone you think should know about it, but please recognize that it hasn't agreed upon by either PR organizations or WikiProjects or the wider community. It's also just a draft, so any/many changes can still be made. Thanks and cheers,
586:
Correct, you didn't see my response in that facebook thread, and highly unlikely that you will see any participation from me in the facebook group. I prefer to use on-Knowledge discussion areas. I talked about that briefly in the thread at
407:
the FB and
Twitter accounts. But I *did* get to be a speaker. Unfortunately, thanks to the aforementioned studies, I'll be missing the real meat of the conference, like a beginner's workshop for Arduino. *grumble* --
78:
Hi, ebikeguy... There are several admins and we tend to be a bit more persnickety about pseudonymous accounts. (I think there's maybe only one or two out of the 170 there.) Go ahead and resubmit. Thanks.
361:
Were you to add "complete" or encourage direct editing broadly, that is the area where
Wikipedians will have a lot of well-deserved apprehension. It takes a lot of work to do that well.
125:
I just thought I'd drop you a note that this is a far more welcomed objective than what it seems to have been in the past. Glad to see it go in this direction if that is the case. Cheers.
572:
Typically that's how people solve problems rather than showing up on a user's talk page and insulting them or their affiliations. I didn't see your response in that FB thread itself. --
715:
We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
103:
detailing the headway I've made and the solution I came up with. I'd be interested in your opinion, and whether or not you think its a step in the right direction. Thanks!
543:
damaging to any individual. (Particularly a pseudonymous one.) Not trying to be difficult. Just would appreciate some help here if you feel you've been wronged somehow. --
99:
Hi Phil, I commented on your blog but don't know if you saw it. I've been working out a solution to the issue with PR professionals editing
Knowledge, and have written an
112:
263:
I suppose if CREWE were on
Knowledge, I'd suggest a collaborative editing process to develop consensus on a mission statement that objectives can sprout from.
122:"exploring the ways that PR and Knowledge can work together for mutual benefit, defined narrowly as cooperation toward more accurate and balanced entries"
22:
522:
494:
588:
697:
608:
And also correct: I made a very poor choice of wording on this message on your talk. I've revised the message, and the title. Thanks. --
464:
42:
Wow, neat. Will explore more fully after I've had some sleep. Many thanks in setting it up. I just posted about it on the CREWE FB board. --
427:
Hi. I suggested the creation of an on-Knowledge "suggestion box" for CREWE, where folks can make public suggestions to the group. See
100:
63:
my request to join the group was not accepted and/or things I could do to better my chances of being accepted into the group? Thanks!
428:
389:
I hope all goes well with your presentation at the conference. It'll be interesting to see if it spurs any more news articles.
663:
I've thought of an idea that might break our current logjam with paid editing. I'd love your sincere feedback and opinion.
293:
Not sure that would fix the problem for *that* particular audience. In any event, that effort will be on WP:Cooperation. --
616:
599:
566:
533:
506:
475:
439:
667:
848:
834:
108:
395:
31:
725:
720:
682:
842:
730:
613:
596:
563:
530:
503:
472:
436:
104:
68:
517:
I made a very poor choice of wording in this message. My apologies. Here is a better message:
644:
390:
26:
678:
525:
about an issue I feel needs attention. Could you assist in clearing up this matter? --
735:
573:
544:
450:
408:
294:
234:
137:
80:
43:
649:
610:
593:
560:
527:
500:
469:
433:
362:
264:
223:
174:
126:
64:
637:
222:
This doesn't accomplish anything and only proves an inability to write neutrally.
675:
183:
686:
653:
620:
603:
581:
552:
510:
479:
458:
443:
416:
400:
366:
302:
268:
242:
227:
178:
145:
130:
88:
72:
51:
36:
233:
Wikipedians are form-fit-function in line with
Knowledge's mission. --
801:
794:
787:
780:
773:
766:
759:
25:
and I thought you would be interested. Thanks for your time.
695:
589:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cooperation#CREWE_suggestion_box
136:
Thanks. How did you previously understand the objective? --
95:
An essay outlining my approach to PR pros editing
Knowledge
332:
professionals to get involved in that aren't complicated.
465:
165:
as a launch-pad for more specific objectives anyway.
155:policies, without knowing what those policies are.
643:Hi Philgomes. I've added a message to your note
647:that you might be able to help with. Cheers,
8:
755:
498:then just a silly, ineffective joke. --
429:Knowledge:WikiProject Cooperation#Tasks
7:
850:Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
692:Welcome to The Knowledge Adventure!
731:The Teahouse new editor help space
721:The Knowledge Adventure Start Page
14:
186:is a good example of what I mean.
726:The Knowledge Adventure Lounge
521:Phil, I left a message in the
493:Phil, I left a message in the
365:(COI Disclosure on User Page)
267:(COI Disclosure on User Page)
226:(COI Disclosure on User Page)
177:(COI Disclosure on User Page)
129:(COI Disclosure on User Page)
1:
844:About The Knowledge Adventure
752:-- 19:54, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
113:02:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
89:22:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
73:17:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
52:02:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
37:01:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
659:COI+ certification proposal
866:
822:The Veil of Verifiability
819:The Neutral Point of View
816:Small Changes, Big Impact
417:12:21, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
401:06:31, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
367:23:52, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
303:15:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
269:15:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
243:00:43, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
228:00:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
179:01:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
146:12:18, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
131:22:47, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
687:15:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
654:04:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
621:22:10, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
604:21:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
582:21:48, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
577:
553:21:22, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
548:
511:20:51, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
454:
412:
298:
238:
141:
84:
47:
21:I just recently started
813:An Invitation to Earth
810:Say Hello to the World
480:15:39, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
459:15:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
444:14:59, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
23:Wikiproject Cooperation
17:Wikiproject Cooperation
828:Looking Good Together
700:
699:
736:Knowledge Help pages
668:WP:COI certification
449:Me likey. Thanks! --
385:Flourish! Conference
463:No worry. Stub at
825:The Civility Code
701:
558:back to work. --
513:
832:
831:
617:(COI Declaration)
600:(COI Declaration)
567:(COI Declaration)
534:(COI Declaration)
507:(COI Declaration)
492:
476:(COI Declaration)
440:(COI Declaration)
857:
851:
845:
804:
797:
790:
783:
776:
769:
762:
756:
698:
619:
602:
591:. Thanks. --
569:
536:
509:
478:
467:. Cheers. --
442:
431:. Thanks! --
398:
393:
118:CREWE Objectives
58:CREWE Membership
34:
29:
865:
864:
860:
859:
858:
856:
855:
854:
853:
849:
843:
840:
802:
795:
788:
781:
774:
767:
760:
696:
694:
661:
641:
609:
592:
559:
526:
499:
490:
468:
432:
425:
396:
391:
387:
120:
97:
60:
32:
27:
19:
12:
11:
5:
863:
861:
841:
839:
833:
830:
829:
826:
823:
820:
817:
814:
811:
807:
806:
799:
792:
785:
778:
771:
764:
754:
753:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
733:
728:
723:
693:
690:
671:
670:
660:
657:
640:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
523:suggestion box
519:
518:
495:suggestion box
489:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
424:
423:Suggestion box
421:
420:
419:
386:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
207:
206:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
169:
168:
167:
166:
159:
158:
157:
156:
149:
148:
119:
116:
96:
93:
92:
91:
59:
56:
55:
54:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
862:
852:
846:
838:
837:
827:
824:
821:
818:
815:
812:
809:
808:
805:
800:
798:
793:
791:
786:
784:
779:
777:
772:
770:
765:
763:
758:
757:
751:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
718:
717:
716:
714:
711:
710:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
691:
689:
688:
684:
680:
677:
669:
666:
665:
664:
658:
656:
655:
652:
651:
646:
639:
636:
622:
618:
615:
612:
607:
606:
605:
601:
598:
595:
590:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
571:
570:
568:
565:
562:
556:
555:
554:
550:
546:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
535:
532:
529:
524:
516:
515:
514:
512:
508:
505:
502:
496:
487:
481:
477:
474:
471:
466:
462:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:
447:
446:
445:
441:
438:
435:
430:
422:
418:
414:
410:
405:
404:
403:
402:
399:
394:
384:
368:
364:
363:User:King4057
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
304:
300:
296:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
270:
266:
265:User:King4057
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
244:
240:
236:
231:
230:
229:
225:
224:User:King4057
221:
220:
219:
218:
217:
216:
205:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
185:
182:
181:
180:
176:
175:User:King4057
173:
172:
171:
170:
163:
162:
161:
160:
153:
152:
151:
150:
147:
143:
139:
135:
134:
133:
132:
128:
127:User:King4057
123:
117:
115:
114:
110:
106:
102:
94:
90:
86:
82:
77:
76:
75:
74:
70:
66:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
40:
39:
38:
35:
30:
24:
16:
835:
712:
672:
662:
648:
642:
638:Corning Inc.
520:
491:
426:
388:
203:
124:
121:
105:I'm Tony Ahn
98:
61:
20:
679:EdwardsBot
803:Mission 7
796:Mission 6
789:Mission 5
782:Mission 4
775:Mission 3
768:Mission 2
761:Mission 1
574:Philgomes
545:Philgomes
451:Philgomes
409:Philgomes
295:Philgomes
235:Philgomes
138:Philgomes
81:Philgomes
44:Philgomes
836:Get Help
611:Eclipsed
594:Eclipsed
561:Eclipsed
528:Eclipsed
501:Eclipsed
470:Eclipsed
434:Eclipsed
65:Ebikeguy
650:Lindsay
488:request
676:Ocaasi
614:(talk)
597:(talk)
564:(talk)
531:(talk)
504:(talk)
473:(talk)
437:(talk)
392:Silver
28:Silver
397:seren
101:essay
33:seren
683:talk
645:here
578:talk
549:talk
455:talk
413:talk
299:talk
239:talk
184:This
142:talk
109:talk
85:talk
69:talk
48:talk
713:Hi!
847:|
685:)
580:)
551:)
457:)
415:)
301:)
241:)
144:)
111:)
87:)
79:--
71:)
50:)
681:(
576:(
547:(
453:(
411:(
297:(
237:(
140:(
107:(
83:(
67:(
46:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.